Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

RamanaDasi

Members
  • Content Count

    98
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by RamanaDasi


  1.  

    10olc3p.jpg

     

    Looks like it is being kept.

     

    "By the result of our past lives’ fruitive activities we have got this body, material body. That is also not our real body. That is the body of the prison house, just like when a criminal is put into the prison house, he is given a different dress. In hospital, in prison house, when a man is there, his original dress is taken away. It is kept. When he’s released from the hospital or jail, the same dress is again returned. Otherwise his present dress is taken and a separate dress is given. Similarly, we have got our spiritual body, not that we are zero, as the Mayavadi thinks."

     

    Srimad-Bhagavatam 7.9.32

    by His Divine Grace A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada

    Mayapur, March 10, 1976

     

    The spiritual body is manifest from the consciousness of the Self. See Vedanta-sutra 4.4.1

     

    The spiritual body is never in a separate location from the soul, the conscious self.

     

    Prior to the realization of one's siddha-deha (spiritual body), or in other words in the practitioner stage of sadhana bhakti, the spiritual form of the self is of an indeterminate shape. This matter is also dealt with in some detail in Vedanta-sutra 4.4.8-12. The self only manifests a spiritual form (siddha-deha) when the liberated soul has a desire to render service to the Lord through a spiritual form and senses.

     

    In Chaitanya Charitamrta, Sri Chaitanya says to Sanatan Goswami (a few times) mukta api lilaya vigraham krtva bhagavantam bhajante. That is, a mukta (liberated soul) who is wanting to engage in bhajan of Bhagavan and to participate in the lila of Bhagavan will "krtva" a "vigraha".

     

    The soul will make (krtva) a spiritual body (vigraha) through a transformation of their consciousness-bliss-body (satchitananda). This is explained in the commentary of Sri Bhakti Siddhanta Saraswati Thakura, but unfortunately this is not given in your Iskcon publication.

     

    The idea that the spiritual body is in the spiritual sky waiting for us, and that we are in a different place from our spiritual body, is directly refuted by Vedavyasa in Vedanta sutra 4.4.1-12. I guess that since Vedanta Sutra is not one of Prabhupada's books some people such as Sarva will not believe what is written there.


  2.  

    Souls do fall from Paravyoma:

     

    Srimad Bhagavata 10.2.32

     

    ye 'nye 'ravindaksa vimukta-maninas

    tvayy asta-bhavad avisuddha-buddhayah

    aruhya krcchrena param padam tatah

    patanty adho 'nadrta-yusmad-anghrayah

     

    "O Lord, the intelligence of those who think themselves liberated but who have no devotion is impure. Even though they rise to the highest point of liberation by dint of severe penances and austerities, they are sure to fall down again into material existence, for they do not take shelter at Your lotus feet."

     

    This verse is quoted many times by Sri Chaitanya in his Sanatana-siksha in Chaitanya Charitamrta

     

    This verse says souls who are liberated (vimukta) but who have no devotion to the Lord can fall down. But the devotees never fall down.

     

     

    ābrahma-bhuvanāl lokāḥ

    punar āvartino 'rjuna

    mām upetya tu kaunteya

    punar janma na vidyate


  3.  

     

    No one falls down from Paravyoma.

    .

     

    Souls do fall from Paravyoma:

     

    Srimad Bhagavata 10.2.32

     

    ye 'nye 'ravindaksa vimukta-maninas

    tvayy asta-bhavad avisuddha-buddhayah

    aruhya krcchrena param padam tatah

    patanty adho 'nadrta-yusmad-anghrayah

     

    "O Lord, the intelligence of those who think themselves liberated but who have no devotion is impure. Even though they rise to the highest point of liberation by dint of severe penances and austerities, they are sure to fall down again into material existence, for they do not take shelter at Your lotus feet."

     

    This verse is quoted many times by Sri Chaitanya in his Sanatana-siksha in Chaitanya Charitamrta


  4. It seems you are saying of the Gopis: "no, they never falldown from that exalted level".

     

    By "that exalted level" I understand you to mean to say they never forget Krishna even when they are dreaming.

     

    This is true. Only jivas fall.

