Can You Trust Chemotherapy to Cure Your Cancer?

[Guest guest]

As reported in The Best Years in Life Health News

 

Can You Trust Chemotherapy to Cure Your Cancer?

Wednesday, July 23, 2008 by: Andreas Moritz (see all articles by this author)

 

 

 

(NaturalNews) Former White House press secretary Tony Snow died in July

2008 at the age of 53, following a series of chemotherapy treatments

for colon cancer. In 2005, Snow had his colon removed and underwent six

months of chemotherapy after being diagnosed with colon cancer. Two

years later (2007), Snow underwent surgery to remove a growth in his

abdominal area, near the site of the original cancer. "This is a very

treatable condition," said Dr. Allyson Ocean, a gastrointestinal

oncologist at Weill Cornell Medical College. "Many patients, because of

the therapies we have, are able to work and live full lives with

quality while they're being treated. Anyone who looks at this as a

death sentence is wrong." But of course we now know, Dr. Ocean was dead

wrong.

 

The media headlines proclaimed Snow died from colon cancer, although they knew he didn't have a colon anymore. Apparently, the malignant cancer

had "returned" (from where?) and "spread" to the liver and elsewhere in

his body. In actual fact, the colon surgery severely restricted his

normal eliminative functions, thereby overburdening the liver and

tissue fluids with toxic waste. The previous series of chemo-treatments

inflamed and irreversibly damaged a large number of cells in his body,

and also impaired his immune system -- a perfect recipe for growing new cancers.

Now unable to heal the causes of the original cancer (in addition to

the newly created ones), Snow's body developed new cancers in the liver

and other parts of the body.

 

The mainstream media,

of course, still insist Snow died from colon cancer, thus perpetuating

the myth that it is only the cancer that kills people, not the

treatment. Nobody seems to raise the important point that it is

extremely difficult for a cancer patient to actually heal from this

condition while being subjected to the systemic poisons of chemotherapy

and deadly radiation. If you are bitten by a poisonous snake and don't

get an antidote for it, isn't it likely that your body becomes

overwhelmed by the poison and, therefore, cannot function anymore?

 

Before Tony Snow began his chemo-treatments for his second colon

cancer, he still looked healthy and strong. But after a few weeks into

his treatment, he started to develop a coarse voice, looked frail,

turned gray and lost his hair. Did the cancer do all this to him?

Certainly not. Cancer doesn't do such a thing, but chemical poisoning

does. He actually looked more ill than someone who has been bitten by a

poisonous snake.

 

Does the mainstream media ever report about the overwhelming scientific

evidence that shows chemotherapy has zero benefits in the five-year

survival rate of colon cancer patients?

Or how many oncologists stand up for their cancer patients and protect

them against chemotherapy treatment which they very well know can cause

them to die far more quickly than if they received no treatment at all?

Can you trustingly place your life into their hands when you know that

most of them would not even consider chemotherapy for themselves if

they were diagnosed with cancer? What do they know that you don't? The

news is spreading fast that in the United States physician-caused

fatalities now exceed 750,000 each year. Perhaps, many doctors no longer trust in what they practice, for good reasons.

 

"Most cancer patients in this country die of chemotherapy...

Chemotherapy does not eliminate breast, colon or lung cancers. This

fact has been documented for over a decade. Yet doctors still use

chemotherapy for these tumors... Women with breast cancer are likely to

die faster with chemo than without it." - Alan Levin, M.D.

 

An investigation by the Department of Radiation Oncology, Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Australia,

into the contribution of chemotherapy to 5-year survival in 22 major

adult malignancies, showed startling results: The overall contribution

of curative and adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in

adults was estimated to be 2.3% in Australia and 2.1% in the USA."

[Royal North Shore Hospital Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2005

Jun;17(4):294.]

 

The research covered data from the Cancer Registry in Australia and the

Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results in the USA for the year 1998.

