Guest guest Posted December 22, 2000 Report Posted December 22, 2000 Sriamthyai Godhayai Nama: SrimathE RaamAnujAya Nama: Dear BhakthAs: In the previous ThiruppAvai Paasuram , ANDAL and Her fellow gopis made Pancha Moorthy vandhanam during the occasion of waking up a novice devotee: (1) " Vitthinai " --> Para VaasudEvan at Sri Vaikuntam (2) " VeLLattharaviRRuyil amarntha-->VyUham at Milky Ocean (3) Sakatam Kalakkazhiya KaalOcchi--> Vibhavam (KrishNan) (4) PuLlarayan Koilil--> Archai ( Sri VilliputthUr) (5) ULLatthu KoNDU--> Haarthan or antharyAmi Brahmam In this seventh Paasuram , ANDAL pays tribute to Sriman NaarAyaNan as the Para Devathai (Supreme One). The girl who is being awakened here is not a novice but one devoted to KrishNa , but she is now engaged in wild sleep (Murattu thUkkam )in a state of indifference to Him. She is sleeping away at a time (Brahma muhUrtham), when people of saathvic tendency would be up and offering their prayers to the Lord.Therefore , the gopis outside the house address her first as " pEy peNNE " or the girl with TamO guNam. Later , they address the sleeping girl as " Naayaka peNNpiLLAi and tEsamudayAi " in recognition of her rank in AaypAdi and her lustre as a parama Bhaagavathai . Meaning of the Seventh Paasuram (V.S) ************************************** Oh pEy peNNE (deluded girl)! do n't you hear the noise raised by the Aanai Saatthan birds ( BharadhvAja Birds in Sanskrit and Valiyans in Tamizh)? Does n't your sleep get affected by the Keesu-Keesu sabdham (avyaktha madhura sallAbham ) of these busy birds outside your sleeping chambers? The dawn is advancing .There are signs of the world awakening all around you. Do n't you hear the sound made by the busy churning of the curd by the other gopis with symmetric movement of their churning rods ? The body movement(exertions) of these beautiful gopis sends out fragrances from their flower-adorned locks of well combed hair . Their engagement in the churning act makes their bangles and other aabharaNams around their neck (acchu thAli, Aamai thAli et al) collide against each other and result in a rhythmic musical sound (mangaLa naadham ). Do n't you hear that auspicious jingling sound ? Are n't you awakened yet by the sloshing of the curd as a result of the strong movement of the churning rod in your neighbor's houses during this still hour of the morning? Oh crown gem among gopis ! How can you be so indifferent and sleep away even after hearing us singing the nAmams of our Lord Kesavan, who destroyed the demon Kesi appearing in disguise as a horse ? Please awaken and get up ! Oh Luminous one! Come and open the door so that we could sing together about the mahimai of our Lord with you. Inner Meanings of " Keesu Keesu " Paasuram ****************************************** aanai saatthAn Our Lord , who defeated our indhriyams (having the strength of the elephants ), and stimulated us to perform Prapatthi at His lotus feet Kalanthu That Lord joining His Dharma Pathnee in conversation Keesu Keesu yenRu Have n't you heard their sweet dialog , yengum pEsina where PirAtti says " asthutE pEccharavam dayayaiva sarvam sampathsyatE " (Oh PrapannA! kEttilayO? You will realize all your wishes as a result of your performing prapatthi ) and the Lord responding with the blessing " May you perform all Kaimkaryams for us in all places (sarava desam) and all times (sarva kaalam)? pEy peNNE ! Oh Maiden , who is deeply lost in Bhagavathanubhavam and as a result look like a deluded one ! Vaasa NaRum VyAsar and other AchAryAs who have Kuzhal Aacchiyar researched on the fragrant tressses like Upanishads , which contain inside them the Sarvaghandhan, Sriman NaarAyaNan kaasum piRappum of the wealth of Brahmins , Vedhams and the smruthis born out of them kalakalappa and describing the VedArthams with kalanthu the help of smruthis and UpabrahMaNams kai pErtthu VyAsar and AchAryAs raise their hands matthinAl osai- after churning with