Critics say fragmented inspection system can’t ensure U.S. food is safe

[Guest guest]

Ag News

 

Critics say fragmented inspection system can’t ensure U.S. food is safe

By JOSH FUNK, Associated Press Writer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OMAHA, Neb. — Peanut butter is regulated by the Food and Drug Administration. But chicken pot pies are the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s responsibility. Frozen cheese pizzas — FDA. But if there’s pepperoni on them, USDA has jurisdiction, too.Critics of the nation’s food safety system say that it is too fragmented and marked by overlapping authority, and they say that may help explain why dangerous foods keep slipping through and why contamination scares are handled in sometimes inconsistent ways.

 

 

 

 

 

“One of the underlying problems is the bifurcation of the regulatory system,” said Caroline Smith DeWaal, director of the Center for Science in the Public Interest’s food safety division.Critics also complain that the food safety system suffers from a shortage of money and inspectors and inadequate enforcement powers.In the months ahead, Congress will consider several proposals to reform the system, including creation of a single food safety agency, an idea both the FDA and USDA oppose. A top FDA official said the agencies cooperate well now.“We do not believe a single food safety agency would give us the efficiencies you can have from having two agencies responsible for 99 percent of the food that we eat in this country, both domestic and imported,” said Richard Raymond, USDA undersecretary for food safety.

 

 

 

 

 

The government structure that protects the food supply took shape piecemeal over the past 101 years. The results could be seen in the way two recalls were handled over the past year.When Peter Pan peanut butter was linked to a salmonella outbreak in February, ConAgra Foods Inc. recalled it as soon as federal health officials raised questions. But when ConAgra’s Banquet-brand chicken and turkey pot pies were tied to a similar salmonella outbreak in October, the Omaha company waited two days to recall them, first issuing only a consumer health warning.Peanut butter is regulated by the FDA, while pot pies are regulated by the USDA, because USDA has long had authority over meat and poultry.Ready-to-eat foods like peanut butter, which is eaten right out of the jar, receive closer scrutiny because there is greater danger if harmful bacteria are present in those foods. Products like pot pies must be cooked first, and proper cooking kills most bacteria.According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the pot pies sickened more than 270 people, the peanut butter at least 625.Neither the FDA nor the USDA had the authority to order ConAgra to recall the products. In fact, all food recalls, except for those involving infant formula, are voluntary. Often, the government gets a product recalled by warning the company it could face bad publicity if it does not withdraw the food.An advisory committee created in response to concerns about recalls of imported products — including dog food and toothpaste — will suggest changing that.The commission, created in July in response to concerns about recalls of imported items, will recommend to President Bush that the FDA be empowered to order recalls of products deemed a risk to consumers, an administration official said Monday. Congress would have to approve such a step.The official, speaking condition of anonymity because the recommendations have not been publicly released, said Bush will receive the recommendations Tuesday.At least a dozen federal agencies share responsibility for keeping America’s food safe, with the FDA and the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service playing the biggest roles. But none of the agencies use the same rule book.The USDA and FDA sometimes must inspect the same food plant. For instance, the USDA inspects plants where frozen pepperoni pizza is made, because of the meat topping. But the FDA is responsible for inspecting plants that make frozen cheese pizzas.In the two ConAgra contamination cases, it turns out that an FDA inspector hadn’t been to the company’s peanut butter plant in Georgia for two years before the recall, while a USDA inspector visits the Missouri pot pie plant daily.The Center for Science in the Public Interest’s DeWaal said the FDA cannot ensure a safe food supply. “The FDA’s current domestic inspection program is a joke,” she said.Federal regulators and the food industry say the food safety system needs to be adjusted, not overhauled.America’s food is “really remarkably safe,” said David Acheson, the FDA’s top food safety official.A recent report by the Government Accountability Office, the investigative arm of Congress, noted that about 61 percent of the $1.7 billion the federal government spends on food safety went to the Agriculture Department in 2003, which is responsible for regulating about 20 percent of the food supply.The FDA, which is responsible for most of the remaining 80 percent, gets only about 29 percent of the total.“FDA’s food program is very small compared to its task,” said William Hubbard, a top FDA official for 14 years who now pushes for stiffer food safety regulations and more resources for his former employer.In addition to making daily visual checks of all meat processing operations, the USDA tests between 10,000 and 12,000 samples of ground beef each year for E. coli contamination.But this year, more than 30 million pounds of ground beef — enough to make 120 million quarter-pound burgers — has been pulled off the market in 18 recalls because of possible E. coli contamination. That included the second-largest recall in U.S. history, which put Topps Meat Co. out of business. The most recent ground beef recall, involving Cargill Inc., took place over the weekend.At least 65 sicknesses but no deaths have been linked to this year’s ground beef recalls. In 2006, there were just eight beef recalls and no reported illnesses.“What we have seen this summer is obviously a wake-up call,” said Richard Raymond, USDA undersecretary for food safety. USDA officials are trying to determine why they are seeing more E. coli.The CDC tracks food-borne illnesses in 10 states as a barometer for the nation, and found that the rate of confirmed food-borne illness cases fell about 28 percent from 1996 to 2006, when there were 38.4 cases per 100,000 people.The CDC estimates 76 million of the roughly 300 million people who live in the United States get sick each year. More than 300,000 of those are hospitalized, and about 5,000 people die from food-borne illnesses each year.“I think the food industry has a very long history of not doing anything on food safety unless it has to,” said Marion Nestle, a New York University professor who wrote a book on the subject.Associated Press White House Correspondent Terence Hunt contributed to this report.On the Net:FDA: www.fda.govUSDA Food Safety and Inspection Service: www.fsis.usda.govCenters for Disease Control and Prevention: www.cdc.govCenter for Science in the Public Interest outbreak database: www.cspinet.org/foodsafety/outbreakGrocery Manufacturers’ Association: http://www.gmabrands.com

