Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

aryan invasion theory is fake! documentary video

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

Aryan Invasion theory fabrication - Indians predated Newton 'discovery' by 250 years

vedic physics - fabrication of aryan invasion theory

a devavision production DevaVision Documentary Videos - India Video

Scientific Verification of Vedic Knowledge: Archaeology Online


A very interesting documentary which deals with aryan invasion theory fabrication, and explaining vedic Indian discoveries covering mathematics and physics, what newton, pythagorus and many others discovered was already had been found by ancient Indians hundred of years ago but credit for that was not given due to racial discrimination.


download -

vedic physics - fabrication of aryan invasion theory.mp4 download - 2shared

Free File Hosting & Video Downloads, Free File Sharing, Online Friends Network - Ziddu



watch here http://videobam.com/xMbtJ

vedic physics - fabrication of aryan invasion theory on Vimeo




Indians predated Newton 'discovery' by 250 years

Dr George Gheverghese Joseph from The University of Manchester says

the 'Kerala School' identified the 'infinite series'- one of the basic

components of calculus - in about 1350.

The discovery is currently - and wrongly - attributed in books to

Sir Isaac Newton and Gottfried Leibnitz at the end of the seventeenth


The team from the Universities of Manchester and Exeter reveal the

Kerala School also discovered what amounted to the Pi series and used it

to calculate Pi correct to 9, 10 and later 17 decimal places.

And there is strong circumstantial evidence that the Indians passed

on their discoveries to mathematically knowledgeable Jesuit missionaries

who visited India during the fifteenth century.

That knowledge, they argue, may have eventually been passed on to Newton himself.



Dr Joseph made the revelations while trawling through obscure Indian

papers for a yet to be published third edition of his best selling book

'The Crest of the Peacock: the Non-European Roots of Mathematics' by

Princeton University Press.

He said: "The beginnings of modern maths is usually seen as a

European achievement but the discoveries in medieval India between the

fourteenth and sixteenth centuries have been ignored or forgotten.

"The brilliance of Newton's work at the end of the seventeenth

century stands undiminished - especially when it came to the algorithms

of calculus.

"But other names from the Kerala School, notably Madhava and

Nilakantha, should stand shoulder to shoulder with him as they

discovered the other great component of calculus- infinite series.

"There were many reasons why the contribution of the Kerala school

has not been acknowledged - a prime reason is neglect of scientific

ideas emanating from the Non-European world - a legacy of European

colonialism and beyond.

"But there is also little knowledge of the medieval form of the local

language of Kerala, Malayalam, in which some of most seminal texts,

such as the Yuktibhasa, from much of the documentation of this

remarkable mathematics is written."

He added: "For some unfathomable reasons, the standard of evidence

required to claim transmission of knowledge from East to West is greater

than the standard of evidence required to knowledge from West to East.

"Certainly it's hard to imagine that the West would abandon a

500-year-old tradition of importing knowledge and books from India and

the Islamic world.

"But we've found evidence which goes far beyond that: for example,

there was plenty of opportunity to collect the information as European

Jesuits were present in the area at that time.

"They were learned with a strong background in maths and were well versed in the local languages.



"And there was strong motivation: Pope Gregory XIII set up a committee to look into modernising the Julian calendar.



"On the committee was the German Jesuit astronomer/mathematician

Clavius who repeatedly requested information on how people constructed

calendars in other parts of the world. The Kerala School was undoubtedly

a leading light in this area.

"Similarly there was a rising need for better navigational methods

including keeping accurate time on voyages of exploration and large

prizes were offered to mathematicians who specialised in astronomy.

"Again, there were many such requests for information across the

world from leading Jesuit researchers in Europe. Kerala mathematicians

were hugely skilled in this area."

Source: University of Manchester


Indians predated Newton 'discovery' by 250 years




We owe a lot to the Indians, who taught us how to count, without which no worthwhile scientific discovery could have been made.

Albert Einstein.



is the cradle of the human race, the birthplace of human speech, the

mother of history, the grandmother of legend and the great grand mother

of tradition.

Mark Twain.



