Guest guest Posted February 3, 2006 Report Share Posted February 3, 2006 Hi, all. I have included several articles I have recently come across on the subjects of " military drills, " the Iranian oil bourse, and nuclear attack on Iran. I have included information from Webster Griffin Tarpley, activist political expert and author of 9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in the USA, and Michel Chossudovsky of Centre for Research on Globalization, http://www.globalresearch.ca <http://www.globalresearch.ca/> , who are knowledgeable in these areas and have written articles and books on these subjects. I have also included commentary on Webster Griffin Tarpley's 9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in the USA by Ingri Cassel, Director, Vaccination Liberation, http://www.vaclib.org <http://www.vaclib.org/> For more info on Webster Griffin Tarpley and 9/11-Synthetic Terror- Made in the USA, please visit http://www.tarpley.net <http://www.tarpley.net/> and http://www.tvnewslies.org <http://www.tvnewslies.org/> Hope you can also listen to the radio program with Judy Andreas on the American Voice, http://www.radio.theamericanvoice.com/ (see Ingri's email below; starts at 8 pm central time). Please feel free to forward this information. Thank you for your help. Sincerely, Suzanne People for a Healthy Planet http://www.peopleforahealthyplanet.org <http://www.peopleforahealthyplanet.org/> Protecting health, democracy, and the environment. Honest information. Grassroots citizen action. mail -------------- Commentary on Webster Griffin Tarpley's 9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in the USA ~by Ingri Cassel, Director, Vaccination Liberation, http://www.vaclib.org <http://www.vaclib.org/> Webster Griffin Tarpley does have accurate information. His latest book, 9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in the USA, is must reading for all 911 truth activists and anyone who wants to get involved to make sure another " 911 " doesn't happen in this country, or elsewhere. What Tarpley points out, and with plenty of real history and evidence to back him up, is that these " military drills " are used as the perfect cover for the real thing. He has shown that the more the local news and area residents are alerted to and publicly opposed to the planned drill taking place, the more likely the operation is axed. We are in the process of reprinting/upgrading our Report of the Citizens Commission on 911 for mass distribution so more Americans can see the facts that have surfaced about the real terror events on 9/11/01, and the subsequent cover-up of these facts by our govt. and media. Suzanne, I strongly encourage you to get Tarpley's masterful 911 analysis. I just ordered it from Borders and picked it up on Friday. I am having a hard time putting it down... In the Spirit of Truth, Ingri Cassel, director Vaccination Liberation P.O. Box 457 Spirit Lake, Idaho 83869 (208) 255-2307 / (888) 249-1421 vaclib www.vaccinetruth.com www.vaclib.org Free Your Mind..... From the Vaccine Paradigm " When we give government the power to make medical decisions for us, we, in essence, accept that the state owns our bodies. " ~U.S.Representative Ron Paul, MD --- The number of people now being alerted to these military drills being a possible cover for the real thing has increased -- thanks to the internet and 911 researchers who have confirmed that 15 such drills occurred on 9/11/01. My opinion is that these planned events are postponed when enough people are on to them. Webster Griffin Tarpley's book addresses all this and more and is truly a must read. ~Ingri --- Yes, you can use anything I say in email. Also, Michel Chossudovsky is an awesome researcher and the info. at www.globalresearch.ca is very credible. Our sister publication in Switzerland, Current Concerns, front paged Chossudovsky's article, " Nuclear War Against Iran " in their Jan. 2006 edition. www.currentconcerns.ch Personally, I wouldn't consider Szymanski's article as a hoax as much as it is a warning and a call to be very aware of planned military " drills " . Again, Tarpley's book says a lot. Attached is a review of a talk he gave in New York on Jan. 15 that you may find interesting. The author, Judy Andreas, will be on our radio program in 30 min. http://www.radio.theamericanvoice.com/ ~Ingri -------------- Webster Griffin Tarpley Graces St. Marks Church By Judy Andreas " As long as people believe in absurdities, they will continue to commit atrocities. " Voltaire On Sunday, January 15, 2006, a capacity crowd packed into St. Marks Church in NYC, to hear Webster Griffin Tarpley speak. The event was sponsored by 911Truth.org. Though old man winter was having a tantrum outside and New York City was a combination of frigid temperature and wind chill, people braved the elements to hear the affable Mr. Tarpley give a remarkable presentation. His information was boundless and the audience could not get enough. An hour after the talk had concluded, people were still asking questions. Webster Griffin Tarpley is an activist, historian and expert on international