Guest guest Posted April 9, 2007 Report Posted April 9, 2007 it seems that the only way to avoid posting all the previous material is to hit the " reply via web post " button and delete unnecessary material. is that correct? or is there a more direct way. I receive posts via daily diary, I don't know if that makes a difference. thanks, Phil , " " wrote: > > I want to again tell people this little thing about editing your > posts. A CHA member emailed me seperately about it. It's kind of akin > to littering. > doug > > long signatures or signatures with images take Quote
Guest guest Posted April 9, 2007 Report Posted April 9, 2007 No. You can do either a straight reply (from your mail program) OR a reply via web post. Either way, delete the extraneous material. This is especially important if you to a digest. Otherwise, the reply will include the text of up to 25 posts. thanks. -------------- Original message ---------------------- " philcusick " <pkcusick > it seems that the only way to avoid posting all the previous material is to hit > the " reply via > web post " button and delete unnecessary material. > > is that correct? or is there a more direct way. > > I receive posts via daily diary, I don't know if that makes a difference. > > thanks, Phil Quote
Guest guest Posted April 9, 2007 Report Posted April 9, 2007 I simply hit " rpely. " Then, in the message space, I block and then delete everything else people have failed to delete previously. Very simple, no problem. Bob Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.