their intellect paduttha thayir the curd (annam) like BhOgya NaarAyaNan aravam kEttilayO? and declare (assert) without doubt that Sriman NaarAyaNan is Para DEvathai (There is no god , who is equal to or greater than Him ).Oh pEy peNNE ! Have n't you heard that loud declaration? Naayaka peNN Oh smart one , who understands fully piLLAi the Para dEvathA aspect of our Lord and thereby have become the leader of our ghOshti NaarAyaNan Moorthy when they declare(sing) that NaarAyaNan Kesavanaip paadavum is the One , who created BrahmA and Sivan nee kEtto kidatthiyO ? even after hearing that powerful message , how can you stay without performing SaraNAgathi at Sriman NaarAyaNan's sacred feet ? tEsam udayAi Oh Maiden with such a wealth of Jn~Anam about Tatthva-Hitha- PurushArtham ! ThiRa Please seek the upAyam of Prapatthi to reach Him . Other anubhavams of commentators ********************************* A. Abhinava Desikan's anubhavam ******************************** This paasuram describes the status of those BhAgyasAlis involved with Ubhaya VedAntha vimarsanam and invites those , who are adept in other SaasthrAs to follow the way of the former group . The end result of Ubhaya- VedAntha nishkarsham (evaluation ) is the unassailable conclusion that Sriman NaarAyaNan is the Para Devathai. B.Sri P.B.AnnangarAcchAr Swamy's anubhavam ******************************************* (1)pEy peNNE : Swamy quotes two dhivya prabhandham passages to intrepret the deep devotion of the maiden (utthama adhikAri)of of this paasuram: " atthA ariyE yenRu unnai azhaikka , pitthAvenRu pEsuhinrar piRar yennai " ---Thirumangai: periya Thirumozhi:7.1.8 " Arangan adiyArkaLukkAhi AvanukkE pittharAmAvar pittharalkarhaL maRRayAr muRRum pittharE " ---KulasEkarar: PerumAL Thirumozhi--> 2.9 (2) " Kaasum piRappum kala kalappa " : Innner meaning is that the two abhAranams (Aathma guNams) are Samam and dhamam . They compliment each other to enhance the stature of the adhikAri. C. Upanishad BhAshyakArar's observations ***************************************** (1) pEy peNNE!: hE BhrAntha BaalikE! (2) Naayaka peNN hE KanyA MaNi! PiLLAi! (3) tEsamudayAi hE TejasvinI ! Sri RangaraamAnuja Muni quotes GithA passage " BhOdhayantham Parasparam " . He points out that " paraspara BhOdhanam " is BhAgavatha kruthyam and that the KanyA MaNi is awakened to come out and join in the mutual lessons befitting her role as an illustrious (tEjasvini) devotee . D.PerukkAraNai Swamy's observations ************************************ (1) aanai-chaathAn: This name refers to EmperumAn , who killed one Yaanai (elephant KuvAlayapeetam) and protected another (GajEndhran). Saatthuthal means killing. Saathuthal (SaaRRuthal) also means honoring . (2) NaarayaNa Moorthy Kesavanaip paadavum: Kesavan is the abhimAna dEvathai for the month of Marghazhi. He is one of the Upa-vyUha Moorthy of Sriman NaarAyaNan . Hence in this month Kesavan has to be worshipped. (3) In Sri BhAshyam , AchArya RaamAnujA did not use the Naamams of NaarAyanan, VaasudEvan , KrishNan , Raaman et al. He used the saamAnya sabdhams like ParamAthmA , Para Brahmam instead . Vyasar , the Brahama- SoothrakArar used NaarAyana sabdham only in Linga bhUyasthvAthi adhikaraNam. ANDAL invoked the name of NaarAyaNA thrice in ThiruppAvai just as the Moola Manthram and dhvaya manthram uses thrice NaarAyana sabdham between themselves . One such use of NaarAyana sabdham is in this ThiruppAvai Paasuram . ANDAL , Aazhagiya Singar ThiruvadigaLE SaraNam RaamAnuja Daasan, Oppiliappan Koil VaradAchAri SatakOpan Quote
