Beware Underdeveloped 4 or 5 mukkhi sold as 1 Mukhi beads

[Guest guest]

Har Har Mahadev Group members, I have seen the pictures of Rudrakshas sent by our friend Viral, I am sorry to state that the quality of Rudrakshas as seen in the picture are not good. The beads appears to be very light in weight and less powerful. Mr. Arjun I had earlier also written in the group that 1 Mukhi you are dealing in is actually a 4 or 5 Mukhi underdeveloped bead and it is available in Rs. 2000/- odd INR, but you appeared to very excited to see the one mukhi bead picture sent by Mr. Viral and comparing it with your one Mukhi bead in your website. Pl devotees be very careful with these so called underdeveloped 4 or 5 mukhis beads sold now as one Mukhi these are not genuine 1 Mukhi beads. Dear Devottes Pl view the best and most genuine Rudrakshas collector beads at www..com or www.rudracentre.com Aum Namah Shivaye, Thanks and Regards, Rajiv Krishna Dasa WWW.SHALIGRAM.COM WWW.RUDRAKSHA-RATNA.COM panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004 wrote: dear friendthe photos of your rudraksha collection are very good and if you mention the number of faces under each photo, it would be even better for

those interested in them.however, your last photo number 41 is the round ek mukh rudraksha which is a hundred perecent replica of the round ek mukh rudraksha from my website www.rurdraksharemedy.comwould appereciate if you clarify on this photo of mine.with best wishes and blessingspandit arjunwww.rudraksharemedy.comsacred-objects , "viralpatel786" <viralpatel786 wrote:>> hello group> > u can have a uploaded my collections of rudraksha have a look and > respond me back> > > > thanks> > > Viral>

5, 50, 500, 5000 - Store N number of mails in your inbox.

[Guest guest]

Dear Rajiv

 

Thanks u very much for your generous comments.

 

I was't aware that a newbie like me is giving insecurities to companies

like www..com or www.rudracentre.com.

 

By the way that was a nice way of advertising your companies.

 

please keep on critizing my beads.

 

 

Viral patel

[Guest guest]

dear friend

 

since you took my name, it becomes obligatory for me to respond

positively.

 

thanks for your efforts to educate the members and discerning

devotees desirous of getting the round one mukhi rudraksha, which me

and my customers are already aware of.

 

since you touched this issue again, i must mince no words in clearly

telling that this round ek mukhi rudraksha is deemed and treated as a

round ek mukhi rudraksha even if it is an underdeveloped four or five

mukhi according to you and the customers who are buying this are told

about this truth beforehand.

 

for new members like viral and others who are not aware of the

sanction of this round ek mukh rudraksha, they may refer the previous

messages from this group from which i copy and paste below a couple

of lines written by the most famous rudraksha seller of india.

 

============quote=========

As I have mentioned in my book, if the lines originating from the

mouth portion do not get completed in a natural process and only one

line exists in its original shape,the bead may be accepted as one

mukhi, although such cases are also extremely rare. It is immaterial

if the shape has a five or four mukhi locule or it was meant to be

two mukhi or three mukhi.

The bead shown as one mukhi in my book is shapewise a 4 mukhi

rudraksha but there is only one line which existed naturally and this

rudraksha has never been tampered. This rudraksha is ours.

Regards,

Kamal N. Seetha

===========unquote=============

 

by the way, for the benefit of new members like viral, i may point

out that kaju or halfmoon shaped rudraksha does not have scriptural

sanction as ALL SCRIPTURES UNANIMOUSLY MENTION THAT A RUDRAKSHA MUST

BE ROUND IN SHAPE. all scritpures also mentione about the hole in

the rudraksh and also the significance of a hole formed naturally in

the round rudraksha. since the cashewnut or crescent shaped

rudraksha variant does not have any provision of a hole and it just

cannot have a natural hole, natives can easily rule these cashewnut

shaped flat beads as rudraksha lookalikes and not rudraksha. dr.

chandrasekhar phadke, who is a respected scientist with india's most

prestigeous institute CSIR also ratified earlier in this group itself

that this cashewnut lookalike rudraksha bead does not exactly not

belong to the same rudraksha family tree that produces 1 to 14 round

ek mukh rudraksha.

