Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org
Sign in to follow this  
Guest guest

MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Dear TinWin,

 

Nice reply & many thanks.

 

Regards,

 

D.Senthil--- On Sun, 12/6/09, TW <tw853 wrote:

TW <tw853Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years... Date: Sunday, December 6, 2009, 7:25 AM

 

Dear Friends,

1. Mars dosha has been written in the KP Reader IV (Marriage, Married Life & Children) pages 51-69 (any Edition of reprinting). 2. Page 52, second and third parasOne may ask, "Why should they attach so much importance to the position of Mars alone? .......The reply is that there are some people who unnessarily exaggerate the evil results of Mars.....3. Page 55, third paraLet me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion.4. Page 69 fourth para It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise on the correct match. 5. Up to the above para is reprinted from the early writtings in the Krishnamurti Padhdhati Vol II, Sagar publications, 1966.6. Page 69 fourth to sixth paras are added in the mentioned KP Reader IV, first published in May 1971; fourth para is as given under:To cause difference of opinion,disagreemen t, dispute, divorce etc. among the couple it is not left to Mars alone, any planet can cause such undesirable effect provided they happen to be deposited in such a position, that the sublord of the planet is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 or the sublord is deposited in a constellation, the lord of which is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12. 7. In KP, marriage matching, like education, occupation,death, is supposed to be predestined. 8. The speculative ideas would be sound, if and only if supported by a research study of sufficient numbers of charts other than here say experience or opinion.

Thanks and regards,TW@gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:>> Dear Tw ji,> > I personally feel that the study missed few very basic but important points> and I would like to mention the same -> > 1. Problems due to Mars Dosha, tradionally as well as narrated by Shri KSK (> http://logy. astrosage. com/mars- dosha), occurs only when the husband> and wife do not have same level of dosha. The problem exists only if a> person having Mars dosha marries to the person who doesn't have Mars dosha> (even if we ignore level of dosha). The study seems to consider> only individual's chart and not two charts together. If it is studying> only individual's chart, the study doesn't have much meaning. A study needs> to see Mars dosha in two situation and compare - a) mars dosha person> marriying to mars dosha

person, b) mars dosha person not marring to Mars> dosha person. Till the time we compare this two situation, how come we> conclude whether Mars Dosha works or not.> > 2. Traditonally as well as according to Shri KSK, Mars dosha should be> checked from Ascendant, Moon and Venus. It seems that study is considering> only Ascedant and ignoring Moon and Venus. Again, if we do not follow the> definition properly, the conclusion reached can not be called correct.> > Here is the conclusion from your article -> "It is to follow the KP rules only in considering longevity, matching,> separation, divorce, multi-marriage, happy or unhappy married life etc.> without mixing up with the traditional Manglik-to- Manglik matching rule and> explain the public not to worry about Mars Dosha as suggested by Shri K.> Hariharan."> > Here again it seems that we are

mixing up two things. KP does NOT provide> any tool for chart matching and Mars dosha is a tool for matching and not> for prediction. KP clearly gives the rule for longevity etc., but doesn't> tell much about matching two charts. There is no doubt that KP is dependent> on traditional methods of horoscope matching as far as KP readers are> concerned. This is the reason Koota as well as Mars dosha found place in KP.> In my opinion, the study is about Mars dosha as a predictive tool (which is> not discussed by Shri KSK) and NOT Mars dosha as a matching tool (which is> discussed by Shri KSK).> > Thanks & Regards,> > Punit Pandey> > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:51 PM, TW tw853 wrote:> > >> >> > Dear Friends,> > What has been found is in the File section under:> > MARS DOSHA IN KP.doc>

> Regards,> > TW> >> >> > @gro ups.com <%40g roups.com>, Punit> > Pandey punitp@ wrote:> > >> > > Dear Friends,> > >> > > Here is what is found in third reader -> > >> > > http://logy. astrosage. com/mars- dosha> > >> > > Thanks & Regards,> > >> > > Punit Pandey> > >> > >> > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Ramani kadavasalramani@ wrote:> > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Shri Bansalj,> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Any kind of Mars Dosha including the Mars in 4th fron Lagna or Moon or> > > > Venus gets cancelled when Mars is aspected by

Saturn.> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Truly yours,> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > K.S.V.Ramani> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > ** @gro ups.com <%40g roups.com>[> > @gro ups.com <%40g roups.com>] *On> > > > Behalf Of *pankaj bansal> > > > *Sent:* 04 December 2009 22:50> > > >> > > > *To:* @gro ups.com <%40g roups.com>> > > > *Subject:* Re: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the> > years...> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >

> >> > > > Namaste Lajmiji,> > > >> > > > If Mars is placed In 4th house from> > > > Lagna & Venus and Placed in POORVASHADA Nakshatra(Venus) .Then there is No> > So> > > > called Mars dosha and the Native Can Marriage anybody who had or had> > not> > > > mars dosha in this Birth Chart?Eagerly waiting for your precious> > response.> > > >> > > > Thanks> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > ** Yogesh Lajmi yogeshlajmi@> > > >> > > > *To:* @gro ups.com <%40g roups.com>> > > > *Cc:* Punit Pandey punitp@> > > > *Sent:* Fri, 4 December, 2009 8:05:18 PM> >> > >

> *Subject:* MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Members,> > > >> > > > Not withstanding what has been averred by some "K.P.> > > > research scholars",> > > >> > > > and whose research has been qestioned already in these columns by many> > KP> > > > followers,> > > >> > > > *and also,*my own experience about Mars Dosha,over the years,and after> > > > analysing the charts of many a married couples,for marital> > > > problems,especially ,after marriage,I agree 100% with the observation> > in> > > > K.P. books that *Mars posited in Sun's star,or own star,and occuping> > > > houses I,II,IV,VII, VIII & XII** **alone causes

Mars Dosha**...*> > > >> > > > I invite the opinion of all members...on this very> > > > controversial matter,and I must add here that almost ALL of my clients> > who> > > > come to consult me,strongly believe about the existence of Mars> > Dosha...so> > > > much so that they attribute almost every domestic problem to the> > existence> > > > of Mars Dosha,and keep asking for *"remedies". . .* !> > > >> > > > Which I patiently have to explain in detail...based> > > > on their own experience in the practise of the K.P. System...> > > >> > > > This is just to illustrate how deeply the ill-effects> > > > of Mars are embedded in the minds of people,at large...> > > >> > > > Am looking forward to comments from

discerning> > > > members...> > > >> > > > With kind regards,> > > >> > > > Yogesh Lajmi.> > > >> > > > * *> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > Win 1 of 4 Sony home entertainment packs thanks to 7. Enter now<> > http://us.lrd. / _ylc=X3oDMTJxN2x 2ZmNpBF9zAzIwMjM 2MTY2MTMEdG1fZG1 lY2gDVGV4dCBMaW5 rBHRtX2xuawNVMTE wMzk3NwR0bV9uZXQ DWWFob28hBHRtX3B vcwN0YWdsaW5lBHR tX3BwdHkDYXVueg- -/SIG=14600t3ni/ **http%3A/ au.rd.. com/mail/ tagline/sony/ *http%3A/ au.docs.. com/homepageset/ %3Fp1=other% 26p2=au%26p3= mailtagline> > >> > > > .> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > >

>> > > > The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage<> > http://in.rd. / tagline_yyi_ 1/*http:/ in.. com/>> > > > .> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Deare Punit,

In K.P. Reader IV..."Marriage Married Life & Children" this subject is discussed in Detail,with examples...You may inform TW this..

With kind regards,

Yogesh Lajmi

 

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp Sent: Mon, 7 December, 2009 5:10:38 PMRe: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

 

Dear Tw ji,

 

The discussion is not fair from your side. You asked a question and I responded by saying 'No'. I also asked quite a few questions and I didn't get response and what I get is another question in reply. I am reproducing one such question my my last email -

 

> By the way, will you agree, though, that this is the conclusion by Shri KSK> on the Mars dosha article (in 1966 edition)? -> "It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh and> consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise on> the correct match."

 

You should answer first and then only ask further question.

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 5:02 PM, TW <tw853 > wrote:

 

 

 

Dear Punit ji,Is there any astrologer publishing an article with example charts on working of Mars dosha in the KP literature like A & A, K.P. & Astrology? Thanks and regards,TW@gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:>> Dear Tw ji,>

> No, as I mentioned earlier, KP readers have only traditional methods for> "Horoscope Matching". KP might not have used Mars dosha, but saying that it> doesn't work require further study. And this is simply the point that we can> not discard that we have not verified yet.> > By the way, will you agree, though, that this is the conclusion by Shri KSK> on the Mars dosha article (in 1966 edition)? -> "It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh and> consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise on> the correct match."> > Thanks & Regards,> > Punit Pandey> >

> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 1:50 AM, TW <tw853 wrote:> > >> >> > Dear Punit ji,> > Have you come across any practical article on working of Mars dosha in the> > whole KP literature?> >> > Thanks and regards,> > TW> >

> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>, Punit> > Pandey <punitp@> wrote:> > >> > > Dear Tw ji,> > >> > > In my earlier emails, I was neither claiming nor promising any study. I> > was> > > just communicating that the exiting study doesn't cover "Mars dosha for> > > marriage matching" - the primary application of Mard dosha. My objective> > was> > > to clarify the scope of the existing study and I am happy that I have> > shared> > > my understanding with the forum.> > >> > > Thanks & Regards,> > >> > > Punit

Pandey> > >> > >> > > On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 10:16 PM, TW <tw853@> wrote:> > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Punit ji,> > > >> > > > Any practical study on your understanding would be helpful to the forum> > for> > > > seeing to be believing.> > > >> > > > Thanks and regards,> > > > TW> > > >> > > > @gro ups.com <%40. com><%

 

> > 40. com>, Punit> > > > Pandey <punitp@> wrote:> > > > >> > > > > Dear Tw ji,> > > > >> > > > > 1. Please tell clearly whether you are saying that 1966 is more> > > > authentic or> > > > > 1971. I do not understand the reason for initial 6 points.> > > > > 2. Even in 1971 edition, when we say that ".... it can not be left to> > > > Mars> > > > > alone", it clearly means that Mars has impact, but it is not the> > "only"> > > > > reason. Shri KSK were very clear about the impact of Mars dosha and> > that> > > > is> > > > > the rason instead of rejecting it (which he has done quite often

in> > > > readers> > > > > for some other theories like Ashtakvarga) , he said that this is not> > the> > > > > reason "alone."> > > > > 3. Regarding point 7, the question is not whether everything is> > > > pre-destined> > > > > or not. The question is whether it is correct to check Mars dosha on> > > > > indiviaul's chart where Shri KSK clearly mentioned it for> > compatibility> > > > > matching. Any conclusion drawn without considered both the partner's> > > > > horoscope seems incomplete to me and against what Shri KSK has> > mentioned> > > > > about it.> > > > > 4. You also didn't answer my question, whether Moon and Venus were> > > > > considered or not, apart from Ascendant, in the study? We

must> > remember> > > > that> > > > > Shri KSK clearly mentioned about inclusion of Moon and Venus with> > > > Ascendant> > > > > while judging Mars dosha.> > > > > 5. What ideas you are finding speculative? I am just quoting what> > Shri> > > > KSK> > > > > has said and what proof you need more than what Shri KSK has said> > > > himself.> > > > >> > > > > My objections and questions doesn't mean that I am try to belittle> > the> > > > > study. The study is useful and establish that Mars dosha has limited> > or> > > > no> > > > > value when it comes to predicting disagreement, dispute, and divorce> > etc.> > > > in> > > > > marriage. It is a

good and useful finding. Though the study doesn't> > tell> > > > > anything about Mars dosha compatibility and we should be very clear> > about> > > > > it. Most of the problems are said when Mars dosha doesn't match in> > bride> > > > and> > > > > groom's chart and this is the utility of this theory in Hindu> > astrology> > > > (and> > > > > Indian families). Also, in future study must be extended to include> > Moon> > > > and> > > > > Venus, so that it can test the real definition of Mars dosha and not> > just> > > > an> > > > > incomplete definition of Mars dosha. Till the time the scope of study> > is> > > > > clear, people may confuse and think that Mars dosha is match making>

> > > doesn't> > > > > exist which is actually not convered in the study.> > > > >> > > > > Thanks & Regards,> > > > >> > > > > Punit Pandey> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 8:55 PM, TW <tw853@> wrote:> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Friends,> > > > > >> > > > > > 1. Mars dosha has been written in the KP Reader IV (Marriage,> > Married> > > > Life> > > > > > & Children) pages 51-69 (any Edition of reprinting).> > > > > > 2. Page 52, second and third paras> > > > > > One may ask, "Why should they attach so much importance to

the> > position> > > > of> > > > > > Mars alone? .......> > > > > > The reply is that there are some people who unnessarily exaggerate> > the> > > > evil> > > > > > results of Mars.....> > > > > > 3. Page 55, third para> > > > > > Let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer> > my> > > > > > opinion.> > > > > > 4. Page 69 fourth para> > > > > > It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh> > and> > > > > > consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and> > > > advise on> > > > > > the correct match.> > > > > > 5. Up to the above para is reprinted from the early

writtings in> > the> > > > > > Krishnamurti Padhdhati Vol II, Sagar publications, 1966.> > > > > > 6. Page 69 fourth to sixth paras are added in the mentioned KP> > Reader> > > > IV,> > > > > > first published in May 1971; fourth para is as given under:> > > > > > To cause difference of opinion,disagreemen t, dispute, divorce etc.> > > > among> > > > > > the couple it is not left to Mars alone, any planet can cause such> > > > > > undesirable effect provided they happen to be deposited in such a> > > > position,> > > > > > that the sublord of the planet is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12> > or> > > > the> > > > > > sublord is deposited in a constellation, the lord of which is

the> > > > > > significator of 6 or 10 or 12.> > > > > > 7. In KP, marriage matching, like education, occupation,death, is> > > > supposed> > > > > > to be predestined.> > > > > > 8. The speculative ideas would be sound, if and only if supported> > by a> > > > > > research study of sufficient numbers of charts other than here say> > > > > > experience or opinion.> > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks and regards,> > > > > >> > > > > > TW> > > > > >> > > > > > @gro ups.com <%40. com><%

 

> > 40. com>,> > > > Punit Pandey <punitp@> wrote:> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Dear Tw ji,> > > > > > >> > > > > > > I personally feel that the study missed few very basic but> > important> > > > > > points> > > > > > > and I would like to mention the same -> > > > > > >> > > > > > > 1. Problems due to Mars Dosha, tradionally as well as narrated by> > > > Shri> > > > > > KSK (> > > > > > > http://logy. astrosage. com/mars- dosha), occurs only when> > the> >

> > > > husband> > > > > > > and wife do not have same level of dosha. The problem exists only> > if> > > > a> > > > > > > person having Mars dosha marries to the person who doesn't have> > Mars> > > > > > dosha> > > > > > > (even if we ignore level of dosha). The study seems to consider> > > > > > > only individual's chart and not two charts together. If it is> > > > studying> > > > > > > only individual's chart, the study doesn't have much meaning. A> > study> > > > > > needs> > > > > > > to see Mars dosha in two situation and compare - a) mars dosha> > person> > > > > > > marriying to mars dosha person, b) mars dosha person not marring> >

to> > > > Mars> > > > > > > dosha person. Till the time we compare this two situation, how> > come> > > > we> > > > > > > conclude whether Mars Dosha works or not.> > > > > > >> > > > > > > 2. Traditonally as well as according to Shri KSK, Mars dosha> > should> > > > be> > > > > > > checked from Ascendant, Moon and Venus. It seems that study is> > > > > > considering> > > > > > > only Ascedant and ignoring Moon and Venus. Again, if we do not> > follow> > > > the> > > > > > > definition properly, the conclusion reached can not be called> > > > correct.> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Here is the conclusion

from your article -> > > > > > > "It is to follow the KP rules only in considering longevity,> > > > matching,> > > > > > > separation, divorce, multi-marriage, happy or unhappy married> > life> > > > etc.> > > > > > > without mixing up with the traditional Manglik-to- Manglik> > matching> > > > rule> > > > > > and> > > > > > > explain the public not to worry about Mars Dosha as suggested by> > Shri> > > > K.> > > > > > > Hariharan."> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Here again it seems that we are mixing up two things. KP does NOT> > > > provide> > > > > > > any tool for chart matching and Mars dosha is a tool for matching>

> and> > > > not> > > > > > > for prediction. KP clearly gives the rule for longevity etc., but> > > > doesn't> > > > > > > tell much about matching two charts. There is no doubt that KP is> > > > > > dependent> > > > > > > on traditional methods of horoscope matching as far as KP readers> > are> > > > > > > concerned. This is the reason Koota as well as Mars dosha found> > place> > > > in> > > > > > KP.> > > > > > > In my opinion, the study is about Mars dosha as a predictive tool> > > > (which> > > > > > is> > > > > > > not discussed by Shri KSK) and NOT Mars dosha as a matching tool> > > > (which> > > > > >

is> > > > > > > discussed by Shri KSK).> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Thanks & Regards,> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Punit Pandey> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:51 PM, TW tw853@ wrote:> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Dear Friends,> > > > > > > > What has been found is in the File section under:> > > > > > > > MARS DOSHA IN KP.doc> > > > > > > > Regards,> > > > > > > > TW> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > >

> > > @gro ups.com<%40. com><%> > 40. com><%> >> > > > 40. com>,> > > > > > Punit> > > > > >> > > > > > > > Pandey punitp@ wrote:> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Dear Friends,> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Here is what is found in third reader -> > > > > > > >

>> > > > > > > > > http://logy. astrosage. com/mars- dosha> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards,> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Ramani kadavasalramani@ wrote:> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Dear Shri Bansalj,> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> >

> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Any kind of Mars Dosha including the Mars in 4th fron Lagna> > or> > > > Moon> > > > > > or> > > > > > > > > > Venus gets cancelled when Mars is aspected by Saturn.> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Truly yours,> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > K.S.V.Ramani> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > ------------

--------- ---------> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > ** @gro ups.com<%40. com>> > <%40. com><%> > > > 40. com> > > > > > >[> > > > > > > > @gro ups.com <%40.

com><%> > 40. com><%> >> > > > 40. com>] *On> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Behalf Of *pankaj bansal> > > > > > > > > > *Sent:* 04 December 2009 22:50> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > *To:* @gro ups.com<%40. com>> > <%40.

com><%> >> > > > 40. com>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > *Subject:* Re: MARS DOSHA...my experience over> > the> > > > > > > > years...> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Namaste Lajmiji,> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > If Mars is placed In 4th house from> > > > > > > > > > Lagna & Venus and Placed in POORVASHADA Nakshatra(Venus)

..Then> > > > there> > > > > > is No> > > > > > > > So> > > > > > > > > > called Mars dosha and the Native Can Marriage anybody who> > had> > > > or> > > > > > had> > > > > > > > not> > > > > > > > > > mars dosha in this Birth Chart?Eagerly waiting for your> > > > precious> > > > > > > > response.> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Thanks> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >

** Yogesh Lajmi yogeshlajmi@> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > *To:* @gro ups.com<%40. com>> > <%40. com><%> >> > > > 40. com>> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > *Cc:* Punit Pandey punitp@> > > > > > > > > > *Sent:* Fri, 4 December, 2009 8:05:18 PM> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >

*Subject:* MARS DOSHA...my experience over the> > > > > > years...> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Dear Members,> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Not withstanding what has been averred by some "K.P.> > > > > > > > > > research scholars",> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > and whose research has been qestioned already in these> > columns> > > > by> > > > > > many> > > > > > > > KP> > > > > > > > > > followers,> > > > > > > > >

>> > > > > > > > > > *and also,*my own experience about Mars Dosha,over the> > > > years,and> > > > > > after> > > > > > > > > > analysing the charts of many a married couples,for marital> > > > > > > > > > problems,especially ,after marriage,I agree 100% with the> > > > > > observation> > > > > > > > in> > > > > > > > > > K.P. books that *Mars posited in Sun's star,or own star,and> > > > > > occuping> > > > > > > > > > houses I,II,IV,VII, VIII & XII** **alone causes Mars> > > > Dosha**...*> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > I invite the opinion of all members...on this very>

> > > > > > > > > controversial matter,and I must add here that almost ALL of> > my> > > > > > clients> > > > > > > > who> > > > > > > > > > come to consult me,strongly believe about the existence of> > Mars> > > > > > > > Dosha...so> > > > > > > > > > much so that they attribute almost every domestic problem> > to> > > > the> > > > > > > > existence> > > > > > > > > > of Mars Dosha,and keep asking for *"remedies".. .* !> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Which I patiently have to explain in detail...based> > > > > > > > > > on their own experience in the practise of the

K.P.> > System...> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > This is just to illustrate how deeply the ill-effects> > > > > > > > > > of Mars are embedded in the minds of people,at large...> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Am looking forward to comments from discerning> > > > > > > > > > members...> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > With kind regards,> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Yogesh Lajmi.> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > * *> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >

> >> > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Win 1 of 4 Sony home entertainment packs thanks to 7.> > > > Enter> > > > > > now<> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > http://us.lrd. / _ylc=X3oDMTJxN2x 2ZmNpBF9zAzIwMjM 2MTY2MTMEdG1fZG1 lY2gDVGV4dCBMaW5 rBHRtX2xuawNVMTE wMzk3NwR0bV9uZXQ DWWFob28hBHRtX3B vcwN0YWdsaW5lBHR tX3BwdHkDYXVueg-

-/SIG=14600t3ni/ **http%3A/ au.rd.. com/mail/ tagline/sony/ *http%3A/ au.docs.. com/homepageset/ %3Fp1=other% 26p2=au%26p3= mailtagline> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > .> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your > > > > > > Homepage<> > > > > > > > http://in.rd. / tagline_yyi_ 1/*http:/ in.. com/>> > > > > > > > >

> .> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >>

 

 

 

See what's on at the movies in your area. Find out now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Dear Punit ji,

1. I'm sorry for deferring to answer your question in my conclusion.2. No, no seams no practical application of Mars dosha in KP. Thank you for answers, no more question in this regard. 3. The following conclusion of fourth para, page 69 of KP Reader IV (any reprint edition) or third para, page 228 of Krishnamurti Padhdhati Vol II, Sagar publications, 1966, can not be for the KP followers to apply the Traditinal matching which has been explained before that conclusion. There is no way to apply Traditional way of matching in KP.It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise on the correct match. 4. That is why to make it clear the following three paras are added in the KP Reader IV." To cause difference of opinion,disagreemen t, dispute, divorce etc. among the couple it is not left to Mars alone, any planet can cause such undesirable effect provided they happen to be deposited in such a position, that the sublord of the planet is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 or the sublord is deposited in a constellation, the lord of which is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12."" If the same planet is also the significator of 2 or 7 or 11, then it will be only for a short period and again they unite and continue to live together." " If the sub lord is either Mars or if it is in the constellation of Mars , and if is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 , there will be separation. If it is saturn , silence and remain dumb-stick and strike. Thus we have to predict."5. It appears like indirect explanation with compared to direct change to 'Lagna alone' in KP Reader III, first published in Oct 1979, from 'Lagna or Moon whichever is stronger' (like in atyacharya's Satya Jataka, Adhyaya 1, slokas 7 to 14) earlier applied in Krishnamurti Padhdhati Vol II, Sagar publications, 1966. (point 1 of message below)/message/18330?threaded=1

Thanks and regards,TW

, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:>> Dear Tw ji,> > The discussion is not fair from your side. You asked a question and I> responded by saying 'No'. I also asked quite a few questions and I didn't> get response and what I get is another question in reply. I am reproducing> one such question my my last email -> > > By the way, will you agree, though, that this is the conclusion by Shri> KSK> > on the Mars dosha article (in 1966 edition)? -> > "It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh and> > consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise> on> > the correct match."> > You should answer first and then only ask further question.> > Thanks & Regards,> > Punit Pandey> > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 5:02 PM, TW tw853 wrote:> > >> >> > Dear Punit ji,> >> > Is there any astrologer publishing an article with example charts on> > working of Mars dosha in the KP literature like A & A, K.P. & Astrology?> >> >> > Thanks and regards,> > TW> >> > <%40>, Punit> > Pandey punitp@ wrote:> > >> > > Dear Tw ji,> > >> > > No, as I mentioned earlier, KP readers have only traditional methods for> > > "Horoscope Matching". KP might not have used Mars dosha, but saying that> > it> > > doesn't work require further study. And this is simply the point that we> > can> > > not discard that we have not verified yet.> > >> > > By the way, will you agree, though, that this is the conclusion by Shri> > KSK> > > on the Mars dosha article (in 1966 edition)? -> > > "It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh and> > > consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise> > on> > > the correct match."> > >> > > Thanks & Regards,> > >> > > Punit Pandey> > >> > >> > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 1:50 AM, TW tw853@ wrote:> > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Punit ji,> > > > Have you come across any practical article on working of Mars dosha in> > the> > > > whole KP literature?> > > >> > > > Thanks and regards,> > > > TW> > > >> > > > <%40><%> > 40>, Punit> > > > Pandey <punitp@> wrote:> > > > >> > > > > Dear Tw ji,> > > > >> > > > > In my earlier emails, I was neither claiming nor promising any study.> > I> > > > was> > > > > just communicating that the exiting study doesn't cover "Mars dosha> > for> > > > > marriage matching" - the primary application of Mard dosha. My> > objective> > > > was> > > > > to clarify the scope of the existing study and I am happy that I have> > > > shared> > > > > my understanding with the forum.> > > > >> > > > > Thanks & Regards,> > > > >> > > > > Punit Pandey> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 10:16 PM, TW <tw853@> wrote:> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Punit ji,> > > > > >> > > > > > Any practical study on your understanding would be helpful to the> > forum> > > > for> > > > > > seeing to be believing.> > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks and regards,> > > > > > TW> > > > > >> > > > > > <%40><%> > 40><%> >> > > > 40>, Punit> > > > > > Pandey <punitp@> wrote:> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Dear Tw ji,> > > > > > >> > > > > > > 1. Please tell clearly whether you are saying that 1966 is more> > > > > > authentic or> > > > > > > 1971. I do not understand the reason for initial 6 points.> > > > > > > 2. Even in 1971 edition, when we say that ".... it can not be> > left to> > > > > > Mars> > > > > > > alone", it clearly means that Mars has impact, but it is not the> > > > "only"> > > > > > > reason. Shri KSK were very clear about the impact of Mars dosha> > and> > > > that> > > > > > is> > > > > > > the rason instead of rejecting it (which he has done quite often> > in> > > > > > readers> > > > > > > for some other theories like Ashtakvarga), he said that this is> > not> > > > the> > > > > > > reason "alone."> > > > > > > 3. Regarding point 7, the question is not whether everything is> > > > > > pre-destined> > > > > > > or not. The question is whether it is correct to check Mars dosha> > on> > > > > > > indiviaul's chart where Shri KSK clearly mentioned it for> > > > compatibility> > > > > > > matching. Any conclusion drawn without considered both the> > partner's> > > > > > > horoscope seems incomplete to me and against what Shri KSK has> > > > mentioned> > > > > > > about it.> > > > > > > 4. You also didn't answer my question, whether Moon and Venus> > were> > > > > > > considered or not, apart from Ascendant, in the study? We must> > > > remember> > > > > > that> > > > > > > Shri KSK clearly mentioned about inclusion of Moon and Venus with> > > > > > Ascendant> > > > > > > while judging Mars dosha.> > > > > > > 5. What ideas you are finding speculative? I am just quoting what> > > > Shri> > > > > > KSK> > > > > > > has said and what proof you need more than what Shri KSK has said> > > > > > himself.> > > > > > >> > > > > > > My objections and questions doesn't mean that I am try to> > belittle> > > > the> > > > > > > study. The study is useful and establish that Mars dosha has> > limited> > > > or> > > > > > no> > > > > > > value when it comes to predicting disagreement, dispute, and> > divorce> > > > etc.> > > > > > in> > > > > > > marriage. It is a good and useful finding. Though the study> > doesn't> > > > tell> > > > > > > anything about Mars dosha compatibility and we should be very> > clear> > > > about> > > > > > > it. Most of the problems are said when Mars dosha doesn't match> > in> > > > bride> > > > > > and> > > > > > > groom's chart and this is the utility of this theory in Hindu> > > > astrology> > > > > > (and> > > > > > > Indian families). Also, in future study must be extended to> > include> > > > Moon> > > > > > and> > > > > > > Venus, so that it can test the real definition of Mars dosha and> > not> > > > just> > > > > > an> > > > > > > incomplete definition of Mars dosha. Till the time the scope of> > study> > > > is> > > > > > > clear, people may confuse and think that Mars dosha is match> > making> > > > > > doesn't> > > > > > > exist which is actually not convered in the study.> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Thanks & Regards,> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Punit Pandey> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 8:55 PM, TW <tw853@> wrote:> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Dear Friends,> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > 1. Mars dosha has been written in the KP Reader IV (Marriage,> > > > Married> > > > > > Life> > > > > > > > & Children) pages 51-69 (any Edition of reprinting).> > > > > > > > 2. Page 52, second and third paras> > > > > > > > One may ask, "Why should they attach so much importance to the> > > > position> > > > > > of> > > > > > > > Mars alone? .......> > > > > > > > The reply is that there are some people who unnessarily> > exaggerate> > > > the> > > > > > evil> > > > > > > > results of Mars.....> > > > > > > > 3. Page 55, third para> > > > > > > > Let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally> > offer> > > > my> > > > > > > > opinion.> > > > > > > > 4. Page 69 fourth para> > > > > > > > It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully> > weigh> > > > and> > > > > > > > consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts> > and> > > > > > advise on> > > > > > > > the correct match.> > > > > > > > 5. Up to the above para is reprinted from the early writtings> > in> > > > the> > > > > > > > Krishnamurti Padhdhati Vol II, Sagar publications, 1966.> > > > > > > > 6. Page 69 fourth to sixth paras are added in the mentioned KP> > > > Reader> > > > > > IV,> > > > > > > > first published in May 1971; fourth para is as given under:> > > > > > > > To cause difference of opinion,disagreement, dispute, divorce> > etc.> > > > > > among> > > > > > > > the couple it is not left to Mars alone, any planet can cause> > such> > > > > > > > undesirable effect provided they happen to be deposited in such> > a> > > > > > position,> > > > > > > > that the sublord of the planet is the significator of 6 or 10> > or 12> > > > or> > > > > > the> > > > > > > > sublord is deposited in a constellation, the lord of which is> > the> > > > > > > > significator of 6 or 10 or 12.> > > > > > > > 7. In KP, marriage matching, like education, occupation,death,> > is> > > > > > supposed> > > > > > > > to be predestined.> > > > > > > > 8. The speculative ideas would be sound, if and only if> > supported> > > > by a> > > > > > > > research study of sufficient numbers of charts other than here> > say> > > > > > > > experience or opinion.> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Thanks and regards,> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > TW> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > <%40><%> > 40><%> >> > > > 40>,> > > > > > Punit Pandey <punitp@> wrote:> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Dear Tw ji,> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > I personally feel that the study missed few very basic but> > > > important> > > > > > > > points> > > > > > > > > and I would like to mention the same -> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > 1. Problems due to Mars Dosha, tradionally as well as> > narrated by> > > > > > Shri> > > > > > > > KSK (> > > > > > > > > http://logy.astrosage.com/mars-dosha), occurs only> > when> > > > the> > > > > > > > husband> > > > > > > > > and wife do not have same level of dosha. The problem exists> > only> > > > if> > > > > > a> > > > > > > > > person having Mars dosha marries to the person who doesn't> > have> > > > Mars> > > > > > > > dosha> > > > > > > > > (even if we ignore level of dosha). The study seems to> > consider> > > > > > > > > only individual's chart and not two charts together. If it is> > > > > > studying> > > > > > > > > only individual's chart, the study doesn't have much meaning.> > A> > > > study> > > > > > > > needs> > > > > > > > > to see Mars dosha in two situation and compare - a) mars> > dosha> > > > person> > > > > > > > > marriying to mars dosha person, b) mars dosha person not> > marring> > > > to> > > > > > Mars> > > > > > > > > dosha person. Till the time we compare this two situation,> > how> > > > come> > > > > > we> > > > > > > > > conclude whether Mars Dosha works or not.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > 2. Traditonally as well as according to Shri KSK, Mars dosha> > > > should> > > > > > be> > > > > > > > > checked from Ascendant, Moon and Venus. It seems that study> > is> > > > > > > > considering> > > > > > > > > only Ascedant and ignoring Moon and Venus. Again, if we do> > not> > > > follow> > > > > > the> > > > > > > > > definition properly, the conclusion reached can not be called> > > > > > correct.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Here is the conclusion from your article -> > > > > > > > > "It is to follow the KP rules only in considering longevity,> > > > > > matching,> > > > > > > > > separation, divorce, multi-marriage, happy or unhappy married> > > > life> > > > > > etc.> > > > > > > > > without mixing up with the traditional Manglik-to- Manglik> > > > matching> > > > > > rule> > > > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > explain the public not to worry about Mars Dosha as suggested> > by> > > > Shri> > > > > > K.> > > > > > > > > Hariharan."> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Here again it seems that we are mixing up two things. KP does> > NOT> > > > > > provide> > > > > > > > > any tool for chart matching and Mars dosha is a tool for> > matching> > > > and> > > > > > not> > > > > > > > > for prediction. KP clearly gives the rule for longevity etc.,> > but> > > > > > doesn't> > > > > > > > > tell much about matching two charts. There is no doubt that> > KP is> > > > > > > > dependent> > > > > > > > > on traditional methods of horoscope matching as far as KP> > readers> > > > are> > > > > > > > > concerned. This is the reason Koota as well as Mars dosha> > found> > > > place> > > > > > in> > > > > > > > KP.> > > > > > > > > In my opinion, the study is about Mars dosha as a predictive> > tool> > > > > > (which> > > > > > > > is> > > > > > > > > not discussed by Shri KSK) and NOT Mars dosha as a matching> > tool> > > > > > (which> > > > > > > > is> > > > > > > > > discussed by Shri KSK).> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards,> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:51 PM, TW tw853@ wrote:> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Dear Friends,> > > > > > > > > > What has been found is in the File section under:> > > > > > > > > > MARS DOSHA IN KP.doc> > > > > > > > > > Regards,> > > > > > > > > > TW> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > <%40>> > <%40><%> > > > 40><%> > > >> > > > > > 40>,> > > > > > > > Punit> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Pandey punitp@ wrote:> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Dear Friends,> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Here is what is found in third reader -> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > http://logy.astrosage.com/mars-dosha> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards,> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Ramani> > kadavasalramani@wrote:> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Shri Bansalj,> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Any kind of Mars Dosha including the Mars in 4th fron> > Lagna> > > > or> > > > > > Moon> > > > > > > > or> > > > > > > > > > > > Venus gets cancelled when Mars is aspected by Saturn.> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Truly yours,> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > K.S.V.Ramani> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > ** <%40>> > <%40>> > > > <%40><%> > > > > > 40> > > > > > > > >[> > > > > > > > > > <%40><%> > 40><%> > > > 40><%> > > >> > > > > > 40>] *On> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Behalf Of *pankaj bansal> > > > > > > > > > > > *Sent:* 04 December 2009 22:50> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > *To:* <%40>> > <%40>> > > > <%40><%> > > >> > > > > > 40>> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > *Subject:* Re: MARS DOSHA...my experience> > over> > > > the> > > > > > > > > > years...> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste Lajmiji,> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > If Mars is placed In 4th house from> > > > > > > > > > > > Lagna & Venus and Placed in POORVASHADA> > Nakshatra(Venus).Then> > > > > > there> > > > > > > > is No> > > > > > > > > > So> > > > > > > > > > > > called Mars dosha and the Native Can Marriage anybody> > who> > > > had> > > > > > or> > > > > > > > had> > > > > > > > > > not> > > > > > > > > > > > mars dosha in this Birth Chart?Eagerly waiting for your> > > > > > precious> > > > > > > > > > response.> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > ** Yogesh Lajmi yogeshlajmi@> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > *To:* <%40>> > <%40>> > > > <%40><%> > > >> > > > > > 40>> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > *Cc:* Punit Pandey punitp@> > > > > > > > > > > > *Sent:* Fri, 4 December, 2009 8:05:18 PM> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > *Subject:* MARS DOSHA...my experience over> > the> > > > > > > > years...> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Members,> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Not withstanding what has been averred by some "K.P.> > > > > > > > > > > > research scholars",> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > and whose research has been qestioned already in these> > > > columns> > > > > > by> > > > > > > > many> > > > > > > > > > KP> > > > > > > > > > > > followers,> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > *and also,*my own experience about Mars Dosha,over the> > > > > > years,and> > > > > > > > after> > > > > > > > > > > > analysing the charts of many a married couples,for> > marital> > > > > > > > > > > > problems,especially ,after marriage,I agree 100% with> > the> > > > > > > > observation> > > > > > > > > > in> > > > > > > > > > > > K.P. books that *Mars posited in Sun's star,or own> > star,and> > > > > > > > occuping> > > > > > > > > > > > houses I,II,IV,VII, VIII & XII** **alone causes Mars> > > > > > Dosha**...*> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > I invite the opinion of all members...on this very> > > > > > > > > > > > controversial matter,and I must add here that almost> > ALL of> > > > my> > > > > > > > clients> > > > > > > > > > who> > > > > > > > > > > > come to consult me,strongly believe about the existence> > of> > > > Mars> > > > > > > > > > Dosha...so> > > > > > > > > > > > much so that they attribute almost every domestic> > problem> > > > to> > > > > > the> > > > > > > > > > existence> > > > > > > > > > > > of Mars Dosha,and keep asking for *"remedies".. .* !> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Which I patiently have to explain in detail...based> > > > > > > > > > > > on their own experience in the practise of the K.P.> > > > System...> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > This is just to illustrate how deeply the ill-effects> > > > > > > > > > > > of Mars are embedded in the minds of people,at large...> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Am looking forward to comments from discerning> > > > > > > > > > > > members...> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > With kind regards,> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Yogesh Lajmi.> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > * *> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Win 1 of 4 Sony home entertainment packs thanks to> > 7.> > > > > > Enter> > > > > > > > now<> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > http://us.lrd./_ylc=X3oDMTJxN2x2ZmNpBF9zAzIwMjM2MTY2MTMEdG1fZG1lY2gDVGV4dCBMaW5rBHRtX2xuawNVMTEwMzk3NwR0bV9uZXQDWWFob28hBHRtX3BvcwN0YWdsaW5lBHRtX3BwdHkDYXVueg--/SIG=14600t3ni/**http%3A/au.rd./mail/tagline/sony/*http%3A/au.docs./homepageset/%3Fp1=other%26p2=au%26p3=mailtagline> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > .> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your> > > > > > > > > > Homepage<> > > > > > > > > > http://in.rd./tagline_yyi_1/*http:/in./>> > > > > > > > > > > > .> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Dear Tw ji,

 

Appreciate your response.

