bodily weirdness! - Paul -Karma

[Guest guest]

Maybe I am not understanding this whole concept. How can it be a BAD

thing to heal others? Isn't this part of doing service? Wouldn't it

be an oxymoron to take on someone else's bad Karma by doing a good

deed?

 

I would also like to clarify the detachment issue. Does this mean

that you begin to care less for your loved ones? That they mean less

to you? Or that you worry less because you are more spiritually

evolved?

 

Sarita

 

, " Paul F "

<paulffff wrote:

>

> Thanks for the in-depth answer. Considering only this aspect, it

sounds

> like you are still creating karma, and thus will return to this

world again,

> something I guess is generally not desired if full enlightenment

can be

> obtained. From a strictly karmic standpoint, it seems that it

would be

> better to not heal others, and to maintain a feeling of non-

attachment. But

> of course, there are other aspects to spirituality than just karma,

and I'm

> sure that benefits of love dwarfs the repercussions. Still, to my

limited

> consiousness, it seems that it would be very tricky healing people

in

> hospitals and other places, without karma becoming an issue for

you. I'm

> sure all this will be clear for me in time.

>

> Thanks again chrism

> Blessings to all...

> Paul

>

> ....Golden Handcuffs are the guaranteed promise of another ride on

the wheel

> of incarnation by virtue of goodness. The other side of that would

be the

> badness that we do.

>

> ..... From a Kundalini standpoint this is where non-attachment can

play a big

> role. As you become unattached to the material aspects of earthly

life you

> begin to distance yourself from another excursion here in a new

body. Some

> few here are having the feelings of non attachment come to them and

this is

> good an natural. Part of the Kundalini process.

>

> _______________

> Get a FREE Web site, company branded e-mail and more from Microsoft

Office

> Live! http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/mcrssaub0050001411mrt/direct/01/

>

[Guest guest]

Pardon my inability at explanation. Let me add to the previous answer. Love is

the great balancer. Selfless service meaning that which is not intended for

recompense does not carry a dept, golden or otherwise. Charities are often used

as a place for tax reduction and other issues of wealth and they are good

devices but they are not unattached. Non attachment is a lesson directed to

materialism,. body being beautiful or ego driven desires as in power or

position. Personal aggrandizement, or material wealth. These are what can be

seen as areas for non-attachment to be placed. Love is not that area. Love that

is of a higher purpose. Certain qualities of love that are based in need are not

what I mean.

 

When I go into the hospitals they do not even know my name. I give, and allow

them to receive what is appropriate for them. I do not wait and see about

results.

 

Helping someone cross the street. Helping someone over an illness, Helping a

child find its parents, helping or providing a service behind the scenes without

an " attaboy " ' or an " attagiirl. " Stopping at the scene of an accident and

pulling someone out of a car or giving aid. These are not Golden unless you

attach a quality of wanting to be noticed or desiring to be seen as the helper

or the hero or heroine. These are fine and yes they are positive but they do

incur a reverse karmic dept. In many cases. They become Golden. Not always as we

are individuals. I am giving broad outlines here.

 

So much is based in how the person views the actions being committed. And what

if any expectations are being put in place. Your attitude counts.

 

When you reach a point of allowing the goodness of service to be your guidance

and eschew the notoriety of the good deed or helpful service,olr any though of

" pay back " then you are erasing Karma. Or balancing it. This has been and is the

understanding of it in this area that I have. -

 

 

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

Sarita <sarita1969 wrote: Or that you worry less because

you are more spiritually

evolved?

 

This is closer to the idea. You stay engaged with your loved ones but from a

higer point of view and you are guided in this as well. -

 

 

Recent Activity

 

7

New Members

 

Visit Your Group

360°

Get Started

Your place online

To share your life

 

Y! GeoCities

Be Vocal

Publish your opi-

nions with a blog.

 

Need traffic?

Drive customers

With search ads

on

 

 

 

.

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

It seems to me that those who get into healing or other " service " for

the purpose of recognition, to show off or to lift themselves up are

NOT doing self less acts. They are feeding their own needs and

although they may be doing good, I would expect there to be Karmic

consequences.