 

gauri shankar and trijuti rudraksha also do not find any scriptural

mention anywhere. only 1 to 14 mukh rudraksha are mentioned in all

scritpures and hence am dealing only in 1 to 14mukhi rudraksha.

 

with best wishes and blessings

pandit arjun

www.rudraksharemedy.com

 

sacred-objects , Shaligram Shala

<shaligram8 wrote:

>

> Har Har Mahadev Group members,

> I have seen the pictures of Rudrakshas sent by our friend Viral,

I am sorry to state that the quality of Rudrakshas as seen in the

picture are not good. The beads appears to be very light in weight

and less powerful.

> Mr. Arjun I had earlier also written in the group that 1 Mukhi

you are dealing in is actually a 4 or 5 Mukhi underdeveloped bead and

it is available in Rs. 2000/- odd INR, but you appeared to very

excited to see the one mukhi bead picture sent by Mr. Viral and

comparing it with your one Mukhi bead in your website.

> Pl devotees be very careful with these so called underdeveloped

4 or 5 mukhis beads sold now as one Mukhi these are not genuine 1

Mukhi beads.

> Dear Devottes Pl view the best and most genuine Rudrakshas

collector beads at

> www..com or www.rudracentre.com

>

> Aum Namah Shivaye,

> Thanks and Regards,

> Rajiv Krishna Dasa

> WWW.SHALIGRAM.COM

> WWW.RUDRAKSHA-RATNA.COM

>

>

> panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004 wrote:

> dear friend

>

> the photos of your rudraksha collection are very good and if you

> mention the number of faces under each photo, it would be even

better

> for those interested in them.

>

> however, your last photo number 41 is the round ek mukh rudraksha

which

> is a hundred perecent replica of the round ek mukh rudraksha from

my

> website www.rurdraksharemedy.com

>

> would appereciate if you clarify on this photo of mine.

>

> with best wishes and blessings

> pandit arjun

> www.rudraksharemedy.com

>

> sacred-objects , " viralpatel786 "

> <viralpatel786@> wrote:

> >

> > hello group

> >

> > u can have a uploaded my collections of rudraksha have a look and

> > respond me back

> >

> >

> >

> > thanks

> >

> >

> > Viral

> >

 

> 5, 50, 500, 5000 - Store N number of mails in your inbox. Click

here.

>

[Guest guest]

Dear All,

 

Having read the words of Rspd Kamal Sita Narayan (below) it seems to me

that a goal-daana Eka mukhi IS an underdeveloped seed that formed with

only one line on one side. To state as such is kind of like saying that

water is actually H2O. So in that respect it is not underdeveloped,

rather it is developed into genuine Eka Mukhi goal danna.

 

Best wishes,

Richard

 

--- panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004 wrote:

 

> dear friend

>

> since you took my name, it becomes obligatory for me to respond

> positively.

>

> thanks for your efforts to educate the members and discerning

> devotees desirous of getting the round one mukhi rudraksha, which me

> and my customers are already aware of.

>

> since you touched this issue again, i must mince no words in clearly

> telling that this round ek mukhi rudraksha is deemed and treated as a

>

> round ek mukhi rudraksha even if it is an underdeveloped four or five

>

> mukhi according to you and the customers who are buying this are told

>

> about this truth beforehand.

>

> for new members like viral and others who are not aware of the

> sanction of this round ek mukh rudraksha, they may refer the previous

>

> messages from this group from which i copy and paste below a couple

> of lines written by the most famous rudraksha seller of india.

>

> ============quote=========

> As I have mentioned in my book, if the lines originating from the

> mouth portion do not get completed in a natural process and only one

> line exists in its original shape,the bead may be accepted as one

> mukhi, although such cases are also extremely rare. It is immaterial

> if the shape has a five or four mukhi locule or it was meant to be

> two mukhi or three mukhi.

