Guest guest Posted May 14, 2009 Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 " Could essential oils extracted from lavender be used as a natural herbicide to prevent weed growth among crops? Research carried out in Italy and reported in the current issue of the International Journal of Environment and Health suggests the answer may be yes. " Interesting.... More here http://www.sciencecentric.com/news/article.php?q=09051463-agricultural-aromather\ apy (or http://tinyurl.com/oopkb8 if the above breaks up) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 16, 2009 Report Share Posted May 16, 2009 Great post with regards to the Lavender! I have been selling essential oils to farmers for quite some time. The EPA has created a list along with FIFRA " 25B, " here you will find about 12 or so essential oils that can be used without regulation for farming. If you read labels on natural, plant based herbicides, pesticides and insecticides they are formulating based off of the 25B list. Here is a link to the list from my knowledge base, https://ingredientmanager.eoilcolab.com/kb_results.asp?cat=5. Be well, Rachel Markel Managing Partner www.eoilco.com www.eiolcolab.com www.GreenTerpene.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 2009 Report Share Posted May 19, 2009 With that idea they are living in cloud cuckoo land. Lavender oil is adulterated on a vast scale due to not enough being grown at an economic price to meet demand. So to use it on crops is a none starter. This looks to me like the hundreds of thousands of other research papers produced to get some wannabe scientists their degrees, or a higher level diploma, or invitations to conferences around the world. The UK MPs expenses scandal is insignificant compared to the money wasted on impracticale science research. Martin Watt ATFE2 , Liz <liztams wrote: > > " Could essential oils extracted from lavender be used as a natural > herbicide to prevent weed growth among crops? Research carried out in > Italy and reported in the current issue of the International Journal > of Environment and Health suggests the answer may be yes. " > > Interesting.... > More here > http://www.sciencecentric.com/news/article.php?q=09051463-agricultural-aromather\ apy > > (or http://tinyurl.com/oopkb8 if the above breaks up) > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 21, 2009 Report Share Posted May 21, 2009 ATFE2 , " Martin Watt " <aromamedical wrote: > > With that idea they are living in cloud cuckoo land. Lavender oil is adulterated on a vast scale due to not enough being grown at an economic price to meet demand. So to use it on crops is a none starter. This looks to me like the hundreds of thousands of other research papers produced to get some wannabe scientists their degrees, or a higher level diploma, or invitations to conferences around the world. The UK MPs expenses scandal is insignificant compared to the money wasted on impracticale science research. > > Martin Watt > Dear Martin, While I appreciate your valuable opinion I just wanted to provide you with an update: on my side of the planet essential oils are being used for farming quite a bit. I have supplied plenty of farms over the years in the U.S. and Canada by the drum. Rosemary and Peppermint Oil for a brussel sprout farmer, clove oil to a potatoe farmer, thyme oil to coat seeds as a protective agent, d-limonene for weed control, by the way it works just a good as round-up. The EPA created a list FIFRA 25B,here you will find the following essential oils cedar, citronella, cinnamon, clove,garlic,lemongrass, mint, peppermint, rosemary, thyme. These ingredients are exempt from regulation at the federal level for use in farming and the creation of biopesticides. Your head would spin if you could see all of the products being formulated off of this list. A leading company in the biopesticide industry is Maroon Organics. Here is an excerpt from the Internet " We are proud to be in the biopesticide business, a crop protection category that is growing, maturing and realizing widespread acceptance in agribusiness globally, " said company founder and CEO, Pam Marrone, upon making the announcement. " What many don't realize is that more than 80 percent of today's biopesticides are used in conventional farming. At Marrone Bio Innovations, we are dedicated to discovering, developing and marketing products for today's and tomorrow's pest management challenges. All of our products are derived from biological, or natural, sources, and are as effective as conventional synthetic chemical pesticides. " So you see Martin, there is a movement away from the use of deleterious chemicals that have wreaked havoc on our planet to a more natural approach. Since the 1950's nearly 80,000 chemicals have been manufactured in the U.S. for use in just about everything, with little or no testing. Smart, innovative people are using things from the past to improve the way we do things in the future. I once had a business partner that poo-pooed every new idea that came across his desk because he was the " expert authority, " on oils. Needless to say we didn't see eye to eye on much of anything. All that I can say is that there's a great big world outside of Aromatherapy. Be well, Rachel Markel Managing Partner www.eoilco.com www.eoilcolab.com www.GreenTerpene.