     

    Thakura Bhaktivinoda wrote this about the fall of the jiva from his original position where the jiva was a "atomic portion of that sun's ray".

     

    ========

     

     

    The soul, according to Sri Chaitanya is an atomic part of the Divine Soul. It is a sort of God's power to produce beings who are spiritual in essence but liable to be enthralled by 'Maya', when they forget their position as eternal servants of the Deity. God here is compared with the sun and the souls are said to be the atomic portions of that sun's rays unable to stand freely, unless they are protected by another competent attribute of God's power. By the word part is not meant to be portions cut out of a piece of stone by the axe, but is meant to be like one lamp lighted from another, or gold produced from an alchemist’s stone as believed by the ancients. The souls are also compared with separate atomic emanations of the burning fire. Each soul has drawn from its Fountainhead a proportionate share of the attributes and consequently a small proportion of the free will. These souls are naturally located between the chit jagat, and mayik jagat. Those who chose to serve their God were protected from fall by the interference of the hladini attribute of the Supreme chit sakti. They have been admitted as eternal servants of the Deity in various ways. They know not the troubles of maya and the karma-chakra or the rotative principles of mayik action and its result. Those who wanted to enjoy were grasped by maya from the other side. They are in maya’s karma-chakra, ending only when they again see their original position as servants of the Deity. These souls, whether liberated from maya or enthralled by her, are separate responsible beings depending on the Deity. Hari is the Lord of maya, who serves Him at His pleasure. The soul or jiva is so constructed as to be liable to be enthralled by maya in consequence of want of power when unassisted by the hladini-sakti of the Deity. Hence, there is a natural and inherent distinction between God and jiva which no pantheistic maneuver can annihilate. P lease avoid this misleading question, "When were these jivas created and enthralled?" The mayik time has no existence in spiritual history, because it has its commencement after the enthrallment of jivas in matter, and you cannot, therefore, employ mayik chronology in matters like these.

     

    ===

    - direct quote of words written IN ENGLISH by Thakura Bhaktivinoda in his book Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu, His Life and Precepts

     

    Thakura Bhaktivinoda says souls start out "between the chit jagat and mayik jagat". That is, in a tatastha state where they are "compared with separate atomic emanations of the burning fire".

     

    From there, some souls choose to go into Vaikuntha. Bhaktivioda wrote: "Those who chose to serve their God were protected from fall by the interference of the hladini attribute of the Supreme chit sakti. They have been admitted as eternal servants of the Deity in various ways."

     

    Those souls enter Vaikuntha as newcomers.

     

    "Those who wanted to enjoy were grasped by maya from the other side."

    - Bhaktivinoda Thakura.

     

    The meaning is very clear. You Iskconions do not accept what Thakura Bhaktivinoda wrote IN ENGLISH in his books. That is your bad decision and choice.


  5.  

    In this way, unlike the gopis who most NEVER fall down even though they have the free will to choose so if they desire, we have foolishly chosen to try and imitate Krishna in Goloka. It is important to understand 90% of the inhabitants in Goloka and Vaikuntha never ever fall down because it is simply their choose to never ‘sub-consciously’ stop ‘thinking’ and ‘dreaming’ of serving Krishna.

     

    Do you think some Gopis fall down from Goloka?

     

    A simple yes or no is what I want.


  6. Quote:

    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.

    However, if they care to read Prabhupada’s books, they will find this material world is ALL the living entities dream, ONLY EXPERIENCED by sub-consciously leaving their real perpetual body in Goloka and then 'entering' the unlimited dream identities or vessels within the dreams of Maha Vishnu...

     

    One can only enter it as a bodiless consciousness after being the living entity sub-consciously leaves Goloka or is projected from their real bodily form in Goloka.. posted by Sarva

    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>

     

     

    You think Gopis in Goloka are dreaming they are enjoying eating bacon and eggs?

     

    And beefsteak?

     

    With a bottle of wine on the side?

     

    Gopis are subconsciously thinking about other things besides Krishna. That is what you say.

     

    Maybe for a spot of relaxation the Gopis are coming into material life so they can be watching Oprah on TV? Is it so?

     

    You also forgot to give your explanation about why the Gopis who were saying "I am Krishna" must fall down into material life. Your Iskcon idea is that those Gopis become dogs, hogs, camels. It is so, isn't it?