terrorism. He is known for his famous book, George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography which he wrote in 1992 with Anton Chaikin. Mr. Tarpley's latest bombshell book, 9/11-Synthetic Terror- Made in the USA, was released in October of 2005 and has recently gone into a second printing. It is a brilliant book that explores the attacks of September 11, 2001 as an example of state-sponsored, false-flag terrorism that was carried out by a rogue network within the US government A mesmerized crowd listened to Webster Tarpley's explanation of the roles of the " patsies " (Mohammed Atta, Osama Bin Ladin), " moles " (powerful people in the government) and " professionals " on 911. He said that this way of operating has been standard in the US for many years. The patsies, dupes, useful idiots and fanatics are the scapegoats. (like Lee Harvey Oswald) The government officials are loyal to a private network and have to make certain that nobody interferes with the patsies beforehand. The professional killers shoot and leave. Webster Tarpley took a survey of the people in the room, to ascertain how many people were seasoned 911 truth seekers. Many of the people were new to the information. In order to help put things into perspective, he summarized some of the anomalies inherent in the official story of the events of September 11th, 2001. " There was no proof that the 19 supposed highjackers had any connection to 911. " Tarpley asserted. He talked about the impossibility of " patsies " flying the planes and suggested that it was accomplished by Global Hawk, a remote control system which took over the crafts and flew them into the targets. Tarpley even referred to the bulge on the bottom of one of the planes. There has been a great deal of controversy around this bulge, which was introduced in Dave Von Kleist's film " 911 In Plane Site. " Mr. Von Kleist has taken a lot of heat from debunkers. " Such bulges should be taken seriously. " Tarpley insisted. " That was not a commercial aircraft " , one woman called out. " I saw it....I was across the street from WTC at the time " She reported how much trouble she had had trying to get people to listen to her story.. Tarpley questioned why there had been no air defense for one hour and 45 minutes. His answer was " Moles work in the USAF and NORAD " . He talked about the plethora of evidence pointing to the fact that the buildings had been brought down by controlled demolition. The fires did not burn hot enough or long enough to collapse the World Trade Center. Tarpley mentioned such buildings as The Windsor building in Madrid, which burned for 48 hours and only a couple of the top floors collapsed. Tarpley talked about the Pentagon and the size of the hole that was created by the supposed plane that crashed into it. He explained why it could not have been a Boeing that hit it. Tarpley's talk demonstrated that the official accounts of the Pentagon crash, the fall of the Twin Towers and WTC 7, as well as the crash of United 93 in Shanksville were physically impossible. His facts made a convincing argument that " four misfit highjackers " being able to pilot commercial jets defied the boundaries of physical and technical reality For some people in the audience this was a basic review, but others were hearing much of this information for the first time. They were incredulous. The second printing of 911 Synthetic Terror - Made In The USA, is now available, and, in it, Webster Tarpley has included some of the newer information that has emerged in the past year; information such as " Able Danger " . According to Wikipedia: " Able Danger was a highly classified United States Special Operations Command military intelligence program under the command of the U.S. Special Operations Command (SOCOM). It was created as a result of a directive from the Joint Chiefs of Staff in early October 1999 by the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Hugh Shelton, to develop an Information Operations Campaign Plan against transnational terrorism, " specifically al-Qaeda. " According to statements by Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer and confirmed by four others, Able Danger had identified the September 11, 2001 attack leader Mohammed Atta, and three of the 9/11 plot's 19 hijackers, as possible members of an al-Qaeda cell linked to the '93 World Trade Center Attacks. The group used all information legally collected under the rule of law. Primarily consisting of classified information, all publicly obtained information was approved after a legal review of SOCOM lawyers. The early identification of the four hijackers by Able Danger appears to contradict the official conclusion of the 9/11 Commission, that American intelligence agencies had not identified Atta as a terrorist prior to the attack. This has resulted in a political controversy that has begun to damage the credibility of the bipartisan 9/11 Commission. " Supposedly, a small group of intelligence employees ran " Able Danger " from the fall of 1999 until February 2001 - just seven months before the terrorist attacks - when