Guest guest Posted August 22, 2003 Report Share Posted August 22, 2003 I hear things from them like, " Gee, Emmanuel was older than us in medical school and now he looks so much younger. " Of course, Chinese medicine helps as does a much less stressful life. (I refer you to my picture on my profile). The fact is that we all went to Western medical school thinking that we would be set free by our MDs. >>>>Most MDs these days are miserable, they cant make a living, they are overworked, they cant even make their own decisions. That is why so many are trying things like acupuncture. They want to leave the system. Alon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 22, 2003 Report Share Posted August 22, 2003 Dear Sammy, Lynn, and Esteemed Colleagues, I on the other hand feel that Lynn Detamore's comments are inspired and inspiring. Calling for ever more civilized behavior on a community chat seems a worthy suggestion. Don't you operate a library, Ms. Detamore? Lynn Detamore's civility might indeed be challenging for many of us to live up to, yet it's nice to have ideals. Most of my friends are MDs, and another significant batch of friends are LAcs. I would agree with Ms. Detamore that most from both categories are quite caring people. I would agree with Sammy that many of each are rather suspicious of each other. However, MDs are not in any sort of envious position by my observation. My MD friends are often envious that I had the foresight to leave medical school in my 3rd year and move on to graduate school when I was 39 years old. I hear things from them like, " Gee, Emmanuel was older than us in medical school and now he looks so much younger. " Of course, Chinese medicine helps as does a much less stressful life. (I refer you to my picture on my profile). The fact is that we all went to Western medical school thinking that we would be set free by our MDs. It turned out to be the opposite. I was old enough and mature enough to actually respond to what we all could see. The incredible indebtedness, the lack of sleep through 3rd & 4rth year medical school and then through five years of residency. In those days, only 30% of board certified residents turned themselves in as clinically depressed. My sense is that the rest were mostly in denial. You don't see an income for nine years of training, and then you only see your income lost by paying back industrial strength loans and by paying vast malpractice premiums. I could go on about the relationship with HMOs and other 3rd parties including lawyers, but it's Friday and I'm in too good a mood. Yes, I love Lynn Detamore's suggestion for engaging Sesame Street ethics (at the minimum) and observing opportunities to cooperate. Not sell out, mind you. Definitely stand your ground! But cooperation while being strong within the paradigm of Chinese medicine will strengthen your position as a practitioner. It will also strengthen Chinese medicine as an institution. In Gratitude, Emmanuel Segmen Merritt College, Asia Natural I am sorry but I have to disagree with the writer below for a couple of reasons. 1st Reason: The " behaviour " on this list has not been " derisive, condescending " as she claims. It has in fact been pretty civilised from what I have read on some TCM lists. We need this kind of exchange. 2nd Reason: Western medicine and the institutions and infrastructure which support it is HUGELY CORRUPT. There may be good docs out there as Marcos in Guatemala reported, wish there were more, but there aren't. Just do a Google search on > Lupron scandal < to see what I mean. Sammy. Lynn Detamore [healthworks] 22 August 2003 10:30 Pracitioners teaching western doctors... i really do not understand the need for some of the derisive, condescending behavior exhibited by some group members. come on, let's be decent to one another. presumably, we are all adults here, eh? the days of 'medical deities' are over, save those vestiges of ego that do exist in white coats. it certainly is not fair to label the whole conventional medical establishment, nor any other profession, on the backs of those few self-righteous. those folks exist in every profession, including chinese medicine. we are all here to help patients. let's review some sesame street ethics, and recall examples of cooperation. if an md or do takes a short course in chinese medicine and learns enough to make good referrals in our directions, we only lose out if they don't already have our names and faces in their repetoire of connections! i also don't understand the notion of doctors getting paid 'big money' for medicare services. in real healthcare life no professional or patient can put 'big money' and 'medicare' in the same sentence, except to state that if doctors bill medicare, they'll never see much money, let along big money! it used to be that medical practices put caps on how many medicare patients they could take, sometimes expressed as a percentage of their patient base. at that point, they would not take more medicare patients. ah, but things are very different now. the present trend is that medical practices stop billing medicare altogether, meaning that their medicare patients have to go elsewhere. doctors get screwed by medicare. those few exceptions, the more computerized information is, sometimes end up in jail, or at least with no more medical practice. anyone see the 60 minute episode about the cardiologist and thoracic surgeon in redding, california? from someone who knew both of those doctors professionally, i am told they they were really nice guys. but, they must have been a little full of themselves, enough to think it was ethical to screw the system by which they felt screwed. remember karma, and the golden rule? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 23, 2003 Report Share Posted August 23, 2003 I hear things from them like, " Gee, Emmanuel was older than us in medical school and now he looks so much younger. " Of course, Chinese medicine helps as does a much less stressful life. (I refer you to my picture on my profile). The fact is that we all went to Western medical school thinking that we would be set free by our MDs. >>>>Most MDs these days are miserable, they cant make a living, they are overworked, they cant even make their own decisions. That is why so many are trying things like acupuncture. They want to leave the system. Alon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 23, 2003 Report Share Posted August 23, 2003 Emmanuel wrote: I hear things from them like, " Gee, Emmanuel was older than us in medical school and now he looks so much younger. " Of course, Chinese medicine helps as does a much less stressful life. (I refer you to my picture on my profile). The fact is that we all went to Western medical school thinking that we would be set free by our MDs. >>>>Most MDs these days are miserable, they cant make a living, they are overworked, they cant even make their own decisions. That is why so many are trying things like acupuncture. They want to leave the system. Alon Hi Alon, Yes. I was lucky to see this coming and be mature enough to take action to reorient my life to a healthier direction. Nevertheless, I felt enormous anger for about two years (both on my behalf and on behalf of my fellow students) that the best and brightest minds were getting sucked into a system in which a balanced life was not an option. Your marriage gives you some insight into both the CM and WM side of the situation. I think most people on list do not realize that you carry out a fairly rigorous life. Thus, your posts are quick and to the point. These quick posts belie the fact that you are a good hearted and well meaning individual. I've been wanting to say this on your behalf for awhile now. My own wife is moving along a path similar to Ta-Ya Lee, both an LAc and an MSN nurse practitioner. It's our hope that she will have gained some of the benefits of fitting into the current medical system and yet allowing some of her own classical Chinese culture to shine through the CM side of her practice. This is our current strategy. Ta-Ya Lee seems to have successfully pulled this off. Bravo, Dr. Lee! It's interesting to me that both my wife and Ta-Ya Lee come from the same part of southern Taiwan. Another detail that you are probably aware of is the issue of numbers. There are 125 accredited MD medical school in the U.S. graduating more than 16,000 MDs per year. While I strongly support Maya's balanced views on the dangers of MDs practicing acupuncture, how better can CM influence Western science and Western medicine than if the practitioners of WM actually spend their time and their money to study at least a little Chinese medicine? I realize there's some paradoxical results, but there is also some long term benefit. This kind of makes Sammy's point most relevant that CM can influence WM in positive ways. This has my own position on many of my posts. Also you, Alon, and I have agreed that some of the most interesting people are those whose minds embody both WM and CM. I will again invoke the name of Ta-Ya Lee along with people like Dr. Chiang of Min Tong Herbs, Dr. Ping Qi Kang former faculty at ACTCM, and Dr. John Chen at Lotus Herbs to name just a few. I still contend that the influence of CM on WM will be greater than that of WM on CM, but that's merely one side of a coin ... the side that I can see. In gratitude, Emmanuel Segmen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 23, 2003 Report Share Posted August 23, 2003 >Also you, Alon, and I have agreed that some of the most interesting people are >those whose minds embody both WM and CM. That is my perspective, from the outside - as both student and patient. Neither alone will be sufficient in some cases, and those who understand and embrace both paradigms are more valuable than the sum of their parts - it's a case of 1+1=3. From the perspective of student and patient, the least helpful practitioners are the ones who arrogantly dismiss the knowledge contained in the other paradigm. They limit their potential unecessarily in my view, their attitude is not only detrimental to their cause, but their ability to fulfill their role as 'healer'. While there is sickness that cannot be successfully treated, there remains a need for more understanding common to all. Jackie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 23, 2003 Report Share Posted August 23, 2003 Emmanuel wrote: I hear things from them like, " Gee, Emmanuel was older than us in medical school and now he looks so much younger. " Of course, Chinese medicine helps as does a much less stressful life. (I refer you to my picture on my profile). The