 

I have come across people who help others to gratify themselves, in

fact, it almost seems like an addiction to them. They frolick in the

adulation, it makes them high.

 

My mother often does things anonymously, not wanting the attention.

If I am correct, that would fall under selfless acts that pay off

Karmic debt.

 

Sarita

[Guest guest]

Okay - thank you once more chrism. I think that my primary problem at this

point is that I don't know enough about the healing process. (Those of you

well beyond my stage please pardon me.) To give you an example, my wife's

mom has been recently discovered to have alzheimer's. My wife is in Brazil

with her family for a few weeks, and they are having a rough time. She

asked me for healing energy for her mom and energy for strength for her and

all her family. At my stage, I only know to visualize energy from my heart

flowing to her mom's apartment (and to other households that I've visited

there), seeing them as peaceful, loving and happy. I can visualize her mom,

I can visualize a blue or white wave of energy from " me " surrounding her

making her calm and happy. Am I going too far with this? I know and love

her mom - she is a very sweet person, but I want to understand where the

line is that I should not cross. I don't think that the " selfless " part of

this will be an issue - they are far away from me and could not know.

 

By the way, since I'm on the subject, if it is proper, I guess I should make

the same request of this group that my wife has made of me. Her family is

very special. She is from a large family (my wife is the last of 15 kids).

Since my wife's dad died in 1992, her mom has not wanted to sleep alone, so

they have taken turns staying with her each and every night. They are all

very close, and they are all suffering now. Any appropriate energy or

healing would be much appreciated.

 

Thank you chrism and the group..

 

Many blesssings

Paul

 

 

> <>

>

>

>RE: Re: bodily weirdness! - Paul

>-Karma

>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 21:05:53 -0700 (PDT)

>

>Pardon my inability at explanation. Let me add to the previous answer. Love

>is the great balancer. Selfless service meaning that which is not intended

>for recompense does not carry a dept, golden or otherwise. Charities are

>often used as a place for tax reduction and other issues of wealth and they

>are good devices but they are not unattached. Non attachment is a lesson

>directed to materialism,. body being beautiful or ego driven desires as in

>power or position. Personal aggrandizement, or material wealth. These are

>what can be seen as areas for non-attachment to be placed. Love is not that

>area. Love that is of a higher purpose. Certain qualities of love that are

>based in need are not what I mean.

>

> When I go into the hospitals they do not even know my name. I give, and

>allow them to receive what is appropriate for them. I do not wait and see

>about results.

>

> Helping someone cross the street. Helping someone over an illness,

>Helping a child find its parents, helping or providing a service behind the

>scenes without an " attaboy " ' or an " attagiirl. " Stopping at the scene of an

>accident and pulling someone out of a car or giving aid. These are not

>Golden unless you attach a quality of wanting to be noticed or desiring to

>be seen as the helper or the hero or heroine. These are fine and yes they

>are positive but they do incur a reverse karmic dept. In many cases. They

>become Golden. Not always as we are individuals. I am giving broad outlines

>here.

>

> So much is based in how the person views the actions being committed.

>And what if any expectations are being put in place. Your attitude counts.

>

> When you reach a point of allowing the goodness of service to be your

>guidance and eschew the notoriety of the good deed or helpful service,olr

>any though of " pay back " then you are erasing Karma. Or balancing it. This

>has been and is the understanding of it in this area that I have. -

>

>

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Paul if you would give us your mother-in-laws name I will send energy to her.

May peace and love be with you!

 

Love,

Katherine

 

Paul F <paulffff wrote:

Okay - thank you once more chrism. I think that my primary problem at this

point is that I don't know enough about the healing process. (Those of you

well beyond my stage please pardon me.) To give you an example, my wife's

mom has been recently discovered to have alzheimer's. My wife is in Brazil

with her family for a few weeks, and they are having a rough time. She

asked me for healing energy for her mom and energy for strength for her and

all her family. At my stage, I only know to visualize energy from my heart

flowing to her mom's apartment (and to other households that I've visited

there), seeing them as peaceful, loving and happy. I can visualize her mom,

I can visualize a blue or white wave of energy from " me " surrounding her

making her calm and happy. Am I going too far with this? I know and love

her mom - she is a very sweet person, but I want to understand where the

line is that I should not cross. I don't think that the " selfless " part of

this will be an issue - they are far away from me and could not know.