 

I understand that you agree to the fact that following paragraph was conclusion of the article on Mars Dosha in 1966 edition -

" It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise on the correct match. "

 

Your opinion that it doesn't appear in line with KP thinking and hence another paragraph is appended to the article in later editions. I also agree to that and expressed similar thoughts in my earlier message (/message/29778).

 

As the part of article was added later on, it seems that it introduced some mismatch. Earlier article talked primarily about Mars dosha in horoscope matching, but later paragraphs seems to apply on individual's horoscope. This mismatch created confusion in people's mind and I feel that we have better clarity now after this discussion.

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 8:56 PM, TW <tw853 wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Punit ji,

1. I'm sorry for deferring to answer your question in my conclusion.2. No, no seams no practical application of Mars dosha in KP. Thank you for answers, no more question in this regard. 3.  The following conclusion of fourth para, page 69 of KP Reader IV (any reprint edition) or third para, page 228 of Krishnamurti Padhdhati Vol II, Sagar publications, 1966, can not be for the KP followers to apply the Traditinal matching which has been explained before that conclusion. There is no way to apply Traditional way of matching in KP. It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise on the correct match.   

4. That is why to make it clear the following three paras are added in the KP Reader IV. " To cause difference of opinion,disagreemen t, dispute, divorce etc. among the couple it is not left to Mars alone, any planet can cause such undesirable effect provided they happen to be deposited in such a position, that the sublord of the planet is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 or the sublord is deposited in a constellation, the lord of which is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12. "

" If the same planet is also the significator of 2 or 7 or 11, then it will be only for a short period and again they unite and continue to live together. "   " If the sub lord is either Mars or if it is in the constellation of Mars , and if is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 , there will be separation. If it is saturn , silence and remain dumb-stick and strike. Thus we have to predict. "

5. It appears like indirect explanation with compared to direct change to 'Lagna alone' in KP Reader III, first published in Oct 1979, from 'Lagna or Moon whichever is stronger' (like in atyacharya's Satya Jataka, Adhyaya 1, slokas 7 to 14) earlier applied in Krishnamurti Padhdhati Vol II, Sagar publications, 1966. (point 1 of message below)

/message/18330?threaded=1

Thanks and regards,TW

 

, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:>> Dear Tw ji,>

> The discussion is not fair from your side. You asked a question and I> responded by saying 'No'. I also asked quite a few questions and I didn't> get response and what I get is another question in reply. I am reproducing

> one such question my my last email -> > > By the way, will you agree, though, that this is the conclusion by Shri> KSK> > on the Mars dosha article (in 1966 edition)? -> > " It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh and

> > consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise> on> > the correct match. " > > You should answer first and then only ask further question.>

> Thanks & Regards,> > Punit Pandey> >

> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 5:02 PM, TW tw853 wrote:> > >> >> > Dear Punit ji,> >> > Is there any astrologer publishing an article with example charts on

> > working of Mars dosha in the KP literature like A & A, K.P. & Astrology?> >> >> > Thanks and regards,> > TW> >

 

 

> > <%40>, Punit

> > Pandey punitp@ wrote:> > >> > > Dear Tw ji,> > >> > > No, as I mentioned earlier, KP readers have only traditional methods for> > > " Horoscope Matching " . KP might not have used Mars dosha, but saying that

> > it> > > doesn't work require further study. And this is simply the point that we> > can> > > not discard that we have not verified yet.> > >> > > By the way, will you agree, though, that this is the conclusion by Shri

> > KSK> > > on the Mars dosha article (in 1966 edition)? -> > > " It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh and> > > consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise

> > on> > > the correct match. " > > >> > > Thanks & Regards,> > >> > > Punit Pandey> > >> > >> > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 1:50 AM, TW tw853@ wrote:

> > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Punit ji,> > > > Have you come across any practical article on working of Mars dosha in> > the> > > > whole KP literature?

> > > >> > > > Thanks and regards,> > > > TW> > > >> > > > <%40><%

 

> > 40>, Punit> > > > Pandey <punitp@> wrote:> > > > >> > > > > Dear Tw ji,

> > > > >> > > > > In my earlier emails, I was neither claiming nor promising any study.> > I> > > > was> > > > > just communicating that the exiting study doesn't cover " Mars dosha

> > for> > > > > marriage matching " - the primary application of Mard dosha. My> > objective> > > > was> > > > > to clarify the scope of the existing study and I am happy that I have

> > > > shared> > > > > my understanding with the forum.> > > > >> > > > > Thanks & Regards,> > > > >> > > > > Punit Pandey

> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 10:16 PM, TW <tw853@> wrote:> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear Punit ji,> > > > > >> > > > > > Any practical study on your understanding would be helpful to the> > forum> > > > for

> > > > > > seeing to be believing.> > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks and regards,> > > > > > TW> > > > > >> > > > > > <%40><%

> > 40><%> >> > > > 40>, Punit

> > > > > > Pandey <punitp@> wrote:> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Dear Tw ji,> > > > > > >> > > > > > > 1. Please tell clearly whether you are saying that 1966 is more

> > > > > > authentic or> > > > > > > 1971. I do not understand the reason for initial 6 points.> > > > > > > 2. Even in 1971 edition, when we say that " .... it can not be

> > left to> > > > > > Mars> > > > > > > alone " , it clearly means that Mars has impact, but it is not the> > > > " only " > > > > > > > reason. Shri KSK were very clear about the impact of Mars dosha

> > and> > > > that> > > > > > is> > > > > > > the rason instead of rejecting it (which he has done quite often> > in> > > > > > readers

> > > > > > > for some other theories like Ashtakvarga), he said that this is> > not> > > > the> > > > > > > reason " alone. " > > > > > > > 3. Regarding point 7, the question is not whether everything is

> > > > > > pre-destined> > > > > > > or not. The question is whether it is correct to check Mars dosha> > on> > > > > > > indiviaul's chart where Shri KSK clearly mentioned it for

> > > > compatibility> > > > > > > matching. Any conclusion drawn without considered both the> > partner's> > > > > > > horoscope seems incomplete to me and against what Shri KSK has

> > > > mentioned> > > > > > > about it.> > > > > > > 4. You also didn't answer my question, whether Moon and Venus> > were> > > > > > > considered or not, apart from Ascendant, in the study? We must

> > > > remember> > > > > > that> > > > > > > Shri KSK clearly mentioned about inclusion of Moon and Venus with> > > > > > Ascendant> > > > > > > while judging Mars dosha.

> > > > > > > 5. What ideas you are finding speculative? I am just quoting what> > > > Shri> > > > > > KSK> > > > > > > has said and what proof you need more than what Shri KSK has said

> > > > > > himself.> > > > > > >> > > > > > > My objections and questions doesn't mean that I am try to> > belittle> > > > the

> > > > > > > study. The study is useful and establish that Mars dosha has> > limited> > > > or> > > > > > no> > > > > > > value when it comes to predicting disagreement, dispute, and

> > divorce> > > > etc.> > > > > > in> > > > > > > marriage. It is a good and useful finding. Though the study> > doesn't> > > > tell

> > > > > > > anything about Mars dosha compatibility and we should be very> > clear> > > > about> > > > > > > it. Most of the problems are said when Mars dosha doesn't match

> > in> > > > bride> > > > > > and> > > > > > > groom's chart and this is the utility of this theory in Hindu> > > > astrology> > > > > > (and

> > > > > > > Indian families). Also, in future study must be extended to> > include> > > > Moon> > > > > > and> > > > > > > Venus, so that it can test the real definition of Mars dosha and

> > not> > > > just> > > > > > an> > > > > > > incomplete definition of Mars dosha. Till the time the scope of> > study> > > > is

> > > > > > > clear, people may confuse and think that Mars dosha is match> > making> > > > > > doesn't> > > > > > > exist which is actually not convered in the study.

> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Thanks & Regards,> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Punit Pandey> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 8:55 PM, TW <tw853@> wrote:> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Dear Friends,> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > 1. Mars dosha has been written in the KP Reader IV (Marriage,> > > > Married

> > > > > > Life> > > > > > > > & Children) pages 51-69 (any Edition of reprinting).> > > > > > > > 2. Page 52, second and third paras> > > > > > > > One may ask, " Why should they attach so much importance to the

> > > > position> > > > > > of> > > > > > > > Mars alone? .......> > > > > > > > The reply is that there are some people who unnessarily

> > exaggerate> > > > the> > > > > > evil> > > > > > > > results of Mars.....> > > > > > > > 3. Page 55, third para> > > > > > > > Let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally

> > offer> > > > my> > > > > > > > opinion.> > > > > > > > 4. Page 69 fourth para> > > > > > > > It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully

> > weigh> > > > and> > > > > > > > consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts> > and> > > > > > advise on> > > > > > > > the correct match.

> > > > > > > > 5. Up to the above para is reprinted from the early writtings> > in> > > > the> > > > > > > > Krishnamurti Padhdhati Vol II, Sagar publications, 1966.

> > > > > > > > 6. Page 69 fourth to sixth paras are added in the mentioned KP> > > > Reader> > > > > > IV,> > > > > > > > first published in May 1971; fourth para is as given under:

> > > > > > > > To cause difference of opinion,disagreement, dispute, divorce> > etc.> > > > > > among> > > > > > > > the couple it is not left to Mars alone, any planet can cause

> > such> > > > > > > > undesirable effect provided they happen to be deposited in such> > a> > > > > > position,> > > > > > > > that the sublord of the planet is the significator of 6 or 10

> > or 12> > > > or> > > > > > the> > > > > > > > sublord is deposited in a constellation, the lord of which is> > the> > > > > > > > significator of 6 or 10 or 12.

> > > > > > > > 7. In KP, marriage matching, like education, occupation,death,> > is> > > > > > supposed> > > > > > > > to be predestined.

> > > > > > > > 8. The speculative ideas would be sound, if and only if> > supported> > > > by a> > > > > > > > research study of sufficient numbers of charts other than here

> > say> > > > > > > > experience or opinion.> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Thanks and regards,> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > TW> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > <%40><%

> > 40><%> >> > > > 40>,

> > > > > > Punit Pandey <punitp@> wrote:> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Dear Tw ji,> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > I personally feel that the study missed few very basic but> > > > important> > > > > > > > points> > > > > > > > > and I would like to mention the same -

> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > 1. Problems due to Mars Dosha, tradionally as well as> > narrated by> > > > > > Shri> > > > > > > > KSK (

> > > > > > > > > http://logy.astrosage.com/mars-dosha), occurs only> > when> > > > the

> > > > > > > > husband> > > > > > > > > and wife do not have same level of dosha. The problem exists> > only> > > > if> > > > > > a

> > > > > > > > > person having Mars dosha marries to the person who doesn't> > have> > > > Mars> > > > > > > > dosha> > > > > > > > > (even if we ignore level of dosha). The study seems to

> > consider> > > > > > > > > only individual's chart and not two charts together. If it is> > > > > > studying> > > > > > > > > only individual's chart, the study doesn't have much meaning.

> > A> > > > study> > > > > > > > needs> > > > > > > > > to see Mars dosha in two situation and compare - a) mars> > dosha> > > > person

> > > > > > > > > marriying to mars dosha person, b) mars dosha person not> > marring> > > > to> > > > > > Mars> > > > > > > > > dosha person. Till the time we compare this two situation,

> > how> > > > come> > > > > > we> > > > > > > > > conclude whether Mars Dosha works or not.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > 2. Traditonally as well as according to Shri KSK, Mars dosha

> > > > should> > > > > > be> > > > > > > > > checked from Ascendant, Moon and Venus. It seems that study> > is> > > > > > > > considering

> > > > > > > > > only Ascedant and ignoring Moon and Venus. Again, if we do> > not> > > > follow> > > > > > the> > > > > > > > > definition properly, the conclusion reached can not be called

> > > > > > correct.> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Here is the conclusion from your article -> > > > > > > > > " It is to follow the KP rules only in considering longevity,

> > > > > > matching,> > > > > > > > > separation, divorce, multi-marriage, happy or unhappy married> > > > life> > > > > > etc.> > > > > > > > > without mixing up with the traditional Manglik-to- Manglik

> > > > matching> > > > > > rule> > > > > > > > and> > > > > > > > > explain the public not to worry about Mars Dosha as suggested

> > by> > > > Shri> > > > > > K.> > > > > > > > > Hariharan. " > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Here again it seems that we are mixing up two things. KP does

> > NOT> > > > > > provide> > > > > > > > > any tool for chart matching and Mars dosha is a tool for> > matching> > > > and> > > > > > not

> > > > > > > > > for prediction. KP clearly gives the rule for longevity etc.,> > but> > > > > > doesn't> > > > > > > > > tell much about matching two charts. There is no doubt that

> > KP is> > > > > > > > dependent> > > > > > > > > on traditional methods of horoscope matching as far as KP> > readers> > > > are

> > > > > > > > > concerned. This is the reason Koota as well as Mars dosha> > found> > > > place> > > > > > in> > > > > > > > KP.

> > > > > > > > > In my opinion, the study is about Mars dosha as a predictive> > tool> > > > > > (which> > > > > > > > is> > > > > > > > > not discussed by Shri KSK) and NOT Mars dosha as a matching

> > tool> > > > > > (which> > > > > > > > is> > > > > > > > > discussed by Shri KSK).> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards,> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:51 PM, TW tw853@ wrote:> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Dear Friends,> > > > > > > > > > What has been found is in the File section under:

> > > > > > > > > > MARS DOSHA IN KP.doc> > > > > > > > > > Regards,> > > > > > > > > > TW> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > <%40>

> > <%40><%> > > > 40><%

> > > >> > > > > > 40>,> > > > > > > > Punit> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Pandey punitp@ wrote:> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Dear Friends,> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Here is what is found in third reader -> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > http://logy.astrosage.com/mars-dosha

> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards,> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Punit Pandey

> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Ramani> > kadavasalramani@wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Shri Bansalj,

> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Any kind of Mars Dosha including the Mars in 4th fron

> > Lagna> > > > or> > > > > > Moon> > > > > > > > or> > > > > > > > > > > > Venus gets cancelled when Mars is aspected by Saturn.

> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Truly yours,

> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > K.S.V.Ramani

> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > ** <%40>

> > <%40>> > > > <%40><%

> > > > > > 40> > > > > > > > >[> > > > > > > > > > <%40><%

> > 40><%> > > > 40><%

> > > >> > > > > > 40>] *On> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Behalf Of *pankaj bansal

> > > > > > > > > > > > *Sent:* 04 December 2009 22:50> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > *To:* <%40>

> > <%40>> > > > <%40><%

> > > >> > > > > > 40>> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > *Subject:* Re: MARS DOSHA...my experience

> > over> > > > the> > > > > > > > > > years...> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste Lajmiji,

> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > If Mars is placed In 4th house from> > > > > > > > > > > > Lagna & Venus and Placed in POORVASHADA

> > Nakshatra(Venus).Then> > > > > > there> > > > > > > > is No> > > > > > > > > > So> > > > > > > > > > > > called Mars dosha and the Native Can Marriage anybody

> > who> > > > had> > > > > > or> > > > > > > > had> > > > > > > > > > not> > > > > > > > > > > > mars dosha in this Birth Chart?Eagerly waiting for your

> > > > > > precious> > > > > > > > > > response.> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks

> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > ** Yogesh Lajmi yogeshlajmi@> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > *To:* <%40>

> > <%40>> > > > <%40><%

> > > >> > > > > > 40>> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > *Cc:* Punit Pandey punitp@

> > > > > > > > > > > > *Sent:* Fri, 4 December, 2009 8:05:18 PM> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > *Subject:* MARS DOSHA...my experience over

> > the> > > > > > > > years...> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Members,> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Not withstanding what has been averred by some " K.P.

> > > > > > > > > > > > research scholars " ,> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > and whose research has been qestioned already in these

> > > > columns> > > > > > by> > > > > > > > many> > > > > > > > > > KP> > > > > > > > > > > > followers,

> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > *and also,*my own experience about Mars Dosha,over the> > > > > > years,and

> > > > > > > > after> > > > > > > > > > > > analysing the charts of many a married couples,for> > marital> > > > > > > > > > > > problems,especially ,after marriage,I agree 100% with

> > the> > > > > > > > observation> > > > > > > > > > in> > > > > > > > > > > > K.P. books that *Mars posited in Sun's star,or own

> > star,and> > > > > > > > occuping> > > > > > > > > > > > houses I,II,IV,VII, VIII & XII** **alone causes Mars> > > > > > Dosha**...*

> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > I invite the opinion of all members...on this very> > > > > > > > > > > > controversial matter,and I must add here that almost

> > ALL of> > > > my> > > > > > > > clients> > > > > > > > > > who> > > > > > > > > > > > come to consult me,strongly believe about the existence

> > of> > > > Mars> > > > > > > > > > Dosha...so> > > > > > > > > > > > much so that they attribute almost every domestic

> > problem> > > > to> > > > > > the> > > > > > > > > > existence> > > > > > > > > > > > of Mars Dosha,and keep asking for * " remedies " .. .* !

> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Which I patiently have to explain in detail...based> > > > > > > > > > > > on their own experience in the practise of the K.P.

> > > > System...> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > This is just to illustrate how deeply the ill-effects> > > > > > > > > > > > of Mars are embedded in the minds of people,at large...

> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Am looking forward to comments from discerning> > > > > > > > > > > > members...

> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > With kind regards,> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Yogesh Lajmi.

> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > * *> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Win 1 of 4 Sony home entertainment packs thanks to

> > 7.> > > > > > Enter> > > > > > > > now<> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >

> > > >> > http://us.lrd./_ylc=X3oDMTJxN2x2ZmNpBF9zAzIwMjM2MTY2MTMEdG1fZG1lY2gDVGV4dCBMaW5rBHRtX2xuawNVMTEwMzk3NwR0bV9uZXQDWWFob28hBHRtX3BvcwN0YWdsaW5lBHRtX3BwdHkDYXVueg--/SIG=14600t3ni/**http%3A/au.rd./mail/tagline/sony/*http%3A/au.docs./homepageset/%3Fp1=other%26p2=au%26p3=mailtagline

> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > .> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your

> > > > > > > > > > Homepage<> > > > > > > > > > http://in.rd./tagline_yyi_1/*http:/in./>

> > > > > > > > > > > > .> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >

> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Punitji Pranam,I still didnt understand what is the difference between mars dosha for compatibility and mars causing seperation.1.) Our Guruji gave preference to stars but not to the mere placement in a sign ,(like in vedic astrology). Even in star placements he went further and divided into sub divisions. He proved that the minute subdivisions are responsible in drastic changes in the lifes of the people born in the same place or twins.In this context how it will be logical to belive that KSK suggested us to verify mars dosha (which deals only with placement in a sign). 2) KSK in many instances told that every one has to face the good or bad events in his life based upon the meritorious deeds done in his previous birth and no chart has influence on others life. then how will be to think that mars placement in

wifes chart will cause problems even though husbands chart indicating hormonious wedded life !3) why guruji suggested us to judge separately about longevity etc... If mars dosha can cause widowhood to either.4) p.no. 52. Guruji stated as follows :One may ask, '"why should they attach too much importance to the position of mars alone ? we had never heard anybody taking of moon`s dosha or any other planet`s dosha or sun`s dosha or any other planets dosha . then does it mean that mars alone will do so much harm to the couple to the couple which other planets cannot do"?the reply is that there are some people who unnecessarily exaggerate the evil results of mars. Most of the following points are not taken into consideration he stated 20 points

against kuja dosha:then how can we say that ksk advocated Kuja dosha analysis for match making.the reason for the para by Guruji as shown by you is that (as i feel)in the starting of the concept p.no. 55 :"when parents attempt to fix the marriage of their sons and the daughters, the so called mars dosha , interpreted by astrologers according to their whims and fancies , confuses them due to varying opinion given by them." after few lines :"let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion ":thats why he divided mars-dosha into three groups and said the anology of blood group (because ksk

tries to say that we has to match the chart having kuja dosha with a chart having similar dosha but not the other two variants,) therefore it is clear that KSK categorise Mars-dosha and stated his opinion only for those astrologers but not to his followers :"It is therefore , necessary that

astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of

mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the correct match"As per the mails of tinwinji i understood that the topic ended here, and later the last few paras were inserted So as to let the readers know how K.P. followers look at these "doshas" by taking only the sub-level significations and not the mere placement of mars in different signs.hope i am clear.i am not critising any one this iis what i understood about this concept.Guruji bless us all.Peace and Prosperity to All !!VGR--- On Mon, 7/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:Punit Pandey <punitpRe: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years... Date: Monday, 7 December, 2009, 12:50 AM

 

 

Dear Pavan ji,

 

It seem you are also mixing up two things. The Mars dosha section talks about two points -

1. Mars dosha for marriage matching

2. Mars dosha for predicting "difference of opinion, disagreement, dispute"

 

The section that has been appended later on in 1971 edition (starting from - To cause different of opinion ....) is for using Mars dosha for predicting difference of opinion, disagreement, disputes etc. Shri KSK himself clearly mentioned that any planet can do that. The study also proved the same point which Shri KSK has said. If you read my earlier email, I appreciated study for proving this point.

 

Though my point is that study didn't touch Mars dosha in marriage matching. Shri KSK said -

"It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise on the correct match."

 

It is clearly Shri KSK's opinion for using Mars dosha in "marriage matching" and not predicting on individual's horoscope. Point 1 (Mars dosha in marriage matching) was suggested by Shri KSK but not touched by study. My reason for writing the email was that people should not confuse that the study rejected both - mars dosha in prediction and mars dosha in marriage matching. The truth is that the study touched only mars dosha in prediction on individual's chart.

 

Generally Shri KSK was very truthful and blunt in calling a spade a spade. If he found that something is not working, he bluntly said that. Though when he says something to "weigh and consider various points of Mars Dosha", we should listen him till the time some study proves otherwise. We will have to wait for a study that checks bride and groom's chart simultaneously and conclude something. I hope now you got my point.

 

I do not have 1966 edition with me. Tw ji said that upto "It is, therefore, ..." is reprint of earlier edition of 1966. Which means "It is, therefore, ..." was the actual conclusion by Shri KSK and I do not think that there should be any doubt on it. He starts with that I'll tell you my opinion and finally he offers this opinion to "weigh and consider various points of Mars Dosha".

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 11:27 PM, vgr pavan <vgr_pavan1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Punitji pranam,Pardon for interfering ....the qoute in reader 4 is

"To cause difference of opinion, disagreement, dispute, divorce etc. among the couple it is not left

to Mars alone, any planet can cause such undesirable effect provided

they happen to be deposited in such a position, that the sublord ofthe planet is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 or the sublord is

deposited in a constellation, the lord of which is the significatorof 6 or 10 or 12".Guruji , also stressed that "any planet can cause "such" undesirable effect , So he is telling

that we need not give preference to "Mars" alone , any planet can cause such results. Again in the next para" If the sub lord is mars or if it is in the constellation of mars , and if is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 , there will be separation. If it is saturn , silence and remain dumb-stick and strike. thus we have to predict."

here also he said "separation" will be caused by mars only when he is sublord or sub tenanted star lord and significator for 6,10,12. but not with mere placement of mars in various signs from asc, moon, venus.

[in P.no. 194 under the head "Divorce""there is no mars dosha in this chart because it is in a movable sign , it is debilitated ; conjoined with mercury . Yet look at the fate . thus taking the position of mars and offering predictions which appear more like a curse is not correct . but take the planets situated in the star or sub of mars in 1,2,4,8,12 ,. then , that planet tenanted in such a mars star will offer undesirable and disagreeable results.]

point no. 3 "Shri KSK clearly mentioned it for compatibility matching"i think you are pointing the para above the para given by me, it reads as follows:

"It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the correct match":

in the starting of this explanation on mars dosha P.no.55 KSK mentioned that : "Let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion. "

So i think that upto the above para (p.no. 69 ) is what Gurujis explanation about various rules and the later paragraphs are his "final" opinion.(which are last paras of the topic) .

point no.4 guruji explained what vedic astrological rules for "Mars Dosha " are . but not instructed us to follow the same. These are my opinions .......

Peace and Prosperity to All !!VGR --- On Sun, 6/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years... @gro ups.comSunday, 6 December, 2009, 9:40 PM

 

 

Dear Tw ji,

 

1. Please tell clearly whether you are saying that 1966 is more authentic or 1971. I do not understand the reason for initial 6 points.

2. Even in 1971 edition, when we say that ".... it can not be left to Mars alone", it clearly means that Mars has impact, but it is not the "only" reason. Shri KSK were very clear about the impact of Mars dosha and that is the rason instead of rejecting it (which he has done quite often in readers for some other theories like Ashtakvarga) , he said that this is not the reason "alone."

3. Regarding point 7, the question is not whether everything is pre-destined or not. The question is whether it is correct to check Mars dosha on indiviaul's chart where Shri KSK clearly mentioned it for compatibility matching. Any conclusion drawn without considered both the partner's horoscope seems incomplete to me and against what Shri KSK has mentioned about it.

4. You also didn't answer my question, whether Moon and Venus were considered or not, apart from Ascendant, in the study? We must remember that Shri KSK clearly mentioned about inclusion of Moon and Venus with Ascendant while judging Mars dosha.

5. What ideas you are finding speculative? I am just quoting what Shri KSK has said and what proof you need more than what Shri KSK has said himself.

 

My objections and questions doesn't mean that I am try to belittle the study. The study is useful and establish that Mars dosha has limited or no value when it comes to predicting disagreement, dispute, and divorce etc. in marriage. It is a good and useful finding. Though the study doesn't tell anything about Mars dosha compatibility and we should be very clear about it. Most of the problems are said when Mars dosha doesn't match in bride and groom's chart and this is the utility of this theory in Hindu astrology (and Indian families). Also, in future study must be extended to include Moon and Venus, so that it can test the real definition of Mars dosha and not just an incomplete definition of Mars dosha. Till the time the scope of study is clear, people may confuse and think that Mars dosha is match making doesn't exist which is actually not convered in the study.

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 8:55 PM, TW <tw853 > wrote:

 

 

 

 

Dear Friends,

 

1. Mars dosha has been written in the KP Reader IV (Marriage, Married Life & Children) pages 51-69 (any Edition of reprinting). 2. Page 52, second and third parasOne may ask, "Why should they attach so much importance to the position of Mars alone? .......

The reply is that there are some people who unnessarily exaggerate the evil results of Mars.....3. Page 55, third paraLet me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion.

4. Page 69 fourth para It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise on the correct match.

5. Up to the above para is reprinted from the early writtings in the Krishnamurti Padhdhati Vol II, Sagar publications, 1966.6. Page 69 fourth to sixth paras are added in the mentioned KP Reader IV, first published in May 1971; fourth para is as given under:

To cause difference of opinion,disagreemen t, dispute, divorce etc. among the couple it is not left to Mars alone, any planet can cause such undesirable effect provided they happen to be deposited in such a position, that the sublord of the planet is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 or the sublord is deposited in a constellation, the lord of which is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12.

 

7. In KP, marriage matching, like education, occupation,death, is supposed to be predestined. 8. The speculative ideas would be sound, if and only if supported by a research study of sufficient numbers of charts other than here say experience or opinion.

 

Thanks and regards,

TW

 

@gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:>

 

 

 

 

 

> Dear Tw ji,> > I personally feel that the study missed few very basic but important points> and I would like to mention the same -> > 1. Problems due to Mars Dosha, tradionally as well as narrated by Shri KSK (

> http://logy. astrosage. com/mars- dosha), occurs only when the husband> and wife do not have same level of dosha. The problem exists only if a

> person having Mars dosha marries to the person who doesn't have Mars dosha> (even if we ignore level of dosha). The study seems to consider> only individual's chart and not two charts together. If it is studying

> only individual's chart, the study doesn't have much meaning. A study needs> to see Mars dosha in two situation and compare - a) mars dosha person> marriying to mars dosha person, b) mars dosha person not marring to Mars

> dosha person. Till the time we compare this two situation, how come we> conclude whether Mars Dosha works or not.> > 2. Traditonally as well as according to Shri KSK, Mars dosha should be> checked from Ascendant, Moon and Venus. It seems that study is considering

> only Ascedant and ignoring Moon and Venus. Again, if we do not follow the> definition properly, the conclusion reached can not be called correct.> > Here is the conclusion from your article -

> "It is to follow the KP rules only in considering longevity, matching,> separation, divorce, multi-marriage, happy or unhappy married life etc.> without mixing up with the traditional Manglik-to- Manglik matching rule and

> explain the public not to worry about Mars Dosha as suggested by Shri K.> Hariharan."> > Here again it seems that we are mixing up two things. KP does NOT provide> any tool for chart matching and Mars dosha is a tool for matching and not

> for prediction. KP clearly gives the rule for longevity etc., but doesn't> tell much about matching two charts. There is no doubt that KP is dependent> on traditional methods of horoscope matching as far as KP readers are

> concerned. This is the reason Koota as well as Mars dosha found place in KP.> In my opinion, the study is about Mars dosha as a predictive tool (which is> not discussed by Shri KSK) and NOT Mars dosha as a matching tool (which is

> discussed by Shri KSK).> > Thanks & Regards,> > Punit Pandey> >

> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:51 PM, TW tw853 wrote:> > >> >> > Dear Friends,> > What has been found is in the File section under:> > MARS DOSHA IN KP.doc

> > Regards,> > TW> >> >> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>, Punit

> > Pandey punitp@ wrote:> > >> > > Dear Friends,> > >> > > Here is what is found in third reader -> > >> > > http://logy. astrosage. com/mars- dosha

> > >> > > Thanks & Regards,> > >> > > Punit Pandey> > >> > >> > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Ramani kadavasalramani@ wrote:

> > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Shri Bansalj,> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Any kind of Mars Dosha including the Mars in 4th fron Lagna or Moon or

> > > > Venus gets cancelled when Mars is aspected by Saturn.> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Truly yours,> > > >> > > >

> > > >> > > > K.S.V.Ramani> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > ** @gro ups.com <%40. com>[

> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>] *On

> > > > Behalf Of *pankaj bansal> > > > *Sent:* 04 December 2009 22:50> > > >> > > > *To:* @gro ups.com <%40. com>

> > > > *Subject:* Re: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the> > years...> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >

> > > > Namaste Lajmiji,> > > >> > > > If Mars is placed In 4th house from> > > > Lagna & Venus and Placed in POORVASHADA Nakshatra(Venus) .Then there is No

> > So> > > > called Mars dosha and the Native Can Marriage anybody who had or had> > not> > > > mars dosha in this Birth Chart?Eagerly waiting for your precious> > response.

