Guest guest Posted December 29, 2004 Report Share Posted December 29, 2004 Let's tell it like it truly is. I'm not holding it in anymore, can't, my soul won't/can't " allow " it. AMA - AMERCIAN MURDER ASSOCIATION WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION = WORLD DEATH ORGANIZATION U.N. = Un-united Nations http://www.909shot.com http://www.vac-lib.org http://www.notmilk.com http://www.themeatrix.com http://www.drday.com http://www.drrath.com http://www.friendsoffreedom.org .......and that's just a start. READ: Guylaine Lanctot: The Medical Mafia READ: Eustach Mullins: Murder by Injection Oh, and your tax dollars support this insanity. Pray for the day they get led away in chains. No more " I was just following orders " ...come clean now or.....we know your methods and we are exposing you. MOtto of the AMA: " A patient cured is a customer lost. " Lots of natural doctors cure diabetes. FOR NON HEALING WOUNDS see my good friends in Hamilton Ontario, probably the most reasonable cost for hyperbarics on the planet, and Death Canada supresses them ongoingly....www.reimerhbo.com I JUST HSAKE MY HEAD AT THE ATROCITIES. TIME TO ACT. sove rain --- " 121 " <121 wrote: > Our Deadly Diabetes Deception > Greed and dishonest science have promoted a > lucrative worldwide epidemic of > diabetes that honesty and good science can quickly > reverse by naturally > restoring the body's blood-sugar control mechanism. > > ---------- > ---- > > Extracted from Nexus Magazine, Volume 11, Number 4 > (June-July 2004) > PO Box 30, Mapleton Qld 4560 Australia. > editor > Telephone: +61 (0)7 5442 9280; Fax: +61 (0)7 5442 > 9381 > From our web page at: www.nexusmagazine.com > > by Thomas Smith © 2004 > PO Box 7685 > Loveland, CO 80537 USA > Email: Valley > Website: http://www.Healingmatters.com > > > ---------- > ---- > > Introduction > If you are an American diabetic, your physician will > never tell you that > most cases of diabetes are curable. In fact, if you > even mention the " cure " > word around him, he will likely become upset and > irrational. His medical > school training only allows him to respond to the > word " treatment " . For him, > the " cure " word does not exist. Diabetes, in its > modern epidemic form, is a > curable disease and has been for at least 40 years. > In 2001, the most recent > year for which US figures are posted, 934,550 > Americans died from > out-of-control symptoms of this disease.1 > Your physician will also never tell you that, at one > time, strokes, both > ischaemic and haemorrhagic, heart failure due to > neuropathy as well as both > ischaemic and haemorrhagic coronary events, obesity, > atherosclerosis, > elevated blood pressure, elevated cholesterol, > elevated triglycerides, > impotence, retinopathy, renal failure, liver > failure, polycystic ovary > syndrome, elevated blood sugar, systemic candida, > impaired carbohydrate > metabolism, poor wound healing, impaired fat > metabolism, peripheral > neuropathy as well as many more of today's > disgraceful epidemic disorders > were once well understood often to be but symptoms > of diabetes. > If you contract diabetes and depend upon orthodox > medical treatment, sooner > or later you will experience one or more of its > symptoms as the disease > rapidly worsens. It is now common practice to refer > to these symptoms as if > they were separable, independent diseases with > separate, unrelated > treatments provided by competing medical > specialists. > It is true that many of these symptoms can and > sometimes do result from > other causes; however, it is also true that this > fact has been used to > disguise the causative role of diabetes and to > justify expensive, > ineffective treatments for these symptoms. > Epidemic Type II diabetes is curable. By the time > you get to the end of this > article, you are going to know that. You're going to > know why it isn't > routinely being cured. And, you're going to know how > to cure it. You are > also probably going to be angry at what a handful of > greedy people have > surreptitiously done to the entire orthodox medical > community and to its > trusting patients. > The Diabetes Industry > Today's diabetes industry is a massive community > that has grown step by step > from its dubious origins in the early 20th century. > In the last 80 years it > has become enormously successful at shutting out > competitive voices that > attempt to point out the fraud involved in modern > diabetes treatment. It has > matured into a religion. And, like all religions, it > depends heavily upon > the faith of the believer. So successful has it > become that it verges on > blasphemy to suggest that, in most cases, the kindly > high priest with the > stethoscope draped prominently around his neck is a > charlatan and a fraud. > In the large majority of cases, he has never cured a > single case of diabetes > in his entire medical career. > The financial and political influence of this > medical community has almost > totally subverted the original intent of our > regulatory agencies. They > routinely approve death-dealing, ineffective drugs > with insufficient > testing. Former commissioner of the FDA, Dr Herbert > Ley, in testimony before > a US Senate hearing, commented: " People think the > FDA is