 

By the way, since I'm on the subject, if it is proper, I guess I should make

the same request of this group that my wife has made of me. Her family is

very special. She is from a large family (my wife is the last of 15 kids).

Since my wife's dad died in 1992, her mom has not wanted to sleep alone, so

they have taken turns staying with her each and every night. They are all

very close, and they are all suffering now. Any appropriate energy or

healing would be much appreciated.

 

Thank you chrism and the group..

 

Many blesssings

Paul

 

 

>

>

>

>RE: Re: bodily weirdness! - Paul

>-Karma

>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 21:05:53 -0700 (PDT)

>

>Pardon my inability at explanation. Let me add to the previous answer. Love

>is the great balancer. Selfless service meaning that which is not intended

>for recompense does not carry a dept, golden or otherwise. Charities are

>often used as a place for tax reduction and other issues of wealth and they

>are good devices but they are not unattached. Non attachment is a lesson

>directed to materialism,. body being beautiful or ego driven desires as in

>power or position. Personal aggrandizement, or material wealth. These are

>what can be seen as areas for non-attachment to be placed. Love is not that

>area. Love that is of a higher purpose. Certain qualities of love that are

>based in need are not what I mean.

>

> When I go into the hospitals they do not even know my name. I give, and

>allow them to receive what is appropriate for them. I do not wait and see

>about results.

>

> Helping someone cross the street. Helping someone over an illness,

>Helping a child find its parents, helping or providing a service behind the

>scenes without an " attaboy " ' or an " attagiirl. " Stopping at the scene of an

>accident and pulling someone out of a car or giving aid. These are not

>Golden unless you attach a quality of wanting to be noticed or desiring to

>be seen as the helper or the hero or heroine. These are fine and yes they

>are positive but they do incur a reverse karmic dept. In many cases. They

>become Golden. Not always as we are individuals. I am giving broad outlines

>here.

>

> So much is based in how the person views the actions being committed.

>And what if any expectations are being put in place. Your attitude counts.

>

> When you reach a point of allowing the goodness of service to be your

>guidance and eschew the notoriety of the good deed or helpful service,olr

>any though of " pay back " then you are erasing Karma. Or balancing it. This

>has been and is the understanding of it in this area that I have. -

>

>

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Okay, to keep chrism from having to make another long reply and repeat what

he's already told me, I will try once more and stop. :-) I think I am over

complicating things.... 'blame it on things that I read earlier in life

about karma. So in general, if love or energy is selfless, then I should

not have to worry about karmic repercussions - the karma of the other

individual or that person's higher self would either use or ignore the

energy? If this is true, then it's very simple, and I like simple. :-)

 

Thanks

Paul

 

_______________

Watch free concerts with Pink, Rod Stewart, Oasis and more. Visit MSN

Presents today.

http://music.msn.com/presents?icid=ncmsnpresentstagline & ocid=T002MSN03A07001

[Guest guest]

Thank you Katherine. I hope that peace and love is always with you too.

Her name is Maria.

 

Blessings ...

Paul

 

>Katherine Miller <katsam19

>

>

>RE: Re: bodily weirdness! - Paul

>-Karma

>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 06:33:58 -0700 (PDT)

>

>Paul if you would give us your mother-in-laws name I will send energy to

>her. May peace and love be with you!

>

> Love,

> Katherine

>

>Paul F <paulffff wrote:

> Okay - thank you once more chrism. I think that my primary problem at

>this

>point is that I don't know enough about the healing process. (Those of you

>well beyond my stage please pardon me.) To give you an example, my wife's

>mom has been recently discovered to have alzheimer's. My wife is in Brazil

>with her family for a few weeks, and they are having a rough time. She

>asked me for healing energy for her mom and energy for strength for her and

>all her family. At my stage, I only know to visualize energy from my heart

>flowing to her mom's apartment (and to other households that I've visited

>there), seeing them as peaceful, loving and happy. I can visualize her mom,

>I can visualize a blue or white wave of energy from " me " surrounding her

>making her calm and happy. Am I going too far with this? I know and love

>her mom - she is a very sweet person, but I want to understand where the

>line is that I should not cross. I don't think that the " selfless " part of

>this will be an issue - they are far away from me and could not know.

