Warning on chemtrails. Unreal!

[Guest guest]

What In The World Are They Spraying?

 

By Michael J. Murphy

 

03 March, 2010

Countercurrents.org

 

What would you say if you were told that airplanes were regularly spraying

toxic aerosols in the skies above every major region of the world? That is

exactly what a group of protestors were claiming outside of the annual

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) meeting that was

held in San Diego from February 18-22. However, inside the convention center

was a different story. The scientists gathered to discuss the " plausibility "

of implementing various Geo-engineering campaigns throughout the world, all

under the guise that the Earth has a man-made global warming problem that

can be solved in-part by spraying aerosol aluminum and other particles into

the sky to block the sun. When these scientists were asked about the

possibility of existing aerosol programs; they stated that no aerosol

spraying programs have been implemented to date. A little confused? Why

would protestors gather outside of a meeting making claims that world-wide

aerosol programs were under way if scientist were only now discussing the

possibility of implementing these programs? Could it be that one of these

groups is being deceived?

 

Mauro Oliveira, the Webmaster of Geoengineeringwatch.org, was one of the

protestors. He claimed that the program for Stratospheric Aerosol

Geo-engineering (SAG), AKA chemtrails, has been well under way around the

world. As a matter of fact, Oliveira stated that witnesses from around the

globe claim that heavy aerosol spraying is occurring almost every day over

just about every city. He went on to explain the difference between a

contrail and a chemtrail. He stated that when a jet airplane flies at a

certain altitude, a visible trail of streaks of condensed water vapor

sometimes form in the wake of the aircraft. This is called a contrail.

Contrails are normal and usually dissipate in a few seconds. They are very

similar to when we breathe in cold weather. According to Oliveira, what

occurs behind a SAG plane spraying aerosols is quite different. What can be

seen is a thick white line also called a chemtrail that lingers in the sky

for several hours. The SAG lines are sprayed into the upper atmosphere and

then spread out forming what then appear to be clouds. The particles from

these aerosols then fall to the ground where they enter our soil and water

and can also be inhaled.

 

Another group of protestors had traveled over 10 hours from a small Shasta

County community in Northern California. They became concerned about SAG

when many from this community began to see dramatic changes not only in the

sky, but also on the ground. Trees were dying, grass was not growing and

many farmers were having difficulty getting any crops to grow on their

farms. The crisis prompted biologists from the community to take action by

testing the soil. The results were shocking. Aluminum, barium and other

elements were found to be up to thousands of times higher than normal

limits. Such high quantities lead to unhealthy PH levels in the soil which

can be deadly to ecological life systems. These shocking results led to

additional testing of Lake Shasta with samples from the Pit River arm

tributary that tested over 4,610 times the maximum contamination level of

aluminum allowed in drinking water in the state of California. Also, peer

reviewed scientific studies conclude that bio-available aluminum, now found

in huge quantities in rain world-wide, is very harmful to flora and thus the

eco-system. Ironically, these are the same substances the scientists are

considering implementing in the various potential " future " aerosol spraying

campaigns that were being discussed at the meeting.

 

A large number of other protesters became interested in SAG after

experiencing burning eyes, migraine headaches, anxiety, irregular heartbeat,

high blood pressure and other health problems on days that airplanes were

allegedly witnessed spraying aerosols in the sky. Deborah Whitman, Founder

and President of the non-profit environmental organization Environmental

Voices and also Producer of the documentary " Sky Lines " is no stranger to

these symptoms. She has been hospitalized over 51 times on what she calls

" heavy spraying days " . Whitman has committed her life to helping people who

claim to be experiencing similar problems resulting from aerosol spraying

and gets calls from all over the U.S. in response to her website and

documentary. Her recommended health tips can be found at

www.environmentalvoices.org. Other indicators that possibly validate the

claim that SAG is connected to health problems are the respiratory mortality

rate, which has risen from eight on the list of mortality to third in the

past five years, and the fact that Alzheimer's and other illnesses linked to

aluminum have continued to rise around the globe at astronomical rates since

the inception of the alleged spraying.

 

The AAAS meeting hosted some of the world's leading geo-engineering

scientists. With years of education and even more experience in their

respected fields, the scientists looked at geo-engineering issues from many

angles. Workshop subjects ranged from, the effectiveness of geo-engineering

to potential problems and even touched upon the issue of ethics. According

to independent reporter Stewart Howe of Los Angeles, all of the scientists

seemed to be looking for solutions to what they believe is the problem of

global warming. Howe stated that the scientists appeared to be carefully

weighing both the pros and cons of SAG when presenting potential campaigns

to address the man-made global warming theory. Many were actually advocating

alternative methods to combat this issue due to the potential risks of SAG

that include droughts, ozone depletion, less solar power, decimated weather

patterns, military use of technology and other various environmental

impacts. Howe said, " after witnessing the aerosol spraying for years, I was

surprised by the discourse among scientists. " Stewart went on to say that he

believes that most of the scientists attending seemed to be separated from

the knowledge of any current SAG deployment. As a matter of fact when asked

about current SAG operations, leading geo-engineering scientist Ken Caldiera

replied that he was unaware of any current aerosol spraying operations and

when prompted to explain the long lingering trails left behind planes, he

stated that they are simply normal contrails from jets.

