Fluoride's Impact on Brain - Focus of Two Conferences

[Guest guest]

For many years I ignored all pamphlets which claimed that

fluoridating water was a plot to make people more docile and

controllable. Especially when such claims were linked to " the Red

Menace " being handed out by right wing nutjobs. However, the more I

read about Fluoride, the more dangerous it appears to be. The only

claim of danger which I am unable to verify is that of mind control.

 

I sure cannot vouch for those claims. However, it does seem

to me that they should be examined and studied further to see if the

claim can be debunked or verified.

 

I do wish the website cited below had footnotes and references

to the " many studies " it talks about. No idea if this is sloppy

scholarship, or claims made without substantiation.

 

Alobar

 

On 8/5/08, bestsurprise2002 <bestsurprise2002 wrote:

>

> How can collateral damage such as " impairments to the liver, kidney, brain,

> bones, pineal gland, thyroid, and even teeth* trump the paltry, if not

> outright questionable, benefits to teeth be considered a health benefit?

> " Careful, bonafide laboratory experimentation by conscientious, patriotic

> research chemists, and actual medical experience, have both revealed that

> instead of preserving or promoting 'dental health,' fluoridated drinking

> water*destroys teeth, before adulthood and after, by the destructive mottling

and

> other pathological conditions it actually causes in them, and also creates

many

> other very grave pathological conditions in the internal organisms of bodies

> consuming it. How can it be called a " health " plan? What's behind it?

> That any so-called " doctors " would persuade a civilized nation to add

> voluntarily a deadly poison to its drinking water systems is unbelievable.

It is

> the height of criminal insanity. "

> Extracted from: _FLUORIDE STUPIDITY & POPULATION CONTROL _

> (http://www.preferrednetwork.com/FLUORIDE_STUPIDITY.htm)

> Why is the damage from fluoride and its co contaminants so harshly and

> recklessly being ignored and covered up over the real threat to the people

they

> are supposed to protect?

> Chris Gupta

> _http://tinyurl.com/6xh4he_ (http://tinyurl.com/6xh4he)

[Guest guest]

Alobar,

 

The extremely high amount of fluoride suggested in the Codex alimentarius

agenda should ring all alarm bells, even if one can't " verify " that mind

control is the reason behind this plan.

 

Rima Laibow mentions in her talk about Codex that fluoride is the only

substance that doesn't have to undergo safety tests.

*Nutricide* - Criminalizing Natural Health, Vitamins, and

*...*<http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5266884912495233634>

*Nutricide* - Criminalizing Natural Health, Vitamins, and Herbs *...*

40 min -

 

[image: Rated 4.6 out of 5.0]

 

 

video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5266884912495233634

 

" The Codex Alimentarius, Latin for Food Code, is a very misunderstood

organization that most people have never heard of. According to the official

Codex website, the purpose of this commission is in " protecting health of

the consumers and ensuring fair trade practices in the food trade, and

promoting coordination of all food standards work undertaken by

international governmental and non-governmental organizations " .

 

The history of Codex began in 1893 when the Austria-Hungarian empire decided

it needed a specific set of guidelines by which the courts could rule on

cases dealing with food. The UN met in 1962 and decided that Codex should be

re-implemented worldwide in order to protect health of the consumers. But

since 2002, the Codex Alimentarius Commission has covertly surrendered its

role as an international public health and consumer protection organization.

Under the helm of big industry, the sole purpose of the new codex is to

increase profits for the global corporate juggernauts.

 

Soon every food and beverage you put into your mouth, including water, will

likely be highly regulated by Codex Alimentarius. These soon-to-be mandatory

standards will apply to every country who are members of the WTO (World

Trade Organization). If countries do not follow these standards, then

enormous trade sanctions will result. Some Codex standards that will take

effect on December 31, 2009:

 

* All nutrients are to be considered toxins/poisons and are to be removed

from all food because Codex prohibits the use of nutrients to " prevent,

treat or cure any condition or disease "

* All food (including organic) is to be irradiated, removing all toxic

nutrients from food (unless eaten locally and raw).

* Nutrients allowed will be limited to a Positive List developed by

Codexwhich will include such beneficial nutrients like

*Fluoride (3.8 mg *daily) developed from environmental waste.

* All nutrients (e.g., CoQ10, Vitamins A, B, C, D, Zinc and Magnesium) that

have any positive health impact on the body will be deemed illegal under

Codex and are to be reduced to amounts negligible to humans' health. You

will not even be able to obtain these anywhere in the world even with a

prescription.

* All advice on nutrition (including written online or journal articles or

oral advice to a friend, family member or anyone) will be illegal.

* Worldwide implementation of unlabeled GMOs into crops, animals, fish and

trees.

 

Population control for money is the easiest way to describe the new Codex.

Degraded, demineralized, pesticide-filled and irradiated foods are the

fastest and most efficient way to cause a profitable surge in malnutrition

and preventable degenerative disease -- for which the most appropriate

course of action is always pharmaceuticals. Big Pharma has been waiting for

this opportunity for years. "

 

http://v.mercola.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=69765

 

On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 3:04 AM, Alobar <Alobar wrote:

 

> For many years I ignored all pamphlets which claimed that

> fluoridating water was a plot to make people more docile and

> controllable. Especially when such claims were linked to " the Red

> Menace " being handed out by right wing nutjobs. However, the more I

> read about Fluoride, the more dangerous it appears to be. The only

> claim of danger which I am unable to verify is that of mind control.

>

> I sure cannot vouch for those claims. However, it does seem

> to me that they should be examined and studied further to see if the

> claim can be debunked or verified.

>

> I do wish the website cited below had footnotes and references

> to the " many studies " it talks about. No idea if this is sloppy

> scholarship, or claims made without substantiation.

>

> Alobar

>

>

> On 8/5/08, bestsurprise2002 <bestsurprise2002%40> <

> bestsurprise2002 <bestsurprise2002%40>> wrote:

> >

> > How can collateral damage such as " impairments to the liver, kidney,

> brain,

> > bones, pineal gland, thyroid, and even teeth* trump the paltry, if not

> > outright questionable, benefits to teeth be considered a health benefit?

> > " Careful, bonafide laboratory experimentation by conscientious, patriotic

> > research chemists, and actual medical experience, have both revealed that

> > instead of preserving or promoting 'dental health,' fluoridated drinking

> > water*destroys teeth, before adulthood and after, by the destructive

> mottling and

> > other pathological conditions it actually causes in them, and also

> creates many

> > other very grave pathological conditions in the internal organisms of

> bodies

> > consuming it. How can it be called a " health " plan? What's behind it?

> > That any so-called " doctors " would persuade a civilized nation to add

> > voluntarily a deadly poison to its drinking water systems is

> unbelievable. It is

> > the height of criminal insanity. "

> > Extracted from: _FLUORIDE STUPIDITY & POPULATION CONTROL _

> > (http://www.preferrednetwork.com/FLUORIDE_STUPIDITY.htm)

> > Why is the damage from fluoride and its co contaminants so harshly and

> > recklessly being ignored and covered up over the real threat to the

> people they

> > are supposed to protect?

> > Chris Gupta

> > _http://tinyurl.com/6xh4he_ (http://tinyurl.com/6xh4he)

>

>