Caitanyachandra

bump'ed into him.

www.shiva.org

from www.ambaa.org

post what u think.

say he teaches dhyana-yoga! it's called kundalini-yoga dummies.

later.

Bhagavata Purana states that Pariksit has died immediately after Taskara’s bite. The poison of that bite was so strong that Pariksit was immediately burned and reduced into ashes before the assembly, and that event was witnessed by countless sages, saint, muktas, and even by Vedavyasa himself by and Parasara.

But Sanatana Goswami did not credit Bhagavata’s version on Pariksit’s death. In his Bhrad-bhagavatamrta Sanatana says that Pariksit has narrated Gopakumara’s adventures to his mother Uttara sooner after the winged-snake’s bite. According to Sanatana this narrative has taken some days before Pariksit could die, as ‘bhrad’ also means ‘long,’ or ‘big’ narrative; and so, as long as the Bhagavata’s narrative.

 

So, is Sanatana contradicting Bhagavata? How to conciliate Sanatana’s version and Vedavyasa’s? For certain one cannot employ Madhva’s argument, that these are versions from two different kalpas.

Why can't these two stories be from 'two different kalpas'.

There is nothing in your post to show why this cannot be true. yi

siour jokes make not non-sense.

a

[This message has been edited by Caitanyachandra (edited 10-23-2001).]

a

[This message has been edited by Caitanyachandra (edited 10-23-2001).]

"There are many instances cited in Krsna's pastimes where He is defeated by His devotees in the form of parents, friends, and lovers. He seems to enjoy it..."

I don't recal any.

read up and don't come back wappie.

[This message has been edited by Caitanyachandra (edited 10-23-2001).]

you're born into the system. your qualities are by birth not by action.

just follow the vedic scriptures or prabhupada.

You can learn Sanksrit via the books of the Goswamis. There is one samhita bye J. Goswami that teaches Sanksrit through Hari-nama.

On VNN.org, I believe the user Jagat stated that he created a learning package based on this.

If this is true, maybe he can share his thoughts on that.

[This message has been edited by Caitanyachandra (edited 10-20-2001).]

Good point T. D.A.S

I will check with the big one in Merrivile.

Thanks for the Reminderji.

"Why does He not apply spirituality"

It would be interesting to know what you mean by using intelligence instead of spirituality. As far as i Know, SPirituality is applying the logic of intellect on reality.

"Why does He not apply spirituality"

It would be interesting to know what you mean by using intelligence instead of spirituality. As far as i Know, SPirituality is applying the logic of intellect on reality.

http://www.bhajankutir.net/tol.html

 

As anyone secured an admission into the Tol? If not, then for others I think that there should be an alternative educational source similar to the Tol he is creating.

Everyone should be allowed to enter it. After all the educational system is shifting to a infrastructure-less system of computer educated civilized citizins.

I do not believe AMerican Sanksrit is a bona-fide organization.

[This message has been edited by Caitanyachandra (edited 10-20-2001).]

http://www.barnesandnobleuniversity.com/BaseServlet/home;jsessionid=aaa4notOSrR3QF

Online courses by Barnes & Noble the bookseller, ahem.

 

SHVU

">Brahman

 

=krishna ofcourse. Any verses from anywhere telling something like

rudra=brahman must be dismissed. This will then make everything thoroughly

consistent. There is no logic in this procedure, but people who point this out

are indulging in chest beating. So don't you dare do any such thing."

Brahman = dual-nondifferentiated consciousNess.

Cheers.

[This message has been edited by Caitanyachandra (edited 10-17-2001).]

What is a "pure devotee"?

 

Purely devoted to who/what?

 

What does that depend on?

 

What does it include?

 

What does it exclude?

 

Zastric references would be helpful to you Suryas.

[This message has been edited by Caitanyachandra (edited 10-17-2001).]

By whose estimation are we to accept, (with regard to who “determines”) that which is believed acceptable: included and/or excluded?

 

Real GURU.

[This message has been edited by Caitanyachandra (edited 10-17-2001).]

What would be a nice study is the impact from the media in these modern economy!

[This message has been edited by Caitanyachandra (edited 10-15-2001).]

test

[This message has been edited by Caitanyachandra (edited 03-16-2002).]

just email 'THEM.

chaitanyacandra@indiadivine.com

THANKS>

[This message has been edited by Caitanyachandra (edited 10-15-2001).]

See post below viewerz.

[This message has been edited by Caitanyachandra (edited 10-17-2001).]

VRAJ>

[This message has been edited by Caitanyachandra (edited 10-15-2001).]

Like Manindranath Guha "The Holy Name is a Vaikuntha substance (Bhag. 6.2.14) that is, a substance without mutilation it

does not become impure in any condition it does not not become corrupted by incursion of the faults

of an offender or, in the semblance of the name it is not changed."

bhajankutir.net

 

Surays, give an interpretation on this verse.

[This message has been edited by Caitanyachandra (edited 10-15-2001).]