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 21, 2009 Report Share Posted May 21, 2009 Hi Rachel Barrier H (a licensed product used for ragwort control in the UK) is made using only natural plant derivatives from sustainable resources and contains 22.9% Citronella Oil. You are right, there is a large - international - movement looking for innovative ways to use essential oils as pest & herbicidal controls, with great success. Thanks for the information about the US side :-) Liz. > Dear Martin, > > While I appreciate your valuable opinion I just wanted to provide you with an update: on my side of the planet essential oils are being used for farming quite a bit. I have supplied plenty of farms over the years in the U.S. and Canada by the drum. Rosemary and Peppermint Oil for a brussel sprout farmer, clove oil to a potatoe farmer, thyme oil to coat seeds as a protective agent, d-limonene for weed control, by the way it works just a good as round-up. > > The EPA created a list FIFRA 25B,here you will find the following essential oils cedar, citronella, cinnamon, clove,garlic,lemongrass, mint, peppermint, rosemary, thyme. These ingredients are exempt from regulation at the federal level for use in farming and the creation of biopesticides. Your head would spin if you could see all of the products being formulated off of this list. > > A leading company in the biopesticide industry is Maroon Organics. Here is an excerpt from the Internet " We are proud to be in the biopesticide business, a crop protection category that is growing, maturing and realizing widespread acceptance in agribusiness globally, " said company founder and CEO, Pam Marrone, upon making the announcement. > > " What many don't realize is that more than 80 percent of today's biopesticides are used in conventional farming. At Marrone Bio Innovations, we are dedicated to discovering, developing and marketing products for today's and tomorrow's pest management challenges. All of our products are derived from biological, or natural, sources, and are as effective as conventional synthetic chemical pesticides. " > > So you see Martin, there is a movement away from the use of deleterious chemicals that have wreaked havoc on our planet to a more natural approach. Since the 1950's nearly 80,000 chemicals have been manufactured in the U.S. for use in just about everything, with little or no testing. Smart, innovative people are using things from the past to improve the way we do things in the future. I once had a business partner that poo-pooed every new idea that came across his desk because he was the " expert authority, " on oils. Needless to say we didn't see eye to eye on much of anything. All that I can say is that there's a great big world outside of Aromatherapy. > > Be well, > > Rachel Markel > Managing Partner > www.eoilco.com > www.eoilcolab.com > www.GreenTerpene.com > > > > > > --- > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 21, 2009 Report Share Posted May 21, 2009 Hi Rachel, I believe you are referencing Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. They are not " Maroon Organics " , which is completely misleading to the layperson, and their products are not completely organic. They manufacture some products they claim are intended for organic production, but these products are not comprised entirely of biochemicals and I am not sure they have official certified organic status. As an instance, their Greenmatch EX Burndown Herbicide is 50% lemongrass oil and 50% water, corn oil, Glycerol Esters, Potassium Oleate and Lecithin. I believe that Glycerol Esters are primary ingredients in a clinical toxicological investigation of delayed neuropathy and acute poisoning from another pesticide product. Potassium Oleate has been linked to cancer, developmental/reproductive toxicity, allergies, immunotoxicity and contamination conerns. Moreover, a number of organic pesticides recently failed a EU safety review. We cannot forget that all pesticides (from organic source or not) are intended to " kill " pests. And both can be deliterious to the environment and other living beings including man. Looking for organic replacements for synthetic chemical pesticides grossly overlooks the fact that what is really necessary is to learn an entirely different method of farming. One from which no monetary profit can be derived. This is no doubt anathema to some. Permaculture - crop rotation, composting, companion planting, nurturing beneficial pests (ones that eat the bad guys) . . . All reduce the need for fertilizers and pesticides. Organic methods are grounded in the philosophy of feeding and enriching the soil in such a way that you reduce or completely eliminate the crutch of dangerous and damaging fertilizers/pesticides. The ultimate answer is not to find an organic substitute for bad chemicals because you would have to apply as much of the alternative and you would inevitably cause much the same problem as with synthetics. And, as I have pointed out, these products are NOT organic. Here's a good resource to learn more http://ofrf.org/index.html I recently posted this wonderful talk by Michael Pollan (whom I deify and wish would have become our Top Ag Guy under Obama) on my fb page. You will certainly get a sense of the true meaning of organic and the word symbiotic. The part about cows/chickens should certainly open eyes as an example of the optimum process, which has nothing to do with capitalizing on a short sighted substitution of one killer over another. http://tinyurl.com/o6j6q7 You state that Pam Marrone says . . . " 80 percent of today's biopesticides are used in conventional farming . . . " A glaring question is, " Why aren't they being used in organic farming? " The answer is that organic farming doesn't require them. Our industry has its own back yard to clean up. Essential Oil production is not entirely eco-friendly and overharvesting (not to mention deforestation for new crops) is abusive to the point of diminishing and disappearing species. We have just begun to address the issues of fair trade in the essential oil industry and have a long way to go. As another essential oil purveyor, I would not choose getting overly vested in sales of large quantaities of essential oils as pesticides which will further increase demand and stress already overly stressed production capability. Doing this while at the same time remaining ignorant about the true problems of sustainability is, in my mind, akin to criminalty in this century of major