     

    You Iskcon people are nuts.


  7. Iskcon's philosophy is very similar to mayavada

     

    Mayavada says this world is an illusion and that our self is always transcendental brahma.

     

    Iskcon says this world is an illusion and that our self is always in Goloka. Same thing.

     

    If everyone is in Goloka already then why bother with the internet. Just do your japam and shut your mouth because nobody neads to hear your words since every soul is already an uttoma mahapurusha and nobody is really starving or sick or stupid. In your philosophy you say I am already a Goloka-bhasi so if I am then why give me a lecture about Iskconism. Bye bye.


  8.  

    Nitya prema bhakti is there in everyone's heart.TRUE.

    MAhaprabhuji's statement is faultless.

    But it denotes the Sambhanda between Sri Krsna and Jeeva.

    "Abhideya,Sambandha Prayojana"

     

    it doesn't mean that Jeevas fall out of the Spiritual sky just like that.

    It demeans the factual perfect position of Vaikuntha/Goloka,etc.

     

    plz address my earlier question.....

     

     

    If you claim that Jeevatma gets BORED in Goloka,then you automatically mean to say that Sri Krsna is just like Rasa gulla.After you eat enough,you want to enjoy something else.

     

     

    I CANNOT digest this.

     

    No soul ever falls from Vaikuntha or Goloka.

     

    You are right Ranjeet but they will never agree.


  9.  

    Srila Prabhupada: So, even in the Vaikuntha, if I desire that--"Why shall I serve Krishna? Why not become Krishna?"--I immediately fall down.

     

     

    Sometimes the Gopis think "I am Krishna"

     

    But they don't fall down into material life. Not even in their dreams.

     

    According to Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu the Gopis are the greatest devotees of Krishna. The Gopis expressions of bhakti presented in the Bhagavat are all divine. And we see in Srimad Bhagavat that in their madness of divine love the Gopis sometimes think "I am Krishna" and in the Bhagavat nowhere does it say that the Gopis were punished for thinking "I am Krishna". Your Iskcon sampradaya is saying things that are different from what Srimad Bhagavat is teaching.

     

     

    After searching for Krsna here and there, when the gopis became fatigued, they began to talk like madwomen. They could only satisfy themselves by imitating the different pastimes of Krsna. One of them imitated the demon, Putana, and one of them imitated Krsna and sucked her breast. One gopi imitated a hand-driven cart, and another gopi lay down beneath the cart and began to throw up her legs, touching the wheels of the cart, as Krsna did to kill the demon Sakatasura. They imitated child Krsna, lying down on the ground, and one gopi became the demon Trnavarta and carried the small child Krsna by force into the sky; and one of the gopis began to imitate Krsna while He was attempting to walk, ringing His ankle bells. Two gopis imitated Krsna and Balarama, and many others imitated Their cowherd boy friends. One gopi assumed the form of Bakasura, and another forced her to fall down as the demon Bakasura did when he was killed; similarly, another gopi defeated Vatsasura. Just as Krsna used to call His cows by their different names, so the gopis imitated Him, calling the cows by their respective names. One of the gopis began to play on a flute, and another praised her the way Krsna's boy friends praised Him while He played on His flute. One of the gopis took another gopi on her shoulders, just as Krsna used to take His boy friends. Absorbed in thoughts of Krsna, the gopi who was carrying her friend began to boast that she was Krsna herself: "All of you just see my movement!" One of the gopis raised her hand with her covering garments and said, "Now don't be afraid of torrents of rain and severe hurricanes. I'll save you!" In this way she imitated the lifting of Govardhana Hill. One gopi forcibly put her feet on the head of another gopi and said, "You rascal Kaliya! I shall punish you severely. You must leave this place. I have descended on this earth to punish all kinds of miscreants!" Another gopi told her friends, "Just see! The flames of the forest fire are coming to devour us. Please close your eyes, and I shall immediately save you from this imminent danger."

     

     

    In your Iskcon philosophy do you think those gopis who were madly thinking about Krishna and thinking "I am Krsna" will fall down from Goloka and become dogs, hogs, camels. This is your Iskcon thinking is it not?

