Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org
Sign in to follow this  
Guest guest

CO-CURE:ACT,NOT:Another Inconvenient Truth - CFLs and CFS, FMS, Lyme, Migraines

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

EcoLEDs use far less electricity than CFLs, have no Mercury, and are

supposedly much safer for human health. The big drawback is cost.

They are much more expensive than I can afford.

 

* Regular light bulbs are intentionally designed to burn out so that

customers are forced to keep buying new ones. They contribute to

substantial landfill problems.

 

* Compact fluorescent lights contain toxic mercury which leaks into

local environment, poisoning rivers, streams, oceans and croplands.

 

* EcoLED lights contain NO mercury and last 50,000 hours. Using LED

lights greatly reduces landfill and the load on the environment.

 

http://www.ecoleds.com/Index.html

 

Alobar

 

On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 2:18 AM, <bestsurprise2002 wrote:

>    Thu, 10 Sep 2009 20:30:30  -0400

>     " uncmom59 [via Co-Cure Moderators

> <co-cure-mod] "  <auntiem6

> ACT,NOT:Another Inconvenient Truth - CFLs  and CFS, FMS, Lyme,

> Migraines

>

> I am forwarding information on the new disability-related CFL  fluorescent

> lighting web site: _http://www.cflimpact.com/_ (http://www.cflimpact.com/) .

>  I have been  contacted by numerous persons with CFS/ME, MCS, FMS, GWI,

> TBI,  etc. that are having adverse health reactions while in this  lighting.

> Some may find the information that Jerry, I and others  cross-disability have

> been gathering to be educational.

>

> It is up and running with videos, news stories, research and  technical

> papers all in a user-friendly format, literally loaded with  information. Many

> people with various disabilities and medical conditions will  find this to

> be very helpful. CFS/Myalgic Encephalopathy and Fibromyalgia are  mentioned.

>

> TBI frontal lobe disabled engineer, Jerry Straub has  collaborated on

> gathering CFL information from persons in the US, England, and  Australia

since

> Christmas before last. This was when the incandescent lighting  ban was

> announced (Energy Act of 2007), and he and I spoke out of desperation of

 being

> left " in the dark " . Jerry's presentation is loss of his ability to walk,

> which he regained after post-accident neuro-optometric rehabilitation. He

falls

>  when CFLs are present, risking reinjury of his previously broken back. My

> presentation in the lights is right and left temporal lobe complex partial

> epilepsy triggered after onset of CFS/ME/MCS/FMS, driven by the flicker

> rate in  florescents, strobe lights, emergency vehicles, CRT computer

> monitors?with low  refresh rates, etc. This website is Jerry's gift to the

disability

>  community.  His news story is on the website.

>

> I believe that it is also a call to action. Persons whose  disabilities are

> adversely affected by fluorescents are asked to contact their  federal

> Congressional representatives, _www.whitehouse.gov_

(http://www.whitehouse.gov)

> , local and national media, and support groups. You may provide the  website

> link to information, and possibly a request for disability accommodation

> by amendment to the Energy Act ban on incandescent lighting. It would also be

>  helpful to contact the ACCESS Board, who promulgate disability barrier

> regulations, to develop a specific lighting disability access guideline. None

> yet exists for this barrier to a large group of persons with photosensitive

>  disabilities.

>

> It could also be helpful to send an email  accommodation request to:

> * The Department of Justice, Civil Rights,  Disability Rights Section to

> give them awareness regarding this potential ADA  civil rights inaccessibility

> issue.

> * The Dept. of Energy

> * Energy  Subcommittee

> * The EPA

>

> Jerry has a copy of EPA's lack of action to Senator Carl  Levin's request

> on behalf of Jerry to address the disability barrier problem  presented by

> CFLs. The research is on the site, along with 30 some years of  research on

> Critical Flicker Frequency from brain trauma, ie. tumor, traumatic  brain

> injury, and acquired brain injury. The latter, in my lay opinion, could

> conceivably fit the CFS/ME, neurotoxin, neuroimmune or neuroborreliosis models

> that present with symptoms of brain injury including autonomic nervous system

> dysfunction.

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...