changing colors of modern science

[Guest guest]

The science seeks evidence and rational thinking to accept any

statement posed as a generally applicable rule. however, the data

based research is always valid to the class of population used for

the study, and at best, may provide the conclusions having limited

applicability. Moment one parameter which was not controlled in the

population changes, the whole truth becomes a myth. Many herbs kill

the bacteria in our digestive canal. Moment friendly bacteria are

eliminated, the gas, acidity, weakness start. But bacteria whether

they are friendly or enemies gets decided by geopgraphy, population,

diet etc. scientific answers based on evidence of experiments in

labs, hospitals need revision w.r.t new population. Why local herbs

should be used for local population and even diets can not be

generalized, why vaidyas should apply experience and intuition based logic, gets

partially explained here:

 

http://health./message/5176

 

can it be said that the strain of H. pylori in India, being fed on lots of

balanced food having high spiritual energy, is a spiritually evolved one and

does not like to cause any problems to Indians?

 

same basic idea prevails in reducing liver cancer promoting environment by

simple probiotics:

 

ayurveda/message/6770

ayurveda/message/6784