Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org
Sign in to follow this  
Guest guest

query

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

SrI:

SrImatE rAmAnujAya nama:

SrImatE SrI LakshmI-nrusimha divya pAdhukA sEvaka

SrIvan SaThakOpa

SrI nArAyana yatIndra mahA dESikAya nama:

 

Dear Sow. B.Shoba,

 

namO nArAyaNa!

 

His Holiness The Jeeyar of SrI Ahobila mutt, SrImad

Azhagiya Singar in his book SrI Vishnu purAnam

(translation of SrI Vishnu purAna in Tamil) answers

your questions very clearly. This book (actually

printed in two volumes) enshrines so much precious

informatian ( presented in simple and easy Tamil for

everyone to understand) that every SrI VaishnavA

needs to know and follow. aDiyEn requests you to buy

and read this great book. This book can ordered via

internet from http://www.ahobilamutt.org

 

aDiyEn will try to brief the relevent portion of the

book viz. Canto 2 Chapter 6 (pages 292 to 298 of

Volume I). Please excuse any errors in aDiyEn's free

translation of these excerpts. aDiyEn requests

bAgavathAs to correct any error in his translation.

 

---------

 

Partake food with others

------------------------

 

SrI Vishnu purAnam says that the one who eats any

tasty foodstuff alone (and the one one who does

'sAhasa' activities) attains a kind of naraka (hell)

called " bhUyavaham " (hope I spelled it correct!). This

is a place where one can not even stand for a second

because of the stench that's pervaded there. So, we

should eat any good food sharing with others.

 

Like this, there are many sinful activities that lead

one to many different kind of hells.

 

Sins and the ways of expiation

------------------------------

 

SrI Vishnu purAnAm also says that only the one, who

does not want to

atone for / expiate his sins by doing

'prAyacchittams', goes to the hells. Like the sins,

the prAyachchittams also are many. According to the

gravity of sins, the prAyachchittam may be harder or

easier.

 

Sarva pApa prAyachchittam

-------------------------

 

It is hard to find these prAchchittams and it is

harder to execute them. Even if we could execute it

successfully, it absolves only the sin for which we

did the prAyachchittam. Moreover, it will not prevent

us from doing the sins in the future. Unlike these

kind of prAchchittams, there one prAyachchittam

available. That (1) is very easy to do; (2) absolves

all the sins done so far; (3) prevents us from doing

the sins in the future. That is 'KrishNa-anu-smaranam'

( meditating of Lord SrI Krishna). This is greater

than all the prAchchittams like fasting, doing

penances, yAgyams, etc.

 

prAyaSchiththAnyaSEshANi thapa:karmAthkAni vai |

yAni thEshAm aSEshANAm krishNAnusmaraNam param ||

 

Thus Sage SrI parASarar explains the greatness of SrI

krishNAnusmaranam.

 

We should meditate on SrI KrishnA with the thought

that we are His servants. The upaSarkA 'anu' in

'anusmaraNam' emphasizes SEshatvaanusanthAnam (feeling

the servitude). Likewise, SrI krishna nAmA sankirtanam

is also a great prAyaSchittam. We can understand that

the glories of SrI krishnA is greater than that of the

other avatAras by the shAstrAs specifically dictating

that we should meditate / chant on SrI krishnA.

 

Not doing sins is the best. But if we have done any

sin, we should feel sorry for that and strive for not

doing it again. Such kind of intense feelings, even

felt once, themselves are good atonements for the

sins. By feeling sorry for any sin repeatedly, we can

prevent us doing it again. We already have accrued

many sins that are powerful enough to excite us to do

many more sins. But repeted SrI krishNAnusmaranam will

destroy the power of the past sins.

 

To do the other prAyaSchittam, there is a stern

necessity of proper time, suitable place, etc. For SrI

krishNAnusmarnam, there is no such requirements. We

can think / meditate on SrIman nArAyaNa at any time.

Only upon successful completion of the other

prAyaSchittams, one's sins will be destroyed (at a

later time). But it is not so in the case of SrI

krisnAnusmaranam. While doing (ie thinking of Lord SrI

Krishna) itself, one gets rid of his sins. " samsmara~n

satya: pApa~kshyam avApnOti' - maharshi uses the

present tense here.

 

SrI krishnAnusamaranam, nAma sankIrtanam, et al will

lead one to take up the two upAyAs of mOkshA viz.,

bakthi-yOgA or prapatti as well.

Hence, they also are causes for one to attain the

highest perfection mOkshA.

 

---------

 

Hope this helps you.

