Guest guest Posted February 12, 2003 Report Share Posted February 12, 2003 Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:30:01 -0500 HSI - Jenny Thompson Riding the Wave RIDING THE WAVE Health Sciences Institute e-Alert February 12, 2003 ************************************************************** Dear Reader, To microwave, or not to microwave? That was the question in an e-Alert I sent you last month ( " Micro Management " 1/27/03) about the effects of microwave cooking on the nutrients in foods. A megawave of e-mail responses followed with questions and some additional information. So inasmuch as this subject is clearly a concern to so many, I'll take a further look at the subject. But I'll tell you right now - the news doesn't get any better. If anything, it gets a little worse. ----------------------------- Back in the U.S.S.R. ----------------------------- An HSI member named Mykola says that the January e- Alert " raises more questions than it answers. " Regarding the U.S.S.R. ban on microwaves in 1976, she wonders if the ban has been lifted. And then there was the Swiss study that was deemed to be so damaging to microwave manufacturers that the Swiss Federal Court found the researchers guilty of " interfering with commerce " and fined them the equivalent of $65,000. Mykola wants to know why the legal action was so successful against the study. She asks, " Was the study flawed? I would sure like to know before I give up my microwave. " I'll start with the easy question: The Soviet ban on microwaves was lifted in the late 1980's with the fall of Communism. This reversal was prompted by the rapid political changes of perestroika - not as a result of any new evidence that found microwaves to be safe. Previous to the 1976 ban, Russian researchers concluded that microwave cooking might create cancer-causing agents in food while causing a degeneration of some essential nutrients. The Swiss study found similar discouraging evidence about microwaved food, but instead of seeing their research greeted as a breakthrough, the scientists who conducted the study were sued by the Swiss Association of Dealers for Electroapparatuses for Households and Industry (SADEHI). As I mentioned, this suit resulted in a stiff fine for the lead researcher, Hans Hertel. But according to some detailed information sent to me by an HSI member named Doug, SADEHI apparently had a very powerful and unfair influence over the Swiss court. This was later recognized when the Swiss decision was reversed by the European Court of Human Rights. ----------------------------- Blood revelations ----------------------------- To answer Mykola's specific question about the validity of the Swiss study: Hertel's research does not appear to be flawed at all. If anything it was far more controlled than most studies. Hertel enlisted eight subjects, who were all in their 20's and 30's. Each of them (including Hertel, who was the ninth subject) followed strict macrobiotic diets. In order to control as many variables as possible, the group lived in the same hotel for a period of eight weeks, and all abstained from smoking, alcohol, and sex. In intervals of two to five days, the subjects ate specific foods on an empty stomach. For instance, on one day they would eat organic vegetables cooked conventionally; on another day they would eat organic vegetables from the same source that had been frozen and then defrosted in a microwave oven; and on another day they would eat organic vegetables cooked in a microwave oven. Immediately before and after each of these meals, blood samples were taken from the subjects. At the end of the eight-week testing period, Hertel's analysis of the blood samples revealed significant conclusions: blood hemoglobin levels decreased significantly after ingesting microwaved foods (both total levels and the amount contained in each red blood cell); white blood cell levels tended to increase for no other reason than foods were microwaved; microwaves altered protein molecules; and LDL cholesterol increased relative to HDL cholesterol. Hertel found that as the study progressed the blood samples revealed anemic tendencies. That trend became increasingly more pronounced toward the end of the study. ----------------------------- Cold comfort ----------------------------- In the January e-Alert, HSI Panelist Allan Spreen, M.D., told us about another microwave study that showed depletion of antibodies and the breakdown of enzymes when breast milk was microwaved. This is an important point for those using bottles with breast milk. It certainly must be tempting to take a shortcut when heating up a bottle for a midnight feeding, but it should be avoided. Microwaving destroys some of the critical disease fighting capabilities in human milk, eliminating a key reason people choose breast milk over formula. Plus, as with food, it creates unpredictable cold spots and hot spots. Microwaved milk that feels warm when tested, may contain hot