Guest guest Posted June 4, 2009 Report Posted June 4, 2009 *-http://www.indymedia.org/en/2009/06/925093.shtml -http://www.care2.com/news/member/859057233/1158824* On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 6:11 AM, Naresh Kadyan <kadyan.ipfa wrote: > *REMINDER - ONE:- > No doubt fake tiger skin not allowed then why fake beak but feathers was > original?, Delhi Police and Chief Wild Life Warden is responsible for delay, > where as undersigned spoken with the CWLW then intimation was given to the > vice chairman of the Wildlife Trust of India Ashok Kumar, we are very much > stick on our complaint for recovery / investigation and legal action if > anyone can found guilty. > > * > Dear friends, > > http://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/StoryPage.aspx?sectionName=HomePage & id=3\ 569a1e6-e61f-401f-b386-bfaf2d1114fa & Headline=MP+from+Arunachal+Pradesh+in+troubl\ e+over+hornbill+hat > Takam Sanjoy seemed like the MP least likely to make any news on day one of > the 15th Lok Sabha. But he did. In fact, he landed in a controversy — head > first. > > The MP from Arunachal Pradesh West, a constituency China wants, sat through > Monday's session sporting a traditional headgear of the state’s Nyishi > tribe, to which he belongs. Many of his fellow MPs admired the piece > embellished with a hornbill beak and feather. > > But BJP parliamentarian and animal activist Maneka Gandhi wasn’t impressed > and she reminded Sanjoy the hat was illegal. He later clarified the beak was > artificial but kept mum about the feather. > > A day later, with pictures of the MP in his headgear making it to most > newspapers, animal rights activists and conservationists are aghast at the > “display of animal body parts” in Parliament. > > “I am not aware if the display of rare wildlife body parts has debuted with > Sanjoy, but we expect the people in power to lead the way in dissuading such > practices,” Anuradha Sawhney of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals > told *HT* from Pune. > > “Tradition cannot be an excuse for such blatant displays; hiding behind > tradition is the worst form of offence for parliamentarians...” she added. > > The declining population of hornbills — less than 500 are estimated to > remain in the hills of Arunachal — had made the government ban hunting of > the bird. Wearing headgears embellished with the bird’s beak was also made > illegal. > > But these measures have failed to stop the headgear fetish among the > Nyishis and other tribes. > > The Wildlife Trust of India subsequently introduced artificial fibre glass > beaks to save the bird from extinction. Sanjoy isn’t the only politician to > make the green brigade see red. President Pratibha Patil and Rahul Gandhi > had irked them during recent trips to the Northeast. > > In Tawang last month, the President had donned a cap made from the fur of a > rare flying squirrel. “Organizers claimed it was made from yak hide but we > are not convinced,” said animal rights activist Azam Siddiqui. > > Rahul had sported a headgear with peacock feathers during his election > campaign in Manipur. > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Naresh Kadyan <kadyan.ipfa > Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 1:25 PM > 15th LOK SABHA MP WEARING WILDLIFE TROPHIES HORN BILLS BEAK CAP > WITH FEATHERS - VIOLATIONS OF WILDLIFE ACT, 1972 > " ys. dadwal ys. dadwal " <ys.dadwal > Cc: envisect, cza, Ashok Kumar <ashok, > shukla322 > > > Sir, > Kindly refer to the media reports and interview of newly elected MP from > north east wearing their traditional cap made out of the Horn Bill beak and > feathers, which is a violation of the WP Act, 1972, hence it is requested to > book this MP and recover the Wild Life Trophies............ > > -- > Naresh Kadyan, Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.