worldwide food crises. Sorry if I come across harshly, but I am really tired of the ignorance of those who claim to have a " natural " philosophy that is not reflected in the intelligence of their business practices. Be Well, Marcia Elston, Samara Botane/Nature Intelligence http://www.wingedseed.com http://www.aromaconnection.org " The most commom way people give up their power is by thinking they don't have any " : Alice Walker ________________________________ ATFE2 [ATFE2 ] On Behalf Of ramarkel Thursday, May 21, 2009 9:25 AM ATFE2 [ATFE2] Re: Agricultural aromatherapy ATFE2 <ATFE2%40> , " Martin Watt " <aromamedical wrote: > > With that idea they are living in cloud cuckoo land. Lavender oil is adulterated on a vast scale due to not enough being grown at an economic price to meet demand. So to use it on crops is a none starter. This looks to me like the hundreds of thousands of other research papers produced to get some wannabe scientists their degrees, or a higher level diploma, or invitations to conferences around the world. The UK MPs expenses scandal is insignificant compared to the money wasted on impracticale science research. > > Martin Watt > Dear Martin, While I appreciate your valuable opinion I just wanted to provide you with an update: on my side of the planet essential oils are being used for farming quite a bit. I have supplied plenty of farms over the years in the U.S. and Canada by the drum. Rosemary and Peppermint Oil for a brussel sprout farmer, clove oil to a potatoe farmer, thyme oil to coat seeds as a protective agent, d-limonene for weed control, by the way it works just a good as round-up. The EPA created a list FIFRA 25B,here you will find the following essential oils cedar, citronella, cinnamon, clove,garlic,lemongrass, mint, peppermint, rosemary, thyme. These ingredients are exempt from regulation at the federal level for use in farming and the creation of biopesticides. Your head would spin if you could see all of the products being formulated off of this list. A leading company in the biopesticide industry is Maroon Organics. Here is an excerpt from the Internet " We are proud to be in the biopesticide business, a crop protection category that is growing, maturing and realizing widespread acceptance in agribusiness globally, " said company founder and CEO, Pam Marrone, upon making the announcement. " What many don't realize is that more than 80 percent of today's biopesticides are used in conventional farming. At Marrone Bio Innovations, we are dedicated to discovering, developing and marketing products for today's and tomorrow's pest management challenges. All of our products are derived from biological, or natural, sources, and are as effective as conventional synthetic chemical pesticides. " So you see Martin, there is a movement away from the use of deleterious chemicals that have wreaked havoc on our planet to a more natural approach. Since the 1950's nearly 80,000 chemicals have been manufactured in the U.S. for use in just about everything, with little or no testing. Smart, innovative people are using things from the past to improve the way we do things in the future. I once had a business partner that poo-pooed every new idea that came across his desk because he was the " expert authority, " on oils. Needless to say we didn't see eye to eye on much of anything. All that I can say is that there's a great big world outside of Aromatherapy. Be well, Rachel Markel Managing Partner www.eoilco.com www.eoilcolab.com www.GreenTerpene.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 21, 2009 Report Share Posted May 21, 2009 Need to clarify . . . I said: " Looking for organic replacements for synthetic chemical pesticides grossly overlooks the fact that what is really necessary is to learn an entirely different method of farming. One from which no monetary profit can be derived. This is no doubt anathema to some. " I hope you all forgive the misspellings, as well, but I should clarify that I meant " ancillary " monetary profit. If you are aware, you know that the chemical industry has enslaved farmers across the globe with genetically modified seeds that produce plants that don't produce seeds themselves for future crops, and a dependence on the super-chemical-infused-patented seed which is the only thing that will grow in the nutrient-deprived soil that is a direct result of application of chemical fertilizers and pesticides. The reliance on these GM seeds and the contractual arrangements with companies like Montsano and Union Carbide has truly made slaves of farmers. I certainly did not mean to intimate that the farmers themselves don't have a perfect right to the monetary profits from their crops. The system is simply not working for most of them and there is an urgency to remedy this. I think most of you got the gist, however, I did want to clarify this. Be Well, Marcia Elston, Samara Botane/Nature Intelligence http://www.wingedseed.com http://www.aromaconnection.org " The most commom way people give up their power is by thinking they don't have any " : Alice Walker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 ATFE2 , " Marcia Elston " <Marcia wrote: > > Hi Rachel, > > I believe you are referencing Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. They are not > " Maroon Organics " , which is completely misleading to the layperson, and > their products are not completely organic. They manufacture some products > they claim are intended for organic production, but these products are not > comprised entirely of biochemicals and I am not sure they have official > certified organic status. As an instance, their Greenmatch EX Burndown > Herbicide is 50% lemongrass oil and 50% water, corn oil, Glycerol Esters, > Potassium Oleate and Lecithin. I believe that Glycerol Esters are primary > ingredients in a clinical toxicological investigation of delayed neuropathy > and acute poisoning from another