protecting them. It > isn't. What the FDA is doing and what the public > thinks it's doing are as > different as night and day. " 2 > The financial and political influence of this > medical community dominates > our entire medical insurance industry. Although this > is beginning to change, > in America it is still difficult to find employer > group medical insurance to > cover effective alternative medical treatments. > Orthodox coverage is > standard in all states. Alternative medicine is not. > For example, there are > only 1,400 licensed naturopaths in 11 states > compared to over 3.4 million > orthodox licensees in 50 states.3 Generally, only > approved treatments from > licensed, credentialled practitioners are insurable. > This, in effect, neatly > creates a special kind of money that can only be > spent within the orthodox > medical and drug industry. No other industry in the > world has been able to > manage the politics of convincing people to accept > so large a part of their > pay in a form that often does not allow them to > spend it as they see fit. > The financial and political influence of this > medical community completely > controls virtually every diabetes publication in the > country. Many diabetes > publications are subsidised by ads for diabetes > supplies. No diabetes editor > is going to allow the truth to be printed in his > magazine. This is why the > diabetic only pays about one-quarter to one-third of > the cost of printing > the magazine he depends upon for accurate > information. The rest is > subsidised by diabetes manufacturers with a vested > commercial interest in > preventing diabetics from curing their diabetes. > When looking for a magazine > that tells the truth about diabetes, look first to > see if it is full of ads > for diabetes supplies. > And then there are the various associations that > solicit annual donations to > find a cure for their proprietary disease. Every > year they promise that a > cure is just around the corner-just send more money! > Some of these very same > associations have been clearly implicated in > providing advice that promotes > the progress of diabetes in their trusting > supporters. For example, for > years they heavily promoted exchange diets,4 which > are in fact > scientifically worthless-as anyone who has ever > tried to use them quickly > finds out. They ridiculed the use of glycaemic > tables, which are actually > very helpful to the diabetic. They promoted the use > of margarine as heart > healthy, long after it was well understood that > margarine causes diabetes > and promotes heart failure.5 > If people ever wake up to the cure for diabetes that > has been suppressed for > 40 years, these associations will soon be out of > business. But until then, > they nonetheless continue to need our support. > For 40 years, medical research has consistently > shown with increasing > clarity that diabetes is a degenerative disease > directly caused by an > engineered food supply that is focused on profit > instead of health. Although > the diligent can readily glean this information from > a wealth of medical > research literature, it is generally otherwise > unavailable. Certainly this > information has been, and remains, largely > unavailable in the medical > schools that train our retail doctors. > Prominent among the causative agents in our modern > diabetes epidemic are the > engineered fats and oils that are sold in today's > supermarkets. > The first step to curing diabetes is to stop > believing the lie that the > disease is incurable. > > Diabetes History > In 1922, three Canadian Nobel Prize winners, > Banting, Best and Macleod, were > successful in saving the life of a fourteen-year-old > diabetic girl in > Toronto General Hospital with injectable insulin.6 > Eli Lilly was licensed to > manufacture this new wonder drug, and the medical > community basked in the > glory of a job well done. > It wasn't until 1933 that rumours about a new rogue > form of diabetes > surfaced. This was in a paper presented by Joslyn, > Dublin and Marks and > printed in the American Journal of Medical Sciences. > This paper, " Studies on > Diabetes Mellitus " ,7 discussed the emergence of a > major epidemic of a > disease which looked very much like the diabetes of > the early 1920s, only it > did not respond to the wonder drug, insulin. Even > worse, sometimes insulin > treatment killed the patient. > This new disease became known as " insulin-resistant > diabetes " because it had > the elevated blood sugar symptom of diabetes but > responded poorly to insulin > therapy. Many physicians had considerable success in > treating this disease > through diet. A great deal was learned about the > relationship between diet > and diabetes in the 1930s and 1940s. > Diabetes, which had a per-capita incidence of > 0.0028% at the turn of the > century, had by 1933 zoomed 1,000% in the United > States to become a disease > seen by many doctors.8 This disease, under a variety > of aliases, was > destined to go on to wreck the health of over half > the American population > and incapacitate almost 20% by the 1990s.9 > In 1950, the medical community became able to > perform serum insulin assays. > These assays quickly revealed that this new disease > wasn't