> The bead shown as one mukhi in my book is shapewise a 4 mukhi

> rudraksha but there is only one line which existed naturally and this

>

> rudraksha has never been tampered. This rudraksha is ours.

> Regards,

> Kamal N. Seetha

> ===========unquote=============

>

> by the way, for the benefit of new members like viral, i may point

> out that kaju or halfmoon shaped rudraksha does not have scriptural

> sanction as ALL SCRIPTURES UNANIMOUSLY MENTION THAT A RUDRAKSHA MUST

> BE ROUND IN SHAPE. all scritpures also mentione about the hole in

> the rudraksh and also the significance of a hole formed naturally in

> the round rudraksha. since the cashewnut or crescent shaped

> rudraksha variant does not have any provision of a hole and it just

> cannot have a natural hole, natives can easily rule these cashewnut

> shaped flat beads as rudraksha lookalikes and not rudraksha. dr.

> chandrasekhar phadke, who is a respected scientist with india's most

> prestigeous institute CSIR also ratified earlier in this group itself

>

> that this cashewnut lookalike rudraksha bead does not exactly not

> belong to the same rudraksha family tree that produces 1 to 14 round

> ek mukh rudraksha.

>

> gauri shankar and trijuti rudraksha also do not find any scriptural

> mention anywhere. only 1 to 14 mukh rudraksha are mentioned in all

> scritpures and hence am dealing only in 1 to 14mukhi rudraksha.

>

> with best wishes and blessings

> pandit arjun

> www.rudraksharemedy.com

>

> sacred-objects , Shaligram Shala

> <shaligram8 wrote:

> >

> > Har Har Mahadev Group members,

> > I have seen the pictures of Rudrakshas sent by our friend Viral,

> I am sorry to state that the quality of Rudrakshas as seen in the

> picture are not good. The beads appears to be very light in weight

> and less powerful.

> > Mr. Arjun I had earlier also written in the group that 1 Mukhi

> you are dealing in is actually a 4 or 5 Mukhi underdeveloped bead and

>

> it is available in Rs. 2000/- odd INR, but you appeared to very

> excited to see the one mukhi bead picture sent by Mr. Viral and

> comparing it with your one Mukhi bead in your website.

> > Pl devotees be very careful with these so called underdeveloped

> 4 or 5 mukhis beads sold now as one Mukhi these are not genuine 1

> Mukhi beads.

> > Dear Devottes Pl view the best and most genuine Rudrakshas

> collector beads at

> > www..com or www.rudracentre.com

> >

> > Aum Namah Shivaye,

> > Thanks and Regards,

> > Rajiv Krishna Dasa

> > WWW.SHALIGRAM.COM

> > WWW.RUDRAKSHA-RATNA.COM

> >

> >

> > panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004 wrote:

> > dear friend

> >

> > the photos of your rudraksha collection are very good and if you

> > mention the number of faces under each photo, it would be even

> better

> > for those interested in them.

> >

> > however, your last photo number 41 is the round ek mukh rudraksha

> which

> > is a hundred perecent replica of the round ek mukh rudraksha from

> my

> > website www.rurdraksharemedy.com

> >

> > would appereciate if you clarify on this photo of mine.

> >

> > with best wishes and blessings

> > pandit arjun

> > www.rudraksharemedy.com

> >

> > sacred-objects , " viralpatel786 "

> > <viralpatel786@> wrote:

> > >

> > > hello group

> > >

> > > u can have a uploaded my collections of rudraksha have a look and

>

> > > respond me back

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > thanks

> > >

> > >

> > > Viral

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > 5, 50, 500, 5000 - Store N number of mails in your inbox. Click

> here.

> >

>

>

>

 

 

Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.

