Guest guest Posted September 15, 2004 Report Posted September 15, 2004 Thanks Gina. I'm a budding [pun intended] horticulturist. Jointly conducting a plant tissue culture workshop this weekend at the local college. Okay on the meat question. I don't mean to be too verbose on this topic, I am just trying to nail down my understanding of vegetarianism. So, even if the meat could be produced in-vitro or buy some other process that caused no death or suffering to a sentient beast, it is still NOT kosher for a vegetarian? So is it the biochemical nature of the animal protein that is offensive to vegetarians, or the fact that an animal was sacrificed? Or both? Please be patient with my sophomoric questions as I try to get up to speed in my vegetarian quest. Thanks, Kevin ********** , Gina <webdyke> wrote: > Well....technically it would still be meat, since, well, you had to get the > cells from somewhere... > > Just so you know, I'm a biochemist... > > Gina Quote
Guest guest Posted September 18, 2004 Report Posted September 18, 2004 In the native belief system, everything has a spirit. I personally could not eat a part of an animal that was made through in vitro, this is just merely another show of greed, the need to create a piece of animal with spirit in the disguise of not being alive to justify to ones self the " need " to eat meat. It is the same to me as using the excuse that it is unhealthy to not eat meat. Merely a quick and easy thing to believe just to make ones concience remain quiet. --- " feline_rancher " <feline_rancher wrote: Thanks Gina. I'm a budding [pun intended] horticulturist. Jointly conducting a plant tissue culture workshop this weekend at the local college. Okay on the meat question. I don't mean to be too verbose on this topic, I am just trying to nail down my understanding of vegetarianism. So, even if the meat could be produced in-vitro or buy some other process that caused no death or suffering to a sentient beast, it is still NOT kosher for a vegetarian? So is it the biochemical nature of the animal protein that is offensive to vegetarians, or the fact that an animal was sacrificed? Or both? Please be patient with my sophomoric questions as I try to get up to speed in my vegetarian quest. Thanks, Kevin ********** , Gina <webdyke> wrote: > Well....technically it would still be meat, since, well, you had to get the > cells from somewhere... > > Just so you know, I'm a biochemist... > > Gina Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.