fact is that we all went to Western medical school thinking that we would be set free by our MDs. >>>>Most MDs these days are miserable, they cant make a living, they are overworked, they cant even make their own decisions. That is why so many are trying things like acupuncture. They want to leave the system. Alon Hi Alon, Yes. I was lucky to see this coming and be mature enough to take action to reorient my life to a healthier direction. Nevertheless, I felt enormous anger for about two years (both on my behalf and on behalf of my fellow students) that the best and brightest minds were getting sucked into a system in which a balanced life was not an option. Your marriage gives you some insight into both the CM and WM side of the situation. I think most people on list do not realize that you carry out a fairly rigorous life. Thus, your posts are quick and to the point. These quick posts belie the fact that you are a good hearted and well meaning individual. I've been wanting to say this on your behalf for awhile now. My own wife is moving along a path similar to Ta-Ya Lee, both an LAc and an MSN nurse practitioner. It's our hope that she will have gained some of the benefits of fitting into the current medical system and yet allowing some of her own classical Chinese culture to shine through the CM side of her practice. This is our current strategy. Ta-Ya Lee seems to have successfully pulled this off. Bravo, Dr. Lee! It's interesting to me that both my wife and Ta-Ya Lee come from the same part of southern Taiwan. Another detail that you are probably aware of is the issue of numbers. There are 125 accredited MD medical school in the U.S. graduating more than 16,000 MDs per year. While I strongly support Maya's balanced views on the dangers of MDs practicing acupuncture, how better can CM influence Western science and Western medicine than if the practitioners of WM actually spend their time and their money to study at least a little Chinese medicine? I realize there's some paradoxical results, but there is also some long term benefit. This kind of makes Sammy's point most relevant that CM can influence WM in positive ways. This has my own position on many of my posts. Also you, Alon, and I have agreed that some of the most interesting people are those whose minds embody both WM and CM. I will again invoke the name of Ta-Ya Lee along with people like Dr. Chiang of Min Tong Herbs, Dr. Ping Qi Kang former faculty at ACTCM, and Dr. John Chen at Lotus Herbs to name just a few. I still contend that the influence of CM on WM will be greater than that of WM on CM, but that's merely one side of a coin ... the side that I can see. In gratitude, Emmanuel Segmen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 23, 2003 Report Share Posted August 23, 2003 >Also you, Alon, and I have agreed that some of the most interesting people are >those whose minds embody both WM and CM. That is my perspective, from the outside - as both student and patient. Neither alone will be sufficient in some cases, and those who understand and embrace both paradigms are more valuable than the sum of their parts - it's a case of 1+1=3. From the perspective of student and patient, the least helpful practitioners are the ones who arrogantly dismiss the knowledge contained in the other paradigm. They limit their potential unecessarily in my view, their attitude is not only detrimental to their cause, but their ability to fulfill their role as 'healer'. While there is sickness that cannot be successfully treated, there remains a need for more understanding common to all. Jackie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 23, 2003 Report Share Posted August 23, 2003 i agree. but the correct way to go about it is to refer pts to the different disciplines. i do not agree that educated doctors need to know that 1. they are unable to help their pt anymore. 2. they need a course to know that cm can benefit. all it requires is a quick phone call to ask what can be done. then refer & see results & follow on from there. what is the need for weekend courses. if the courses are to be run-why not run them as referrral courses where they will learn what is the scope of cm & not prescription courses where they can copy & do half baked cm/ap to short change pt. this has never happened in a corse. its always give them short cut treatments. i have not said anything in the past few weeks of discussion. but it has always been arequest from all types of doctors whether they are ayurved, allopath(WM), homeopaths- while i was in india. all they wanted was a quick fix point selection for the diagnosis of their knowledge. I HAD TO WARD OFF SUCH PEOPLE AS I COULD SEE THE DETRIMENTAL VALUE OF SUCH COURSES. the simple answer i usedtto give wa a question. for any of your 4 year degree courses can you teach me in 1 weekend to practise. if you can deliver then i can deliver too. at that point everyone used to look around & start wondering why i am saying that. when i said the course is 4 yeasr then they started thinking. so its ignorance that creates this problem. keeping them in ignorance & teaching them in 2 days convinces them that its all quacker, as we like to take 4 yeasr but in reality smart people can learn in 2 days. so please make up your mind what one wishes the ap/cm profession to develop. more