     

    You Iskcon people are so arrogant that you want to teach everyone what is Krishna bhakti but your teachings are totally different from what is taught by Sukdev in the Bhagavat.


  10.  

    #3 -- Iskcon is a monastic entity meant to be filled by those with seniority in Bhakti-yoga.

    <!-- / message -->

    I have never seen any Iskcon like that. In the Iskcon I saw the seniority is gained by material activity. Material activity you do with your body or brain. Like memorizing cliches and speaking cliches. Even a lifeless computer can repeat words - that memorizing is not bhakti if you are doing it just so you can progress "up the ladder" in Iskcon. I have seen the swamis criticizing non-Iskcon people who are called karmis or mayavadis. I have been told I should do the copy-cat dancing, where you imitate the leg-swing dancing style you see the other Iskcon people doing. I have seen men with tilok making loud noises with squeeze box noise machines and imitating the sound of bhajans by singing in opera-style with your voice. That iskcon I have seen.

     

    What sort of bhakti yoga is being practiced when the Iskcon men are preaching to the guests? I have seen the temple leaders preaching and then coming to the conclusion of their lecture which is that they start talking about money. They start asking for money and taking money. People come to the temple to give a donation and get some good karma and it is just like worship of some demigod - you make an offering and get good luck for yourself and Iskcon is promoting that belief. The givers and the takers are all thinking about their own benefit and I don't see any bhakti there at all. Only a reflection of bhakti like a backwards image in a mirror.

     

    I have seen how the temple devotees get together in the morning and cheer "Jaya" for each other for collecting so many points (dollars) when they were doing scam-kirtan the day before. Thanks for your sales-pitch and your positive impression of the Iskcon corporation. But no thanks I'm not someone who will ever be involved as a contributor to that guru franchise system.


  11.  

    There is only one hindu nation because hindus never undertook to preach or convert.The first missionary activities started with budhism,which spread even to alexandria and china.

     

    Hindus always belived that spirituality is for a chosen few(truth seekers) while commoners were advised to follow dharma and merit gaining rituals(punya karma).They also had this broad universal outlook which made them realise that all paths ,if properly adhered to, is essentially true.That is why hindus accepted budda as god,even though he criticised vedas,wheras jews killed jesus just because he said something new!!That is why the original persians(zorastrianism by faith)found home only in india.Its due to same cause that the tormented jews were left untouched in this country .Even now,in modern times india has shown its broadness by accepting tibetan buddhists in their soceity.

     

    It is indeed a miracle that the hindus have survived such various onslaughts without a preaching mechanism.

     

    It is testimony to the truth that they are indeed lords chosen ones.

     

    This is beautiful. Thanks.


  12.  

    Christian preachers are sure people who do not change over to their view are hellbound. Hare Krishnas think and believe that they found the holy grail in iskcon and everyone else is a second class citizen for not changing over to their view. Since I have not found over-zealous preachers in other beliefs, I do not have a third example.

     

    You are very funny. Well said!

     

    You did forget Islam, by the way.

     

    Islamic fundamentalism (Quran), Christian fundamentalism (Testaments), Iskcon fundamentalism (Prabhupada's books).

     

    There are these three groups of zealot preachers.


  13. The Gaudiyas text Brahma Samhita mentions worship of the 5 forms of the Absolute: Durga, Surya, Sri Ganesha, Shiva and Vishnu.

     

    Thakura Bhaktivinoda wrote about this worship also, and said it is proper religious activity to worship God who is revealed to us according to our spiritual capacity. Some see Ma Durga as Mother of the Universe, like is described in Devi Bhagavat. Some see Shiva is in the mind of Durga and how Shiva is beyond Maya and the world too. Some souls see Ganesha as the perfect image of all our souls, for he is born of Ma and he is the leader of the Gana (masses of people in the world). Some see Surya as the symbol energizing force behind nature, and worship Surya with Gayatri mantra om bhu bhuvah svah tat savitur varenyam bhargo devasya dhimahi ... Some souls worship Vishnu because Vishnu is situated in Parampadam and he is preserving all our lives. This is what Thakura Bhaktivinoda writes in his book.


  14.  

    In sri vaishnavism or vishishtadavaita, it is argued that souls are created by Vishnu. They are not beginingless.

