Guest guest Posted September 24, 2008 Report Share Posted September 24, 2008 >Dead rats don’t lie, says sweetener critic > >“Dead rats don’t lie,” says food safety >campaigner, Chris Wheeler, over the controversy >surrounding the artificial sweetener, aspartame, >used widely in pharmaceuticals and diet >products. “Before the so-called ‘scientist’ >critics supporting sweetener safety get too >carried away condemning the Italian rat studies >demonstrating aspartame’s cancer-causing >characteristics, on the basis that they never >got to meet the rats, the public needs to know just who’s kidding who. > >Dr Magnuson, a recent corporate-sponsored >visitor, and her ilk, are happy to use rat >studies as a gold standard to ‘prove’ chemical >food additive safety – when it suits them – but >when a comprehensive series of studies come out >from a prestigious, non-industry aligned >research institute like Italy’s Ramazzini >Institute showing dangers in aspartame, then >these food industry apologists quibble over >whether the rats used in the study were >sufficiently upper class or went to the right school. > >“Dr. Soffritti, the award-winning scientist >heading the Italian rat studies on aspartame’s >cancer-causing potential, used the same breed of >rats used widely by the food industry itself to >test for toxicity. The fact that Coca Cola and >Wrigley’s and the rest of the powerful >international corporates backing aspartame don’t >like facing is that the Ramazzini Institute’s >rats died from cancer in unusually large numbers >when fed steady diets including aspartame, >within the human daily intake range. > >“Dead rats don’t lie. The rats died because they >ate aspartame. Unlike Dr Magnuson and Professor >John Birkbeck of Massey University – who, we >would note in passing is the former head of the >industry-supported NZ Nutrition Foundation – the >rats at no stage in their short careers ever >received funding, directly or indirectly, from >Coca Cola, Wrigley’s or any other of the >international corporates using aspartame in >their products. The sacrifice these rats made in >the cause of human health should not be ignored. > >“Producing carpetbag scientists out of the >woodwork to defend unnecessary chemical >additions to the diet is a sort of crude >witchdoctor ritual used by the food and beverage >industry to trick us natives down in the street >into believing junk food is manna from heaven. >This cargo cult type of argument needs to be >seen in its true light. The fact is pretty-well >95 percent of the chemicals added by industry to >our daily diet have nothing to do with human >health or nutrition. They are simply put there >to make rubbish “food” and junk beverages last >forever and make it possible for human beings to >consume them without vomiting. > >All the best science, coming from independent >scientists not paid by the food industry, >demonstrates hazards from nerve and muscle >damage to cancer and significant eye damage from >using diet preparations including aspartame. > >New Zealand’s Abby Cormack isn’t the only victim >of aspartame by a long shot. The problem is that >our medical profession have bought into the NZ >Food Safety Authority’s specious arguments that >aspartame is safe, based on industry data and >the fact that the international regulatory scene >from the US FDA to the United Nation’s Codex >Alimentarius is stacked with regulatory >scientists who owe their main sources of income >to the additive-supplying industries they >regulate. These days there’s no such thing as an >‘independent’ food regulator. NZ doctors simply >fail to factor aspartame in as a possible cause >of the weird symptoms they are increasingly >seeing pass through their consulting rooms. They >need to access the more than 200 independent >studies in the international medical press >suggesting significant health problems with aspartame product use. > >Unfortunately, the average New Zealand food >scientist, toxicologist, dietician or >nutritionist (sic) owes their professional >career to keeping a favourable profile with >major international corporations like Coca Cola. >To imagine that a New Zealand professional in >the human dietary field is going to come out >with significant criticisms of an identified >nerve toxin like the synthetic sweetener, >aspartame, is like expecting Fonterra to >properly police a Chinese subsidiary whose >language and culture they clearly don’t understand. > >New Zealanders are babes in the wood in the >hands of major international corporates and the >games they play over food safety. It’s >indicative of the problems the New Zealand >public have in believing or trusting our own >food regulators, when you realise that the only >data the regulators ever examine comes from the >very industries our regulators are supposed to >be policing. Under those circumstances it’s a >case of the same problem the computer industry >has always acknowledged – if the incoming data >is garbage, then the outgoing data will also be >garbage. What we have seen with Coca Cola’s >recent defence of its use of aspartame in its >diet products is the manner in which so-called >“science” can be misused to defend the indefensible. > >“The fact is, minority organisations like our >own NZ Safe Food Campaign simply don’t have the >resources to defend the NZ public against the >consequences of junk science. What we need is a >food safety regulatory environment where the >public interest is the first priority and not >the defence of powerful international food corporate interests. > >“Fonterra’s contaminated milk scandal should be >a wake-up call to us all over how easily food >corporate interests take priority over public safety.” > > >NOTE: >Chris Wheeler is the Auckland representative of >the NZ Safe Food Campaign and former president >of the Soil & Health Association of NZ Inc, New >Zealand’s oldest lobbying group over health and food safety issues. > >CONTACT DETAILS: >Chris Wheeler, Mob: 021 110 9525, H/W: (09) 440 >9442, Email: <chrisw2. > >-- > >Chris Wheeler >P O Box 44, Upper Moutere >Nelson 7144 >NEW ZEALAND >Tel: 021 110 9525 >Website: <www.selfhelp-cancertherapy.com> > > > " God is not on the side of the heavy battalions, >but of the best shots. " Voltaire, 1694 - 1778, The Piccini Notebooks > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.