of quacks in the eyes of wm. then we are on right track in EDUCATING W/E COURSES TO OUR DOWNFALL IN THE LONG TERM I AM CONTINUING THIS DISCUSSION NOT BECAUSE I HAVE TOO MUCH TIME TO SPEND ON SUCH MATTERS, BUT BECAUSE ITS IMPORTANT FOR ACM TRAINED PERSON TO UNDERSTAND & NOT GET CARRIED AWAY WITH THE FAME OF TEACHING WESTERN MEDICOS ACUPUNCTURE. anand --- jackie <Jackie wrote: > > >Also you, Alon, and I have agreed that some of the > most interesting people > are >those whose minds embody both WM and CM. > > That is my perspective, from the outside - as both > student and patient. > Neither alone will be sufficient in some cases, and > those who understand and > embrace both paradigms are more valuable than the > sum of their parts - it's > a case of 1+1=3. > > From the perspective of student and patient, the > least helpful practitioners > are the ones who arrogantly dismiss the knowledge > contained in the other > paradigm. They limit their potential unecessarily in > my view, their attitude > is not only detrimental to their cause, but their > ability to fulfill their > role as 'healer'. > > While there is sickness that cannot be successfully > treated, there remains a > need for more understanding common to all. > > Jackie > > ===== Anand Bapat Pain Management Specialist Sports Injury Specialist Blacktown, Parramatta, Punchbowl, & Hammondville 0402 472 897 ______________________ Want to chat instantly with your online friends? Get the FREE Messenger http://uk.messenger./ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 24, 2003 Report Share Posted August 24, 2003 What Vanessa asks is very relevant and applicable.....and what Jackie states, needs to be practiced by the allopaths in a much more encompassing way. Their UNDERSTANDING needs to allow a full stand-alone collaboration with AP/OM which CAN really CURE (a word they hate) especially those chronic sicknesses they can't do anything about. But what happens regardless of their endless rationalizations for evidence based reseaerch (who care if it works and gets results)........they for the most part won;t allow us to have that business (money) UNLESS of course they can somehow control it and themselves make money off it. Richard In a message dated 8/24/03 2:55:21 AM, vbirang writes: << Having said that: (the statement below). Wouldn't that apply to the medical community that is not reffering to the alternative medicine group ??? vanessa > >Jackie wrote it: > > From the perspective of student and patient, the > least helpful practitioners > are the ones who arrogantly dismiss the knowledge > contained in the other > paradigm. They limit their potential unecessarily in > my view, their attitude > is not only detrimental to their cause, but their > ability to fulfill their > role as 'healer'. > > While there is sickness that cannot be successfully > treated, there remains a > need for more understanding common to all. >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 24, 2003 Report Share Posted August 24, 2003 Having said that: (the statement below). Wouldn't that apply to the medical community that is not reffering to the alternative medicine group ??? vanessa > >Jackie wrote it: > > From the perspective of student and patient, the > least helpful practitioners > are the ones who arrogantly dismiss the knowledge > contained in the other > paradigm. They limit their potential unecessarily in > my view, their attitude > is not only detrimental to their cause, but their > ability to fulfill their > role as 'healer'. > > While there is sickness that cannot be successfully > treated, there remains a > need for more understanding common to all. > > Jackie > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 24, 2003 Report Share Posted August 24, 2003 Having said that: (the statement below). Wouldn't that apply to the medical community that is not reffering to the alternative medicine group ??? vanessa Undoubtedly - it's just I expected it of them, and I didn't of TCM professionals! I thought at least I would find a patient-centred, ego-in-control situation there. Judging by my experience I can see why there is caution on both sides, for instance on the subject of insulin resistance - or 'so-called insulin resistance' as the leading Nanjing-trained medical herbalists in the UK scoffed. I was astonished at the completeness of his diagnosis and understanding in my own case, and the apparent instant success of his treatment of many symptoms I had no idea could even be related. But the factor he dismissed so arrogantly worsened until I ended up in hospital on an ECG. Even a bona-fide Chinese TCM doctor could not understand why his treatment made matters worse aswell, just insisted that a higher dose must be required, his chosen paradigm could not be lacking. We had exactly the same problem wih a TCM vet. He flatly denied the adverse effects of his prescription, refused to accept the evidence we saw. My western vet was fully supportive of the attempt even though he felt he could not officially refer with something he had no solid information on, but was greatly angered at this response, and rightly so IMO. I see this condition as a huge opportunity for TCM being missed - there is a 'silent' epidemic going on with something like 25% of Americans thought to be insulin resistant, and the percentage that