If there is one place on the face of earth where all dreams of living

men have found a home from the very earliest days when man began the

dream of existence, it is India .

French scholar Romain Rolland.Voltaire Francois Marie Arouet (1694-1774) France's greatest writer and philosopher wrote:


" I am convinced that everything has come down to us from the banks of the Ganges,

- astronomy, astrology, metempsychosis, etc. It is very important to

note that some 2,500 years ago at the least Pythagoras went from Samos

to the Ganges to learn geometry...But he would certainly not have

undertaken such a strange journey had the reputation of the Brahmins'

science not been long established in Europe..."


Friedrich von Schlegel (1772-1829) German philosopher, critic, and writer, declared in 1803:



without exception is of Indian origin..whether directly or

indirectly, all nations are originally nothing but Indian colonies."

(source: The Invasion That Never Was - By Michel Danino and Sujata Nahar p. 12 - 13 and 90 - 91).


Refer to Voltaire, Lettres sur l'origine des sciences et sur celle des

peuples de l'Asia (first published Paris, 1777), letter of 15 December

1775. and Voltaire, Fragments historiques sur l'linde, p. 444 - 445------------------


No trace of “demographic disruption” in the

North-West of the subcontinent between 4500 and 800 BCE; this negates

the possibility of any massive intrusion, by so-called Indo-Aryans or

other populations, during that period.

Deep late Pleistocene

genetic link between contemporary Europeans and Indians, provided by the

mtDNA haplogroup U, which encompasses roughly a fifth of mtDNA lineages

of both populations. Our estimate for this split [between Europeans and

Indians] is close to the suggested time for the peopling of Asia and

the first expansion of anatomically modern humans in Eurasia and likely

pre-dates their spread to Europe.”

Haplogroup U, being common to

North Indian and “Caucasoid” populations, was found in tribes of eastern

India such as the Lodhas and Santals, which would not be the case if it

had been introduced through Indo-Aryans. Such is also the case of the

haplogroup M, another marker frequently mentioned in the early

literature as evidence of an invasion: in reality, haplogroup M occurs

with a high frequency, averaging about 60%, across most Indian

population groups, irrespective of geographical location of habitat.

Tribal populations have higher frequencies of haplogroup M than caste



- U.S. anthropologists Kenneth Kennedy, John Lukacs and Brian Hemphill.



haplogroup “M” common to India (with a frequency of 60%), Central and

Eastern Asia (40% on average), and even to American Indians; however,

this frequency drops to 0.6% in Europe, which is “inconsistent with the

‘general Caucasoidness’ of Indians.” This shows, once again, that “the

Indian maternal gene pool has come largely through an autochthonous

history since the Late Pleistocene.” U haplogroup frequency 13% in

India, almost 14% in North-West Africa, and 24% from Europe to Anatolia.

“Indian and western Eurasian haplogroup U varieties differ profoundly;

the split has occurred about as early as the split between the Indian

and eastern Asian haplogroup M varieties. The data show that both M and U

exhibited an expansion phase some 50,000 years ago, which should have

happened after the corresponding splits.” In other words, there is a

genetic connection between India and Europe, but a far more ancient one

than was thought.

If one were to extend methodology used to suggest

an Aryan invasion based on Y-Dna statistics to populations of Eastern

and Southern India, one would be led to an exactly opposite result: “the

straightforward suggestion would be that both Neolithic (agriculture)

and Indo-European languages arose in India and from there, spread to



- Twenty authors headed by Kivisild - Archaeogenetics of Europe - 2000.



Toomas Kivisild led a study (2003) in which comparisons of the

diversity of R1a1 (R-M17) haplogroup in Indian, Pakistani, Iranian,

Central Asian, Czech and Estonian populations. The study showed that the

diversity of R1a1 in India, Pakistan, and Iran, is higher than in

Czechs (40%), and Estonians[12].