>

>By the way, since I'm on the subject, if it is proper, I guess I should

>make

>the same request of this group that my wife has made of me. Her family is

>very special. She is from a large family (my wife is the last of 15 kids).

>Since my wife's dad died in 1992, her mom has not wanted to sleep alone, so

>they have taken turns staying with her each and every night. They are all

>very close, and they are all suffering now. Any appropriate energy or

>healing would be much appreciated.

>

>Thank you chrism and the group..

>

>Many blesssings

>Paul

>

>

> >

> >

> >

> >RE: Re: bodily weirdness! - Paul

> >-Karma

> >Sat, 24 Mar 2007 21:05:53 -0700 (PDT)

> >

> >Pardon my inability at explanation. Let me add to the previous answer.

>Love

> >is the great balancer. Selfless service meaning that which is not

>intended

> >for recompense does not carry a dept, golden or otherwise. Charities are

> >often used as a place for tax reduction and other issues of wealth and

>they

> >are good devices but they are not unattached. Non attachment is a lesson

> >directed to materialism,. body being beautiful or ego driven desires as

>in

> >power or position. Personal aggrandizement, or material wealth. These are

> >what can be seen as areas for non-attachment to be placed. Love is not

>that

> >area. Love that is of a higher purpose. Certain qualities of love that

>are

> >based in need are not what I mean.

> >

> > When I go into the hospitals they do not even know my name. I give, and

> >allow them to receive what is appropriate for them. I do not wait and see

> >about results.

> >

> > Helping someone cross the street. Helping someone over an illness,

> >Helping a child find its parents, helping or providing a service behind

>the

> >scenes without an " attaboy " ' or an " attagiirl. " Stopping at the scene of

>an

> >accident and pulling someone out of a car or giving aid. These are not

> >Golden unless you attach a quality of wanting to be noticed or desiring

>to

> >be seen as the helper or the hero or heroine. These are fine and yes they

> >are positive but they do incur a reverse karmic dept. In many cases. They

> >become Golden. Not always as we are individuals. I am giving broad

>outlines

> >here.

> >

> > So much is based in how the person views the actions being committed.

> >And what if any expectations are being put in place. Your attitude

>counts.

> >

> > When you reach a point of allowing the goodness of service to be your

> >guidance and eschew the notoriety of the good deed or helpful service,olr

> >any though of " pay back " then you are erasing Karma. Or balancing it.

>This

> >has been and is the understanding of it in this area that I have. -

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

[Guest guest]

To write this in a form that is understandable, as long as the love or

energy is selfless, then the use of the energy would either be used or not

used in accordance with that person's higher self, and the dictates of

karma....

 

 

> " Paul F " <paulffff

>

>

>RE: Re: bodily weirdness! - Paul

>-Karma

>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 09:38:39 -0400

>

>Okay, to keep chrism from having to make another long reply and repeat what

>he's already told me, I will try once more and stop. :-) I think I am over

>complicating things.... 'blame it on things that I read earlier in life

>about karma. So in general, if love or energy is selfless, then I should

>not have to worry about karmic repercussions - the karma of the other

>individual or that person's higher self would either use or ignore the

>energy? If this is true, then it's very simple, and I like simple. :-)

>

>Thanks

>Paul

>

>_______________

>Watch free concerts with Pink, Rod Stewart, Oasis and more. Visit MSN

>Presents today.