classic diabetes; > it was characterised by sufficient, often excessive, > blood insulin levels. > The problem was that the insulin was ineffective; it > did not reduce blood > sugar. But since the disease had been known as > diabetes for almost 20 years, > it was renamed Type II diabetes. This was to > distinguish it from the earlier > Type I diabetes, caused by insufficient insulin > production by the pancreas. > Had the dietary insights of the previous 20 years > dominated the medical > scene from this point and into the late 1960s, > diabetes would have become > widely recognised as curable instead of merely > treatable. Instead, in 1950, > a search was launched for another wonder drug to > deal with the Type II > diabetes problem. > > Cure versus Treatment > This new, ideal, wonder drug would be effective, > like insulin, in remitting > obvious adverse symptoms of the disease but not > effective in curing the > underlying disease. Thus it would be needed > continually for the remaining > life of the patient. It would have to be patentable; > that is, it could not > be a natural medication because these are > non-patentable. Like insulin, it > would have to be highly profitable to manufacture > and distribute. Mandatory > government approvals would be required to stimulate > physicians to prescribe > it as a prescription drug. Testing required for > these approvals would have > to be enormously expensive to prevent other, > unapproved, medications from > becoming competitive. > This is the origin of the classic medical protocol > of " treating the > symptoms " . By doing this, both the drug company and > the doctor could prosper > in business, and the patient, while not being cured > of his disease, was > sometimes temporarily relieved of some of his > symptoms. > Additionally, natural medications that actually > cured disease would have to > be suppressed. The more effective they were, the > more they would need to be > suppressed and their proponents jailed as quacks. > After all, it wouldn't do > to have some cheap, effective, natural medication > cure disease in a > capital-intensive monopoly market specifically > designed to treat symptoms > without curing disease. > Often the natural substance really did cure disease. > This is why the force > of law has been and is being used to drive the > natural, often superior, > medicines from the marketplace, to remove the " cure " > word from the medical > vocabulary and to undermine totally the very concept > of a free marketplace > in the medical business. > Now it is clear why the " cure " word is so vigorously > suppressed by law. The > FDA has extensive Orwellian regulations that > prohibit the use of the " cure " > word to describe any competing medicine or natural > substance. It is > precisely because many natural substances do > actually both cure and prevent > disease that this word has become so frightening to > the drug and orthodox > medical community. > > The Commercial Value of Symptoms > After the drug development policy was redesigned to > focus on ameliorating > symptoms rather than curing disease, it became > necessary to reinvent the way > drugs were marketed. This was done in 1949 in the > midst of a major epidemic > of insulin-resistant diabetes. > So, in 1949, the US medical community reclassified > the symptoms of > diabetes10 along with many other disease symptoms > into diseases in their own > right. With this reclassification as the new basis > for diagnosis, competing > medical speciality groups quickly seized upon > related groups of symptoms as > their own proprietary symptoms set. > Thus the heart specialist, endocrinologist, > allergist, kidney specialist and > many others started to treat the symptoms for which > they felt responsible. > As the underlying cause of the disease was widely > ignored, all focus on > actually curing anything was completely lost. > Heart failure, for example, which had previously > been understood often to be > but a symptom of diabetes, now became a disease not > directly connected to > diabetes. It became fashionable to think that > diabetes " increased > cardiovascular risk " . The causal role of a failed > blood-sugar control system > in heart failure became obscured. > Consistent with the new medical paradigm, none of > the treatments offered by > the heart specialist actually cures, or is even > intended to cure, their > proprietary disease. For example, the three-year > survival rate for bypass > surgery is almost exactly the same as if no surgery > was undertaken.11 > Today, over half of the people in America suffer > from one or more symptoms > of this disease. In its beginnings, it became well > known to physicians as > Type II diabetes, insulin-resistant diabetes, > insulin resistance, > adult-onset diabetes or, more rarely, > hyperinsulinaemia. > According to the American Heart Association, almost > 50% of Americans suffer > from one or more symptoms of this disease. One third > of the US population is > morbidly obese; half of the population is > overweight. Type II diabetes, also > called adult-onset diabetes, now appears routinely > in six-year-old children. > Many degenerative diseases can be traced to a > massive failure of the > endocrine system. This was well known to the > physicians of the 1930s as > insulin-resistant diabetes. This basic underlying > disorder is known to be a > derangement of the blood-sugar control system by > badly engineered fats and > oils. It is exacerbated and complicated by the > widespread lack of other > essential nutrition that the body needs to cope with > the metabolic > consequences of these poisons. > All fats and oils are not equal. Some are healthy > and beneficial; many, > commonly available in the supermarket, are > poisonous. The health distinction > is not between saturated and unsaturated, as the > fats and oils industry > would have us believe. Many saturated oils and fats > are highly beneficial; > many unsaturated oils are highly poisonous. The > important health distinction > is between natural and engineered. > There exists great dishonesty in advertising in the > fats and oils industry. > It is aimed at creating a market for cheap junk oils > such as soy, cottonseed > and rapeseed oils. > With an informed and aware public, these oils would > have no market at all, > and the USA-indeed, the world-would have far fewer > cases of diabetes. > > > Epidemiological Lifestyle Link > As early as 1901, efforts had been made to > manufacture and sell food > products by the use of automated factory machinery > because of the immense > profits that were possible. Most of the early > efforts failed because people > were inherently suspicious of food that wasn't farm > fresh and because the > technology was poor. As long as people were > prosperous, suspicious food > products made little headway. Crisco,12 the > artificial shortening, was once > given away free in 21?2 lb cans in an unsuccessful > effort to influence > American housewives to trust and buy the product in > preference to lard. > Margarine was introduced and was bitterly opposed by > the dairy states in the > USA. With the advent of the Depression of the 1930s, > margarine, Crisco and a > host of other refined and hydrogenated products > began to make significant > penetration into the food markets of America. > Support for dairy opposition > to margarine faded during World War II because there > wasn't enough butter > for the needs of both the civilian population and > the military.13 At this > point, the dairy industry, having lost much support, > simply accepted a > diluted market share and concentrated on supplying > the military. > Flax oils and fish oils, which were common in the > stores and considered > dietary staples before the American population > became diseased, have > disappeared from the shelf. The last supplier of > flax oil to the major > distribution chains was Archer Daniels Midland, and > it stopped producing and > supplying the product in 1950. > More recently, one of the most important of the > remaining, genuinely > beneficial, fats was subjected to a massive media > disinformation campaign > that portrayed it as a saturated fat that causes > heart failure. As a result, > it has virtually disappeared from the supermarket > shelves. Thus was coconut > oil removed from the food chain and replaced with > soy oil, cottonseed oil > and rapeseed oil.14 Our parents and grandparents > would never have swapped a > fine, healthy oil like coconut oil for these cheap, > junk oils. It was > shortly after this successful media blitz that the > US populace lost its war > on fat. For many years, coconut oil had been our > most effective dietary > weight-control agent. > The history of the engineered adulteration of our > once-clean food supply > exactly parallels the rise of the epidemic of > diabetes and hyperinsulinaemia > now sweeping the United States as well as much of > the rest of the world. > The second step to a cure for this disease epidemic > is to stop believing the > lie that our food supply is safe and nutritious. > > The Nature of the Disease > Diabetes is classically diagnosed as a failure of > the body to metabolise > carbohydrates properly. Its defining symptom is a > high blood-glucose level. > Type I diabetes results from insufficient insulin > production by the > pancreas. Type II diabetes results from ineffective > insulin. In both types, > the blood-glucose level remains elevated. Neither > insufficient insulin nor > ineffective insulin can limit post-prandial > (after-eating) blood sugar to > the normal range. In established cases of Type II > diabetes, these elevated > blood sugar levels are often preceded and > accompanied by chronically > elevated insulin levels and by serious distortions > of other endocrine > hormonal markers. > The ineffective insulin is no different from > effective insulin. Its > ineffectiveness lies in the failure of the cell > population to respond to it. > It is not the result of any biochemical defect in > the insulin itself. > Therefore, it is appropriate to note that this is a > disease that affects > almost every cell in the 70 trillion or so cells of > the body. All of these > cells are dependent upon the food that we eat for > the raw materials they > need for self repair and maintenance. > The classification of diabetes as a failure to > metabolise carbohydrates is a > traditional classification that originated in the > early 19th century when > little was known about metabolic diseases or > processes.15 