The current 5-year relative adult survival rate for cancer in Australia

is over 60%, and no less than that in the USA. By comparison, a mere

2.3% contribution of chemotherapy to cancer survival does not justify

the massive expense involved and the tremendous suffering patients

experience because of severe, toxic side effects resulting from this treatment. With a meager success rate of 2.3%, selling chemotherapy as a medical treatment

(instead of a scam), is one of the greatest fraudulent acts ever

committed. The average chemotherapy earns the medical establishment a

whopping $300,000 to $1,000,000 each year, and has so far earned those

who promote this pseudo-medication (poison) over 1 trillion dollars.

It's no surprise that the medical establishment tries to keep this scam

alive for as long as possible.

 

In 1990, the highly respected German epidemiologist, Dr. Ulrich Abel

from the Tumor Clinic of the University of Heidelberg, conducted the

most comprehensive investigation of every major clinical study on chemotherapy drugs

ever done. Abel contacted 350 medical centers and asked them to send

him anything they had ever published on chemotherapy. He also reviewed

and analyzed thousands of scientific articles published in the most

prestigious medical journals. It took Abel several years to collect and

evaluate the data. Abel's epidemiological study, which was published on

August 10, 1991 in The Lancet, should have alerted every doctor

and cancer patient about the risks of one of the most common treatments

used for cancer and other diseases. In his paper, Abel came to the

conclusion that the overall success rate of chemotherapy was

"appalling." According to this report, there was no scientific evidence

available in any existing study to show that chemotherapy can "extend

in any appreciable way the lives of patients suffering from the most

common organic cancers."

 

Abel points out that chemotherapy rarely improves the quality of life.

He describes chemotherapy as "a scientific wasteland" and states that

even though there is no scientific evidence that chemotherapy works,

neither doctor nor patient is willing to give up on it. The mainstream

media has never reported on this hugely important study, which is

hardly surprising, given the enormous vested interests of the groups

that sponsor the media, that is, the pharmaceutical companies.

A recent search turned up exactly zero reviews of Abel's work in

American journals, even though it was published in 1990. I believe this

is not because his work was unimportant -- but because it is

irrefutable.

 

The truth of the matter would be far too costly for the pharmaceutical

industry to bear, thus making it unacceptable. If the mass media

reported the truth that medical drugs, including chemotherapy drugs,

are used to practically commit genocide in the U.S. and the world,

their best sponsors (the pharmaceutical companies) would have to

withdraw their misleading advertisements from the television media,

radio stations, magazines, and newspapers. But neither group wants to

go bankrupt.

 

Many doctors go as far as prescribing chemotherapy drugs to patients

for malignancies that are far too advanced for surgery, with the full

knowledge that there are no benefits at all. Yet they claim

chemotherapy to be an effective cancer treatment, and their

unsuspecting patients believe that "effective" equals "cure." The

doctors, of course, refer to the FDA's definition of an "effective"

drug, one which achieves a 50% or more reduction in tumor size for 28

days. They neglect to tell their patients that there is no correlation

whatsoever between shrinking tumors for 28 days and curing the cancer

or extending life. Temporary tumor shrinkage through chemotherapy has

never been shown to cure cancer or to extend life. In other words, you

can live with an untreated tumor for just as long as you would with one

that has been shrunken or been eliminated by chemotherapy (or

radiation).

 

Chemotherapy has never been shown to have curative effects for cancer.

By contrast, the body can still cure itself, which it actually tries to

do by developing cancer. Cancer is more a healing response than it is a

disease. The "disease" is the body's attempt to cure itself of an

existing imbalance. And sometimes, this healing response continues even

if a person is subjected to chemotherapy (and/or radiation).

Unfortunately, as the previously mentioned research has demonstrated,

the chances for a real cure are greatly reduced when patients are

treated with chemotherapy drugs.