>http://music.msn.com/presents?icid=ncmsnpresentstagline & ocid=T002MSN03A07001

>

 

_______________

The average US Credit Score is 675. The cost to see yours: $0 by Experian.

http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=660600 & bcd=EMAILFOOTERAVERAGE

[Guest guest]

Hey Paul,

 

I'm certainly no expert on healing and energy work. However I would

just say that when you send the energy, visualize or pray- I think a

simple addition of " For the highest good of all concerned " is all you

need. Dis-ease is all serving some higher purspose. Who is to know what

exact lesson each individual or group is going through? When someone's

time has come? Perhaps the energy you send is not best used in

actually 'healing the illness' but in helping the individual find the

best possible way to learn whatever the lesson is as quickly and as

efficiently as possible. For example, if a slow lingering death was

agreed upon by an individual to help open another's heart, our

overattachment to one outcome (healing the sick person) might not be

helping. When we send it to the situation with the highest good of all

concerned stipulated, our higher selves are more free to use the energy

for the best outcome for everyone. So we send the energy thinking of

the best possible outcome, even if we are not sure of that is... And we

let it go. The universe/god is infinitely more wise than I! And yet we

are part of it, and I am sure our positive intentions are indeed very

welcome and encouraged. Send all the loving thoughts and energy you can

manage, fear not!

 

Cheers,

 

Bradly

 

PS: Any more experienced healers on the list please add or comment!

[Guest guest]

A very good way of putting it Bradly -

 

curball2002 <curball2002 wrote: Hey Paul,

 

I'm certainly no expert on healing and energy work. However I would

just say that when you send the energy, visualize or pray- I think a

simple addition of " For the highest good of all concerned " is all you

need. Dis-ease is all serving some higher purspose. Who is to know what

exact lesson each individual or group is going through? When someone's

time has come? Perhaps the energy you send is not best used in

actually 'healing the illness' but in helping the individual find the

best possible way to learn whatever the lesson is as quickly and as

efficiently as possible. For example, if a slow lingering death was

agreed upon by an individual to help open another's heart, our

overattachment to one outcome (healing the sick person) might not be

helping. When we send it to the situation with the highest good of all

concerned stipulated, our higher selves are more free to use the energy

for the best outcome for everyone. So we send the energy thinking of

the best possible outcome, even if we are not sure of that is... And we

let it go. The universe/god is infinitely more wise than I! And yet we

are part of it, and I am sure our positive intentions are indeed very

welcome and encouraged. Send all the loving thoughts and energy you can

manage, fear not!

 

Cheers,

 

Bradly

 

PS: Any more experienced healers on the list please add or comment!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

Thanks Bradly... It's amazing how the small points can bog you down. :-)

 

And thanks for the patience of the group!

 

Blessings

Paul

 

 

> " curball2002 " <curball2002

>

>

> Re: bodily weirdness! - Paul

>-Karma

>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 14:19:29 -0000

>

>Hey Paul,

>

>I'm certainly no expert on healing and energy work. However I would

>just say that when you send the energy, visualize or pray- I think a

>simple addition of " For the highest good of all concerned " is all you

>need. Dis-ease is all serving some higher purspose. Who is to know what

>exact lesson each individual or group is going through? When someone's

>time has come? Perhaps the energy you send is not best used in

>actually 'healing the illness' but in helping the individual find the

>best possible way to learn whatever the lesson is as quickly and as

>efficiently as possible. For example, if a slow lingering death was

>agreed upon by an individual to help open another's heart, our

>overattachment to one outcome (healing the sick person) might not be

>helping. When we send it to the situation with the highest good of all

>concerned stipulated, our higher selves are more free to use the energy

>for the best outcome for everyone. So we send the energy thinking of

>the best possible outcome, even if we are not sure of that is... And we

>let it go. The universe/god is infinitely more wise than I! And yet we

>are part of it, and I am sure our positive intentions are indeed very

>welcome and encouraged. Send all the loving thoughts and energy you can

>manage, fear not!

>

>Cheers,

>

>Bradly

>

>PS: Any more experienced healers on the list please add or comment!

>

>

 

_______________

Interest Rates near 39yr lows! $430,000 Mortgage for $1,399/mo - Calculate

new payment

http://www.lowermybills.com/lre/index.jsp?sourceid=lmb-9632-18466 & moid=7581

[Guest guest]

Well, this answers a question I was going to ask! I work in an

Oncology office and I was going to ask about sending healing energy

to the cancer patients and what the ramifications are. But what you

say makes perfect sense. Send the energy with the intent that

whatever is for the higher good is done with it and there is no

chance for complication.