the operation was axed. To link Mohammed Atta to al-Qaeda, the operation's information technology specialists used data mining and fusion techniques to search terabyte-sized data sets from open sources - such as travel manifests, bank transactions, hotel records, credit applications - and compared this material with classified information. During the operation's life cycle, the group sought help from the CIA, but the agency was reluctant to cooperate. Tarpley's bold assertion is that " Able Danger " did not involve a group whose purpose was to " observe " Atta and his cohorts, but rather, it involved a group whose purpose was to " control " them. " Able Danger are the controllers, " Tarpley stated. " They helped Atta get through the day....they gave him money ....they told him what to do....how to behave. " Interestingly, to date Able Danger has not been allowed to testify and has managed to destroy their own records. Apparently, they have destroyed approximately 2.5 terabytes of data. Another fascinating presentation was Tarpley's detailed account of the 15 drills which were conveniently occurring on the day of September 11th. " It was the highest concentration of military drills in United States history, " he stated. People traditionally view drills as a protective strategy when, in reality, they are quite the opposite. The purpose of the drills is to deceive; often there comes a day when the drills morph into the real deal. Such a day was September 11, 2001. Tarpley surprised a great many of the attendees by declaring that he believes George Bush and Dick Cheney were told very little prior to September 11, 2001. He said that the President and Vice President have merely been puppets since FDR's administration. People who feel that all the problems will be solved when this duo is no longer in power are missing the larger picture; they are unaware of the rogue government puppeteers. The President has merely become the salesman of the myth of September 11th. Mr. Tarpley included a detailed explanation of the various schools of 911 analysis, beginning with the official version of the story. He talked about the LIHOP crowed (those who believe that the government LET It Happen On Purpose) and the MIHOP group (those who believe that the government MADE It Happen On Purpose), Tarpley is a MIHOP. The one area in which I disagreed with Webster Tarpley was his insistence that the Mossad had little, if anything, to do with the events of 911. He dismissed the group of " celebrating Israelis " and stated that the Mossad is always watching us, and before he will incriminate them, he needs to be shown more conclusive evidence. I believe that evidence is there to be found. Tarpley talked about his anger at Ward Churchill who he believes is the worst of the " left gatekeepers " . Churchill has stated that if you don't believe the official version of 911, you are a racist, for you are denying the capacity of Arabs to execute such a maneuver. This line of reasoning merely props up the official story with " we deserved it " rhetoric. Webster Tarpley talked about the telephone call between Putin and Bush. Apparently, Bush had given Putin an ultimatum stating that the United States intended to take over Afghanistan and other Central Asia bases. Putin, being quite clever, offered no resistance. He knew that the United States would merely weaken itself by such an action. This has become a reality, for as Russia is building itself up, the United States has become vastly unpopular. " We are in a world financial crisis, " Tarpley continued. Tarpley believes that the reason for the crime and tragedy of 9/11 was to save the US/British Empire from falling, by providing an excuse to destroy countries that have planned to change the currency in which they trade from US Dollars - which support the Empire - to Euros, thus leading to the fall of the US/British dollar Empire of the world. The fall of the US Dollar would halt the possibility of US world domination. The so-called " War on Terror " is really a war on the countries that threaten to bring down the US Empire And now, towards the end of March, Iran will start trading in Euros. " 911 is the key to stopping World War 3 " , Tarpley concluded. I have only touched on a small part of the lecture. To truly understand what was being shared, I strongly recommend purchasing Webster Griffin Tarpley's book, 911 Synthetic Terror - Made In The USA. It should be required reading for all honest truth seekers. The hardest job lies ahead of us. We must extend ourselves beyond the walls of St. Marks Church. We must go out into our communities. We must organize events. We must talk to people. We must show videos. If we are to have a future at all, the truth of September 11, 2001 must be revealed. Copyright 2006 Judy Andreas www.judyandreas.com <http://www.judyandreas.com/> JUDE10901 -------------- Activist political expert Webster Tarpley gives State of World Message on Alex Jones Show by John Leonard Sunday, Jan. 29, 2006 at 11:53 AM http://la.indymedia.org/news/2006/01/145842.php <> Author Tarpley will be giving his