Can You Trust Chemotherapy to Cure Your Cancer?

[Guest guest]

This article came from

Mike Adams who I’m a little skeptical of. I do; however, have a

step mother who is struggling with metasized (sp?) breast cancer. She had

a double mastectomy 7 years ago and now she has cancer pretty much

everywhere. It’s covering her liver, her spinal cord but not in her

brain. I also have a good friend whose father has bladder

cancer. I have not read much about cancer and chemo to have much of an

opinion. Has anyone else done any reading or have any thoughts or

experiences with cancer and/or chemo?

 

(NaturalNews) Former

White House press secretary Tony Snow died in July 2008 at the age of 53,

following a series of chemotherapy treatments for colon cancer. In 2005, Snow

had his colon removed and underwent six months of chemotherapy after being

diagnosed with colon cancer. Two years later (2007), Snow underwent surgery to

remove a growth in his abdominal area, near the site of the original cancer.

" This is a very treatable condition, " said Dr. Allyson Ocean, a

gastrointestinal oncologist at Weill

Cornell Medical

College. " Many

patients, because of the therapies we have, are able to work and live full

lives with quality while they're being treated. Anyone who looks at this as a

death sentence is wrong. " But of course we now know, Dr. Ocean was dead

wrong.

 

The media headlines proclaimed Snow died from colon cancer, although

they knew he didn't have a colon anymore. Apparently, the malignant cancer had

" returned " (from where?) and " spread " to the liver and

elsewhere in his body. In actual fact, the colon surgery severely restricted

his normal eliminative functions, thereby overburdening the liver and tissue

fluids with toxic waste. The previous series of chemo-treatments inflamed and

irreversibly damaged a large number of cells in his body, and also impaired his

immune system -- a

perfect recipe for growing new cancers.

Now unable to heal the causes of the original cancer (in addition to the newly

created ones), Snow's body developed new cancers in the liver and other parts

of the body.

 

The mainstream media,

of course, still insist Snow died from colon cancer, thus perpetuating the myth

that it is only the cancer that kills people, not the treatment. Nobody seems

to raise the important point that it is extremely difficult for a cancer

patient to actually heal from this condition while being subjected to the

systemic poisons of chemotherapy

and deadly radiation. If you are bitten by a poisonous snake and don't get an

antidote for it, isn't it likely that your body becomes overwhelmed by the

poison and, therefore, cannot function anymore?

 

Before Tony Snow began his chemo-treatments for his second colon cancer, he

still looked healthy and strong. But after a few weeks into his treatment, he

started to develop a coarse voice, looked frail, turned gray and lost his hair.

Did the cancer do all this to him? Certainly not. Cancer doesn't do such a

thing, but chemical poisoning does. He actually looked more ill than someone

who has been bitten by a poisonous snake.

 

Does the mainstream media ever report about the overwhelming scientific

evidence that shows chemotherapy has zero benefits in the five-year survival

rate of colon cancer

patients? Or how many oncologists stand up for their cancer patients and

protect them against chemotherapy treatment which they very well know can cause

them to die far more quickly than if they received no treatment at all? Can you

trustingly place your life into their hands when you know that most of them

would not even consider chemotherapy for themselves if they were diagnosed with

cancer? What do they know that you don't? The news is spreading fast that in

the United States

physician-caused fatalities now exceed 750,000 each year. Perhaps, many doctors no longer trust in

what they practice, for good reasons.

 

" Most cancer patients in this country die of chemotherapy... Chemotherapy

does not eliminate breast, colon or lung cancers. This fact has been documented

for over a decade. Yet doctors still use chemotherapy for these tumors... Women

with breast cancer are likely to die faster with chemo than without it. " -

Alan Levin, M.D.

 

An investigation by the Department of Radiation Oncology, Northern Sydney

Cancer Centre, Australia,

into the contribution of chemotherapy to 5-year survival in 22 major adult

malignancies, showed startling results: The overall contribution of curative

and adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults was estimated

to be 2.3% in Australia and

2.1% in the USA. "

[Royal North Shore

Hospital Clin Oncol (R

Coll Radiol) 2005 Jun;17(4):294.]

 

The research covered data from the Cancer Registry in Australia and the Surveillance Epidemiology and

End Results in the USA

for the year 1998. The current 5-year relative adult survival rate for cancer

in Australia is over 60%,

and no less than that in the USA.

By comparison, a mere 2.3% contribution of chemotherapy to cancer survival does

not justify the massive expense involved and the tremendous suffering patients

experience because of severe, toxic side effects resulting

from this treatment. With a meager success rate of 2.3%, selling chemotherapy

as a medical

treatment (instead of a scam), is one of the greatest fraudulent acts ever

committed. The average chemotherapy earns the medical establishment a whopping

$300,000 to $1,000,000 each year, and has so far earned those who promote this

pseudo-medication (poison) over 1 trillion dollars. It's no surprise that the

medical establishment tries to keep this scam alive for as long as possible.