 

Sarita

 

, " curball2002 "

<curball2002 wrote:

>

> Hey Paul,

>

> I'm certainly no expert on healing and energy work. However I would

> just say that when you send the energy, visualize or pray- I think

a

> simple addition of " For the highest good of all concerned " is all

you

> need. Dis-ease is all serving some higher purspose. Who is to know

what

> exact lesson each individual or group is going through? When

someone's

> time has come? Perhaps the energy you send is not best used in

> actually 'healing the illness' but in helping the individual find

the

> best possible way to learn whatever the lesson is as quickly and as

> efficiently as possible. For example, if a slow lingering death was

> agreed upon by an individual to help open another's heart, our

> overattachment to one outcome (healing the sick person) might not

be

> helping. When we send it to the situation with the highest good of

all

> concerned stipulated, our higher selves are more free to use the

energy

> for the best outcome for everyone. So we send the energy thinking

of

> the best possible outcome, even if we are not sure of that is...

And we

> let it go. The universe/god is infinitely more wise than I! And yet

we

> are part of it, and I am sure our positive intentions are indeed

very

> welcome and encouraged. Send all the loving thoughts and energy you

can

> manage, fear not!

>

> Cheers,

>

> Bradly

>

> PS: Any more experienced healers on the list please add or comment!

>

[Guest guest]

Hi Bradley, Paul,

 

What you describe is how I was shown to do healing by my guides. My

description was 'unconditional love' which I understand has the same

meaning as " self-less healing " .

 

I step into a persons physcial space, or send astrally 'unconditional

love' then step back or close off and disconnect. I don't start with

the intent to heal any situation or person, I don't check afterwards

to see what healing or outcome has occured. I totally disconnect and

move onto something else.

 

The original Polarity Therapy by Dr Randolf Stone was based on this

concept and my guidence directed me to study it and practice it.

 

Some people/situations are meant to be healed....some aren't healed

because they have chosen to learn lessons or gain first hand

experience in difficult situations - for their souls evolution and

growth - this often cultivates compassion and empathy in a person as

well.

 

Namaste..

Amaargi

 

, " curball2002 "

<curball2002 wrote:

>

> Hey Paul,

>

> I'm certainly no expert on healing and energy work. However I would

> just say that when you send the energy, visualize or pray- I think

a

> simple addition of " For the highest good of all concerned " is all

you

> need. Dis-ease is all serving some higher purspose. Who is to know

what

> exact lesson each individual or group is going through? When

someone's

> time has come? Perhaps the energy you send is not best used in

> actually 'healing the illness' but in helping the individual find

the

> best possible way to learn whatever the lesson is as quickly and as

> efficiently as possible. For example, if a slow lingering death was

> agreed upon by an individual to help open another's heart, our

> overattachment to one outcome (healing the sick person) might not

be

> helping. When we send it to the situation with the highest good of

all

> concerned stipulated, our higher selves are more free to use the

energy

> for the best outcome for everyone. So we send the energy thinking

of

> the best possible outcome, even if we are not sure of that is...

And we

> let it go. The universe/god is infinitely more wise than I! And yet

we

> are part of it, and I am sure our positive intentions are indeed

very

> welcome and encouraged. Send all the loving thoughts and energy you

can

> manage, fear not!

>

> Cheers,

>

> Bradly

>

> PS: Any more experienced healers on the list please add or comment!

>

[Guest guest]

Thanks Amaargi - I find this very interesting. I looked at volume 1 of

Polarity Therapy on Amazon and this is definitely a study in itself.

Perhaps it is best for me to not mix it with the Kundalini for now, but I'll

mark it on my list of things to eventually buy.

Thank you very much.

 

And chrism, I felt your pain in trying to explain this stuff to the newbie

(myself). I almost turned into the classic example of a newbie.. one who

asks too many questions and analyzes too much. But I appreciate your's and

everyone else's input, and I do have a better understanding now.

 

Blessings to all...

 

Paul

 

> " ama_ar_gi " <ama_ar_gi

>

>

> Re: bodily weirdness! - Paul

>-Karma

>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 00:35:44 -0000

>

>Hi Bradley, Paul,

>

>What you describe is how I was shown to do healing by my guides...