 

SrImad Azhagiya Singar goes on explaining the

greatness of these prAyaSchittams elaborately in his

own inimitable style. It will be very much more

delectable to read the book to get clearer

understanding of the answers to your questions and

many more.

 

namO nArAyaNa!

 

aDiyEn,

LakshmIkumAr rAmAnuja dAsan

SrImad Azhagiya Singar thiruvadigalE saranam!

 

 

 

 

bhakti-list, bath sobha <sbath2000>

wrote:

> Respected Members of the group,

>

> Namo Narayanaya,

>

> I shall be very thankful if elders and learned

> members of the group could clarify my following

query:

>

> It is not uncommon to find a person(male or female)

> devoted to Sri Vaishnavism and residing either in

> India or abroad is forced to live a single life by

> virtue of circumstances or job. I have read in one

of

> the e-mails in these columns that it is a great sin

to

> cook and eat alone.The above mentioned people are

> compelled to eat and cook alone for majority of

their

> time in the house.If such a living is a dosham, is

> there any

> method for eg. spiritually that is advocated in the

> saastras to circumvent the dosham.?

>

> (2) Will serving cooked food to birds or other

> animals before such a person sits down to eat can be

> considered as a solution to the problem?

> (3) Are such single people permitted to do dhyana,

> puja considering the fact that no other person lives

> with him/her?

>

> Thanking one and all ,

>

> With pranamams,

> B.Sobha

 

 

 

 

Send FREE Valentine eCards with Greetings!

http://greetings.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

SrI:

 

Dear Sriman Deepak :

 

Your query is most welcome .

To the best of my knowledge , there is no any English

Translation of Adhi Sankara's moving prayer acknowledging

Lord NarasimhA's Omnipotence and request to come to his

rescue at acritical moment in His young life . There have been

other instances ( KapaalikA's attempt on Adhi Sankara's life)

when Lord Narasimha came to his devotee's rescue .

 

There is also another moving Sri Lakshmi Nrusimha

KarAvalampa sthOthram by HH the 44th pattam Azhagiya Singar ,

Sri MukkUr Azhagiya Singar . I will also cover them . Lot of Sri Narasimha

BhakthAs might be interested in these two SthOthrams . Hence I am

copying this mail to a wider set of devotees .

 

V.Sadagopan

 

 

 

-

" kambam deepak " <kambamdeepak

<sgopan

Thursday, August 25, 2005 3:27 AM

Query

 

 

>

> Sri

>

> Srimathe rangapriya mahadesikaya namaha

>

> dear respected mama,

>

> wanted to know where i can find the translation or the esoteric meaning of

> Sri Lakshmi Narasimha karavalambam stotram composed by Sri Adi Shankarar..

>

> ramanuja dasan

>

> kambam deepak

>

> _______________

> A Mobile Phone sells every 16 minutes on eBay.in…

> http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/4686-26272-10936-558?ck=Mobiles Get Your

> Model Now!

>

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Respected swamins,Will any one enlighten adiyen me on the following.1.Lord Krishna says' Anth kale Cha mam ekam saranam vrija'- meaning 'at the last moment also surrender unto me alone'Prabhandam says, ' Naman thamargal nalindu ennai patrumbodu nan unnai ninaikamattenappodaiku ippode solli vaithen Arangatharavanai palliyane'. In One we pray Lord Ranganatha that 'I can not think of YOU in my last moment ,so I thinkof you now.for our Moksham.But Lord Krishna expects to think of Him at the last moment also for Moksham.Pl enlighten.2.In Mahabharat Lord Krishna takes away ' from Karna all his darma palan which protects him and then tells Arjuna to send his asthra to kill Karna.But ' Is not giving away one's punya is the supreme punya and palan only multiplies and it should

have protected karna? Adiyen Rangarajan.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Sri:

 

Sir,

 

Let me try to share my thoughts on question 1. An answer to this may

lie in the six words provided by Lord Varadaraja to Thirukachi Nambi.

Thirukachi Nambi was one of the early teachers of Sri Ramanuja and a

disciple of Alavandar. Thirukachi Nambi had the unique distinction of

conversing with Lord Varadaraja of Kanchipuram. Ramanuja had a few

questions and requested Thirukachi Nambi to pose those questions to

Lord Varadaraja. The answers provided by Lord Varadaraja is popularly

known as the six words. One of the words provided by the lord was

antima smruthi varjanam: For a prappanan , last rememberence of the

lord is not necessary.