> > > >> > > > Thanks> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > ** Yogesh Lajmi yogeshlajmi@

> > > >> > > > *To:* @gro ups.com <%40. com>

 

 

 

 

> > > > *Cc:* Punit Pandey punitp@> > > > *Sent:* Fri, 4 December, 2009 8:05:18 PM> >> > > > *Subject:* MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Members,> > > >> > > > Not withstanding what has been averred by some "K.P.> > > > research scholars",

> > > >> > > > and whose research has been qestioned already in these columns by many> > KP> > > > followers,> > > >> > > > *and also,*my own experience about Mars Dosha,over the years,and after

> > > > analysing the charts of many a married couples,for marital> > > > problems,especially ,after marriage,I agree 100% with the observation> > in> > > > K.P. books that *Mars posited in Sun's star,or own star,and occuping

> > > > houses I,II,IV,VII, VIII & XII** **alone causes Mars Dosha**...*> > > >> > > > I invite the opinion of all members...on this very> > > > controversial matter,and I must add here that almost ALL of my clients

> > who> > > > come to consult me,strongly believe about the existence of Mars> > Dosha...so> > > > much so that they attribute almost every domestic problem to the> > existence

> > > > of Mars Dosha,and keep asking for *"remedies".. .* !> > > >> > > > Which I patiently have to explain in detail...based> > > > on their own experience in the practise of the K.P. System...

> > > >> > > > This is just to illustrate how deeply the ill-effects> > > > of Mars are embedded in the minds of people,at large...> > > >> > > > Am looking forward to comments from discerning

> > > > members...> > > >> > > > With kind regards,> > > >> > > > Yogesh Lajmi.> > > >> > > > * *> > > >

> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > Win 1 of 4 Sony home entertainment packs thanks to 7. Enter now<> > http://us.lrd. / _ylc=X3oDMTJxN2x 2ZmNpBF9zAzIwMjM 2MTY2MTMEdG1fZG1 lY2gDVGV4dCBMaW5 rBHRtX2xuawNVMTE wMzk3NwR0bV9uZXQ DWWFob28hBHRtX3B vcwN0YWdsaW5lBHR tX3BwdHkDYXVueg- -/SIG=14600t3ni/ **http%3A/ au.rd.. com/mail/ tagline/sony/ *http%3A/ au.docs.. com/homepageset/ %3Fp1=other% 26p2=au%26p3= mailtagline > > >> > > > .> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage<

> > http://in.rd. / tagline_yyi_ 1/*http:/ in.. com/>> > > > .> > > >

> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >>

 

 

 

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

 

 

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Punitji Pranam,I still didnt understand what is the difference between mars dosha for compatibility and mars causing seperation.1.) Our Guruji gave preference to stars but not to the mere placement in a sign ,(like in vedic astrology). Even in star placements he went further and divided into sub divisions. He proved that the minute subdivisions are responsible in drastic changes in the lifes of the people born in the same place or twins.In this context how it will be logical to belive that KSK suggested us to verify mars dosha (which deals only with placement in a sign). 2) KSK in many instances told that every one has to face the good or bad events in his life based upon the meritorious deeds done in his previous birth and no chart has influence on others life. then how will be to think that mars placement in

wifes chart will cause problems even though husbands chart indicating hormonious wedded life !3) why guruji suggested us to judge separately about longevity etc... If mars dosha can cause widowhood to either.4) p.no. 52. Guruji stated as follows :One may ask, '"why should they attach too much importance to the position of mars alone ? we had never heard anybody taking of moon`s dosha or any other planet`s dosha or sun`s dosha or any other planets dosha . then does it mean that mars alone will do so much harm to the couple to the couple which other planets cannot do"?the reply is that there are some people who unnecessarily exaggerate the evil results of mars. Most of the following points are not taken into consideration he stated 20 points

against kuja dosha:then how can we say that ksk advocated Kuja dosha analysis for match making.the reason for the para by Guruji as shown by you is that (as i feel)in the starting of the concept p.no. 55 :"when parents attempt to fix the marriage of their sons and the daughters, the so called mars dosha , interpreted by astrologers according to their whims and fancies , confuses them due to varying opinion given by them." after few lines :"let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion ":thats why he divided mars-dosha into three groups and said the anology of blood group (because ksk

tries to say that we has to match the chart having kuja dosha with a chart having similar dosha but not the other two variants,) therefore it is clear that KSK categorise Mars-dosha and stated his opinion only for those astrologers but not to his followers :"It is therefore , necessary that

astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of

mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the correct match"As per the mails of tinwinji i understood that the topic ended here, and later the last few paras were inserted So as to let the readers know how K.P. followers look at these "doshas" by taking only the sub-level significations and not the mere placement of mars in different signs.hope i am clear.i am not critising any one this iis what i understood about this concept.Guruji bless us all.Peace and Prosperity to All !!VGR--- On Mon, 7/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:Punit Pandey <punitpRe: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years... Date: Monday, 7 December, 2009, 12:50 AM

 

 

Dear Pavan ji,

 

It seem you are also mixing up two things. The Mars dosha section talks about two points -

1. Mars dosha for marriage matching

2. Mars dosha for predicting "difference of opinion, disagreement, dispute"

 

The section that has been appended later on in 1971 edition (starting from - To cause different of opinion ....) is for using Mars dosha for predicting difference of opinion, disagreement, disputes etc. Shri KSK himself clearly mentioned that any planet can do that. The study also proved the same point which Shri KSK has said. If you read my earlier email, I appreciated study for proving this point.

 

Though my point is that study didn't touch Mars dosha in marriage matching. Shri KSK said -

"It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise on the correct match."

 

It is clearly Shri KSK's opinion for using Mars dosha in "marriage matching" and not predicting on individual's horoscope. Point 1 (Mars dosha in marriage matching) was suggested by Shri KSK but not touched by study. My reason for writing the email was that people should not confuse that the study rejected both - mars dosha in prediction and mars dosha in marriage matching. The truth is that the study touched only mars dosha in prediction on individual's chart.

 

Generally Shri KSK was very truthful and blunt in calling a spade a spade. If he found that something is not working, he bluntly said that. Though when he says something to "weigh and consider various points of Mars Dosha", we should listen him till the time some study proves otherwise. We will have to wait for a study that checks bride and groom's chart simultaneously and conclude something. I hope now you got my point.

 

I do not have 1966 edition with me. Tw ji said that upto "It is, therefore, ..." is reprint of earlier edition of 1966. Which means "It is, therefore, ..." was the actual conclusion by Shri KSK and I do not think that there should be any doubt on it. He starts with that I'll tell you my opinion and finally he offers this opinion to "weigh and consider various points of Mars Dosha".

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 11:27 PM, vgr pavan <vgr_pavan1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Punitji pranam,Pardon for interfering ....the qoute in reader 4 is

"To cause difference of opinion, disagreement, dispute, divorce etc. among the couple it is not left

to Mars alone, any planet can cause such undesirable effect provided

they happen to be deposited in such a position, that the sublord ofthe planet is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 or the sublord is

deposited in a constellation, the lord of which is the significatorof 6 or 10 or 12".Guruji , also stressed that "any planet can cause "such" undesirable effect , So he is telling

that we need not give preference to "Mars" alone , any planet can cause such results. Again in the next para" If the sub lord is mars or if it is in the constellation of mars , and if is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 , there will be separation. If it is saturn , silence and remain dumb-stick and strike. thus we have to predict."

here also he said "separation" will be caused by mars only when he is sublord or sub tenanted star lord and significator for 6,10,12. but not with mere placement of mars in various signs from asc, moon, venus.

[in P.no. 194 under the head "Divorce""there is no mars dosha in this chart because it is in a movable sign , it is debilitated ; conjoined with mercury . Yet look at the fate . thus taking the position of mars and offering predictions which appear more like a curse is not correct . but take the planets situated in the star or sub of mars in 1,2,4,8,12 ,. then , that planet tenanted in such a mars star will offer undesirable and disagreeable results.]

point no. 3 "Shri KSK clearly mentioned it for compatibility matching"i think you are pointing the para above the para given by me, it reads as follows:

"It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the correct match":

in the starting of this explanation on mars dosha P.no.55 KSK mentioned that : "Let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion. "

So i think that upto the above para (p.no. 69 ) is what Gurujis explanation about various rules and the later paragraphs are his "final" opinion.(which are last paras of the topic) .

point no.4 guruji explained what vedic astrological rules for "Mars Dosha " are . but not instructed us to follow the same. These are my opinions .......

Peace and Prosperity to All !!VGR --- On Sun, 6/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years... @gro ups.comSunday, 6 December, 2009, 9:40 PM

 

 

Dear Tw ji,

 

1. Please tell clearly whether you are saying that 1966 is more authentic or 1971. I do not understand the reason for initial 6 points.

2. Even in 1971 edition, when we say that ".... it can not be left to Mars alone", it clearly means that Mars has impact, but it is not the "only" reason. Shri KSK were very clear about the impact of Mars dosha and that is the rason instead of rejecting it (which he has done quite often in readers for some other theories like Ashtakvarga) , he said that this is not the reason "alone."

3. Regarding point 7, the question is not whether everything is pre-destined or not. The question is whether it is correct to check Mars dosha on indiviaul's chart where Shri KSK clearly mentioned it for compatibility matching. Any conclusion drawn without considered both the partner's horoscope seems incomplete to me and against what Shri KSK has mentioned about it.

4. You also didn't answer my question, whether Moon and Venus were considered or not, apart from Ascendant, in the study? We must remember that Shri KSK clearly mentioned about inclusion of Moon and Venus with Ascendant while judging Mars dosha.

5. What ideas you are finding speculative? I am just quoting what Shri KSK has said and what proof you need more than what Shri KSK has said himself.

 

My objections and questions doesn't mean that I am try to belittle the study. The study is useful and establish that Mars dosha has limited or no value when it comes to predicting disagreement, dispute, and divorce etc. in marriage. It is a good and useful finding. Though the study doesn't tell anything about Mars dosha compatibility and we should be very clear about it. Most of the problems are said when Mars dosha doesn't match in bride and groom's chart and this is the utility of this theory in Hindu astrology (and Indian families). Also, in future study must be extended to include Moon and Venus, so that it can test the real definition of Mars dosha and not just an incomplete definition of Mars dosha. Till the time the scope of study is clear, people may confuse and think that Mars dosha is match making doesn't exist which is actually not convered in the study.

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 8:55 PM, TW <tw853 > wrote:

 

 

 

 

Dear Friends,

 

1. Mars dosha has been written in the KP Reader IV (Marriage, Married Life & Children) pages 51-69 (any Edition of reprinting). 2. Page 52, second and third parasOne may ask, "Why should they attach so much importance to the position of Mars alone? .......

The reply is that there are some people who unnessarily exaggerate the evil results of Mars.....3. Page 55, third paraLet me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion.

4. Page 69 fourth para It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise on the correct match.

5. Up to the above para is reprinted from the early writtings in the Krishnamurti Padhdhati Vol II, Sagar publications, 1966.6. Page 69 fourth to sixth paras are added in the mentioned KP Reader IV, first published in May 1971; fourth para is as given under:

To cause difference of opinion,disagreemen t, dispute, divorce etc. among the couple it is not left to Mars alone, any planet can cause such undesirable effect provided they happen to be deposited in such a position, that the sublord of the planet is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 or the sublord is deposited in a constellation, the lord of which is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12.

 

7. In KP, marriage matching, like education, occupation,death, is supposed to be predestined. 8. The speculative ideas would be sound, if and only if supported by a research study of sufficient numbers of charts other than here say experience or opinion.

 

Thanks and regards,

TW

 

@gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:>

 

 

 

 

 

> Dear Tw ji,> > I personally feel that the study missed few very basic but important points> and I would like to mention the same -> > 1. Problems due to Mars Dosha, tradionally as well as narrated by Shri KSK (

> http://logy. astrosage. com/mars- dosha), occurs only when the husband> and wife do not have same level of dosha. The problem exists only if a

> person having Mars dosha marries to the person who doesn't have Mars dosha> (even if we ignore level of dosha). The study seems to consider> only individual's chart and not two charts together. If it is studying

> only individual's chart, the study doesn't have much meaning. A study needs> to see Mars dosha in two situation and compare - a) mars dosha person> marriying to mars dosha person, b) mars dosha person not marring to Mars

> dosha person. Till the time we compare this two situation, how come we> conclude whether Mars Dosha works or not.> > 2. Traditonally as well as according to Shri KSK, Mars dosha should be> checked from Ascendant, Moon and Venus. It seems that study is considering

> only Ascedant and ignoring Moon and Venus. Again, if we do not follow the> definition properly, the conclusion reached can not be called correct.> > Here is the conclusion from your article -

> "It is to follow the KP rules only in considering longevity, matching,> separation, divorce, multi-marriage, happy or unhappy married life etc.> without mixing up with the traditional Manglik-to- Manglik matching rule and

> explain the public not to worry about Mars Dosha as suggested by Shri K.> Hariharan."> > Here again it seems that we are mixing up two things. KP does NOT provide> any tool for chart matching and Mars dosha is a tool for matching and not

> for prediction. KP clearly gives the rule for longevity etc., but doesn't> tell much about matching two charts. There is no doubt that KP is dependent> on traditional methods of horoscope matching as far as KP readers are

> concerned. This is the reason Koota as well as Mars dosha found place in KP.> In my opinion, the study is about Mars dosha as a predictive tool (which is> not discussed by Shri KSK) and NOT Mars dosha as a matching tool (which is

> discussed by Shri KSK).> > Thanks & Regards,> > Punit Pandey> >

> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:51 PM, TW tw853 wrote:> > >> >> > Dear Friends,> > What has been found is in the File section under:> > MARS DOSHA IN KP.doc

> > Regards,> > TW> >> >> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>, Punit

> > Pandey punitp@ wrote:> > >> > > Dear Friends,> > >> > > Here is what is found in third reader -> > >> > > http://logy. astrosage. com/mars- dosha

> > >> > > Thanks & Regards,> > >> > > Punit Pandey> > >> > >> > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Ramani kadavasalramani@ wrote:

> > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Shri Bansalj,> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Any kind of Mars Dosha including the Mars in 4th fron Lagna or Moon or

> > > > Venus gets cancelled when Mars is aspected by Saturn.> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Truly yours,> > > >> > > >

> > > >> > > > K.S.V.Ramani> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > ** @gro ups.com <%40. com>[

> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>] *On

> > > > Behalf Of *pankaj bansal> > > > *Sent:* 04 December 2009 22:50> > > >> > > > *To:* @gro ups.com <%40. com>

> > > > *Subject:* Re: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the> > years...> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >

> > > > Namaste Lajmiji,> > > >> > > > If Mars is placed In 4th house from> > > > Lagna & Venus and Placed in POORVASHADA Nakshatra(Venus) .Then there is No

> > So> > > > called Mars dosha and the Native Can Marriage anybody who had or had> > not> > > > mars dosha in this Birth Chart?Eagerly waiting for your precious> > response.

> > > >> > > > Thanks> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > ** Yogesh Lajmi yogeshlajmi@

> > > >> > > > *To:* @gro ups.com <%40. com>

 

 

 

 

> > > > *Cc:* Punit Pandey punitp@> > > > *Sent:* Fri, 4 December, 2009 8:05:18 PM> >> > > > *Subject:* MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Members,> > > >> > > > Not withstanding what has been averred by some "K.P.> > > > research scholars",

> > > >> > > > and whose research has been qestioned already in these columns by many> > KP> > > > followers,> > > >> > > > *and also,*my own experience about Mars Dosha,over the years,and after

> > > > analysing the charts of many a married couples,for marital> > > > problems,especially ,after marriage,I agree 100% with the observation> > in> > > > K.P. books that *Mars posited in Sun's star,or own star,and occuping

> > > > houses I,II,IV,VII, VIII & XII** **alone causes Mars Dosha**...*> > > >> > > > I invite the opinion of all members...on this very> > > > controversial matter,and I must add here that almost ALL of my clients

> > who> > > > come to consult me,strongly believe about the existence of Mars> > Dosha...so> > > > much so that they attribute almost every domestic problem to the> > existence

> > > > of Mars Dosha,and keep asking for *"remedies".. .* !> > > >> > > > Which I patiently have to explain in detail...based> > > > on their own experience in the practise of the K.P. System...

> > > >> > > > This is just to illustrate how deeply the ill-effects> > > > of Mars are embedded in the minds of people,at large...> > > >> > > > Am looking forward to comments from discerning

> > > > members...> > > >> > > > With kind regards,> > > >> > > > Yogesh Lajmi.> > > >> > > > * *> > > >

> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > Win 1 of 4 Sony home entertainment packs thanks to 7. Enter now<> > http://us.lrd. / _ylc=X3oDMTJxN2x 2ZmNpBF9zAzIwMjM 2MTY2MTMEdG1fZG1 lY2gDVGV4dCBMaW5 rBHRtX2xuawNVMTE wMzk3NwR0bV9uZXQ DWWFob28hBHRtX3B vcwN0YWdsaW5lBHR tX3BwdHkDYXVueg- -/SIG=14600t3ni/ **http%3A/ au.rd.. com/mail/ tagline/sony/ *http%3A/ au.docs.. com/homepageset/ %3Fp1=other% 26p2=au%26p3= mailtagline > > >> > > > .> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage<

> > http://in.rd. / tagline_yyi_ 1/*http:/ in.. com/>> > > > .> > > >

> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >>

 

 

 

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

 

 

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Dear Pavan ji,

 

// I  still didnt understand what is the difference between mars dosha for compatibility and mars causing seperation. //

As you know marriage matching is used to decide upon the horoscope of bride or groom. How Mars dosha is used tradionally? Is it used on single horoscope?

 

Marriage matching is done on two charts. It is not about making some prediction for individual but composite study of impact of two horoscopes on each other. KP doesn't have any method for marriage matching in readers and hence we can see development of KPDP later.

 

//1.) Our Guruji gave preference to stars  but not to the mere placement in a sign ,(like in vedic astrology). Even in star placements he went further and divided into sub divisions. He proved that the minute subdivisions are responsible in drastic changes in the lifes of the people born in the same place or twins.

In this context how it will be logical to belive that KSK suggested us to verify mars dosha (which deals only  with placement in a sign). //

Shri KSK also talked about mere placement of Saturn can cause Punarphoo (http://logy.astrosage.com/punarphoo). KP readers are full of such examples.

 

I agree it doesn't gel well with KP and I have written a seperate email about it. But it was Shri KSK's choice to include this article. Probably he found something important and that is the reason we find it in readers. His choice. Contradictions are nothing new in KP readers.

 

//3) why guruji suggested us to judge separately about longevity etc... If mars dosha can cause widowhood to either.//

You missed the point that the appended paragraphs were not conclusion. Please see my discussion with Tw ji and you will find that the conclusion is the paragraph where Shri KSK sugges weighing Mars Dosha in both the chart. 

 

The appended line, as those apply on individual chart, doesn't say anything about Mars dosha in marriage matching. If you will read tradional astrology books, you will also find application of Mars dosha in individual's horoscope and it is rejected by Shri KSK. The same is also proven by the study.

 

//then how can we say that ksk advocated Kuja dosha analysis for match making.//

Shri KSK neither rejected nor advocated Mars dosha because he didn't have any alternate for marriage matching at that time. He simply shared his opinion and left it up to future development. Mars dosha is not alone there are many cases that he left untouched for future.

 

Now Mars dosha exists in Astro Secrets (as also shared by Lajmi ji) and KPDP. Again it is individual's choice to accept or reject it.   

 

//therefore  it is clear that KSK categorise Mars-dosha and stated his opinion only for those astrologers but not to his followers : //

It is your interpretion. He starts with " let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion " and at then end of the article he offers his opinion that " It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the correct match. "

 

Now if we say that he referred astrologers to some other astrologers and not to his followers will be stretching it too far. He simply didn't have any alternate method of marriage matching and hence he draw that conclusion. Accept it or reject it is our choice, though it is the fact that KP readers do not offer any method for marriage matching. Lajmi ji vociferously advocate KPDP and I guess there are some other methods available as well if we see later KP literature. Need of KPDP tells absense of marriage matching method in KP.

 

What you are saying doesn't seem correct because of Shri KSK's nature of bluntly rejected the methods that doesn't work. He didn't reject it in the whole article. He is clearly recommending it to astrologers from above conclusion. Now assuming that these are some other astrologers and not KP followers, still he is recommending it to those astrologers and not rejecting it. I do not remember any other place in readers where Shri KSK has recommended some method to some astrologers and not to his followers. After all the readers are written for his followers and not for some other astrologers.  

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:02 PM, vgr pavan <vgr_pavan1 wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Punitji Pranam,I  still didnt understand what is the difference between mars dosha for compatibility and mars causing seperation.1.) Our Guruji gave preference to stars  but not to the mere placement in a sign ,(like in vedic astrology). Even in star placements he went further and divided into sub divisions. He proved that the minute subdivisions are responsible in drastic changes in the lifes of the people born in the same place or twins.

In this context how it will be logical to belive that KSK suggested us to verify mars dosha (which deals only  with placement in a sign). 2) KSK in many instances told that every one has to face the good or bad events in his life based upon the meritorious deeds done in his previous birth and no  chart has influence on others life. then how will be to think that mars placement in wifes chart will cause problems even though husbands chart indicating hormonious wedded life !

3) why guruji suggested us to judge separately about longevity etc... If mars dosha can cause widowhood to either.4) p.no. 52. Guruji stated as follows :One may ask, ' " why should they attach too much importance to the position of mars alone ? we had never heard anybody taking of moon`s dosha or any other planet`s dosha or sun`s dosha or any other  planets dosha . then does it mean that mars alone will do so much  harm to the couple to the couple which other planets cannot do " ?

the reply is that there are some people who unnecessarily exaggerate the evil results of mars. Most of the following points are not taken into consideration  he stated 20 points against kuja dosha:

then how can we say that ksk advocated Kuja dosha analysis for match making.the reason for the para by Guruji as shown by you  is that (as i feel)in the starting of the concept  p.no. 55 :

" when parents attempt  to fix the marriage of their sons and the daughters, the so called mars dosha , interpreted by astrologers according to their whims and fancies , confuses them due to varying opinion given by them. "  

  after few lines : " let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion " :thats why he divided mars-dosha into three groups and said the anology of blood group (because ksk tries to say that we has to match the chart having  kuja dosha with a chart having similar dosha but not the other two variants,)

therefore  it is clear that KSK categorise Mars-dosha and stated his opinion only for those astrologers but not to his followers : " It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the correct match "

As per the mails of tinwinji i understood that the topic  ended here, and later the last few paras were inserted So as to let the readers know how  K.P. followers look at these " doshas " by taking only the sub-level significations and not the mere placement of mars in different signs.

hope i am clear.i am not critising any one this iis what i understood about this concept.Guruji bless us all. Peace and Prosperity to All !!VGR

--- On Mon, 7/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:

 

Punit Pandey <punitpRe: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

Monday, 7 December, 2009, 12:50 AM

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Pavan ji,

 

It seem you are also mixing up two things. The Mars dosha section talks about two points -

1. Mars dosha for marriage matching

2. Mars dosha for predicting " difference of opinion, disagreement, dispute "

 

The section that has been appended later on in 1971 edition (starting from - To cause different of opinion ....) is for using Mars dosha for predicting difference of opinion, disagreement, disputes etc. Shri KSK himself clearly mentioned that any planet can do that. The study also proved the same point which Shri KSK has said. If you read my earlier email, I appreciated study for proving this point.

 

Though my point is that study didn't touch Mars dosha in marriage matching. Shri KSK said -

" It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh and  consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise on the correct match. "

 

It is clearly Shri KSK's opinion for using Mars dosha in " marriage matching " and not predicting on individual's horoscope. Point 1 (Mars dosha in marriage matching) was suggested by Shri KSK but not touched by study. My reason for writing the email was that people should not confuse that the study rejected both - mars dosha in prediction and mars dosha in marriage matching. The truth is that the study touched only mars dosha in prediction on individual's chart.

 

Generally Shri KSK was very truthful and blunt in calling a spade a spade. If he found that something is not working, he bluntly said that. Though when he says something to " weigh and consider various points of Mars Dosha " , we should listen him till the time some study proves otherwise. We will have to wait for a study that checks bride and groom's chart simultaneously and conclude something. I hope now you got my point.

 

I do not have 1966 edition with me. Tw ji said that upto " It is, therefore, ... " is reprint of earlier edition of 1966. Which means " It is, therefore, ... " was the actual conclusion by Shri KSK and I do not think that there should be any doubt on it. He starts with that I'll tell you my opinion and finally he offers this opinion to " weigh and consider various points of Mars Dosha " .

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

 

 

On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 11:27 PM, vgr pavan <vgr_pavan1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Punitji pranam,Pardon for interfering ....the qoute in reader 4 is

" To cause difference of opinion, disagreement, dispute, divorce etc. among the couple it is not left

to Mars alone, any planet can cause such undesirable effect provided

they happen to be deposited in such a position, that the sublord ofthe planet is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 or the sublord is

deposited in a constellation, the lord of which is the significatorof 6 or 10 or 12 " .Guruji , also stressed that " any planet can cause " such " undesirable effect , So he is telling

that we need not give preference to " Mars " alone , any planet can cause such results.   Again in the next  para " If the sub lord is mars or if it is in the constellation of mars , and if is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 , there will be separation. If it is saturn , silence and remain dumb-stick and strike. thus we have to predict. "

here also he said " separation " will be caused by mars  only when he is sublord or sub tenanted star lord and significator for 6,10,12.  but not with mere placement of mars in various signs from asc, moon, venus.

 [in P.no. 194 under the head " Divorce " " there is no mars dosha in this chart because it is in a movable sign , it is debilitated ; conjoined with mercury . Yet look at the fate . thus taking the position of mars and offering predictions which appear more like a curse is not correct . but take the planets situated in the  star or sub of mars in 1,2,4,8,12 ,. then , that planet tenanted in such a mars star will offer undesirable and disagreeable results.]   

point no. 3    " Shri KSK clearly mentioned it for compatibility matching " i think you are pointing the para above the para given by me, it reads as follows:

" It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the correct match " :

in the starting of this explanation on mars dosha P.no.55  KSK mentioned that  : " Let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion. "

So i think that upto the above para (p.no. 69 ) is what Gurujis explanation about various rules and the later paragraphs are his " final " opinion.(which are last paras of the topic) .

point no.4 guruji explained what vedic astrological rules for " Mars Dosha " are . but not instructed us to follow the same. These are my opinions .......

Peace and Prosperity to All !!VGR --- On Sun, 6/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

 

@gro ups.com

 

 

Sunday, 6 December, 2009, 9:40 PM

 

 

 

Dear Tw ji,

 

1. Please tell clearly whether you are saying that 1966 is more authentic or 1971. I do not understand the reason for initial 6 points.

2. Even in 1971 edition, when we say that " .... it can not be left to Mars alone " , it clearly means that Mars has impact, but it is not the " only " reason. Shri KSK were very clear about the impact of Mars dosha and that is the rason instead of rejecting it (which he has done quite often in readers for some other theories like Ashtakvarga) , he said that this is not the reason " alone. "

3. Regarding point 7, the question is not whether everything is pre-destined or not. The question is whether it is correct to check Mars dosha on indiviaul's chart where Shri KSK clearly mentioned it for compatibility matching. Any conclusion drawn without considered both the partner's horoscope seems incomplete to me and against what Shri KSK has mentioned about it.

4. You also didn't answer my question, whether Moon and Venus were considered or not, apart from Ascendant, in the study? We must remember that Shri KSK clearly mentioned about inclusion of Moon and Venus with Ascendant while judging Mars dosha.

5. What ideas you are finding speculative? I am just quoting what Shri KSK has said and what proof you need more than what Shri KSK has said himself.

 

My objections and questions doesn't mean that I am try to belittle the study. The study is useful and establish that Mars dosha has limited or no value when it comes to predicting disagreement, dispute, and divorce etc. in marriage. It is a good and useful finding. Though the study doesn't tell anything about Mars dosha compatibility and we should be very clear about it. Most of the problems are said when Mars dosha doesn't match in bride and groom's chart and this is the utility of this theory in Hindu astrology (and Indian families). Also, in future study must be extended to include Moon and Venus, so that it can test the real definition of Mars dosha and not just an incomplete definition of Mars dosha. Till the time the scope of study is clear, people may confuse and think that Mars dosha is match making doesn't exist which is actually not convered in the study.

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 8:55 PM, TW <tw853 > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Friends,

 

1. Mars dosha has been written in the KP Reader IV (Marriage, Married Life & Children) pages 51-69 (any Edition of reprinting). 2. Page 52, second and third parasOne may ask, " Why should they attach so much importance to the position of Mars alone? .......

The reply is that there are some people who unnessarily exaggerate the evil results of Mars.....3. Page 55, third paraLet me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion.

4. Page 69 fourth para It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise on the correct match.   

5. Up to the above para is reprinted from the early writtings in the Krishnamurti Padhdhati Vol II, Sagar publications, 1966.6. Page 69 fourth to sixth paras are added in the mentioned KP Reader IV, first published in May 1971; fourth para is as given under:

To cause difference of opinion,disagreemen t, dispute, divorce etc. among the couple it is not left to Mars alone, any planet can cause such undesirable effect provided they happen to be deposited in such a position, that the sublord of the planet is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 or the sublord is deposited in a constellation, the lord of which is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12. 

 

7. In KP, marriage matching, like education, occupation,death, is supposed to be predestined. 8. The speculative ideas would be sound, if and only if supported by a research study of sufficient numbers of charts other than here say experience or opinion.

 

Thanks and regards,

TW

 

@gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:>

 

 

 

 

 

> Dear Tw ji,> > I personally feel that the study missed few very basic but important points> and I would like to mention the same -> > 1. Problems due to Mars Dosha, tradionally as well as narrated by Shri KSK (

> http://logy. astrosage. com/mars- dosha), occurs only when the husband> and wife do not have same level of dosha. The problem exists only if a

> person having Mars dosha marries to the person who doesn't have Mars dosha> (even if we ignore level of dosha). The study seems to consider> only individual's chart and not two charts together. If it is studying

> only individual's chart, the study doesn't have much meaning. A study needs> to see Mars dosha in two situation and compare - a) mars dosha person> marriying to mars dosha person, b) mars dosha person not marring to Mars

> dosha person. Till the time we compare this two situation, how come we> conclude whether Mars Dosha works or not.> > 2. Traditonally as well as according to Shri KSK, Mars dosha should be> checked from Ascendant, Moon and Venus. It seems that study is considering

> only Ascedant and ignoring Moon and Venus. Again, if we do not follow the> definition properly, the conclusion reached can not be called correct.> > Here is the conclusion from your article -

> " It is to follow the KP rules only in considering longevity, matching,> separation, divorce, multi-marriage, happy or unhappy married life etc.> without mixing up with the traditional Manglik-to- Manglik matching rule and

> explain the public not to worry about Mars Dosha as suggested by Shri K.> Hariharan. " > > Here again it seems that we are mixing up two things. KP does NOT provide> any tool for chart matching and Mars dosha is a tool for matching and not

> for prediction. KP clearly gives the rule for longevity etc., but doesn't> tell much about matching two charts. There is no doubt that KP is dependent> on traditional methods of horoscope matching as far as KP readers are

> concerned. This is the reason Koota as well as Mars dosha found place in KP.> In my opinion, the study is about Mars dosha as a predictive tool (which is> not discussed by Shri KSK) and NOT Mars dosha as a matching tool (which is

> discussed by Shri KSK).> > Thanks & Regards,> > Punit Pandey> >

> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:51 PM, TW tw853 wrote:> > >> >> > Dear Friends,> > What has been found is in the File section under:> > MARS DOSHA IN KP.doc

> > Regards,> > TW> >> >> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>, Punit

> > Pandey punitp@ wrote:> > >> > > Dear Friends,> > >> > > Here is what is found in third reader -> > >> > > http://logy. astrosage. com/mars- dosha

> > >> > > Thanks & Regards,> > >> > > Punit Pandey> > >> > >> > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Ramani kadavasalramani@ wrote:

> > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Shri Bansalj,> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Any kind of Mars Dosha including the Mars in 4th fron Lagna or Moon or

> > > > Venus gets cancelled when Mars is aspected by Saturn.> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Truly yours,> > > >> > > >

> > > >> > > > K.S.V.Ramani> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > ** @gro ups.com <%40. com>[

> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>] *On

> > > > Behalf Of *pankaj bansal> > > > *Sent:* 04 December 2009 22:50> > > >> > > > *To:* @gro ups.com <%40. com>

> > > > *Subject:* Re: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the> > years...> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >

> > > > Namaste Lajmiji,> > > >> > > > If Mars is placed In 4th house from> > > > Lagna & Venus and Placed in POORVASHADA Nakshatra(Venus) .Then there is No

> > So> > > > called Mars dosha and the Native Can Marriage anybody who had or had> > not> > > > mars dosha in this Birth Chart?Eagerly waiting for your precious> > response.