 

_______________

Mortgage refinance is hot 1) Rates near 30-yr lows 2) Good credit get

intro-rate 4.625%*

https://www2.nextag.com/goto.jsp?product=100000035 & url=%2fst.jsp & tm=y & search=mor\

tgage_text_links_88_h2a5f & s=4056 & p=5117 & disc=y & vers=743

[Guest guest]

Paul, you are far from alone in the Newbie-Boat! I'm right there

with you, learning every day. This is a terrific place to do it too,

non judgemental and patient.

 

Sarita

 

, " Paul F "

<paulffff wrote:

 

> And chrism, I felt your pain in trying to explain this stuff to the

newbie

> (myself). I almost turned into the classic example of a newbie..

one who

> asks too many questions and analyzes too much. But I appreciate

your's and

> everyone else's input, and I do have a better understanding now.

>

> Blessings to all...

>

> Paul

>

> > " ama_ar_gi " <ama_ar_gi

> >

> >

> > Re: bodily weirdness! -

Paul

> >-Karma

> >Mon, 26 Mar 2007 00:35:44 -0000

> >

> >Hi Bradley, Paul,

> >

> >What you describe is how I was shown to do healing by my guides...

>

> _______________

> Mortgage refinance is hot 1) Rates near 30-yr lows 2) Good credit

get

> intro-rate 4.625%*

> https://www2.nextag.com/goto.jsp?product=100000035 & url=%

2fst.jsp & tm=y & search=mortgage_text_links_88_h2a5f & s=4056 & p=5117 & disc=y

& vers=743

>

[Guest guest]

My lack of a coherent response isn't your fault. It is good and appropriate to

be mindful of these issues. Please keep asking questions as they represent

others who have the same questions = we all can learn. - blessings Paul -

chrism

 

Paul F <paulffff wrote: Thanks Amaargi - I find this very

interesting. I looked at volume 1 of

Polarity Therapy on Amazon and this is definitely a study in itself.

Perhaps it is best for me to not mix it with the Kundalini for now, but I'll

mark it on my list of things to eventually buy.

Thank you very much.

 

And chrism, I felt your pain in trying to explain this stuff to the newbie

(myself). I almost turned into the classic example of a newbie.. one who

asks too many questions and analyzes too much. But I appreciate your's and

everyone else's input, and I do have a better understanding now.

 

Blessings to all...

 

Paul

 

> " ama_ar_gi " <ama_ar_gi

>

>

> Re: bodily weirdness! - Paul

>-Karma

>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 00:35:44 -0000

>

>Hi Bradley, Paul,

>

>What you describe is how I was shown to do healing by my guides...

 

________

Mortgage refinance is hot 1) Rates near 30-yr lows 2) Good credit get

intro-rate 4.625%*

https://www2.nextag.com/goto.jsp?product=100000035 & url=%2fst.jsp & tm=y & search=mor\

tgage_text_links_88_h2a5f & s=4056 & p=5117 & disc=y & vers=743

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

Hi Paul,

 

I had an abridged description about Polarity Therapy that was

included in a book on all types of spiritual healing, which explained

briefly the basic concept of uncondional love and then detachment was

the fundamental practise.

 

I never studied any further than that and haven't done any of the

hands on positions, hydro therapy, counselling etc that involves full

Polarity Therapy.

 

I send the energy of unconditional love out from within my heart/soul

for distance healing or give a nice general massage while the person

is in my aura physically. Something similar to a Shaktipat I suppose.

 

I don't think much more is needed than that, but thats only my

personal feeling and if anyone wants to go further and become a full

Polarity Therapy practioner I'm sure the receiver of the healing will

benefit greatly

 

It's best not to mix it with kundalini if you are processing any of

your own 'stuff'....you may get it all entangled and pass it along to

the other person.

 

It took me a long time to reach the complete 'unconditional' aspect

of love - no strings nor attachments at all. It will depend on what

we have to clear within first as to how long it will take to be able

to do it correctly.

 

Anyway, you'll know for yourself as you go along....Kundalini will

show you the way..

 

Amaargi

 

, " Paul F "

<paulffff wrote:

>

> Thanks Amaargi - I find this very interesting. I looked at volume

1 of

> Polarity Therapy on Amazon and this is definitely a study in

itself.