 

David Keith, another leading scientist and expert in the field of

geo-engineering, discussed the well-funded studies that have been conducted

to predict potential future risks as well as benefits associated with

geo-engineering. Some of the potential benefits include a cooler planet, and

the reduction of melting sea ice and rising sea levels. Keith discussed what

aerosol particles would be most effective in achieving the stated goals of

the SAG program. He went on to say that initially sulfur was considered,

however, aluminum is more effective and can be used by adding ten to twenty

mega-tons per year into the stratosphere. When asked about health related

studies that have been conducted to predict the potential risks of adding

the particles in our air, Keith stated that many studies have been completed

and indicate few risks. However, when asked specifically about the use of

aluminum as an aerosol, he said " we haven't done anything serious on

aluminum, so there could be something terrible that we will find tomorrow

that we haven't looked at. " After the meeting, Keith showed consideration to

the protesters by initiating a discussion about the SAG program outside

where the protestors were standing. When confronted with concerns about SAG

deployment from the group, he went on to say that he shared similar views

and is against any deployment until proper research is completed to

determine potential risks of aerosol spraying. He also went on to say that

he is unaware of any current SAG operations, but, would be willing to look

at any scientific proof if presented to him.

 

As the skies around our world continue to change, there is strong evidence

that points toward current deployment of massive aerosol operations. Could

it be that scientific data and studies are being used to implement

pre-mature full-scale SAG programs with-out the knowledge of the top

scientists who are involved with the research? If so, what kind of ethical

considerations can we expect from the geo-engineering community in the

future? It is hard to believe that the strange white lines in the skies

witnessed around the world and the toxic elements found in the soil, water

and air are from an unrelated source. We the people, in partnership with the

scientific community need to challenge not only the environmental and health

risks associated with SAG but also the numerous world-wide allegations about

current deployment. It is imperative that we become educated and involved in

uncovering the truth of this alleged crime against both nature and humanity.

The future of our planet depends on it. As concerns continue to grow around

the world about this issue, additional information including meet-up groups

can be found on various chemtrail and geo-engineering websites.

 

Michael J. Murphy is a journalist and political activist from the Los

Angeles area whose work focuses on issues that go beyond the interest of the

Corporate mainstream media. Michael's interviews include; Chelene

Nightingale (California Governor candidate), Mark Reed (California

congressional candidate), Bill Hunt (Orange County Sheriff candidate), Jenny

Worman (California congressional candidate), Stewart Rhodes (Oath Keepers,

Founder) and Ed Asner (Actor " Mary Tyler Moore " , " Lou Grant " and " UP " ).

Michael has also made a series of short films that address controversial

political issues. He can be reached at 310.431.8890 or whtagft.

 

 

-

<robert-blau

;

<SymphonicHealth >; <oleander soup >;

<cancercure >; <cancercure2 >;

<cancercured >; <cancer_alternatives >;

<cancervictory >; <gyllenha;

<avmassey; <john_s_david

Tuesday, March 02, 2010 6:06 AM

Frankincense against cancer?

 

 

Some Scientists Believe Frankincense Holds Future Key to Fight Cancer

Teresa Neumann (March 1, 2010)

 

" Working with frankincense could revolutionize the treatment of

cancer...Treatment with frankincense could eradicate the cancerous cells

alone and let the others live. "

 

" Noting that the frankincense given to Jesus after He was born probably

came across the deserts from Oman, the BBC has published an interesting

article detailing the history of the precious fragrance and why

scientists believe it may someday cure cancer.Â

 

Immunologist Mahmoud Suhail, and other scientists, " have observed that

there is some agent within frankincense which stops cancer spreading,

and which induces cancerous cells to close themselves down. " (Photo:

Wikipedia)

 

" Cancer starts when the DNA code within the cell's nucleus becomes

corrupted, " says Suhail. " It seems frankincense has a re-set function.

It can tell the cell what the right DNA code should be. Frankincense

separates the 'brain' of the cancerous cellâ? " the nucleusâ? " from

the 'body'â? " the cytoplasm, and closes down the nucleus to stop it

from reproducing corrupted DNA codes. "

 

According to the report, " Working with frankincense could revolutionize

the treatment of cancer. Currently, with chemotherapy, doctors blast the

area around a tumor to kill the cancer, but that also kills healthy

cells, and weakens the patient. Treatment with frankincense could

eradicate the cancerous cells alone and let the others live. "

 

To read more facts about frankincense and why doctors are excited about

its anti-cancer potential, provided.

Source:Â Jeremy Howell - BBC

___________________

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8505251.stm

 

 

 

---