    You misrepresent Visistadvaita

     

    Souls are not created by Vishnu. It never happened! Where has any Srivaishnava Acharya said souls are not beginningless? This idea "souls are created" is directly contradicted by so many statements in Sri Gita, Upanishad, Brahmasutra and so forth.

     

    You say, "it is argued". Who said that? No Srivaishnava Acharya ever said like that. Do any present Srivaishnava Acharyas such as Sri Varadayatirajajeer or Sri Chinnajeeyar say like that? They never would!


  15.  

    :)

     

    Ok, let me explain for those who did not understand my original question. So in this scenario, there was the Lord Sri Krishna and then there was Uddhava who he was teaching to. This doesn't sound right for non-dualism. 'Teaching' consists of a 'Teacher' and the 'taught'. If Sri Krishna is God and nothing else exists other than Him, who was he teaching to? to a person? or to Himself?

     

    Sri Krishna teaches Advaita philosophy to Uddhava in Srimad Bhagavat 11.28.19

     

    <!-- BEGIN TEMPLATE: bbcode_quote --> Quote:

    <table border="0" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" width="100%"> <tbody><tr> <td style="border: 1px solid rgb(102, 102, 102); padding-left: 3ex; padding-right: 3ex;" bgcolor="#e0e0e0"> Originally Posted by Krishna

    Gold remains gold both before and after ornaments are made of it. It only gets different names such as ring or necklace. Similarly, the Reality, the Cause of creation, is the same both before and after worldly objects receive their various names and forms.

    </td> </tr> </tbody></table>

     

    Krishna says that though we perceive differences in nature, in reality we are only giving names and we are only perciving imaginary differences. In reality, THE PERMANENT TRUTH IS BEYOND OUR MIND AND IT IS JUST THE MIND THAT IS DIFFERENCE-PERCEIVING.

     

    This is not my opinion. This is the teaching of Krishna to Uddhava.

     

    Everyone and everything is part of Sriman Narayana. This is the teaching of Vaishnava Acaryas such as Sri Ramanuja, and Sri Sridhar Swami who Chaitanya Mahaprabhu said gave the proper commentary to Vedanta. The name Vishnu means all-pervading. He is all in all . As this verse says:

     

     

    <table border="0" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" width="100%"> <tbody><tr> <td style="border: 1px solid rgb(102, 102, 102); padding-left: 3ex; padding-right: 3ex;" bgcolor="#e0e0e0"> Ito nrsimhah parato nrsimho

    Yato yato yami tato nrsimho

    Bahir nrsimho hrdaye nrsimho

    Nrsimham adim saranam prapadye

     

    Wherever I go Nrsimha is there. He is in the heart and is outside as well. I surrender to Lord Nrsimha, the origin of all things and the supreme refuge.

    </td> </tr> </tbody></table>

    <!-- END TEMPLATE: bbcode_quote -->

    This type of view of God is called Advaita. Vasistha-Advaita, Suddha-Advaita.

     

    Sanatkumara said to king Prithu

     

     

    <table border="0" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" width="100%"> <tbody><tr> <td style="border: 1px solid rgb(102, 102, 102); padding-left: 3ex; padding-right: 3ex;" bgcolor="#e0e0e0">I take refuge in that everlasting Reality which is always free and unpolluted, beyond the mire of material qualities. The perception of a snake in a flower garland is only perception of an apparent fact and not a real fact, a perception that vanishes when the correct understanding of the garland arises. Similarly the perception of worldly objects, which is but an empirical perception, ceases as soon as the correct knowledge of the Absolute dawns on us.

     

    Bhagavatam 4.22.38

     

    (translation by Dr K Bharadvajan, of Ramanuja sampraday) </td> </tr> </tbody></table>

     

     

     

    <table border="0" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" width="100%"> <tbody><tr> <td style="border: 1px solid rgb(102, 102, 102); padding-left: 3ex; padding-right: 3ex;" bgcolor="#e0e0e0">Bhaktivedanta VedaBase: Śrīmad Bhāgavatam 12.5.5

     

     

    ghaṭe bhinne ghaṭākāśa

    ākāśaḥ syād yathā purā

    evaḿ dehe mṛte jīvo

    brahma sampadyate punaḥ

     

    SYNONYMS

    ghaṭea pot; bhinne — when it is broken; ghāṭa-ākāśaḥ — the sky within the pot; ākāśaḥ — sky; syāt — remains; yathāas; purā — previously; evam — similarly; dehe — the body; mṛte — when it is given up, in the liberated condition; jīvaḥ — the individual soul; brahma — his spiritual status; sampadyate — attains; punaḥ — once again.

