Guest guest Posted March 4, 2003 Report Share Posted March 4, 2003 FACTS ABOUT THE MEDICAL MALPRACTICE INSURANCE " CRISIS " Why is there an insurance crisis for doctors? Medical malpractice insurance rates have skyrocketed for doctors because of the mismanaged underwriting practices of the insurance industry. These business and accounting practices lead to insurance " crises " every ten years or so. Insurers make their money from investment income. During years of high interest rates and/or excellent insurer profits, insurance companies severely underprice their policies, engaging in fierce competition for premium dollars to invest for maximum return. But when investment income decreases because interest rates drop or insurers’ earlier price cuts make profits unbearably low, insurance companies always respond the same way: by sharply increasing premiums and reducing coverage. Why won’t caps work? Since the legal system is not the cause of these insurance " crises, " enactment of laws blocking injured consumers’ access to the courts or limiting their compensation will not – and have never - lowered insurance costs or rates. This has been documented in many studies, including the 1999 Center for Justice & Democracy study, Premium Deceit: The Failure of " Tort Reform " to Cut Insurance Prices. It is not surprising, then, that when both Nevada and Ohio enacted severe caps on medical malpractice compensation within the last year, insurance companies immediately proclaimed that they would not reduce insurance rates. In California, rates have stayed more moderate because in 1988 that state enacted the strongest insurance regulatory reform law in the nation. On the other hand, Missouri has severe caps on damages and other tort restrictions but is currently suffering through a severe insurance " crisis. " What will work? There is only one way to solve this problem: reforming the business and accounting practices of the insurance industry. One important step is to repeal the industry’s exemption from anti-trust laws, at both the state and federal (McCarran- Ferguson Act) levels. Another important step is to lower claim frequency by weeding bad doctors out of the system through enforcement of better doctor discipline. States should enact measures contained in California’s insurance law, Proposition 103, which requires a 20% rate rollback and prior approval of prices by the state insurance commissioner under rigorous standards and allows consumer groups to intervene in rate hearings. States should also require insurers, as a condition of their license, to undertake risk management and the insurance commissioner should monitor this effort. Gettingwell- / Vitamins, Herbs, Aminos, etc. To , e-mail to: Gettingwell- Or, go to our group site: Gettingwell Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, and more Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 5, 2003 Report Share Posted March 5, 2003 There is a way to give patients some control over their malpractice costs. Have legislatures set up a two tiered system. The patient could then have the option of being insured the old way where the sky is the limit, or he could opt to be covered under a system modeled after the workman's compensation system where fair preordained compensation is awarded for injury. The patient would pay for it separately from the medical bill and agree to it in writing in advance. There is nothing like giving people freedom of choice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.