anandagiri

AGAIN: MICKEY MOUSE INVADES! BLACK AND WHITE......REALIZATION YES OR REALIZATION NO......KUNDALINI YES OR KUNDALINI NO. TODAY YOU ARE 3 FOOT NOTHING KID AND TOMORROW YOU ARE SIX FOOT NOTHING WISE MAN. SURE! THERE IS NO GROWTH PROCESS? NO INTERMEDIARY STAGES OR CONDITIONS? COME ON ALREADY! KUNDALINI IS MERELY A MECHANISM IN A NATURAL PROCESS. IT ALWAYS OCCURS UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES - WHETHER IT IS WELL AND CONSCIOUSLY PERCEIVED AS SUCH OR NOT. IT CAN PRODUCE SPIRITUAL REALIZATION IF THE PREVIOUS PREPARATION WAS ADEQUATE........AND IT CAN BE LITTLE MORE THAN A "ONE NIGHT STAND" IN THE END. AS WELL, IT CAN PRODUCE CERTAIN PROBLEMS. IT ALL DEPENDS UPON YOUR PREPARATION AND THE NATURAL INCLINATION OF YOUR MIND AND HEART. YEP, YOU HEARD RIGHT: I DID INCLUDE HEART. BUT THAT DOES MEAN WE ARE BACK TO THE OLD TIME RELIGION AND MERELY "GETTING SAVED" IN ONE SENSE OR ANOTHER......TRUE BHAKTI OR TRUE LOVE CAN, OF COURSE, BRING SPIRITUAL REALIZATION -- WHICH WILL HAVE INVOLVED KUNDALINI ACTIVITY. BUT FEW REALLY UNDERSTAND WHAT THAT MEANS AND INVOLVES! IT IS NOT THE EASIEST AND SIMPLEST PATH AT ALL! IT IS THE MOST DIFFICULT AND DANGEROUS.....THAT IS WHY THERE EXISTED LOVELY PICNICS LIKE THE SPANISH INQUISITION, POGROMS, CRUSADES AND SO ON......AND IN A LESSER WAY AS SEEN IN SOME OF THE EARLIER CONTRIBUTIONS I HAVE BEEN LOOKING AT. LORDY LORDY! GROW UP, KIDS, THERE IS A WONDERFUL WORLD OF DIVINE JOY AWAITING PEOPLE WHO CAN THROW AWAY THEIR CRUTCHES AND THEIR MOMMY´S BREAST MILK. AND THAT WAS THE WAY VASISHTHA TAUGHT IT, AND PATANJALI AND THE SHANKARACHARYA OF KANCHIPURAM ALSO. THE GOAL DOES EXIST......AND IT IS DO-ABLE......BUT YOU GOTTA GET YOUR ACT TOGETHER! AGB

IT IS SO NICE AND COZY TO JUST "BELIEVE" IN JESUS OR BUDDHA OR SIVA OR KRISHNA, DO YOUR RITUALS AND HAVE FAITH THAT YOUR SINCERITY WILL MAGICAL TAKE YOU TO HEAVEN OR WAKEN YOUR KOOOOONDALINI! THEN YOU HAVE IT MADE. GROW UP! THE BEST IS NOT SO "CHEAP"........AND YET IT SHOULD BE....IF YOU REALLY KNEW WHAT YOU ARE ABOUT! BUT YOU OBVIOUSLY DO NOT! WELL, MAYBE IN A COUPLE MORE INCARNATIONS............AND WHERE IN GOD´S NAME DID YOU DIG UP THAT CRAP ABOUT TANTRA BEING ARTIFICIAL? OR THE LEFT HAND PATH BEING A CORRUPTION? IT IS ALL PART OF THE REALITY! THE MAYA COVERED ATMAN (FOR THE MOMENT!) DECIDES WHAT IT WANTS.....AND THAT MAY INVOLVE WISE CHOICES OR INCONVENIENT ONES......LIKE EVERYTHING ELSE IN LIFE, GUYS!!!! WAKE UP! TANTRA IS THE OLD VEDIC WAY OF REFERRING TO THE AGAMAS........AND AGAMA MEANS "THE BEGINNING OF IT ALL"..........THE OLDEST, DEEPEST AND MOST POTENT PARTS OF YOGIC SCIENCE. YOU CHOOSE, AND YOU GETS WHAT YOU CHOOSES! AS ALWAYS! A SINCERE DEDICATION TO STUDY THE MOST ANCIENT SCRIPTURES ALWAYS ENDS UP WITH SUFFICIENT TRUTH TO THE COURAGEOUS TO GAIN THE SAME RESULTS AS USUAL: SPIRITUAL REALIZATION, GRADUALLY AND MORE AND MORE. THIS IS THE WAY TO LEARN DISCRIMINATION IF YOU ARE NOT TOO EMOTIONALLY INSECURE TO DO SO, WITHOUT CRUTCHES. NOTHING IS ARTIFICIAL AND EVERYTHING IS ARTIFICIAL, DEPENDING ON ONE´S LEVEL OF SPIRITUAL EVOLUTION....ARE YOU AUTHENTICALLY DIVYA BHAVA OR VIRA BHAVA OR.....PASHU BHAVA? BUT AT LEAST LEARN TO BE HONEST AND ADULT! AGB

What I See Here Is A Lot Of Confusion. Stop Dogmatically Using Academic Crutches! If You Really Have Something Inside Besides A Bunch Of Clever Thoughts And Ideas, There Should Be No Problems Here At All! It Should Never Be A Question Of Vishnu Or Siva! First: Academically, Vishnu Should Not Be Confused With Mahavishnu! Second: Siva Is Not Siva Here. The Story Stuff Related To Siva, In Reality, Is A Customary Way Of Dealing With Rudra. Trimurti, That Is To Say, Is Brahmaa, Vishnu And Rudra. First Of All, Preliminary For The Harikrishnas In The Audience: Get Real! The Simple Definition Of Brahman Is Simply That Beyond Which Nothing Can Exist, By Definition! Brahman Is "god" Beyond The Context Of The Possibility Of The Existence Of A Creation. Siva Is Brahman Within The Context Of The Possibility Of The Existence Of A Creation - But There Still Is No Creation. That Is Why His "consort" Is Uma Here. Ishwara Is Brahman Within Context Of The Existence Of A Creation, Although Totally Transcendental With Respect To That Creation, Of Course. His "consort" Is Merely The Feminine Form Of "himself": Ishwari. Durga Means "the Inaccessible" For Good Reasons! She Is The Inaccessible Made Accessible. It Makes Sense When One Understands The True Nature Of Creation Itself. That Cannot Be Gone Into At This Moment, Though Essentially It Is Very Simple. Durga Is A Manifestation Of Ishwari Within The Creation. And Ishwari, Beyond Habits Of Custom, Is - As Brahman - Neither Saiva Nor Vaishnava. She Is Brahman! It Can´t Happen? Of Course It Can´t! But, When You Come Right Down To It, In Terms Of Our Normal Human Possibilities, The Creation Can´t Happen Either! The Thing Is That, As I Said, The Creation Is Not What People Think It Is. And Don´t Give Me A Bunch Of That Popularized Neo-advaita Crap On This Either! People Have Confused Adi-sankara A Whole Lot! And Ramana Maharishi Also....who Was A Great Saint, But Not Totally Jivan-mukta. And Forget That Very Sincere But Confused, Because Limited Without Posibilities For The Moment, That Guinea Pig, Krishnamurti. He Was Very Sincere, But He Did Untold Damage To Many People!.....besides The Good That He Did Do In Making A Lot Of Them At Least Wake Up A Bit. Agb