Fwd: Origin of Munda tribes

[Guest guest]

INDOLOGY , " Stephen Hodge " <s.hodge@p...> wrote:

Aslam Rasoolpuri wrote:

 

> I checked some site about Lemuria. I think there are some doubts in

scholars that was it a

> real island or not.

Generally, sensible scholars regard Churchward's Mu / Lemuria

hypothesis as

an unwarranted product of the late Victorian / Edwardian era on a par

with

the contemporary Atrlantis theory. Best not to waste your time on

that.

 

If you want a plausible suggestion of the origin of the Munda, I

suggest you

read: " Eden in the East: The Drowned Continent of the Southeast Asia "

by

Stephen Oppenheimer. This outlines a much more convincing and

scientifically-based theory which places the " lost continent " in the

SE

Asian peninsular, extending down through the Indonesian and

neighbouring

archipelagoes, which he calls Sundaland. Prior to the collapse of the

Laurentide Ice Shield (in Canada) at the very tail end of the last

ice-age

(c8000-7000BCE), sea levels world wide would have been significantly

lower.

The release of thousands of cubic kilometres of water would have

raised the

water very swiftly and inundate any low-lying areas. Oppenheimer is a

geneticist and sees evidence of a huge diaspora of survivors from that

drowned area in genetic data, specifically concerning a variant of

sickle-cell anaemia which is unique to the Borneo / Indonesian

region. He

also adduces considerable lingusitic and cultural (eg rice

cultivation)

corroboration for his theory.

 

Best wishes,

Stephen Hodge

--- End forwarded message ---

[Guest guest]

There is a theory that Andhras(migrated from North of tamilnadu-it

could be either from North India or from Deccan plataeu which is to

the north of TN)were the aborigines of Tamil Nadu, whereas Tamils

have come from Lemuria(in Indian ocean), when the island was on the

verge of drowning totally.

 

Can any list member please throw more light on this?

 

kishore

, " kishore mohan "

<kishore_future> wrote:

> INDOLOGY , " Stephen Hodge " <s.hodge@p...>

wrote:

> Aslam Rasoolpuri wrote:

>

> > I checked some site about Lemuria. I think there are some doubts

in

> scholars that was it a

> > real island or not.

> Generally, sensible scholars regard Churchward's Mu / Lemuria

> hypothesis as

> an unwarranted product of the late Victorian / Edwardian era on a

par

> with

> the contemporary Atrlantis theory. Best not to waste your time on

> that.

>

> If you want a plausible suggestion of the origin of the Munda, I

> suggest you

> read: " Eden in the East: The Drowned Continent of the Southeast

Asia "

> by

> Stephen Oppenheimer. This outlines a much more convincing and

> scientifically-based theory which places the " lost continent " in

the

> SE

> Asian peninsular, extending down through the Indonesian and

> neighbouring

> archipelagoes, which he calls Sundaland. Prior to the collapse of

the

> Laurentide Ice Shield (in Canada) at the very tail end of the last

> ice-age

> (c8000-7000BCE), sea levels world wide would have been

significantly

> lower.

> The release of thousands of cubic kilometres of water would have

> raised the

> water very swiftly and inundate any low-lying areas. Oppenheimer

is a

> geneticist and sees evidence of a huge diaspora of survivors from

that

> drowned area in genetic data, specifically concerning a variant of

> sickle-cell anaemia which is unique to the Borneo / Indonesian

> region. He

> also adduces considerable lingusitic and cultural (eg rice

> cultivation)

> corroboration for his theory.

>

> Best wishes,

> Stephen Hodge

> --- End forwarded message ---

[Guest guest]

Sir

Have you checked this site

 

www.atlan.org

 

 

 

 

kishore mohan <kishore_future wrote: There is a theory that Andhras(migrated from North of tamilnadu-it could be either from North India or from Deccan plataeu which is to the north of TN)were the aborigines of Tamil Nadu, whereas Tamils have come from Lemuria(in Indian ocean), when the island was on the verge of drowning totally. Can any list member please throw more light on this?kishore , "kishore mohan" <kishore_future> wrote:> INDOLOGY , "Stephen Hodge" <s.hodge@p...> wrote:> Aslam Rasoolpuri wrote:> > > I checked some site about Lemuria. I think there are some doubts in> scholars that was it a> > real island or not.> Generally, sensible scholars regard Churchward's Mu / Lemuria > hypothesis as> an unwarranted

product of the late Victorian / Edwardian era on a par > with> the contemporary Atrlantis theory. Best not to waste your time on > that.> > If you want a plausible suggestion of the origin of the Munda, I > suggest you> read: "Eden in the East: The Drowned Continent of the Southeast Asia" > by> Stephen Oppenheimer. This outlines a much more convincing and> scientifically-based theory which places the "lost continent" in the > SE> Asian peninsular, extending down through the Indonesian and > neighbouring> archipelagoes, which he calls Sundaland. Prior to the collapse of the> Laurentide Ice Shield (in Canada) at the very tail end of the last > ice-age> (c8000-7000BCE), sea levels world wide would have been significantly > lower.> The release of thousands of cubic kilometres of water would have > raised the>

water very swiftly and inundate any low-lying areas. Oppenheimer is a> geneticist and sees evidence of a huge diaspora of survivors from that> drowned area in genetic data, specifically concerning a variant of> sickle-cell anaemia which is unique to the Borneo / Indonesian > region. He> also adduces considerable lingusitic and cultural (eg rice > cultivation)> corroboration for his theory.> > Best wishes,> Stephen Hodge> --- End forwarded message ---

 

India Matrimony: Find your life partner

online.