cutting, contrarian, but enormously revealing analysis of current crises in Iran, Palestine, the putative " war on terror " and the disturbing state of our union: Monday 12 noon EST. Washington, DC, Jan. 29. The expert on state-sponsored terrorism, Webster G. Tarpley, will be giving his trenchant analyses of the latest world and domestic crises in a live interview on the Alex Jones radio talk show, at 12 noon Eastern Time this Monday, Jan. 30th. The current agenda can include Ahmadinejadi's Iran, the latest bin Laden tape, the Hamas election victory, and the nuclear anti-terror drills scheduled in Charleston, SC from Tuesday through Thursday this week, Jan. 31 through Feb. 2. Tarpley's analysis of the Iran crisis highlights the Iranian oil bourse scheduled to open March 20th, which is set to undermine US dominance of world oil and currency reserves, as a more severe challenge to the imperial world order than Iran's nuclear program, and thus the real motive for the unprecedented open threats of nuclear aggression by the US. In his latest book, " 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA, " Tarpley points out how the CIA created Osama bin Laden, how " Al Qaeda " serves US interests, and how " ex-intelligence agents " like Ward Churchill render disinformation services on the 9/11 conspiracy. He is the first commentator to grasp the paradox that " bin Laden's " alleged endorsement of William Blum's book " Rogue State " is a buttress to the official 9/11 myth of " Arab revenge, " in the face of growing awareness of the truth about 9/11. Although many observers have noted how Islamist extremism is the own worst enemy of the Islamic nations, Tarpley's book may be the only one in print to cogently present the historical record for a surprising conclusion: such fanaticism is no accidental growth of the sociology of religion, but a deliberate artifice of Anglo-American subversion techniques of destabilizing rival states. Tarpley was also the first 9/11 researcher to make clear how " anti-terror drills " are used as a cover for spectacular acts of state-sponsored synthetic terror. In the second edition of " 9/11 Synthetic Terror " released this month, Tarpley updates this to include the London 7/7 bombings, and calls on peace activists to proactively protest, publicize and shut down such drills before they can " go live " as a nuclear 9/11. The Alex Jones show is broadcast live on shortwave on WWCR 9.985 and affiliates. The first hour is rebroadcast is from 9 p.m. Central on 5.765, and the second and third hours are on 3.215. For more info see http://www.infowars.com/listen.html. The Internet streaming radio broadcast is at http://www.infowars.com . Mr. Tarpley will also be taping an interview with Dreamland Radio, coincidentally also based in Austin, TX, on Feb. 1. Note. John Leonard, California-based author of this press release and publisher of " 911 Synthetic Terror, " has also posted his own analysis of the above crises at http://www.waronfreedom.org/activists/clash.txt . --- This information (eight part series by Tarpley) has since been taken down. Eight part series: The coming war against Iran http://www.daanspeak.com/IranAttack01Eng.html Webster Tarpley: Staged attack to precede war In part 1 of this series Webster Tarpley points to the phrase 'another 9/11-type terrorist attack' as it appears in an article by ex-CIA agent Philip Giraldi, who sees such an attack as a precondition for war against Iran. Tarpley writes <http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article10010.htm> : 'It is evident that such a determined warmonger as Cheney is hardly likely to leave the coming of that indispensable terrorist provocation to chance: the terror event that provides the pretext for war must be an integral part of the plan being pushed through the US bureaucracy by the secret government, their spokesmen Bush and Cheney, and the neocon faction in general. We are dealing in short with state sponsored terrorism.' Giraldi writes <http://www.amconmag.com/2005_08_01/article3.html> : 'Several senior Air Force officers involved in the planning are reportedly appalled at the implications of what they are doing-that Iran is being set up for an unprovoked nuclear attack-but no one is prepared to damage his career by posing any objections.' Tarpley: 'The synthetic terror event required by the Bush-Cheney clique and its masters is likely to be conducted through the US military and intelligence apparatus under the cover of a terror drill or a war exercise. http://www.daanspeak.com/IranAttack02Eng.html Serious implications feared A war against Iran is seen by the US and Israel as a way to achieve otherwise divergent strategic goals. Military plans, legislation and psychological manipulation are now being fine-tuned and put into place in order to carry out a war against Iran. In two recent articles, author <http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/search-handle-url/index=books & field-autho r-exact=Webster%20Griffin%20Tarpley & rank=-relevance%2C%2Bavailability%2C-dat erank/103-3064532-7563807> Webster Tarpley observes <http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article10010.htm> 'feverish US-UK preparations for a new 9/11 of state-sponsored, false flag synthetic terrorism which is intended in the intentions of the terrorist controllers in London and Washington to set the stage for the attack on Iran, as well as for martial law austerity dictatorships throughout the English-speaking world, and beyond.' Tarpley is the author of a book that deals with the role secret services played in the creation of cover stories for September 11th, as well as how what actually happened on that day was carried out. The book <http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0930852311/qid=1127684110/sr= 8-1/ref=pd_bbs_1/103-3064532-7563807?v=glance & s=books & n=507846> is entitled 9/11 - Synthetic Terror - Made in USA; 'synthetic terror' because the terror on 9/11 has its origins not in " real terrorism " but in the United States itself. http://www.daanspeak.com/IranAttack01Eng.html --- Target Iran. War with No End By Steve Weissman t r u t h o u t | Perspective Thursday 20 January 2005 <http://www.truthout.org/docs_05/012005A.shtml> http://www.truthout.org/docs_05/012005A.shtml --- Forwarded to me from Louise at Zeus Info Service: Comment: It's all about money, of course... IRAN, BOURSE AND THE U.S. DOLLAR http://www.newswithviews.com/public_comm/public_commentary31.htm " When bullets become the commodity to secure a currency, it is a clear sign of devastating calamity looming. To ignore the warning signs, is to suffer like you have never suffered before, or to die. Harsh words, but true. " By Ed Haas Don <don.stacey Stacey January 28, 2006 NewsWithViews.com On November 10th 2005, the Muckraker Report published an article that described one of the unspoken reasons why the United States had to invade Iraq; to liberate the U.S. dollar in Iraq so that Iraqi oil could once again be purchased with the petrodollar. See The liberation of the U.S. Dollar in Iraq In November 2000, Iraq stopped accepting U.S. dollars for their oil. Counted as a purely political move, Saddam Hussein switched the currency required to purchase Iraqi oil to the euro. Selling oil through the U.N. Oil for Food Program, Iraq converted all of its U.S. dollars in its U.N. account to the euro. Shortly thereafter, Iraq converted $10 billion in their U.N. reserve fund to the euro. By the end of 2000, Iraq had abandoned the U.S. dollar completely. Two months after the United States invaded Iraq, the Oil for Food Program was ended, the country's accounts were switched back to dollars, and oil began to be sold once again for U.S. dollars. No longer could the world buy oil from Iraq with the euro. Universal global dollar supremacy was restored. It is interesting to note that the latest recession that the United States endured began and ended within the same timeframe as when Iraq was trading oil for euros. Whether this is a coincidence or related, the American people may never know. In March 2006, Iran will take Iraq's switch to the petroeuro to new heights by launching a third oil exchange. The Iranians have developed a petroeuro system for oil trade, which when enacted, will once again threaten U.S. dollar supremacy far greater than Iraq's euro conversion. Called the Iran Oil Bourse, an exchange that only accepts the euro for oil sales would mean that the entire world could begin purchasing oil from any oil-producing nation with euros instead of dollars. The Iranian plan isn't limited to purchasing one oil-producing country's oil with euros. Their plan will create a global alternative to the U.S. dollar. Come March 2006, the Iran Oil Bourse will further the momentum of OPEC to create an alternate currency for oil purchases worldwide. China, Russia, and the European Union are evaluating the Iranian plan to exchange oil for euros, and giving the plan serious consideration. If you are skeptical regarding the meaning of oil being purchased with euros versus dollars, and the devastating impact it will have on the economy of the United States, consider the historic move by the Federal Reserve to begin hiding information pertaining to the U.S. dollar money supply, starting in March 2006. Since 1913, the year the abomination known as the Federal Reserve came to power, the supply of U.S. dollars was measured and publicly revealed through an index referred to as M-3. M-3 has been the main stable of money supply measurement and transparent disclosure since the Fed was founded back in 1913. According to Robert McHugh, in his report (What's the Fed up to with the money supply?), McHugh writes, " On November 10, 2005, shortly after appointing Bernanke to replace Greenbackspan, the Fed mysteriously announced with little comment and no palatable justification that they will hide M-3 effective March 2006. " (To learn more about Robert McHugh's work, please visit [Read] Is it mere coincidence that the Fed will begin hiding M-3 the same month that Iran will launch its Iran Oil Bourse, or is there a direct threat to the stability of the U.S. dollar, the U.S. economy, and the U.S. standard of living? Are Americans