Guest guest Posted August 11, 2007 Report Share Posted August 11, 2007 This message was posted on another group I belong to and I was wondering what anyone's thoughts are on this? Sarita " Reiki vs. Kundalini same in My Humble Opinion " Reiki means universal energy. In sanskrit, the word is 'Prana'. In individuals, when the 'Prana' is sitting coiled in the root chakra, it is referred to as 'Kundalini'. When all chakras are open and the 'sushumna' that carries the 'prana'/'kundalini'/'reiki' through the chakras (starting at root chakra and exiting from the sahasrara) is opened as well, the 'prana'/'reiki' rises sufficiently to give healing powers. when we talk about reiki or kundalini, we are talking about the same universal energy. Yes, we all have it, but to make the kundalini rise (reiki attunement), effort or blessing is required. Sages with high spiritual growth have been known to raise the kundalini of aspirants just by 'will' or 'touch'. One who has the kundalini risen, can transfer the vibrations to others by 'will'. However, worldly affairs and associated emotions/thoughts can close the chakrs, making the 'kundalini' dormant again. in short, there is no conflict...reiki is same as kundalini or prana. love and peace Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 11, 2007 Report Share Posted August 11, 2007 The way I understand chrism is that a K activation can go back dormant, but once it becomes a full awakening, there's no going back. I have not read much about reiki, so I should not be replying. Hehe! Linda , " Sarita " <sarita1969 wrote: > > This message was posted on another group I belong to and I was > wondering what anyone's thoughts are on this? > > Sarita > > > " Reiki vs. Kundalini same in My Humble Opinion " > > Reiki means universal energy. In sanskrit, the word is 'Prana'. In > individuals, when the 'Prana' is sitting coiled in the root chakra, > it is referred to as 'Kundalini'. When all chakras are open and > the 'sushumna' that carries the 'prana'/'kundalini'/'reiki' through > the chakras (starting at root chakra and exiting from the sahasrara) > is opened as well, the 'prana'/'reiki' rises sufficiently to give > healing powers. > > when we talk about reiki or kundalini, we are talking about the same > universal energy. > > Yes, we all have it, but to make the kundalini rise (reiki > attunement), effort or blessing is required. > > Sages with high spiritual growth have been known to raise the > kundalini of aspirants just by 'will' or 'touch'. One who has the > kundalini risen, can transfer the vibrations to others by 'will'. > > However, worldly affairs and associated emotions/thoughts can close > the chakrs, making the 'kundalini' dormant again. > > in short, there is no conflict...reiki is same as kundalini or prana. > > love and peace > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 11, 2007 Report Share Posted August 11, 2007 I meant to tell you, Sarita, about this webpage I happened upon a week or so ago that tell about how prana operates in our bodies. I believe this article states that the prana (the rose color prana) which is the general prana is the prana send out through reiki. I don't remeber if that is the same as is the K prana. I know it said someting about that, but I don't remember exactly how it was stated. Kind of a long compicated article, but interesting. http://logos_endless_summer.tripod.com/id100.html It's worth reading. Linda , " Linda " <crazycats711 wrote: > > The way I understand chrism is that a K activation can go back > dormant, but once it becomes a full awakening, there's no going back. > I have not read much about reiki, so I should not be replying. > Hehe! > > Linda > > , " Sarita " > <sarita1969@> wrote: > > > > This message was posted on another group I belong to and I was > > wondering what anyone's thoughts are on this? > > > > Sarita > > > > > > " Reiki vs. Kundalini same in My Humble Opinion " > > > > Reiki means universal energy. In sanskrit, the word is 'Prana'. In > > individuals, when the 'Prana' is sitting coiled in the root chakra, > > it is referred to as 'Kundalini'. When all chakras are open and > > the 'sushumna' that carries the 'prana'/'kundalini'/'reiki' through > > the chakras (starting at root chakra and exiting from the > sahasrara) > > is opened as well, the 'prana'/'reiki' rises sufficiently to give > > healing powers. > > > > when we talk about reiki or kundalini, we are talking about the > same > > universal energy. > > > > Yes, we all have it, but to make the kundalini rise (reiki > > attunement), effort or blessing is required. > > > > Sages with high spiritual growth have been known to raise the > > kundalini of aspirants just by 'will' or 'touch'. One who has the > > kundalini risen, can transfer the vibrations to others by 'will'. > > > > However, worldly affairs and associated emotions/thoughts can close > > the chakrs, making the 'kundalini' dormant again. > > > > in short, there is no conflict...reiki is same as kundalini or > prana. > > > > love and peace > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 11, 2007 Report Share Posted August 11, 2007 Hello Sarita I hope you do not feel I am in any way casting an aspersion towards you or your friends - I am not. This is simply my opinion about Reiki Kundalini