Guest guest Posted December 22, 2000 Report Posted December 22, 2000 SrI: SrI Lakshminrusimha ParabrahmaNE namaH SrI Lakshminrusimha divya pAdukA sEvaka SrIvaN SaThakOpa- SrI nArAyaNa yateendra mahAdESikAya namaH namO nArAyaNa! Dear SrI SaThakOpan, Thanks once again for your continual posting of an excellent series. aDiyEn would like to add few clarifications on couple of issues. > (1) " Vitthinai " --> Para VaasudEvan at Sri Vaikuntam > (2) " VeLLattharaviRRuyil amarntha-->VyUham at Milky Ocean > (3) Sakatam Kalakkazhiya KaalOcchi--> Vibhavam (KrishNan) > (4) PuLlarayan Koilil--> Archai ( Sri VilliputthUr) Since the whole of thiruppAvai pAsurams are in gOpi bhAvam, the incidents that take place are in gOkulam. While waking up their first friend, the gOpis lead by AnDAL refer to the sound of Sankha in the " PULLarayan KOvil " (PerumAL KOvil ie.the Lord of the bird <puL> - GaruDAzhwAr), which is in the gOkulam. SrI NaDAdUr " SrI BhAshya SimhAsanAdipati " Aasukavi VillUr SrInidhi swAmi, the father of SrI KarunAkaran swAmi has given his wonderful interpretation that the kovil referred here at gOkulam is where Uttsava mUrti of present MElkotte temple - " RAmapriyar " should have been present in that yuga. It is based on some incidents in PurANas and SwAmi DESikan's SrI SUktis, with probably some intuitions. aDiyEn does not remember the sources to a good confident level - but remembers some incidents. GaruDAzhwAr while returning back after getting the kireetam of pARkadal SrIman nArAyaNan which went to the hands of someone, saw kutti kaN^N^an at gOkulam and straightaway got attracted and crowned the vibhava avatAra PerumAL {Source : YAdavAbhyudayam - almost sure}. This kireetam was with Lord KrishNa. BalarAmar was very fond of the uttsava mUrti in the local gOkulam temple which yielded the name " rAmapriyar " to PerumAL. He then consecrated RAmapriyar back at DwAraka. When Lord KrishNa was ready to make an end to His avatAram, He instructed some yadus to take care of Ramapriyar by consecrating in the present MElkOtte region since there will soon be a great collapse of yadu dynasty. PerumAL gave the kireetam also alongwith them. It is the famous " vaira-muDi " of mElkOtte. Note for those interested in logical issues : The Kireetam of pAR-kadal PerumAL has to be really huge. It fitted Lord KrishNa from his childhood times also RAmapriyar !! Well, afterall kireetam is a nitya-sUri with the thirumEni being flexible Or even direct bhagavad sankalpam is enough. > (3) In Sri BhAshyam , AchArya RaamAnujA did not > use the Naamams of NaarAyanan, VaasudEvan , KrishNan , > Raaman et al. He used the saamAnya sabdhams like > ParamAthmA , Para Brahmam instead . Vyasar , the Brahama- > SoothrakArar used NaarAyana sabdham only in > Linga bhUyasthvAthi adhikaraNam. LingabhUyastvAdhikaraNam occurs in 3rd pAda of 3rd adhyAya. The only sUtra for this adhikaraNam is " LingabhUyastvAttaddhi balIyastadapi " . The whole passage of " SahasraSIrsham dEvam viSvAksham viSva Sambhuvam | ViSvam nArAyaNam dEvamaksharam paramam prabhum| ..... till SO<a>ksharaH paramassvarAt| " becomes relevant to the discussion {whether this nArAyaNa anuvAkkam is connected with Dahara Vidya Or independent etc} - says Bhagavad RAmAnuja in SrI BhAshyam. Thus, in the commentary for this sUtra, BhAshyakArar uses nArAyaNa sabdam few times. This is referred by SrI PerukkAraN^ai swAmi here. VyAsar has not mentioned " nArAyaNa " sabdam in Brahma SUtras. AnDAL thiruvaDigaLE SaraNam aDiyEn rAmAnuja dAsan, anantapadmanAbhan. krushNArpaNam. Quote
Guest guest Posted December 22, 2000 Report Posted December 22, 2000 At 11:32 PM 12/22/00 +0530, you wrote: SrI: SrI Lakshminrusimha ParabrahmaNE namaH SrI Lakshminrusimha divya pAdukA sEvaka SrIvaN SaThakOpa- SrI nArAyaNa yateendra mahAdESikAya namaH namO nArAyaNa! Dear SrI Anand: Thanks very much for your welcome feedback . >> (4) PuLlarayan Koilil--> Archai ( Sri VilliputthUr) > > Since the whole of thiruppAvai pAsurams are in gOpi > bhAvam, the incidents that take place are in gOkulam. > While waking up their first friend, the gOpis lead by > AnDAL refer to the sound of Sankha in the " PULLarayan > KOvil " (PerumAL KOvil ie.the Lord of the bird <puL> - > GaruDAzhwAr), which is in the gOkulam. You are correct with respect to the Bhaavanai of ANDAL , who considered SrivilliputthUr as Gokulam and