Guest guest Posted October 26, 2005 Report Share Posted October 26, 2005 Greetings raw family, The news of baby Woyah’s death is deeply saddening. My thoughts and hopes for healing go out to her family. Adding to the troubling news is the contradictory, source-less information in the ‘news’ article and online at http://rawfriends.com/andressohns.html. I find it curious that the rawfriends site does not mention her weight, or lack thereof. Perhaps, without access to the original sources – hospital staff, the parents, doctors and the other children, commenting is premature. However, I feel the need to say a few words that are bigger than this situation: First, I must reflect the comments of others and reiterate that breastmilk is the healthiest nourishment possible for young babies and should be consumed as long as is sustainable to mother and child – often more than 6 months. In many tribal cultures it is the norm to breastfeed up to four years old. Hopefully young Woyah was being breastfed. Secondly -- and I realize that this may have been misinformation in the news article -- babies do not need enemas!!!! (Much less wheat grass enemas!) Their beautiful digestive systems usually work very efficiently, as mothers know all too well. Babies need to build up the natural flora in their digestive systems, and I sincerely hope Woyah was not subjected to enemas. That seems, in addition, an incredibly physical violation for a baby to experience unless under dire circumstances of need – and I do not count being severely underweight as a proper condition that would warrant enemas in babies. Third, I know that children are often manipulated, but I would respectfully disagree that they are more vulnerable to manipulation than adults. From what I understand, they can be administered lie detectors like adults. A good defense attorney with a psychologist will hopefully be able to choose questions for the children so that they can answer truthfully about their experience in that household. They certainly look beautiful and healthy in the online pictures. Finally, what I think this article reflects most of all is the deep need to Teach Not Preach about the raw lifestyle. The first step of this process would be to publicly acknowledge that as a community we have differing experiences and practices. We are a beautiful and wide spectrum of variety. Second, to meet people where they are: The moment in which we become self-righteous that we “Know” the answer to all ills is the moment that we become most ignorant of all. There is much validity and honor and health in vegetarian and cooked vegan lifestyles, and in traditional or native diets that include cooking and meat. Above all, we must communicate from a place of respect for humanity’s choices. Next, we must become media-savvy as a raw foods movement, the same as the environmental movement has to know how to work the media. I suggest that submit an op-ed to the newspaper of this couple’s hometown, in addition to sending out (proactively) press releases about our movement to newspapers and media sources across the country or even worldwide. This might be best authored by a mother (I volunteer to edit or the whole listserv could offer editing advice) who has raised raw, or mostly raw children. Other powerful contributors or op-ed authors could be those who have experienced harsh responses (perhaps by institutions or government) to their lifestyle choice. Maybe this kind of proactive education campaign can prevent a future “Woyah” and earn this community a deeper respect. Thanks for hearing my words. Please contact me if you wish to write an OpEd/press release and might want a second eye for it. With thanks, Ariele ---- support good food for all www.communityharvestdc.org Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.