Guest guest Posted December 3, 2002 Report Share Posted December 3, 2002 C for Yourself <rusty wrote:Tuesday, December 3, 2002 Dear Newsletter rs, Thanks for your interest in Cforyourself. I hope you find this occasional newsletter informative and interesting. To view old messages or to , go to the link at the bottom of this e-mail. I received an e-mail from Doctor’s Guide yesterday that reported on a study presented at the American Heart Association’s 2002 Scientific Sessions regarding cholesterol and the “Atkins” diet. The first sentence of the article states “Obese patients who followed a high-fat, low-carbohydrate " Atkins diet " for six months lost more weight and experienced more significant favourable changes in lipid profiles than did those who tried a low-fat diet for six months, according to one study.” The conventional wisdom that a low fat diet is imperative to avoid heart disease has greatly changed the eating habits of millions of Americans. One need look no further than the huge number of products that proclaim “low fat” to appreciate how well established this thinking is. It seems to me that if the aim of the low fat diet is to lower cholesterol or, as the article puts it “favourable changes in lipid profiles”, the last outcome we would expect from a high fat, high protein diet would be favorable results. And yet that is precisely what happened. So what is the message we should take from this? Other than “cholesterol levels don’t matter much” (a debate for another time), surely we could suspect that the promoted low fat diet approach may be wrong. I think so. Our body’s metabolic processes determine our serum cholesterol levels, in their various forms, for reasons. It would appear that lowering your cholesterol level is a more complex situation than merely lowering the fat content of your diet. The famous “Framingham” study confirmed this. The Bolen Report (www.bolenreport.com) states: " At Framingham, we found that the people who ate the most saturated fat, the most cholesterol and the most calories weighed the least, were more physically active and had the lowest serum cholesterol levels. " (emphasis mine) - William Castelli, M.D., Director of the Framingham Study. The Archives of Internal Medicine, July 1992, Vol. 152, pages 1371-72. Food for thought. Your comments are always encouraged and appreciated. Here's to your health from Cforyourself, Rusty ------------ This Cforyourself newsletter is an occasional publication of cforyourself.com. We appreciate your participation. Send correspondence to rusty To view old messages or to , go to the link at the bottom of this e-mail. Cforyourself: Vitamin C for Optimum Health http://www.cforyourself.com _____________________ Gettingwell- / Vitamins, Herbs, Aminos, etc. To , e-mail to: Gettingwell- Or, go to our group site: Gettingwell Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.