Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org
Sign in to follow this  
kailasa

Vision of the God

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

As to vision of the God. We see by His eyes sastra, in meditation, as murti and in Vrindavan. The worship Govardhana sila for example has "specificity" that concerning worship actually and is not present and as the qualification as spontaneous fidelity and\or a spiritual body is necessary. Siddha-pranali contains on different sources up to 250 attributes, but Srila Prabhupada writes that the quantity of attires in sambhoga is boundless, thus in the spiritual world all is boundless.

 

Is not present sastra on spontaneous fidelity, as it should to write on everyone devotee, it is a little original - in spontaneous fidelity you should do(make) that that and that. Sastra specifies the basic attributes and moods - BRS. For the same reason and not only as there is no as a rule description of numerous details of events, but the preachers usually develop(unwrap) a picture transferring the message.

 

Why we do not see Êrisna by him because have put itself instead of him. But to see difficultly probably, especially Srila Bhaktivininoda does not advise, to hear much easier. For example BG does not differ from Êrisna, the battle on Êuruksetra as concerns to mathurya to race. Gopi hearing about feats Êrisna, their emotions amplified repeatedly. Gopi did not think - " it not ours Êrisna, it Êrisna Dvaraka, we shall not go on Êuruksetra, we become babadji on spontaneous fidelity "

 

 

And demons (demons?) in Vrindavan killed Êrisna. Having killed Êåsi, Êrisna beat him up to a status of a cloth. Lord Narayana is executed of greatness and so does not work. Understandably that Êrisna played a role of the man, but it was not Lord Narayana, it Êrisna.

 

As to dance race, Srila Prabhupada writes in 2-3 songs - that only unreasonable man can think that that Êrisna enjoyed there. Lord Is perfect in itself and does not depend on one or other society and as that the God is attracted with fidelity, instead of it is simple by a type of the attitudes(relations). The God is necessary to consider a source all and gopi including. The knowledge of greatness of the God only strengthens fidelity in ìàthurya to race. There is sastra concerning what that of the concrete moments ìàthurya of race for example and on misunderstanding who that tries to divide(share) uniform sastra, actually creating a hand-made article into spiritual life.

 

In the neutral relations the person realizes all games and in this sense participates in them. Further "developing" the soul comes in a primary situation from which has fallen. Êrisna a source of soul, but not Lord Ìàha Visnu. In conformity with a situation about < < not fall > > souls, in this case it is a little having received taste of spiritual life, the soul is more never fall. But here fall and from the spiritual world fall. Sometimes sastra speaks that the soul does not fall, but what to make correct performance, as it is more exception, than rule from the point of view of the spiritual world. But from our point of view it already rule.

 

Listened recently to good lecture about fall including. Sadhana devotee fall if not preach, that is the compassions do not show. Sadhana not perfect, but sadhana probably results to êripa as in this example a birdy to have a drink ocean. Though the history that sad - ocean she and has not had a drink. Posted Image

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...