and other forms of Reiki. There are typically no easy ways to the Kundalini. Reiki isn't the same no matter how much inaccurate information is mixed with accurate information, presented and processed, turned and reshaped to fit a desired similarity. There are many areas of inaccuracy here with what this author wrote Sarita, but as it isn't going to change the writer's ideas or outlook I find it more of a demonstration of competition between practices. Serves a limited purpose. Suffice to say that when you " purchase " an " attunement " (even this word is a form of blurred vision imho) you do not " of a sudden " become enlightened or Kundalini active, in most cases, or given anything other than a " lighter " version of your pocket book. Don't get me wrong Reiki in and of itself can be good if the practitioner has that quality. A nice (expensive) visit to a nice person though nothing more. Reiki in practice and current form has become subverted by the commercial interests of greed and ego and it is these greedy and egotistic aspects of those practitioners who wish to place themselves above or in a " higher plane of existence " or " Soul Maturation " than those around them. It's an ego thing that can make money. Not saying " ALL " are this way just most.IMHO. Most of these commercial interests will allow you to twist in the Wind that you may order some more of their " therapies " as you suffer from what isn't Kundalini but other common forms of energetic illnesses: The need for loving attention or even a weak facsimile of it The need to feel differently about ones self - special The permission to be well despite the medical community Another approach to health or spiritual experience An entity incursion into your energetic and physical body. There are too many more to list. These are not " bad " reasons though the entity issue can be a challenge. They are just not related to Kundalini in as much as they are related to dysfunctional issues of our society. And from that vantage point Rieki, as practiced today, does serve a purpose. But not towards the activation - in most cases - of the Kundalini. If a person is already leaning towards this Kundalini experience then the Rieki may be the proverbial straw. Most Kundalini Rieki practitioners do not in actuality have the Kundalini. They have an ego oriented, self sustaining wish fulfillment or an embedded entity among other scenarios imho. As they do not understand or know what the Kundalini feels like or it's dynamic upon the body and they are only symptom oriented, they go with what they feel right or wrong, good if it feels good, bad if it feels bad, imagined or otherwise, often blinded by ignorance of an entity coursing through the body. Not all but many do have this issue and because of the problems that can ensue I do not support or embrace or in any way encourage people to purchase or receive " attunements " designed to awaken the Kundalini. Dr. Usui, the founder of Rieki, EARNED his activation basically by doing what amounts to the " safeties " as described on this site. He helped and served his fellow human beings. Most often for FREE. He meditated for weeks in a cave on the side of a mountain and was willing to stay there until he died if he didn't receive the gift he was searching for. This was what we call Kundalini, what he called Rieki. He used this force with honor and love in service to others diligently. Not for self aggrandizement or commercial interests. The qualities of transfer of this energy are negated by the individual's lack of selfless service and other aspects of nascent cultivation. I am not labeling all Rieki practitioners in a negative light " some " , a very precious few, are very positive love based people who get it. Some have awakened the Kundalini. Most, the great majority, have not. Buyer beware. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 11, 2007 Report Share Posted August 11, 2007 You are right on target Linda - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 11, 2007 Report Share Posted August 11, 2007 Sarita, wouldn't that be saying all the world religions are the same too? I think I remember reading somewhere that there are 7 major world religions, they say six but then they don't mention satanic. Yes, it's all EMF `electro magnetic field' or the light spectrum, all the way from ultra low frequencies to gamma rays. To say their different is like saying European electricity is different from US electricity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 11, 2007 Report Share Posted August 11, 2007 On reflection Sarita let me respond more directly to the post. Please see below bracketed by @@ , " Sarita " <sarita1969 wrote: > > This message was posted on another group I belong to and I was > wondering what anyone's thoughts are on this? > > Sarita > > > " Reiki vs. Kundalini same in My Humble Opinion " > > Reiki means universal energy. @@ Sanskrit isnt very well understood and there are many interpretations of what Prana is. Here is another one: Prana is a subtle material energy arising from rajo guna. It works as an interface between gross and subtle body, enabling all the psychophysical functions (i.e. animation - from Latin " anima " ). This sometimes leads to confusion of prana with jiva. Although they are