ubuntu 0 Report post Posted April 16, 2011 I have been getting mixed opinions on using lab created vs. original. Some astrologers are strong advocates of lab created (they are just like originals and it's impossible to distinguish original from lab created) as they are very cheap and have no impurities. While others consider them useless. What are the thoughts of people on this forum? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
alokajagawat 1 Report post Posted May 1, 2011 It is extremely funny that you call such people astrologers. Astrology classics like Brahat Sahinta warn you about the problems with synthetic stones. They are useless junk that are chemically different from their original counterparts. Please analyze yourself that how could be a fake as effective as its original. It is a definitve no. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
