Guest guest Posted December 16, 2001 Report Posted December 16, 2001 Letter to Editor - Re: Microchipping of dogs - The Star 8th Nov. 2001. I refer to the proposed Bill requiring all dog owners to microchip their animals. I cannot bear to see dogs abandoned and fending for themselves on the streets and in market places. To cut down on their numbers, I have often mingled with people to remind them of their responsibility to neuter their pets. Visits to the vet for vaccinations, check-ups and spaying are considered burdensome. To be fair, some households find it hard to pay for the cost of the operation. In such an environment, the introduction of a measure aimed at preventing pet thefts and establishing rightful ownership in the event of a loss, is surely irrelevant. It is good only for pedigree dog owners whose numbers are small compared to the vast majority of households that own mixed and mongrel breeds. I appeal to the authorities not to make the measure compulsory. Let it be optional. Otherwise, I foresee an increase in the number of animals just turned out of households because their owners will not microchop them. Letter to Editor to " Preserve wildlife " - The Star 15th Dec. 2001 The recent trapping of two tiger cubs in Ipoh highlights the appalling way in which we deal with wildlife in Malaysia. Trapping the cubs, although not intentional and putting them in the Taiping Zoo is a convenient and short-term solution to a larger problem. I should say it was a blessing in disguise that the cubs were trapped first. At least they will have a good chance of survival, albeit in an environment as artificial as a zoo. Had the mother of these cubs been trapped, as originally intended, the cubs could have perished eventually, being too young to hunt for food. We would have contributed to the statistics of their dwindling population. And I won't even mention the trauma of being separated from their mother. Does anyone have statistics about tiger survival in captivity? Enlighten me please. We must remember that in the first place, the tigers became a threat to the villagers in Kampung Kerawat Baru because we have encroached upon their domain. Having pillaged the forest which was their home, we have made food supply scarce, forcing them to find alternative hunting grounds, which inevitably brings them closer to human contact, endangering both species. Tigers are wild animals. They do not belong in the zoo for our amusement. Can we not look into a national/wildlife park that is not only a natural habitat for these animals but also secluded enough that humans and tigers (and other wildlife) no not encroach upon one another. It's an uphill task, but with concerted effort by wildlife authorities, the Government and non-governmental organisations, I am positive something worthwhile is feasible. Perhaps we can study how countries like Kenya and Tanzania maintain their world famous wildlife parks. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.