very closely connected, prana is witnessed by the jiva which is floating in prana in the heart cavity. Katha Upanisad 1.3.1 says: rtam pibantau sukrtasya loke guham pravistau parame parardhe chayatapau brahmavido vadanti pancagnayo ye ca tri-naciketah " O Naciketa, the expansions of Lord Visnu as the tiny living being (jiva) and the Supersoul both stay within the cave of the heart of this body. In that cavity the living being, resting on the main prana, enjoys the results of activities, and the Supersoul, acting as witness enables him to enjoy them. Those who are well-versed in knowledge of Brahman and those householders who carefully follow the Vedic regulations say that the difference between the two is like the difference between a shadow and the sun. " Prana's movement leads to jiva's identification with the gross body (SB 4.29.71). Mundaka Upanishad (3.1.9): In sanskrit, the word is 'Prana'. In > individuals, when the 'Prana' is sitting coiled in the root chakra, > it is referred to as 'Kundalini'. @@ This would be Shakti not Prana if we are following the Vedics @@ When all chakras are open and > the 'sushumna' that carries the 'prana'/'kundalini'/'reiki' through > the chakras (starting at root chakra and exiting from the sahasrara) > is opened as well, the 'prana'/'reiki' rises sufficiently to give > healing powers. @@ Shakti rises and mixes with prana completing the " divine circuit " . Openning of chakras is a symptom of an activation not the cause @@ > > when we talk about reiki or kundalini, we are talking about the same > universal energy. @@ Wishfull thinking. A Conjecture based in ignorance. This is not unusual. It is a common theme that has gone on for thousands of years. @@ > > Yes, we all have it, but to make the kundalini rise (reiki > attunement), effort or blessing is required. @@ lol @@ > > Sages with high spiritual growth have been known to raise the > kundalini of aspirants just by 'will' or 'touch'. One who has the > kundalini risen, can transfer the vibrations to others by 'will'. > > However, worldly affairs and associated emotions/thoughts can close > the chakrs, making the 'kundalini' dormant again. > > in short, there is no conflict...reiki is same as kundalini or prana. @@ No they are different if we are following the Vedic model which is what they based their original premise on. Reiki practitioners are continuously striving for a validation of Reiki itself. Calling it Kundalini or calling it clam chowder doesnt make it so. Just underscores a feeling of insecurity that many Reiki folks seem to have about this practice called Reiki. Some Reiki people do activate though, so there is room for the comparisons.@@ > > love and peace > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 11, 2007 Report Share Posted August 11, 2007 Thanks Linda! I will take a look at it. Sarita , " Linda " <crazycats711 wrote: > > I meant to tell you, Sarita, about this webpage I happened upon a > week or so ago that tell about how prana operates in our bodies. I > believe this article states that the prana (the rose color prana) > which is the general prana is the prana send out through reiki. I > don't remeber if that is the same as is the K prana. I know it said > someting about that, but I don't remember exactly how it was stated. > Kind of a long compicated article, but interesting. > > http://logos_endless_summer.tripod.com/id100.html > > It's worth reading. > Linda > > , " Linda " > <crazycats711@> wrote: > > > > The way I understand chrism is that a K activation can go back > > dormant, but once it becomes a full awakening, there's no going > back. > > I have not read much about reiki, so I should not be replying. > > Hehe! > > > > Linda > > > > , " Sarita " > > <sarita1969@> wrote: > > > > > > This message was posted on another group I belong to and I was > > > wondering what anyone's thoughts are on this? > > > > > > Sarita > > > > > > > > > " Reiki vs. Kundalini same in My Humble Opinion " > > > > > > Reiki means universal energy. In sanskrit, the word is 'Prana'. > In > > > individuals, when the 'Prana' is sitting coiled in the root > chakra, > > > it is referred to as 'Kundalini'. When all chakras are open and > > > the 'sushumna' that carries the 'prana'/'kundalini'/'reiki' > through > > > the chakras (starting at root chakra and exiting from the > > sahasrara) > > > is opened as well, the 'prana'/'reiki' rises sufficiently to give > > > healing powers. > > > > > > when we talk about reiki or kundalini, we are talking about the > > same > > > universal energy. > > > > > > Yes, we all have it, but to make the kundalini rise (reiki > > > attunement), effort or blessing is required. > > > > > > Sages with high spiritual growth have been known to raise the > > > kundalini of aspirants just by 'will' or 'touch'. One who has the > > > kundalini risen, can transfer the vibrations to others by 'will'. > > > > > > However, worldly affairs and associated emotions/thoughts can > close > > > the chakrs, making the 'kundalini' dormant again. > > > > > > in short, there is no conflict...reiki is same as kundalini or > > prana. > > > > > > love and peace > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 11, 2007 Report Share Posted August 11, 2007 The author is not a friend just someone on a NDE