> Perhaps it is best for me to not mix it with the Kundalini for now,

but I'll

> mark it on my list of things to eventually buy.

> Thank you very much.

[Guest guest]

Thanks Sarita. It's good to know that I'm not the only one. :-) Yes,

there is a very nice group here, and we all ultimately share a common goal.

I feel fortunate to have found this site.

 

Thanks again for the kind words...

 

Blessings to all...

Paul

 

 

> " Sarita " <sarita1969

>

>

> Re: bodily weirdness! - Paul

>-Karma

>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 03:12:48 -0000

>

>Paul, you are far from alone in the Newbie-Boat! I'm right there

>with you, learning every day. This is a terrific place to do it too,

>non judgemental and patient.

>

>Sarita

>

> , " Paul F "

><paulffff wrote:

>

> > And chrism, I felt your pain in trying to explain this stuff to the

>newbie

> > (myself). I almost turned into the classic example of a newbie..

>one who

> > asks too many questions and analyzes too much. But I appreciate

>your's and

> > everyone else's input, and I do have a better understanding now.

> >

> > Blessings to all...

> >

> > Paul

> >

> > > " ama_ar_gi " <ama_ar_gi

> > >

> > >

> > > Re: bodily weirdness! -

>Paul

> > >-Karma

> > >Mon, 26 Mar 2007 00:35:44 -0000

> > >

> > >Hi Bradley, Paul,

> > >

> > >What you describe is how I was shown to do healing by my guides...

> >

> > _______________

> > Mortgage refinance is hot 1) Rates near 30-yr lows 2) Good credit

>get

> > intro-rate 4.625%*

> > https://www2.nextag.com/goto.jsp?product=100000035 & url=%

>2fst.jsp & tm=y & search=mortgage_text_links_88_h2a5f & s=4056 & p=5117 & disc=y

> & vers=743

> >

>

>

 

_______________

Watch free concerts with Pink, Rod Stewart, Oasis and more. Visit MSN

Presents today.

http://music.msn.com/presents?icid=ncmsnpresentstagline & ocid=T002MSN03A07001

[Guest guest]

Thanks Amaargi... I believe what you describe is all that I'll need for

now. And you're right, I don't want to confuse things further... one thing

at a time. :-)

 

Blessings..

 

Paul

 

 

> " ama_ar_gi " <ama_ar_gi

>

>

> Re: bodily weirdness! - Paul

>-Karma

>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 10:25:09 -0000

>

>Hi Paul,

>

>I had an abridged description about Polarity Therapy that was

>included in a book on all types of spiritual healing, which explained

>briefly the basic concept of uncondional love and then detachment was

>the fundamental practise.

>

>I never studied any further than that and haven't done any of the

>hands on positions, hydro therapy, counselling etc that involves full

>Polarity Therapy.

>

>I send the energy of unconditional love out from within my heart/soul

>for distance healing or give a nice general massage while the person

>is in my aura physically. Something similar to a Shaktipat I suppose.

>

>I don't think much more is needed than that, but thats only my

>personal feeling and if anyone wants to go further and become a full

>Polarity Therapy practioner I'm sure the receiver of the healing will

>benefit greatly

>

>It's best not to mix it with kundalini if you are processing any of

>your own 'stuff'....you may get it all entangled and pass it along to

>the other person.

>

>It took me a long time to reach the complete 'unconditional' aspect

>of love - no strings nor attachments at all. It will depend on what

>we have to clear within first as to how long it will take to be able

>to do it correctly.

>

>Anyway, you'll know for yourself as you go along....Kundalini will

>show you the way..

>

>Amaargi

>

> , " Paul F "

><paulffff wrote:

> >

> > Thanks Amaargi - I find this very interesting. I looked at volume

>1 of

> > Polarity Therapy on Amazon and this is definitely a study in

>itself.

> > Perhaps it is best for me to not mix it with the Kundalini for now,

>but I'll

> > mark it on my list of things to eventually buy.

> > Thank you very much.

>

>

 

_______________

It’s tax season, make sure to follow these few simple tips

http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Taxes/PreparationTips/PreparationTips.aspx?\

icid=HMMartagline