WHAT DOES A BIRD-FLU HOAX ACCOMPLISH?

[Guest guest]

http://www.nomorefakenews.com/archives/archiveview.php?key=2864

 

 

 

WHAT DOES A BIRD-FLU HOAX ACCOMPLISH?

 

2005-10-21

 

 

OCTOBER 21, 2005. I've written several articles pointing out the

obvious scientific hoaxes surrounding the current bird-flu pandemic

nonsense.

 

And I'll have more coming soon on that score.

 

Meanwhile, let's review WHO BENEFITS scaring the pants off everyone

for no good reason.

 

First, the government(s) gets to put troops on the streets. Again.

This continues the conditioning operation, in which private citizens

become accustomed to military presence in civilian locales.

 

This is big. Posse Comitatus continues to erode. The military is hyped

as the only institution that can really protect the population against

all sorts of disasters.

 

Second, there is the opporunity, at some point, to declare emergencies

and QUARANTINES. " Stay home. Don't go out. If you do, you'll be arrested. "

 

Third, the government can begin to take action against any criticism

of the medical authorities and their manipulations. We are now seeing

a Bill working its way through Congress, and this Bill will outlaw any

legal action taken against government or drug companies for injuries

sustained from medical drugs or vaccines given during a state of

emergency---such as an epidemic.

 

Fourth, there will be vaccines forced on the population, to " fend off "

the epidemic. This re-enforces the practice of mandatory medical

treatment.

 

Fifth, vaccines always contain the seeds of toxicity. I'm not just

talking about mercury. There are formaldehyde, aluminum, and other

chemicals in the vaccines. Many vaccines are made by passing germs

through animal products, such as chicken eggs, which already contain a

wide variety of other germs. And of course, the vaccines are injected

directly into the body, bypassing a number of the usual immune defenses.

 

Vaccines, via this toxicity, and by their very nature, SUBSTITUTE for

the body's own natural defense systems. In other words, the vaccines

weaken the body's habit of defending itself.

 

With all this toxicity, the population is weakened under the paradigm

of vaccines. This is obviously good for authoritarian rule. The weaker

the people, the harder it is for them to think and act clearly and

feel the confidence necessary to live as independent

entities.

 

Yes, Virginia, you can achieve all of the above goals merely by hyping

a non-existent pandemic that, at the most, has klled 60 people around

the world in the last several years.

 

Don't forget drugs given for the flu, either. Medicines like Tamiflu

are toxic. They can bring on all sorts of severe adverse effects.

 

The massive propaganda machines of various governments and health

agencies have already achieved a stunning coup. Their hammered

warnings of imminent pandemic have penetrated so far into the

collective consciousness, globally, that even with a sudden

pronouncement of no more than 20 human bird-flu cases in a small town

in the US or England, the people of those countries would agree and

consent to all sorts of draconian measures.

 

Very few people would stop and think about the science or the

politics. People would trample each other to get a flu shot. People

would stay indoors. Businesses would close. Airports around the

country could be shut down with barely a murmur of protest.

 

That's the effect of really good propaganda. You don't need case

numbers that amount to anything. You don't need science. You just need

official liars and the press and the government.

 

That's right. It DOES look a lot like the basic scenario of 1984. You

don't need a real war. You only need the pretense of one.

 

And why would anyone want to so weaken and control a nation like the

US? Because, under the rubric of globalism, every country has to be

reduced and brought down to a lower level of economic and individual

functioning, so that " share and care " elites can continue their moves

toward the rule of the many by the few.

 

Look at a slice of history. Wasn't the dismal human period called the

Middle Ages just the thing for the Roman Church? Didn't that authority

(the few over the many) thrive in such an atmosphere? And when the

Renaissance reared its head with an accompanying mercantilism---when

the individual human being rose up---didn't the iron control of the

Church begin to wane?

 

JON RAPPOPORT www.nomorefakenews.com