 

The side effects of the treatment can be horrendous and heartbreaking

for both patients and their loved ones, all in the name of trustworthy

medical treatment. Although the drug treatment comes with the promise

to improve the patient's quality of life, it is just common sense that

a drug that makes them throw up and lose their hair, while wrecking

their immune system, is doing the exact opposite. Chemo-therapy can

give the patient life-threatening mouth sores. It attacks the immune

system by destroying billions of immune cells (white blood cells). Its

deadly poisons inflame every part of the body. The drugs can slough off

the entire lining of their intestines. The most common side effect

experienced among chemo patients is their complete lack of energy. The

new additional drugs now given to many chemo patients may prevent the

patient from noticing some of the side effects, but they hardly reduce

the immensely destructive and suppressive effect of the chemotherapy

itself. Remember, the reason chemotherapy can shrink some tumors is

because it causes massive destruction in the body.

 

If you have cancer, you may think that feeling tired is just part of

the disease. This rarely is the case. Feeling unusually tired is more

likely due to anemia, a common side effect of most chemotherapy drugs.

Chemo drugs can dramatically decrease your red blood cell levels, and

this reduces oxygen availability to the 60-100 trillion cells of your

body. You can literally feel the energy being zapped from every cell of

your body -- a physical death without dying. Chemo-caused fatigue has a

negative impact on day-to-day activities in 89% of all patients. With

no energy, there can be no joy and no hope, and all bodily functions

become subdued.

 

One long-term side effect is that these patients' bodies can no longer

respond to nutritional or immune-strengthening approaches to cancerous

tumors. All of this may explain why cancer patients who do not receive

any treatment at all, have an up to four times higher remission rate

than those who receive treatment. The sad thing is that chemotherapy

does not cure 96% to 98% of all cancers anyway. Conclusive evidence

(for the majority of cancers) that chemotherapy has any positive

influence on survival or quality of life does not exist.

 

To promote chemotherapy as a treatment for cancer is misleading, to say

the least. By permanently damaging the body's immune system and other

important parts, chemo-therapy has become a leading cause of

treatment-caused diseases such as heart disease, liver disease, intestinal diseases, diseases of the immune system, infections, brain diseases, pain disorders, and rapid aging.

 

Before committing themselves to being poisoned, cancer patients need to

question their doctors and ask them to produce the research or evidence

that shrinking a tumor actually translates to any increase in survival.

If they tell you that chemotherapy is your best chance of surviving,

you will know they are lying or are simply misinformed. As Abel's

research clearly demonstrated, there is no such evidence anywhere to be

found in the medical literature. Subjecting patients to chemotherapy

robs them of a fair chance of finding or responding to a real cure and

deserves criminal prosecution.

 

Andreas Moritz's book, Cancer is not a Disease - It's a Survival

Mechanism, explains the root causes of cancer and how to eliminate them

for good. Available through (www.ener-chi.com) or (www.amazon.com) .

 

 

About the author

Andreas Moritz is a

medical intuitive; a practitioner of Ayurveda, iridology, shiatsu, and

vibrational medicine; a writer; and an artist. He is the author of The

Amazing Liver and Gallbladder Flush, Timeless Secrets of Health and

Rejuvenation, Lifting the Veil of Duality, Cancer Is Not a Disease,

It's Time to Come Alive, Heart Disease No More, Diabetes No More,

Simple Steps to Total Health, Diabetes -- No More, Ending the AIDS Myth

and Heal Yourself with Sunlight. For more information, visit the

author's website (www.ener-chi.com).

[Guest guest]

This is so true. I was a volunteer helping cancer patients with every day tasks like shopping, cleaning, gardening, providing meals etc.

Not one of the patients survived.

During our orientation, we were told that we had to learn to "accept" it when some refused treatment. We were also told that they were in denial.

 

May < Can You Trust Chemotherapy to Cure Your Cancer?

 

 

As reported in The Best Years in Life Health News

 

..

[Guest guest]

Thanks for posting this article!

 

-Melissa W

 

, NWEagle <NWRaven wrote:

>

> Can You Trust Chemotherapy to Cure Your Cancer?

> http://www.naturalnews.com/023689.html