Tarun 6 Report post Posted February 2, 2002 > I like scrolling around this website, I even liked the crop circle > story, but this one here resonates > http://www.public-action.com/911/psyopnews/index.html > Ralph, maybe you should set these folks straight about robotplanes > http://www.public-action.com/911/robotplane.html > Charles, they're talking about you again. Good work. > Best wishes, John ***** I'm pro-life, against abortion, conservative in many ways. I didn't particular care for WTC architecturally. But 9/11's treachery degree's entirely something else. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tarun 6 Report post Posted February 13, 2002 This one may dig too deep for kaniSThas to fathom. Sorry for any enlightening disturbance. Keep it dim. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tarun 6 Report post Posted February 21, 2002 Malcolm X, PrabhupAd and any other awake, enlightened soul could understand within a second who knocked down WTC 9/11. When dumbers conspire to murder smarters, what do we get? Fool's Paradise ki jaya! Headless Horseman pUjA ki jaya! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Streetstraw 0 Report post Posted October 15, 2002 This Cheney name loudly suggests: "Man of a 1,000 Faces" Cheney: 'Investigators, Keep Out' by Michael Isikoff and Tamara Lipper NEWSWEEK Issue; 21 October, 2002 America's Vice President blocks an independent commission to investigate 9-11 NEWSWEEK -- Dick Cheney played a behind-the-scenes role last week in derailing an agreement to create an independent commission to investigate the 9-11 attacks. Last month the White House endorsed the formation of the panel. But on Thursday, hours after congressional negotiators hailed a final deal over the scope and powers of a 9-11 panel, Cheney called House Intelligence Committee chairman Rep. Porter Goss, sources told NEWSWEEK. Later that day Goss told a closed-door conference committee he couldn't accept the deal, citing instructions from "above my pay grade,'' sources say. Goss later said he was referring to other House leaders, not Cheney. Goss wouldn't discuss his call from the VP but said it wasn't the "determining factor'' in his stand. Cheney's office said the VP's only instruction to Goss was to "keep negotiating,'' and Bushies insist they still hope to hammer out a new deal before Congress goes home this week. One obstacle: subpoena power. Last week's proposed deal would allow any five members of the 10-member panel to subpoena documents, including internal White House intelligence briefs. But White House officials say this would allow congressional Democrats--who will control half the appointees--to "politicize'' the commission. Cheney strongly opposes the idea of any independent body's poking into the White House's conduct. He has repeatedly objected to efforts by a separate joint-intelligence-committee inquiry to obtain documents and interview key witnesses, including an FBI informant who lived with two of the 9-11 hijackers. Bush officials insist the VP's stand is based on "principle,'' not fear of embarrassments. Even some congressional critics tend to agree. "There's just this general philosophical orientation that the less the world knows, the better,'' says one GOP staffer. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