herself and Her friends as Gopis as PeriyavAcchAn PiLlai pointed out. In SrivilliputthUr , the dhivya desa Vaasis out of pride for their KshEthram identify it as PuLLarayan Koil . Their additional reason for such affiliation is that PeriyAzhwAr is GarudAmsam .It is an understandable abhimAnam for SrivilliputthUr by SrivilliputthUr vaasis. The KanyA Vratham ( Bhaagavatham's Kaathyayani Pooja) is described By Swamy Desikan in YadhAvAbhudhayam:4.46 In 4.39 , Swamy Desikan describes the move of VsaudEvar and Devaki with their people to BrundhAvanam to get away from the anishtams at Gokulam . In slOkams 4.81 and 4.82 , Swamy Desikan describes the KirIta SamarpaNam to the Lord at BrundhAvanam: dEvasya dughdhOdasaysya dhaithyAdh VairOchanadhvyAla bhujOpaneetha: KrishaNasya Mouli krutha bharha chUDE nyastha: KiriDO nibhiDI bhabhUva--YA:4.82 Here , Swamy Desikan refers to the stolen KirItam of the KshIrAbdhinAthan and its retreival by Garudan and samarpaNam to Bala KrishNan at BrundhAvanam . Swamy says that huge KirItam shrank and fitted exactly to the dimensions of Bala KrishNan's siras since He is the same one as PaaRkkadal ThuyinRavan . Swamy Desikan covers this samarpaNam at greater length in Garuda PanchAsath sLlOkam quoted below. > > SrI NaDAdUr " SrI BhAshya SimhAsanAdipati " Aasukavi VillUr > SrInidhi swAmi, the father of SrI KarunAkaran swAmi > has given his wonderful interpretation that the kovil referred > here at gOkulam is where Uttsava mUrti of present MElkotte > temple - " RAmapriyar " should have been present in that > yuga. It is based on some incidents in PurANas and SwAmi > DESikan's SrI SUktis, with probably some intuitions. This is a very nice link with Raama Priyar and Vaira Mudi sEvai. The particualr Sri Sookthi of Swamy Desikan is the 49th SlOkam of Sri Garuda PanchAsath: " DughdhOdahnvath PrabhUtha:svakamahima prathur VishNunA KRISHNA NAAMANAA pinchA kalpAnukalpa: samagaDi sudgruDO yathprathishta KIREEDA: VeerO VairOchanasthra vranakiNa guNitha- udhagra nirghAthaghAtha: SanghAtham sarpagjAthi sa harathu mahathAm asmathadhyahihtAnAm " Here Swami Desikan refers to the mischief of VirOchanan at Milky Ocean , when the Lord was engaged in Yoga nidhrai. He stole the Lord's KirItam and ran off to PaathALam and hid there. The sages who came for Bhagaavth darsanam were saddened to see the absence of crown on their Lord's head and found out through their Jn~Ana dhrushti that it was VairOchanan (Son of PrahlAdhAzhwAn) who had stolen it. They determined that Garuda BhagavAn alone can retreive the Crown of the Lord and requested Garudan , who went to PaathALa lOkam and had a fierce fight with VirOchanan. Garudan repossessed the crown although He was wounded by the sjharp arrows of VairOchanan. GarudAn ascended from PaathALam with that huge crown of the Lord.As He flew over BrundhAvanam , Garudan had the sEvA BhAgyam of Lord KrishNa with peacock feather in His kEsam . Garudan recognized ParamAthmA and placed the KirItam on the head of Bala KrishNan.That gigantic crown was shrunk by the sankalpam of the Lord and fitted Him exactly. Swamy concludes this slOkam with a prayer to Garuda BhagavAn , who had performed KirIta samarpana Kaimkaryam and had the Sevai of the Lord with KirItam to His(garudan's) heart's content. He asks Garudan to destroy our assembly of fierce sins (Sa: mahathAm asmath adhyAhithAnAm samgAtha: harathu). ANDAL refers to VinathA Suthan's kaimkaryam in NaachiyAtr ThirumOzhi Paasuram 14.: mElAl parantha veyyil kAppAn Vinathai siRuvan siRahennum mElArppon Keezh varuvAnai virunthAvanatthE KaNDOmE Here ANDAL refers not so much to the KirIta samarpaNam but to the kaimkaryam of serving as an umbrella against the heat of the mid day sun at BrindhAvanam .He spread His wings and provided shade for the Lord . One can imagine that Garudan was reluctant to leave the Sannidhi of KirIDadhAri and hovered in the sky to enjoy the sevai more . > > GaruDAzhwAr while returning back after