Guest guest Posted June 11, 2007 Report Share Posted June 11, 2007 Hi all, As I answer this, it looks as if, either I or you, are in a parallel universe. What are you talking about? 5 element and TCM? It's all TCM. 5 elements, is just another tool in our toolbox to differential-diagnose the patient. Emotion, and spirit, and whatever else, what? If you read the Classics, Five phase cosmic correspondence, five elements, five phase correspondence in human activity, five phase medical correspondence, etc., are all the things that are part of a person and that you are to take into account when you look at the patient. But all of those things are an add-on and part of signs and symptoms. There's no emotionally based, nor spiritually based acupuncture separate from what acupuncture is. There's no " emotion " in acupuncture, the Chinese look at it the same way as they look at Jing or Essence. It's part of The Field. When we do acupuncture, we are influencing The Field (notice that The Field is in capitals) Using herbs to treat the patient, we then are thinking in Zang-Fu terms and we thus treat the Western organs. Acupuncture treats the Qi, The Field, and 5 elements is but a part of it. Lab work, X-rays, CT scans, emotions, what a person does for a living, demeanor, inherent characteristic (this would be 5 element) of the patient, are all tools we have and we're supposed to use to make as acurate a diagnosis as we possibly can. Maybe I'm in the twighlight zone, but I never - before now, heard of a separation between TCM and 5 element, given that 5 element is but one tool amongst many. In my school 5 element is just another lecture. Whatever! This is such nonsense! Gloria Hi Trish, I very much agree with Z'ev and find the split the 5 element school STILL makes between the physical and spiritual disheartening. Addressing the emotions and the spirit is inherent in any tradition that is able to assist in bringing organic balance to a dynamic gone awry. It is so integral to Chinese medicine that it does not need to be separated out as an emphasis as is done in the 5E tradition. I am, like Z'ev amazed that this tendency of the 5E tradition to split the emotions and spirit off from the body persists. An ability to use the messages of the body to come to a diagnosis does not mean that the emotions or spirit are not taken in as well - as causes of illness or as effects of physical imbalance. Certainly, an ability to hear the messages of physical and emotional signs and symptoms as we do in Classical Chinese medicine and to use these messages to guide treatment has helped many patients with psychological disorders as well as helping many patients feel more " right " within and as themselves. A practitioner does not have to use emotional and spiritual language at every turn in order for the medicine to have the depth to work on those levels. I would warn against being seduced by spiritual language as being the hallmark of a spiritual medicine. I am certain that the graduate you spoke to was simply giving you the 5E party line that she/he had learned in school and really does not begin to understand anything about the depth and breathe of Chinese medicine. If that is still the party line in these 5E schools, how ignorant and closed they are! I hope it is not still true across the board. I would suggest not just talking to recent graduates who notoriously, in any tradition, have a bit of the born-again perspective and have not been tempered by real life practice. I know many 5E practitioners in the area I live in who have been very disappointed in their ability to integrate body, emotions and spirit. These practitioners have radically moved their practices to acupuncture styles that see the body as an expression of spirit and honor it's messages (as opposed to just looking for subtle and subjective messages of spirit only and diminishing the body's ability to speak). Many of these practitioners have complained that the diagnostic methods of 5E are so subjective as to create a real lack of confidence in diagnosis. It is common that a patient will be diagnosed by various 5 E practitioners and each with see a different CF. As Z'ev points out, the tradition we link to when we begin our journey in traditional or classical Chinese medicine is very rich and very diverse. One benefit of TCM is that, though in most schools, your initial education will seem rather dry it opens the door to a lifetime of study and deepening. When you really start learning and integrating the classical roots, the beauty and effectiveness is rather astounding. In addition you will be connected to a vast lineage of predecessors. I know from talking to my 5E colleagues here that the 5E tradition promotes more of an insular community - that you either practice the tradition as it is and belong to the community OR you jump ship. So, in spite of the possible limitations of your initial TCM education, you set sail into an ocean of teachers, texts, predecessors etc that will continue to inspire and teach you for your whole career. When I view 5E acupuncture as a thread of a vast tradition, rather than as claiming to be the best or deepest or most spirit oriented, I can find what it offers of value. My 5E collegues who have " jumped ship " have also been able to find more value in the 5E tradition when they have integrated it into the ocean of teachings we come from. I also know a 5E practitioner (there are a lot in my area) who has stayed rather more orthodox and loved it and been successful yet has not remained critical of Classical or traditional Chinese medicine. The misunderstanding your recent graduate expresses does not shine the best light on the 5E tradition. Good luck with your decisions! Sharon I am looking at a school in Florida (Academy for Five Element Acupuncture) and was talking with a graduate yesterday about 5E. The graduate said it is very different from TCM in that TCM is based on the 8 principles and is symptom-based to treat physical complaints. That it was created to treat many people quickly in a standardized manner and omits spirituality. In contrast, 5E is based on the 5 elements, does not have protocols (except for some clearing protocols at the beginning of treatment), and does not separate physical symptoms from the emotional. This school is seeking CA-approval and it would have been granted except they are moving to another city this summer. Once settled, the site visits will take place. So it seems that some TCM must be taught in order to be CA-approved. Is 5E very different from TCM? Trish Sharon Weizenbaum 86 Henry Street Amherst, MA 01002 413-549-4021 sweiz www.whitepinehealingarts.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 12, 2007 Report Share Posted June 12, 2007 Greg, Trish, et al: I have tried to hold my tongue and pulse on this discussion. This is just informative , I hope, and not confrontative. > While I'm no expert, what I gather is that the modern 5E phenomenon in > the West is a transmission from Worsley, but I have no idea where he > received this Anne: In the Footsteps of the Yellow Emperor by Peter Eckman is a good source for where Worsley got his ideas. Also Lonnie Jarret, " The Clinical Practice of . " has a lot of Worsley 's Five E protocols. .. I recently spoke with one of his early students, who is > now a very famous and respected practitioner in the West but who I > shall not name, and he said that Worsley was very reluctant to reveal > his sources, and this person felt that Worsley may have been guilty of > a lot of MSU (making stuff up). Anne: He was very effective. There was a study done in the TAI clinic years ago, that showed a very high level of patient satisfaction. Again, what works is what is important. I have to say what is taught at TAI, my 5E school, is based on the 5 Phases. Even TAI is only basing their teachings on what Worsley taught the earlier practitioners. It has been extremely effective and changed many people's lives. I personally bring in 8 principles, Dr. Tan, Cuppling, GuSha, herbs, Chakra Energy healing (which can remove pain on the spot.) The teacher I learned this from was interpreting the ancients also. In all of this I always have the 5E CF in mind and use it in the treatment. > Regardless of all this and getting back to the original post about > schools. Trish, I say attend whatever school looks good to you Anne: I would add, sit in on classes and talk to students from different schools. You will know what feels right to you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.