pesticide product. Potassium Oleate has > been linked to cancer, developmental/reproductive toxicity, allergies, > immunotoxicity and contamination conerns. Moreover, a number of organic > pesticides recently failed a EU safety review. > > We cannot forget that all pesticides (from organic source or not) are > intended to " kill " pests. And both can be deliterious to the environment > and other living beings including man. Looking for organic replacements for > synthetic chemical pesticides grossly overlooks the fact that what is really > necessary is to learn an entirely different method of farming. One from > which no monetary profit can be derived. This is no doubt anathema to some. > Permaculture - crop rotation, composting, companion planting, nurturing > beneficial pests (ones that eat the bad guys) . . . All reduce the need for > fertilizers and pesticides. Organic methods are grounded in the philosophy > of feeding and enriching the soil in such a way that you reduce or > completely eliminate the crutch of dangerous and damaging > fertilizers/pesticides. The ultimate answer is not to find an organic > substitute for bad chemicals because you would have to apply as much of the > alternative and you would inevitably cause much the same problem as with > synthetics. And, as I have pointed out, these products are NOT organic. > > Here's a good resource to learn more http://ofrf.org/index.html > > I recently posted this wonderful talk by Michael Pollan (whom I deify and > wish would have become our Top Ag Guy under Obama) on my fb page. You will > certainly get a sense of the true meaning of organic and the word symbiotic. > The part about cows/chickens should certainly open eyes as an example of the > optimum process, which has nothing to do with capitalizing on a short > sighted substitution of one killer over another. > http://tinyurl.com/o6j6q7 > > You state that Pam Marrone says . . . " 80 percent of today's biopesticides > are used in conventional farming . . . " A glaring question is, " Why > aren't they being used in organic farming? " The answer is that organic > farming doesn't require them. > > Our industry has its own back yard to clean up. Essential Oil production is > not entirely eco-friendly and overharvesting (not to mention deforestation > for new crops) is abusive to the point of diminishing and disappearing > species. We have just begun to address the issues of fair trade in the > essential oil industry and have a long way to go. As another essential oil > purveyor, I would not choose getting overly vested in sales of large > quantaities of essential oils as pesticides which will further increase > demand and stress already overly stressed production capability. Doing this > while at the same time remaining ignorant about the true problems of > sustainability is, in my mind, akin to criminalty in this century of major > worldwide food crises. > > Sorry if I come across harshly, but I am really tired of the ignorance of > those who claim to have a " natural " philosophy that is not reflected in the > intelligence of their business practices. > > Be Well, > Marcia Elston, Samara Botane/Nature Intelligence > http://www.wingedseed.com > http://www.aromaconnection.org > " The most commom way people give up their power is by thinking they don't > have any " : Alice Walker > > >Dear Marcia, Thank you for your thoughtful response! Just wondering what planet you would live on that would encourage no monetary compensation for farming? Sorry my friend but the train has left the station and because we are going green in the U.S. that also means using green ingredients. In a perfect world everything would be farmed organic but you and I both know that probably will not happen any time soon. You mentioned that looking for organic replacements for synthetic chemical pesticides grossly overlooks the fact that what is really necessary is to learn an entirely different method of farming. True, I agree with this but synthetic chemicals are killing us, bottom line! So do you think it would be more probable to use biopesticides or revolutionize the whole agricultural industry? I take your criticisms lightly and do not put much weight on the fact that you would not get overly vested in sales of large quantities of oils to farms. Farmers do not buy in 5ml bottles so don't worry about that. Stick to what you know---Aromatherapy! Be well, Rachel Markel Managing Partner eoilco labs www.eoilco.com www.eoilcolab.com www.GreenTerpene.com ________________________________ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 ATFE2 , " ramarkel " <ramarkel wrote: > >Dear Marcia, > > Thank you for your thoughtful response! Just wondering what planet you would live on that would encourage no monetary compensation for farming? Sorry my friend but the train has left the station and because we are going green in the U.S. that also means using green ingredients. In a perfect world everything would be farmed organic but you and I both know that probably will not happen any time soon. > > You mentioned that looking for organic replacements for synthetic chemical pesticides grossly overlooks the fact that what is really > necessary is to learn an entirely different method of farming. True, I agree with this but synthetic chemicals are killing us, bottom line! So do you think it would be more probable to use biopesticides or revolutionize the whole agricultural industry? > > I take your criticisms lightly and do not put much weight on the fact that you would not get overly vested in sales of large quantities of oils to farms. Farmers do not buy in 5ml bottles so don't worry about that. Stick to what you know---Aromatherapy! > > Be well, > > Rachel Markel > Managing Partner > eoilco labs ------- While it would be nice for farmers to use essential oils for pesticides, it is a FACT that bulk essential oils are rarely as genuine as the suppliers claim. If