wiseman standards

[Guest guest]

, " "

<@c...> wrote:

I have further looked up 4 other herbs (in Chinese) that Bensky

> says treats spermatorrhea (yijing) and guess what, the Chinese also

only use

> yijing and NO other 'type' of seminal emission. There is no huajing or

> anything else that you claim. They just use 1 term - yijing! Bensky

is not

> lumping anything, he is just representing exactly what the Chinese say.

> Bensky does not need a term for huajing because the Chinese aren't even

> using it in their (mainstream) MM's.

 

That is completely BS. I have spent the last year and a half reading

9 different Materia Medicas in Chinese, and they ALL use hua jing and

yi jing on a regular basis.

 

I have done far more researching than I

> should have when you came to the table with nothing but talk and no

> references...

 

Whatever.

 

Eric

[Guest guest]

>

>

> On Behalf Of Eric Brand

> Saturday, July 16, 2005 9:16 PM

>

> Re: wiseman standards

>

> , " "

> <@c...> wrote:

> I have further looked up 4 other herbs (in Chinese) that Bensky

> > says treats spermatorrhea (yijing) and guess what, the Chinese also

> only use

> > yijing and NO other 'type' of seminal emission. There is no huajing or

> > anything else that you claim. They just use 1 term - yijing! Bensky

> is not

> > lumping anything, he is just representing exactly what the Chinese say.

> > Bensky does not need a term for huajing because the Chinese aren't even

> > using it in their (mainstream) MM's.

>

> That is completely BS. I have spent the last year and a half reading

> 9 different Materia Medicas in Chinese, and they ALL use hua jing and

> yi jing on a regular basis.

>

 

Then present it...

 

-Jason

 

 

> I have done far more researching than I

> > should have when you came to the table with nothing but talk and no

> > references...

>

> Whatever.

>

> Eric

>

>

>

>

> Chinese Herbal Medicine offers various professional services, including

> board approved continuing education classes, an annual conference and a

> free discussion forum in Chinese Herbal Medicine.

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Side note to the side note:

 

The California state board (or whatever replaces it) has just adapted

the Practical Dictionary as a required source text for the state boards.

 

 

On Jul 16, 2005, at 6:54 AM, wrote:

 

> Side note:

>

> There must be something to this style because fundamentals

> (wiseman) has

> been around for 15 years(?) But still schools and the National

> board list

> don't seem to adopt this book, I wonder why? I think it is because

> it is

> hard to read and extract information for reasons that you can

> decide upon.

> But other books that came along later have been added in Deadman, even

> Deng's Practical DX (Wismenese - The only one I think). Maciocia

> still

> reigns supreme (for better or worse) - I guess we have been through

> this

> before, but I just see it as a testament to communicating CM

> effectively and

> there is not just 1 way... One sacrifices something on either end

> of the

> stick, but hey what about the middle road...

 

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

>

>

> On Behalf Of

> Saturday, July 16, 2005 9:55 PM

>

> Re: wiseman standards

>

> Side note to the side note:

>

> The California state board (or whatever replaces it) has just adapted

> the Practical Dictionary as a required source text for the state boards.

>

>

 

Good to hear..

 

-Jason

 

 

> On Jul 16, 2005, at 6:54 AM, wrote:

>

> > Side note:

> >

> > There must be something to this style because fundamentals

> > (wiseman) has

> > been around for 15 years(?) But still schools and the National

> > board list

> > don't seem to adopt this book, I wonder why? I think it is because

> > it is

> > hard to read and extract information for reasons that you can

> > decide upon.

> > But other books that came along later have been added in Deadman, even

> > Deng's Practical DX (Wismenese - The only one I think). Maciocia

> > still

> > reigns supreme (for better or worse) - I guess we have been through

> > this

> > before, but I just see it as a testament to communicating CM

> > effectively and

> > there is not just 1 way... One sacrifices something on either end

> > of the

> > stick, but hey what about the middle road...

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Despite my issues with it, I think this is great as it will definetely " up the

ante " as to the

level of TCM taught in the California schools. We see now students getting bored

with the

current TCM texts very quickly.

doug

 

 

> > On Behalf Of

> > Saturday, July 16, 2005 9:55 PM

> >

> > Re: wiseman standards

> >

> > Side note to the side note:

> >

> > The California state board (or whatever replaces it) has just adapted

> > the Practical Dictionary as a required source text for the state boards.

> >

> >

>

> Good to hear..

>

> -Jason

>

[Guest guest]

I think this attitude is fine, as long as it is not an excuse for

being lazy, and not bothering to resolve real confusion and

misunderstanding where it exists because one can't be bothered to

carefully sort through the issues.

 

-Li

 

, " Jimmy Symmonds MRCVS

(Healthy Beast) " <jimmy.symmonds@h...> wrote:

> The name that can be named is not The Name - tao te ching

> All terms limit our knowing - it is perhaps more fun to be curious as to

> what is being pointed to by any particular term. As soon as we

understand

> its meaning, we can drop the term and its definition. Why hold on to

it? The

> words have served their purpose.

> There is no conflict.

> Jimmy