> > > >> > > > Thanks> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > ** Yogesh Lajmi yogeshlajmi@

> > > >> > > > *To:* @gro ups.com <%40. com>

 

 

 

 

> > > > *Cc:* Punit Pandey punitp@> > > > *Sent:* Fri, 4 December, 2009 8:05:18 PM> >> > > > *Subject:* MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Members,> > > >> > > > Not withstanding what has been averred by some " K.P.> > > > research scholars " ,

> > > >> > > > and whose research has been qestioned already in these columns by many> > KP> > > > followers,> > > >> > > > *and also,*my own experience about Mars Dosha,over the years,and after

> > > > analysing the charts of many a married couples,for marital> > > > problems,especially ,after marriage,I agree 100% with the observation> > in> > > > K.P. books that *Mars posited in Sun's star,or own star,and occuping

> > > > houses I,II,IV,VII, VIII & XII** **alone causes Mars Dosha**...*> > > >> > > > I invite the opinion of all members...on this very> > > > controversial matter,and I must add here that almost ALL of my clients

> > who> > > > come to consult me,strongly believe about the existence of Mars> > Dosha...so> > > > much so that they attribute almost every domestic problem to the> > existence

> > > > of Mars Dosha,and keep asking for * " remedies " .. .* !> > > >> > > > Which I patiently have to explain in detail...based> > > > on their own experience in the practise of the K.P. System...

> > > >> > > > This is just to illustrate how deeply the ill-effects> > > > of Mars are embedded in the minds of people,at large...> > > >> > > > Am looking forward to comments from discerning

> > > > members...> > > >> > > > With kind regards,> > > >> > > > Yogesh Lajmi.> > > >> > > > * *> > > >

> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > Win 1 of 4 Sony home entertainment packs thanks to 7. Enter now<> > http://us.lrd. / _ylc=X3oDMTJxN2x 2ZmNpBF9zAzIwMjM 2MTY2MTMEdG1fZG1 lY2gDVGV4dCBMaW5 rBHRtX2xuawNVMTE wMzk3NwR0bV9uZXQ DWWFob28hBHRtX3B vcwN0YWdsaW5lBHR tX3BwdHkDYXVueg- -/SIG=14600t3ni/ **http%3A/ au.rd.. com/mail/ tagline/sony/ *http%3A/ au.docs.. com/homepageset/ %3Fp1=other% 26p2=au%26p3= mailtagline > > >> > > > .> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage<

> > http://in.rd. / tagline_yyi_ 1/*http:/ in.. com/>> > > > .> > > >

> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

 

 

 

 

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

punitji pranam,waiting for your reply on point 4 .regardsPeace and Prosperity to All !!VGR--- On Tue, 8/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:Punit Pandey <punitpRe: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years... Date: Tuesday, 8 December, 2009, 5:29 PM

 

 

Dear Pavan ji,

 

// I still didnt understand what is the difference between mars dosha for compatibility and mars causing seperation. //

As you know marriage matching is used to decide upon the horoscope of bride or groom. How Mars dosha is used tradionally? Is it used on single horoscope?

 

Marriage matching is done on two charts. It is not about making some prediction for individual but composite study of impact of two horoscopes on each other. KP doesn't have any method for marriage matching in readers and hence we can see development of KPDP later.

 

//1.) Our Guruji gave preference to stars but not to the mere placement in a sign ,(like in vedic astrology). Even in star placements he went further and divided into sub divisions. He proved that the minute subdivisions are responsible in drastic changes in the lifes of the people born in the same place or twins.

In this context how it will be logical to belive that KSK suggested us to verify mars dosha (which deals only with placement in a sign). //

Shri KSK also talked about mere placement of Saturn can cause Punarphoo (http://logy. astrosage. com/punarphoo). KP readers are full of such examples.

 

I agree it doesn't gel well with KP and I have written a seperate email about it. But it was Shri KSK's choice to include this article. Probably he found something important and that is the reason we find it in readers. His choice. Contradictions are nothing new in KP readers.

 

//3) why guruji suggested us to judge separately about longevity etc... If mars dosha can cause widowhood to either.//

You missed the point that the appended paragraphs were not conclusion. Please see my discussion with Tw ji and you will find that the conclusion is the paragraph where Shri KSK sugges weighing Mars Dosha in both the chart.

 

The appended line, as those apply on individual chart, doesn't say anything about Mars dosha in marriage matching. If you will read tradional astrology books, you will also find application of Mars dosha in individual's horoscope and it is rejected by Shri KSK. The same is also proven by the study.

 

//then how can we say that ksk advocated Kuja dosha analysis for match making.//

Shri KSK neither rejected nor advocated Mars dosha because he didn't have any alternate for marriage matching at that time. He simply shared his opinion and left it up to future development. Mars dosha is not alone there are many cases that he left untouched for future.

 

Now Mars dosha exists in Astro Secrets (as also shared by Lajmi ji) and KPDP. Again it is individual's choice to accept or reject it.

 

//therefore it is clear that KSK categorise Mars-dosha and stated his opinion only for those astrologers but not to his followers : //

It is your interpretion. He starts with "let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion" and at then end of the article he offers his opinion that "It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the correct match."

 

Now if we say that he referred astrologers to some other astrologers and not to his followers will be stretching it too far. He simply didn't have any alternate method of marriage matching and hence he draw that conclusion. Accept it or reject it is our choice, though it is the fact that KP readers do not offer any method for marriage matching. Lajmi ji vociferously advocate KPDP and I guess there are some other methods available as well if we see later KP literature. Need of KPDP tells absense of marriage matching method in KP.

 

What you are saying doesn't seem correct because of Shri KSK's nature of bluntly rejected the methods that doesn't work. He didn't reject it in the whole article. He is clearly recommending it to astrologers from above conclusion. Now assuming that these are some other astrologers and not KP followers, still he is recommending it to those astrologers and not rejecting it. I do not remember any other place in readers where Shri KSK has recommended some method to some astrologers and not to his followers. After all the readers are written for his followers and not for some other astrologers.

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:02 PM, vgr pavan <vgr_pavan1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Punitji Pranam,I still didnt understand what is the difference between mars dosha for compatibility and mars causing seperation.1.) Our Guruji gave preference to stars but not to the mere placement in a sign ,(like in vedic astrology). Even in star placements he went further and divided into sub divisions. He proved that the minute subdivisions are responsible in drastic changes in the lifes of the people born in the same place or twins.

In this context how it will be logical to belive that KSK suggested us to verify mars dosha (which deals only with placement in a sign). 2) KSK in many instances told that every one has to face the good or bad events in his life based upon the meritorious deeds done in his previous birth and no chart has influence on others life. then how will be to think that mars placement in wifes chart will cause problems even though husbands chart indicating hormonious wedded life !

3) why guruji suggested us to judge separately about longevity etc... If mars dosha can cause widowhood to either.4) p.no. 52. Guruji stated as follows :One may ask, '"why should they attach too much importance to the position of mars alone ? we had never heard anybody taking of moon`s dosha or any other planet`s dosha or sun`s dosha or any other planets dosha . then does it mean that mars alone will do so much harm to the couple to the couple which other planets cannot do"?

the reply is that there are some people who unnecessarily exaggerate the evil results of mars. Most of the following points are not taken into consideration he stated 20 points against kuja dosha:

then how can we say that ksk advocated Kuja dosha analysis for match making.the reason for the para by Guruji as shown by you is that (as i feel)in the starting of the concept p.no. 55 :

"when parents attempt to fix the marriage of their sons and the daughters, the so called mars dosha , interpreted by astrologers according to their whims and fancies , confuses them due to varying opinion given by them."

after few lines :"let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion ":thats why he divided mars-dosha into three groups and said the anology of blood group (because ksk tries to say that we has to match the chart having kuja dosha with a chart having similar dosha but not the other two variants,)

therefore it is clear that KSK categorise Mars-dosha and stated his opinion only for those astrologers but not to his followers : "It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the correct match"

As per the mails of tinwinji i understood that the topic ended here, and later the last few paras were inserted So as to let the readers know how K.P. followers look at these "doshas" by taking only the sub-level significations and not the mere placement of mars in different signs.

hope i am clear.i am not critising any one this iis what i understood about this concept.Guruji bless us all. Peace and Prosperity to All !!VGR

--- On Mon, 7/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...@gro ups.com

Monday, 7 December, 2009, 12:50 AM

 

 

 

 

Dear Pavan ji,

 

It seem you are also mixing up two things. The Mars dosha section talks about two points -

1. Mars dosha for marriage matching

2. Mars dosha for predicting "difference of opinion, disagreement, dispute"

 

The section that has been appended later on in 1971 edition (starting from - To cause different of opinion ....) is for using Mars dosha for predicting difference of opinion, disagreement, disputes etc. Shri KSK himself clearly mentioned that any planet can do that. The study also proved the same point which Shri KSK has said. If you read my earlier email, I appreciated study for proving this point.

 

Though my point is that study didn't touch Mars dosha in marriage matching. Shri KSK said -

"It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise on the correct match."

 

It is clearly Shri KSK's opinion for using Mars dosha in "marriage matching" and not predicting on individual's horoscope. Point 1 (Mars dosha in marriage matching) was suggested by Shri KSK but not touched by study. My reason for writing the email was that people should not confuse that the study rejected both - mars dosha in prediction and mars dosha in marriage matching. The truth is that the study touched only mars dosha in prediction on individual's chart.

 

Generally Shri KSK was very truthful and blunt in calling a spade a spade. If he found that something is not working, he bluntly said that. Though when he says something to "weigh and consider various points of Mars Dosha", we should listen him till the time some study proves otherwise. We will have to wait for a study that checks bride and groom's chart simultaneously and conclude something. I hope now you got my point.

 

I do not have 1966 edition with me. Tw ji said that upto "It is, therefore, ..." is reprint of earlier edition of 1966. Which means "It is, therefore, ..." was the actual conclusion by Shri KSK and I do not think that there should be any doubt on it. He starts with that I'll tell you my opinion and finally he offers this opinion to "weigh and consider various points of Mars Dosha".

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

 

 

On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 11:27 PM, vgr pavan <vgr_pavan1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Punitji pranam,Pardon for interfering ....the qoute in reader 4 is

"To cause difference of opinion, disagreement, dispute, divorce etc. among the couple it is not left

to Mars alone, any planet can cause such undesirable effect provided

they happen to be deposited in such a position, that the sublord ofthe planet is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 or the sublord is

deposited in a constellation, the lord of which is the significatorof 6 or 10 or 12".Guruji , also stressed that "any planet can cause "such" undesirable effect , So he is telling

that we need not give preference to "Mars" alone , any planet can cause such results. Again in the next para" If the sub lord is mars or if it is in the constellation of mars , and if is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 , there will be separation. If it is saturn , silence and remain dumb-stick and strike. thus we have to predict."

here also he said "separation" will be caused by mars only when he is sublord or sub tenanted star lord and significator for 6,10,12. but not with mere placement of mars in various signs from asc, moon, venus.

[in P.no. 194 under the head "Divorce""there is no mars dosha in this chart because it is in a movable sign , it is debilitated ; conjoined with mercury . Yet look at the fate . thus taking the position of mars and offering predictions which appear more like a curse is not correct . but take the planets situated in the star or sub of mars in 1,2,4,8,12 ,. then , that planet tenanted in such a mars star will offer undesirable and disagreeable results.]

point no. 3 "Shri KSK clearly mentioned it for compatibility matching"i think you are pointing the para above the para given by me, it reads as follows:

"It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the correct match":

in the starting of this explanation on mars dosha P.no.55 KSK mentioned that : "Let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion. "

So i think that upto the above para (p.no. 69 ) is what Gurujis explanation about various rules and the later paragraphs are his "final" opinion.(which are last paras of the topic) .

point no.4 guruji explained what vedic astrological rules for "Mars Dosha " are . but not instructed us to follow the same. These are my opinions .......

Peace and Prosperity to All !!VGR --- On Sun, 6/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

 

@gro ups.com

 

 

Sunday, 6 December, 2009, 9:40 PM

 

 

Dear Tw ji,

 

1. Please tell clearly whether you are saying that 1966 is more authentic or 1971. I do not understand the reason for initial 6 points.

2. Even in 1971 edition, when we say that ".... it can not be left to Mars alone", it clearly means that Mars has impact, but it is not the "only" reason. Shri KSK were very clear about the impact of Mars dosha and that is the rason instead of rejecting it (which he has done quite often in readers for some other theories like Ashtakvarga) , he said that this is not the reason "alone."

3. Regarding point 7, the question is not whether everything is pre-destined or not. The question is whether it is correct to check Mars dosha on indiviaul's chart where Shri KSK clearly mentioned it for compatibility matching. Any conclusion drawn without considered both the partner's horoscope seems incomplete to me and against what Shri KSK has mentioned about it.

4. You also didn't answer my question, whether Moon and Venus were considered or not, apart from Ascendant, in the study? We must remember that Shri KSK clearly mentioned about inclusion of Moon and Venus with Ascendant while judging Mars dosha.

5. What ideas you are finding speculative? I am just quoting what Shri KSK has said and what proof you need more than what Shri KSK has said himself.

 

My objections and questions doesn't mean that I am try to belittle the study. The study is useful and establish that Mars dosha has limited or no value when it comes to predicting disagreement, dispute, and divorce etc. in marriage. It is a good and useful finding. Though the study doesn't tell anything about Mars dosha compatibility and we should be very clear about it. Most of the problems are said when Mars dosha doesn't match in bride and groom's chart and this is the utility of this theory in Hindu astrology (and Indian families). Also, in future study must be extended to include Moon and Venus, so that it can test the real definition of Mars dosha and not just an incomplete definition of Mars dosha. Till the time the scope of study is clear, people may confuse and think that Mars dosha is match making doesn't exist which is actually not convered in the study.

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 8:55 PM, TW <tw853 > wrote:

 

 

 

 

Dear Friends,

 

1. Mars dosha has been written in the KP Reader IV (Marriage, Married Life & Children) pages 51-69 (any Edition of reprinting). 2. Page 52, second and third parasOne may ask, "Why should they attach so much importance to the position of Mars alone? .......

The reply is that there are some people who unnessarily exaggerate the evil results of Mars.....3. Page 55, third paraLet me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion.

4. Page 69 fourth para It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise on the correct match.

5. Up to the above para is reprinted from the early writtings in the Krishnamurti Padhdhati Vol II, Sagar publications, 1966.6. Page 69 fourth to sixth paras are added in the mentioned KP Reader IV, first published in May 1971; fourth para is as given under:

To cause difference of opinion,disagreemen t, dispute, divorce etc. among the couple it is not left to Mars alone, any planet can cause such undesirable effect provided they happen to be deposited in such a position, that the sublord of the planet is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 or the sublord is deposited in a constellation, the lord of which is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12.

 

7. In KP, marriage matching, like education, occupation,death, is supposed to be predestined. 8. The speculative ideas would be sound, if and only if supported by a research study of sufficient numbers of charts other than here say experience or opinion.

 

Thanks and regards,

TW

 

@gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:>

 

 

 

 

 

> Dear Tw ji,> > I personally feel that the study missed few very basic but important points> and I would like to mention the same -> > 1. Problems due to Mars Dosha, tradionally as well as narrated by Shri KSK (

> http://logy. astrosage. com/mars- dosha), occurs only when the husband> and wife do not have same level of dosha. The problem exists only if a

> person having Mars dosha marries to the person who doesn't have Mars dosha> (even if we ignore level of dosha). The study seems to consider> only individual's chart and not two charts together. If it is studying

> only individual's chart, the study doesn't have much meaning. A study needs> to see Mars dosha in two situation and compare - a) mars dosha person> marriying to mars dosha person, b) mars dosha person not marring to Mars

> dosha person. Till the time we compare this two situation, how come we> conclude whether Mars Dosha works or not.> > 2. Traditonally as well as according to Shri KSK, Mars dosha should be> checked from Ascendant, Moon and Venus. It seems that study is considering

> only Ascedant and ignoring Moon and Venus. Again, if we do not follow the> definition properly, the conclusion reached can not be called correct.> > Here is the conclusion from your article -

> "It is to follow the KP rules only in considering longevity, matching,> separation, divorce, multi-marriage, happy or unhappy married life etc.> without mixing up with the traditional Manglik-to- Manglik matching rule and

> explain the public not to worry about Mars Dosha as suggested by Shri K.> Hariharan."> > Here again it seems that we are mixing up two things. KP does NOT provide> any tool for chart matching and Mars dosha is a tool for matching and not

> for prediction. KP clearly gives the rule for longevity etc., but doesn't> tell much about matching two charts. There is no doubt that KP is dependent> on traditional methods of horoscope matching as far as KP readers are

> concerned. This is the reason Koota as well as Mars dosha found place in KP.> In my opinion, the study is about Mars dosha as a predictive tool (which is> not discussed by Shri KSK) and NOT Mars dosha as a matching tool (which is

> discussed by Shri KSK).> > Thanks & Regards,> > Punit Pandey> >

> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:51 PM, TW tw853 wrote:> > >> >> > Dear Friends,> > What has been found is in the File section under:> > MARS DOSHA IN KP.doc

> > Regards,> > TW> >> >> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>, Punit

> > Pandey punitp@ wrote:> > >> > > Dear Friends,> > >> > > Here is what is found in third reader -> > >> > > http://logy. astrosage. com/mars- dosha

> > >> > > Thanks & Regards,> > >> > > Punit Pandey> > >> > >> > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Ramani kadavasalramani@ wrote:

> > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Shri Bansalj,> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Any kind of Mars Dosha including the Mars in 4th fron Lagna or Moon or

> > > > Venus gets cancelled when Mars is aspected by Saturn.> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Truly yours,> > > >> > > >

> > > >> > > > K.S.V.Ramani> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > ** @gro ups.com <%40. com>[

> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>] *On

> > > > Behalf Of *pankaj bansal> > > > *Sent:* 04 December 2009 22:50> > > >> > > > *To:* @gro ups.com <%40. com>

> > > > *Subject:* Re: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the> > years...> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >

> > > > Namaste Lajmiji,> > > >> > > > If Mars is placed In 4th house from> > > > Lagna & Venus and Placed in POORVASHADA Nakshatra(Venus) .Then there is No

> > So> > > > called Mars dosha and the Native Can Marriage anybody who had or had> > not> > > > mars dosha in this Birth Chart?Eagerly waiting for your precious> > response.

> > > >> > > > Thanks> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > ** Yogesh Lajmi yogeshlajmi@

> > > >> > > > *To:* @gro ups.com <%40. com>

 

 

 

 

> > > > *Cc:* Punit Pandey punitp@> > > > *Sent:* Fri, 4 December, 2009 8:05:18 PM> >> > > > *Subject:* MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Members,> > > >> > > > Not withstanding what has been averred by some "K.P.> > > > research scholars",

> > > >> > > > and whose research has been qestioned already in these columns by many> > KP> > > > followers,> > > >> > > > *and also,*my own experience about Mars Dosha,over the years,and after

> > > > analysing the charts of many a married couples,for marital> > > > problems,especially ,after marriage,I agree 100% with the observation> > in> > > > K.P. books that *Mars posited in Sun's star,or own star,and occuping

> > > > houses I,II,IV,VII, VIII & XII** **alone causes Mars Dosha**...*> > > >> > > > I invite the opinion of all members...on this very> > > > controversial matter,and I must add here that almost ALL of my clients

> > who> > > > come to consult me,strongly believe about the existence of Mars> > Dosha...so> > > > much so that they attribute almost every domestic problem to the> > existence

> > > > of Mars Dosha,and keep asking for *"remedies".. .* !> > > >> > > > Which I patiently have to explain in detail...based> > > > on their own experience in the practise of the K.P. System...

> > > >> > > > This is just to illustrate how deeply the ill-effects> > > > of Mars are embedded in the minds of people,at large...> > > >> > > > Am looking forward to comments from discerning

> > > > members...> > > >> > > > With kind regards,> > > >> > > > Yogesh Lajmi.> > > >> > > > * *> > > >

> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > Win 1 of 4 Sony home entertainment packs thanks to 7. Enter now<> > http://us.lrd. / _ylc=X3oDMTJxN2x 2ZmNpBF9zAzIwMjM 2MTY2MTMEdG1fZG1 lY2gDVGV4dCBMaW5 rBHRtX2xuawNVMTE wMzk3NwR0bV9uZXQ DWWFob28hBHRtX3B vcwN0YWdsaW5lBHR tX3BwdHkDYXVueg- -/SIG=14600t3ni/ **http%3A/ au.rd.. com/mail/ tagline/sony/ *http%3A/ au.docs.. com/homepageset/ %3Fp1=other% 26p2=au%26p3= mailtagline > > >> > > > .> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage<

> > http://in.rd. / tagline_yyi_ 1/*http:/ in.. com/>> > > > .> > > >

> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

 

 

 

 

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

 

 

 

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Dear Pavan ji,

 

According to him the Mars dosha, as it is judged traditionally, is not correct. He recommends us to consider those 20 points while judging Mars dosha. This is another differentiator of the article. 

 

He is trying to answer the question which he asked himself. He also says that there are people who unnecessary exaggerate Mars dosha without considering 20 given points. In other words, Mars dosha should be judged keeping those 20 points in mind.  

 

Does it not mean that he is recommending Mars dosha under some of his recommendations that he kept telling in the article?

 

It is not rejection, but a correction to traditional understating IMO.

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 6:16 PM, vgr pavan <vgr_pavan1 wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

punitji pranam,waiting for your reply on point 4 .regards Peace and Prosperity to All !!VGR

--- On Tue, 8/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:

 

Punit Pandey <punitpRe: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

Tuesday, 8 December, 2009, 5:29 PM

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Pavan ji,

 

// I  still didnt understand what is the difference between mars dosha for compatibility and mars causing seperation. //

As you know marriage matching is used to decide upon the horoscope of bride or groom. How Mars dosha is used tradionally? Is it used on single horoscope?

 

Marriage matching is done on two charts. It is not about making some prediction for individual but composite study of impact of two horoscopes on each other. KP doesn't have any method for marriage matching in readers and hence we can see development of KPDP later.

 

//1.) Our Guruji gave preference to stars  but not to the mere placement in a sign ,(like in vedic astrology). Even in star placements he went further and divided into sub divisions. He proved that the minute subdivisions are responsible in drastic changes in the lifes of the people born in the same place or twins.

In this context how it will be logical to belive that KSK suggested us to verify mars dosha (which deals only  with placement in a sign). //

Shri KSK also talked about mere placement of Saturn can cause Punarphoo (http://logy. astrosage. com/punarphoo). KP readers are full of such examples.

 

I agree it doesn't gel well with KP and I have written a seperate email about it. But it was Shri KSK's choice to include this article. Probably he found something important and that is the reason we find it in readers. His choice. Contradictions are nothing new in KP readers.

 

//3) why guruji suggested us to judge separately about longevity etc... If mars dosha can cause widowhood to either.//

You missed the point that the appended paragraphs were not conclusion. Please see my discussion with Tw ji and you will find that the conclusion is the paragraph where Shri KSK sugges weighing Mars Dosha in both the chart. 

 

The appended line, as those apply on individual chart, doesn't say anything about Mars dosha in marriage matching. If you will read tradional astrology books, you will also find application of Mars dosha in individual's horoscope and it is rejected by Shri KSK. The same is also proven by the study.

 

//then how can we say that ksk advocated Kuja dosha analysis for match making.//

Shri KSK neither rejected nor advocated Mars dosha because he didn't have any alternate for marriage matching at that time. He simply shared his opinion and left it up to future development. Mars dosha is not alone there are many cases that he left untouched for future.

 

Now Mars dosha exists in Astro Secrets (as also shared by Lajmi ji) and KPDP. Again it is individual's choice to accept or reject it.   

 

//therefore  it is clear that KSK categorise Mars-dosha and stated his opinion only for those astrologers but not to his followers : //

It is your interpretion. He starts with " let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion " and at then end of the article he offers his opinion that " It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the correct match. "

 

Now if we say that he referred astrologers to some other astrologers and not to his followers will be stretching it too far. He simply didn't have any alternate method of marriage matching and hence he draw that conclusion. Accept it or reject it is our choice, though it is the fact that KP readers do not offer any method for marriage matching. Lajmi ji vociferously advocate KPDP and I guess there are some other methods available as well if we see later KP literature. Need of KPDP tells absense of marriage matching method in KP.

 

What you are saying doesn't seem correct because of Shri KSK's nature of bluntly rejected the methods that doesn't work. He didn't reject it in the whole article. He is clearly recommending it to astrologers from above conclusion. Now assuming that these are some other astrologers and not KP followers, still he is recommending it to those astrologers and not rejecting it. I do not remember any other place in readers where Shri KSK has recommended some method to some astrologers and not to his followers. After all the readers are written for his followers and not for some other astrologers.  

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

 

 

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:02 PM, vgr pavan <vgr_pavan1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Punitji Pranam,I  still didnt understand what is the difference between mars dosha for compatibility and mars causing seperation.1.) Our Guruji gave preference to stars  but not to the mere placement in a sign ,(like in vedic astrology). Even in star placements he went further and divided into sub divisions. He proved that the minute subdivisions are responsible in drastic changes in the lifes of the people born in the same place or twins.

In this context how it will be logical to belive that KSK suggested us to verify mars dosha (which deals only  with placement in a sign). 2) KSK in many instances told that every one has to face the good or bad events in his life based upon the meritorious deeds done in his previous birth and no  chart has influence on others life. then how will be to think that mars placement in wifes chart will cause problems even though husbands chart indicating hormonious wedded life !

3) why guruji suggested us to judge separately about longevity etc... If mars dosha can cause widowhood to either.4) p.no. 52. Guruji stated as follows :

One may ask, ' " why should they attach too much importance to the position of mars alone ? we had never heard anybody taking of moon`s dosha or any other planet`s dosha or sun`s dosha or any other  planets dosha . then does it mean that mars alone will do so much  harm to the couple to the couple which other planets cannot do " ?

the reply is that there are some people who unnecessarily exaggerate the evil results of mars. Most of the following points are not taken into consideration  he stated 20 points against kuja dosha:

then how can we say that ksk advocated Kuja dosha analysis for match making.the reason for the para by Guruji as shown by you  is that (as i feel)in the starting of the concept  p.no. 55 :

" when parents attempt  to fix the marriage of their sons and the daughters, the so called mars dosha , interpreted by astrologers according to their whims and fancies , confuses them due to varying opinion given by them. "  

  after few lines : " let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion " :thats why he divided mars-dosha into three groups and said the anology of blood group (because ksk tries to say that we has to match the chart having  kuja dosha with a chart having similar dosha but not the other two variants,)

therefore  it is clear that KSK categorise Mars-dosha and stated his opinion only for those astrologers but not to his followers : " It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the correct match "

As per the mails of tinwinji i understood that the topic  ended here, and later the last few paras were inserted So as to let the readers know how  K.P. followers look at these " doshas " by taking only the sub-level significations and not the mere placement of mars in different signs.

hope i am clear.i am not critising any one this iis what i understood about this concept.Guruji bless us all. Peace and Prosperity to All !!VGR

--- On Mon, 7/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

@gro ups.com

 

 

Monday, 7 December, 2009, 12:50 AM

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Pavan ji,

 

It seem you are also mixing up two things. The Mars dosha section talks about two points -

1. Mars dosha for marriage matching

2. Mars dosha for predicting " difference of opinion, disagreement, dispute "

 

The section that has been appended later on in 1971 edition (starting from - To cause different of opinion ....) is for using Mars dosha for predicting difference of opinion, disagreement, disputes etc. Shri KSK himself clearly mentioned that any planet can do that. The study also proved the same point which Shri KSK has said. If you read my earlier email, I appreciated study for proving this point.

 

Though my point is that study didn't touch Mars dosha in marriage matching. Shri KSK said -

" It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh and  consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise on the correct match. "

 

It is clearly Shri KSK's opinion for using Mars dosha in " marriage matching " and not predicting on individual's horoscope. Point 1 (Mars dosha in marriage matching) was suggested by Shri KSK but not touched by study. My reason for writing the email was that people should not confuse that the study rejected both - mars dosha in prediction and mars dosha in marriage matching. The truth is that the study touched only mars dosha in prediction on individual's chart.

 

Generally Shri KSK was very truthful and blunt in calling a spade a spade. If he found that something is not working, he bluntly said that. Though when he says something to " weigh and consider various points of Mars Dosha " , we should listen him till the time some study proves otherwise. We will have to wait for a study that checks bride and groom's chart simultaneously and conclude something. I hope now you got my point.

 

I do not have 1966 edition with me. Tw ji said that upto " It is, therefore, ... " is reprint of earlier edition of 1966. Which means " It is, therefore, ... " was the actual conclusion by Shri KSK and I do not think that there should be any doubt on it. He starts with that I'll tell you my opinion and finally he offers this opinion to " weigh and consider various points of Mars Dosha " .

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

 

 

On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 11:27 PM, vgr pavan <vgr_pavan1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Punitji pranam,Pardon for interfering ....the qoute in reader 4 is

" To cause difference of opinion, disagreement, dispute, divorce etc. among the couple it is not left

to Mars alone, any planet can cause such undesirable effect provided

they happen to be deposited in such a position, that the sublord ofthe planet is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 or the sublord is

deposited in a constellation, the lord of which is the significatorof 6 or 10 or 12 " .Guruji , also stressed that " any planet can cause " such " undesirable effect , So he is telling

that we need not give preference to " Mars " alone , any planet can cause such results.   Again in the next  para " If the sub lord is mars or if it is in the constellation of mars , and if is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 , there will be separation. If it is saturn , silence and remain dumb-stick and strike. thus we have to predict. "

here also he said " separation " will be caused by mars  only when he is sublord or sub tenanted star lord and significator for 6,10,12.  but not with mere placement of mars in various signs from asc, moon, venus.

 [in P.no. 194 under the head " Divorce " " there is no mars dosha in this chart because it is in a movable sign , it is debilitated ; conjoined with mercury . Yet look at the fate . thus taking the position of mars and offering predictions which appear more like a curse is not correct . but take the planets situated in the  star or sub of mars in 1,2,4,8,12 ,. then , that planet tenanted in such a mars star will offer undesirable and disagreeable results.]   

point no. 3    " Shri KSK clearly mentioned it for compatibility matching " i think you are pointing the para above the para given by me, it reads as follows:

" It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the correct match " :

in the starting of this explanation on mars dosha P.no.55  KSK mentioned that  : " Let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion. "

So i think that upto the above para (p.no. 69 ) is what Gurujis explanation about various rules and the later paragraphs are his " final " opinion.(which are last paras of the topic) .

point no.4 guruji explained what vedic astrological rules for " Mars Dosha " are . but not instructed us to follow the same. These are my opinions .......

Peace and Prosperity to All !!VGR --- On Sun, 6/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

 

@gro ups.com

 

 

Sunday, 6 December, 2009, 9:40 PM

 

 

 

Dear Tw ji,

 

1. Please tell clearly whether you are saying that 1966 is more authentic or 1971. I do not understand the reason for initial 6 points.

2. Even in 1971 edition, when we say that " .... it can not be left to Mars alone " , it clearly means that Mars has impact, but it is not the " only " reason. Shri KSK were very clear about the impact of Mars dosha and that is the rason instead of rejecting it (which he has done quite often in readers for some other theories like Ashtakvarga) , he said that this is not the reason " alone. "

3. Regarding point 7, the question is not whether everything is pre-destined or not. The question is whether it is correct to check Mars dosha on indiviaul's chart where Shri KSK clearly mentioned it for compatibility matching. Any conclusion drawn without considered both the partner's horoscope seems incomplete to me and against what Shri KSK has mentioned about it.

4. You also didn't answer my question, whether Moon and Venus were considered or not, apart from Ascendant, in the study? We must remember that Shri KSK clearly mentioned about inclusion of Moon and Venus with Ascendant while judging Mars dosha.

5. What ideas you are finding speculative? I am just quoting what Shri KSK has said and what proof you need more than what Shri KSK has said himself.

 

My objections and questions doesn't mean that I am try to belittle the study. The study is useful and establish that Mars dosha has limited or no value when it comes to predicting disagreement, dispute, and divorce etc. in marriage. It is a good and useful finding. Though the study doesn't tell anything about Mars dosha compatibility and we should be very clear about it. Most of the problems are said when Mars dosha doesn't match in bride and groom's chart and this is the utility of this theory in Hindu astrology (and Indian families). Also, in future study must be extended to include Moon and Venus, so that it can test the real definition of Mars dosha and not just an incomplete definition of Mars dosha. Till the time the scope of study is clear, people may confuse and think that Mars dosha is match making doesn't exist which is actually not convered in the study.

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 8:55 PM, TW <tw853 > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Friends,

 

1. Mars dosha has been written in the KP Reader IV (Marriage, Married Life & Children) pages 51-69 (any Edition of reprinting). 2. Page 52, second and third parasOne may ask, " Why should they attach so much importance to the position of Mars alone? .......

The reply is that there are some people who unnessarily exaggerate the evil results of Mars.....3. Page 55, third paraLet me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion.

4. Page 69 fourth para It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise on the correct match.   

5. Up to the above para is reprinted from the early writtings in the Krishnamurti Padhdhati Vol II, Sagar publications, 1966.6. Page 69 fourth to sixth paras are added in the mentioned KP Reader IV, first published in May 1971; fourth para is as given under:

To cause difference of opinion,disagreemen t, dispute, divorce etc. among the couple it is not left to Mars alone, any planet can cause such undesirable effect provided they happen to be deposited in such a position, that the sublord of the planet is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 or the sublord is deposited in a constellation, the lord of which is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12. 

 

7. In KP, marriage matching, like education, occupation,death, is supposed to be predestined. 8. The speculative ideas would be sound, if and only if supported by a research study of sufficient numbers of charts other than here say experience or opinion.