farmers have a struggle getting economic prices for their main crops, I just do not see it being economic for them to use genuine essential oils. Those of us who know the bulk trade, know what is being sold and it is rarely the genuine article. I guess some small organic growers may be able to afford natural pesticides, but only if they can pass the cost on to their customers. >I agree with this but synthetic chemicals are killing us, bottom >line! That is gross overkill, some synthetics yes, but many synthetics not at all. Then what about all the lavender oil touched up with linalool and other synthetics. There are vast amounts of that on the market and other 'touched up' oils. Of course no one in aromatherapy is selling such oils are they!!! Martin Watt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 Rachel, somehow I knew you would misunderstand my reference to monetary compensation . . . hence the second post clarification. And, whoa . . . You know nothing about me, certainly not my acquired knowledge in the aromatic products trade industry beyond aromatherapy, let alone the breadth of our business. If you knew more about our company, you would know that we have been sourcing essential oils worldwide from producers for going on 20 years; we broker and distribute some raw aromatics in quantity; we've developed large manufacturing projects for companies like Costco and Longs Drug, as well as operate retail online and wholesale. Our retail website is just one component, and I don't feel a need to wave an online accomplishment flag for relationships that have developed outside the internet and have nothing to do with our retail online entity. I am passionate about the issues confronting us and I am closely connected to and communicate frequently with other thoughtful researchers who also keep abreast. I've known Martin Watt for a couple of decades now and know the integrity of his work. None of us entirely agree with one another, but we are engaged in a collective effort to identify problems and present possible solutions. If you have taken time to examine the efforts at websites like aromaconnection, cropwatch, springerlink and others, you already know this. I'm not the only one put off by your condescending attitude on this list, and I'm a bit puzzled by it. Are you here to learn more and contribute to issues surrounding aromatherapy (and frequently the larger issues of EO trade) or has someone licked all the red off your candy and you are here simply to bully? The only posts I've seen from you seem to indicate a chip on your shoulder. What can be done to remedy this? I believe you might have a lot to contribute if you wouldn't appear take things so personally. All I expect is a rational, factual viewpoint from anyone I have discussions with, and you can be expected to be challenged if your facts aren't straight, if not by me, then by someone else. This is the way it works. If you agree that organic methods are the answer, then why would you persist to champion that pesticides in any form should be continued and what makes you believe that essential oils are safer? The examples you cited are not good ones, as I carefully pointed out. So long as people agree (like you) that things cannot change for the better anytime soon, it will take longer for necessary changes to occur. I am not naïve and I do not expect magical overnight changes, but I do believe in pushing for changes, certainly those to reverse the devastation we all agree has been wreaked by the chemical industry. I see your point that essential oils are perhaps less dangerous, but are they really, in this context? I challenge you to provide real documented evidence that essential oils as pesticides are any less damaging than their synthetic chemical counterparts when poured in great quantities into a particular ecosystem. And, don't you get it that " organic pesticide " is a complete oxymoron? " Going Green " has been co-opted by so many corporations trying to compete with a grass roots movement to reverse the trend to synthesize and manipulate everything natural . . . I admit that I was totally put off by your waving of that banner, especially without intelligent substance. Be Well, Marcia Elston, Samara Botane/Nature Intelligence http://www.wingedseed.com http://www.aromaconnection.org " The most common way people give up their power is by thinking they don't have any " : Alice Walker >Dear Marcia, Thank you for your thoughtful response! Just wondering what planet you would live on that would encourage no monetary compensation for farming? Sorry my friend but the train has left the station and because we are going green in the U.S. that also means using green ingredients. In a perfect world everything would be farmed organic but you and I both know that probably will not happen any time soon. You mentioned that looking for organic replacements for synthetic chemical pesticides grossly overlooks the fact that what is really necessary is to learn an entirely different method of farming. True, I agree with this but synthetic chemicals are killing us, bottom line! So do you think it would be more probable to use biopesticides or revolutionize the whole agricultural industry? I take your criticisms lightly and do not put much weight on the fact that you would not get overly vested in sales of large quantities of oils to farms. Farmers do not buy in 5ml bottles so don't worry about that. Stick to what you know---Aromatherapy! Be well, Rachel Markel Managing Partner eoilco labs www.eoilco.com www.eoilcolab.com www.GreenTerpene.