[Guest guest]

dear richardji

 

you said it rightly. let me also add for the benefit of new members

like viral that there is no separate tree for each face of

rudraksha. some customers still believe a myth that onemukhi tree

produces one mukhi, 14mukhi tree produces 14mukhi and 21mukhi tree

produce 21mukhi.

---Dear Panditji! That is so funny! Bravo!!!

 

you, me and all rudraksha sellers are well aware of this basic naked

truth that one rudraksha tree produces various faceted rudraksha and

the faces on each rudraksha are known only after they are counted.

 

so the round ek mukh rudraksha is firstly a GENUINE rudraksha from

the original rudraksha tree.

 

secondly the solitary single line from top to bottom is genuine,

natural, real and not manmade. similarly the other lines are not

stopped from growing and are not formed on their own.

 

hence the round ek mukhi rudraksha having only one naturally

developed line is a genuine ek mukhi rudraksha.

 

now the point of argument. if this rudrakhsa has three or four more

lines measuring a couple of millimeters at the top and/or at the

bottom, the customer sees it and knows it beforehand but he is

CONSTRUING that it is a genuine round ek mukh rudraksha since that

one line is formed naturally and the other lines are not formed

naturally. others may put this sentence in negative language like a

rudraksha having three underdeveloped and one fully developed etc.

and they are at liberty not to touch or deal with it if they are not

comfortable with. i am reasonbly convinced that this single line is

natural and the other lines have not been formed naturally and hence

this is a natural one mukhi rudraksha.

 

as regards dasaji mentioning about the price of only two thousand

rupees, there is no fixed product rate for rudraksha. you visit ten

different rudraksha sellers and you find ten different rates, hence

we shall not debate on the price.

 

being a rudraksha supplier, one shall not jump into a fit of rage

just by seeing one product sold by someone else which he does not

deal with. for example i am not dealing in kaju rudraksha but i am

not on a mission to educate the world not to fall for it and dont

take a dig at the respected and reverred rudraksha suppliers who must

have sold millions or crores of beads of kaju rudraksha. only if

someone approahces me and ask for a kaju, then i say about this,

otherwise i am at peace. so why shall others who dont deal in round

ek mukhi rudraksha have objection to me dealing in this product.

 

peaceful mutual coexistence of dealers and nondealers of a particular

product is possible only if each mind his own business.

 

with best wishes and blessings

pandit arjun

www.rudraksharemedy.com

 

sacred-objects , Richard Shaw Brown

<rsbj66 wrote:

>

> Dear All,

>

> Having read the words of Rspd Kamal Sita Narayan (below) it seems

to me

> that a goal-daana Eka mukhi IS an underdeveloped seed that formed

with

> only one line on one side. To state as such is kind of like saying

that

> water is actually H2O. So in that respect it is not underdeveloped,

> rather it is developed into genuine Eka Mukhi goal danna.

>

> Best wishes,

> Richard

>

> --- panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004 wrote:

>

> > dear friend

> >

> > since you took my name, it becomes obligatory for me to respond

> > positively.

> >

> > thanks for your efforts to educate the members and discerning

> > devotees desirous of getting the round one mukhi rudraksha, which

me

> > and my customers are already aware of.

> >

> > since you touched this issue again, i must mince no words in

clearly

> > telling that this round ek mukhi rudraksha is deemed and treated

as a

> >

> > round ek mukhi rudraksha even if it is an underdeveloped four or

five

> >

> > mukhi according to you and the customers who are buying this are

told

> >

> > about this truth beforehand.

> >

> > for new members like viral and others who are not aware of the

> > sanction of this round ek mukh rudraksha, they may refer the

previous

> >

> > messages from this group from which i copy and paste below a

couple

> > of lines written by the most famous rudraksha seller of india.

> >

> > ============quote=========

> > As I have mentioned in my book, if the lines originating from the

> > mouth portion do not get completed in a natural process and only

one

> > line exists in its original shape,the bead may be accepted as one

> > mukhi, although such cases are also extremely rare. It is

immaterial

> > if the shape has a five or four mukhi locule or it was meant to

be

> > two mukhi or three mukhi.