group. She stated this as if she knew what she was talking about and it didn't ring true to me. Since I am so new on this path, I wanted to ask the seasoned people for opinions to see if I was correct. I got the distinct feeling that she has never experienced Kundalini and if she did would not have posted that message, lol. Thank you for the information. Sarita , " chrism " <> wrote: > > Hello Sarita I hope you do not feel I am in any way casting an > aspersion towards you or your friends - I am not. This is simply my > opinion about Reiki Kundalini and other forms of Reiki. > > There are typically no easy ways to the Kundalini. Reiki isn't the > same no matter how much inaccurate information is mixed with > accurate information, presented and processed, turned and reshaped > to fit a desired similarity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 11, 2007 Report Share Posted August 11, 2007 Thank you for the detailed info Chrism! I laughed too when I read the part about kundalini rising (reiki attunement). I was already disturbed by the post but that sent me over the edge, lol. I only wish that I could go back and tell some of this info but I fear I will ruffle feathers. Perhaps I will simply give the link to the K website and others can read it for themselves. Sarita , " chrism " <> wrote: > > On reflection Sarita let me respond more directly to the post. > Please see below bracketed by @@ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 12, 2007 Report Share Posted August 12, 2007 I always felt uncomfortable with paying for reiki and charging for it. In fact I had my master attunement done by a friend and payed only a donation. Where I was staying in Thailand (a small village) there was a group of middle aged women living there making a good living off reiki... I called them the reiki police, if anyone came in to town doing free reiki they would start slandering them or talking about them behind their backs. The women were alcoholics, emotional wrecks etc. I saw the ugly side of reiki here and it really turned me off. These women were charging very high prices and had huge ego's also seemed to have many problems themselves, how could they heal another? Yep, it was a sad sight indeed. Nearly all the healings I have given whilst travelling the world I gave for free, including attunements and people always commented on how profound they were. I instinctively felt that money passing hands was not for me, it made me feel really uncomfortble. I felt that doing it as a gift/service made the energy more pure or powerful. I did have a free attunement from a man I met before coming to chrisms site, he had been in japan studying what he called the true reiki (he said the west has a watered down, weak version) it involved dragons breathe and kundalini and service, he did not charge for his work ever. My heart chakra was blown open the day after, like a glowing sun, I had never felt such a powerful attunement. The man kept telling me, " It wasn't me it was you Elektra, not the attunement but your willingness to love " . Thats why I was drawn to Chrism, I knew he was the real deal as he was not charging for his time or disempowering me. The work is it's payment, to serve is to be enriched, God will support your material needs in other ways. Just my personal feelings and experiences. No offence to any working healers in anyway Love Elektra x x x _________ Answers - Got a question? Someone out there knows the answer. Try it now. http://uk.answers./ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 12, 2007 Report Share Posted August 12, 2007 I read and pondered this thread on Kundalini and Reiki last night...and slept on it as well. This morning during meditation I was shown that there is also a parallel within the experience of (don't know the exact terms) when receiving the Light from the top down, and also within some Christian Churches and Denominations. I saw that many things are built up around the Reality, even when it is not actively present and lived. That explains a lot of things to me. The Scripture verse that came to my mind was, " With their lips they praise Me, but their hearts are far from Me. " When Kundalini and Spirit are not truly active in a life, and that life parades along as if it is, then many can be deceived and robbed. I left many situations where all the right trappings were there, but no true substance. I am grateful for this further understanding about it. Many times I wondered why I couldn't fit in. Now I see it clearly. I was told many times " not to rock the boat. " My heart response was always, " I won't rock it, I'll sink the ------ thing. " Thank you for this thread everyone. Love, dhyana , " chrism " <> wrote: > > Hello Sarita I hope you do not feel I am in any way casting an > aspersion towards you or your friends - I am not. This is simply my > opinion about Reiki Kundalini and other forms of Reiki. > > There are typically no easy ways to the Kundalini. Reiki isn't the > same no matter how much inaccurate information is mixed with > accurate information, presented and processed, turned and reshaped > to fit a desired similarity. > > There are many areas of inaccuracy here with what this author wrote > Sarita, but as it isn't going to change the writer's ideas or > outlook I find