 

AN another important point I should have made in the beginning itself

is the fact that, according to followers of Ramanuja SIddhantam ,

moksham is not attained through Jnanam or knowledge. Moksham is

attined through surrender or Prapatti. So this implies that there is

less need for a prapannan to control his senses and perform the

necessary yogas which Lord Krishna was talking about. The prabndham

citation which you had provided alludes to surrender at the feet of

ranganatha as a means to attain moksham.

 

 

I hope this helps. I will be glad to hear the thoughts of others.

 

 

Best

Dasan

 

Gautam

 

 

, Rangarajan L <lriyengar wrote:

>

> Respected swamins,

>

> Will any one enlighten adiyen  me on the  following.

>

> 1.Lord Krishna says' Anth kale Cha mam ekam saranam vrija'- meaning 

'at the last moment also surrender unto me alone'

> Prabhandam says, ' Naman thamargal nalindu ennai patrumbodu nan

unnai ninaikamatten

> appodaiku ippode solli vaithen Arangatharavanai palliyane'.

>  In One  we pray Lord Ranganatha  that 'I can not think of YOU in my

last moment ,so I thinkof you now.for our Moksham.But Lord Krishna

expects to think of Him at the last moment also for Moksham.

> Pl enlighten.

>

> 2.In Mahabharat Lord Krishna takes away ' from Karna  all his darma 

palan which protects him and then tells Arjuna to send his asthra to

kill Karna.But ' Is not  giving away one's punya is the supreme punya

and palan only multiplies and it should have protected karna?

>

> Adiyen

> Rangarajan.

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

SwAmin, According to Sri rahasyatrayasAram, the last remembrance of the Lord,

which is a Vedic rule, has not been done away with as any vedic instruction

cannot be be annulled. What was conveyed by Sri Tirukacchi Nambi to Acharya Sri

Ramanuja is that for a prapanna, there is no need of self-effort to remember the

Lord at the moment of deah. It is taken care of by the Lord as He takes the full

responsibility to fulfill all the requirements as specified by the Vedas. Achaya

Sri Vedanta Dsikan says it is known between the Lord and the prapanna and others

who are near the dying prapanna will not know this. The point is that a vedic

instruction is not ignored by even the Lord. Hence, PeriyAzhvAr's pAsuram,

referred to, stands valid as the instrucion of Si Krishna in the Gita too is.

Regards,

dAsan

Anbil Srinivasan

 

 

From Chandigarh to Chennai - find friends all over India. Go to

http://in.promos./groups/citygroups/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

SRIMATE RAMANUJAYA NAMAHA

It is true that untakala smriti is necessary.but for prapanna,Lord says in VARAHA charama shloka that one who chants my name when he is healthy,i will remember him & take him to my abode.Here acharyas comment that when the lord remembers a jeeva,the jeeva is bound to remember the lord on the deathbed & hence fulfill lord's requirement in Gita.

dasan

 

On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 Rangarajan L wrote :

>Respected swamins,

>

>Will any one enlighten adiyen me on the following.

>

>1.Lord Krishna says' Anth kale Cha mam ekam saranam vrija'- meaning 'at the last moment also surrender unto me alone'

>Prabhandam says, ' Naman thamargal nalindu ennai patrumbodu nan unnai ninaikamatten

>appodaiku ippode solli vaithen Arangatharavanai palliyane'.

> In One we pray Lord Ranganatha that 'I can not think of YOU in my last moment ,so I thinkof you now.for our Moksham.But Lord Krishna expects to think of Him at the last moment also for Moksham.

>Pl enlighten.

>

>2.In Mahabharat Lord Krishna takes away ' from Karna all his darma palan which protects him and then tells Arjuna to send his asthra to kill Karna.But ' Is not giving away one's punya is the supreme punya and palan only multiplies and it should have protected karna?

>

>Adiyen

>Rangarajan.

>

>

>

>

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Dear Swamin,

1.Lord Krishna says' Anth kale Cha mam ekam saranam vrija'- Where is this? 

Not in the Bhagavadgita.

 

 

Perhaps you meant this verse:

 

 

anta kaale cha maam eva 

smaran muktvaa kaLevaram|

yah prayaati sa madbhaavam

yaati naastyatra samshayah ||BG8-5||

 

 

5Those who think

only about me even at the time of death 

will undoubtedly attain my state; they will

certainly be united with me! 

 

 

 

 then he follows it with:

 

 

 

6Whatever the state of

mind that prevails at the time of death, that very state one will attain,  

because, those thoughts truly are a

reflection of the kind of life one has lived! 

(Remember JaDa Bahrata's metaphor- he got attached to a fawn and

 that is what he became)

7Therefore,  at all times, remember me even in combat.

With your mind and intellect fixed on me, 

you surely will come to me only.  