 

In 1990, the highly respected German epidemiologist, Dr. Ulrich Abel from the

Tumor Clinic of the University

of Heidelberg, conducted

the most comprehensive investigation of every major clinical study on chemotherapy drugs

ever done. Abel contacted 350 medical centers and asked them to send him

anything they had ever published on chemotherapy. He also reviewed and analyzed

thousands of scientific articles published in the most prestigious medical

journals. It took Abel several years to collect and evaluate the data. Abel's

epidemiological study, which was published on August 10, 1991 in The Lancet, should have alerted every

doctor and cancer patient about the risks of one of the most common treatments

used for cancer and other diseases. In his paper, Abel came to the conclusion

that the overall success rate of chemotherapy was " appalling. "

According to this report, there was no scientific evidence available in any

existing study to show that chemotherapy can " extend in any appreciable

way the lives of patients suffering from the most common organic cancers. "

 

Abel points out that chemotherapy rarely improves the quality of life. He

describes chemotherapy as " a scientific wasteland " and states that

even though there is no scientific evidence that chemotherapy works, neither

doctor nor patient is willing to give up on it. The mainstream media has never

reported on this hugely important study, which is hardly surprising, given the

enormous vested interests of the groups that sponsor the media, that is, the pharmaceutical

companies. A recent search turned up exactly zero reviews of Abel's work in

American journals, even though it was published in 1990. I believe this is not

because his work was unimportant -- but because it is irrefutable.

 

The truth of the matter would be far too costly for the pharmaceutical industry

to bear, thus making it unacceptable. If the mass media reported the truth that

medical drugs, including chemotherapy drugs, are used to practically commit

genocide in the U.S.

and the world, their best sponsors (the pharmaceutical companies) would have to

withdraw their misleading advertisements from the television media, radio

stations, magazines, and newspapers. But neither group wants to go bankrupt.

 

Many doctors go as far as prescribing chemotherapy drugs to patients for

malignancies that are far too advanced for surgery, with the full knowledge

that there are no benefits at all. Yet they claim chemotherapy to be an

effective cancer treatment, and their unsuspecting patients believe that

" effective " equals " cure. " The doctors, of course, refer to

the FDA's definition of an " effective " drug, one which achieves a 50%

or more reduction in tumor size for 28 days. They neglect to tell their

patients that there is no correlation whatsoever between shrinking tumors for

28 days and curing the cancer or extending life. Temporary tumor shrinkage

through chemotherapy has never been shown to cure cancer or to extend life. In

other words, you can live with an untreated tumor for just as long as you would

with one that has been shrunken or been eliminated by chemotherapy (or radiation).

 

Chemotherapy has never been shown to have curative effects for cancer. By

contrast, the body can still cure itself, which it actually tries to do by

developing cancer. Cancer is more a healing response than it is a disease. The

" disease " is the body's attempt to cure itself of an existing

imbalance. And sometimes, this healing response continues even if a person is

subjected to chemotherapy (and/or radiation). Unfortunately, as the previously

mentioned research has demonstrated, the chances for a real cure are greatly

reduced when patients are treated with chemotherapy drugs.

 

The side effects of the treatment can be horrendous and heartbreaking for both

patients and their loved ones, all in the name of trustworthy medical

treatment. Although the drug treatment comes with the promise to improve the

patient's quality of life, it is just common sense that a drug that makes them

throw up and lose their hair, while wrecking their immune system, is doing the

exact opposite. Chemo-therapy can give the patient life-threatening mouth

sores. It attacks the immune system by destroying billions of immune cells

(white blood cells). Its deadly poisons inflame every part of the body. The

drugs can slough off the entire lining of their intestines. The most common side

effect experienced among chemo patients is their complete lack of energy. The

new additional drugs now given to many chemo patients may prevent the patient

from noticing some of the side effects, but they hardly reduce the immensely

destructive and suppressive effect of the chemotherapy itself. Remember, the

reason chemotherapy can shrink some tumors is because it causes massive

destruction in the body.

 

If you have cancer, you may think that feeling tired is just part of the

disease. This rarely is the case. Feeling unusually tired is more likely due to

anemia, a common side effect of most chemotherapy drugs. Chemo drugs can

dramatically decrease your red blood cell levels, and this reduces oxygen

availability to the 60-100 trillion cells of your body. You can literally feel

the energy being zapped from every cell of your body -- a physical death

without dying. Chemo-caused fatigue has a negative impact on day-to-day

activities in 89% of all patients. With no energy, there can be no joy and no

hope, and all bodily functions become subdued.

 

One long-term side effect is that these patients' bodies can no longer respond

to nutritional or immune-strengthening approaches to cancerous tumors. All of

this may explain why cancer patients who do not receive any treatment at all,

have an up to four times higher remission rate than those who receive

treatment. The sad thing is that chemotherapy does not cure 96% to 98% of all

cancers anyway. Conclusive evidence (for the majority of cancers) that

chemotherapy has any positive influence on survival or quality of life does not

exist.

 

To promote chemotherapy as a treatment for cancer is misleading, to say the

least. By permanently damaging the body's immune system and other important

parts, chemo-therapy has become a leading cause of treatment-caused diseases

such as heart disease,

liver disease, intestinal diseases, diseases of the immune system, infections,

brain diseases, pain disorders, and rapid aging.

 

Before committing themselves to being poisoned, cancer patients need to

question their doctors and ask them to produce the research or evidence that

shrinking a tumor actually translates to any increase in survival. If they tell

you that chemotherapy is your best chance of surviving, you will know they are

lying or are simply misinformed. As Abel's research clearly demonstrated, there

is no such evidence anywhere to be found in the medical literature. Subjecting

patients to chemotherapy robs them of a fair chance of finding or responding to

a real cure and deserves criminal prosecution.

 

Andreas Moritz's book, Cancer is not a Disease - It's a Survival Mechanism,

explains the root causes of cancer and how to eliminate them for good.

Available through (www.ener-chi.com)

or (www.amazon.com) .