getting the > kireetam of pARkadal SrIman nArAyaNan which went to the > hands of someone, saw kutti kaN^N^an at gOkulam and > straightaway got attracted and crowned the vibhava avatAra > PerumAL {Source : YAdavAbhyudayam - almost sure}. This > kireetam was with Lord KrishNa. BalarAmar was very fond > of the uttsava mUrti in the local gOkulam temple which > yielded the name " rAmapriyar " to PerumAL. He then consecrated > RAmapriyar back at DwAraka. When Lord KrishNa was ready to > make an end to His avatAram, He instructed some yadus to > take care of Ramapriyar by consecrating in the present > MElkOtte region since there will soon be a great collapse > of yadu dynasty. PerumAL gave the kireetam also alongwith > them. It is the famous " vaira-muDi " of mElkOtte. > >> (3) In Sri BhAshyam , AchArya RaamAnujA did not >> use the Naamams of NaarAyanan, VaasudEvan , KrishNan , >> Raaman et al. He used the saamAnya sabdhams like >> ParamAthmA , Para Brahmam instead . Vyasar , the Brahama- >> SoothrakArar used NaarAyana sabdham only in >> Linga bhUyasthvAthi adhikaraNam. > > LingabhUyastvAdhikaraNam occurs in 3rd pAda of 3rd adhyAya. > The only sUtra for this adhikaraNam is " LingabhUyastvAttaddhi > balIyastadapi " . > > The whole passage of " SahasraSIrsham dEvam viSvAksham viSva > Sambhuvam | ViSvam nArAyaNam dEvamaksharam paramam prabhum| ..... > till SO<a>ksharaH paramassvarAt| " becomes relevant to the > discussion {whether this nArAyaNa anuvAkkam is connected with > Dahara Vidya Or independent etc} - says Bhagavad RAmAnuja in > SrI BhAshyam. Thus, in the commentary for this sUtra, > BhAshyakArar uses nArAyaNa sabdam few times. This is referred > by SrI PerukkAraN^ai swAmi here. VyAsar has not mentioned > " nArAyaNa " sabdam in Brahma SUtras. Thanks very much for this clarification . I appreciate very much your careful reading of the postings and adding value. AnDAL thiruvaDigaLE SaraNam Sarvam KrishNArpaNam RaamAnuja Daasan , V.SatakOpan Quote
Guest guest Posted December 23, 2000 Report Posted December 23, 2000 Dear Members, > (3) In Sri BhAshyam , AchArya RaamAnujA did not > use the Naamams of NaarAyanan, VaasudEvan , KrishNan , > Raaman et al. He used the saamAnya sabdhams like > ParamAthmA , Para Brahmam instead . Vyasar , the Brahama- > SoothrakArar used NaarAyana sabdham only in > Linga bhUyasthvAthi adhikaraNam. The linga-bhUyastvAthi adhikaraNam is in the third adyAyam third pAdam in brahma sUtra composed by Bhagavath vEda vyAsa. It is the 19th adhikaraNam in the above mentioned pAda. It is to be noted that there is only one sUtra in this adhikaraNam which is " linga-bhUyasthvAth ... baleeya: thath api " . This is the 43rd sUtra in the third chapter third pAda. This adhikaraNam is in between pradAnAdhikaraNam and pUrva-vikalpAdhikaraNam. The above quoted words of SrI SatakOpan swAmy are explained by adiyEn as follows to avoid a presumable contradiction/deviation in this context. " sahasra-Seersha dEvamithyathra nArAyaNa SabdEna prakrutha dahara vidyOpAsya mAthram na viSEshyathE | api thu sarva para vidyAsUpAsyam | thanchinha bhUtha vAkya bhUyasthvAdEva | akshara-Siva-Sambhu-parabrahmAdi Sabdai: sarvOpAsyAnanUdya nArAyaNathvam hi vidheeyathE | prakaraNAddhi vAkyam baleeya: | thadapi Sruthi-lingEthyAdinOktham | " - Bhagavath rAmAnuja yatirAja swAmy, vEdAntha sAram In the thaiththreeyakam, the anuvAkam starting with " sahasra seersham dEvam " identifies the para-brahman as nArAyaNa:. The subject (vishayam) is regarding upAysa-vasthu-dEvatha viSEsham. The identification of the dEvatha who is to be meditated upon by the vidyA nishtas following dahara vidyA and other vidyAs mentioned in the upanishads. The doubt (samSayam) is " as the dahara vidyA is told here in this context, is the upAysa is held as nArAyaNa: only in this vidyA or the same dEvatha is held as upAsya in all the vidyAs? " The opponent view (pUrva-paksham) is " nArAyaNa is meditated upon only in dahara vidyA " . The