 

 

If you look at the context here, it becomes quite clear. Lord's advise is for us to make it a habit

of being connected with the Lord always. This is not a requirement for moksham, but only advice. 

 If this is not possible, of course we have the charama shlokam (BG18-66). Just surrender!

 

 

 

 

 

>2.In Mahabharat Lord Krishna takes away ' from Karna  all his darma  palan which protects him and then tells Arjuna to send his asthra to kill Karna.But ' Is not  giving away one's punya is the supreme punya and palan only multiplies and it should have protected karna?

>

Karna deserved what he got. Remember, Krishna treats people as they deserve to be treated.

He is no fool like Bheeshma,  Gandhi or Nehru, who failed to  treat others as they deserved to be treated.

The way Karna behaved, when Draupadi was being disrobed, he deserved nothing less than death at the

right time- Karna also did not listen to Krishna's advice (not to fight on Kaurava side).

Karna has been made great by Shivaji Ganeshan!

 

 

dAsan

 

 

K.S. tAtAchAr

 

 

 

 

Vasan Sriranga Chari <vasan_chari_hk

Rangarajan L <lriyengar

Cc:

Sat, 28 Jun 2008 8:50 am

Re: query

 

 

 

 

SRIMATE RAMANUJAYA NAMAHA

It is true that untakala smriti is necessary.but for prapanna,Lord says in  VARAHA charama shloka that one who chants my name when he is healthy,i will remember him & take him to my abode.Here acharyas comment that when the lord remembers a jeeva,the jeeva is bound to remember the lord on the deathbed & hence fulfill lord's requirement in Gita.

dasan 

 

On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 Rangarajan L wrote :

>Respected swamins,

>

>Will any one enlighten adiyen  me on the  following.

>

>1.Lord Krishna says' Anth kale Cha mam ekam saranam vrija'- meaning  'at the last moment also surrender unto me alone'

>Prabhandam says, ' Naman thamargal nalindu ennai patrumbodu nan unnai ninaikamatten

>appodaiku ippode solli vaithen Arangatharavanai palliyane'.

>  In One  we pray Lord Ranganatha  that 'I can not think of YOU in my last moment ,so I thinkof you now.for our Moksham.But Lord Krishna expects to think of Him at the last moment also for Moksham.

>Pl enlighten.

>

>2.In Mahabharat Lord Krishna takes away ' from Karna  all his darma  palan which protects him and then tells Arjuna to send his asthra to kill Karna.But ' Is not  giving away one's punya is the supreme punya and palan only multiplies and it should have protected karna?

>

>Adiyen

>Rangarajan.

>

>

>

>

>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Get the Moviefone Toolbar. Showtimes, theaters, movie news, more!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

The conviction that the Supreme Being is the Sole Ruler and Protector of this world applies in all cases. It is not so much a case of destiny; it is He and He Alone who guides all through this life and thus, serves as both the result and the action that leads to that result.Some He deems should know Him as being everything, the Way, the Goal, and the One who makes us aware of these. Others know Him to be the Goal, but cannot understand that it is He Who is the Goal, but do not see Him as being the Way. Others do not even know Him, limiting their search for the Divine to other deities, or perhaps god-men as mere kamya-phalam. And then, there are those beings, both human and otherwise, who could care less about the Divine. But, these complex natures that are the product of the Gunas that He creates in us are His Design, and they have nothing to do with His Desire to Save. So, our knowledge of Him does nothing to save us; it is a gift that He provides to those whom He deems require it.

 

I hope this helps.

 

iramanusan adiyen

Mohan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

ramanuja , Mohan <mohan0128 wrote:

>

> The conviction that the Supreme Being is the Sole Ruler and Protector of

> this world applies in all cases. It is not so much a case of destiny; it is

> He and He Alone who guides all through this life and thus, serves as both

> the result and the action that leads to that result.

>

> Some He deems should know Him as being everything, the Way, the Goal, and

> the One who makes us aware of these. Others know Him to be the Goal, but

> cannot understand that it is He Who is the Goal, but do not see Him as being

> the Way. Others do not even know Him, limiting their search for the Divine

> to other deities, or perhaps god-men as mere kamya-phalam.

>

> And then, there are those beings, both human and otherwise, who could care

> less about the Divine. But, these complex natures that are the product of

> the Gunas that He creates in us are His Design, and they have nothing to do

> with His Desire to Save. So, our knowledge of Him does nothing to save

> us; it is a gift that He provides to those whom He deems require it.

>

> I hope this helps.

>

> iramanusan adiyen

> Mohan

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...