Kivisild came to the conclusion

that "southern and western Asia might be the source of this haplogroup":

"Haplogroup R1a, previously associated with the putative Indo-Aryan

invasion, was found at its highest frequency in Punjab but also at a

relatively high frequency (26%) in the Chenchu tribe. This finding,

together with the higher R1a-associated short tandem repeat diversity in

India and Iran compared with Europe and central Asia, suggests that

southern and western Asia might be the source of this haplogroup".[12]


“Given the geographic spread and STR diversities of sister clades R1

and R2, the latter of which is restricted to India, Pakistan, Iran, and

southern central Asia, it is possible that southern and western Asia

were the source for R1 and R1a differentiation. ”



- Kivilsid - 2003



sharing of some Y-chromosomal haplogroups between Indian and Central

Asian populations is most parsimoniously explained by a deep, common

ancestry between the two regions, with diffusion of some Indian-specific

lineages northward.”

“The Y-chromosomal data consistently suggest a

largely South Asian origin for Indian caste communities and therefore

argue against any major influx, from regions north and west of India, of

people associated either with the development of agriculture or the

spread of the Indo-Aryan language family.”

“Southern castes and

tribals are very similar to each other in their Y-chromosomal haplogroup

compositions.” As a result, “it was not possible to confirm any of the

purported differentiations between the caste and tribal pools,” a

conclusion that directly clashes with the Aryan invasion theory which

purports that male European Aryans chased tribal adivasis and

aboriginals down south.


“For me and for Toomas Kivisild, South

Asia is logically the ultimate origin of M17(Y-DNA Haplogroup R1a,

associated with the male Aryan invasion theory) and his ancestors; and

sure enough we find the highest rates and greatest diversity of the M17

line in Pakistan, India, and eastern Iran, and low rates in the

Caucasus. M17 is not only more diverse in South Asia than in Central

Asia, but diversity characterizes its presence in isolated tribal groups

in the south, thus undermining any theory of M17 as a marker of a ‘male

Aryan invasion’ of India. One average estimate for the origin of this

line in India is as much as 51,000 years. All this suggests that M17

could have found his way initially from India or Pakistan, through

Kashmir, then via Central Asia and Russia, before finally coming into



-Stephen Oppenheimer


F. Max Muller speaks of the colonization of Persia by the Hindus.

Discussing the word 'Arya', he says: "But it was more faithfully

preserved by the Zoroastrians, who migrated from India to the North-west

and whose religion has been preserved to us in the Zind Avesta, though

in fragments only. He again says: "The Zoroastrians were a colony from

Northern India."

(source: Science of Language - By Max Muller p. 242-253).



Arnold Hermann Ludwig Heeran says: "In point of fact that Zind is

derived from the Sanskrit, and a passage to have descended from the

Hindus of the second or warrior caste."

(source: Historical

researches into the politics, intercourse, and trade of the

Carthaginians, Ethiopians, and Egyptians - By A. H. Heeren Volume II p.



Sir William Jones writes: "I was not a little surprised

to find that out of words in Du Perron's Zind Dictionary, six or seven

were pure Sanskrit."

(source: Sir William Jones' Works Volume I p. 82-82).



Louis Jacolliot (1837-1890), who worked in French India as a government

official and was at one time President of the Court in Chandranagar,

translated numerous Vedic hymns, the Manusmriti, and the Tamil work,

Kural. This French savant and author of La Bible Dans L'Inde says:



"With such congruence before us, no one, I imagine, will appear to

contest the purely Hindu origin of Egypt, unless to suggest that: "And

who tells you that it was not Indian that copied Egypt? Any of you

require that this affirmation shall be refuted by proofs leaving no room

for even a shadow of doubt

"To be quite logical, then deprive

India of the Sanskrit, that language which formed all other; but show me

in India a leaf of papyrus, a columnar inscription, a temple bas relief

tending to prove Egyptian birth."


1.1 Peter Von Bohlen (1796 –

1840), a German Indologist, in his two volume monumental work Ancient

India with special reference to Egypt compared, at length, ancient Egypt

with India. He thought there was a cultural connection between the two

in ancient times. Egypt being at the receiving end.


Heinrich Karl Brugsch agrees with this view and writes in his History of Egypt that,



"We have a right to more than suspect that India, eight thousand years

ago, sent a colony of emigrants who carried their arts and high

civilization into what is now known as Egypt." The Egyptians came,

according to their records, from a mysterious land (now known to lie on

the shores of the Indian Ocean)."