will progress to Syndrome X and diabetes set to explode, according to constitutional genetics I would suspect, with the UK no doubt following in it's wake. WM has nothing to offer, and, with one or two notable exceptions, it seems the English speaking TCM community has no understanding of this modern epidemic, and little interest in growing and developing it's paradigm to tackle it. Why so, when the Chinese themselves are researching like mad it seems? How could there me such an explosion of interest on list over something transient like SARS, and no interest in something affecting millions at home? After all, an estimated 25% of your patients are likely to be affected. With such a vast materi medica at it's disposal I feel this is a great shame. And I don't understand the reluctance to seek or provide the kind of evidence of efficacy WM seeks - truth is truth, it will always hold up to scrutiny, the subjective should match the objective. If an improvement is solely clinical, should it not be defined as such and allowed to stand on it's own merit? I think that is where the WM community feels it cannot trust alternatives, the lack of differentiation between the two. As someone said, if you treat diabetes successfully serum glucose will come down. If you treat insulin resistance successfully insulin will come down. If there is one thing that will make WM sit up and take notice it is data - so why not provide it where it is easy to do so? And why not use it where it provides more information on the efficacy of your own treatment? Efficacy has to be about more than just data for sure - just ask any hypothyroid patient who has 'good numbers' yet still feels like hell. But don't we all want both - both alone can deceive after all. Both my western doctor and vet are feeling pretty helpless, though both earnestly trying to find a reliable solution. One or two positive lab reports is all it would take to reassure them, and a few such cases it is often all that is required to peak the interest of the research establishment. If I ever find a solution for the horse, you can be damn sure I will get the data published! There is interest within the establishment in Europe. The new EU legislation that will register and licence all western herbs has a very broad remit for collecting evidence on safety and efficacy for monographs, and is welcomed by the herbalists who are actually involved (as opposed to commercial herbal supplement manufacturers). TCM professionally prescribed will not be affected, but it would be great if all the chinese data was translated and available soon too IMO. Jackie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 24, 2003 Report Share Posted August 24, 2003 WM has nothing to offer, and, with one or two notable exceptions, it seems the English speaking TCM community has no understanding of this modern epidemic, and little interest in growing and developing it's paradigm to tackle it >>>Not true. First diet can control syndrome X. Second drugs like glucophage can increase insulin sensitivity. Third syndrome X is only known of because of WM. Alon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 24, 2003 Report Share Posted August 24, 2003 And I don't understand the reluctance to seek or provide the kind of evidence of efficacy WM seeks - truth is truth, it will always hold up to scrutiny, the subjective should match the objective. If an improvement is solely clinical, should it not be defined as such and allowed to stand on it's own merit? I think that is where the WM community feels it cannot trust alternatives, the lack of differentiation between the two. >>>There is a huge reluctance to use true audit of CM. The process is not even part of the educational system. I believe it started in suwan and lingshu where it basically states that everything is already known and it is only the physician job to learn what is there. This than lead to this sense of perfection, the Master really knows etc. There is no base questioning of the system. Instead in all begins with faith not western style investigative mind Alon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 24, 2003 Report Share Posted August 24, 2003 If there is one thing that will make WM sit up and take notice it is data - so why not provide it where it is easy to do so? And why not use it where it provides more information on the efficacy of your own treatment? Efficacy has to be about more than just data for sure - just ask any hypothyroid patient who has 'good numbers' yet still feels like hell. But don't we all want both - both alone can deceive after all. >>>WM will do so in a minute. A study of diabetes does not need a placebo arm because the lab finding will be considered an objective findings. But do not hold your breath waiting for such study in US. Unless the diet is changed (which is sufficient by it self for type II) herbs can not do it. As i said in the past, the hospital i worked in in China studied the TCM treatment of diabetes, and had both their own Dr treat patients, and had Dr from all over China that published that they can treat it successfully studied in the hospital. They had what is called in China a diabetes study institute (group). The result did not show TCM herbs being capable of controlling diabetes except for very mild cases of Type II cases (as