few views

[Guest guest]

dear friends

i am not much into iskon movement.but read the thread in this forum nad felt like expressing few of my views.

generally two views are posted here supporting homosexuality or branding them as perverts,immorals etc.,but i simply dont believe in genrealising the emotions and branding people into groups.if a sexual orientation deviates from the natural laws, biasing the orientation to be perversion is not a real spiritual way.

men have deviated a lot from what nature has taught its living beings to adhere strictly to.and nature itself accepts flexibilty in its generlaisations as its another way of adopting(rite from choosing mutations as a great menas of evolution to adoptations based on the climate ,species behaviour nature has never insulted the parallel ways deviating from general).

so being an orientation right from the ancient times homosexuality cannot be just swept as just a perversion.harmone based biases cannot be blamed with perversion.(yes not strictly harmone based but psychologically based too).abd i really cannot undesrstand y few ppl feel homosexuals spoil kids,exploit others sexually.sexual exploitation is not a tihng confined to a group but almost it prevails in all major classes of society

not all straight guys are sexually pure and not all homosexuals are impure.again it is based on individual moral adherences and not on the sexual orientation they follow.a spiritual life is a search,a search on divine light; on the meaning of immortality with the mortal reasoning ability nature has given humans.so y do we bother about other orientations of people(is that a gay shuld not search anytihng that is spiritual or is that God ,every living being a part of Him,shuts his doors to one class of ppeople).if gayness is treated a misled path and if it really is so, who is not misled everyone is misled in one or other way and if ppl who re misled are to be segregated from spirituality no one can be in.spirituality as equally is a individual experience and search as it is a social movement.so individual feelings and orientations are not to be insulted and segregated on the basis of one's own ethical outlooks.

the other simple tihng i want to say is let u have any kind of spiritual belifes but when u interact with any living being of nature look at it with the love god has given us not with the ideas, the categorising ways,the lines drawn by men.after all love is the best way to surrendering god than anyother way.

thank you.

[Guest guest]

sorry guys

the message is originallyi tohught of threading with another issue that discussed few homosexual issues. the thread was originally closed and i without knowing cliked on new message thinking im continuinig the thread. rather im new to forums.sorry again

[barney]

Dear Guest'

 

Your views are accepted. In fact there is no class where God is concerned. Any one, I mean all class of people can approach God in a manner he desires. Be thy a Gay, Scarlet, Transvestites and all. These class of people did not chose their life but was chosen for them according to their past karmas. May be in their past karma they had abused women and so in this life they have been cast inot this class to realize what is abuse and humilation is all about. But by accepting God and realizing their birth and they wish to make amends so that they will be spared in their next birth. Anyone who says they cannot or would not be allowed to par take in spritual path are fools who do not know what they are talking about.