being set up for a collapse in our economy that will make the Great Depression of the 1930's look like a bounced check? If you cannot or will not make the value and stability of the U.S. currency of personal importance, if you are unwilling to demand from your elected officials, an immediate abolishment of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 and the fiat money scheme that the banking cartel has used for nearly a century now to keep our government and our people in a state of perpetual debt, than you are faced with but two alternatives, abject poverty, or invading Iran. The plans to invade Iran are unspoken, but unfolding before our very eyes. The media has been reporting on Iran more often, and increasingly harshly. For the U.S. government to justify invading Iran, it must first begin to phase out the War in Iraq, which it is already doing. Next, it must portray the Iranian President, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, as a threat to the region and the world. Finally, once naive American people are convinced the " weapons of mass destruction " that were to be found in Iraq are actually in Iran, coupled with the almost daily media coverage of Iran's nuclear power / weapons program aspirations, and what we will soon have on our hands is another fabricated war that will result in tens of thousands of civilian lives being lost, all because the political elected pawns in Washington DC lack the discipline to return our currency to a gold or silver standard, end the relationship with the foreign banking cartel called the Federal Reserve, and limit the activities of the U.S. government to those articulated in Article I Section 8 of the Constitution for the United States of America. When a wayward and corrupt fiscal policy and fiat currency, coupled with runaway government spending, forces a nation to only be able to sustain the value of its currency with bullets, the citizenry of the country involved in wars primarily to sustain its currency have historically first became slaves to their government, and then to the nations that finally conquer them. If you question the validity of such a premise, or whether it could happen to the United States of America, study the fall of the Roman Empire. If you read the right books on the subject, you'll quickly discover that towards the end of the Roman reign, the Roman Empire was doing exactly what America is doing today; attempting to sustain a failed fiat money system with bullets. Understanding fiat money is not an easy task, and the Federal Reserve, World Bank, and International Monetary Fund have purposely made it that way. They do not want the American people to realize that the money in their wallet loses its value with each new dollar that they print. They do not want people to understand that our money does not become money until it is borrowed. When the Federal Reserve has money printed, when it is in uncut sheets of paper, it is not yet money. After it is cut, bundled, and placed into the Federal Reserve vaults, it still is not money. It only becomes money once it is borrowed. Consequently, if all debt were to be paid, if the United States didn't have an $8 trillion national debt and the American people were debt free, and if all loans of U.S. dollars made to foreigners were paid in full, there would be exactly zero U.S. dollars in circulation because it will have all been returned to the vaults of the Federal Reserve. This might seem hard to fathom, but it is the gospel of fiat money. The major news media in the United States, fed by Washington DC which in turn is fed by the Federal Reserve, literally, has already begun conditioning the American people for invading Iran. Media accounts of Iran's nuclear ambitions along with amplification of the potential instability and core evilness of Iran's president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, is setting the stage to spring the invasion of Iran on the American people. There does appear to be a direct correlation between the winding down effort underway in Iraq and the increase of anti-Iran rhetoric. How American soldiers ultimately arrive in Tehran is uncertain at this time, but it is reasonable to expect that if the Iran Oil Bourse opens for business in March 2006 as planned, it will only be a matter of time before the United States will have to blow it up. If the United States invades Iran, or if Israel starts military actions by launches missiles at Iran's nuclear power facilities, which then opens the door for the United States to intervene, most Americans will believe that our military actions in Iran will be to defend freedom and liberty while spreading democracy, when the truth is that we'll be fighting a war in Iran because of our nation's relationship with the Federal Reserve, a so-called bank that is not owned by the federal government, maintains no reserve, and isn't a bank at all, but a cartel. Just like our war in Iraq, Americans and foreigners will die in battle so that the historical power bankers and brokers; cartel members such as Rothschild, Morgan, Lehman, Lizard, Schrader, Lobe, Kuhn, and