     

     

    TRANSLATION

     

     

    When a pot is broken, the portion of sky within the pot remains as the element sky, just as before. In the same way, when the gross and subtle bodies die, the living entity within resumes his spiritual identity.

    </td> </tr> </tbody></table>

    Alternatively:

    In the same way, when the gross and subtle bodies die, the living entity within is Brahman, as always.

     

     

    <!-- END TEMPLATE: bbcode_quote -->


  16.  

    Well yes, things have bcome very cheap these days - go to Goloka and next day - come back to the killing of cows and having barbecue with karmi friends.

    Therefore I said this kind of spirituality doesn't attract conditioned souls to become Vaishnavas, therefore the temples are empty and about of being closed.

     

    I think Swami Prabhupada was a great soul who Krishna sent to America to help the foreign people become Vaishnavas. It is unfortunate his foreign devotees are making up new beliefs that are not taught in the scriptures of the Goswamis.


  17. So if a cowherd boy wants to sit on Krishna's shoulders and beat Krishna in a wrestling fight, sometimes Krishna will encourage that as part of his play, and sometimes that other boy's ego or desire to be superior to Krishna will be the cause of his downfall. His desire to sit on Krishna's shoulders will mean he gets an experience of mortal life. Krishna will randomly allow some boys to sit in his shoulder while other boys get sent to hell.

     

    What Krishna really needs is for you Iskconians to go and do sankirtan in Goloka and warn all the cowherds not to play too rough with Krishna. Warn them! If they play too rough they will go to hell.

     

    I can just imagine it. Life in the perfect world where everyone is perfectly fearful all the time. Fearful that if they do any sin they will have to fall and suffer karma once again.

     

    Iskcon-Goloka. The re-formed Goloka. The future Goloka where all the souls are full of fear of God because they see the Iskcon mind-controll team that is always roaming around and warning everyone "don't do that!" and "don't do that"

     

    Excuse me, but I will pass on that. I am looking, as I said, looking for a better heaven than your Iskcon heaven. The one that Sri Chaitanya taught about is much more appealing. Let me go there. You can have Iskcon-Goloka for yourselves.


  18.  

    LEAD; FOLLOW; or GET OUT OF THE WAY!

     

    PS: I don't think you are being fortright with you opinions.

    Who should I follow? If I follow Iskcon I will go to a place like Devaloka where Indra resides. A world from which I can fall back into this world of samsara.

     

    Excuse me but I don't wish to go to your heaven. I am looking for a higher heaven.


  19.  

    [Think like a human person.

    It's similar to the principle:

    "Fool me once shame on you;

    Fool me twice shame on me"

    --after gaining knowledge that required lifetimes transpiring through

    'phantom-time-scale' eons ages after ages,

    one becomes enlightened,

    enlightened to our predicament,

    enlightened to our stupidity,

    enlightened to why the lessons Mom & Pop thought where best for our happiness --being Spiritually Mature means we've sowed our wild oats and then transcended petty adolescent prissy behavior.

    Senority is truely senority is absolute senority is the means of ranking levels in Krishna's posse aka entourage.]

    Sarva and Bhaktajan have different ideas here.

     

    Sarva says a person can fall down from Goloka again and again and again (etc)

     

    Bhaktajan believes you don't fall a second time, you only fall from Goloka once.

     

    What then of the statement by Krishna in the Gita (8.21

     

    It directly contradicts your Iskcon ideas

     

     

     

     

    avyakto ’kshara ity uktas

    tam ahuh paramam gatim

    yam prapya na nivartante

    tad dhama paramam mama

     

    "That which the Vedantists describe as unmanifest and infallible, that which is known as the supreme destination, that place from which, having attained it, one never returns—that is My supreme abode."

