Guest guest Posted May 3, 2007 Report Posted May 3, 2007 All, This thread came and went while I was working on an article titled " Codex is Coming? " If anyone is still interested, it is located here: http://www.paradigm-pubs.com/blog Bob Felt Quote
Guest guest Posted May 5, 2007 Report Posted May 5, 2007 Dear Bob, Thank you for your informative analysis of codex. I would like to apologize for my use of the word " jargon " . I should have realized the negative connotation of the word. However, I meant to indicate the actual definition which is (according to encarta) - " language or terminology used by a particular group, profession, or culture especially when the words and phrases are not understood by other people. " Terminology would have been a better choice of words. Having said that, I still stand by my advice to the TCM profession as a whole regarding the need to educate the public and government entities as to what TCM is and is not. I will grant that there are risks involved in this. The general attitude among the TCM community in the past seems to have been one of, " keep a low profile " . Perhaps this is best when dealing with great powers of regulation, however I cannot help but wonder if we (and our patients) might not be better served by a slightly more pro-active approach regarding the protection of our rights. I applaud your observation of the general political climate in this country and concur.... hence my concern. Having (like many if not most practitioners) pre-occupations with my practice, I admit to being somewhat lax in staying abreast of these sorts of issues. Once informed of the draft guidance issue, and upon reading it, I certainly did become " alarmed " or even (to put it in the vernacular) " freaked out " by what certainly appears to be clear language that could lay the groundwork for future regulations that could have a negative impact on the practice of TCM, particularly the use of herbs. I am reasonably reassured that the draft guidance and codex issue may not be an emergency, however I am not so reassured regarding the FDA proposal on GMP for dietary supplements brought to this forum's attention by David Kailin (digest # 3537). This proposal, if implemented, could have a serious impact on the ability to practice " Traditional " Chinese herbal medicine. I would be very much interested in your assessment of this proposal. I have not had time to read Sen. Kennedy's bill, but I will endeavor to do so. I'm sure I will be utterly " alarmed " by it;) I would like to thank all (especially our patient and hardworking moderator) again for their response to these issues. I would also like to ask Dr. Kailin if he might provide a bit more information on how to respond to the OMB regarding the GMP proposal. Regards, dr.w Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.