Guest guest Posted February 16, 2003 Report Posted February 16, 2003 If only I'd read all that. But of course, being by now convinced it's useless, I did not. On Sunday, February 16, 2003, at 08:15 PM, (AT) (DOT) com wrote: > There, that is probably enough to be going on with for now. The links > below, as well as being my references for quotes above, can provide > further > reading for those who are interested > > Lee-Gwen It is with words as with sunbeams, the more they are condensed, the deeper they burn. -Robert Southey (1774-1843) Quote
Guest guest Posted February 17, 2003 Report Posted February 17, 2003 - The Stewarts > Another syntactical quibble that adds nothing. If you say so. > We begin to see the pattern. Yes, I rather think we do - but I think that the patterns we perceive are different. > It would have been, perhaps, more Quakerly to have addressed the substance > of the question. Instead it's all a little word game, it seems. Was there substance in the question? Hmmm ... > Interesting what is revealed. Isn't it? > If only I'd read all that. > > But of course, being by now convinced it's useless, I did not. Trust me, I didn't really expect you to read it, although I do now feel that I have adequately discharged this particular duty. Hopefully, there is someone here for whom the information I provided has been useful. Lee-Gwen (the not even slightly piqued Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.