Col. Henry Steel Olcott, a

former president of the Theosophical Society, who explained in a March,

1881 edition of The Theosophist (page 123) that:


"We have a

right to more than suspect that India, eight thousand years ago, sent a

colony of emigrants who carried their arts and high civilization into

what is now known to us as Egypt...This is what Bengsch Bey, the modern

as well as the most trusted Egyptologer and antiquarian says on the

origin of the old Egyptians. Regarding these as a branch of the

Caucasian family having a close affinity with the Indo-Germanic races,

he insists that they 'migrated from India before historic memory, and

crossed that bridge of nations, the Isthus of Suez, to find a new

fatherland on the banks of the Nile."


1.2 Many others have also

written on similar lines (e.g. El Mansouri, Sir William Jones, Paul

William Roberts, and Adolf Eramn).


Max Muller had also observed

that the mythology of Egyptians (and also that of the Greeks and

Assyrians) is wholly founded on Vedic traditions. Eusebius, a Greek

writer, has also recorded that the early Ethiopians emigrated from the

river Indus and first settled in the vicinity of Egypt.



Egyptians came, according to their own records, from a mysterious

land...on the shore of the Indian Ocean, the sacred Punt; the original

home of their gods...who followed thence after their people who had

abandoned them to the valley of the Nile, led by Amon, Hor and Hathor.

This region was the Egyptian 'Land of the Gods,' Pa-Nuter, in old

Egyptian, or Holyland, and now proved beyond any doubt to have been

quite a different place from the Holyland of Sinai. By the pictorial

hieroglyphic inscription found on the walls of the temple of the Queen

Haslitop at Der-el-babri, we see that this Punt can be no other than

India. For many ages the Egyptians traded with their old homes, and the

reference here made by them to the names of the Princes of Punt and its

fauna and flora, especially the nonmenclature of various precious woods

to be found but in India, leave us scarcely room for the smallest doubt

that the old civilization of Egypt is the direct outcome of that the

older India."

(source: Theosophist for March 1881 p. 123).



It is believed that the Dravidians from India went to Egypt and laid

the foundation of its civilization there. the Egyptians themselves had

the tradition that they originally came from the South, from a land

called Punt, historian of the West, Dr. H.R. Hall



Indus Valley civilization is, according to Sir John Marshall who was in

charge of the excavations, the oldest of all civilizations unearthed (c.

4000 B.C.) It is older than the Sumerian and it is believed by many

that the latter was a branch of the former.


Adolf Erman

(1854-1937) author of Life in ancient Egypt and A handbook of Egyptian

religion, says that the persons who were responsible for a highly

developed Egyptian civilization were from Punt, an Asiatic country, a

description of which is unveiled by this scholar from the old legends - a

distant country washed by the great seas, full of valleys, incense,

balsum, precious metals and stones; rich in animals, cheetahs, panthers,

dog-headed apes and long tailed monkeys, winged creatures with strange

feathers to fly up to the boughs of wonderful trees, especially the

incense tree and the coconut trees.


Dr. Erman further says that

analyzing the Egyptian legends makes it clear that from Punt the

heavenly beings headed by Amen, Horus and Hather, passed into the Nile

valley...To this same country belongs that idol of Bes, the ancient

figure of the deity in the Land of Punt.


Klaus K. Klostermaier, in his book A Survey of Hinduism p. 18 says:



"For several centuries a lively commerce developed between the ancient

Mediterranean world and India, particularly the ports on the Western

coast. The most famous of these ports was Sopara, not far from modern

Bombay, which was recently renamed Mumbai. Present day Cranganore in

Kerala, identified with the ancient Muziris, claims to have had trade

contacts with Ancient Egypt under Queen Hatsheput, who sent five ships

to obtain spices, as well as with ancient Israel during King Soloman's

reign. Apparently, the contact did not break off after Egypt was

conquered by Greece and later by Rome.