[Guest guest]

I'm more worried about the food coming from China primarily---where soon the majority of our food will be coming from if it isnt already---where there is practically no regulation...Kathy <vanokat wrote: Ag News Critics say fragmented inspection system can’t ensure U.S. food is safe By JOSH FUNK, Associated Press Writer OMAHA, Neb. — Peanut butter is regulated by the Food and Drug Administration. But chicken pot pies are the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s responsibility. Frozen cheese pizzas — FDA. But if there’s pepperoni on them, USDA has jurisdiction, too.Critics of the nation’s food safety system say that it is too fragmented and marked by overlapping authority, and they say that may help explain why dangerous foods keep slipping through and why contamination scares are handled in sometimes inconsistent ways. “One of the underlying problems is the bifurcation of the regulatory system,” said Caroline Smith DeWaal, director of the Center for Science in the Public Interest’s food safety division.Critics also complain that the food safety system suffers from a shortage of money and inspectors and inadequate enforcement powers.In the months ahead, Congress will consider several proposals to reform the system, including creation of a single food safety agency, an idea both the FDA and USDA oppose. A top FDA official said the agencies cooperate well now.“We do not believe a single food safety agency would give us the efficiencies you can have from having two agencies responsible for 99 percent of the food that we eat in this country, both domestic and imported,” said Richard Raymond, USDA undersecretary for food safety. The government structure that protects the food supply took shape piecemeal over the past 101 years. The results could be seen in the way two recalls were handled over the past year.When Peter Pan peanut butter was linked to a salmonella outbreak in February, ConAgra Foods Inc. recalled it as soon as federal health officials raised questions. But when ConAgra’s Banquet-brand chicken and turkey pot pies were tied to a similar salmonella outbreak in October, the Omaha company waited two days to recall them, first issuing only a consumer health warning.Peanut butter is regulated by the FDA, while pot pies are regulated by the USDA, because USDA has long had authority over meat and poultry.Ready-to-eat foods like peanut butter, which is eaten right out of the jar, receive closer scrutiny

