Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Female and Elder Consumers and Payers Sue Pfizer Over Deceptive Marketing of Lip

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

This is just one of several lawsuits.

Press Release Lipitor Litigation (Pfizer)

http://www.hbsslaw.com/frontend?command=PressRelease &

task=viewPressReleaseDetail & iPressReleaseId=1020

 

Female and Elder Consumers and Payers Sue Pfizer Over Deceptive Marketing of

Lipitor®

 

Plaintiffs allege promotional scheme to boost sales of world’s best-selling

drug by misleading women and seniors about link between the drug and heart

disease

 

September 28, 2005

 

Boston - Consumers today filed the first-of-its-kind nationwide class-action

lawsuit against Pfizer (NYSE: PFE), claiming the world's largest drug company

misled consumers into using its anti-cholesterol drug Lipitor despite the

absence of evidence from clinical trials that these drugs are of any benefit to

large segments of the population.

 

According to Steve Berman, the lead attorney for the proposed class, Pfizer

promoted Lipitor by claiming it prevents heart disease in women and the

elderly, where no clinical test has established such a benefit. In fact,

according to

the complaint, women without heart disease taking Lipitor actually developed

10 percent more heart attacks than women treated with a placebo.

 

The lawsuit alleges that Pfizer engaged in a massive campaign to convince

both doctors and patients that Lipitor is a beneficial treatment for nearly

everyone with elevated cholesterol, even though no studies have shown it to be

effective for women and those over 65 years of age who do not already have heart

disease or diabetes.

 

Normally, drugs become widely used as treatments for patients only when a

well-designed clinical trial finds that the drug is safe and effective for

patients of the same type and age. No such trial has shown that Lipitor helps

the

elderly or females without prior heart disease. " We believe Pfizer intentionally

ignored the scientific evidence - and lack thereof - and launched a

multi-million dollar ad campaign designed to push the drug to anyone they could

convince to buy it, " Berman said. " We intend to prove that Pfizer pocketed

billions

in sales to those who do not benefit from Lipitor. "

 

Lipitor is in the class of cholesterol-lowering drugs called statins and it

is the best-selling drug in the world, with sales in 2004 of more than $10

billion.

 

According to John Abramson MD, clinical instructor of ambulatory care at

Harvard Medical School and author of Overdosed America: The Broken Promise of

American Medicine, the scientific picture is clear.

 

" The idea that lowering cholesterol always reduces the risk of heart disease

has become the conventional wisdom, which drug companies like Pfizer have

taken great pains to promote. But for women under 65 and people over 65 with no

history of heart disease or diabetes, the evidence just isn't there, " Abramson

said. " Millions of women and seniors are spending huge sums to take Lipitor

every day despite a lack of proof that it's doing anything beneficial for them,

and may actually be harming the elderly. "

 

Alex Sugerman-Brozan, director of the Prescription Access Litigation Project,

added, " We believe that the evidence will shine light on the ways that drug

companies like Pfizer work to manipulate most of what we know about

prescription drugs, from the research to the guidelines that doctors follow. "

One of the

organizations suing Pfizer, Health Care For All, is a member of the

Prescription Access Litigation Project.

 

The suit claims that Pfizer's promotional campaign has resulted in billions

of dollars in unnecessary drug spending among these two groups of patients at a

time when drug and general healthcare costs are spiraling out of control.

 

Nancy Yost, one of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit, is a 73-year-old woman with

no history of heart disease who has been taking Lipitor for several years.

" With the high cost of prescription drugs today, no seniors I know can afford to

pay for a drug that doesn't do what it promises, " Ms. Yost said. " I'm

disappointed that Pfizer is spending millions to convince seniors to pay top

dollar

for a drug without full disclosure of its effectiveness. It shows that the drug

industry's priorities are skewed when they spend twice as much on marketing

as they do on research. "

 

Health Care For All noted the high economic cost to taxpayers. " We all pay

the price for the over-prescription of drugs, like Lipitor, because we have to

foot much of the bill for state pharmacy programs for seniors and soon for the

Medicare drug benefit, " said Melissa Shannon, Consumer Health Policy

Coordinator of Health Care For All. " We can't allow drug companies to trick

seniors

into taking expensive, unnecessary drugs that will drive up the already-high

costs that Medicare will be paying for seniors' drugs. "

 

According to the ASCOT study, the largest clinical trial of the effectiveness

of statin therapy in women, there is reason to be concerned. The study of

2000 women at increased risk of developing heart disease found that the women

who

took Lipitor developed 10% more heart attacks than the women who took a

placebo.

 

The proposed class action seeks to represent women who have taken Lipitor and

who have no history of heart disease or diabetes; people aged 65 and over who

have taken Lipitor and who have no history of heart disease or diabetes; and

third-party payers such as insurance companies, union health and welfare

funds, self-insured employers and others, who paid for Lipitor for patients in

either of these two groups.

 

The lawsuit alleges that Pfizer violated state consumer protection laws

against deceptive advertising and seeks reimbursement for women and seniors and

third-party payers who bought Lipitor unnecessarily as a result of Pfizer's

deceptive marketing and promotional campaign. " We intend to prove in this case

that

Pfizer's false advertising created an enormous artificial demand for Lipitor,

much of which would not exist if Pfizer had fully and fairly disclosed the

truth about the drug " said Berman.

 

The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court in Boston, was filed by Steve

Berman, managing partner of Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro, on behalf of several

individuals, Health Care For All, and the Teamsters.

 

For a copy of the complaint or to view the studies cited in the complaint,

visit www.hbsslaw.com

 

About Prescription Access Litigation

Project Prescription Access Litigation Project (PAL)

( www.prescriptionaccess.org ) is a project of Boston-based Community

Catalyst. PAL is a nationwide coalition of over 110 state, local, and national

senior, labor and consumer health advocacy groups in 35 states fighting to make

prescription drugs affordable. Since its launch in 2001, PAL members have filed

23 sets of lawsuits targeting drug industry practices that illegally push the

price of prescription drugs beyond the reach of the American consumer.

 

About Community Catalyst Community Catalyst (www.communitycatalyst.org) is a

Boston-based national advocacy organization that builds consumer and community

participation in the shaping of our health system to ensure quality,

affordable health care for all.

 

About Health Care For All

Health Care For All ( www.hcfama.org ) is a consumer advocacy organization

building a movement of empowered people and organizations with the goal of

creating a health care system that is responsive to the needs of all people,

particularly the most vulnerable. Health Care For All is dedicated to making

quality

health care a right of all people.

 

About Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro

Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro is a law firm with offices in Seattle, Cambridge,

Los Angeles, and Phoenix. The firm has developed a nationally recognized

practice in class-action litigation. The firm is co-lead counsel in litigation

to

recover losses from Enron employees' retirement funds and represented

Washington and 12 other states in lawsuits against the tobacco industry that

resulted

in the largest settlement in the history of litigation. The firm also served

as counsel in several other high-profile cases including the Washington Public

Power Supply litigation, which resulted in a settlement of more than $850

million, and the $92.5 million settlement of The Boeing Company litigation.

Other

notable cases include litigation involving the Exxon Valdez oil spill;

Louisiana Pacific Siding; Morrison Knudsen; Piper Jaffray; Nordstrom; Boston

Chicken;

Noah's Bagels; TAP Pharmaceutical's Lupron litigation; and SmithKline

Beecham's Paxil Litigation.

 

 

HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP | Attorneys at Law

206-623-7292 | www.hbsslaw.com Media Contact: Mark Firmani | 206-443-9357 |

mark

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...