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2009 Report Share Posted May 22, 2009 GO Marcia! Joanie _____ ATFE2 [ATFE2 ] On Behalf Of Marcia Elston Friday, May 22, 2009 2:07 PM ATFE2 RE: [ATFE2] Re: Agricultural aromatherapy Rachel, somehow I knew you would misunderstand my reference to monetary compensation . . . hence the second post clarification. And, whoa . . . You know nothing about me, certainly not my acquired knowledge in the aromatic products trade industry beyond aromatherapy, let alone the breadth of our business. If you knew more about our company, you would know that we have been sourcing essential oils worldwide from producers for going on 20 years; we broker and distribute some raw aromatics in quantity; we've developed large manufacturing projects for companies like Costco and Longs Drug, as well as operate retail online and wholesale. Our retail website is just one component, and I don't feel a need to wave an online accomplishment flag for relationships that have developed outside the internet and have nothing to do with our retail online entity. I am passionate about the issues confronting us and I am closely connected to and communicate frequently with other thoughtful researchers who also keep abreast. I've known Martin Watt for a couple of decades now and know the integrity of his work. None of us entirely agree with one another, but we are engaged in a collective effort to identify problems and present possible solutions. If you have taken time to examine the efforts at websites like aromaconnection, cropwatch, springerlink and others, you already know this. I'm not the only one put off by your condescending attitude on this list, and I'm a bit puzzled by it. Are you here to learn more and contribute to issues surrounding aromatherapy (and frequently the larger issues of EO trade) or has someone licked all the red off your candy and you are here simply to bully? The only posts I've seen from you seem to indicate a chip on your shoulder. What can be done to remedy this? I believe you might have a lot to contribute if you wouldn't appear take things so personally. All I expect is a rational, factual viewpoint from anyone I have discussions with, and you can be expected to be challenged if your facts aren't straight, if not by me, then by someone else. This is the way it works. If you agree that organic methods are the answer, then why would you persist to champion that pesticides in any form should be continued and what makes you believe that essential oils are safer? The examples you cited are not good ones, as I carefully pointed out. So long as people agree (like you) that things cannot change for the better anytime soon, it will take longer for necessary changes to occur. I am not naïve and I do not expect magical overnight changes, but I do believe in pushing for changes, certainly those to reverse the devastation we all agree has been wreaked by the chemical industry. I see your point that essential oils are perhaps less dangerous, but are they really, in this context? I challenge you to provide real documented evidence that essential oils as pesticides are any less damaging than their synthetic chemical counterparts when poured in great quantities into a particular ecosystem. And, don't you get it that " organic pesticide " is a complete oxymoron? " Going Green " has been co-opted by so many corporations trying to compete with a grass roots movement to reverse the trend to synthesize and manipulate everything natural . . . I admit that I was totally put off by your waving of that banner, especially without intelligent substance. Be Well, Marcia Elston, Samara Botane/Nature Intelligence http://www.wingedse <http://www.wingedseed.com> ed.com http://www.aromacon <http://www.aromaconnection.org> nection.org " The most common way people give up their power is by thinking they don't have any " : Alice Walker >Dear Marcia, Thank you for your thoughtful response! Just wondering what planet you would live on that would encourage no monetary compensation for farming? Sorry my friend but the train has left the station and because we are going green in the U.S. that also means using green ingredients. In a perfect world everything would be farmed organic but you and I both know that probably will not happen any time soon. You mentioned that looking for organic replacements for synthetic chemical pesticides grossly overlooks the fact that what is really necessary is to learn an entirely different method of farming. True, I agree with this but synthetic chemicals are killing us, bottom line! So do you think it would be more probable to use biopesticides or revolutionize the whole agricultural industry? I take your criticisms lightly and do not put much weight on the fact that you would not get overly vested in sales of large quantities of oils to farms. Farmers do not buy in 5ml bottles so don't worry about that. Stick to what you know---Aromatherapy! Be well, Rachel Markel Managing Partner eoilco labs www.eoilco.com www.eoilcolab.com www.GreenTerpene.com Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.34/2121 - Release 05/22/09 06:03:00 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 24, 2009 Report Share Posted May 24, 2009 Although I am only someone who makes my own products as a hobby I will applaud Marcia for her posts. I have only been studying natural products for a few years and although I prefer creating something with simple, basic ingredients, I am not one to make such a broad statement that synthetics are killing us. There is good and bad in all things- " natural " is not an automatic ticket to healthy. And although being as environmentally concious as possible is what we all should strive for, Marcia did clarify her statement and made her points quite well. She's right-the condescending attitude is a put off. Susan ATFE2 , " Marcia Elston " <Marcia wrote: > > Rachel, somehow I knew you would misunderstand my reference to monetary > compensation . . . hence the second post clarification. > > And, whoa . . . You know nothing about me, certainly not my acquired > knowledge in the aromatic products trade industry beyond aromatherapy, let > alone the breadth of our business. If you knew more about our company, you > would know that we