it more of a demonstration of competition between > practices. Serves a limited purpose. > > Suffice to say that when you " purchase " an " attunement " (even this > word is a form of blurred vision imho) you do not " of a sudden " > become enlightened or Kundalini active, in most cases, or given > anything other than a " lighter " version of your pocket book. > > Don't get me wrong Reiki in and of itself can be good if the > practitioner > has that quality. A nice (expensive) visit to a nice person though > nothing more. > > Reiki in practice and current form has become subverted by the > commercial interests of greed and ego and it is these greedy and > egotistic aspects of those practitioners who wish to place > themselves above or in a " higher plane of existence " or " Soul > Maturation " than those around them. It's an ego thing that can make > money. Not saying " ALL " are this way just most.IMHO. > > Most of these commercial interests will allow you to twist in the > Wind that you may order some more of their " therapies " as you suffer > from what isn't Kundalini but other common forms of energetic > illnesses: > The need for loving attention or even a weak facsimile of it > The need to feel differently about ones self - special > The permission to be well despite the medical community > Another approach to health or spiritual experience > An entity incursion into your energetic and physical body. > There are too many more to list. > > These are not " bad " reasons though the entity issue can be a > challenge. They are just not related to Kundalini in as much as they > are related to dysfunctional issues of our society. And from that > vantage point Rieki, as practiced today, does serve a purpose. But > not towards the activation - in most cases - of the Kundalini. > > If a person is already leaning towards this Kundalini experience > then the Rieki may be the proverbial straw. > > Most Kundalini Rieki practitioners do not in actuality have the > Kundalini. They have an ego oriented, self sustaining wish > fulfillment or an embedded entity among other scenarios imho. > > As they do not understand or > know what the Kundalini feels like or it's dynamic upon the body and > they are only symptom oriented, they > go with what they feel right or wrong, good if it feels good, bad if > it feels bad, imagined or otherwise, often blinded by ignorance of > an entity coursing through the > body. > > Not all but many do have this issue and because of the problems that > can ensue I do not support or embrace or in any way encourage people > to purchase or receive " attunements " designed to awaken the > Kundalini. > > Dr. Usui, the founder of Rieki, EARNED his activation basically by > doing what amounts to the " safeties " as described on this site. He > helped and served his fellow human beings. Most often for FREE. He > meditated for weeks in a cave on the side of a mountain and was > willing to stay there until he died if he didn't receive the gift he > was searching for. This was what we call Kundalini, what he called > Rieki. He used this > force with honor and love in service to others diligently. Not for > self aggrandizement or commercial interests. The qualities of > transfer of this energy are negated by the individual's lack of > selfless service and other aspects of nascent cultivation. > > I am not labeling all Rieki practitioners in a negative > light " some " , a very precious few, > are very positive love based people who get it. Some have awakened > the > Kundalini. Most, the great majority, have not. Buyer beware. - > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 12, 2007 Report Share Posted August 12, 2007 As I understand it there is energy and it takes it many forms. Reiki is a technique intuitively received by Usui who was a meditator seeking to become enlightened. From his various backgrounds he combined elements and then found out how to use the reiki energy on himself. When he brought it to others then he did so as a tool to be used by individuals to enlighten themselves. He met with aspirants weekly and gave them treatments to boost their own energy, sort of like shaktipat. Then they were to use this energy boost to treat themselves with the hands on treatment to themselves. It was never intended by Usui that Reiki be used as a healing modality for other people and for money making, that all came after he died. Reiki basically invokes symbols, which resonate with various frequencies in the human body, which provide a clear and higher frequency with which your body can use this to heal itself (= make itself more aware). Reiki symbols are based on intent, and on kotodama which are basic sounds that activate certain energy centers in the body. The other basic thing to know is that any lying on of hands technique in an intentional way will create an energy loop in the body, boosting healing frequencies. This is the same thing that happens when one puts their tongue on the roof of their mouth... There is a free ebook on the history of Usui and the original intent of Reiki and also how to use Reiki on yourself on this website: http://johreiki.net/ The person who has this website is also authentic and will give free attunements. Gone are the days where you have to give money to people to