Dinosaurs

[Guest guest]

Can you please explain whether dinosaurs & human beings existed simultaneuosly? If so is mention about this in Vedas, Puranas etc. Please clarify.

Thanks

Regards,

Astro

[Nitaichandra 0]

As far as I know , Prabhupada said something like that the dinosaurs are not mentioned in the Vedas ( or Puranas , Itihasas , Samhitas ... ) , or that they never existed ( don´t remember exactly ... ) .

 

Whenever asked about this topic , he would often refer to the Timingila fish ...

[Max_ 0]

How do you explain the fossils then?

[Guest guest]

Hare Krishna.

 

Srila Prabhupada mentioned that there are birds which can fly from one planet to the next. Thus there must also be big animals like dinasours.

 

 

[Max_ 0]

Unless you're talking about the Phoenix from Greek mythology or something, than birds can't fly from planet to planet. The air gets too thin and cold when you get up near Earth's atmosphere and you die.

[Guest guest]

Hare krishna.

 

Srila prabhupada stated that the problem with scientists is that they make assumptions based on their senses.

 

The fact is that our senses are very defective, thus we should not make judgement based on our senses.

 

Just because you cannot live in the water, that does not mean nothing can, the fishes can.

 

Just because you can't be a brain surgeon, that does not mean know-one else can.

 

Just because we cannot live on the sun, that does not mean know-one else can. There are living beings in fire and on the sun planet. The Bhagavad-gita was spoken to Vivaswan, the sun king, by Lord Krishna about 120 millions years ago. This is stated in the Bhagavad-gita.

 

It's foolish to make judgements based on our senses. As Srila Prabhupada stated, there are birds which can fly from one planet to the next. Just because you cannot fly that does not mean nothing can, the birds can. In a similar way, there are birds that can actually fly from one planet to the next.

 

There are trillions of planets with living beings, some of them are far more superior then us. We may be one of the dummest humans in the whole of creation.

 

Until about 50 years ago, the scientists used to say it's impossible for living beings to exist at the bottom of the ocean. They are proven wrong.

 

Until about 20-30 years ago, the doctors used to say 'There is nothing wrong with smoking'. Now we know the truth.

 

There are so many other examples like these.

[Guest guest]

 

"Unless you're talking about the Phoenix from Greek mythology or something, than birds can't fly from planet to planet. The air gets too thin and cold when you get up near Earth's atmosphere and you die. "

 

I would die, like you say, but that does not mean there is nothing else that can survive in such extreme conditions.

 

At the bottom of the sea, it's extremely cold and the pressure is very high, a man would die instantly. But that does not mean nothing can live there. There are many living beings living very comfortably at the bottom of the ocean.

 

At high altitudes like the Himalays, a man would die if he stays for a day without oxygen tanks. But there are animals who live there all their lives.

 

There are 8.4 million species of living beings, we haven't seen them all.

[Max_ 0]

My point was . like human skin, let alone bird can can't pass unprotected through Earth's atmosphere and not burn up. That's why you need spaceships made of out metal and such.

[Guest guest]

Hare Krishna.

 

Max you are still basing things on your own perspective. Just because humans cannot withstand high temperatures, that doed not mean nothing can.

 

There are living beings who live in the earth at very high temperatures and living beings living in the ocean at very low temperatures.

 

There are yogis (humans) who can travel from one planet to the next and from one country to another in a few moments.

 

Like for example Narade Muni, he can travel from one planet to another. Just because you can't that does not mean know-one can.

 

[Guest guest]

Hare Krishna.

 

In the Mahabharata, it mentions that Lord krishna took Arjuna to see Maha Vishnu, trillions of miles into space. How did Arjuna go and come back?

 

[Nitaichandra 0]

Maybe the giant bird that is being talked about is Garuda , the carrier of Vishnu .

 

There is a funny little pastime where it is talked about Garuda encountering another devotee-animal-servant of Vishnu who is a snake .

So since birds like to eat snakes , Vishnu or some demigods had to make sure to hide the devotee-snake from Garuda , otherwise ...

[Nitaichandra 0]

I also wondered about theses facts , and how some conclusions are contradicting the theories of today´s scientists .

But looking at Prabhupada´s conversations , one can see that he doesn´t care a lot about bone findings .

 

 

<ul type="square"> Slideshow Discussion, Washington D.C., July 3, 1976

760703SS.WDC

 

Svarupa Damodara: Do we know that in detail, Srila Prabhupada? What type of species are extinct? Not all the species extinct. As it is during Brahma's day, that partial annihilation, devastation, now some species are extinct?

Prabhupada: No species extinct. What you are reading? This is garbage.(?)

Svarupa Damodara: The physical forms.

Prabhupada: No, nothing is extinct. Everything is going on.