have been sourcing essential oils worldwide from > producers for going on 20 years; we broker and distribute some raw aromatics > in quantity; we've developed large manufacturing projects for companies like > Costco and Longs Drug, as well as operate retail online and wholesale. Our > retail website is just one component, and I don't feel a need to wave an > online accomplishment flag for relationships that have developed outside the > internet and have nothing to do with our retail online entity. I am > passionate about the issues confronting us and I am closely connected to and > communicate frequently with other thoughtful researchers who also keep > abreast. I've known Martin Watt for a couple of decades now and know the > integrity of his work. None of us entirely agree with one another, but we > are engaged in a collective effort to identify problems and present possible > solutions. If you have taken time to examine the efforts at websites like > aromaconnection, cropwatch, springerlink and others, you already know this. > > > I'm not the only one put off by your condescending attitude on this list, > and I'm a bit puzzled by it. Are you here to learn more and contribute to > issues surrounding aromatherapy (and frequently the larger issues of EO > trade) or has someone licked all the red off your candy and you are here > simply to bully? The only posts I've seen from you seem to indicate a chip > on your shoulder. What can be done to remedy this? I believe you might > have a lot to contribute if you wouldn't appear take things so personally. > All I expect is a rational, factual viewpoint from anyone I have discussions > with, and you can be expected to be challenged if your facts aren't > straight, if not by me, then by someone else. This is the way it works. > > If you agree that organic methods are the answer, then why would you persist > to champion that pesticides in any form should be continued and what makes > you believe that essential oils are safer? The examples you cited are not > good ones, as I carefully pointed out. So long as people agree (like you) > that things cannot change for the better anytime soon, it will take longer > for necessary changes to occur. I am not naïve and I do not expect magical > overnight changes, but I do believe in pushing for changes, certainly those > to reverse the devastation we all agree has been wreaked by the chemical > industry. I see your point that essential oils are perhaps less dangerous, > but are they really, in this context? I challenge you to provide real > documented evidence that essential oils as pesticides are any less damaging > than their synthetic chemical counterparts when poured in great quantities > into a particular ecosystem. And, don't you get it that " organic pesticide " > is a complete oxymoron? > > " Going Green " has been co-opted by so many corporations trying to compete > with a grass roots movement to reverse the trend to synthesize and > manipulate everything natural . . . I admit that I was totally put off by > your waving of that banner, especially without intelligent substance. > > Be Well, > Marcia Elston, Samara Botane/Nature Intelligence > http://www.wingedseed.com > http://www.aromaconnection.org > " The most common way people give up their power is by thinking they don't > have any " : Alice Walker > > >Dear Marcia, > > Thank you for your thoughtful response! Just wondering what planet you would > live on that would encourage no monetary compensation for farming? Sorry my > friend but the train has left the station and because we are going green in > the U.S. that also means using green ingredients. In a perfect world > everything would be farmed organic but you and I both know that probably > will not happen any time soon. > > You mentioned that looking for organic replacements for synthetic chemical > pesticides grossly overlooks the fact that what is really > necessary is to learn an entirely different method of farming. True, I agree > with this but synthetic chemicals are killing us, bottom line! So do you > think it would be more probable to use biopesticides or revolutionize the > whole agricultural industry? > > I take your criticisms lightly and do not put much weight on the fact that > you would not get overly vested in sales of large quantities of oils to > farms. Farmers do not buy in 5ml bottles so don't worry about that. Stick to > what you know---Aromatherapy! > > Be well, > > Rachel Markel > Managing Partner > eoilco labs > www.eoilco.com > www.eoilcolab.com > www.GreenTerpene.com > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 26, 2009 Report Share Posted May 26, 2009 susan, Well said. >I am not one to make such a broad statement that synthetics are >killing us. This kind of terminology is typical of those whose prime objective is to sell product. It is used to scare the public into thinking natural is safe and everything synthetic is not. As those that know me understand, I am not trying to promote synthetic products over naturals. We just need to educate as many as we can that not everything can be replaced with naturals. In particular, production of certain essential oils such as Indonesian sandalwood and rosewood are devastating to the environment and to indigenous tribes way of life. This is far worse than using a safe synthetic equivalent. If essential oils were more commonly used as agro pesticides, my bet is the production of semi synthetic oils would go through the roof as I see no way they can be produced on-mass for such purposes. I expect the deforested plantations in Indonesia, Brazil and Madagascar would turn over to growing aromatic plants and the soils would be loaded with synthetic fertilisers. So what would be the gain long term? This is no different to the orange groves in South American countries, all grown on deforested land loaded with artificial fertilisers and the oil sold by many aromatherapy