We never find that a woman was given the post of chief executive

[krsna 3]

 

 

As we learn from the history of the Mahabharata, or "Greater India," the wives and daughters of the ruling class, the ksatriyas, knew the political game, but we never find that a woman was given the post of chief executive. This is in accordance with the injunctions of Manu-samhita, but unfortunately Manu-samhita is now being insulted, and the Aryans, the members of Vedic society, cannot do anything.

 

(Prabhuapda. Srimad-Bhagavatam. 10.4.5 purport)

 

 

[Kulapavana 0]

in the Aryan civilization the ultimate rules are based on actual qualifications and not bodily designation. even in Vedic times kshatriya women would chose their husbands, etc. in Kali-yuga it is all mixed up. As a professional manager I can tell you from personal experience that in general women make poor managers. but it is still better to give such post to a qualified woman than just any man.

[Guest guest]

Presently we see the leaders mostly have become effeminate, having taken on a women's psychology in a male form.

 

I'll take a Maggie Thatcher or Jeanne Kirkpatrick over the limp wristed leaders of today anytime.

[Guest guest]

Cool! Rush Limbaugh visits Audarya Fellowship? Welcome, Maharushie!

[jayaisvara 0]

I think its good that woman are poor in such politics because they are more religious than men and are close to God. A woman is a worshippable being.

[Guest guest]

I believe most women recognize & embrace their spiritual nature more easily than most men. Maybe because of their nurturing nature. But it does seem that when a man is holy, he is really holy.