Guest guest Posted April 3, 2003 Report Posted April 3, 2003 In a message dated 4/3/03 9:54:42 AM Eastern Standard Time, herbal remedies writes: I know that garlic has immune strengthening properties, right? Only when raw and properly exposed to air..... mjh Quote
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2003 Report Posted April 3, 2003 In a message dated 4/3/03 9:54:42 AM Eastern Standard Time, herbal remedies writes: The active ingredient, carvacrol, is found in high amounts only in true oregano, Origanum vulgare. As well as in Thymbra spicata and some species of Thymus. mjh Quote
Guest guest Posted May 31, 2004 Report Posted May 31, 2004 I know of one case where this is so. Will > So I would still like to know if Lloyd is not defending an LAc that is > being sued for usage of aristolic acid containing herbs that lead to damage. > William R. Morris, OMD, MSEd Secretary, AAOM Dean of Educational Advancement Emperor's College of TOM 310-453-8383 Quote
Guest guest Posted May 31, 2004 Report Posted May 31, 2004 Do you see a correlation between lower academic ability and new-agism, as Bob seemed to suggest? Rory - It is absolutely untrue that new ageism presents a lack of rigor. There are groups of highly competent medical doctors who are capable of higher wu-wu factor than just about any OM professional I have met. This pejorative use of the terms represents a tyranny of belief, and more people have been killed on this planet for such reasons. That said - we need more rigor in admissions, program and entry level requirements. The school you cited as accepting below 2.0 for entry has a problem. ACAOM's 'doctorate as a first professional degree' task force is involved in establishing just such a new set of standards and I invite anyone to send comments and recommendations to ACAOM directly or to AAOM as a representative organization. Will William R. Morris, OMD, MSEd Secretary, AAOM Dean of Educational Advancement Emperor's College of TOM 310-453-8383 Quote
Guest guest Posted May 31, 2004 Report Posted May 31, 2004 At 9:46 AM -0400 5/31/04, WMorris116 wrote: >It is absolutely untrue that new ageism presents a lack of rigor. There are >groups of highly competent medical doctors who are capable of higher wu-wu >factor than just about any OM professional I have met. This >pejorative use of the terms represents a tyranny of belief, and more >people have been killed on this planet for such reasons. -- Will, just in case it wasn't clear from my question, I agree with you. I think when people are objecting to something they label new age, or religious, they should gives some clear examples of exactly what it is they object to and why. I find the generalities that pervade this and other threads quite disturbing, and remarkably wooly -- hence my question. Rory -- Quote
Guest guest Posted May 31, 2004 Report Posted May 31, 2004 I know of one case where this is so. Will >>>>Will do you know what the rational is? Alon Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.