Arnold Hermann Ludwig

Heeren (1760-1842) an Egyptologist has observed: "It is perfectly

agreeable to Hindu manners that colonies from India, i.e., Banian

families should have passed over Africa, and carried with them their

industry, and perhaps also their religious worship.Whatever weight

may be attached to Indian tradition and the express testimony of

Eusebius confirming the report of migrations from the banks of the Indus

into Egypt, there is certainly nothing improbable in the event itself,

as a desire of gain would have formed a sufficient inducement."

(source: Historical Researches - Heeran p. 309).


Louis Jacolliot has written:


“Egypt received from India, by Manes or Manu, its social institutions

and laws, which resulted in division of the people into four castes, and

placing the priest in the first rank; in the second, kings; then

traders and artisans; and last in the social scale, the proletaire – the

menial almost a slave.”


Gustav Oppert (1836-1908) born in

Hamburg, Germany, he taught Sanskrit and comparative linguistics at the

Presidency College, Madras for 21 years. He was the Telugu translator to

the Government and Curator, Government Oriental Manuscript Library. He

wrote a book Die Gottheiten der Indier ("The Gods of the Indians") in



In his book Oppert discussed the chief gods of the Aryans and he compares Aditi with Egyptian Isis and the Babylonian Ea.


(source: German Indologists: Biographies of Scholars in Indian Studies

writing in German - By Valentine Stache-Rosen. p.81-82).


We are

not completely in the dark on the question of Indian influence on

Greece. Speaking of ascetic practices in the West, Professor Sir

Flinders Petrie (1853-1942) British archaeologist and Egyptologist,

author of Egypt and Israel (1911) observes:


"The presence of a

large body of Indian troops in the Persian army in Greece in 480 B.C.

shows how far west the Indian connections were carried; and the

discovery of modeled heads of Indians at Memphis, of about the fifth

century B.C. shows that Indians were living there for trade. Hence there

is no difficulty in regarding India as the source of the entirely new

ideal of asceticism in the West."


Friedrich Wilhelm, Freiherr von Bissing (1873-1956) wrote:



"The land of Punt in the Egyptian ethnological traditions has been

identified by the scholars with the Malabar coast of Deccan. From this

land ebony, and other rich woods, incense, balsam, precious metals, etc.

used to be imported into Egypt."

(source: Prehistoricsche Topfen aus Indien and Aegypten - By Friedrich Wilhelm, Freiherr von Bissing. Chapter VIII ).


Sir William Jones says:


"Of the cursory observations on the Hindus, which it would require

volumes to expand and illustrate, this is the result, that they had an

immemorial affinity with the old Persians, Ethiopians and Egyptians, the

Phoenicians, Greeks, and Tuscans, the Scythians, or Goths, and Celts,

the Chinese, Japanese, and Peruvians."

(source: Asiatic Researches - volume I p. 426).



Danino (b. June 4, 1956 at Honfleur), is a French‐born Indian author

who has been living in Tamil Nadu, India since 1977.[1]



participated in the translation and publication of the works of Sri

Aurobindo and of The Mother. Danino also edited India's Rebirth (a

selection from Sri Aurobindo's works about India, first published in

1993, translated into nine Indian languages) and India the Mother. He

engaged himself also for the preservation of tropical rainforest in the

Nilgiri Hills. In 2001, he convened the International Forum for India's

Heritage (IFIH), having over 160 eminent founder members, with the

mission of promoting the essential values of India's heritage in every

field of life.


In The Invasion that Never Was (2000), he has

criticized the "Aryan invasion theory" and its proponents, instead

opting for the notion of "Indigenous Aryans". Danino asserts that Aryans

are indigenous to India.



* India invented the Number System. Zero was invented by Aryabhatta.



* The World's first university was established in Takshashila in 700BC.

More than 10,500 students from all over the world studied more than 60

subjects. The University of Nalanda built in the 4th century BC was one

of the greatest achievements of ancient India in the field of education.



* Sanskrit is the mother of all the European languages.

Sanskrit is the most suitable language for computer software - a report

in Forbes magazine, July 1987.


* The art of Navigation was

bornin the river Sindhu 6000 years ago. The very word Navigation is

derived from the Sanskrit word NAVGATIH. The word navy is also derived

from Sanskrit 'Nou'.


