Imprisoned Mum's Baby Died After Vaccination

[Guest guest]

" Zeus " <info

Imprisoned Mum's Baby Died After Vaccination

Sun, 10 Jul 2005 13:29:33 +0100

 

 

 

 

E-NEWS FROM THE NATIONAL VACCINE INFORMATION CENTER

Vienna, Virginia

 

http://www.nvic.org

 

" Protecting the health and informed consent rights of children since

1982. "

 

 

================================================================================\

==========

BL Fisher Note:

 

When I was writing the book, DPT: A Shot in the Dark, in the 1980's, I

interviewed many mothers whose babies died within 24 hours of

vaccination.

Some of the babies had either a diagnosed or undiagnosed coinciding viral

or bacterial infection at the time of vaccination. Some were on

antibiotics.

Others were premature, had experienced a difficult birth or had suffered

previous vaccine reactions which were discounted by clueless

pediatricians in denial as unrelated to vaccination.

 

When the HIB (haemophilus influenzae B) vaccine was introduced in the

later 1980's/early 1990's, the National Vaccine Information Center

began to

receive reports of infants suffering bleeding in the brain following

receipt of both DPT and HIB vaccines simultaneously. We reported this

fact to

the FDA. Soon, parents began to be charged with shaken baby syndrome when

their babies died following receipt of multiple vaccines and had

evidence of

bleeding in the brain.

 

Denial and refusal to investigate the biological mechanisms for vaccine

injury and death by industry and government health agencies has resulted

an unknown number of infants and children dying and being brain injured by

vaccines. Innocent children and their parents continue to be

victimized by one-size-fits-all vaccine policies which target the

vulnerable for

sacrifice and then blame the victim when it occurs.

 

 

 

Sally Clark Case:

 

" Harry's death was all the more puzzling since he must have been

well in his final hours, Professor Meadow said. Medical records showed

that he was

inoculated the day he died. " The staff of the clinics do not give

immunisations to a child who is off colour, " Professor Meadow

said. "

 

(We have the newspaper cutting which says Sally Clark's second son was

innoculated the day he died....Zeus)

 

 

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1677573,00.html

Times, UK

July 2, 2005

 

Sally Clark's reputation is put on trial again over cot death

 

By Dominic Kennedy

 

Sir Roy Meadow ruled out natural causes in her sons' deaths.

 

SALLY CLARK, the solicitor cleared of murdering her babies after serving

three years of a life sentence, had her reputation put on trial again

yesterday as Professor Sir Roy Meadow said why he had thought that her

babies were unnaturally killed.

 

The retired paediatrician reminded the General Medical Council of how

many injuries Mrs Clark's sons suffered before they died.

 

Mrs Clark's is the most prominent case involving mothers jailed for

multiple child murders on Professor Meadow's evidence but then

subsequently

cleared. She was released at her second appeal when questions were

raised about

the competence of the pathologist who examined her babies.

 

Professor Meadow, who faces being struck off for misleading the jury in

the Cheshire mother's murder trial, told the GMC disciplinary panel that

nobody would describe her boys as victims of cot deaths. He said that

he had

studied reams of evidence about Mrs Clark's sons.

 

Police had approached him after the death of Harry at two months.

Christopher's previous death at 2½ months was initially attributed to

natural causes, but Professor Meadow thought otherwise.

 

" Although his initial death certificate said he died of lower

respiratory tract infection, I did not think that was appropriate, " he

said.

" I thought it was more likely, in view of both children, that he had been

smothered. "

 

In his report to the police, Professor Meadow said that injuries like

Harry's, who suffered bleeding to the back of the eyes and the spinal

cord,

were similar to those described by medical experts among children who had

been shaken.

 

" In relation to Harry I thought he had the features of physical

abuse, " Professor Meadow said. " I personally do not have great

experience of

shaken babies. It is a very difficult area. I did not know what

combination of

assault could be responsible for the injuries that were described but I

couldn't think of natural causes.

 

" It did seem to me that the injuries being described were such that

in themselves could cause death. They seemed severe injuries. I could

imagine a baby dying of such injuries.

 

" But the injuries reported on Christopher were not in themselves

seeming to me that they would cause a baby to die: however many

bruises he had got

on the back of the leg or elbow or in the mouth or frenulum (between gum

and nose) doesn't make someone die. "

 

Harry's death was all the more puzzling since he must have been well in

his final hours, Professor Meadow said. Medical records showed that he was

inoculated the day he died. " The staff of the clinics do not give

immunisations to a child who is off colour, " Professor Meadow said.

 

" Some observer - whether health visitor, nurse, doctor - would have

seen Harry at that time and presumably considered him well earlier that

day. "

 

Professor David Southall narrowly escaped being struck off by the GMC

recently when he accused Mrs Clark's husband, Stephen, of killing his

sons on the basis of watching a television documentary about the case.

 

The charge against Professor Meadow is that he used incorrect statistics

to make it appear more likely that Mrs Clark had killed her babies, in

particular a figure saying that the chances of two cot deaths for an

affluent, non-smoking, mature mother were 73 million to one. This number

appeared in a draft report based on the world's biggest study into cot

death. Statisticians have queried its accuracy.

 

The report seemed to suggest that a double cot death in a family like

the Clarks was " very rare . . . tiny and for clinical purposes probably

not meaningful " .

 

Professor Meadow said that he had published a study of cot death, or

sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), on his retirement, pointing to

cases in

which smothering was suspected.

 

" I had been involved in cases of quite severe child abuse, " he

said. " I really felt that the term SIDS, which does have some merits and

kindnesses,. . . was nevertheless making us all forget that all SIDS

meant was 'I

don't know' as a diagnosis. My paper was a plea for much better

investigation

of all infant deaths. "

 

The hearing continues.

 

forwarded by

Zeus Information Service

Alternative Views on Health

www.zeusinfoservice.com