Today, with our > increased knowledge of these processes, it would > appear quite appropriate to > define Type II diabetes more fundamentally as a > failure of the body to > metabolise fats and oils properly. This failure > results in a loss of > effectiveness of insulin and in the consequent > failure to metabolise > carbohydrates. Unfortunately, much medical insight > into this matter, except > at the research level, remains hampered by its > 19th-century legacy. > Thus Type II diabetes and its early > hyperinsulinaemic symptoms are > whole-body symptoms of this basic cellular failure > to metabolise glucose > properly. Each cell of the body, for reasons which > are becoming clearer, > finds itself unable to transport glucose from the > bloodstream to its > interior. The glucose then remains in the > bloodstream, or is stored as body > fat or as glycogen, or is otherwise disposed of in > urine. > It appears that when insulin binds to a cell > membrane receptor, it initiates > a complex cascade of biochemical reactions inside > the cell. This causes a > class of glucose transporters known as GLUT4 > molecules to leave their > parking area inside the cell and travel to the > inside surface of the plasma > cell membrane. > When in the membrane, they migrate to special areas > of the membrane called > caveolae areas.16 There, by another series of > biochemical reactions, they > identify and hook up with glucose molecules and > transport them into the > interior of the cell by a process called > endocytosis. Within the cell's > interior, this glucose is then burned as fuel by the > mitochondria to produce > energy to power cellular activity. Thus these GLUT4 > transporters lower > glucose in the bloodstream by transporting it out of > the bloodstream into > all the cells of the body. > Many of the molecules involved in these glucose- and > insulin-mediated > pathways are lipids; that is, they are fatty acids. > A healthy plasma cell > membrane, now known to be an active player in the > glucose scenario, contains > a complement of cis-type w=3 unsaturated fatty > acids.17 This makes the > membrane relatively fluid and slippery. When these > cis- fatty acids are > chronically unavailable because of our diet, trans- > fatty acids and short- > and medium-chain saturated fatty acids are > substituted in the cell membrane. > These substitutions make the cellular membrane > stiffer and more sticky, and > inhibit the glucose transport mechanism.18 > Thus, in the absence of sufficient cis omega 3 fatty > acids in our diet, > these fatty acid substitutions take place, the > mobility of the GLUT4 > transporters is diminished, the interior > biochemistry of the cell is changed > and glucose remains elevated in the bloodstream. > Elsewhere in the body, the pancreas secretes excess > insulin, the liver > manufactures fat from the excess sugar, the adipose > cells store excess fat, > the body goes into a high urinary mode, insufficient > cellular energy is > available for bodily activity and the entire > endocrine system becomes > distorted. Eventually, pancreatic failure occurs, > body weight plummets and a > diabetic crisis is precipitated. > Although there remains much work to be done to > elucidate fully all of the > steps in all of these pathways, this clearly marks > the beginning of a > biochemical explanation for the known > epidemiological relationship between > cheap, engineered dietary fats and oils and the > onset of Type II diabetes. > > Orthodox Medical Treatment > After the diagnosis of diabetes, modern orthodox > medical treatment consists > of either oral hypoglycaemic agents or insulin. > > . Oral hypoglycaemic agents > In 1955, oral hypoglycaemic drugs were introduced. > Currently available oral > hypoglycaemic agents fall into five classifications > according to their > biophysical mode of action.19 These classes are: > biguanides; glucosidase > inhibitors; meglitinides; sulphonylureas; and > thiazolidinediones. > The biguanides lower blood sugar in three ways. They > inhibit the normal > release by the liver of its glucose stores, they > interfere with intestinal > absorption of glucose from ingested carbohydrates, > and they are said to > increase peripheral uptake of glucose. > The glucosidase inhibitors are designed to inhibit > the amylase enzymes > produced by the pancreas and which are essential to > the digestion of > carbohydrates. The theory is that if the digestion > of carbohydrates is > inhibited, the blood sugar level cannot be elevated. > The meglitinides are designed to stimulate the > pancreas to produce insulin > in a patient that likely already has an elevated > level of insulin in their > bloodstream. Only rarely does the doctor even > measure the insulin level. > Indeed, these drugs are frequently prescribed > without any knowledge of the > pre-existing insulin level. The fact that an > elevated insulin level is > almost as damaging as an elevated glucose level is > widely ignored. > The sulphonylureas are another pancreatic stimulant > class designed to > stimulate the production of insulin. Serum insulin > determinations are rarely > made by the doctor before he prescribes these drugs. > They are often > prescribed for Type II diabetics, many of whom > already have elevated > ineffective insulin. These drugs are notorious for > causing hypoglycaemia as > a side effect. > The thiazolidinediones are famous for causing liver > cancer. One of them, > Rezulin, was approved in the USA through devious > political infighting, but > failed to get approval in the UK because it was > known to cause liver cancer. > The doctor who had responsibility to approve it at > the FDA refused to do so. > It was only after he was replaced by a more > compliant official that Rezulin > gained approval by the FDA. It went on to kill well > over 100 diabetes > patients and cripple many others before the fight to > get it off the market > was finally won. Rezulin was designed to stimulate > the uptake of glucose > from the bloodstream by the peripheral cells and to > inhibit the normal > secretion of glucose by the liver. The politics of > why this drug ever came > onto market, and then remained in the market for > such an unexplainable > length of time with regulatory agency approval, is > not clear.20 As of April > 2000, lawsuits commenced to clarify this > situation.21 > > . Insulin > Today, insulin is prescribed for both the Type I and > Type II diabetics. > Injectable insulin substitutes for the insulin that > the body no longer > produces. Of course, this treatment, while necessary > for preserving the life > of the Type I diabetic, is highly questionable when > applied to the Type II > diabetic. > It is important to note that neither insulin nor any > of these oral > hypoglycaemic agents exerts any curative action > whatsoever on any type of > diabetes. None of these medical strategies is > designed to normalise the > cellular uptake of glucose by the cells that need it > to power their > activity. > The prognosis with this orthodox treatment is > increasing disability and > early death from heart or kidney failure or the > failure of some other vital > organ. > > Alternative Medical Treatment > The third step to a cure for this disease is to > become informed and to apply > an alternative methodology that is soundly based > upon good science. > Effective alternative treatment that directly leads > to a cure is available > today for some Type I and for many Type II > diabetics. About 5% of the > diabetic population suffers from Type I diabetes; > about 95% has Type II > diabetes.22 Gestational diabetes is simply ordinary > diabetes contracted by a > woman who is pregnant. > For the Type I diabetic, an alternative methodology > for the treatment of > Type I diabetes is now available. It was developed > in modern hospitals in > Madras, India, and subjected to rigorous > double-blind studies to prove its > efficacy.23 It operates to restore normal pancreatic > beta cell function so > that the pancreas can again produce insulin as it > should. This approach > apparently was capable of curing Type I diabetes in > over 60% of the patients > on whom it was tested. The major complication lies > in whether the antigens > that originally led to the autoimmune destruction of > these beta cells have > disappeared from or remain in the body. If they > remain, a cure is less > likely; if they have disappeared, the cure is more > likely. For reasons > already discussed, this methodology is not likely to > appear in the United > States any time soon, and certainly not in the > American orthodox medical > community. > The goal of any effective alternative program is to > repair and restore the > body's own blood-sugar control mechanism. It is the > malfunctioning of this > mechanism that, over time, directly causes all of > the many debilitating > symptoms that make orthodox treatment so financially > rewarding for the > diabetes industry. For Type II diabetes, the steps > in the program are:24 > > . Repair the faulty blood sugar control system. This > is done simply by > substituting clean, healthy, beneficial fats and > oils in the diet for the > pristine-looking but toxic trans-isomer mix found in > attractive plastic > containers on supermarket shelves. Consume only flax > oil, fish oil and > occasionally cod liver oil until blood sugar starts > to stabilise. Then add > back healthy oils such as butter, coconut oil, olive > oil and clean animal > fat. Read labels; refuse to consume cheap junk oils > when they appear in > processed food or on restaurant menus. Diabetics are > chronically short of > minerals; they need to add a good-quality, > broad-spectrum mineral supplement > to the diet. > > . Control blood sugar manually during the recovery > cycle. Under medical > supervision, gradually discontinue all oral > hypoglycaemic agents along with > any additional drugs given to counteract their side > effects. Develop natural > blood-sugar control by the use of glycaemic tables, > by consuming frequent > small meals (including fibre-rich foods), by regular > post-prandial exercise, > and by the complete avoidance of all sugars along > with the judicious use of > only non-toxic sweeteners.25 Avoid alcohol until > blood sugar stabilises in > the normal range. Keep score by using a > pinprick-type glucose meter. Keep > track of everything you do with a medical diary. > > . Restore a proper balance of healthy fats and oils > when the blood sugar > controller again works. Permanently remove from the > diet all