Guest guest Posted April 10, 2007 Report Share Posted April 10, 2007 --- <simpleisbest wrote: >In " A xxxxx Pocket Full of Money " the author says not to >use " want " since it is a future based word that comes out of >neediness. Well, I do disagree and here is why I disagree. Most people are WRONG on Attracting Abundance, are YOU? I disagree because of my training and because of my positive and very successful money making experiences using the Laws of Abundance. People start where they start. And most people start with a " want " which definds a " neglect " . That's why they want something. They don't have it. If they had it they wouldn't want it nor need it. Once they've found out the reasons behind the " neglect " they can easily erase that negative energy perturbance (s)... ....and then install the positive attractor fields. If you don't know how to do the above quickly and easily, then get the " Inner Demon Destroyer " . It is cheap and it works wonders. Until April 15, anyone here can pick up that $497 course for $249. Fair? >It is best to use only present tense language to get better >results. Actually that is incorrect, though it might work for you and it might work for a few others. The best place to start is with the present progressive tense. The " ing " word. Both the conscious mind and the subconsciou mind can more easily accepting the " ing " phrase. ie, " I am earning $250,000 per year " . " I am standing on my scales, looking at the numbers and they say 185 pounds " . In fact I have a complete course on " Secrets of Covert Hypnosis " that goes over that it fine detail so that you can use affirmations that are a minimum of 1,000 times more powerful that what Ponder teaches in her books. Secrets of Covert Hypnosis is normally $897. You can pick it up intil April 15 for only $497. Fair? >I also think focusing on things isn't the best way to go. Well, if you actually want something, then you need some type of goal orientation so you'll know when you get it, or not. If someone weighs 230 pounds and wants " to weight 200 pounds, they need to know that and have a positive emotional attachment to that. And once the WANT is powerful enough ANY means of getting/achieving it will work, presupposing it is a functional method. > It is best to address the reason for blocking abundance to begin >with. No it's NOT. It is best to see if they do have any Psychological Reversals about what they WANT. If they do, you clean them up. It'll take maybe 20 minutes to about an hour, that's it! Then you install the attributes that will take them to where they want to go. A fairly easy and simple process ONCE you know how. And it is all cover in compete easy to understand details on the " Inner Demon Destroyer " . >There are no shortcuts. Really? How about a freeway? I mean there is really NO reason to have someone attempt to tramp through the forest with a machete, attempting to find their own way to successful manifestation. I suggest you do NOT build in limitation and hardship as a solution. There are very effective " verbal maps " that are very successful. In fact in my DVD set " Secrets of the Oceans of Money and the MONEY MAGNET " I go over most of them, teaching them to a very smart group of people that really do " get shit done " . Many people on this group have used the above very effectively. If you want to look at it, go to www.mentaltrainingsecrets.com. And if you are a member here, Jack Williams will give you one hell of a discount until April 15, then it is gone for good. You can have it for $897 instead of the $1,997 price tag. Fair? If you need a payment schedule, let me or Jack Williams know. Ph.D. Columbia Pacific University 1987 Silva UltraMind ESP Remote Viewing/Remote INFLUENCING co-developer 2003, Huna Trainer & Kumu since 1998 Master Trainer and Coach of NLP since 1983 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.