* Bhaskaracharya calculated the time taken

by the earth to orbit the sun hundreds of years before the astronomer

Smart. Time taken by earth to orbit the sun: (5th century) 365.258756484



* The value of pi was first calculated by Budhayana, and

he explained the concept of what is known as the Pythagorean Theorem.

He discovered this in the 6th century long before the European



* Algebra, trigonometry and calculus came from

India. Quadratic equations were by Sridharacharya in the 11th century.

The largest numbers the Greeks and the Romans used were 106 whereas

Hindus used numbers as big as 10**53(10 to the power of 53) with

specific names as early as 5000 BCE during the Vedic period. Even today,

the largest used number is Tera 10**12(10 to the power of 12).



* IEEE has proved what has been a century old suspicion in the world

scientific community that the pioneer of wireless communication was

Prof. Jagdish Bose and not Marconi.


* The earliest reservoir and dam for irrigation was built in Saurashtra.


According to Saka King Rudradaman I of 150 CE a beautiful lake called

Sudarshana was constructed on the hills of Raivataka during Chandragupta

Maurya's time.


* Sushruta is the father of surgery. 2600 years

ago he and health scientists of his time conducted complicated

surgeries like cesareans, cataract, artificial limbs, fractures, urinary

stones and even plastic surgery and brain surgery. Usage of anesthesia

was well known in ancient India. Over 125 surgical equipment were used.

Deep knowledge of anatomy, physiology, etiology, embryology, digestion,

metabolism, genetics and immunity is also found in many texts.


* The place value system, the decimal system was developed in India in 100 BC.



1. India invented the Number system. Pingalacharya invented ‘zero.’ in 200 BC.



2. Indians discovered the size, shape, rotation and gravity of earth

about 1000 years before Kelvin,Galileo,Newton and Copper Nicus.

Aryabhatta I was the first to explain spherical shape,size

,diameter,rotaion and correct speed of Earth in 499 AD.



Newton’s law of Gravitational force is an ancient Indian discovery. In

Siddhanta Siromani ( Bhuvanakosam 6 ) Bhaskaracharya II described about

gravity of earth about 400 years before Sir Isaac Newton.


4. Bhaskaracharya II discovered Differential calculus.


5. Theory of Continued Fraction was discovered by Bhaskaracharya II.


6. The place value system, the decimal system was developed in India in 100 BC.


7. Indians discovered Arithmetic and Geometric progression. Arithmetic progression is explained in Yajurveda.


8. Govindaswamin discovered Newton Gauss Interpolation formula about 1800 years before Newton.


9. Vateswaracharya discovered Newton Gauss Backward Interpolation formula about 1000 years before Newton.


10. Madhavacharya discovered Taylor series of Sine and Cosine function about 250 years before Taylor.


11. Madhavacharya discovered Newton Power series.


12. Madhavacharya discovered Gregory Leibnitz series for the Inverse Tangent about 280 years before Gregory.


13. Madhavacharya discovered Leibnitz power series for pi about 300 years before Leibnitz.


14. Parameswaracharya discovered Lhuiler’s formula about 400 years before Lhuiler.


15. Nilakanta discovered Newton’s Infinite Geometric Progression convergent series.



16. Theorems relating the diameter,volume and circumference of circles

discovered by Madhavacharya, Puthumana Somayaji, Aryabhatta,



17. The value of pi was first calculated by Aryabhatta I in 499 AD,ie more than 1350 years before Lindemann


18. Boudhayana discovered Pythagorus Theorem in 800BC. ie 300 years before Pythagorus.


19. Algebra, trigonometry and calculus came from India. Quadratic equations were by Sridharacharya in the 11th Century.



20. While the Greeks were using only upto a maximum value 1000, Indians

could go upto 18th power of 10 level during Vedic period.


21. Infinity was well known for ancient Indians. BhaskaracharyaII in Beejaganitha

(stanza-20) has given clear explanation with examples for infinity



22. Positive and Negative numbers and their calculations were explained

first by Brahmagupta in his book Brahmasputa Siddhanta.


23. Sterling formula was discovered by Brahmagupta about 1000 years before Sterling.


24. Demovier’s theorem of positive integral was discovered by Brahmagupta in 628 A.D, i.e around 1000 years before Demovier.