Svarupa Damodara: At that point, they are going to come up with the point that "How about dinosaurs?" They are going to ask like that.

Prabhupada: That is imagination, where is dinosaur finding.

Svarupa Damodara: They say they have all the bones.

Prabhupada: No, they are describing maybe another animal. That is existing. That is Timingila, they can swallow up big, big whale fishes. That big, bones, they are living still. Nothing is extinct. They are already there.

Rupanuga: Did these dinosaurs exist, or is it just their imagination?

Prabhupada: The big animal exists. I call it dinosaur or finosaur, that is your choice. Big animals existing. Timingila, I said the name, Timingila, still exist.

Rupanuga: Still exist.

Prabhupada: Oh, yes. They are always existing. Water elephants. There are elephants in water. Everything.

Rupanuga: So there is no such thing as extinction.

Prabhupada: No extinction, there is no question of extinction.

Rupanuga: If these animals were on this planet some millions of years ago, they are still here, is that correct?

Prabhupada: Yes. What do you know what are there within the water? You can take information from the sastras. It is not possible for you to see and go into the water, how big, big animals are there.

Hari-sauri: But it's possible that an animal may disappear from one planet, but still be on another planet, though, like that.

Prabhupada: No.

Hari-sauri: Because they claim that even within recorded history...

Prabhupada: They claim everything. That is... There is no question. Svarupa Damodara: (indistinct) fossil, they are called fossil record. Prabhupada: That is another thing. You can get a dead animal's body, but what is that?

Svarupa Damodara: They claim that many species are extinct.

Prabhupada: How they are extinct?

Hari-sauri: Well, like, they say that within modern history,

Prabhupada: First thing is they are all imperfect speculators. So what is the value of their sport? We don't take any value of it.

Rupanuga: They don't know where these animals are, that's all.

Prabhupada: They, simply like child, they are speculating. If he's

imperfect, then what is the value of his speculation? There is no value.

Svarupa Damodara: But then what happens at the time of partial devastation? At the end of Manu, the partial devastation, what happens to the species?

Prabhupada: Happens means these different ways become destroyed, but again, during creation, they come in.

[Guest guest]

I have read the last post but for me I still do not understand how there are so many fossils and remains of dinosaurs, but at the same time Prabhupada stressed that they are still existing.

 

Dont get me wrong I am not questioning Prabhupada in a challenging mood in order to defeat him or something. But Prabhupada encouraged us to question and reason for ourselves as religion and philosophy should go hand in hand. So we should accept something based on sastra but it must also be logical.

 

So with this in mind, I am not satisfied with the explanations I have heard. There are so many fossils remains of so many giant dinosuars and animals, that are no where to be seen. The evidence is there. What is the explanation? Species like the dodo for instance are definatley extinct, they existed and where hunted untill extinction.

 

I want to know how the dinosaurs fit into the vedic world view, because I am sure everything in reality does fit in and goes hand in hand with vedic knowledge. But I have not found any explanations for this.

[Nitaichandra 0]

Me myself am unsure which one of the statements to take as ultimate truth .

Below I will quote more parts of the site from which I have copied the first conversation .

It contains explanations about the mood of Prabhupada when he talks with some of his disciples , how to understand the message behind his statements ...( and some more conversations )

These clarifications are useful for me , although it seems that these "commentators" also loose themselves into some contradictions ...

 

 

 

<ul type="square"> Q: Did dinosaurs really exist? In which yuga did they live? Is the Earth same after a yuga ends and a new one starts? Is there a destruction?

 

A: Sure they did. Can you imagine a hoax of such a colossal dimension? Also the lore from all over the world knows about some kind of big animals like dragons.

 

As far as I know they are found on all continents. Which yuga is hard to say but in the Bhagavatam there is at least one possible allusion to them (8.10.10-12). There is probably more in other Puranas. During my study of North American Native lore I found a hint in Ojibwa tribe legends that their predecessors lived together with huge animals which were destroyed by a comet.

 

Destructions (pralaya) of various dimensions happen regularly, after every maha-yuga, manvantara, kalpa and dvi-parardha (Brahma's life span) and at some special occasions. See SB 8.24 (Matsya-lila). About how Earth changes after each particular pralaya there is not much said in sastra as far as I know.

 

Q: Srila Prabhupada doubted that dinosaurs ever existed, whereas much evidence is available to at least support the view that dinosaurs did once exist on this planet. He also stated that there was no such thing as 'extinction' of species. Please elucidate.

 

A: Below you'll find compilation of everything recorded what Srila Prabhupada said about the dinosaurs. I will now try to comment on it a little bit.

 

First, he didn't deny their existence. He mentioned that the existence of big forms of animals is recorded in the Vedas (super-eagles - Srimad Bhagavatam 5.23.3, timingila super-whales - SB 8.7.18, 8.10.10-12, 10.1.5-7). SB 8.10.10-12 mentions "big lizards" (whatever they are). The Vedas also mention that with the progression of time the life forms become smaller.