i said this can be done with diet alone). TCM herbs can not control type 1 diabetes at all. Alon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 24, 2003 Report Share Posted August 24, 2003 >>>Not true. First diet can control syndrome X. Only to a limited extent - which eg in a horse means never being allowed to go out in a field and eat grass again. Dietary control isn't enough - unless the problem was solely caused by bad diet or excess weight in the first place. >>Second drugs like glucophage can increase insulin sensitivity. Yes, but it is hypoglycemic - so no use until the subject has impaired glucose tolerance, like many of the TCM herbs. Hyperinsulinemia can be present 10 or 20 years before then, so there is a great need for a substance that can address this at root - by increasing insulin sensitivity. There are drugs like acarbose, or better yet green tea, that slow the absorption of carbohydrate, which are a useful control measure, but unfortunately little use to a horse as they cause microbial disruption of the hindgut as a consequence. >>Third syndrome X is only known of because of WM. Does that matter? If there are symptoms, surely the condition could be both definable, and treatable in TCM? Jackie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 24, 2003 Report Share Posted August 24, 2003 >The result did not show TCM herbs being capable of controlling diabetes except >for very mild cases of Type II cases (as i said this can be done with diet alone). As I say, maybe in terms of controlling blood glucose, but not hyperinsulinemia, not sufficiently, and not in all cases. I am pretty sure whatever is fundamentally changing the metabolism of horses must be affecting humans as well. Though the equivalent can be acheived by 'poor management' of either species for sure, and some are more at risk due to their genetics, there are still cases of eg fit athletes who have never been overweight, on a moderate diet, falling to this syndrome - horse and human. WM researchers are coming to realise this at last as the more healthy succumb. So I guess you might say it is 'very mild type 2' that the answer is most needed for, and where TCM has the most potential benefit - though it is far from clear to me what TCM syndrome is primarily indicated at the level of insulin resistance or hyperinsulinemia without glucose intolerance. Most of the work in China seems to be on the yin deficiency type, eg: http://www.chinaphar.com/1671-4083/23/1181.pdf ....an excellent paper from the point of view of defining more precisely the action of the formula. But in a precis on Yang Yu-tian's article from the Shanghai Da Hua Hospital " The Treatment of 52 Cases of Insulin Resistance Syndrome Based on Pattern Discrimination, " in issue 1, 2002, of Shan Xi Zhong Yi (Shanxi Chinese Medicine), Bob Flaws comments: " My one criticism of this article is that it does not take into consideration spleen qi vacuity, and, in my experience with Western patients with this condition, spleen vacuity often plays a significant part. " Which brings me back to the need to identify precisely which spleen qi tonic formulas/herbs affect insulin, in what way. I wonder if you know if he has investigated this and elaborates in the book? Jackie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 24, 2003 Report Share Posted August 24, 2003 In a message dated 8/24/03 1:09:08 PM Eastern Daylight Time, alonmarcus writes: Third syndrome X is only known of because of WM. Hi,, I have to say that my experience with this is that I was taught this syndrome not by that name however by Jeffrey Yuen many years ago in the oriental medical training I received from him. I found it interesting that it was finally named by western medicine as syndrome X but for me CM found it first. By the way I am not against WM, their doctors or their information. Most of the current findings in WM for me point up the value of the training I received in OM. I can often fill in the gaps in the studies where they say they don't know why something works from my training and I can tell generally if a new drug will work from that also although not so much with the new genome derived drugs. I am not for pursuing a war between us/them but I would like to see credit given correctly. Thanks!! Bobbi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 24, 2003 Report Share Posted August 24, 2003 Yes, but it is hypoglycemic - so no use until the subject has impaired glucose tolerance, like many of the TCM herbs. >>>no its not. Glucophage makes cells more sensitive to insulin and can not cause hypoglasimia like other drugs. Also, it is now being recommended as like extension drug in healthy people.It can be used before the onset of diabetes in people at risk. A diet such as Atkins has controlled every patient that I have put on it and followed it. I have quite a few that were able to stop insulin Alon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 24, 2003 Report Share Posted August 24, 2003 Does that matter? If there are symptoms, surely the condition could be both definable, and treatable in TCM? >>>It is only definable by TCM late when definite symptoms arise. While you can pick up early by various blood tests Alon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 25, 2003 Report Share Posted August 25, 2003 >>>It is only