cheap, toxic, > junk fats and oils as well as the processed and > restaurant foods that > contain them. When the blood sugar controller again > starts to work > correctly, gradually introduce additional healthy > foods to the diet. Test > the effect of these added foods by monitoring blood > sugar levels with the > pinprick-type blood sugar monitor. Be sure to > include the results of these > tests in your diary also. > > . Continue the program until normal insulin values > are also restored after > blood sugar levels begin to stabilise in the normal > region. Once blood sugar > levels fall into the normal range, the pancreas will > gradually stop > overproducing insulin. This process will typically > take a little longer and > can be tested by having your physician send a sample > of your blood to a lab > for a serum insulin determination. A good idea is to > wait a couple of months > after blood sugar control is restored and then have > your physician check > your insulin level. It's nice to have blood sugar in > the normal range; it's > even nicer to have this accomplished without excess > insulin in the > bloodstream. > > . Separately repair the collateral damage done by > the disease. Vascular > problems caused by a chronically elevated glucose > level will normally > reverse themselves without conscious effort. The > effects of retinopathy and > of peripheral neuropathy, for example, will usually > self repair. However, > when the fine capillaries in the basement membranes > of the kidneys begin to > leak due to chronic high blood glucose, the kidneys > compensate by laying > down scar tissue to prevent the leakage. This scar > tissue remains even after > the diabetes is cured, and is the reason why the > kidney damage is not > believed to self repair. > > A word of warning. When retinopathy develops, there > may be a temptation to > have the damage repaired by laser surgery. This > laser technique stops the > retinal bleeding by creating scar tissue where the > leaks have developed. > This scar tissue will prevent normal healing of the > fine capillaries in the > eye when the diabetes is reversed. By reversing the > diabetes instead of > opting for laser surgery, there is an excellent > chance that the eye will > heal completely. However, if laser surgery is done, > this healing will always > be complicated by the scar tissue left by the laser. > The arterial and vascular damage done by years of > elevated sugar and insulin > and by the proliferation of systemic candida will > slowly reverse due to > improved diet. However, it takes many years to clean > out the arteries by > this form of oral chelation. Arterial damage can be > reversed much more > quickly by using intravenous chelation therapy.26 > What would normally take > many years through diet alone can often be done in > six months with > intravenous therapy. This is reputed to be effective > over 80% of the time. > For obvious reasons, don't expect your doctor to > approve of this, > particularly if he's a heart specialist. > > Recovery Time > The prognosis is usually swift recovery from the > disease and restoration of > normal health and energy levels in a few months to a > year or more. The > length of time that it takes to effect a cure > depends upon how long the > disease was allowed to develop. > For those who work quickly to reverse the disease > after early discovery, the > time is usually a few months or less. For those who > have had the disease for > many years, this recovery time may lengthen to a > year or more. Thus, there > is good reason to get busy reversing this disease as > soon as it becomes > clearly identified. > By the time you get to this point in this article, > and if we've done a good > job of explaining our diabetes epidemic, you should > know what causes it, > what orthodox medical treatment is all about, and > why diabetes has become a > national and international disgrace. > Of even greater importance, you have become > acquainted with a self-help > program that has demonstrated great potential to > actually cure this disease. > ? > > About the Author: > Thomas Smith is a reluctant medical investigator, > having been forced into > curing his own diabetes because it was obvious that > his doctor would not or > could not cure it. > He has published the results of his successful > diabetes investigation in his > self-help manual, Insulin: Our Silent Killer, > written for the layperson but > also widely valued by the medical practitioner. This > manual details the > steps required to reverse Type II diabetes and > references the work being > done with Type I diabetes. The book may be purchased > from the author at PO > Box 7685, Loveland, Colorado 80537, USA (North > American residents send > $US25.00; overseas residents should contact the > author for payment and > shipping instructions). > Thomas Smith has also posted a great deal of useful > information about > diabetes on his website, http://www.Healingmatters. > com. He can be contacted > by telephone at +1 (970) 669 9176 and by email at > valley. > > Endnotes: > 1. National Center for Health Statistics, " Fast > Stats " , Deaths/Mortality > Preliminary 2001 data > 2. Dr Herbert Ley, in response to a question from > Senator Edward Long about > the