25. Puthumana Somayaji discovered Demovier’s infinite series in 1140 AD,i.e more than 200 years before Demovier.



26. Maharshi Sushruta is the father of surgery. 2600 years ago he and

health scientists of his time conducted surgeries like cesareans,

cataract, fractures and urinary stones. Usage of anesthesia was well

known in ancient India. He was the first person to perform plastic



27. When many cultures in the world were only nomadic

forest dwellers over 5000 years ago, Indians established Harappan

culture in Sindhu Valley (Indus Valley Civilization).


28. The

world’s first University was established in Takshila in 700BC. More than

10,500 students from all over the world studied more than 60 subjects.

The University of Nalanda built in the 4th century BC was one of the

greatest achievements of ancient India in the field of education.


29. According to the Forbes magazine, Sanskrit is the most suitable language for computer software.


30. Ayurveda is the earliest school of medicine known to humans.



31. Although western media portray modern images of India as poverty

stricken and underdeveloped through political corruption, India was once

the richest empire on earth.


32. According to the Gemmological Institute of America, until 1896, India was the only source of diamonds to the world.



33. USA based IEEE has proved what has been a century-old suspicion

amongst academics that the pioneer of wireless communication was

Professor Jagdeesh Bose and not Marconi.


34. The earliest reservoir and dam for irrigation was built in Saurashtra.


35. Chess was invented in India.



36. The first philosopher who formulated ideas about the atom in a

systematic manner was Kanada who lived in the 6th century B.C.


37. All the atomic reactors in the world are in Shiva Linga Shape which is an Indian contribution.


38. Padanjali maharshi discovered Sound waves.


39. Yoga is an ancient Indian gift to the world.


40. Shayanacharya discovered velocity of light.


41. Maharshi Bharadwaja discovered different types of light rays.



42. Maharshi Bharadwaja was the first person to give definition about

aeroplane. He explained about different types aeroplanes in his book

“Vimana Thantra” about 2000 years before Right Brothers.


43. Maharshi Bharadwaja discovered spectrometer. In his “Yantra Sarvaswa” he explained about more than 100 instruments.


44. The different colours of light, VIBGYOR are mentioned in Rigveda which was written more than 6000 years ago.


45. Maharshi Charaka discovered Psychology and Quantum healing system.


46. Varahamihira discovered the concept of “Budding of plants”.


47. Varahamihira discovered Comets in 505 AD, i.e more than 1100 years before Haley.


48. Gouthama Maharshi discovered the wave nature of sound about 1400 years before Hyghen.


49. Seven continents are mentioned in Padmapurana.



Early indologists wished to control &

convert the followers of Vedic Culture, therefore they widely propagated

that the Vedas were simply mythology.


Max Muller, perhaps the

most well known early sanskritist and indologist, although later in life

he glorified the Vedas, initially wrote that the "Vedas were worse than

savage" and "India must be conquered again by education... it's

religion is doomed"


Thomas Macaulay, who introduced English

education into India wanted to make the residents into a race that was:

"Indian in blood and color, but English in taste, in opinion, in morals,

and in intellect."


However, the German Philosopher Arthur

Schopenhauer stated that the Sanskrit understanding of these Indologists

was like that of young schoolboys.


These early Indologists:


• Devised the Aryan Invasion theory, denying India's Vedic past


• They taught that the English educational system is superior


• They intentionally misinterpreted sanskrit texts to make the Vedas look primitive.


• And they systematically tried to make Indians ashamed of their own culture


• Thus the actions of these indologists seems to indicate that they were motivated by a racial bias.


Facts -



• There is no evidence of an Aryan homeland outside of India mentioned

anywhere in the Vedas. On the contrary, the Vedas speak of the mighty

Sarasvati River and other places indigenous to India. To date, no

evidence for a foreign intrusion has been found, neither archaeological,

linguistic, cultural nor genetic.


• There are more than 2,500

Archaeological sites, two-thirds of which are along the recently

discovered dried up Sarasvati River bed. These sites show a cultural

continuity with the Vedic literature from the early Harrapan

civilization up to the present day India.