 

Thanks and regards,

TW

 

@gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:>

 

 

 

 

 

> Dear Tw ji,> > I personally feel that the study missed few very basic but important points> and I would like to mention the same -> > 1. Problems due to Mars Dosha, tradionally as well as narrated by Shri KSK (

> http://logy. astrosage. com/mars- dosha), occurs only when the husband> and wife do not have same level of dosha. The problem exists only if a

> person having Mars dosha marries to the person who doesn't have Mars dosha> (even if we ignore level of dosha). The study seems to consider> only individual's chart and not two charts together. If it is studying

> only individual's chart, the study doesn't have much meaning. A study needs> to see Mars dosha in two situation and compare - a) mars dosha person> marriying to mars dosha person, b) mars dosha person not marring to Mars

> dosha person. Till the time we compare this two situation, how come we> conclude whether Mars Dosha works or not.> > 2. Traditonally as well as according to Shri KSK, Mars dosha should be> checked from Ascendant, Moon and Venus. It seems that study is considering

> only Ascedant and ignoring Moon and Venus. Again, if we do not follow the> definition properly, the conclusion reached can not be called correct.> > Here is the conclusion from your article -

> " It is to follow the KP rules only in considering longevity, matching,> separation, divorce, multi-marriage, happy or unhappy married life etc.> without mixing up with the traditional Manglik-to- Manglik matching rule and

> explain the public not to worry about Mars Dosha as suggested by Shri K.> Hariharan. " > > Here again it seems that we are mixing up two things. KP does NOT provide> any tool for chart matching and Mars dosha is a tool for matching and not

> for prediction. KP clearly gives the rule for longevity etc., but doesn't> tell much about matching two charts. There is no doubt that KP is dependent> on traditional methods of horoscope matching as far as KP readers are

> concerned. This is the reason Koota as well as Mars dosha found place in KP.> In my opinion, the study is about Mars dosha as a predictive tool (which is> not discussed by Shri KSK) and NOT Mars dosha as a matching tool (which is

> discussed by Shri KSK).> > Thanks & Regards,> > Punit Pandey> >

> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:51 PM, TW tw853 wrote:> > >> >> > Dear Friends,> > What has been found is in the File section under:> > MARS DOSHA IN KP.doc

> > Regards,> > TW> >> >> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>, Punit

> > Pandey punitp@ wrote:> > >> > > Dear Friends,> > >> > > Here is what is found in third reader -> > >> > > http://logy. astrosage. com/mars- dosha

> > >> > > Thanks & Regards,> > >> > > Punit Pandey> > >> > >> > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Ramani kadavasalramani@ wrote:

> > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Shri Bansalj,> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Any kind of Mars Dosha including the Mars in 4th fron Lagna or Moon or

> > > > Venus gets cancelled when Mars is aspected by Saturn.> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Truly yours,> > > >> > > >

> > > >> > > > K.S.V.Ramani> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > ** @gro ups.com <%40. com>[

> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>] *On

> > > > Behalf Of *pankaj bansal> > > > *Sent:* 04 December 2009 22:50> > > >> > > > *To:* @gro ups.com <%40. com>

> > > > *Subject:* Re: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the> > years...> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >

> > > > Namaste Lajmiji,> > > >> > > > If Mars is placed In 4th house from> > > > Lagna & Venus and Placed in POORVASHADA Nakshatra(Venus) .Then there is No

> > So> > > > called Mars dosha and the Native Can Marriage anybody who had or had> > not> > > > mars dosha in this Birth Chart?Eagerly waiting for your precious> > response.

> > > >> > > > Thanks> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > ** Yogesh Lajmi yogeshlajmi@

> > > >> > > > *To:* @gro ups.com <%40. com>

 

 

 

 

> > > > *Cc:* Punit Pandey punitp@> > > > *Sent:* Fri, 4 December, 2009 8:05:18 PM> >> > > > *Subject:* MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Members,> > > >> > > > Not withstanding what has been averred by some " K.P.> > > > research scholars " ,

> > > >> > > > and whose research has been qestioned already in these columns by many> > KP> > > > followers,> > > >> > > > *and also,*my own experience about Mars Dosha,over the years,and after

> > > > analysing the charts of many a married couples,for marital> > > > problems,especially ,after marriage,I agree 100% with the observation> > in> > > > K.P. books that *Mars posited in Sun's star,or own star,and occuping

> > > > houses I,II,IV,VII, VIII & XII** **alone causes Mars Dosha**...*> > > >> > > > I invite the opinion of all members...on this very> > > > controversial matter,and I must add here that almost ALL of my clients

> > who> > > > come to consult me,strongly believe about the existence of Mars> > Dosha...so> > > > much so that they attribute almost every domestic problem to the> > existence

> > > > of Mars Dosha,and keep asking for * " remedies " .. .* !> > > >> > > > Which I patiently have to explain in detail...based> > > > on their own experience in the practise of the K.P. System...

> > > >> > > > This is just to illustrate how deeply the ill-effects> > > > of Mars are embedded in the minds of people,at large...> > > >> > > > Am looking forward to comments from discerning

> > > > members...> > > >> > > > With kind regards,> > > >> > > > Yogesh Lajmi.> > > >> > > > * *> > > >

> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > Win 1 of 4 Sony home entertainment packs thanks to 7. Enter now<> > http://us.lrd. / _ylc=X3oDMTJxN2x 2ZmNpBF9zAzIwMjM 2MTY2MTMEdG1fZG1 lY2gDVGV4dCBMaW5 rBHRtX2xuawNVMTE wMzk3NwR0bV9uZXQ DWWFob28hBHRtX3B vcwN0YWdsaW5lBHR tX3BwdHkDYXVueg- -/SIG=14600t3ni/ **http%3A/ au.rd.. com/mail/ tagline/sony/ *http%3A/ au.docs.. com/homepageset/ %3Fp1=other% 26p2=au%26p3= mailtagline > > >> > > > .> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage<

> > http://in.rd. / tagline_yyi_ 1/*http:/ in.. com/>> > > > .> > > >

> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Dear Members,I have a basic question. We understand from KP that every horoscope is UNIQUE. Then why do we try to match two horoscopes which are unique in nature? Here the matching can be read as finding compatibilty between two horoscopes. Compatible on certain aspects. Why do we need to do this? Is it not an exercise in futility?.RegardsGopalSent from my BlackBerry®powered by Sinyal Kuat INDOSAT Punit Pandey <punitpTue, 8 Dec 2009 17:29:10 +0530Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years... Dear Pavan ji, // I  still didnt understand what is the difference between mars dosha for compatibility and mars causing seperation. //As you know marriage matching is used to decide upon the horoscope of bride or groom. How Mars dosha is used tradionally? Is it used on single horoscope?  Marriage matching is done on two charts. It is not about making some prediction for individual but composite study of impact of two horoscopes on each other. KP doesn't have any method for marriage matching in readers and hence we can see development of KPDP later. //1.) Our Guruji gave preference to stars  but not to the mere placement in a sign ,(like in vedic astrology). Even in star placements he went further and divided into sub divisions. He proved that the minute subdivisions are responsible in drastic changes in the lifes of the people born in the same place or twins.In this context how it will be logical to belive that KSK suggested us to verify mars dosha (which deals only  with placement in a sign). //Shri KSK also talked about mere placement of Saturn can cause Punarphoo (http://logy.astrosage.com/punarphoo). KP readers are full of such examples.  I agree it doesn't gel well with KP and I have written a seperate email about it. But it was Shri KSK's choice to include this article. Probably he found something important and that is the reason we find it in readers. His choice. Contradictions are nothing new in KP readers.  //3) why guruji suggested us to judge separately about longevity etc... If mars dosha can cause widowhood to either.//You missed the point that the appended paragraphs were not conclusion. Please see my discussion with Tw ji and you will find that the conclusion is the paragraph where Shri KSK sugges weighing Mars Dosha in both the chart.  The appended line, as those apply on individual chart, doesn't say anything about Mars dosha in marriage matching. If you will read tradional astrology books, you will also find application of Mars dosha in individual's horoscope and it is rejected by Shri KSK. The same is also proven by the study.  //then how can we say that ksk advocated Kuja dosha analysis for match making.//Shri KSK neither rejected nor advocated Mars dosha because he didn't have any alternate for marriage matching at that time. He simply shared his opinion and left it up to future development. Mars dosha is not alone there are many cases that he left untouched for future. Now Mars dosha exists in Astro Secrets (as also shared by Lajmi ji) and KPDP. Again it is individual's choice to accept or reject it.    //therefore  it is clear that KSK categorise Mars-dosha and stated his opinion only for those astrologers but not to his followers : //It is your interpretion. He starts with " let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion " and at then end of the article he offers his opinion that " It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the correct match. "  Now if we say that he referred astrologers to some other astrologers and not to his followers will be stretching it too far. He simply didn't have any alternate method of marriage matching and hence he draw that conclusion. Accept it or reject it is our choice, though it is the fact that KP readers do not offer any method for marriage matching. Lajmi ji vociferously advocate KPDP and I guess there are some other methods available as well if we see later KP literature. Need of KPDP tells absense of marriage matching method in KP.  What you are saying doesn't seem correct because of Shri KSK's nature of bluntly rejected the methods that doesn't work. He didn't reject it in the whole article. He is clearly recommending it to astrologers from above conclusion. Now assuming that these are some other astrologers and not KP followers, still he is recommending it to those astrologers and not rejecting it. I do not remember any other place in readers where Shri KSK has recommended some method to some astrologers and not to his followers. After all the readers are written for his followers and not for some other astrologers.   Thanks & Regards,Punit PandeyOn Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:02 PM, vgr pavan <vgr_pavan1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote:  Punitji Pranam,I  still didnt understand what is the difference between mars dosha for compatibility and mars causing seperation.1.) Our Guruji gave preference to stars  but not to the mere placement in a sign ,(like in vedic astrology). Even in star placements he went further and divided into sub divisions. He proved that the minute subdivisions are responsible in drastic changes in the lifes of the people born in the same place or twins.In this context how it will be logical to belive that KSK suggested us to verify mars dosha (which deals only  with placement in a sign). 2) KSK in many instances told that every one has to face the good or bad events in his life based upon the meritorious deeds done in his previous birth and no  chart has influence on others life. then how will be to think that mars placement in wifes chart will cause problems even though husbands chart indicating hormonious wedded life !3) why guruji suggested us to judge separately about longevity etc... If mars dosha can cause widowhood to either.4) p.no. 52. Guruji stated as follows :One may ask, ' " why should they attach too much importance to the position of mars alone ? we had never heard anybody taking of moon`s dosha or any other planet`s dosha or sun`s dosha or any other  planets dosha . then does it mean that mars alone will do so much  harm to the couple to the couple which other planets cannot do " ?the reply is that there are some people who unnecessarily exaggerate the evil results of mars. Most of the following points are not taken into consideration  he stated 20 points against kuja dosha:then how can we say that ksk advocated Kuja dosha analysis for match making.the reason for the para by Guruji as shown by you  is that (as i feel)in the starting of the concept  p.no. 55 : " when parents attempt  to fix the marriage of their sons and the daughters, the so called mars dosha , interpreted by astrologers according to their whims and fancies , confuses them due to varying opinion given by them. "     after few lines : " let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion " :thats why he divided mars-dosha into three groups and said the anology of blood group (because ksk tries to say that we has to match the chart having  kuja dosha with a chart having similar dosha but not the other two variants,) therefore  it is clear that KSK categorise Mars-dosha and stated his opinion only for those astrologers but not to his followers : " It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the correct match " As per the mails of tinwinji i understood that the topic  ended here, and later the last few paras were inserted So as to let the readers know how  K.P. followers look at these " doshas " by taking only the sub-level significations and not the mere placement of mars in different signs.hope i am clear.i am not critising any one this iis what i understood about this concept.Guruji bless us all. Peace and Prosperity to All !!VGR--- On Mon, 7/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp > wrote:Punit Pandey <punitp >Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years... Date: Monday, 7 December, 2009, 12:50 AM  Dear Pavan ji, It seem you are also mixing up two things. The Mars dosha section talks about two points -1. Mars dosha for marriage matching2. Mars dosha for predicting " difference of opinion, disagreement, dispute "  The section that has been appended later on in 1971 edition (starting from - To cause different of opinion ....) is for using Mars dosha for predicting difference of opinion, disagreement, disputes etc. Shri KSK himself clearly mentioned that any planet can do that. The study also proved the same point which Shri KSK has said. If you read my earlier email, I appreciated study for proving this point.  Though my point is that study didn't touch Mars dosha in marriage matching. Shri KSK said - " It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh and  consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise on the correct match. "  It is clearly Shri KSK's opinion for using Mars dosha in " marriage matching " and not predicting on individual's horoscope. Point 1 (Mars dosha in marriage matching) was suggested by Shri KSK but not touched by study. My reason for writing the email was that people should not confuse that the study rejected both - mars dosha in prediction and mars dosha in marriage matching. The truth is that the study touched only mars dosha in prediction on individual's chart.  Generally Shri KSK was very truthful and blunt in calling a spade a spade. If he found that something is not working, he bluntly said that. Though when he says something to " weigh and consider various points of Mars Dosha " , we should listen him till the time some study proves otherwise. We will have to wait for a study that checks bride and groom's chart simultaneously and conclude something. I hope now you got my point.  I do not have 1966 edition with me. Tw ji said that upto " It is, therefore, ... " is reprint of earlier edition of 1966. Which means " It is, therefore, ... " was the actual conclusion by Shri KSK and I do not think that there should be any doubt on it. He starts with that I'll tell you my opinion and finally he offers this opinion to " weigh and consider various points of Mars Dosha " .Thanks & Regards,Punit PandeyOn Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 11:27 PM, vgr pavan <vgr_pavan1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote:  Punitji pranam,Pardon for interfering ....the qoute in reader 4 is " To cause difference of opinion, disagreement, dispute, divorce etc. among the couple it is not leftto Mars alone, any planet can cause such undesirable effect providedthey happen to be deposited in such a position, that the sublord ofthe planet is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 or the sublord isdeposited in a constellation, the lord of which is the significatorof 6 or 10 or 12 " .Guruji , also stressed that " any planet can cause " such " undesirable effect , So he is telling that we need not give preference to " Mars " alone , any planet can cause such results.   Again in the next  para " If the sub lord is mars or if it is in the constellation of mars , and if is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 , there will be separation. If it is saturn , silence and remain dumb-stick and strike. thus we have to predict. " here also he said " separation " will be caused by mars  only when he is sublord or sub tenanted star lord and significator for 6,10,12.  but not with mere placement of mars in various signs from asc, moon, venus.  [in P.no. 194 under the head " Divorce " " there is no mars dosha in this chart because it is in a movable sign , it is debilitated ; conjoined with mercury . Yet look at the fate . thus taking the position of mars and offering predictions which appear more like a curse is not correct . but take the planets situated in the  star or sub of mars in 1,2,4,8,12 ,. then , that planet tenanted in such a mars star will offer undesirable and disagreeable results.]    point no. 3    " Shri KSK clearly mentioned it for compatibility matching " i think you are pointing the para above the para given by me, it reads as follows: " It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the correct match " : in the starting of this explanation on mars dosha P.no.55  KSK mentioned that  : " Let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion. " So i think that upto the above para (p.no. 69 ) is what Gurujis explanation about various rules and the later paragraphs are his " final " opinion.(which are last paras of the topic) .point no.4 guruji explained what vedic astrological rules for " Mars Dosha " are . but not instructed us to follow the same. These are my opinions .......Peace and Prosperity to All !!VGR --- On Sun, 6/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years... @gro ups.comSunday, 6 December, 2009, 9:40 PM  Dear Tw ji, 1. Please tell clearly whether you are saying that 1966 is more authentic or 1971. I do not understand the reason for initial 6 points. 2. Even in 1971 edition, when we say that " .... it can not be left to Mars alone " , it clearly means that Mars has impact, but it is not the " only " reason. Shri KSK were very clear about the impact of Mars dosha and that is the rason instead of rejecting it (which he has done quite often in readers for some other theories like Ashtakvarga) , he said that this is not the reason " alone. " 3. Regarding point 7, the question is not whether everything is pre-destined or not. The question is whether it is correct to check Mars dosha on indiviaul's chart where Shri KSK clearly mentioned it for compatibility matching. Any conclusion drawn without considered both the partner's horoscope seems incomplete to me and against what Shri KSK has mentioned about it. 4. You also didn't answer my question, whether Moon and Venus were considered or not, apart from Ascendant, in the study? We must remember that Shri KSK clearly mentioned about inclusion of Moon and Venus with Ascendant while judging Mars dosha. 5. What ideas you are finding speculative? I am just quoting what Shri KSK has said and what proof you need more than what Shri KSK has said himself.  My objections and questions doesn't mean that I am try to belittle the study. The study is useful and establish that Mars dosha has limited or no value when it comes to predicting disagreement, dispute, and divorce etc. in marriage. It is a good and useful finding. Though the study doesn't tell anything about Mars dosha compatibility and we should be very clear about it. Most of the problems are said when Mars dosha doesn't match in bride and groom's chart and this is the utility of this theory in Hindu astrology (and Indian families). Also, in future study must be extended to include Moon and Venus, so that it can test the real definition of Mars dosha and not just an incomplete definition of Mars dosha. Till the time the scope of study is clear, people may confuse and think that Mars dosha is match making doesn't exist which is actually not convered in the study.  Thanks & Regards,Punit PandeyOn Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 8:55 PM, TW <tw853 > wrote:  Dear Friends,1. Mars dosha has been written in the KP Reader IV (Marriage, Married Life & Children) pages 51-69 (any Edition of reprinting). 2. Page 52, second and third parasOne may ask, " Why should they attach so much importance to the position of Mars alone? .......The reply is that there are some people who unnessarily exaggerate the evil results of Mars.....3. Page 55, third paraLet me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion.4. Page 69 fourth para It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise on the correct match.    5. Up to the above para is reprinted from the early writtings in the Krishnamurti Padhdhati Vol II, Sagar publications, 1966.6. Page 69 fourth to sixth paras are added in the mentioned KP Reader IV, first published in May 1971; fourth para is as given under:To cause difference of opinion,disagreemen t, dispute, divorce etc. among the couple it is not left to Mars alone, any planet can cause such undesirable effect provided they happen to be deposited in such a position, that the sublord of the planet is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 or the sublord is deposited in a constellation, the lord of which is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12.  7. In KP, marriage matching, like education, occupation,death, is supposed to be predestined. 8. The speculative ideas would be sound, if and only if supported by a research study of sufficient numbers of charts other than here say experience or opinion.Thanks and regards, TW @gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:>> Dear Tw ji,> > I personally feel that the study missed few very basic but important points> and I would like to mention the same -> > 1. Problems due to Mars Dosha, tradionally as well as narrated by Shri KSK (> http://logy. astrosage. com/mars- dosha), occurs only when the husband> and wife do not have same level of dosha. The problem exists only if a> person having Mars dosha marries to the person who doesn't have Mars dosha> (even if we ignore level of dosha). The study seems to consider> only individual's chart and not two charts together. If it is studying> only individual's chart, the study doesn't have much meaning. A study needs> to see Mars dosha in two situation and compare - a) mars dosha person> marriying to mars dosha person, b) mars dosha person not marring to Mars> dosha person. Till the time we compare this two situation, how come we> conclude whether Mars Dosha works or not.> > 2. Traditonally as well as according to Shri KSK, Mars dosha should be> checked from Ascendant, Moon and Venus. It seems that study is considering> only Ascedant and ignoring Moon and Venus. Again, if we do not follow the> definition properly, the conclusion reached can not be called correct.> > Here is the conclusion from your article -> " It is to follow the KP rules only in considering longevity, matching,> separation, divorce, multi-marriage, happy or unhappy married life etc.> without mixing up with the traditional Manglik-to- Manglik matching rule and> explain the public not to worry about Mars Dosha as suggested by Shri K.> Hariharan. " > > Here again it seems that we are mixing up two things. KP does NOT provide> any tool for chart matching and Mars dosha is a tool for matching and not> for prediction. KP clearly gives the rule for longevity etc., but doesn't> tell much about matching two charts. There is no doubt that KP is dependent> on traditional methods of horoscope matching as far as KP readers are> concerned. This is the reason Koota as well as Mars dosha found place in KP.> In my opinion, the study is about Mars dosha as a predictive tool (which is> not discussed by Shri KSK) and NOT Mars dosha as a matching tool (which is> discussed by Shri KSK).> > Thanks & Regards,> > Punit Pandey> > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:51 PM, TW tw853 wrote:> > >> >> > Dear Friends,> > What has been found is in the File section under:> > MARS DOSHA IN KP.doc> > Regards,> > TW> >> >> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>, Punit > > Pandey punitp@ wrote:> > >> > > Dear Friends,> > >> > > Here is what is found in third reader -> > >> > > http://logy. astrosage. com/mars- dosha> > >> > > Thanks & Regards,> > >> > > Punit Pandey> > >> > >> > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Ramani kadavasalramani@ wrote:> > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Shri Bansalj,> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Any kind of Mars Dosha including the Mars in 4th fron Lagna or Moon or> > > > Venus gets cancelled when Mars is aspected by Saturn.> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Truly yours,> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > K.S.V.Ramani> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > ** @gro ups.com <%40. com>[> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>] *On > > > > Behalf Of *pankaj bansal> > > > *Sent:* 04 December 2009 22:50> > > >> > > > *To:* @gro ups.com <%40. com> > > > > *Subject:* Re: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the> > years...> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Namaste Lajmiji,> > > >> > > > If Mars is placed In 4th house from> > > > Lagna & Venus and Placed in POORVASHADA Nakshatra(Venus) .Then there is No> > So> > > > called Mars dosha and the Native Can Marriage anybody who had or had> > not> > > > mars dosha in this Birth Chart?Eagerly waiting for your precious> > response.> > > >> > > > Thanks> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > ** Yogesh Lajmi yogeshlajmi@> > > >> > > > *To:* @gro ups.com <%40. com> > > > > *Cc:* Punit Pandey punitp@> > > > *Sent:* Fri, 4 December, 2009 8:05:18 PM> >> > > > *Subject:* MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Members,> > > >> > > > Not withstanding what has been averred by some " K.P.> > > > research scholars " ,> > > >> > > > and whose research has been qestioned already in these columns by many> > KP> > > > followers,> > > >> > > > *and also,*my own experience about Mars Dosha,over the years,and after> > > > analysing the charts of many a married couples,for marital> > > > problems,especially ,after marriage,I agree 100% with the observation> > in> > > > K.P. books that *Mars posited in Sun's star,or own star,and occuping> > > > houses I,II,IV,VII, VIII & XII** **alone causes Mars Dosha**...*> > > >> > > > I invite the opinion of all members...on this very> > > > controversial matter,and I must add here that almost ALL of my clients> > who> > > > come to consult me,strongly believe about the existence of Mars> > Dosha...so> > > > much so that they attribute almost every domestic problem to the> > existence> > > > of Mars Dosha,and keep asking for * " remedies " .. .* !> > > >> > > > Which I patiently have to explain in detail...based> > > > on their own experience in the practise of the K.P. System...> > > >> > > > This is just to illustrate how deeply the ill-effects> > > > of Mars are embedded in the minds of people,at large...> > > >> > > > Am looking forward to comments from discerning> > > > members...> > > >> > > > With kind regards,> > > >> > > > Yogesh Lajmi.> > > >> > > > * *> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > Win 1 of 4 Sony home entertainment packs thanks to 7. Enter now<> > http://us.lrd. /_ylc=X3oDMTJxN2x 2ZmNpBF9zAzIwMjM 2MTY2MTMEdG1fZG1 lY2gDVGV4dCBMaW5 rBHRtX2xuawNVMTE wMzk3NwR0bV9uZXQ DWWFob28hBHRtX3B vcwN0YWdsaW5lBHR tX3BwdHkDYXVueg- -/SIG=14600t3ni/ **http%3A/ au.rd.. com/mail/ tagline/sony/ *http%3A/ au.docs.. com/homepageset/ %3Fp1=other% 26p2=au%26p3= mailtagline > > >> > > > .> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage<> > http://in.rd. / tagline_yyi_ 1/*http:/ in.. com/>> > > > .> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >>The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage. The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Dear Gopal ji,

 

The is a tricky question you have asked. Discussion on matching horoscope definitely seems to contradict teachings of KP.

 

The uniqueness of horoscope is not limited to KP, but it is also unique in traditional. For example, a shastiamsa changes much faster than a sub.

 

In KP, horoscope is not only unique but also defined. Which means that KP believe in the concept that all small or big events in one's life are defined. Everything is destined and nothing can be changed by any mean like japa, mantra or any other form of remedies. Whether knowing future or matching horoscope doesn't make any difference in one's life. This is all done " just " for the peace of the mind.

 Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 7:16 PM, <subragops3 wrote:

 

 

 

 

Dear Members,I have a basic question. We understand from KP that every horoscope is UNIQUE. Then why do we try to match two horoscopes which are unique in nature? Here the matching can be read as finding compatibilty between two horoscopes. Compatible on certain aspects. Why do we need to do this? Is it not an exercise in futility?.

RegardsGopal Sent from my BlackBerry®powered by Sinyal Kuat INDOSAT

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp

Tue, 8 Dec 2009 17:29:10 +0530

 

 

 

 

Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

 

 

Dear Pavan ji,

 

// I  still didnt understand what is the difference between mars dosha for compatibility and mars causing seperation. //

As you know marriage matching is used to decide upon the horoscope of bride or groom. How Mars dosha is used tradionally? Is it used on single horoscope?

 

Marriage matching is done on two charts. It is not about making some prediction for individual but composite study of impact of two horoscopes on each other. KP doesn't have any method for marriage matching in readers and hence we can see development of KPDP later.

 

//1.) Our Guruji gave preference to stars  but not to the mere placement in a sign ,(like in vedic astrology). Even in star placements he went further and divided into sub divisions. He proved that the minute subdivisions are responsible in drastic changes in the lifes of the people born in the same place or twins.

In this context how it will be logical to belive that KSK suggested us to verify mars dosha (which deals only  with placement in a sign). //

Shri KSK also talked about mere placement of Saturn can cause Punarphoo (http://logy.astrosage.com/punarphoo). KP readers are full of such examples.

 

I agree it doesn't gel well with KP and I have written a seperate email about it. But it was Shri KSK's choice to include this article. Probably he found something important and that is the reason we find it in readers. His choice. Contradictions are nothing new in KP readers.

 

//3) why guruji suggested us to judge separately about longevity etc... If mars dosha can cause widowhood to either.//

You missed the point that the appended paragraphs were not conclusion. Please see my discussion with Tw ji and you will find that the conclusion is the paragraph where Shri KSK sugges weighing Mars Dosha in both the chart. 

 

The appended line, as those apply on individual chart, doesn't say anything about Mars dosha in marriage matching. If you will read tradional astrology books, you will also find application of Mars dosha in individual's horoscope and it is rejected by Shri KSK. The same is also proven by the study.

 

//then how can we say that ksk advocated Kuja dosha analysis for match making.//

Shri KSK neither rejected nor advocated Mars dosha because he didn't have any alternate for marriage matching at that time. He simply shared his opinion and left it up to future development. Mars dosha is not alone there are many cases that he left untouched for future.

 

Now Mars dosha exists in Astro Secrets (as also shared by Lajmi ji) and KPDP. Again it is individual's choice to accept or reject it.   

 

//therefore  it is clear that KSK categorise Mars-dosha and stated his opinion only for those astrologers but not to his followers : //

It is your interpretion. He starts with " let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion " and at then end of the article he offers his opinion that " It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the correct match. "

 

Now if we say that he referred astrologers to some other astrologers and not to his followers will be stretching it too far. He simply didn't have any alternate method of marriage matching and hence he draw that conclusion. Accept it or reject it is our choice, though it is the fact that KP readers do not offer any method for marriage matching. Lajmi ji vociferously advocate KPDP and I guess there are some other methods available as well if we see later KP literature. Need of KPDP tells absense of marriage matching method in KP.

 

What you are saying doesn't seem correct because of Shri KSK's nature of bluntly rejected the methods that doesn't work. He didn't reject it in the whole article. He is clearly recommending it to astrologers from above conclusion. Now assuming that these are some other astrologers and not KP followers, still he is recommending it to those astrologers and not rejecting it. I do not remember any other place in readers where Shri KSK has recommended some method to some astrologers and not to his followers. After all the readers are written for his followers and not for some other astrologers.  

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:02 PM, vgr pavan <vgr_pavan1 wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Punitji Pranam,I  still didnt understand what is the difference between mars dosha for compatibility and mars causing seperation.1.) Our Guruji gave preference to stars  but not to the mere placement in a sign ,(like in vedic astrology). Even in star placements he went further and divided into sub divisions. He proved that the minute subdivisions are responsible in drastic changes in the lifes of the people born in the same place or twins.

In this context how it will be logical to belive that KSK suggested us to verify mars dosha (which deals only  with placement in a sign). 2) KSK in many instances told that every one has to face the good or bad events in his life based upon the meritorious deeds done in his previous birth and no  chart has influence on others life. then how will be to think that mars placement in wifes chart will cause problems even though husbands chart indicating hormonious wedded life !

3) why guruji suggested us to judge separately about longevity etc... If mars dosha can cause widowhood to either.4) p.no. 52. Guruji stated as follows :One may ask, ' " why should they attach too much importance to the position of mars alone ? we had never heard anybody taking of moon`s dosha or any other planet`s dosha or sun`s dosha or any other  planets dosha . then does it mean that mars alone will do so much  harm to the couple to the couple which other planets cannot do " ?

the reply is that there are some people who unnecessarily exaggerate the evil results of mars. Most of the following points are not taken into consideration  he stated 20 points against kuja dosha:

then how can we say that ksk advocated Kuja dosha analysis for match making.the reason for the para by Guruji as shown by you  is that (as i feel)in the starting of the concept  p.no. 55 :

" when parents attempt  to fix the marriage of their sons and the daughters, the so called mars dosha , interpreted by astrologers according to their whims and fancies , confuses them due to varying opinion given by them. "  

  after few lines : " let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion " :thats why he divided mars-dosha into three groups and said the anology of blood group (because ksk tries to say that we has to match the chart having  kuja dosha with a chart having similar dosha but not the other two variants,)

therefore  it is clear that KSK categorise Mars-dosha and stated his opinion only for those astrologers but not to his followers : " It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the correct match "

As per the mails of tinwinji i understood that the topic  ended here, and later the last few paras were inserted So as to let the readers know how  K.P. followers look at these " doshas " by taking only the sub-level significations and not the mere placement of mars in different signs.

hope i am clear.i am not critising any one this iis what i understood about this concept.Guruji bless us all. Peace and Prosperity to All !!VGR

--- On Mon, 7/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:

 

Punit Pandey <punitpRe: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

Monday, 7 December, 2009, 12:50 AM

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Pavan ji,

 

It seem you are also mixing up two things. The Mars dosha section talks about two points -

1. Mars dosha for marriage matching

2. Mars dosha for predicting " difference of opinion, disagreement, dispute "

 

The section that has been appended later on in 1971 edition (starting from - To cause different of opinion ....) is for using Mars dosha for predicting difference of opinion, disagreement, disputes etc. Shri KSK himself clearly mentioned that any planet can do that. The study also proved the same point which Shri KSK has said. If you read my earlier email, I appreciated study for proving this point.

 

Though my point is that study didn't touch Mars dosha in marriage matching. Shri KSK said -

" It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh and  consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise on the correct match. "

 

It is clearly Shri KSK's opinion for using Mars dosha in " marriage matching " and not predicting on individual's horoscope. Point 1 (Mars dosha in marriage matching) was suggested by Shri KSK but not touched by study. My reason for writing the email was that people should not confuse that the study rejected both - mars dosha in prediction and mars dosha in marriage matching. The truth is that the study touched only mars dosha in prediction on individual's chart.

 

Generally Shri KSK was very truthful and blunt in calling a spade a spade. If he found that something is not working, he bluntly said that. Though when he says something to " weigh and consider various points of Mars Dosha " , we should listen him till the time some study proves otherwise. We will have to wait for a study that checks bride and groom's chart simultaneously and conclude something. I hope now you got my point.

 

I do not have 1966 edition with me. Tw ji said that upto " It is, therefore, ... " is reprint of earlier edition of 1966. Which means " It is, therefore, ... " was the actual conclusion by Shri KSK and I do not think that there should be any doubt on it. He starts with that I'll tell you my opinion and finally he offers this opinion to " weigh and consider various points of Mars Dosha " .

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

 

 

On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 11:27 PM, vgr pavan <vgr_pavan1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Punitji pranam,Pardon for interfering ....the qoute in reader 4 is

" To cause difference of opinion, disagreement, dispute, divorce etc. among the couple it is not left

to Mars alone, any planet can cause such undesirable effect provided

they happen to be deposited in such a position, that the sublord ofthe planet is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 or the sublord is

deposited in a constellation, the lord of which is the significatorof 6 or 10 or 12 " .Guruji , also stressed that " any planet can cause " such " undesirable effect , So he is telling

that we need not give preference to " Mars " alone , any planet can cause such results.   Again in the next  para " If the sub lord is mars or if it is in the constellation of mars , and if is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 , there will be separation. If it is saturn , silence and remain dumb-stick and strike. thus we have to predict. "

here also he said " separation " will be caused by mars  only when he is sublord or sub tenanted star lord and significator for 6,10,12.  but not with mere placement of mars in various signs from asc, moon, venus.

 [in P.no. 194 under the head " Divorce " " there is no mars dosha in this chart because it is in a movable sign , it is debilitated ; conjoined with mercury . Yet look at the fate . thus taking the position of mars and offering predictions which appear more like a curse is not correct . but take the planets situated in the  star or sub of mars in 1,2,4,8,12 ,. then , that planet tenanted in such a mars star will offer undesirable and disagreeable results.]   

point no. 3    " Shri KSK clearly mentioned it for compatibility matching " i think you are pointing the para above the para given by me, it reads as follows:

" It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the correct match " :

in the starting of this explanation on mars dosha P.no.55  KSK mentioned that  : " Let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion. "

So i think that upto the above para (p.no. 69 ) is what Gurujis explanation about various rules and the later paragraphs are his " final " opinion.(which are last paras of the topic) .

point no.4 guruji explained what vedic astrological rules for " Mars Dosha " are . but not instructed us to follow the same. These are my opinions .......

Peace and Prosperity to All !!VGR --- On Sun, 6/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

 

@gro ups.com

 

 

Sunday, 6 December, 2009, 9:40 PM

 

 

 

Dear Tw ji,

 

1. Please tell clearly whether you are saying that 1966 is more authentic or 1971. I do not understand the reason for initial 6 points.

2. Even in 1971 edition, when we say that " .... it can not be left to Mars alone " , it clearly means that Mars has impact, but it is not the " only " reason. Shri KSK were very clear about the impact of Mars dosha and that is the rason instead of rejecting it (which he has done quite often in readers for some other theories like Ashtakvarga) , he said that this is not the reason " alone. "

3. Regarding point 7, the question is not whether everything is pre-destined or not. The question is whether it is correct to check Mars dosha on indiviaul's chart where Shri KSK clearly mentioned it for compatibility matching. Any conclusion drawn without considered both the partner's horoscope seems incomplete to me and against what Shri KSK has mentioned about it.

4. You also didn't answer my question, whether Moon and Venus were considered or not, apart from Ascendant, in the study? We must remember that Shri KSK clearly mentioned about inclusion of Moon and Venus with Ascendant while judging Mars dosha.

