veluthukaran Posted August 26, 2004 Report Share Posted August 26, 2004 even though the means does not follow dharma? can anything be above dharma, even the supreme being? why? point me to sources. then prove your sources come from a being higher than ksri rishna, otherwise why would i be inclined to believe what sri krishna says, when all i have to rely on is Him himself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pankaja_Dasa Posted August 26, 2004 Report Share Posted August 26, 2004 Krishna when He descends does follow the priniciples of Dharma. He used to rise early and meditate {on Himself lol}. He did everything a householder would do. For if He didn't then people would follow His example. What instance are you reffering to in particular? Krishna says in the Bhagavad Gita He is our best friend seated within our hearts. But do we trust Him? No! So Krishna tests your faith 'how much this person trusts me I shall see'. Don't friends in material life do the same? Similar yes but of-cource not the same. By the way nobody is above God. Lord Brahma offers some amazing prayers: http://brahmasamhita.com/5/en1 Go read you'll be glad you did:) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
veluthukaran Posted August 26, 2004 Author Report Share Posted August 26, 2004 thank you, theinstances i refer to take place in the war and the treacherous things done to defeat karna and the kauravas, and the weak reasonings krishna gives to justify them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pankaja_Dasa Posted August 26, 2004 Report Share Posted August 26, 2004 In the Gita it says that Arjuna HAD to fight. After all the 'kauravas' did to them. Still because they are devotees they tolerated so much. This was not normal warefare, it was of epic proportions. Ganga-putra Bhisma is one of the 12 Mahajana's. Yet even he was killed in the Battle. {for he did not try to stop when Dushanan was trying to offend Drapadi} and for this he was killed. Call it favouritism. When Bhisma was fighting so valiently with Arjuna, Krishna was about to break His promise 'not to fight' and was about to kill Bhisma, but Arjuna stopped Him. Krishna went to Karna before battlefield and asked him to declare that he was the Kunti-putra. But he did not as he was oblidged to Duryodhana. So now tell me how weak the reasonings are. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ganeshprasad Posted August 26, 2004 Report Share Posted August 26, 2004 Jai Ganesh Re (Ganga-putra Bhisma is one of the 12 Mahajana's. Yet even he was killed in the Battle. {for he did not try to stop when Dushanan was trying to offend Drapadi} and for this he was killed. Call it favouritism. When Bhisma was fighting so valiently with Arjuna, Krishna was about to break His promise 'not to fight' and was about to kill Bhisma, but Arjuna stopped Him.) You reason ill if you think Bhisma pita was killed, even in this mrityoulok it was his choice to die. He chose the moments to leave in utrayan. Bhisma made Krishna break his promise ready to save Arjun, made him take up weapon as he promised he would, what wonderful lila befitting a great mahajan. Jai Shree Krishna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.