spots that can burn a baby's mouth. Perhaps the only small piece of good news in this microwave discussion comes from an HSI member named Mike, who says that while he recognizes the dangers of microwave cooking, he disagrees with the idea that low levels of radiation can escape from the ovens. Mike writes: " I used to repair microwave ovens, so I'm familiar with their construction and how they work. The microwaves produced by ovens are the size of a pencil lead and dissipate very quickly. There are three interlocking switches activated by closing the microwave door. If even one of these switches fails to work, the oven will not turn on. With a properly operating oven, the door cannot be opened far enough to allow a wave as large as a pencil lead to escape. " Mike's reassurance is welcome. But it's somewhat cold comfort in light of the existing studies on microwave cooking. Because even if microwaves can't escape the oven, once the food has been altered by microwaves and consumed, we can't escape the old adage: You are what you eat. ************************************************************** ....and another thing It almost sounds like a joke, but if it happened to you or me, we would probably be moaning, not laughing. Last week a Maryland woman filed a malpractice suit after discovering that a twelve-inch-long surgical instrument had been left inside her while undergoing a hysterectomy this past December. For seven weeks following the operation the woman complained of pain in her pelvic area. Before the mistake was discovered, one doctor suggested that she was merely having a panic attack. Sound outrageous? The truly outrageous part of this story is that it's all too common. I recently came across a study in the New England Journal of Medicine that contained this shocking estimate: Surgery tools are left in 1,500 patients each year. In other words, in the years since the first Super Bowl in 1967, you could fill a football stadium with the number of Americans who were wheeled out of an operating room with a sponge, a clamp, or an electrode tucked away inside them. Even more shocking is that because hospitals are not required to report such mistakes, the actual number of patients who take away complementary surgical equipment might be quite a bit higher. The mistakes reported in this study all involved malpractice cases. Not surprisingly, surgical procedures in emergency situations were found to be nine times more likely to lead to these mishaps. Other factors that might cause equipment to end up on the inside of a patient included operations that required unplanned changes in procedures, and patients with higher body-mass index. Some medical experts defend this sort of mix up, pointing out that more than 28 million surgeries are performed in the U.S. each year. But that doesn't explain the fact that this sort of simple and very basic mistake really shouldn't happen even ONE time each year. After all, every surgery has a surgical team. You would think that with a handful of extremely well paid professionals gathered around, whose one and only job at the moment is to tend to the health of the patient, at least one of them would have the presence of mind to make sure that all the items that went inside made their way out. To Your Good Health, Jenny Thompson Health Sciences Institute ************************************************************** Sources: " The Hidden Hazards of Microwave Cooking " Acres USA, April, 1994 " Court Removes Gag Order from Swiss Scientist on Microwaved Food " Leading Edge International " Russians Ban Microwave Ovens " Stephanie Relfe, Health, Wealth & Happiness " Surgery Tools Left in 1,500 People a Year " Jeff Donn, Associated Press, 1/16/03 " Risk Factors for Retained Instruments and Sponges After Surgery, New England Journal of Medicine, V.348:229-235, 1/16/03 " Joppatowne Woman Sues Franklin Square for Malpractice " Associated Press, 2/10/03 Copyright ©1997-2003 by www.hsibaltimore.com, L.L.C. The e-Alert may not be posted on commercial sites without written permission. ************************************************************** Before you hit reply to send us a question or request, please click here http://www.hsibaltimore.com/ealert/questions.html ************************************************************** ************************************************************** If you'd like to participate in the HSI Forum, search past e-Alerts and products or you're an HSI member and would like to search past articles, visit http://www.hsibaltimore.com ************************************************************** To learn more about HSI, call (508) 368-7494 or visit http://www.agora-inc.com/reports/HSI/WHSIC313/home.cfm. ************************************************************** Gettingwell- / Vitamins, Herbs, Aminos, etc. To , e-mail to: Gettingwell- Or, go to our group site: Gettingwell Send Flowers for Valentine's Day Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.