 

In general he didn't consider the matter of their existence or nonexistence very important. He repeatedly stressed that our sense perception is imperfect and that there are many life forms which we don't know about.

 

This is very true. Humans actually know quite a small portion of the land on this Earth, what to speak of the sea. Every year there are many "new" organisms discovered and some of them are quite big (reptiles, fish, birds, mammals). Just in this century there have been discovered many big animals like a species of jungle hog from Vietnam, a species of cat from Ryu-kyu archipelago, a big species of shark from the Hawaii islands, the onza (an animal from Mexico resembling the puma), the giant octopus from the ocean abysses around Bahamas, giant species of calmars etc.

 

Srila Prabhupada also said that no species of life becomes extinct.

 

It is important to remember that the Vedic definition of species is different from the modern one. The Vedas mention 8,400,000 species of life and all of them are repeatedly created after every partial or total cosmic devastation.

 

Regarding the survival of the "living fossils" there is an example of the Latimeria fish which exactly resembles the rock imprints of the fossil Devonian species etc.

 

To study the possibility of existence of such animals a group of scientists (mostly biologists) formed a new scientific discipline called a cryptozoology. They have their regular meetings, they organize expeditions to the remote corners of the world and they publish the Journal of Cryptozoology in which they discuss the existence of unknown (mainly big) life forms from all over the world whose existence is supported by ancient writings, local lore and both native and non-native witnesses (soldiers, tourists, scientists etc.) There are also websites dedicated to this field of study.

 

On their "wanted" list there are several species of hominids from all over the world (known locally as yetti, almas, sasquatch, big foot etc.), great dangerous cats of an above-lion size from the jungles of equatorial Africa (some of them with huge fangs), great species of reptiles or dinosaurs from the oceans and lakes (e.g. Loch Ness in Scotland, Lake Champlain in Canada, etc.) and the jungles (Africa, South America), flying dinosaurs resembling Pteranodon and other types (Zaire, Southwest USA), and many other.

 

Because this type of research, if successful, can seriously damage the accepted paradigms of Darwinian evolution of species, the establishment science views it with incredulity and suspicion. Therefore the cryptozoology is a "marginal" science.

 

Vaisnava scientists, on the other hand, use this type of evidence to show that the Vedic version is correct.

 

 

Room Conversation, Hyderabad, April 14, 1975

750414RC.HYD

 

Devotee: Srila Prabhupada, the other day we were talking about proving different assumptions through archeological findings.

Prabhupada: That is also bogus. Archeological findings is bogus.

Brahmananda: But it seems that big skeletons of all these big dinosaurs...

Prabhupada: That we have already information. We have got timingila. Just like big house. They can swallow up, what is called?

Devotee: Whale. Whale.

Prabhupada: Whale (indistinct).

Tamala Krsna: No but these dinosaurs move on the land. They're not fish. And they're very big and we have information...

Prabhupada: So what is to you? You are also a created being. He's also created being. That's the (indistinct). You are not creator of the (indistinct)

Tamala Krsna: But you say that there was more intelligent life previously, whereas we see these dinosaurs were previously.

Prabhupada: But you do not see, you simply imagine.

Tamala Krsna: No. We have the skeletons.

Devotee: We have the bones, the bones of animals.

Prabhupada: But that's all right. There was a big animal, that's all. Just like you are a foolish animal, so there was a big animal. What is the difference? They are animals.

Tamala Krsna: But we have skeletons showing the men at that time also and their brains were very tiny.

Prabhupada: That you say. But I don't believe it. I have not seen.

 

Morning Walk, Los Angeles, June 8, 1976

760608MW.LA

 

Ramesvara: Srila Prabhupada, I was once told by some devotees that you had said in some previous age of Kali, the dinosaurs, gigantic animals, were on the earth.

Prabhupada: I said?

Ramesvara: They say that you said. (laughs)

Prabhupada: (laughs) I never said. I never bother with these nonsense things.

Ramesvara: They have got so many bones in the museums showing these gigantic animals.

Prabhupada: Not gigantic. There are bones. But that animal is still there, whalefish.

Ramesvara: Whalefish.

Prabhupada: Oh, yes. Very big body.

Ramesvara: Some have become extinct.

Prabhupada: Why they should be extinct?

Hrdayananda: No longer on the earth.

Ramesvara: No longer on this planet.

Prabhupada: (too much noise) Not necessarily. They are within the ocean.

Hari-sauri: No, other animals.

Prabhupada: What other animals?

Ramesvara: Those gigantic, they called them...

Hrdayananda: Brontosaurus.

Ramesvara: Tyrannosaurus.

Gigantic animals, they say are meat-eaters.

Hrdayananda: Dinosaurus.