suppliers as " organically grown " !!!! Martin Watt ATFE2 , " susan " <ripple95 wrote: > > Although I am only someone who makes my own products as a hobby I will applaud Marcia for her posts. I have only been studying natural products for a few years and although I prefer creating something with simple, basic ingredients, I am not one to make such a broad statement that synthetics are killing us. There is good and bad in all things- " natural " is not an automatic ticket to healthy. And although being as environmentally concious as possible is what we all should strive for, Marcia did clarify her statement and made her points quite well. She's right-the condescending attitude is a put off. Susan > > > ATFE2 , " Marcia Elston " <Marcia@> wrote: > > > > Rachel, somehow I knew you would misunderstand my reference to monetary > > compensation . . . hence the second post clarification. > > > > And, whoa . . . You know nothing about me, certainly not my acquired > > knowledge in the aromatic products trade industry beyond aromatherapy, let > > alone the breadth of our business. If you knew more about our company, you > > would know that we have been sourcing essential oils worldwide from > > producers for going on 20 years; we broker and distribute some raw aromatics > > in quantity; we've developed large manufacturing projects for companies like > > Costco and Longs Drug, as well as operate retail online and wholesale. Our > > retail website is just one component, and I don't feel a need to wave an > > online accomplishment flag for relationships that have developed outside the > > internet and have nothing to do with our retail online entity. I am > > passionate about the issues confronting us and I am closely connected to and > > communicate frequently with other thoughtful researchers who also keep > > abreast. I've known Martin Watt for a couple of decades now and know the > > integrity of his work. None of us entirely agree with one another, but we > > are engaged in a collective effort to identify problems and present possible > > solutions. If you have taken time to examine the efforts at websites like > > aromaconnection, cropwatch, springerlink and others, you already know this. > > > > > > I'm not the only one put off by your condescending attitude on this list, > > and I'm a bit puzzled by it. Are you here to learn more and contribute to > > issues surrounding aromatherapy (and frequently the larger issues of EO > > trade) or has someone licked all the red off your candy and you are here > > simply to bully? The only posts I've seen from you seem to indicate a chip > > on your shoulder. What can be done to remedy this? I believe you might > > have a lot to contribute if you wouldn't appear take things so personally. > > All I expect is a rational, factual viewpoint from anyone I have discussions > > with, and you can be expected to be challenged if your facts aren't > > straight, if not by me, then by someone else. This is the way it works. > > > > If you agree that organic methods are the answer, then why would you persist > > to champion that pesticides in any form should be continued and what makes > > you believe that essential oils are safer? The examples you cited are not > > good ones, as I carefully pointed out. So long as people agree (like you) > > that things cannot change for the better anytime soon, it will take longer > > for necessary changes to occur. I am not naïve and I do not expect magical > > overnight changes, but I do believe in pushing for changes, certainly those > > to reverse the devastation we all agree has been wreaked by the chemical > > industry. I see your point that essential oils are perhaps less dangerous, > > but are they really, in this context? I challenge you to provide real > > documented evidence that essential oils as pesticides are any less damaging > > than their synthetic chemical counterparts when poured in great quantities > > into a particular ecosystem. And, don't you get it that " organic pesticide " > > is a complete oxymoron? > > > > " Going Green " has been co-opted by so many corporations trying to compete > > with a grass roots movement to reverse the trend to synthesize and > > manipulate everything natural . . . I admit that I was totally put off by > > your waving of that banner, especially without intelligent substance. > > > > Be Well, > > Marcia Elston, Samara Botane/Nature Intelligence > > http://www.wingedseed.com > > http://www.aromaconnection.org > > " The most common way people give up their power is by thinking they don't > > have any " : Alice Walker > > > > >Dear Marcia, > > > > Thank you for your thoughtful response! Just wondering what planet you would > > live on that would encourage no monetary compensation for farming? Sorry my > > friend but the train has left the station and because we are going green in > > the U.S. that also means using green ingredients. In a perfect world > > everything would be farmed organic but you and I both know that probably > > will not happen any time soon. > > > > You mentioned that looking for organic replacements for synthetic chemical > > pesticides grossly overlooks the fact that what is really > > necessary is to learn an entirely different method of farming. True, I agree > > with this but synthetic chemicals are killing us, bottom line! So do you > > think it would be more probable to use biopesticides or revolutionize the > > whole agricultural industry? > > > > I take your criticisms lightly and do not put much weight on the fact that > > you would not get overly vested in sales of large quantities of oils to > > farms. Farmers do not buy in 5ml bottles so don't worry about that. Stick to > > what you know---Aromatherapy! > > > > Be well, > > > > Rachel Markel > > Managing Partner > > eoilco labs > > www.eoilco.com > > www.eoilcolab.com > > www.GreenTerpene.com > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.