establised truth (sidhdAntham) is " nArAyaNa is the only dEvatha known through all the common names like akshara, Siva, Sambhu: etc.,; This does NOT mean that pArvathi-pathi etc known popularly as " Siva, Sambu " etc is nArAyaNa. But these are names of nArAyaNa. The Sruthi has told the upAsya by various common names like these in various prakaraNams and then has clearly identified the upAsya vasthu by the proper (particular) noun nArAyaNa. nArAyaNa is the purushOththama: parama-purusha: denoted in the purusha sUktha - " sahasra Seersha purusha: ... hreeScha thE LakshmeeScha pathniow " - nArAyaNa is LakshmI pathi. The order of pramANams is Sruthi lingam, vAkyam, prakaraNam, sthAnam, samAkya. Of these pramANams, the former pramANam is prabalam (powerful, strong, well known & distinguished to establish) than the latter pramANam in the order listed. Therefore, compared to the prakaraNam, vAkyam is more prabalam. This is clearly establised in pUrva-mImAmsa itself (the order or pramANams and their prabala-durbala vishayam). Therefore the artha-nirNayam (ascertaining of the purport) is done here by the vAkya-balam. It is ascertained here that SrIman nArAyaNa alone is declared by the Sruthi to be meditated upon as upAsya by all upAsakas - that is in all vidyAs. It is to be noted here that the mukthAnAm parama gathi is also the same SrIman nArAyaNa. The dahara vidya in this context does not restrict this upAsya only to itself by prakaraNA pramANam alone; instead it means that the same nArAyaNa is meditated upon here in this vidyA also. Therefore, by vAkya pramANam, purport is very easily ascertained that the only God nArAyaNa is the only upAsya in all the vidyAs mentioned in the Sruthi-Siras, which are upanishads. The benefit (prayOjanam) is " the upAsya vasthu dEvatha viSEsham is ascertained in the Sruthi for all vidyAs as SrIman NArAyaNa, who is the unparalleled and unsurpassed supreme self, the jagath kAraNa vasthu " The gOdA-sudhA-swAdam (a commentary on our thAyAr AndAL's divine TiruppAvai) (page 124, 5th paragraph, " keesu keesu " pAsura vyAkyAnam) mentions that " Bhagavath rAmAnuja (SrI BhAshya kAra: EmperumAnAr) did not use the names like nArAyaNa:, vAsudEva:, krishNa:, rAma: in his SrI BhAshya; but used only the sAmAnya sabdams-common-names denoting nArAyaNa; the sUtra kAra (Bhagavath vEda vyAsa:) also did the same thing. But only in linga-bhUyastvAthi adhikaraNam (ie., in SrI BhAsya) the name nArAyaNa: is used. But our thAyAr AndAL uses this divine name three times (in her tiruppAvai). (nArAyaNanE namkkE parai tharuvAn, nArAyaNan mUrthy kEsavanai pAdavum, nAtRath-thuzhAi mudi nArAyaNan). Find it in mUla mantram and dwaya mantram " (the nArAyaNa sabdam occurs three times in the rahasya trayam) Now, let us visit the statement of SrI SatakOpan swAmy again: > Vyasar , the Brahama- > SoothrakArar used NaarAyana sabdham only in > Linga bhUyasthvAthi adhikaraNam. Though linga-bhUyastvAthi adhikaraNa sUtra is not having the name, knowing this the scholars have written like this. This means that only Bhagavath rAmAnuja YatirAja swAmy ascertained the sUtrakAra's hrudayam - Therefore, only one person has written commentary on Brahma sUtra. That one and only person is the divine incarnation of SrImath Adi SEsha who is our Bhagavath rAmAnuja yatirAja swAmy. The one and only commentary on Brahma sUtra is SrI BhAsyam. I thank and appreciate our SrI SatakOpan swAmy for sharing the wonderful English translations of portions of the extraordinary commentary gOdA-sudhA-swAdam. After reading some of the original text portions from gOdA-sudhA-swAdam, I feel that it is looking like a wonderful commentary on SrImath abhinava dESika U.Ve.UtthamUr VeerarAghavAchArya swAmy's prabanda-rakshai which is available for TiruppAvai also. I will appreciate comments from (traditional) ubhaya vEdAntha vidwAns. Thanks & Regards M.S.HARI rAmAnuja dAsan. __________________ Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.