> > The bead shown as one mukhi in my book is shapewise a 4 mukhi

> > rudraksha but there is only one line which existed naturally and

this

> >

> > rudraksha has never been tampered. This rudraksha is ours.

> > Regards,

> > Kamal N. Seetha

> > ===========unquote=============

> >

> > by the way, for the benefit of new members like viral, i may

point

> > out that kaju or halfmoon shaped rudraksha does not have

scriptural

> > sanction as ALL SCRIPTURES UNANIMOUSLY MENTION THAT A RUDRAKSHA

MUST

> > BE ROUND IN SHAPE. all scritpures also mentione about the hole

in

> > the rudraksh and also the significance of a hole formed naturally

in

> > the round rudraksha. since the cashewnut or crescent shaped

> > rudraksha variant does not have any provision of a hole and it

just

> > cannot have a natural hole, natives can easily rule these

cashewnut

> > shaped flat beads as rudraksha lookalikes and not rudraksha. dr.

> > chandrasekhar phadke, who is a respected scientist with india's

most

> > prestigeous institute CSIR also ratified earlier in this group

itself

> >

> > that this cashewnut lookalike rudraksha bead does not exactly not

> > belong to the same rudraksha family tree that produces 1 to 14

round

> > ek mukh rudraksha.

> >

> > gauri shankar and trijuti rudraksha also do not find any

scriptural

> > mention anywhere. only 1 to 14 mukh rudraksha are mentioned in

all

> > scritpures and hence am dealing only in 1 to 14mukhi rudraksha.

> >

> > with best wishes and blessings

> > pandit arjun

> > www.rudraksharemedy.com

> >

> > sacred-objects , Shaligram Shala

> > <shaligram8@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Har Har Mahadev Group members,

> > > I have seen the pictures of Rudrakshas sent by our friend

Viral,

> > I am sorry to state that the quality of Rudrakshas as seen in the

> > picture are not good. The beads appears to be very light in

weight

> > and less powerful.

> > > Mr. Arjun I had earlier also written in the group that 1

Mukhi

> > you are dealing in is actually a 4 or 5 Mukhi underdeveloped bead

and

> >

> > it is available in Rs. 2000/- odd INR, but you appeared to very

> > excited to see the one mukhi bead picture sent by Mr. Viral and

> > comparing it with your one Mukhi bead in your website.

> > > Pl devotees be very careful with these so called

underdeveloped

> > 4 or 5 mukhis beads sold now as one Mukhi these are not genuine 1

> > Mukhi beads.

> > > Dear Devottes Pl view the best and most genuine Rudrakshas

> > collector beads at

> > > www..com or www.rudracentre.com

> > >

> > > Aum Namah Shivaye,

> > > Thanks and Regards,

> > > Rajiv Krishna Dasa

> > > WWW.SHALIGRAM.COM

> > > WWW.RUDRAKSHA-RATNA.COM

> > >

> > >

> > > panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004@> wrote:

> > > dear friend

> > >

> > > the photos of your rudraksha collection are very good and if

you

> > > mention the number of faces under each photo, it would be even

> > better

> > > for those interested in them.

> > >

> > > however, your last photo number 41 is the round ek mukh

rudraksha

> > which

> > > is a hundred perecent replica of the round ek mukh rudraksha

from

> > my

> > > website www.rurdraksharemedy.com

> > >

> > > would appereciate if you clarify on this photo of mine.

> > >

> > > with best wishes and blessings

> > > pandit arjun

> > > www.rudraksharemedy.com

> > >

> > > sacred-objects , " viralpatel786 "

> > > <viralpatel786@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > hello group

> > > >

> > > > u can have a uploaded my collections of rudraksha have a look

and

> >

> > > > respond me back

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > thanks

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Viral

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > 5, 50, 500, 5000 - Store N number of mails in your inbox.

Click

> > here.

> > >

> >

> >

> >

>

>

> Send instant messages to your online friends

http://uk.messenger.

>