5. What ideas you are finding speculative? I am just quoting what Shri KSK has said and what proof you need more than what Shri KSK has said himself.

 

My objections and questions doesn't mean that I am try to belittle the study. The study is useful and establish that Mars dosha has limited or no value when it comes to predicting disagreement, dispute, and divorce etc. in marriage. It is a good and useful finding. Though the study doesn't tell anything about Mars dosha compatibility and we should be very clear about it. Most of the problems are said when Mars dosha doesn't match in bride and groom's chart and this is the utility of this theory in Hindu astrology (and Indian families). Also, in future study must be extended to include Moon and Venus, so that it can test the real definition of Mars dosha and not just an incomplete definition of Mars dosha. Till the time the scope of study is clear, people may confuse and think that Mars dosha is match making doesn't exist which is actually not convered in the study.

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 8:55 PM, TW <tw853 > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Friends,

 

1. Mars dosha has been written in the KP Reader IV (Marriage, Married Life & Children) pages 51-69 (any Edition of reprinting). 2. Page 52, second and third parasOne may ask, " Why should they attach so much importance to the position of Mars alone? .......

The reply is that there are some people who unnessarily exaggerate the evil results of Mars.....3. Page 55, third paraLet me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion.

4. Page 69 fourth para It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise on the correct match.   

5. Up to the above para is reprinted from the early writtings in the Krishnamurti Padhdhati Vol II, Sagar publications, 1966.6. Page 69 fourth to sixth paras are added in the mentioned KP Reader IV, first published in May 1971; fourth para is as given under:

To cause difference of opinion,disagreemen t, dispute, divorce etc. among the couple it is not left to Mars alone, any planet can cause such undesirable effect provided they happen to be deposited in such a position, that the sublord of the planet is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 or the sublord is deposited in a constellation, the lord of which is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12. 

 

7. In KP, marriage matching, like education, occupation,death, is supposed to be predestined. 8. The speculative ideas would be sound, if and only if supported by a research study of sufficient numbers of charts other than here say experience or opinion.

 

Thanks and regards,

TW

 

@gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:>

 

 

 

 

 

> Dear Tw ji,> > I personally feel that the study missed few very basic but important points> and I would like to mention the same -> > 1. Problems due to Mars Dosha, tradionally as well as narrated by Shri KSK (

> http://logy. astrosage. com/mars- dosha), occurs only when the husband> and wife do not have same level of dosha. The problem exists only if a

> person having Mars dosha marries to the person who doesn't have Mars dosha> (even if we ignore level of dosha). The study seems to consider> only individual's chart and not two charts together. If it is studying

> only individual's chart, the study doesn't have much meaning. A study needs> to see Mars dosha in two situation and compare - a) mars dosha person> marriying to mars dosha person, b) mars dosha person not marring to Mars

> dosha person. Till the time we compare this two situation, how come we> conclude whether Mars Dosha works or not.> > 2. Traditonally as well as according to Shri KSK, Mars dosha should be> checked from Ascendant, Moon and Venus. It seems that study is considering

> only Ascedant and ignoring Moon and Venus. Again, if we do not follow the> definition properly, the conclusion reached can not be called correct.> > Here is the conclusion from your article -

> " It is to follow the KP rules only in considering longevity, matching,> separation, divorce, multi-marriage, happy or unhappy married life etc.> without mixing up with the traditional Manglik-to- Manglik matching rule and

> explain the public not to worry about Mars Dosha as suggested by Shri K.> Hariharan. " > > Here again it seems that we are mixing up two things. KP does NOT provide> any tool for chart matching and Mars dosha is a tool for matching and not

> for prediction. KP clearly gives the rule for longevity etc., but doesn't> tell much about matching two charts. There is no doubt that KP is dependent> on traditional methods of horoscope matching as far as KP readers are

> concerned. This is the reason Koota as well as Mars dosha found place in KP.> In my opinion, the study is about Mars dosha as a predictive tool (which is> not discussed by Shri KSK) and NOT Mars dosha as a matching tool (which is

> discussed by Shri KSK).> > Thanks & Regards,> > Punit Pandey> >

> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:51 PM, TW tw853 wrote:> > >> >> > Dear Friends,> > What has been found is in the File section under:> > MARS DOSHA IN KP.doc

> > Regards,> > TW> >> >> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>, Punit

> > Pandey punitp@ wrote:> > >> > > Dear Friends,> > >> > > Here is what is found in third reader -> > >> > > http://logy. astrosage. com/mars- dosha

> > >> > > Thanks & Regards,> > >> > > Punit Pandey> > >> > >> > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Ramani kadavasalramani@ wrote:

> > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Shri Bansalj,> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Any kind of Mars Dosha including the Mars in 4th fron Lagna or Moon or

> > > > Venus gets cancelled when Mars is aspected by Saturn.> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Truly yours,> > > >> > > >

> > > >> > > > K.S.V.Ramani> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > ** @gro ups.com <%40. com>[

> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>] *On

> > > > Behalf Of *pankaj bansal> > > > *Sent:* 04 December 2009 22:50> > > >> > > > *To:* @gro ups.com <%40. com>

> > > > *Subject:* Re: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the> > years...> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >

> > > > Namaste Lajmiji,> > > >> > > > If Mars is placed In 4th house from> > > > Lagna & Venus and Placed in POORVASHADA Nakshatra(Venus) .Then there is No

> > So> > > > called Mars dosha and the Native Can Marriage anybody who had or had> > not> > > > mars dosha in this Birth Chart?Eagerly waiting for your precious> > response.

> > > >> > > > Thanks> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > ** Yogesh Lajmi yogeshlajmi@

> > > >> > > > *To:* @gro ups.com <%40. com>

 

 

 

 

> > > > *Cc:* Punit Pandey punitp@> > > > *Sent:* Fri, 4 December, 2009 8:05:18 PM> >> > > > *Subject:* MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Members,> > > >> > > > Not withstanding what has been averred by some " K.P.> > > > research scholars " ,

> > > >> > > > and whose research has been qestioned already in these columns by many> > KP> > > > followers,> > > >> > > > *and also,*my own experience about Mars Dosha,over the years,and after

> > > > analysing the charts of many a married couples,for marital> > > > problems,especially ,after marriage,I agree 100% with the observation> > in> > > > K.P. books that *Mars posited in Sun's star,or own star,and occuping

> > > > houses I,II,IV,VII, VIII & XII** **alone causes Mars Dosha**...*> > > >> > > > I invite the opinion of all members...on this very> > > > controversial matter,and I must add here that almost ALL of my clients

> > who> > > > come to consult me,strongly believe about the existence of Mars> > Dosha...so> > > > much so that they attribute almost every domestic problem to the> > existence

> > > > of Mars Dosha,and keep asking for * " remedies " .. .* !> > > >> > > > Which I patiently have to explain in detail...based> > > > on their own experience in the practise of the K.P. System...

> > > >> > > > This is just to illustrate how deeply the ill-effects> > > > of Mars are embedded in the minds of people,at large...> > > >> > > > Am looking forward to comments from discerning

> > > > members...> > > >> > > > With kind regards,> > > >> > > > Yogesh Lajmi.> > > >> > > > * *> > > >

> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > Win 1 of 4 Sony home entertainment packs thanks to 7. Enter now<> > http://us.lrd. /_ylc=X3oDMTJxN2x 2ZmNpBF9zAzIwMjM 2MTY2MTMEdG1fZG1 lY2gDVGV4dCBMaW5 rBHRtX2xuawNVMTE wMzk3NwR0bV9uZXQ DWWFob28hBHRtX3B vcwN0YWdsaW5lBHR tX3BwdHkDYXVueg- -/SIG=14600t3ni/ **http%3A/ au.rd.. com/mail/ tagline/sony/ *http%3A/ au.docs.. com/homepageset/ %3Fp1=other% 26p2=au%26p3= mailtagline > > >> > > > .> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage<

> > http://in.rd. / tagline_yyi_ 1/*http:/ in.. com/>> > > > .> > > >

> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

 

 

 

 

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Thanks Punit Ji for your comments and your take on the subject.

 

I was also wondering how come some people live together for years, have children without going through the ceremony called wedding. That means they are not married; but they live together and have children.

 

What could be the KP significators for this type of life? Does the concept of family come in only after a person gets married? In the above example, for the children there is a mother and a father. But father and mother are not married. Very funny but there should be some significators/indicators for this type of situation.

 

Kindly enlighten me with your thoughts.

 

Regards

Gopal--- On Tue, 12/8/09, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:

Punit Pandey <punitpRe: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years... Date: Tuesday, December 8, 2009, 8:59 PM

 

Dear Gopal ji,

 

The is a tricky question you have asked. Discussion on matching horoscope definitely seems to contradict teachings of KP.

 

The uniqueness of horoscope is not limited to KP, but it is also unique in traditional. For example, a shastiamsa changes much faster than a sub.

 

In KP, horoscope is not only unique but also defined. Which means that KP believe in the concept that all small or big events in one's life are defined. Everything is destined and nothing can be changed by any mean like japa, mantra or any other form of remedies. Whether knowing future or matching horoscope doesn't make any difference in one's life. This is all done "just" for the peace of the mind.

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 7:16 PM, <subragops3 > wrote:

 

 

 

Dear Members,I have a basic question. We understand from KP that every horoscope is UNIQUE. Then why do we try to match two horoscopes which are unique in nature? Here the matching can be read as finding compatibilty between two horoscopes. Compatible on certain aspects. Why do we need to do this? Is it not an exercise in futility?.RegardsGopal Sent from my BlackBerry®powered by Sinyal Kuat INDOSAT

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>

Tue, 8 Dec 2009 17:29:10 +0530

 

 

 

<@gro ups.com>

Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

 

Dear Pavan ji,

 

// I still didnt understand what is the difference between mars dosha for compatibility and mars causing seperation. //

As you know marriage matching is used to decide upon the horoscope of bride or groom. How Mars dosha is used tradionally? Is it used on single horoscope?

 

Marriage matching is done on two charts. It is not about making some prediction for individual but composite study of impact of two horoscopes on each other. KP doesn't have any method for marriage matching in readers and hence we can see development of KPDP later.

 

//1.) Our Guruji gave preference to stars but not to the mere placement in a sign ,(like in vedic astrology). Even in star placements he went further and divided into sub divisions. He proved that the minute subdivisions are responsible in drastic changes in the lifes of the people born in the same place or twins.In this context how it will be logical to belive that KSK suggested us to verify mars dosha (which deals only with placement in a sign). //

Shri KSK also talked about mere placement of Saturn can cause Punarphoo (http://logy. astrosage. com/punarphoo). KP readers are full of such examples.

 

I agree it doesn't gel well with KP and I have written a seperate email about it. But it was Shri KSK's choice to include this article. Probably he found something important and that is the reason we find it in readers. His choice. Contradictions are nothing new in KP readers.

 

//3) why guruji suggested us to judge separately about longevity etc... If mars dosha can cause widowhood to either.//

You missed the point that the appended paragraphs were not conclusion. Please see my discussion with Tw ji and you will find that the conclusion is the paragraph where Shri KSK sugges weighing Mars Dosha in both the chart.

 

The appended line, as those apply on individual chart, doesn't say anything about Mars dosha in marriage matching. If you will read tradional astrology books, you will also find application of Mars dosha in individual's horoscope and it is rejected by Shri KSK. The same is also proven by the study.

 

//then how can we say that ksk advocated Kuja dosha analysis for match making.//

Shri KSK neither rejected nor advocated Mars dosha because he didn't have any alternate for marriage matching at that time. He simply shared his opinion and left it up to future development. Mars dosha is not alone there are many cases that he left untouched for future.

 

Now Mars dosha exists in Astro Secrets (as also shared by Lajmi ji) and KPDP. Again it is individual's choice to accept or reject it.

 

//therefore it is clear that KSK categorise Mars-dosha and stated his opinion only for those astrologers but not to his followers : //

It is your interpretion. He starts with "let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion" and at then end of the article he offers his opinion that "It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the correct match."

 

Now if we say that he referred astrologers to some other astrologers and not to his followers will be stretching it too far. He simply didn't have any alternate method of marriage matching and hence he draw that conclusion. Accept it or reject it is our choice, though it is the fact that KP readers do not offer any method for marriage matching. Lajmi ji vociferously advocate KPDP and I guess there are some other methods available as well if we see later KP literature. Need of KPDP tells absense of marriage matching method in KP.

 

What you are saying doesn't seem correct because of Shri KSK's nature of bluntly rejected the methods that doesn't work. He didn't reject it in the whole article. He is clearly recommending it to astrologers from above conclusion. Now assuming that these are some other astrologers and not KP followers, still he is recommending it to those astrologers and not rejecting it. I do not remember any other place in readers where Shri KSK has recommended some method to some astrologers and not to his followers. After all the readers are written for his followers and not for some other astrologers.

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:02 PM, vgr pavan <vgr_pavan1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Punitji Pranam,I still didnt understand what is the difference between mars dosha for compatibility and mars causing seperation.1.) Our Guruji gave preference to stars but not to the mere placement in a sign ,(like in vedic astrology). Even in star placements he went further and divided into sub divisions. He proved that the minute subdivisions are responsible in drastic changes in the lifes of the people born in the same place or twins.In this context how it will be logical to belive that KSK suggested us to verify mars dosha (which deals only with placement in a sign). 2) KSK in many instances told that every one has to face the good or bad events in his life based upon the meritorious deeds done in his previous birth and no chart has influence on others life. then how will be to think that mars placement in wifes chart will cause problems even though husbands chart indicating

hormonious wedded life !3) why guruji suggested us to judge separately about longevity etc... If mars dosha can cause widowhood to either.4) p.no. 52. Guruji stated as follows :One may ask, '"why should they attach too much importance to the position of mars alone ? we had never heard anybody taking of moon`s dosha or any other planet`s dosha or sun`s dosha or any other planets dosha . then does it mean that mars alone will do so much harm to the couple to the couple which other planets cannot do"?the reply is that there are some people who unnecessarily exaggerate the evil results of mars. Most of the following points are not taken into consideration he stated 20 points against kuja

dosha:then how can we say that ksk advocated Kuja dosha analysis for match making.the reason for the para by Guruji as shown by you is that (as i feel)in the starting of the concept p.no. 55 :"when parents attempt to fix the marriage of their sons and the daughters, the so called mars dosha , interpreted by astrologers according to their whims and fancies , confuses them due to varying opinion given by them." after few lines :"let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion ":thats why he divided mars-dosha into three groups and said the

anology of blood group (because ksk tries to say that we has to match the chart having kuja dosha with a chart having similar dosha but not the other two variants,) therefore it is clear that KSK categorise Mars-dosha and stated his opinion only for those astrologers but not to his followers : "It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the correct match"As per the mails of tinwinji i understood that the topic ended here, and later the last few paras were inserted So as to let the readers know how K.P. followers look at these "doshas" by taking only the sub-level significations and not the mere placement of mars in different signs.hope i am clear.i am not critising any one this iis what i understood about this concept.Guruji bless us all. Peace and Prosperity to All !!VGR

--- On Mon, 7/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...@gro ups.comMonday, 7 December, 2009, 12:50 AM

 

 

 

 

Dear Pavan ji,

 

It seem you are also mixing up two things. The Mars dosha section talks about two points -

1. Mars dosha for marriage matching

2. Mars dosha for predicting "difference of opinion, disagreement, dispute"

 

The section that has been appended later on in 1971 edition (starting from - To cause different of opinion ....) is for using Mars dosha for predicting difference of opinion, disagreement, disputes etc. Shri KSK himself clearly mentioned that any planet can do that. The study also proved the same point which Shri KSK has said. If you read my earlier email, I appreciated study for proving this point.

 

Though my point is that study didn't touch Mars dosha in marriage matching. Shri KSK said -

"It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise on the correct match."

 

It is clearly Shri KSK's opinion for using Mars dosha in "marriage matching" and not predicting on individual's horoscope. Point 1 (Mars dosha in marriage matching) was suggested by Shri KSK but not touched by study. My reason for writing the email was that people should not confuse that the study rejected both - mars dosha in prediction and mars dosha in marriage matching. The truth is that the study touched only mars dosha in prediction on individual's chart.

 

Generally Shri KSK was very truthful and blunt in calling a spade a spade. If he found that something is not working, he bluntly said that. Though when he says something to "weigh and consider various points of Mars Dosha", we should listen him till the time some study proves otherwise. We will have to wait for a study that checks bride and groom's chart simultaneously and conclude something. I hope now you got my point.

 

I do not have 1966 edition with me. Tw ji said that upto "It is, therefore, ..." is reprint of earlier edition of 1966. Which means "It is, therefore, ..." was the actual conclusion by Shri KSK and I do not think that there should be any doubt on it. He starts with that I'll tell you my opinion and finally he offers this opinion to "weigh and consider various points of Mars Dosha".

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

 

 

On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 11:27 PM, vgr pavan <vgr_pavan1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Punitji pranam,Pardon for interfering ....the qoute in reader 4 is

"To cause difference of opinion, disagreement, dispute, divorce etc. among the couple it is not leftto Mars alone, any planet can cause such undesirable effect providedthey happen to be deposited in such a position, that the sublord ofthe planet is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 or the sublord isdeposited in a constellation, the lord of which is the significatorof 6 or 10 or 12".Guruji , also stressed that "any planet can cause

"such" undesirable effect , So he is telling that we need not give preference to "Mars" alone , any planet can cause such results. Again in the next para" If the sub lord is mars or if it is in the constellation of mars , and if is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 , there will be separation. If it is saturn , silence and remain dumb-stick and strike. thus we have to predict." here also he said "separation" will be caused by mars only when he is sublord or sub tenanted star lord and significator for 6,10,12. but not with mere placement of mars in various signs from asc, moon, venus. [in P.no. 194 under the head "Divorce""there is no mars dosha in this chart because it is in a movable sign , it is debilitated ; conjoined with mercury . Yet look at the fate . thus taking the position of

mars and offering predictions which appear more like a curse is not correct . but take the planets situated in the star or sub of mars in 1,2,4,8,12 ,. then , that planet tenanted in such a mars star will offer undesirable and disagreeable results.] point no. 3 "Shri KSK clearly mentioned it for compatibility matching"i think you are pointing the para above the para given by me, it reads as follows: "It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the correct match": in the starting of this explanation on mars dosha P.no.55 KSK mentioned that : "Let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion. " So i think that upto the above para (p.no. 69 ) is what Gurujis explanation about various rules and the later paragraphs are his "final" opinion.(which are last paras of the topic) .point no.4 guruji explained what vedic astrological rules for "Mars Dosha " are . but not instructed us to follow the same. These are my opinions .......Peace and Prosperity to All !!VGR --- On Sun, 6/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

@gro ups.com

 

 

Sunday, 6 December, 2009, 9:40 PM

 

 

Dear Tw ji,

 

1. Please tell clearly whether you are saying that 1966 is more authentic or 1971. I do not understand the reason for initial 6 points.

2. Even in 1971 edition, when we say that ".... it can not be left to Mars alone", it clearly means that Mars has impact, but it is not the "only" reason. Shri KSK were very clear about the impact of Mars dosha and that is the rason instead of rejecting it (which he has done quite often in readers for some other theories like Ashtakvarga) , he said that this is not the reason "alone."

3. Regarding point 7, the question is not whether everything is pre-destined or not. The question is whether it is correct to check Mars dosha on indiviaul's chart where Shri KSK clearly mentioned it for compatibility matching. Any conclusion drawn without considered both the partner's horoscope seems incomplete to me and against what Shri KSK has mentioned about it.

4. You also didn't answer my question, whether Moon and Venus were considered or not, apart from Ascendant, in the study? We must remember that Shri KSK clearly mentioned about inclusion of Moon and Venus with Ascendant while judging Mars dosha.

5. What ideas you are finding speculative? I am just quoting what Shri KSK has said and what proof you need more than what Shri KSK has said himself.

 

My objections and questions doesn't mean that I am try to belittle the study. The study is useful and establish that Mars dosha has limited or no value when it comes to predicting disagreement, dispute, and divorce etc. in marriage. It is a good and useful finding. Though the study doesn't tell anything about Mars dosha compatibility and we should be very clear about it. Most of the problems are said when Mars dosha doesn't match in bride and groom's chart and this is the utility of this theory in Hindu astrology (and Indian families). Also, in future study must be extended to include Moon and Venus, so that it can test the real definition of Mars dosha and not just an incomplete definition of Mars dosha. Till the time the scope of study is clear, people may confuse and think that Mars dosha is match making doesn't exist which is actually not convered in the study.

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 8:55 PM, TW <tw853 > wrote:

 

 

 

 

Dear Friends,

 

1. Mars dosha has been written in the KP Reader IV (Marriage, Married Life & Children) pages 51-69 (any Edition of reprinting). 2. Page 52, second and third parasOne may ask, "Why should they attach so much importance to the position of Mars alone? .......The reply is that there are some people who unnessarily exaggerate the evil results of Mars.....3. Page 55, third paraLet me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion.4. Page 69 fourth para It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise on the correct match. 5. Up to the above para is reprinted from the early writtings in the Krishnamurti Padhdhati Vol II, Sagar publications, 1966.6. Page 69 fourth to sixth paras are added in the mentioned KP Reader IV, first published in May 1971; fourth para is as given under:To cause difference of opinion,disagreemen t, dispute, divorce etc. among the couple it is not left to Mars alone, any planet can cause such undesirable effect provided they happen to be deposited in such a position, that the sublord of the planet is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 or the sublord is deposited in a constellation, the lord of which is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12.

7. In KP, marriage matching, like education, occupation,death, is supposed to be predestined. 8. The speculative ideas would be sound, if and only if supported by a research study of sufficient numbers of charts other than here say experience or opinion.

 

Thanks and regards,

TW

 

@gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:>

 

 

 

 

 

> Dear Tw ji,> > I personally feel that the study missed few very basic but important points> and I would like to mention the same -> > 1. Problems due to Mars Dosha, tradionally as well as narrated by Shri KSK (> http://logy. astrosage. com/mars- dosha), occurs only when the husband> and wife do not have same level of dosha. The problem exists only if a> person having Mars dosha marries to the person who doesn't have Mars dosha> (even if we ignore level of dosha). The study seems to consider> only individual's chart and not two charts together. If it is studying> only individual's chart, the study doesn't have much meaning. A study needs> to see Mars dosha in two situation and compare - a) mars dosha person> marriying to mars dosha person, b) mars dosha person not

marring to Mars> dosha person. Till the time we compare this two situation, how come we> conclude whether Mars Dosha works or not.> > 2. Traditonally as well as according to Shri KSK, Mars dosha should be> checked from Ascendant, Moon and Venus. It seems that study is considering> only Ascedant and ignoring Moon and Venus. Again, if we do not follow the> definition properly, the conclusion reached can not be called correct.> > Here is the conclusion from your article -> "It is to follow the KP rules only in considering longevity, matching,> separation, divorce, multi-marriage, happy or unhappy married life etc.> without mixing up with the traditional Manglik-to- Manglik matching rule and> explain the public not to worry about Mars Dosha as suggested by Shri K.> Hariharan."> > Here again it seems that we are mixing up two things. KP does NOT

provide> any tool for chart matching and Mars dosha is a tool for matching and not> for prediction. KP clearly gives the rule for longevity etc., but doesn't> tell much about matching two charts. There is no doubt that KP is dependent> on traditional methods of horoscope matching as far as KP readers are> concerned. This is the reason Koota as well as Mars dosha found place in KP.> In my opinion, the study is about Mars dosha as a predictive tool (which is> not discussed by Shri KSK) and NOT Mars dosha as a matching tool (which is> discussed by Shri KSK).> > Thanks & Regards,> > Punit Pandey> >

> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:51 PM, TW tw853 wrote:> > >> >> > Dear Friends,> > What has been found is in the File section under:> > MARS DOSHA IN KP.doc> > Regards,> > TW> >> >> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>, Punit

> > Pandey punitp@ wrote:> > >> > > Dear Friends,> > >> > > Here is what is found in third reader -> > >> > > http://logy. astrosage. com/mars- dosha> > >> > > Thanks & Regards,> > >> > > Punit Pandey> > >> > >> > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Ramani kadavasalramani@ wrote:> > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Shri Bansalj,> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Any kind of Mars Dosha including the Mars in 4th fron Lagna or Moon or> > > > Venus gets cancelled when Mars is aspected by Saturn.> > > >> > > >> > >

>> > > > Truly yours,> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > K.S.V.Ramani> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > ** @gro ups.com <%40. com>[> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>] *On

> > > > Behalf Of *pankaj bansal> > > > *Sent:* 04 December 2009 22:50> > > >> > > > *To:* @gro ups.com <%40. com>

> > > > *Subject:* Re: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the> > years...> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Namaste Lajmiji,> > > >> > > > If Mars is placed In 4th house from> > > > Lagna & Venus and Placed in POORVASHADA Nakshatra(Venus) .Then there is No> > So> > > > called Mars dosha and the Native Can Marriage anybody who had or had> > not> > > > mars dosha in this Birth Chart?Eagerly waiting for your precious> > response.> > > >> > > > Thanks> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > ** Yogesh Lajmi yogeshlajmi@> > > >>

> > > *To:* @gro ups.com <%40. com>

 

 

 

 

> > > > *Cc:* Punit Pandey punitp@> > > > *Sent:* Fri, 4 December, 2009 8:05:18 PM> >> > > > *Subject:* MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Members,> > > >> > > > Not withstanding what has been averred by some "K.P.> > > > research scholars",> > > >> > > > and whose research has been qestioned already in these columns by many> > KP> > > > followers,> > > >> > > > *and also,*my own experience about Mars Dosha,over the years,and after> > > > analysing the charts of many a married couples,for marital> > > > problems,especially ,after marriage,I agree 100% with the observation> > in> > >

> K.P. books that *Mars posited in Sun's star,or own star,and occuping> > > > houses I,II,IV,VII, VIII & XII** **alone causes Mars Dosha**...*> > > >> > > > I invite the opinion of all members...on this very> > > > controversial matter,and I must add here that almost ALL of my clients> > who> > > > come to consult me,strongly believe about the existence of Mars> > Dosha...so> > > > much so that they attribute almost every domestic problem to the> > existence> > > > of Mars Dosha,and keep asking for *"remedies".. .* !> > > >> > > > Which I patiently have to explain in detail...based> > > > on their own experience in the practise of the K.P. System...> > > >> > > > This is just to illustrate how deeply the ill-effects> >

> > of Mars are embedded in the minds of people,at large...> > > >> > > > Am looking forward to comments from discerning> > > > members...> > > >> > > > With kind regards,> > > >> > > > Yogesh Lajmi.> > > >> > > > * *> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > Win 1 of 4 Sony home entertainment packs thanks to 7. Enter now<> > http://us.lrd. /_ylc= X3oDMTJxN2x 2ZmNpBF9zAzIwMjM 2MTY2MTMEdG1fZG1 lY2gDVGV4dCBMaW5 rBHRtX2xuawNVMTE wMzk3NwR0bV9uZXQ DWWFob28hBHRtX3B vcwN0YWdsaW5lBHR tX3BwdHkDYXVueg- -/SIG=14600t3ni/ **http%3A/ au.rd.. com/mail/ tagline/sony/ *http%3A/ au.docs.. com/homepageset/ %3Fp1=other% 26p2=au%26p3= mailtagline > > >> > > > .> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage<> > http://in.rd. / tagline_yyi_ 1/*http:/ in.. com/>> > > > .> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

 

 

 

 

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Dear Gopal,

Have u read my explanation,as per K.P., regarding as to why our ancients preferred matching of horoscopes,view matrimony...and Mars Dosha etc... ??

Pl. let me know your response ?

Yogesh Lajmi...

 

 

 

 

Gopalakrishnan Subra Iyer <subragops3 Sent: Wed, 9 December, 2009 9:24:26 AMRe: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

 

 

 

 

 

Thanks Punit Ji for your comments and your take on the subject.

 

I was also wondering how come some people live together for years, have children without going through the ceremony called wedding. That means they are not married; but they live together and have children.

 

What could be the KP significators for this type of life? Does the concept of family come in only after a person gets married? In the above example, for the children there is a mother and a father. But father and mother are not married. Very funny but there should be some significators/ indicators for this type of situation.

 

Kindly enlighten me with your thoughts.

 

Regards

Gopal--- On Tue, 12/8/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...@gro ups.comTuesday, December 8, 2009, 8:59 PM

 

Dear Gopal ji,

 

The is a tricky question you have asked. Discussion on matching horoscope definitely seems to contradict teachings of KP.

 

The uniqueness of horoscope is not limited to KP, but it is also unique in traditional. For example, a shastiamsa changes much faster than a sub.

 

In KP, horoscope is not only unique but also defined. Which means that KP believe in the concept that all small or big events in one's life are defined. Everything is destined and nothing can be changed by any mean like japa, mantra or any other form of remedies. Whether knowing future or matching horoscope doesn't make any difference in one's life. This is all done "just" for the peace of the mind.

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 7:16 PM, <subragops3 > wrote:

 

 

 

Dear Members,I have a basic question. We understand from KP that every horoscope is UNIQUE. Then why do we try to match two horoscopes which are unique in nature? Here the matching can be read as finding compatibilty between two horoscopes. Compatible on certain aspects. Why do we need to do this? Is it not an exercise in futility?.RegardsGopal Sent from my BlackBerry®powered by Sinyal Kuat INDOSAT

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>

Tue, 8 Dec 2009 17:29:10 +0530

 

 

 

<@gro ups.com>

Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

 

Dear Pavan ji,

 

// I still didnt understand what is the difference between mars dosha for compatibility and mars causing seperation. //

As you know marriage matching is used to decide upon the horoscope of bride or groom. How Mars dosha is used tradionally? Is it used on single horoscope?

 

Marriage matching is done on two charts. It is not about making some prediction for individual but composite study of impact of two horoscopes on each other. KP doesn't have any method for marriage matching in readers and hence we can see development of KPDP later.

 

//1.) Our Guruji gave preference to stars but not to the mere placement in a sign ,(like in vedic astrology). Even in star placements he went further and divided into sub divisions. He proved that the minute subdivisions are responsible in drastic changes in the lifes of the people born in the same place or twins.In this context how it will be logical to belive that KSK suggested us to verify mars dosha (which deals only with placement in a sign). //

Shri KSK also talked about mere placement of Saturn can cause Punarphoo (http://logy. astrosage. com/punarphoo). KP readers are full of such examples.

 

I agree it doesn't gel well with KP and I have written a seperate email about it. But it was Shri KSK's choice to include this article. Probably he found something important and that is the reason we find it in readers. His choice. Contradictions are nothing new in KP readers.

 

//3) why guruji suggested us to judge separately about longevity etc... If mars dosha can cause widowhood to either.//

You missed the point that the appended paragraphs were not conclusion. Please see my discussion with Tw ji and you will find that the conclusion is the paragraph where Shri KSK sugges weighing Mars Dosha in both the chart.

 

The appended line, as those apply on individual chart, doesn't say anything about Mars dosha in marriage matching. If you will read tradional astrology books, you will also find application of Mars dosha in individual's horoscope and it is rejected by Shri KSK. The same is also proven by the study.

 

//then how can we say that ksk advocated Kuja dosha analysis for match making.//

Shri KSK neither rejected nor advocated Mars dosha because he didn't have any alternate for marriage matching at that time. He simply shared his opinion and left it up to future development. Mars dosha is not alone there are many cases that he left untouched for future.

 

Now Mars dosha exists in Astro Secrets (as also shared by Lajmi ji) and KPDP. Again it is individual's choice to accept or reject it.

 

//therefore it is clear that KSK categorise Mars-dosha and stated his opinion only for those astrologers but not to his followers : //

It is your interpretion. He starts with "let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion" and at then end of the article he offers his opinion that "It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the correct match."

 

Now if we say that he referred astrologers to some other astrologers and not to his followers will be stretching it too far. He simply didn't have any alternate method of marriage matching and hence he draw that conclusion. Accept it or reject it is our choice, though it is the fact that KP readers do not offer any method for marriage matching. Lajmi ji vociferously advocate KPDP and I guess there are some other methods available as well if we see later KP literature. Need of KPDP tells absense of marriage matching method in KP.

 

What you are saying doesn't seem correct because of Shri KSK's nature of bluntly rejected the methods that doesn't work. He didn't reject it in the whole article. He is clearly recommending it to astrologers from above conclusion. Now assuming that these are some other astrologers and not KP followers, still he is recommending it to those astrologers and not rejecting it. I do not remember any other place in readers where Shri KSK has recommended some method to some astrologers and not to his followers. After all the readers are written for his followers and not for some other astrologers.

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:02 PM, vgr pavan <vgr_pavan1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Punitji Pranam,I still didnt understand what is the difference between mars dosha for compatibility and mars causing seperation.1.) Our Guruji gave preference to stars but not to the mere placement in a sign ,(like in vedic astrology). Even in star placements he went further and divided into sub divisions. He proved that the minute subdivisions are responsible in drastic changes in the lifes of the people born in the same place or twins.In this context how it will be logical to belive that KSK suggested us to verify mars dosha (which deals only with placement in a sign). 2) KSK in many instances told that every one has to face the good or bad events in his life based upon the meritorious deeds done in his previous birth and no chart has influence on others life. then how will be to think that mars placement in wifes chart will cause problems even though husbands chart indicating

hormonious wedded life !3) why guruji suggested us to judge separately about longevity etc... If mars dosha can cause widowhood to either.4) p.no. 52. Guruji stated as follows :One may ask, '"why should they attach too much importance to the position of mars alone ? we had never heard anybody taking of moon`s dosha or any other planet`s dosha or sun`s dosha or any other planets dosha . then does it mean that mars alone will do so much harm to the couple to the couple which other planets cannot do"?the reply is that there are some people who unnecessarily exaggerate the evil results of mars. Most of the following points are not taken into consideration he stated 20 points against kuja

dosha:then how can we say that ksk advocated Kuja dosha analysis for match making.the reason for the para by Guruji as shown by you is that (as i feel)in the starting of the concept p.no. 55 :"when parents attempt to fix the marriage of their sons and the daughters, the so called mars dosha , interpreted by astrologers according to their whims and fancies , confuses them due to varying opinion given by them." after few lines :"let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion ":thats why he divided mars-dosha into three groups and said the

anology of blood group (because ksk tries to say that we has to match the chart having kuja dosha with a chart having similar dosha but not the other two variants,) therefore it is clear that KSK categorise Mars-dosha and stated his opinion only for those astrologers but not to his followers : "It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the correct match"As per the mails of tinwinji i understood that the topic ended here, and later the last few paras were inserted So as to let the readers know how K.P. followers look at these "doshas" by taking only the sub-level significations and not the mere placement of mars in different signs.hope i am clear.i am not critising any one this iis what i understood about this concept.Guruji bless us all. Peace and Prosperity to All !!VGR

--- On Mon, 7/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...@gro ups.comMonday, 7 December, 2009, 12:50 AM

 

 

 

 

Dear Pavan ji,

 

It seem you are also mixing up two things. The Mars dosha section talks about two points -

1. Mars dosha for marriage matching

2. Mars dosha for predicting "difference of opinion, disagreement, dispute"

 

The section that has been appended later on in 1971 edition (starting from - To cause different of opinion ....) is for using Mars dosha for predicting difference of opinion, disagreement, disputes etc. Shri KSK himself clearly mentioned that any planet can do that. The study also proved the same point which Shri KSK has said. If you read my earlier email, I appreciated study for proving this point.