FDA during US Senate hearings in 1965 > 3. Eisenberg, David M., MD, " Credentialing > complementary and alternative > medical providers " , Annals of Internal Medicine > 137(12):968 (December 17, > 2002) > 4. American Diabetes Association and the American > Dietetic Association, The > Official Pocket Guide to Diabetic Exchanges, > McGraw-Hill/Contemporary > Distributed Products, newly updated March 1, 1998 > 5. American Heart Association, " How Do I Follow a > Healthy Diet? " , American > Heart Association > National Center (7272 Greenville Avenue, Dallas, > Texas 75231-4596, USA), > http://www.americanheart.org > 6. Brown., J.A.C., Pears Medical Encyclopedia > Illustrated, 1971, p. 250 > 7. Joslyn, E.P., Dublin, L.I., Marks, H.H., " Studies > on Diabetes Mellitus " , > American Journal of Medical Sciences 186:753-773 > (1933) > 8. " Diabetes Mellitus " , Encyclopedia Americana, > Library Edition, vol. 9, > 1966, pp. 54-56 > 9. American Heart Association, " Stroke (Brain > Attack) " , August 28, 1998, > http://www.amhrt.org/ScientificHStats98/05stroke.html; > American Heart Association, " Cardiovascular Disease > Statistics " , August 28, > 1998, > http://www.amhrt.org/Heart_and_Stroke_A_Z_Guide/cvds.html; > " Statistics related to overweight and obesity " , > http://niddk.nih.gov/health/nutrit/pubs/statobes.htm; > http://www.winltdusa.com/about/infocenter/ > healthnews/articles/obesestats.htm > 10. " Diabetes Mellitus " , Encyclopedia Americana, > ibid., pp. 54-55 > 11. The Veterans Administration Coronary Artery > Bypass Co-operative Study > Group, " Eleven-year survival in the Veterans > Administration randomized trial > of coronary bypass surgery for stable angina " , New > Eng. J. Med. > 311:1333-1339 (1984); Coronary Artery Surgery Study > (CASS), " A randomized > trial of coronary artery bypass surgery: quality of > life in patients > randomly assigned to treatment groups " , Circulation > 68(5):951-960 (1983) > 12. Trager, J., The Food Chronology, Henry Holt & > Company, New York, 1995 > (items listed by date) > 13. " Margarine " , Encyclopedia Americana, Library > Edition, vol. 9, 1966, pp. > 279-280 > 14. Fallon, S., Connolly, P., Enig, M.C., Nourishing > Traditions, Promotion > Publishing, 1995; > Enig, M.C., " Coconut: In Support of Good Health in > the 21st Century " , > http://www.livecoconutoil.com/maryenig.htm > 15. Houssay, Bernardo, A., MD, et al., Human > Physiology, McGraw-Hill Book > Company, 1955, pp. 400-421 > 16. Gustavson, J., et al., " Insulin-stimulated > glucose uptake involves the > transition of glucose transporters to a > caveolae-rich fraction within the > plasma cell membrane: implications for type II > diabetes " , Mol. Med. > 2(3):367-372 (May 1996) > 17. Ganong, William F., MD, Review of Medical > Physiology, 19th edition, > 1999, p. 9, pp. 26-33 > 18. Pan, D.A. et al., " Skeletal muscle membrane > lipid composition is related > to adiposity and insulin action " , J. Clin. Invest. > 96(6):2802-2808 (December > 1995) > 19. Physicians' Desk Reference, 53rd edition, 1999 > 20. Smith, Thomas, Insulin: Our Silent Killer, > Thomas Smith, Loveland, > Colorado, revised 2nd > edition, July 2000, p. 20 > 21. Law Offices of Charles H. Johnson & Associates > (telephone 1 800 535 > 5727, toll free in North America) > 22. American Heart Association, " Diabetes Mellitus > Statistics " , > http://www.amhrt.org > 23. Shanmugasundaram, E.R.B. et al. (Dr Ambedkar > Institute of Diabetes, > Kilpauk Medical College Hospital, Madras, India), > " Possible regeneration of > the Islets of Langerhans in Streptozotocin-diabetic > rats given Gymnema > sylvestre leaf extract " , J. Ethnopharmacology > 30:265-279 (1990); > Shanmugasundaram, E.R.B. et al., " Use of Gemnema > sylvestre leaf extract in > the control of blood glucose in insulin-dependent > diabetes mellitus " , J. > Ethnopharmacology 30:281-294 (1990) > 24. Smith, ibid., pp. 97-123 > 25. Many popular artificial sweeteners on sale in > the supermarket are > extremely poisonous and dangerous to the diabetic; > indeed, many of them are > worse than the sugar the diabetic is trying to > avoid; see, for example, > Smith, ibid., pp. 53-58. > 26. Walker, Morton, MD, and Shah, Hitendra, MD, > Chelation Therapy, Keats > Publishing, Inc., New Canaan, Connecticut, 1997, > ISBN 0-87983-730-6 > Read only the mail you want - Mail SpamGuard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 13, 2010 Report Share Posted March 13, 2010 Our Deadly Diabetes Deception Greed and dishonest science have promoted a lucrative worldwide epidemic of diabetes that honesty and good science can quickly reverse by naturally restoring the body's blood-sugar control mechanism. Extracted from Nexus Magazine, Volume 11, Number 4 (June-July 2004) PO Box 30, Mapleton Qld 4560 Australia. editor Telephone: +61 (0)7 5442 9280; Fax: +61 (0)7 5442 9381 From our web page at: www.nexusmagazine.com by Thomas Smith © 2004 PO Box 7685 Loveland, CO 80537 USA Moderator adds: This is very long but useful post and the main matter is stored as a file " nexus_-the-diabetes-deception.pdf " in the folder articles, sub-folder Dr.BhateFiles. You may find another similar article " Diabetes and its awfull Toll " in the same subfolder. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.