• Several independent studies of the drying up of the Sarasvati River bed, all indicate the same time period of 1,900 B.C.E.



• The significance of establishing this date for the drying up of the

Sarasvati River is, that it pushes the date for the composition of the

Rig Veda back to approximately 3,000 B.C.E., as enunciated by the Vedic

tradition itself.


• The late dating of the Vedic literatures by

indologists is based on speculated dates of 1,500 B.C.E. for the Aryan

Invasion and 1,200 B.C.E. for the Rig Veda, both now disproved by

scientific evidence.


Scientific Verification of Vedic Knowledge: Archaeology Online

The Myth of the Aryan Invavsion of India

Stephen Knapp and his books on Spiritual Enlightenment and Vedic Culture


University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, Center for Indic Studies


July 3, 2006


Press Release


Scientists Collide with Linguists to Assert Indigenous origin of Indian Civilization



Comprehensive population genetics data along with archeological and

astronomical evidence presented at June 23-25, 2006 conference in

Dartmouth, MA, overwhelmingly concluded that Indian civilization and its

human population is indigenous.


In fact, the original people

and culture within the Indian Subcontinent may even be a likely pool for

the genetic, linguistic, and cultural origin of the most rest of the

world, particularly Europe and Asia.


Leading evidences come

from population genetics, which were presented by two leading

researchers in the field, Dr. V. K. Kashyap, National Institute of

Biologicals, India, and Dr. Peter Underhill of Stanford University in

California. Their results generally contradict the notion Aryan

invasion/migration theory for the origin of Indian civilization.



Underhill concluded "the spatial frequency distributions of both L1

frequency and variance levels show a spreading pattern emanating from

India", referring to a Y chromosome marker. He, however, put several

caveats before interpreting genetic data, including "Y-ancestry may not

always reflect the ancestry of the rest of the genome"



Kashyap, on the other hand, with the most comprehensive set of genetic

data was quite emphatic in his assertion that there is "no clear genetic

evidence for an intrusion of Indo-Aryan people into India, [and]

establishment of caste system and gene flow."


Michael Witzel, a

Harvard linguist, who is known to lead the idea of Aryan

Invasion/migration/influx theory in more recent times, continued to

question genetic evidence on the basis that it does not provide the time

resolution to explain events that may have been involved in Aryan

presence in India.


Dr. Kashyap's reply was that even though the

time resolution needs further work, the fact that there are clear and

distinct differences in the gene pools of Indian population and those of

Central Asian and European groups, the evidence nevertheless negates

any Aryan invasion or migration into Indian Subcontinent.



Witzel though refused to present his own data and evidence for his

theories despite being invited to do so was nevertheless present in the

conference and raised many questions. Some of his commentaries

questioning the credibility of scholars evoked sharp responses from

other participants.


Rig Veda has been dated to 1,500 BC by

those who use linguistics to claim its origin Aryans coming out of

Central Asia and Europe. Archaeologist B.B. Lal and scientist and

historian N.S. Rajaram disagreed with the position of linguists, in

particular Witzel who claimed literary and linguistic evidence for the

non-Indian origin of the Vedic civilization.


Dr. Narahari

Achar, a physicist from University of Memphis clearly showed with

astronomical analysis that the Mahabharata war in 3,067 BC, thus poking a

major hole in the outside Aryan origin of Vedic people.



Interestingly, Witzel stated, for the first time to many in the

audience, that he and his colleagues no longer to Aryan

invasion theory.


Dr. Bal Ram Singh, Director, Center for Indic

Studies at UMass Dartmouth, which organized the conference was appalled

at the level of visceral feelings Witzel holds against some of the

scholars in the field, but felt satisfied with the overall outcome of

the conference.


"I am glad to see people who have been

scholarly shooting at each other for about a decade are finally in one

room, this is a progress", said Singh.


The conference was able

to bring together in one room for the first time experts from genetics,

archeology, physics, linguistics, anthropology, history, and philosophy.

A proceedings of the conference is expected to come out soon, detailing

various arguments on the origin of Indian civilization.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Create New...