 

Though my point is that study didn't touch Mars dosha in marriage matching. Shri KSK said -

"It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise on the correct match."

 

It is clearly Shri KSK's opinion for using Mars dosha in "marriage matching" and not predicting on individual's horoscope. Point 1 (Mars dosha in marriage matching) was suggested by Shri KSK but not touched by study. My reason for writing the email was that people should not confuse that the study rejected both - mars dosha in prediction and mars dosha in marriage matching. The truth is that the study touched only mars dosha in prediction on individual's chart.

 

Generally Shri KSK was very truthful and blunt in calling a spade a spade. If he found that something is not working, he bluntly said that. Though when he says something to "weigh and consider various points of Mars Dosha", we should listen him till the time some study proves otherwise. We will have to wait for a study that checks bride and groom's chart simultaneously and conclude something. I hope now you got my point.

 

I do not have 1966 edition with me. Tw ji said that upto "It is, therefore, ..." is reprint of earlier edition of 1966. Which means "It is, therefore, ..." was the actual conclusion by Shri KSK and I do not think that there should be any doubt on it. He starts with that I'll tell you my opinion and finally he offers this opinion to "weigh and consider various points of Mars Dosha".

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

 

 

On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 11:27 PM, vgr pavan <vgr_pavan1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Punitji pranam,Pardon for interfering ....the qoute in reader 4 is

"To cause difference of opinion, disagreement, dispute, divorce etc. among the couple it is not leftto Mars alone, any planet can cause such undesirable effect providedthey happen to be deposited in such a position, that the sublord ofthe planet is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 or the sublord isdeposited in a constellation, the lord of which is the significatorof 6 or 10 or 12".Guruji , also stressed that "any planet can cause

"such" undesirable effect , So he is telling that we need not give preference to "Mars" alone , any planet can cause such results. Again in the next para" If the sub lord is mars or if it is in the constellation of mars , and if is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 , there will be separation. If it is saturn , silence and remain dumb-stick and strike. thus we have to predict." here also he said "separation" will be caused by mars only when he is sublord or sub tenanted star lord and significator for 6,10,12. but not with mere placement of mars in various signs from asc, moon, venus. [in P.no. 194 under the head "Divorce""there is no mars dosha in this chart because it is in a movable sign , it is debilitated ; conjoined with mercury . Yet look at the fate . thus taking the position of

mars and offering predictions which appear more like a curse is not correct . but take the planets situated in the star or sub of mars in 1,2,4,8,12 ,. then , that planet tenanted in such a mars star will offer undesirable and disagreeable results.] point no. 3 "Shri KSK clearly mentioned it for compatibility matching"i think you are pointing the para above the para given by me, it reads as follows: "It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the correct match": in the starting of this explanation on mars dosha P.no.55 KSK mentioned that : "Let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion. " So i think that upto the above para (p.no. 69 ) is what Gurujis explanation about various rules and the later paragraphs are his "final" opinion.(which are last paras of the topic) .point no.4 guruji explained what vedic astrological rules for "Mars Dosha " are . but not instructed us to follow the same. These are my opinions .......Peace and Prosperity to All !!VGR --- On Sun, 6/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

@gro ups.com

 

 

Sunday, 6 December, 2009, 9:40 PM

 

 

Dear Tw ji,

 

1. Please tell clearly whether you are saying that 1966 is more authentic or 1971. I do not understand the reason for initial 6 points.

2. Even in 1971 edition, when we say that ".... it can not be left to Mars alone", it clearly means that Mars has impact, but it is not the "only" reason. Shri KSK were very clear about the impact of Mars dosha and that is the rason instead of rejecting it (which he has done quite often in readers for some other theories like Ashtakvarga) , he said that this is not the reason "alone."

3. Regarding point 7, the question is not whether everything is pre-destined or not. The question is whether it is correct to check Mars dosha on indiviaul's chart where Shri KSK clearly mentioned it for compatibility matching. Any conclusion drawn without considered both the partner's horoscope seems incomplete to me and against what Shri KSK has mentioned about it.

4. You also didn't answer my question, whether Moon and Venus were considered or not, apart from Ascendant, in the study? We must remember that Shri KSK clearly mentioned about inclusion of Moon and Venus with Ascendant while judging Mars dosha.

5. What ideas you are finding speculative? I am just quoting what Shri KSK has said and what proof you need more than what Shri KSK has said himself.

 

My objections and questions doesn't mean that I am try to belittle the study. The study is useful and establish that Mars dosha has limited or no value when it comes to predicting disagreement, dispute, and divorce etc. in marriage. It is a good and useful finding. Though the study doesn't tell anything about Mars dosha compatibility and we should be very clear about it. Most of the problems are said when Mars dosha doesn't match in bride and groom's chart and this is the utility of this theory in Hindu astrology (and Indian families). Also, in future study must be extended to include Moon and Venus, so that it can test the real definition of Mars dosha and not just an incomplete definition of Mars dosha. Till the time the scope of study is clear, people may confuse and think that Mars dosha is match making doesn't exist which is actually not convered in the study.

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 8:55 PM, TW <tw853 > wrote:

 

 

 

 

Dear Friends,

 

1. Mars dosha has been written in the KP Reader IV (Marriage, Married Life & Children) pages 51-69 (any Edition of reprinting). 2. Page 52, second and third parasOne may ask, "Why should they attach so much importance to the position of Mars alone? .......The reply is that there are some people who unnessarily exaggerate the evil results of Mars.....3. Page 55, third paraLet me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion.4. Page 69 fourth para It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise on the correct match. 5. Up to the above para is reprinted from the early writtings in the Krishnamurti Padhdhati Vol II, Sagar publications, 1966.6. Page 69 fourth to sixth paras are added in the mentioned KP Reader IV, first published in May 1971; fourth para is as given under:To cause difference of opinion,disagreemen t, dispute, divorce etc. among the couple it is not left to Mars alone, any planet can cause such undesirable effect provided they happen to be deposited in such a position, that the sublord of the planet is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 or the sublord is deposited in a constellation, the lord of which is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12.

7. In KP, marriage matching, like education, occupation,death, is supposed to be predestined. 8. The speculative ideas would be sound, if and only if supported by a research study of sufficient numbers of charts other than here say experience or opinion.

 

Thanks and regards,

TW

 

@gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:>

 

 

 

 

 

> Dear Tw ji,> > I personally feel that the study missed few very basic but important points> and I would like to mention the same -> > 1. Problems due to Mars Dosha, tradionally as well as narrated by Shri KSK (> http://logy. astrosage. com/mars- dosha), occurs only when the husband> and wife do not have same level of dosha. The problem exists only if a> person having Mars dosha marries to the person who doesn't have Mars dosha> (even if we ignore level of dosha). The study seems to consider> only individual's chart and not two charts together. If it is studying> only individual's chart, the study doesn't have much meaning. A study needs> to see Mars dosha in two situation and compare - a) mars dosha person> marriying to mars dosha person, b) mars dosha person not

marring to Mars> dosha person. Till the time we compare this two situation, how come we> conclude whether Mars Dosha works or not.> > 2. Traditonally as well as according to Shri KSK, Mars dosha should be> checked from Ascendant, Moon and Venus. It seems that study is considering> only Ascedant and ignoring Moon and Venus. Again, if we do not follow the> definition properly, the conclusion reached can not be called correct.> > Here is the conclusion from your article -> "It is to follow the KP rules only in considering longevity, matching,> separation, divorce, multi-marriage, happy or unhappy married life etc.> without mixing up with the traditional Manglik-to- Manglik matching rule and> explain the public not to worry about Mars Dosha as suggested by Shri K.> Hariharan."> > Here again it seems that we are mixing up two things. KP does NOT

provide> any tool for chart matching and Mars dosha is a tool for matching and not> for prediction. KP clearly gives the rule for longevity etc., but doesn't> tell much about matching two charts. There is no doubt that KP is dependent> on traditional methods of horoscope matching as far as KP readers are> concerned. This is the reason Koota as well as Mars dosha found place in KP.> In my opinion, the study is about Mars dosha as a predictive tool (which is> not discussed by Shri KSK) and NOT Mars dosha as a matching tool (which is> discussed by Shri KSK).> > Thanks & Regards,> > Punit Pandey> >

> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:51 PM, TW tw853 wrote:> > >> >> > Dear Friends,> > What has been found is in the File section under:> > MARS DOSHA IN KP.doc> > Regards,> > TW> >> >> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>, Punit

> > Pandey punitp@ wrote:> > >> > > Dear Friends,> > >> > > Here is what is found in third reader -> > >> > > http://logy. astrosage. com/mars- dosha> > >> > > Thanks & Regards,> > >> > > Punit Pandey> > >> > >> > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Ramani kadavasalramani@ wrote:> > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Shri Bansalj,> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Any kind of Mars Dosha including the Mars in 4th fron Lagna or Moon or> > > > Venus gets cancelled when Mars is aspected by Saturn.> > > >> > > >> > >

>> > > > Truly yours,> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > K.S.V.Ramani> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > ** @gro ups.com <%40. com>[> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>] *On

> > > > Behalf Of *pankaj bansal> > > > *Sent:* 04 December 2009 22:50> > > >> > > > *To:* @gro ups.com <%40. com>

> > > > *Subject:* Re: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the> > years...> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Namaste Lajmiji,> > > >> > > > If Mars is placed In 4th house from> > > > Lagna & Venus and Placed in POORVASHADA Nakshatra(Venus) .Then there is No> > So> > > > called Mars dosha and the Native Can Marriage anybody who had or had> > not> > > > mars dosha in this Birth Chart?Eagerly waiting for your precious> > response.> > > >> > > > Thanks> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > ** Yogesh Lajmi yogeshlajmi@> > > >>

> > > *To:* @gro ups.com <%40. com>

 

 

 

 

> > > > *Cc:* Punit Pandey punitp@> > > > *Sent:* Fri, 4 December, 2009 8:05:18 PM> >> > > > *Subject:* MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Members,> > > >> > > > Not withstanding what has been averred by some "K.P.> > > > research scholars",> > > >> > > > and whose research has been qestioned already in these columns by many> > KP> > > > followers,> > > >> > > > *and also,*my own experience about Mars Dosha,over the years,and after> > > > analysing the charts of many a married couples,for marital> > > > problems,especially ,after marriage,I agree 100% with the observation> > in> > >

> K.P. books that *Mars posited in Sun's star,or own star,and occuping> > > > houses I,II,IV,VII, VIII & XII** **alone causes Mars Dosha**...*> > > >> > > > I invite the opinion of all members...on this very> > > > controversial matter,and I must add here that almost ALL of my clients> > who> > > > come to consult me,strongly believe about the existence of Mars> > Dosha...so> > > > much so that they attribute almost every domestic problem to the> > existence> > > > of Mars Dosha,and keep asking for *"remedies". . .* !> > > >> > > > Which I patiently have to explain in detail...based> > > > on their own experience in the practise of the K.P. System...> > > >> > > > This is just to illustrate how deeply the ill-effects>

> > > of Mars are embedded in the minds of people,at large...> > > >> > > > Am looking forward to comments from discerning> > > > members...> > > >> > > > With kind regards,> > > >> > > > Yogesh Lajmi.> > > >> > > > * *> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > Win 1 of 4 Sony home entertainment packs thanks to 7. Enter now<> > http://us.lrd. /_ylc= X3oDMTJxN2x 2ZmNpBF9zAzIwMjM 2MTY2MTMEdG1fZG1 lY2gDVGV4dCBMaW5 rBHRtX2xuawNVMTE wMzk3NwR0bV9uZXQ DWWFob28hBHRtX3B vcwN0YWdsaW5lBHR tX3BwdHkDYXVueg- -/SIG=14600t3ni/ **http%3A/ au.rd.. com/mail/ tagline/sony/ *http%3A/ au.docs.. com/homepageset/ %3Fp1=other% 26p2=au%26p3= mailtagline > > >> > > > .> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage<> > http://in.rd. / tagline_yyi_ 1/*http:/ in.. com/>> > > > .> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

 

 

 

 

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See what's on at the movies in your area. Find out now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Punitji Pranam,Shri KSK neither rejected nor advocated Mars dosha because he

didn't have any alternate for marriage matching at that time. He simply

shared his opinion and left it up to future development. Mars dosha is

not alone there are many cases that he left untouched for future.

are you saying that Guruji doesnt have any match making at his time for him thats why neither supported nor rejected Mars dosha,An author like Sri KSK who released an entire book on marriage & progeny ( giving highest preference than any set of events ie. money, profession etc..) and rejected all types of "poruthams" can not comment on mars dosha clearly and left it to his students (not mentioning about that) for further research !he clearly stated that one should not unnecessarily worry about kuja dosha what else will be the proof than this,.he clearly and straightly asked the points : 18. If there is no such dosha in both the horoscopes , is a happy and harmonious wedded life guaranteed for a long no.of years ?19. as the houses 2,7,11 indicate ones marriage as well as the state of married life , if these houses are occupied by benefics and if mars occupies an evil sign

, even then will there be any bad effect ?20. If the houses 2,7 and 11 are owned by malefics and occupied by malefics and there is no mars dosha , how can the partners lead a prosperous life ? what is your opinion on these questions, Does it mean that KSK didnt know answers for these queries and suggested Mars-dosha for match making.KSK never told that compatibility analysis for prosperous married life. he just asked us to see whether the native is blessed with prosperous married life or not, if he has not such luck .......which chart we shall select for him. KSK always said that see the "praptham"(possibility) not the "porutham"(compatibilty)which his students like M.C.khare, sivapadam etc mentioned in their articles.........Practically in how many divorced charts we find mars dosham ..........let us collect those charts and study and look for ourselves.I am

not Pointing any one , i want to learn more from this debate.....(frankly speaking your discussion lead to me read this topic again and again, thanks for that )Peace and Prosperity to All !!VGR--- On Tue, 8/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:Punit Pandey <punitpRe: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years... Date: Tuesday, 8 December, 2009, 6:42 PM

 

 

Dear Pavan ji,

 

According to him the Mars dosha, as it is judged traditionally, is not correct. He recommends us to consider those 20 points while judging Mars dosha. This is another differentiator of the article.

 

He is trying to answer the question which he asked himself. He also says that there are people who unnecessary exaggerate Mars dosha without considering 20 given points. In other words, Mars dosha should be judged keeping those 20 points in mind.

 

Does it not mean that he is recommending Mars dosha under some of his recommendations that he kept telling in the article?

 

It is not rejection, but a correction to traditional understating IMO.

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 6:16 PM, vgr pavan <vgr_pavan1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

punitji pranam,waiting for your reply on point 4 .regards Peace and Prosperity to All !!VGR

--- On Tue, 8/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...@gro ups.com

Tuesday, 8 December, 2009, 5:29 PM

 

 

 

 

Dear Pavan ji,

 

// I still didnt understand what is the difference between mars dosha for compatibility and mars causing seperation. //

As you know marriage matching is used to decide upon the horoscope of bride or groom. How Mars dosha is used tradionally? Is it used on single horoscope?

 

Marriage matching is done on two charts. It is not about making some prediction for individual but composite study of impact of two horoscopes on each other. KP doesn't have any method for marriage matching in readers and hence we can see development of KPDP later.

 

//1.) Our Guruji gave preference to stars but not to the mere placement in a sign ,(like in vedic astrology). Even in star placements he went further and divided into sub divisions. He proved that the minute subdivisions are responsible in drastic changes in the lifes of the people born in the same place or twins.

In this context how it will be logical to belive that KSK suggested us to verify mars dosha (which deals only with placement in a sign). //

Shri KSK also talked about mere placement of Saturn can cause Punarphoo (http://logy. astrosage. com/punarphoo). KP readers are full of such examples.

 

I agree it doesn't gel well with KP and I have written a seperate email about it. But it was Shri KSK's choice to include this article. Probably he found something important and that is the reason we find it in readers. His choice. Contradictions are nothing new in KP readers.

 

//3) why guruji suggested us to judge separately about longevity etc... If mars dosha can cause widowhood to either.//

You missed the point that the appended paragraphs were not conclusion. Please see my discussion with Tw ji and you will find that the conclusion is the paragraph where Shri KSK sugges weighing Mars Dosha in both the chart.

 

The appended line, as those apply on individual chart, doesn't say anything about Mars dosha in marriage matching. If you will read tradional astrology books, you will also find application of Mars dosha in individual's horoscope and it is rejected by Shri KSK. The same is also proven by the study.

 

//then how can we say that ksk advocated Kuja dosha analysis for match making.//

Shri KSK neither rejected nor advocated Mars dosha because he didn't have any alternate for marriage matching at that time. He simply shared his opinion and left it up to future development. Mars dosha is not alone there are many cases that he left untouched for future.

 

Now Mars dosha exists in Astro Secrets (as also shared by Lajmi ji) and KPDP. Again it is individual's choice to accept or reject it.

 

//therefore it is clear that KSK categorise Mars-dosha and stated his opinion only for those astrologers but not to his followers : //

It is your interpretion. He starts with "let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion" and at then end of the article he offers his opinion that "It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the correct match."

 

Now if we say that he referred astrologers to some other astrologers and not to his followers will be stretching it too far. He simply didn't have any alternate method of marriage matching and hence he draw that conclusion. Accept it or reject it is our choice, though it is the fact that KP readers do not offer any method for marriage matching. Lajmi ji vociferously advocate KPDP and I guess there are some other methods available as well if we see later KP literature. Need of KPDP tells absense of marriage matching method in KP.

 

What you are saying doesn't seem correct because of Shri KSK's nature of bluntly rejected the methods that doesn't work. He didn't reject it in the whole article. He is clearly recommending it to astrologers from above conclusion. Now assuming that these are some other astrologers and not KP followers, still he is recommending it to those astrologers and not rejecting it. I do not remember any other place in readers where Shri KSK has recommended some method to some astrologers and not to his followers. After all the readers are written for his followers and not for some other astrologers.

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

 

 

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:02 PM, vgr pavan <vgr_pavan1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Punitji Pranam,I still didnt understand what is the difference between mars dosha for compatibility and mars causing seperation.1.) Our Guruji gave preference to stars but not to the mere placement in a sign ,(like in vedic astrology). Even in star placements he went further and divided into sub divisions. He proved that the minute subdivisions are responsible in drastic changes in the lifes of the people born in the same place or twins.

In this context how it will be logical to belive that KSK suggested us to verify mars dosha (which deals only with placement in a sign). 2) KSK in many instances told that every one has to face the good or bad events in his life based upon the meritorious deeds done in his previous birth and no chart has influence on others life. then how will be to think that mars placement in wifes chart will cause problems even though husbands chart indicating hormonious wedded life !

3) why guruji suggested us to judge separately about longevity etc... If mars dosha can cause widowhood to either.4) p.no. 52. Guruji stated as follows :

One may ask, '"why should they attach too much importance to the position of mars alone ? we had never heard anybody taking of moon`s dosha or any other planet`s dosha or sun`s dosha or any other planets dosha . then does it mean that mars alone will do so much harm to the couple to the couple which other planets cannot do"?

the reply is that there are some people who unnecessarily exaggerate the evil results of mars. Most of the following points are not taken into consideration he stated 20 points against kuja dosha:

then how can we say that ksk advocated Kuja dosha analysis for match making.the reason for the para by Guruji as shown by you is that (as i feel)in the starting of the concept p.no. 55 :

"when parents attempt to fix the marriage of their sons and the daughters, the so called mars dosha , interpreted by astrologers according to their whims and fancies , confuses them due to varying opinion given by them."

after few lines :"let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion ":thats why he divided mars-dosha into three groups and said the anology of blood group (because ksk tries to say that we has to match the chart having kuja dosha with a chart having similar dosha but not the other two variants,)

therefore it is clear that KSK categorise Mars-dosha and stated his opinion only for those astrologers but not to his followers : "It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the correct match"

As per the mails of tinwinji i understood that the topic ended here, and later the last few paras were inserted So as to let the readers know how K.P. followers look at these "doshas" by taking only the sub-level significations and not the mere placement of mars in different signs.

hope i am clear.i am not critising any one this iis what i understood about this concept.Guruji bless us all. Peace and Prosperity to All !!VGR

--- On Mon, 7/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

@gro ups.com

 

 

Monday, 7 December, 2009, 12:50 AM

 

 

 

 

Dear Pavan ji,

 

It seem you are also mixing up two things. The Mars dosha section talks about two points -

1. Mars dosha for marriage matching

2. Mars dosha for predicting "difference of opinion, disagreement, dispute"

 

The section that has been appended later on in 1971 edition (starting from - To cause different of opinion ....) is for using Mars dosha for predicting difference of opinion, disagreement, disputes etc. Shri KSK himself clearly mentioned that any planet can do that. The study also proved the same point which Shri KSK has said. If you read my earlier email, I appreciated study for proving this point.

 

Though my point is that study didn't touch Mars dosha in marriage matching. Shri KSK said -

"It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise on the correct match."

 

It is clearly Shri KSK's opinion for using Mars dosha in "marriage matching" and not predicting on individual's horoscope. Point 1 (Mars dosha in marriage matching) was suggested by Shri KSK but not touched by study. My reason for writing the email was that people should not confuse that the study rejected both - mars dosha in prediction and mars dosha in marriage matching. The truth is that the study touched only mars dosha in prediction on individual's chart.

 

Generally Shri KSK was very truthful and blunt in calling a spade a spade. If he found that something is not working, he bluntly said that. Though when he says something to "weigh and consider various points of Mars Dosha", we should listen him till the time some study proves otherwise. We will have to wait for a study that checks bride and groom's chart simultaneously and conclude something. I hope now you got my point.

 

I do not have 1966 edition with me. Tw ji said that upto "It is, therefore, ..." is reprint of earlier edition of 1966. Which means "It is, therefore, ..." was the actual conclusion by Shri KSK and I do not think that there should be any doubt on it. He starts with that I'll tell you my opinion and finally he offers this opinion to "weigh and consider various points of Mars Dosha".

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

 

 

On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 11:27 PM, vgr pavan <vgr_pavan1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Punitji pranam,Pardon for interfering ....the qoute in reader 4 is

"To cause difference of opinion, disagreement, dispute, divorce etc. among the couple it is not left

to Mars alone, any planet can cause such undesirable effect provided

they happen to be deposited in such a position, that the sublord ofthe planet is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 or the sublord is

deposited in a constellation, the lord of which is the significatorof 6 or 10 or 12".Guruji , also stressed that "any planet can cause "such" undesirable effect , So he is telling

that we need not give preference to "Mars" alone , any planet can cause such results. Again in the next para" If the sub lord is mars or if it is in the constellation of mars , and if is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 , there will be separation. If it is saturn , silence and remain dumb-stick and strike. thus we have to predict."

here also he said "separation" will be caused by mars only when he is sublord or sub tenanted star lord and significator for 6,10,12. but not with mere placement of mars in various signs from asc, moon, venus.

[in P.no. 194 under the head "Divorce""there is no mars dosha in this chart because it is in a movable sign , it is debilitated ; conjoined with mercury . Yet look at the fate . thus taking the position of mars and offering predictions which appear more like a curse is not correct . but take the planets situated in the star or sub of mars in 1,2,4,8,12 ,. then , that planet tenanted in such a mars star will offer undesirable and disagreeable results.]

point no. 3 "Shri KSK clearly mentioned it for compatibility matching"i think you are pointing the para above the para given by me, it reads as follows:

"It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the correct match":

in the starting of this explanation on mars dosha P.no.55 KSK mentioned that : "Let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion. "

So i think that upto the above para (p.no. 69 ) is what Gurujis explanation about various rules and the later paragraphs are his "final" opinion.(which are last paras of the topic) .

point no.4 guruji explained what vedic astrological rules for "Mars Dosha " are . but not instructed us to follow the same. These are my opinions .......

Peace and Prosperity to All !!VGR --- On Sun, 6/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

 

@gro ups.com

 

 

Sunday, 6 December, 2009, 9:40 PM

 

 

Dear Tw ji,

 

1. Please tell clearly whether you are saying that 1966 is more authentic or 1971. I do not understand the reason for initial 6 points.

2. Even in 1971 edition, when we say that ".... it can not be left to Mars alone", it clearly means that Mars has impact, but it is not the "only" reason. Shri KSK were very clear about the impact of Mars dosha and that is the rason instead of rejecting it (which he has done quite often in readers for some other theories like Ashtakvarga) , he said that this is not the reason "alone."

3. Regarding point 7, the question is not whether everything is pre-destined or not. The question is whether it is correct to check Mars dosha on indiviaul's chart where Shri KSK clearly mentioned it for compatibility matching. Any conclusion drawn without considered both the partner's horoscope seems incomplete to me and against what Shri KSK has mentioned about it.

4. You also didn't answer my question, whether Moon and Venus were considered or not, apart from Ascendant, in the study? We must remember that Shri KSK clearly mentioned about inclusion of Moon and Venus with Ascendant while judging Mars dosha.

5. What ideas you are finding speculative? I am just quoting what Shri KSK has said and what proof you need more than what Shri KSK has said himself.

 

My objections and questions doesn't mean that I am try to belittle the study. The study is useful and establish that Mars dosha has limited or no value when it comes to predicting disagreement, dispute, and divorce etc. in marriage. It is a good and useful finding. Though the study doesn't tell anything about Mars dosha compatibility and we should be very clear about it. Most of the problems are said when Mars dosha doesn't match in bride and groom's chart and this is the utility of this theory in Hindu astrology (and Indian families). Also, in future study must be extended to include Moon and Venus, so that it can test the real definition of Mars dosha and not just an incomplete definition of Mars dosha. Till the time the scope of study is clear, people may confuse and think that Mars dosha is match making doesn't exist which is actually not convered in the study.

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 8:55 PM, TW <tw853 > wrote:

 

 

 

 

Dear Friends,

 

1. Mars dosha has been written in the KP Reader IV (Marriage, Married Life & Children) pages 51-69 (any Edition of reprinting). 2. Page 52, second and third parasOne may ask, "Why should they attach so much importance to the position of Mars alone? .......

The reply is that there are some people who unnessarily exaggerate the evil results of Mars.....3. Page 55, third paraLet me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion.

4. Page 69 fourth para It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise on the correct match.

5. Up to the above para is reprinted from the early writtings in the Krishnamurti Padhdhati Vol II, Sagar publications, 1966.6. Page 69 fourth to sixth paras are added in the mentioned KP Reader IV, first published in May 1971; fourth para is as given under:

To cause difference of opinion,disagreemen t, dispute, divorce etc. among the couple it is not left to Mars alone, any planet can cause such undesirable effect provided they happen to be deposited in such a position, that the sublord of the planet is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 or the sublord is deposited in a constellation, the lord of which is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12.

 

7. In KP, marriage matching, like education, occupation,death, is supposed to be predestined. 8. The speculative ideas would be sound, if and only if supported by a research study of sufficient numbers of charts other than here say experience or opinion.

 

Thanks and regards,

TW

 

@gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:>

 

 

 

 

 

> Dear Tw ji,> > I personally feel that the study missed few very basic but important points> and I would like to mention the same -> > 1. Problems due to Mars Dosha, tradionally as well as narrated by Shri KSK (

> http://logy. astrosage. com/mars- dosha), occurs only when the husband> and wife do not have same level of dosha. The problem exists only if a

> person having Mars dosha marries to the person who doesn't have Mars dosha> (even if we ignore level of dosha). The study seems to consider> only individual's chart and not two charts together. If it is studying

> only individual's chart, the study doesn't have much meaning. A study needs> to see Mars dosha in two situation and compare - a) mars dosha person> marriying to mars dosha person, b) mars dosha person not marring to Mars

> dosha person. Till the time we compare this two situation, how come we> conclude whether Mars Dosha works or not.> > 2. Traditonally as well as according to Shri KSK, Mars dosha should be> checked from Ascendant, Moon and Venus. It seems that study is considering

> only Ascedant and ignoring Moon and Venus. Again, if we do not follow the> definition properly, the conclusion reached can not be called correct.> > Here is the conclusion from your article -

> "It is to follow the KP rules only in considering longevity, matching,> separation, divorce, multi-marriage, happy or unhappy married life etc.> without mixing up with the traditional Manglik-to- Manglik matching rule and

> explain the public not to worry about Mars Dosha as suggested by Shri K.> Hariharan."> > Here again it seems that we are mixing up two things. KP does NOT provide> any tool for chart matching and Mars dosha is a tool for matching and not

> for prediction. KP clearly gives the rule for longevity etc., but doesn't> tell much about matching two charts. There is no doubt that KP is dependent> on traditional methods of horoscope matching as far as KP readers are

> concerned. This is the reason Koota as well as Mars dosha found place in KP.> In my opinion, the study is about Mars dosha as a predictive tool (which is> not discussed by Shri KSK) and NOT Mars dosha as a matching tool (which is

> discussed by Shri KSK).> > Thanks & Regards,> > Punit Pandey> >

> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:51 PM, TW tw853 wrote:> > >> >> > Dear Friends,> > What has been found is in the File section under:> > MARS DOSHA IN KP.doc

> > Regards,> > TW> >> >> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>, Punit

> > Pandey punitp@ wrote:> > >> > > Dear Friends,> > >> > > Here is what is found in third reader -> > >> > > http://logy. astrosage. com/mars- dosha

> > >> > > Thanks & Regards,> > >> > > Punit Pandey> > >> > >> > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Ramani kadavasalramani@ wrote:

> > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Shri Bansalj,> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Any kind of Mars Dosha including the Mars in 4th fron Lagna or Moon or

> > > > Venus gets cancelled when Mars is aspected by Saturn.> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Truly yours,> > > >> > > >

> > > >> > > > K.S.V.Ramani> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > ** @gro ups.com <%40. com>[

> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>] *On

> > > > Behalf Of *pankaj bansal> > > > *Sent:* 04 December 2009 22:50> > > >> > > > *To:* @gro ups.com <%40. com>

> > > > *Subject:* Re: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the> > years...> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >

> > > > Namaste Lajmiji,> > > >> > > > If Mars is placed In 4th house from> > > > Lagna & Venus and Placed in POORVASHADA Nakshatra(Venus) .Then there is No

> > So> > > > called Mars dosha and the Native Can Marriage anybody who had or had> > not> > > > mars dosha in this Birth Chart?Eagerly waiting for your precious> > response.

> > > >> > > > Thanks> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > ** Yogesh Lajmi yogeshlajmi@

> > > >> > > > *To:* @gro ups.com <%40. com>

 

 

 

 

> > > > *Cc:* Punit Pandey punitp@> > > > *Sent:* Fri, 4 December, 2009 8:05:18 PM> >> > > > *Subject:* MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Members,> > > >> > > > Not withstanding what has been averred by some "K.P.> > > > research scholars",

> > > >> > > > and whose research has been qestioned already in these columns by many> > KP> > > > followers,> > > >> > > > *and also,*my own experience about Mars Dosha,over the years,and after

> > > > analysing the charts of many a married couples,for marital> > > > problems,especially ,after marriage,I agree 100% with the observation> > in> > > > K.P. books that *Mars posited in Sun's star,or own star,and occuping

> > > > houses I,II,IV,VII, VIII & XII** **alone causes Mars Dosha**...*> > > >> > > > I invite the opinion of all members...on this very> > > > controversial matter,and I must add here that almost ALL of my clients

> > who> > > > come to consult me,strongly believe about the existence of Mars> > Dosha...so> > > > much so that they attribute almost every domestic problem to the> > existence

> > > > of Mars Dosha,and keep asking for *"remedies".. .* !> > > >> > > > Which I patiently have to explain in detail...based> > > > on their own experience in the practise of the K.P. System...

> > > >> > > > This is just to illustrate how deeply the ill-effects> > > > of Mars are embedded in the minds of people,at large...> > > >> > > > Am looking forward to comments from discerning

> > > > members...> > > >> > > > With kind regards,> > > >> > > > Yogesh Lajmi.> > > >> > > > * *> > > >

> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > Win 1 of 4 Sony home entertainment packs thanks to 7. Enter now<> > http://us.lrd. / _ylc=X3oDMTJxN2x 2ZmNpBF9zAzIwMjM 2MTY2MTMEdG1fZG1 lY2gDVGV4dCBMaW5 rBHRtX2xuawNVMTE wMzk3NwR0bV9uZXQ DWWFob28hBHRtX3B vcwN0YWdsaW5lBHR tX3BwdHkDYXVueg- -/SIG=14600t3ni/ **http%3A/ au.rd.. com/mail/ tagline/sony/ *http%3A/ au.docs.. com/homepageset/ %3Fp1=other% 26p2=au%26p3= mailtagline > > >> > > > .> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage<

> > http://in.rd. / tagline_yyi_ 1/*http:/ in.. com/>> > > > .> > > >

> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

 

 

 

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Dear Pavan ji,

 

//are you saying that Guruji doesnt have any match making  at his time for him thats why neither supported nor rejected Mars dosha,//

You got it right. He didn't had any method for horoscope matching and Mars dosha doesn't fit well in KP. The dilemma is quite clear from the article. I have repeated this understanding of mine many times now. His dilemma is clear and that is the reason he has to append few more paragraphs to the article, which actually made article more confusing.

