Guest guest Posted February 16, 2005 Report Posted February 16, 2005 Wed, 16 Feb 2005 21:03:21 +0100 T " Sepp Hasslberger " <sepp Banning Sales of Food Supplements Worldwide > Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:47:33 -0800 (PST) > DitziSis <mk2967 >Re: Banning Sales of Food Supplements Worldwide > > > >According to congress.org, there IS NO S.722, nor HR. 3377. I called >the guy in Washington, have had no response. The only thing I can >think to do is to write congressional members about restricting our >FREEDOM to manage our own health preferences. > >I realize this is IMMEDIATE...IMPORTANT, nay..VITAL. But if this guy >keeps sending emails with info that cannot be researched, he is >doing more harm than good. Regular old everyday people will think >it's more quackery...as many think of alternative methods being >quackery. > >What's a poor old lady to do??? Hi Sis, the bills do in fact exist. Link to S 722: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:s.00722: Link to HR 3377: http://olpa.od.nih.gov/legislation/108/pendinglegislation/dietary.asp I also have some articles on my site on these with more discussion and further links. Here is the one on S 722 http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2003/07/23/s_722_to_overturn_us_vitamin_fre\ edom.htm and here is the one on HR 3377 http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2003/11/07/new_us_bill_on_supplement_ingred\ ients_proposed.htm Kind regards Sepp -- The individual is supreme and finds its way through intuition. Sepp Hasslberger Quote
Guest guest Posted February 16, 2005 Report Posted February 16, 2005 GOD BLESS YOU FOR THIS INFO!!! I knew some kind of bills had to exist...but I REALLY needed a link to send out.....to prove it. We're not just fighting the establishment/admistration, we're fighting stupidity and prejudice. Thank you, thank you, THANK YOU! = Wed, 16 Feb 2005 21:03:21 +0100 T " Sepp Hasslberger " <sepp Banning Sales of Food Supplements Worldwide > Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:47:33 -0800 (PST) > DitziSis <mk2967 >Re: Banning Sales of Food Supplements Worldwide > > > >According to congress.org, there IS NO S.722, nor HR. 3377. I called >the guy in Washington, have had no response. The only thing I can >think to do is to write congressional members about restricting our >FREEDOM to manage our own health preferences. > >I realize this is IMMEDIATE...IMPORTANT, nay..VITAL. But if this guy >keeps sending emails with info that cannot be researched, he is >doing more harm than good. Regular old everyday people will think >it's more quackery...as many think of alternative methods being >quackery. > >What's a poor old lady to do??? Hi Sis, the bills do in fact exist. Link to S 722: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:s.00722: Link to HR 3377: http://olpa.od.nih.gov/legislation/108/pendinglegislation/dietary.asp I also have some articles on my site on these with more discussion and further links. Here is the one on S 722 http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2003/07/23/s_722_to_overturn_us_vitamin_fre\ edom.htm and here is the one on HR 3377 http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2003/11/07/new_us_bill_on_supplement_ingred\ ients_proposed.htm Kind regards Sepp -- The individual is supreme and finds its way through intuition. Sepp Hasslberger http://www.blueaction.org " Better to have one freedom too many than to have one freedom too few. " http://www.sharedvoice.org/unamerican/ Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.