be able to understand and give yourself Reiki. When I first used reiki on myself I knew it was what I needed, I felt the energy in myself respond to it, and my consciousness started rising immediately. I was on the hunt at the time for a way to rise my energetic vibration because I had observed from my various practices that I was doing intently that when my internal vibration was higher I was more aware. There was no doubt to me then that finding a way to increase my vibration would help me to become more aware. Then I dived into reiki and learned self treatment through experimentation and observation of the results, using my intuition on how to use reiki, it was only about a month later that the kundalini activated fully. I have typed up what I thought were the most pertinent and insightful aspects of the self-treatment using reiki that I found most effective. it's on my website: http://phoenixtools.org/tools/quickguide.htm So from this you can do reiki self-treatment without attunement or classes. Totally free, you only have to try it and observe and see if it's for you or not. Is kundalini the same as reiki? No, kundalini energy is the energy of yourself that lies dormant because it is suppressed by the dominance of your personality. You yourself are holding kundalini energy dormant. The more you get out of the way, the more it reveals itself. Reiki energy is directed by you with the intention to resonate with certain predefined frequencies (Chokurei and seiheiki, besides others), which boost your own frequency. So in a sense reiki energy is also yourself, just that you are resonating to another frequency. You can change your frequency via entrainment and resonance from chyrstals, metal rings, from nature, from people you hang around with, etc, with or without intention. Universal energy could be understood to be energy that permeates everything so is also part of everything, which of course includes yourself. In it's unformed state all energy has the same source and is the same, yet there is no energy that is not unformed, it is all formed. So the form, resonates with it's own vibration, it's unique signature. Can one channel universal energy? Doesn't seem possible, to be able to access anything, you have to give it a form, an intention. But this is the great thing, with our mind and our emotions we can form an intention and make it possible to manifest what we want. Betsy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 12, 2007 Report Share Posted August 12, 2007 Yes, reminds me of the verse that goes " by their fruits ye shall know them " . There are a lot of people out there who think they know something or seem as though they have special knowledge that the rest of us are not privy to. When you question their beliefs, even slightly, you stir up a hornets nest. Many are not interested in a little challenge, they just want you to accept what they say as law and leave it at that. Someone who has true knowledge will welcome challenges and offer explanations in order to help you understand and will never try to take away your free will. There is none so dangerous as someone with just enough knowledge to be a detriment to others. Especially when there are those listening who take this as truth because the person sounds like they are an authority. Yes, this ties in with religion very closely unfortunately. Thanks for posting your thoughts Dhyana. Sarita , " novalees " <Novalees wrote: > > > I read and pondered this thread on Kundalini and Reiki last > night...and slept on it as well. > > This morning during meditation I was shown that there is also a > parallel within the experience of (don't know the exact terms) when > receiving the Light from the top down, and also within some Christian > Churches and Denominations. > > I saw that many things are built up around the Reality, even when it > is not actively present and lived. That explains a lot of things to me. > > The Scripture verse that came to my mind was, " With their lips they > praise Me, but their hearts are far from Me. " > > When Kundalini and Spirit are not truly active in a life, and that > life parades along as if it is, then many can be deceived and robbed. > I left many situations where all the right trappings were there, but > no true substance. I am grateful for this further understanding about > it. Many times I wondered why I couldn't fit in. Now I see it clearly. > I was told many times " not to rock the boat. " My heart response was > always, " I won't rock it, I'll sink the ------ thing. " > > Thank you for this thread everyone. > Love, dhyana Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 12, 2007 Report Share Posted August 12, 2007 Thanks for the info Betsy and the links. I will read over the info. Sarita , " betsy " <ystebanar wrote: > > As I understand it there is energy and it takes it many forms. Reiki is a technique intuitively > received by Usui who was a meditator seeking to become enlightened. From his various > backgrounds he combined elements and then found out how to use the reiki energy on > himself. When he brought it to others then he did so as a tool to be used by individuals > to enlighten themselves. He met with aspirants weekly and gave them treatments to Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.