Hari-sauri: Tetrasaurus.

Prabhupada: Another imagination. These are actual facts.(?)

Hari-sauri: They just made up different compositions of bones and then drew some outlines on them.

Prabhupada: Yes. They are imagination.

Hari-sauri: But you said in Hawaii though that there are some animals that are as big as skyscrapers?

Prabhupada: Yes, these are birds. It is far from this earth though. They travel from one planet to another.

Ramesvara: So these bones that they have found of these gigantic animals, they were all living underneath the water.

Prabhupada: Yes.

Ramesvara: Not on the land.

Prabhupada: Maybe. But the list is there: jalaja nava-laksani. There are 900,000 different forms, and how many we have seen? There is information in the sastra. Pasavas trimsal-laksani. Three million different types of animals.

Hari-sauri: We've seen a few hundred at most.

Prabhupada: That's all. (laughs) That is also doubtful.

 

 

Morning Walk New York, July 12, 1976

760712MW.NY

 

Ramesvara: They are convinced that dinosaurs, these gigantic animals, were living on this planet millions of years ago. They found some bones, and they have created the form of the animal body.

Tamala Krsna: Is it true that there were big dinosaur bodies?

Prabhupada: If they were, it is still now.

Tamala Krsna: Oh, wow.

Prabhupada: We don't say it is extinct.

Tamala Krsna: But you've explained that even if not here then it must be on another planet.

Prabhupada: Yes, another. This planet, what you have seen?

Ramesvara: That's the point, what we have seen about this planet? Devotee (1): Could still be here. They found one in, where is that? In Ireland?

Prabhupada: Cannot be extinct, that is not possible.

Devotee (1): In that lake?

Tamala Krsna: But do you think they were on this planet?

Prabhupada: No, no, may be on this planet, but it doesn't matter that it is extinct. You have not seen.

Tamala Krsna: No, that's a fact.

Ramesvara: Their idea is that at that time man was living in the form of half monkey, half man in a cave, and gradually he evolved to become more civilized.

Prabhupada: That is still there. Kinnaras. Kinnaras means it is

doubtful whether he is man or monkey.

Tamala Krsna: Wow.

Prabhupada: There is a Kinnara-loka. Kimpurusa. Kinnara. They are still existing. It is not that they are finished.

Hari-sauri: I was reading a magazine when we were on the plane, and it was describing this type of monkey man, that they are being called, they existed in snow wastes.

Prabhupada: Or what is called? The big...?

Tamala Krsna: Orangutan, gorilla.

Prabhupada: Gorilla, they are like men.

Tamala Krsna: Yes, they are. Very much like men. We see them in the zoo.

Prabhupada: They have got their senses like men.

Hari-sauri: There's another species they call the Yetti. They say it exists in the Himalayan regions. But they've not been able to capture one because, uh... But there's been many citings and reportings of it.

 

 

--

 

Q. Thanks for the mail, it was really interesting. But still I found it very confusing, it seems to me that Srila Prabhupada was contradicting himself (first saying that it's not possible that some species might be extinct here and exist on other planets and then saying that it's possible) and he didn't really answer those questions, but pushed them away and started putting down Western scientists. So my desire to know about it is not yet satisfied.

 

A: This is a bit complex issue to deal with as there is really not much said in the sastras about the dinos. Sastras, our main reference, are not to be used as scientific encyclopedias. Their main point is the spiritual knowledge.

 

I don't think Srila Prabhupada really contradicted himself - he never said any species become extinct. He stressed that the exploration of the Earth is far from being complete so no one can say that some species 'extinct' in one place can't survive in another place (or a planet for that matter).

 

The nature of these conversation was pretty informal and depended a lot on the context (which disciples were present etc.). SP sometimes sounded harsh to reprimand his disciples to disentangle them from their conditioning. The point is that this is guru's business. The outsiders may consider it improper or dogmatic but they are in a different position as they didn't accepted the discipleship. With them therefore SP dealt in a different way.

 

Srila Prabhupada was not a scientist and thus didn't feel like getting into these matters too much ('pushing them away' if you wish). He many times said that he knows nothing about the western science but that he can challenge it on the most important point: the origin of life (from life, not from matter). If the 'life from matter' theory is disproved the whole structure built on it will crumble. SP didn't like the arrogance of the modern scientists which is completely against the Vedic approach where knowledge leads to humility and wanted to expose them as ignorant according to the Vedic standard ('putting them down'). On the other hand he appreciated those few of modern scientists who actually took this humble stance (like Einstein).

 

Ultimately he was not attacking science to becomes famous, to feel superior or for fun. He worried about the people who believe it unconditionally and are stuck in the materialistic way of life which aggravates their suffering. Thus he wanted them to be freed from their blind faith in science which leads them on the road to hell (as Chris Rhea sings).