Rockefeller to name a few, can continue collecting interest on every single U.S. coin and dollar bill in circulation, while controlling the U.S. Congress to the extent that the U.S. taxpayer becomes the collateral and lender of last resort to cover bad loans and unpaid debts that these institutions create by loaning money to third world countries, some of which are devout enemies of the United States. Remember the $400 billion savings & loan bailout approved by the U.S. Congress during the Reagan Administration? America is still paying for it - you and me, and so will our children and grandchildren. It is well overdue for Americans, every American, to do whatever it takes to fully understand the relationship between the United States and the Federal Reserve, along with the grave consequences of our current fiat money system; for even if the United States wanted to continue to sustain the supremacy of the U.S. dollar with bullets, it is historically, impossible. When bullets become the commodity to secure a currency, it is a clear sign of devastating calamity looming. To ignore the warning signs, is to suffer like you have never suffered before, or to die. Harsh words, but true. C 2006 Ed Haas - Ed Haas is a freelance writer and author originally from Mt. Penn, Pennsylvania. He currently resides in beautiful Mt. Pleasant , South Carolina. To learn more about Ed's work, please visit www.craftingprose.com. E-Mail: efhaas --- Nuclear War against Iran http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle <http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle & code=%20CH200601 03 & articleId=1714> & code=%20CH20060103 & articleId=1714 by Michel Chossudovsky January 3, 2006 <http://www.globalresearch.ca> GlobalResearch.ca Excerpt (Introduction and Conclusion): The launching of an outright war using nuclear warheads against Iran is now in the final planning stages. Coalition partners, which include the US, Israel and Turkey are in " an advanced stage of readiness " . Various military exercises have been conducted, starting in early 2005. In turn, the Iranian Armed Forces have also conducted large scale military maneuvers in the Persian Gulf in December in anticipation of a US sponsored attack. Since early 2005, there has been intense shuttle diplomacy between Washington, Tel Aviv, Ankara and NATO headquarters in Brussels. In recent developments, CIA Director Porter Goss on a mission to Ankara, requested Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan " to provide political and logistic support for air strikes against Iranian nuclear and military targets. " Goss reportedly asked " for special cooperation from Turkish intelligence to help prepare and monitor the operation. " (DDP, 30 December 2005). In turn, Prime Minister Ariel Sharon has given the green light to the Israeli Armed Forces to launch the attacks by the end of March: All top Israeli officials have pronounced the end of March, 2006, as the deadline for launching a military assault on Iran.... The end of March date also coincides with the IAEA report to the UN on Iran's nucle ar energy program. Israeli policymakers believe that their threats may influence the report, or at least force the kind of ambiguities, which can be exploited by its overseas supporters to promote Security Council sanctions or justify Israeli military action. (James Petras, <http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle & code=PET20051225 & articleId=1635> Israel's War Deadline: Iran in the Crosshairs, Global Research, December 2005) The US sponsored military plan has been endorsed by NATO, although it is unclear, at this stage, as to the nature of NATO's involvement in the planned aerial attacks. " Shock and Awe " The various components of the military operation are firmly under US Command, coordinated by the Pentagon and US Strategic Command Headquarters (USSTRATCOM) at the <http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/facility/offutt.htm> Offutt Air Force base in Nebraska. The actions announced by Israel would be carried out in close coordination with the Pentagon. The command structure of the operation is centralized and ultimately Washington will decide when to launch the military operation. US military sources have confirmed that an aerial attack on Iran would involve a large scale deployment comparable to the US " shock and awe " bombing raids on Iraq in March 2003: American air strikes on Iran would vastly exceed the scope of the 1981 Israeli attack on the Osiraq nuclear center in Iraq, and would more resemble the opening days of the 2003 air campaign against Iraq. Using the full force of operational B-2 stealth bombers, staging from Diego Garcia or flying direct from the United States, possibly supplemented by F-117 stealth fighters staging from al Udeid in Qatar or some other location in theater, the two-dozen suspect nuclear sites would be targeted. Military planners could tailor their target list to reflect the preferences of the Administration by having limited air strikes that would target only the most crucial facilities ... or the United