because there is greater danger if harmful bacteria are present in those foods. Products like pot pies must be cooked first, and proper cooking kills most bacteria.According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the pot pies sickened more than 270 people, the peanut butter at least 625.Neither the FDA nor the USDA had the authority to order ConAgra to recall the products. In fact, all food recalls, except for those involving infant formula, are voluntary. Often, the government gets a product recalled by warning the company it could face bad publicity if it does not withdraw the food.An advisory committee created in response to concerns about recalls of imported products — including dog food and toothpaste — will suggest changing that.The commission, created in July in response to concerns about recalls of imported items, will recommend to President Bush that the FDA be empowered to order recalls of products deemed a risk to

consumers, an administration official said Monday. Congress would have to approve such a step.The official, speaking condition of anonymity because the recommendations have not been publicly released, said Bush will receive the recommendations Tuesday.At least a dozen federal agencies share responsibility for keeping America’s food safe, with the FDA and the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service playing the biggest roles. But none of the agencies use the same rule book.The USDA and FDA sometimes must inspect the same food plant. For instance, the USDA inspects plants where frozen pepperoni pizza is made, because of the meat topping. But the FDA is responsible for inspecting plants that make frozen cheese pizzas.In the two ConAgra contamination cases, it turns out that an FDA inspector hadn’t been to the company’s peanut butter plant in Georgia for two years before the recall, while a USDA inspector visits the Missouri pot pie plant

daily.The Center for Science in the Public Interest’s DeWaal said the FDA cannot ensure a safe food supply. “The FDA’s current domestic inspection program is a joke,” she said.Federal regulators and the food industry say the food safety system needs to be adjusted, not overhauled.America’s food is “really remarkably safe,” said David Acheson, the FDA’s top food safety official.A recent report by the Government Accountability Office, the investigative arm of Congress, noted that about 61 percent of the $1.7 billion the federal government spends on food safety went to the Agriculture Department in 2003, which is responsible for regulating about 20 percent of the food supply.The FDA, which is responsible for most of the remaining 80 percent, gets only about 29 percent of the total.“FDA’s food program is very small compared to its task,” said William Hubbard, a top FDA official for 14 years who now pushes for stiffer food safety

regulations and more resources for his former employer.In addition to making daily visual checks of all meat processing operations, the USDA tests between 10,000 and 12,000 samples of ground beef each year for E. coli contamination.But this year, more than 30 million pounds of ground beef — enough to make 120 million quarter-pound burgers — has been pulled off the market in 18 recalls because of possible E. coli contamination. That included the second-largest recall in U.S. history, which put Topps Meat Co. out of business. The most recent ground beef recall, involving Cargill Inc., took place over the weekend.At least 65 sicknesses but no deaths have been linked to this year’s ground beef recalls. In 2006, there were just eight beef recalls and no reported illnesses.“What we have seen this summer is obviously a wake-up call,” said Richard Raymond, USDA undersecretary for food safety. USDA officials are trying to determine why they are

seeing more E. coli.The CDC tracks food-borne illnesses in 10 states as a barometer for the nation, and found that the rate of confirmed food-borne illness cases fell about 28 percent from 1996 to 2006, when there were 38.4 cases per 100,000 people.The CDC estimates 76 million of the roughly 300 million people who live in the United States get sick each year. More than 300,000 of those are hospitalized, and about 5,000 people die from food-borne illnesses each year.“I think the food industry has a very long history of not doing anything on food safety unless it has to,” said Marion Nestle, a New York University professor who wrote a book on the subject.Associated Press White House Correspondent Terence Hunt contributed to this report.On the Net:FDA: www.fda.govUSDA Food Safety and Inspection Service: www.fsis.usda.govCenters for Disease Control and Prevention: www.cdc.govCenter for Science in the

Public Interest outbreak database: www.cspinet.org/foodsafety/outbreakGrocery Manufacturers’ Association: http://www.gmabrands.com

Get easy, one-click access to your favorites. Make your homepage.