Tarun Posted January 28, 2005 Author Report Share Posted January 28, 2005 kRtsna prasaktir niravayavatva zabda vyAkopo vA entire, wholesale; employment, involvement; formless, indivisible; revelation, text; to cause to appear to be stupid, contradiction, invalidation, negation, stultification, violation 162) Either jIva’s entirely absorbed in every action or else this violates text stating jIva’s sans parts. ---------------------- zrutes tu zabda mUlatvAt from scripture, due to revelation; but word/sound; because of root 163) However, above defects don’t apply in Brahman’s case, for scriptures so declare it, and God’s word alone is root from which we learn anything about these transcendental subjects. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 4, 2005 Report Share Posted February 4, 2005 logged in twice, still no dice === Atmani caivaM vicitrAz ca hi In Self, in Lord; and thus; diverse, manifold; furthermore certainly well known 164) Hence Self’s power, so many forms visibly emanating. Kalpa-vRxa = desire tree; cintAmaNi = philosopher’s stone svapaxe doSAc ca In one’s own view, opponent’s theory = jIva creative agent; from faults too Very subtle point. 165) Same objections similarly applicable against jIva being creative agent, ergo unacceptable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarun Posted February 17, 2005 Author Report Share Posted February 17, 2005 sarvopetA ca tad darzanAt all powers endowed with, affix tRc, crude form 'upetR'; and alone; that = such power possession; from sight, realization 166) Lord alone possesses all power, for it is seen so in text. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarun Posted February 22, 2005 Author Report Share Posted February 22, 2005 vikaraNatvAn neti cet tad uktam from sense organs' absence; not thus if; that objection; explained, answered 167) If one objects Brahman can't b creations' agent, not possessing senses, then reply this objection's already met by scripture itself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarun Posted February 25, 2005 Author Report Share Posted February 25, 2005 na prayojanavat tvAt = = not being endowed with motive Lord has no inclination towards creation, for he has no motive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarun Posted March 1, 2005 Author Report Share Posted March 1, 2005 lokavat tu lIlA kaivalyam as in world, as in daily life; but sport merely Lord's urge to create world is mere sport only, as we commonly c. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarun Posted March 2, 2005 Author Report Share Posted March 2, 2005 vaizamya nairghRNyena na sApexatvAt tathA hi darzayati inequality, bias; cruelty not; with respect to creature's karma; so certainly; Holy Books reveal 170) Lord is beyond partiality & cruelty. JIvas' joy & pain is due to their karma; scriptures do declare this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarun Posted March 17, 2005 Author Report Share Posted March 17, 2005 na karmAvibhAgAd iti cen nAnAditvAt not jIvas' actions; from non-distinction thus; if not from beginningless Karma Theory cannot explain (inequality & cruelty seen in universe), for upon creation, at first there was no distinction between souls, neither of their karmas nor karma-phalani. This objection is invalid, however, for creation knows no beginning. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 20, 2005 Report Share Posted April 20, 2005 what is mahite? <font color="red"> </font color> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarun Posted April 26, 2005 Author Report Share Posted April 26, 2005 upapadyate cA'py upalabhyate ca Although coded, do notice its rhyme & rhythm. reasonable, as in GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), not too far-fetched and verifiable, with precedent, zAstrik; plus, both 172) Supreme Lord's partiality towards His/Her/Their bhaktas is both understandable & easily referenced, observable in scripture as well as daily life. "Wow! That was a close on." Brings to mind ZrI kRSNa's famous nondual yet dual GItA zloka: samo'ham sarva-bhuteSu... His Divine Grace - ziromaNi, descending thru paramparA Our 6th grade teacher Molly Reff forced us to join her "We Never Guess We Look It Up" club. Same idea. Question: in English can we say referable, meaning easy to search out? Meanwhile let's refect via mahA-prasAd. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarun Posted May 10, 2005 Author Report Share Posted May 10, 2005 sarva-dharmopapattez ca all qualities; due to reason, proved & provable 173) From another perspective, id est, the BIG PICTURE, Brahman includes all natures, no matter how conflicting, ergo to all He renders justice, yet He leans toward His self-surrendered dearmost. ps - become one of them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarun Posted May 13, 2005 Author Report Share Posted May 13, 2005 racanAnupapatez ca nAnumAnam construct, due to impossibility; and not; In ferred One = PradhAna = world as proof of PradhAna's not causing material world, for it's impossible for her to have created universe (having nop intelligence). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarun Posted May 16, 2005 Author Report Share Posted May 16, 2005 pravRttez ca = from activity, and/only 175) And inert matter moves only due to intelligent direction. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarun Posted May 18, 2005 Author Report Share Posted May 18, 2005 payo'mbu vac cet tatrApi milk, water, as if, there too If it b said pradhAn in & of herself transforms, variegates into milk, water sans conscious direction, Veda replies diligent supervision guides all changes. Matter is inert. Didn't Jesus says: "Beware the movement of earth" IOW, don't rebuild WTC just yet. I walked by WTC yesterday. No need to rush. Beware b4 u move any earth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarun Posted May 25, 2005 Author Report Share Posted May 25, 2005 vyatirekAnavasthitez cAnapextvAt in absence, due to non-necessity; and due to independence 177) As pre-creation, there was no other cause save & except PradhAn, so there would/could b no other need for any other cause than PradhAn Herself to produce Her changes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarun Posted June 8, 2005 Author Report Share Posted June 8, 2005 anyatrA'bhAvAc ca na tRNAdivat elsewhere, abhAvAt = from absence; and only not; as grass 178) Unlike grass' transformation (when cow-eaten), beacause when bull-eaten such transformation is absent. tRNAdapi sunicena... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarun Posted June 9, 2005 Author Report Share Posted June 9, 2005 abhyupagame'py arthAbhAvAt even if it b accepted; purpose, from absence 179) Even if one believes PradhAn self-initiates activity, such theory remains useless, for it serves no end. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarun Posted June 10, 2005 Author Report Share Posted June 10, 2005 puruSAzmavad iti cet tathApi man, magnetic stone like, thus if, so also If it b thought PrakRti progenerates as lame directing blind, or as magnet moves iron, even then such hypothesis remains objectionable. "I abject" & rightly so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarun Posted June 16, 2005 Author Report Share Posted June 16, 2005 Can anyone please further elaborate on this sUtra!? angittvAnupapattez ca angittva = relation of being principal; due to impossibility, unreasonableness; and 181) Impossible that any one guNa may b principal in 'pralaya' state, hence material world would not originate. Can anyone explain this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarun Posted June 17, 2005 Author Report Share Posted June 17, 2005 anyathAnumitau ca jnazakti-viyogAt otherwise, in case of inference, and jna = intelligence, power, from missing, being destitute of 182) Even though sometimes contrarily inferred, PradhAn cannot create, for it possesses NOT personality, id est, it's no conscious being. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarun Posted June 21, 2005 Author Report Share Posted June 21, 2005 vipratiSedhAc cAsamanjasam from contradiction, plus, asamanjasam = disharmony, objection 183) Due to Sankhya philosophy's inconsistencies, it remains untenable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarun Posted June 24, 2005 Author Report Share Posted June 24, 2005 mahad dIrghavad vA hrasva parimaNDalAbhyAm having magnitude; having extension, perceptible; as, or/and; short, binary, sub-atomic molecule, particle; from atomic 184) And as origin of big & long from short = dimensionless & atomic = sizeless is untenable, so is VaizeSik's entire system. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarun Posted June 30, 2005 Author Report Share Posted June 30, 2005 ubha yathApi na karmAtas tad abhAvaH in both ways, not motion; ataH = ergo; that's absence Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarun Posted July 1, 2005 Author Report Share Posted July 1, 2005 ubha yathApi na karmAtas tad abhAvaH in both ways, not motion; ataH = ergo; it's absence 185) Assuming either (whether adRSTa in atom or soul), both r motionless. Consequently, world's origination's not there = absent. ===================== samavAyAbhyupagamAc ca sAmyAd anavasthiteH concomitant cause - VaizeSik lingo/term; from acceptance, acknowledgement; and from equality, parity; from non-finality - regressus ad infinitum 186) VaizeSik doctrine is untenable, for it accepts (fictitious) relation called SamayAya from which results by parity of reasoning infinite regress. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarun Posted July 6, 2005 Author Report Share Posted July 6, 2005 nityam eva ca bhAvAt eternal even, and from existence 187) This world would b eternal because SamavAya is eternal. Affinity uniting atoms. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.