States could opt for a far more comprehensive set of strikes against a comprehensive range of WMD related targets, as well as conventional and unconventional forces that might be used to counterattack against US forces in Iraq (See Globalsecurity.org at <http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/iran-strikes.htm> http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/iran-strikes.htm .... Concluding remarks The implications are overwhelming. The so-called international community has accepted the eventuality of a nuclear holocaust. Those who decide have swallowed their own war propaganda. A political consensus has developed in Western Europe and North America regarding the aerial attacks using tactical nuclear weapons, without considering their devastating implications. This profit driven military adventure ultimately threatens the future of humanity. What is needed in the months ahead is a major thrust, nationally and internationally which breaks the conspiracy of silence, which acknowledges the dangers, which brings this war project to the forefront of political debate and media attentiion, at all levels, which confronts and requires political and military leaders to take a firm stance against the US sponsored nuclear war. Ultimately what is required are extensive international sanctions directed against the United States of America and Israel. Link to entire article: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle <http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle & code=%20CH200601 03 & articleId=1714> & code=%20CH20060103 & articleId=1714 ------------ From Overview of America's " War on Terrorism " by Michel Chossudovsky http://www.globalresearch.ca/globaloutlook/truth911.html In this new and expanded edition of Michel Chossudovsky's 2002 best seller, the author blows away the smokescreen put up by the mainstream media, that 9/11 was an attack on America by " Islamic terrorists " . Through meticulous research, the author uncovers a military-intelligence ploy behind the September 11 attacks, and the cover-up and complicity of key members of the Bush Administration. The expanded edition, which includes twelve new chapters focuses on the use of 9/11 as a pretext for the invasion and illegal occupation of Iraq, the militarisation of justice and law enforcement and the repeal of democracy. According to Chossudovsky, the " war on terrorism " is a complete fabrication based on the illusion that one man, Osama bin Laden, outwitted the $40 billion-a-year American intelligence apparatus. The " war on terrorism " is a war of conquest. Globalisation is the final march to the " New World Order " , dominated by Wall Street and the U.S. military-industrial complex. September 11, 2001 provides a justification for waging a war without borders. Washington's agenda consists in extending the frontiers of the American Empire to facilitate complete U.S. corporate control, while installing within America the institutions of the Homeland Security State. Chossudovsky peels back layers of rhetoric to reveal a complex web of deceit aimed at luring the American people and the rest of the world into accepting a military solution which threatens the future of humanity. --- From " About Centre for Research on Globalization " http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=section <http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=section & sectionName=about> & sectionName=about The Centre for Research on Globalisation (CRG) is an independent research and media group of writers, scholars and activists. It is a registered non profit organization in the province of Quebec, Canada. The Global Research webpage at <http://www.globalresearch.ca/> www.globalresearch.ca based in Montreal publishes news articles, commentary, background research and analysis on a broad range of issues, focussing on social, economic, strategic, geopolitical and environmental processes. Our website was established on the 9th of September 2001, two days before the tragic events of September 11. Barely a few days later, Global Research had become a major news source on the New World Order and Washington's " war on terrorism " . Since September 2001, we have established an extensive archive of news articles, in-depth reports and analysis on issues which are barely covered by the mainstream media. During the war on Iraq, Global Research published, on a daily basis, independent reports from the Middle East, which provided an alternative to the news emanating from the " embedded " journalists reporting from the war theater. Several Global Research authors have received awards for their writings. In 2005, two Global Research authors have received the " Project Censored Award " , University of California at Sonoma. For related articles, please visit the website of the Centre for Research on Globalization, http://www.globalresearch.ca <http://www.globalresearch.ca/> Any copyrighted material cited herein is used strictly in a non-commercial way and is in accordance with the " fair use " doctrine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.