definable by TCM late when definite symptoms arise. While you can pick up early by various blood tests IME, in both horse and human, there is a clear pattern, though not one that WM recognises it seems, especially since they stopped measuring insulin at all in a human GTT. Surely TCM would recognise sudden loss of energy and reduced capacity for exercise for instance, muscle myopathies, or recurrent hypoglycemia and carbohydrate craving? That would be a spleen syndrome would it not? Is hyperpigmentation described under any syndrome in TCM out of interest? These and many more symptoms can occur with what is described as 'a normal GTT' in humans, though with horses any insulin raised outside of normal range is considered abnormal and worthy of attention, though it is only just now being recognised as such by the veterinary profession! A tendancy to obesity or abnormal fat deposition (fat pads even with ribs showing) is often the first symptom seen in them, though the ischemic disaster of laminitis is usually when the bloods start to be drawn. The microvascular consequences of hyperinsulinemia seem to be that much more dire in horses, way before glucose intolerance develops, if it ever does. Jackie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 25, 2003 Report Share Posted August 25, 2003 Yes, but it is hypoglycemic - so no use until the subject has impaired glucose tolerance, like many of the TCM herbs. >>>no its not. Glucophage makes cells more sensitive to insulin and can not cause hypoglasimia like other drugs. I am sorry that is not correct, I have the safety data sheet right here, and it gives warnings of hypoglycemia. It reduces hepatic glucose output as well as increasing insulin sensitivity and slowing carbohydrate absorption. The risk of hypoglycemia is undoubtedly lower than with sulfonylureas, and may not be possible alone with diabetics (who have raised glucose to start with) so maybe I worded that too strongly. But those with insulin resistance can be prone to hypoglycemia already. It is not clear if that is because of loss of first stage insulin release, or another reason for the 'overshooting' of insulin. The risk of hypoglycemia was the main reason my doctors were reluctant to let me try it anyway, though I did eventually persuade them recently after my TCM trials to date had failed (though inquiring minds still want to know why!) I refer you to the following review article for confirmation: http://www.ecu.edu/intmedresidency/currentresidents/Review%20Articles/third% 20collection/Metformin.pdf >>A diet such as Atkins has controlled every patient that I have put on it and followed it. I have quite a few that were able to stop insulin. Very impressive. It does seem to be remarkably successful, though of course it is unfortunately of no use to a horse! Maybe it will be left to the vets to find a solution to the whole deal for that reason. I hope not, I for one have no desire to become an out and out carnivore either! Jackie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 25, 2003 Report Share Posted August 25, 2003 The risk of hypoglycemia was the main reason my doctors were reluctant to let me try it anyway, though I did eventually persuade them recently after my TCM trials to date had failed (though inquiring minds still want to know why!) >>>>I spent a day with a internist that could not speak enough about the merits of it Alon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 25, 2003 Report Share Posted August 25, 2003 Surely TCM would recognise sudden loss of energy and reduced capacity for exercise for instance, muscle myopathies, or recurrent hypoglycemia and carbohydrate craving? That would be a spleen syndrome would it not? >>>>Are you saying most people with the potential to develop syndrome x have these symptoms? Alon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 25, 2003 Report Share Posted August 25, 2003 My own wife is moving along a path similar to Ta-Ya Lee, both an LAc and an MSN nurse practitioner. It's our hope that she will have gained some of the benefits of fitting into the current medical system and yet allowing some of her own classical Chinese culture to shine through the CM side of her practice. This is our current strategy. Ta-Ya Lee seems to have successfully pulled this off. Bravo, Dr. Lee! It's interesting to me that both my wife and Ta-Ya Lee come from the same part of southern Taiwan. >>>>Emmanuel thans for you kind words. i think it is very possible even these days. She should do well and hopefully by example influence those around her Alon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 25, 2003 Report Share Posted August 25, 2003 From the perspective of student and patient, the least helpful practitioners are the ones who arrogantly dismiss the knowledge contained in the other paradigm. They limit their potential unecessarily in my view, their attitude is not only detrimental to their cause, but their ability to fulfill their role as 'healer'. >>>>Not only that, the problem is more that they cant see outside their own narrow point of view. They are the same as MDs that choose to not study the evidence for alternative med. They disease from ignorance and with their loud barking they do not even realize how dumb they sound Alon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.