     

     

     

     

    commentary of Sri Ramanuja to Bg. 8.21:

     

    Lord Krishna now reveals His superior conscious avyakta or unmanifest which is different in principle and substance then the unconscious avyakta or unmanifest of Brahma which is non-intelligent and operates according to set parameters. Lord Krishna's superior avyakta is characterised by eternality due to its possession atma tattva or soul realisation. Thus it is also characterised by jnana or consciousness. Avyakta is also known as indistinct because it beyond any perceptive faculty of the mind or senses to cognise it as a perceivable reality. The purport is that avyakta is a principle of self-consciousness and as such is completely unique in its nature. The word sanatanah meaning eternal because His supreior avyakta is not subject to combination and aggregation or resolution and disintegration and never disperses or dissipates when all the material elements of earth, water, fire, air and ether in there rudimental forms and derivative forms dissolve away although His superior avyakta abides within them. This is why the Vedic scriptures call it avyakta or indistinct as well as aksara or indestructible. Those steeped in the wisdom of the Vedic scriptures have declared that this is the paramam gatim or supreme exalted goal to be achieved. Lord Krishna previously mentioned aksara in verse three of this chapter and will later mention it again in chapters XII.III and XV.XVI.

     

     

    The superior state of avyakta is where atma tattva or soul realisation abounds and when once reached immediately precludes forever the subjection to union with matter again as there is no more rebirth for reincarnation has been terminated. Lord Krishna specifies their destination with the words dhama paramam mama meaning His supreme personal abode of eternity, knowledge and bliss where all things reciprocate fully with Him and is the abode of the liberated beings. The word dhama also denotes luminosity as in the light of consciousness which is the primary attribute of the atma or soul. Thus Lord Krishna is indicating His paramam dhama as non-different from the infinite consciousness of the atma in contrast to the limited state of consciousness one possesses who is oblivious to the atma due to being deluded by the illusory material energy known as maya and cherishing the association of the senses with sense objects. The other avyakta where resides praktiti or the material substratum which contains all living entities and which is perishable is controlled by Lord Krishna as well through His manifestation as the eternal atma or soul within the etheric heart of all created beings throughout all existence. This is the abode of the non-liberated beings. From the superior avyakta there is no return to samsara the cycle of birth and death. The next verse will show how the goal of the jnani or knower of the Supreme Lord is the most sublime state of consciousness, more exalted than any other.

     

     

    Pardon me, but I choose to follow teachings different from your Iskcon ideas


  20. If you believe in these types of ideas then good luck to you. The soul is free to do as she chooses. I never had any connection with Swami Prabhupada or the Iskcon movement and I'm not a believer in that.

     

    Whether or not Swami Prabhupada taught this idea you claim he taught is a topic other people might want to discuss with you. But I'm not interested. Your opinions are anti-Vedic.

     

    I prefer to believe in the direct statements of Sri Krishna who said, "One who reaches my eternal abode will never return to this material world" and "My devotee will never perish".

     

    Only deluded people will think the associates of Krishna such as the Gopis in Goloka can fall into ignorance and become centipedes, pigs and spiders. Your claim that the Gopis only fall "in their dreams" is equally absurd. The pain a person feels in a dream is just as real as the pain we feel in waking life. You are trying to teach us that the Gopis can feel material pain. But what you are trying to teach is a sinful idea. People who think like this are like obsessive and disturbed people who are haunted by nasty, offensive thoughts. Nama-aparadha, Vaishnava-aparadha, Guru-aparadha. You are preachers of offensive ideas, you people who are preaching that Krishna doesn't protect his beloved associates from suffering and material existence. You people who believe this sort of nonsense really are very unfortunate.


  21.  

    Because of free will any marginal living entity can fall down, that is why we are called marginal. But great souls like Prabhupada, even though technically due to free will, as Prabhupada says, they can also fall down, they NEVER do because they choose not to miss use that free will and always remain Krsnas servant.

     

     

    How do you know Prabhupada is in the group of souls who can never fall down?

     

    What is the word in Sanskrit for associates of Krishna who will never fall down? It is nitya-siddha. But you say any nitya-siddha can fall. Your circular logic is ridiculous.

×
×
  • Create New...