 

//An author like Sri KSK who released an entire book on marriage & progeny ( giving highest preference than any set of events ie. money, profession etc..) and rejected all types of " poruthams " can not comment on mars dosha clearly and left it to his students (not mentioning about that) for further research !//

This is a fact. Probably he found marriage most challenging and difficult to interpret and hence had to devote maximum text to it. No wonder, we have seen many failures in predicting marriage time using KP principles in this forum itself.

 

He also was not able to conclude about predicting height of the partner and he mentioned the same in fourth reader. In third reader he said that the research is going on progression. There are many areas where he was not able to conclude. Astrology is ocean and we can not expect him to give us everything. By including all seemingly contradictory content in the readers, he wanted his followers to be open, accepting, and ready for research. There are reasons why he didn't write to-the-point book like Nakshatra Chintamani but opted altogether different approach in his readers.

 

//what is your opinion on these questions, Does it mean that KSK didnt know answers for these queries and suggested Mars-dosha for match making.//

He tried to answer these questions and some other questions he raised earlier in the form of conclusion. If we read the article we can find that he answered question based on his understanding.

 

On a side note, if he didn't know the answer, then he didn't know the answer. What is the harm in accepting that? Let us not treat Shri KSK as the end of astrology but a new beginning of astrology. He knew few principles very well and he clearly taught us. Some of the principles where he was also unsure, left for future research. Research will continue and should not end with Shri KSK, and it was his wish.

 

//Practically in how many  divorced charts we find mars dosham ..........let us collect those charts and study and look for ourselves.//

I agree that this is the best way to conclude a topic. We are doing it in this forum for a long time and should keep doing. There is no alternate to practical study.

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 5:39 PM, vgr pavan <vgr_pavan1 wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Punitji Pranam,

Shri KSK neither rejected nor advocated Mars dosha because he didn't have any alternate for marriage matching at that time. He simply shared his opinion and left it up to future development. Mars dosha is not alone there are many cases that he left untouched for future.

are you saying that Guruji doesnt have any match making  at his time for him thats why neither supported nor rejected Mars dosha,An author like Sri KSK who released an entire book on marriage & progeny ( giving highest preference than any set of events ie. money, profession etc..) and rejected all types of " poruthams " can not comment on mars dosha clearly and left it to his students (not mentioning about that) for further research !

he clearly stated that one should not unnecessarily worry about kuja dosha what else will be the proof than this,.he clearly and straightly asked the points : 18. If there is no such dosha in both  the horoscopes , is a happy and harmonious wedded life guaranteed  for a long no.of years ?

19. as the houses 2,7,11 indicate ones marriage as well as the state of married life , if these houses are occupied   by benefics  and if mars occupies an evil sign , even then will there be any bad effect ?20. If the houses 2,7 and 11 are owned by malefics and occupied by malefics and there is no mars dosha , how can the partners lead a prosperous  life ? 

what is your opinion on these questions, Does it mean that KSK didnt know answers for these queries and suggested Mars-dosha for match making.KSK never told that compatibility analysis for prosperous married life. he just asked us to see whether the native is blessed with prosperous married life or not, if he has not such luck .......which chart  we shall select for him. 

KSK always said that see the " praptham " (possibility) not the " porutham " (compatibilty)which his students like M.C.khare, sivapadam etc mentioned in their articles.........Practically in how many  divorced charts we find mars dosham ..........

let us collect those charts and study and look for ourselves.I am not Pointing any one , i want to learn more from this debate.....(frankly speaking your discussion lead to me read this  topic again and again, thanks for that ) Peace and Prosperity to All !!VGR--- On Tue, 8/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:

 

Punit Pandey <punitpRe: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

Tuesday, 8 December, 2009, 6:42 PM

 

 

 

Dear Pavan ji,

 

According to him the Mars dosha, as it is judged traditionally, is not correct. He recommends us to consider those 20 points while judging Mars dosha. This is another differentiator of the article. 

 

He is trying to answer the question which he asked himself. He also says that there are people who unnecessary exaggerate Mars dosha without considering 20 given points. In other words, Mars dosha should be judged keeping those 20 points in mind.  

 

Does it not mean that he is recommending Mars dosha under some of his recommendations that he kept telling in the article?

 

It is not rejection, but a correction to traditional understating IMO.

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 6:16 PM, vgr pavan <vgr_pavan1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

punitji pranam,waiting for your reply on point 4 .regards Peace and Prosperity to All !!VGR

--- On Tue, 8/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

@gro ups.com

 

 

Tuesday, 8 December, 2009, 5:29 PM

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Pavan ji,

 

// I  still didnt understand what is the difference between mars dosha for compatibility and mars causing seperation. //

As you know marriage matching is used to decide upon the horoscope of bride or groom. How Mars dosha is used tradionally? Is it used on single horoscope?

 

Marriage matching is done on two charts. It is not about making some prediction for individual but composite study of impact of two horoscopes on each other. KP doesn't have any method for marriage matching in readers and hence we can see development of KPDP later.

 

//1.) Our Guruji gave preference to stars  but not to the mere placement in a sign ,(like in vedic astrology). Even in star placements he went further and divided into sub divisions. He proved that the minute subdivisions are responsible in drastic changes in the lifes of the people born in the same place or twins.

In this context how it will be logical to belive that KSK suggested us to verify mars dosha (which deals only  with placement in a sign). //

Shri KSK also talked about mere placement of Saturn can cause Punarphoo (http://logy. astrosage. com/punarphoo). KP readers are full of such examples.

 

I agree it doesn't gel well with KP and I have written a seperate email about it. But it was Shri KSK's choice to include this article. Probably he found something important and that is the reason we find it in readers. His choice. Contradictions are nothing new in KP readers.

 

//3) why guruji suggested us to judge separately about longevity etc... If mars dosha can cause widowhood to either.//

You missed the point that the appended paragraphs were not conclusion. Please see my discussion with Tw ji and you will find that the conclusion is the paragraph where Shri KSK sugges weighing Mars Dosha in both the chart. 

 

The appended line, as those apply on individual chart, doesn't say anything about Mars dosha in marriage matching. If you will read tradional astrology books, you will also find application of Mars dosha in individual's horoscope and it is rejected by Shri KSK. The same is also proven by the study.

 

//then how can we say that ksk advocated Kuja dosha analysis for match making.//

Shri KSK neither rejected nor advocated Mars dosha because he didn't have any alternate for marriage matching at that time. He simply shared his opinion and left it up to future development. Mars dosha is not alone there are many cases that he left untouched for future.

 

Now Mars dosha exists in Astro Secrets (as also shared by Lajmi ji) and KPDP. Again it is individual's choice to accept or reject it.   

 

//therefore  it is clear that KSK categorise Mars-dosha and stated his opinion only for those astrologers but not to his followers : //

It is your interpretion. He starts with " let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion " and at then end of the article he offers his opinion that " It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the correct match. "

 

Now if we say that he referred astrologers to some other astrologers and not to his followers will be stretching it too far. He simply didn't have any alternate method of marriage matching and hence he draw that conclusion. Accept it or reject it is our choice, though it is the fact that KP readers do not offer any method for marriage matching. Lajmi ji vociferously advocate KPDP and I guess there are some other methods available as well if we see later KP literature. Need of KPDP tells absense of marriage matching method in KP.

 

What you are saying doesn't seem correct because of Shri KSK's nature of bluntly rejected the methods that doesn't work. He didn't reject it in the whole article. He is clearly recommending it to astrologers from above conclusion. Now assuming that these are some other astrologers and not KP followers, still he is recommending it to those astrologers and not rejecting it. I do not remember any other place in readers where Shri KSK has recommended some method to some astrologers and not to his followers. After all the readers are written for his followers and not for some other astrologers.  

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

 

 

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:02 PM, vgr pavan <vgr_pavan1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Punitji Pranam,I  still didnt understand what is the difference between mars dosha for compatibility and mars causing seperation.1.) Our Guruji gave preference to stars  but not to the mere placement in a sign ,(like in vedic astrology). Even in star placements he went further and divided into sub divisions. He proved that the minute subdivisions are responsible in drastic changes in the lifes of the people born in the same place or twins.

In this context how it will be logical to belive that KSK suggested us to verify mars dosha (which deals only  with placement in a sign). 2) KSK in many instances told that every one has to face the good or bad events in his life based upon the meritorious deeds done in his previous birth and no  chart has influence on others life. then how will be to think that mars placement in wifes chart will cause problems even though husbands chart indicating hormonious wedded life !

3) why guruji suggested us to judge separately about longevity etc... If mars dosha can cause widowhood to either.4) p.no. 52. Guruji stated as follows :

One may ask, ' " why should they attach too much importance to the position of mars alone ? we had never heard anybody taking of moon`s dosha or any other planet`s dosha or sun`s dosha or any other  planets dosha . then does it mean that mars alone will do so much  harm to the couple to the couple which other planets cannot do " ?

the reply is that there are some people who unnecessarily exaggerate the evil results of mars. Most of the following points are not taken into consideration  he stated 20 points against kuja dosha:

then how can we say that ksk advocated Kuja dosha analysis for match making.the reason for the para by Guruji as shown by you  is that (as i feel)in the starting of the concept  p.no. 55 :

" when parents attempt  to fix the marriage of their sons and the daughters, the so called mars dosha , interpreted by astrologers according to their whims and fancies , confuses them due to varying opinion given by them. "  

  after few lines : " let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion " :thats why he divided mars-dosha into three groups and said the anology of blood group (because ksk tries to say that we has to match the chart having  kuja dosha with a chart having similar dosha but not the other two variants,)

therefore  it is clear that KSK categorise Mars-dosha and stated his opinion only for those astrologers but not to his followers : " It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the correct match "

As per the mails of tinwinji i understood that the topic  ended here, and later the last few paras were inserted So as to let the readers know how  K.P. followers look at these " doshas " by taking only the sub-level significations and not the mere placement of mars in different signs.

hope i am clear.i am not critising any one this iis what i understood about this concept.Guruji bless us all. Peace and Prosperity to All !!VGR

--- On Mon, 7/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

@gro ups.com

 

 

Monday, 7 December, 2009, 12:50 AM

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Pavan ji,

 

It seem you are also mixing up two things. The Mars dosha section talks about two points -

1. Mars dosha for marriage matching

2. Mars dosha for predicting " difference of opinion, disagreement, dispute "

 

The section that has been appended later on in 1971 edition (starting from - To cause different of opinion ....) is for using Mars dosha for predicting difference of opinion, disagreement, disputes etc. Shri KSK himself clearly mentioned that any planet can do that. The study also proved the same point which Shri KSK has said. If you read my earlier email, I appreciated study for proving this point.

 

Though my point is that study didn't touch Mars dosha in marriage matching. Shri KSK said -

" It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh and  consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise on the correct match. "

 

It is clearly Shri KSK's opinion for using Mars dosha in " marriage matching " and not predicting on individual's horoscope. Point 1 (Mars dosha in marriage matching) was suggested by Shri KSK but not touched by study. My reason for writing the email was that people should not confuse that the study rejected both - mars dosha in prediction and mars dosha in marriage matching. The truth is that the study touched only mars dosha in prediction on individual's chart.

 

Generally Shri KSK was very truthful and blunt in calling a spade a spade. If he found that something is not working, he bluntly said that. Though when he says something to " weigh and consider various points of Mars Dosha " , we should listen him till the time some study proves otherwise. We will have to wait for a study that checks bride and groom's chart simultaneously and conclude something. I hope now you got my point.

 

I do not have 1966 edition with me. Tw ji said that upto " It is, therefore, ... " is reprint of earlier edition of 1966. Which means " It is, therefore, ... " was the actual conclusion by Shri KSK and I do not think that there should be any doubt on it. He starts with that I'll tell you my opinion and finally he offers this opinion to " weigh and consider various points of Mars Dosha " .

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

 

 

On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 11:27 PM, vgr pavan <vgr_pavan1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Punitji pranam,Pardon for interfering ....the qoute in reader 4 is

" To cause difference of opinion, disagreement, dispute, divorce etc. among the couple it is not left

to Mars alone, any planet can cause such undesirable effect provided

they happen to be deposited in such a position, that the sublord ofthe planet is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 or the sublord is

deposited in a constellation, the lord of which is the significatorof 6 or 10 or 12 " .Guruji , also stressed that " any planet can cause " such " undesirable effect , So he is telling

that we need not give preference to " Mars " alone , any planet can cause such results.   Again in the next  para " If the sub lord is mars or if it is in the constellation of mars , and if is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 , there will be separation. If it is saturn , silence and remain dumb-stick and strike. thus we have to predict. "

here also he said " separation " will be caused by mars  only when he is sublord or sub tenanted star lord and significator for 6,10,12.  but not with mere placement of mars in various signs from asc, moon, venus.

 [in P.no. 194 under the head " Divorce " " there is no mars dosha in this chart because it is in a movable sign , it is debilitated ; conjoined with mercury . Yet look at the fate . thus taking the position of mars and offering predictions which appear more like a curse is not correct . but take the planets situated in the  star or sub of mars in 1,2,4,8,12 ,. then , that planet tenanted in such a mars star will offer undesirable and disagreeable results.]   

point no. 3    " Shri KSK clearly mentioned it for compatibility matching " i think you are pointing the para above the para given by me, it reads as follows:

" It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the correct match " :

in the starting of this explanation on mars dosha P.no.55  KSK mentioned that  : " Let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion. "

So i think that upto the above para (p.no. 69 ) is what Gurujis explanation about various rules and the later paragraphs are his " final " opinion.(which are last paras of the topic) .

point no.4 guruji explained what vedic astrological rules for " Mars Dosha " are . but not instructed us to follow the same. These are my opinions .......

Peace and Prosperity to All !!VGR --- On Sun, 6/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

 

@gro ups.com

 

 

Sunday, 6 December, 2009, 9:40 PM

 

 

 

Dear Tw ji,

 

1. Please tell clearly whether you are saying that 1966 is more authentic or 1971. I do not understand the reason for initial 6 points.

2. Even in 1971 edition, when we say that " .... it can not be left to Mars alone " , it clearly means that Mars has impact, but it is not the " only " reason. Shri KSK were very clear about the impact of Mars dosha and that is the rason instead of rejecting it (which he has done quite often in readers for some other theories like Ashtakvarga) , he said that this is not the reason " alone. "

3. Regarding point 7, the question is not whether everything is pre-destined or not. The question is whether it is correct to check Mars dosha on indiviaul's chart where Shri KSK clearly mentioned it for compatibility matching. Any conclusion drawn without considered both the partner's horoscope seems incomplete to me and against what Shri KSK has mentioned about it.

4. You also didn't answer my question, whether Moon and Venus were considered or not, apart from Ascendant, in the study? We must remember that Shri KSK clearly mentioned about inclusion of Moon and Venus with Ascendant while judging Mars dosha.

5. What ideas you are finding speculative? I am just quoting what Shri KSK has said and what proof you need more than what Shri KSK has said himself.

 

My objections and questions doesn't mean that I am try to belittle the study. The study is useful and establish that Mars dosha has limited or no value when it comes to predicting disagreement, dispute, and divorce etc. in marriage. It is a good and useful finding. Though the study doesn't tell anything about Mars dosha compatibility and we should be very clear about it. Most of the problems are said when Mars dosha doesn't match in bride and groom's chart and this is the utility of this theory in Hindu astrology (and Indian families). Also, in future study must be extended to include Moon and Venus, so that it can test the real definition of Mars dosha and not just an incomplete definition of Mars dosha. Till the time the scope of study is clear, people may confuse and think that Mars dosha is match making doesn't exist which is actually not convered in the study.

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 8:55 PM, TW <tw853 > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Friends,

 

1. Mars dosha has been written in the KP Reader IV (Marriage, Married Life & Children) pages 51-69 (any Edition of reprinting). 2. Page 52, second and third parasOne may ask, " Why should they attach so much importance to the position of Mars alone? .......

The reply is that there are some people who unnessarily exaggerate the evil results of Mars.....3. Page 55, third paraLet me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion.

4. Page 69 fourth para It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise on the correct match.   

5. Up to the above para is reprinted from the early writtings in the Krishnamurti Padhdhati Vol II, Sagar publications, 1966.6. Page 69 fourth to sixth paras are added in the mentioned KP Reader IV, first published in May 1971; fourth para is as given under:

To cause difference of opinion,disagreemen t, dispute, divorce etc. among the couple it is not left to Mars alone, any planet can cause such undesirable effect provided they happen to be deposited in such a position, that the sublord of the planet is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 or the sublord is deposited in a constellation, the lord of which is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12. 

 

7. In KP, marriage matching, like education, occupation,death, is supposed to be predestined. 8. The speculative ideas would be sound, if and only if supported by a research study of sufficient numbers of charts other than here say experience or opinion.

 

Thanks and regards,

TW

 

@gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:>

 

 

 

 

 

> Dear Tw ji,> > I personally feel that the study missed few very basic but important points> and I would like to mention the same -> > 1. Problems due to Mars Dosha, tradionally as well as narrated by Shri KSK (

> http://logy. astrosage. com/mars- dosha), occurs only when the husband> and wife do not have same level of dosha. The problem exists only if a

> person having Mars dosha marries to the person who doesn't have Mars dosha> (even if we ignore level of dosha). The study seems to consider> only individual's chart and not two charts together. If it is studying

> only individual's chart, the study doesn't have much meaning. A study needs> to see Mars dosha in two situation and compare - a) mars dosha person> marriying to mars dosha person, b) mars dosha person not marring to Mars

> dosha person. Till the time we compare this two situation, how come we> conclude whether Mars Dosha works or not.> > 2. Traditonally as well as according to Shri KSK, Mars dosha should be> checked from Ascendant, Moon and Venus. It seems that study is considering

> only Ascedant and ignoring Moon and Venus. Again, if we do not follow the> definition properly, the conclusion reached can not be called correct.> > Here is the conclusion from your article -

> " It is to follow the KP rules only in considering longevity, matching,> separation, divorce, multi-marriage, happy or unhappy married life etc.> without mixing up with the traditional Manglik-to- Manglik matching rule and

> explain the public not to worry about Mars Dosha as suggested by Shri K.> Hariharan. " > > Here again it seems that we are mixing up two things. KP does NOT provide> any tool for chart matching and Mars dosha is a tool for matching and not

> for prediction. KP clearly gives the rule for longevity etc., but doesn't> tell much about matching two charts. There is no doubt that KP is dependent> on traditional methods of horoscope matching as far as KP readers are

> concerned. This is the reason Koota as well as Mars dosha found place in KP.> In my opinion, the study is about Mars dosha as a predictive tool (which is> not discussed by Shri KSK) and NOT Mars dosha as a matching tool (which is

> discussed by Shri KSK).> > Thanks & Regards,> > Punit Pandey> >

> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:51 PM, TW tw853 wrote:> > >> >> > Dear Friends,> > What has been found is in the File section under:> > MARS DOSHA IN KP.doc

> > Regards,> > TW> >> >> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>, Punit

> > Pandey punitp@ wrote:> > >> > > Dear Friends,> > >> > > Here is what is found in third reader -> > >> > > http://logy. astrosage. com/mars- dosha

> > >> > > Thanks & Regards,> > >> > > Punit Pandey> > >> > >> > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Ramani kadavasalramani@ wrote:

> > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Shri Bansalj,> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Any kind of Mars Dosha including the Mars in 4th fron Lagna or Moon or

> > > > Venus gets cancelled when Mars is aspected by Saturn.> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Truly yours,> > > >> > > >

> > > >> > > > K.S.V.Ramani> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > ** @gro ups.com <%40. com>[

> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>] *On

> > > > Behalf Of *pankaj bansal> > > > *Sent:* 04 December 2009 22:50> > > >> > > > *To:* @gro ups.com <%40. com>

> > > > *Subject:* Re: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the> > years...> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >

> > > > Namaste Lajmiji,> > > >> > > > If Mars is placed In 4th house from> > > > Lagna & Venus and Placed in POORVASHADA Nakshatra(Venus) .Then there is No

> > So> > > > called Mars dosha and the Native Can Marriage anybody who had or had> > not> > > > mars dosha in this Birth Chart?Eagerly waiting for your precious> > response.

> > > >> > > > Thanks> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > ** Yogesh Lajmi yogeshlajmi@

> > > >> > > > *To:* @gro ups.com <%40. com>

 

 

 

 

> > > > *Cc:* Punit Pandey punitp@> > > > *Sent:* Fri, 4 December, 2009 8:05:18 PM> >> > > > *Subject:* MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Members,> > > >> > > > Not withstanding what has been averred by some " K.P.> > > > research scholars " ,

> > > >> > > > and whose research has been qestioned already in these columns by many> > KP> > > > followers,> > > >> > > > *and also,*my own experience about Mars Dosha,over the years,and after

> > > > analysing the charts of many a married couples,for marital> > > > problems,especially ,after marriage,I agree 100% with the observation> > in> > > > K.P. books that *Mars posited in Sun's star,or own star,and occuping

> > > > houses I,II,IV,VII, VIII & XII** **alone causes Mars Dosha**...*> > > >> > > > I invite the opinion of all members...on this very> > > > controversial matter,and I must add here that almost ALL of my clients

> > who> > > > come to consult me,strongly believe about the existence of Mars> > Dosha...so> > > > much so that they attribute almost every domestic problem to the> > existence

> > > > of Mars Dosha,and keep asking for * " remedies " .. .* !> > > >> > > > Which I patiently have to explain in detail...based> > > > on their own experience in the practise of the K.P. System...

> > > >> > > > This is just to illustrate how deeply the ill-effects> > > > of Mars are embedded in the minds of people,at large...> > > >> > > > Am looking forward to comments from discerning

> > > > members...> > > >> > > > With kind regards,> > > >> > > > Yogesh Lajmi.> > > >> > > > * *> > > >

> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > Win 1 of 4 Sony home entertainment packs thanks to 7. Enter now<> > http://us.lrd. / _ylc=X3oDMTJxN2x 2ZmNpBF9zAzIwMjM 2MTY2MTMEdG1fZG1 lY2gDVGV4dCBMaW5 rBHRtX2xuawNVMTE wMzk3NwR0bV9uZXQ DWWFob28hBHRtX3B vcwN0YWdsaW5lBHR tX3BwdHkDYXVueg- -/SIG=14600t3ni/ **http%3A/ au.rd.. com/mail/ tagline/sony/ *http%3A/ au.docs.. com/homepageset/ %3Fp1=other% 26p2=au%26p3= mailtagline > > >> > > > .> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage<

> > http://in.rd. / tagline_yyi_ 1/*http:/ in.. com/>> > > > .> > > >

> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Dear friends, You will kindly recall few years ago our friend Kanak Bosmia made a study on applicability of Mars Dosha and concluded thru case studies on many charts, as " not- applicable". Few years ago,I was studying horoscopes for my elder son,when my son was past 30 then. For the age group of most girls in the age group 25 to 30,most cases were rejected due Mars Dosha. My analyses revealed interestingly, most career girls have Mars Dosha in this age bracket.Additionally they were career oriented girls, with a technical background(IT included). To conclude,Mars Dosha is common and

nothing to be feared. In a sensible matching exercise,I would see Lagna, Moon, Mars Venus Sat and Jup placements . Avoid 6/8 placements. Mars in girls case and Venus in boys case shud not be retro.this supercedes many other deficiencies. Ideally after examining individual merits of horoscopes on stand-alone basis, I would greater priority to DBAs to have have coincidental(matching) good periods.All other considerations come afterwards. Regards, Satish--- On Wed, 12/9/09, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:Punit Pandey

<punitpRe: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years... Date: Wednesday, December 9, 2009, 6:25 PM

 

 

Dear Pavan ji,

 

//are you saying that Guruji doesnt have any match making at his time for him thats why neither supported nor rejected Mars dosha,//

You got it right. He didn't had any method for horoscope matching and Mars dosha doesn't fit well in KP. The dilemma is quite clear from the article. I have repeated this understanding of mine many times now. His dilemma is clear and that is the reason he has to append few more paragraphs to the article, which actually made article more confusing.

 

//An author like Sri KSK who released an entire book on marriage & progeny ( giving highest preference than any set of events ie. money, profession etc..) and rejected all types of "poruthams" can not comment on mars dosha clearly and left it to his students (not mentioning about that) for further research !//

This is a fact. Probably he found marriage most challenging and difficult to interpret and hence had to devote maximum text to it. No wonder, we have seen many failures in predicting marriage time using KP principles in this forum itself.

 

He also was not able to conclude about predicting height of the partner and he mentioned the same in fourth reader. In third reader he said that the research is going on progression. There are many areas where he was not able to conclude. Astrology is ocean and we can not expect him to give us everything. By including all seemingly contradictory content in the readers, he wanted his followers to be open, accepting, and ready for research. There are reasons why he didn't write to-the-point book like Nakshatra Chintamani but opted altogether different approach in his readers.

 

//what is your opinion on these questions, Does it mean that KSK didnt know answers for these queries and suggested Mars-dosha for match making.//

He tried to answer these questions and some other questions he raised earlier in the form of conclusion. If we read the article we can find that he answered question based on his understanding.

 

On a side note, if he didn't know the answer, then he didn't know the answer. What is the harm in accepting that? Let us not treat Shri KSK as the end of astrology but a new beginning of astrology. He knew few principles very well and he clearly taught us. Some of the principles where he was also unsure, left for future research. Research will continue and should not end with Shri KSK, and it was his wish.

 

//Practically in how many divorced charts we find mars dosham ..........let us collect those charts and study and look for ourselves.//

I agree that this is the best way to conclude a topic. We are doing it in this forum for a long time and should keep doing. There is no alternate to practical study.

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 5:39 PM, vgr pavan <vgr_pavan1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Punitji Pranam,

Shri KSK neither rejected nor advocated Mars dosha because he didn't have any alternate for marriage matching at that time. He simply shared his opinion and left it up to future development. Mars dosha is not alone there are many cases that he left untouched for future.

are you saying that Guruji doesnt have any match making at his time for him thats why neither supported nor rejected Mars dosha,An author like Sri KSK who released an entire book on marriage & progeny ( giving highest preference than any set of events ie. money, profession etc..) and rejected all types of "poruthams" can not comment on mars dosha clearly and left it to his students (not mentioning about that) for further research !

he clearly stated that one should not unnecessarily worry about kuja dosha what else will be the proof than this,.he clearly and straightly asked the points : 18. If there is no such dosha in both the horoscopes , is a happy and harmonious wedded life guaranteed for a long no.of years ?

19. as the houses 2,7,11 indicate ones marriage as well as the state of married life , if these houses are occupied by benefics and if mars occupies an evil sign , even then will there be any bad effect ?20. If the houses 2,7 and 11 are owned by malefics and occupied by malefics and there is no mars dosha , how can the partners lead a prosperous life ?

what is your opinion on these questions, Does it mean that KSK didnt know answers for these queries and suggested Mars-dosha for match making.KSK never told that compatibility analysis for prosperous married life. he just asked us to see whether the native is blessed with prosperous married life or not, if he has not such luck .......which chart we shall select for him.

KSK always said that see the "praptham"(possibility) not the "porutham"(compatibilty)which his students like M.C.khare, sivapadam etc mentioned in their articles.... .....Practically in how many divorced charts we find mars dosham ..........

let us collect those charts and study and look for ourselves.I am not Pointing any one , i want to learn more from this debate.....(frankly speaking your discussion lead to me read this topic again and again, thanks for that ) Peace and Prosperity to All !!VGR--- On Tue, 8/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...@gro ups.com

Tuesday, 8 December, 2009, 6:42 PM

 

 

Dear Pavan ji,

 

According to him the Mars dosha, as it is judged traditionally, is not correct. He recommends us to consider those 20 points while judging Mars dosha. This is another differentiator of the article.

 

He is trying to answer the question which he asked himself. He also says that there are people who unnecessary exaggerate Mars dosha without considering 20 given points. In other words, Mars dosha should be judged keeping those 20 points in mind.

 

Does it not mean that he is recommending Mars dosha under some of his recommendations that he kept telling in the article?

 

It is not rejection, but a correction to traditional understating IMO.

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 6:16 PM, vgr pavan <vgr_pavan1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

punitji pranam,waiting for your reply on point 4 .regards Peace and Prosperity to All !!VGR

--- On Tue, 8/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

@gro ups.com

 

 

Tuesday, 8 December, 2009, 5:29 PM

 

 

 

 

Dear Pavan ji,

 

// I still didnt understand what is the difference between mars dosha for compatibility and mars causing seperation. //

As you know marriage matching is used to decide upon the horoscope of bride or groom. How Mars dosha is used tradionally? Is it used on single horoscope?

 

Marriage matching is done on two charts. It is not about making some prediction for individual but composite study of impact of two horoscopes on each other. KP doesn't have any method for marriage matching in readers and hence we can see development of KPDP later.

 

//1.) Our Guruji gave preference to stars but not to the mere placement in a sign ,(like in vedic astrology). Even in star placements he went further and divided into sub divisions. He proved that the minute subdivisions are responsible in drastic changes in the lifes of the people born in the same place or twins.

In this context how it will be logical to belive that KSK suggested us to verify mars dosha (which deals only with placement in a sign). //

Shri KSK also talked about mere placement of Saturn can cause Punarphoo (http://logy. astrosage. com/punarphoo). KP readers are full of such examples.

 

I agree it doesn't gel well with KP and I have written a seperate email about it. But it was Shri KSK's choice to include this article. Probably he found something important and that is the reason we find it in readers. His choice. Contradictions are nothing new in KP readers.

 

//3) why guruji suggested us to judge separately about longevity etc... If mars dosha can cause widowhood to either.//

You missed the point that the appended paragraphs were not conclusion. Please see my discussion with Tw ji and you will find that the conclusion is the paragraph where Shri KSK sugges weighing Mars Dosha in both the chart.

 

The appended line, as those apply on individual chart, doesn't say anything about Mars dosha in marriage matching. If you will read tradional astrology books, you will also find application of Mars dosha in individual's horoscope and it is rejected by Shri KSK. The same is also proven by the study.

 

//then how can we say that ksk advocated Kuja dosha analysis for match making.//

Shri KSK neither rejected nor advocated Mars dosha because he didn't have any alternate for marriage matching at that time. He simply shared his opinion and left it up to future development. Mars dosha is not alone there are many cases that he left untouched for future.

 

Now Mars dosha exists in Astro Secrets (as also shared by Lajmi ji) and KPDP. Again it is individual's choice to accept or reject it.

 

//therefore it is clear that KSK categorise Mars-dosha and stated his opinion only for those astrologers but not to his followers : //

It is your interpretion. He starts with "let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion" and at then end of the article he offers his opinion that "It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the correct match."

 

Now if we say that he referred astrologers to some other astrologers and not to his followers will be stretching it too far. He simply didn't have any alternate method of marriage matching and hence he draw that conclusion. Accept it or reject it is our choice, though it is the fact that KP readers do not offer any method for marriage matching. Lajmi ji vociferously advocate KPDP and I guess there are some other methods available as well if we see later KP literature. Need of KPDP tells absense of marriage matching method in KP.

 

What you are saying doesn't seem correct because of Shri KSK's nature of bluntly rejected the methods that doesn't work. He didn't reject it in the whole article. He is clearly recommending it to astrologers from above conclusion. Now assuming that these are some other astrologers and not KP followers, still he is recommending it to those astrologers and not rejecting it. I do not remember any other place in readers where Shri KSK has recommended some method to some astrologers and not to his followers. After all the readers are written for his followers and not for some other astrologers.

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

 

 

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:02 PM, vgr pavan <vgr_pavan1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Punitji Pranam,I still didnt understand what is the difference between mars dosha for compatibility and mars causing seperation.1.) Our Guruji gave preference to stars but not to the mere placement in a sign ,(like in vedic astrology). Even in star placements he went further and divided into sub divisions. He proved that the minute subdivisions are responsible in drastic changes in the lifes of the people born in the same place or twins.

In this context how it will be logical to belive that KSK suggested us to verify mars dosha (which deals only with placement in a sign). 2) KSK in many instances told that every one has to face the good or bad events in his life based upon the meritorious deeds done in his previous birth and no chart has influence on others life. then how will be to think that mars placement in wifes chart will cause problems even though husbands chart indicating hormonious wedded life !

3) why guruji suggested us to judge separately about longevity etc... If mars dosha can cause widowhood to either.4) p.no. 52. Guruji stated as follows :

One may ask, '"why should they attach too much importance to the position of mars alone ? we had never heard anybody taking of moon`s dosha or any other planet`s dosha or sun`s dosha or any other planets dosha . then does it mean that mars alone will do so much harm to the couple to the couple which other planets cannot do"?

the reply is that there are some people who unnecessarily exaggerate the evil results of mars. Most of the following points are not taken into consideration he stated 20 points against kuja dosha:

then how can we say that ksk advocated Kuja dosha analysis for match making.the reason for the para by Guruji as shown by you is that (as i feel)in the starting of the concept p.no. 55 :

"when parents attempt to fix the marriage of their sons and the daughters, the so called mars dosha , interpreted by astrologers according to their whims and fancies , confuses them due to varying opinion given by them."

after few lines :"let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion ":thats why he divided mars-dosha into three groups and said the anology of blood group (because ksk tries to say that we has to match the chart having kuja dosha with a chart having similar dosha but not the other two variants,)

therefore it is clear that KSK categorise Mars-dosha and stated his opinion only for those astrologers but not to his followers : "It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the correct match"

As per the mails of tinwinji i understood that the topic ended here, and later the last few paras were inserted So as to let the readers know how K.P. followers look at these "doshas" by taking only the sub-level significations and not the mere placement of mars in different signs.

hope i am clear.i am not critising any one this iis what i understood about this concept.Guruji bless us all. Peace and Prosperity to All !!VGR

--- On Mon, 7/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

@gro ups.com

 

 

Monday, 7 December, 2009, 12:50 AM

 

 

 

 

Dear Pavan ji,

 

It seem you are also mixing up two things. The Mars dosha section talks about two points -

1. Mars dosha for marriage matching

2. Mars dosha for predicting "difference of opinion, disagreement, dispute"

 

The section that has been appended later on in 1971 edition (starting from - To cause different of opinion ....) is for using Mars dosha for predicting difference of opinion, disagreement, disputes etc. Shri KSK himself clearly mentioned that any planet can do that. The study also proved the same point which Shri KSK has said. If you read my earlier email, I appreciated study for proving this point.

 

Though my point is that study didn't touch Mars dosha in marriage matching. Shri KSK said -

"It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise on the correct match."

 

It is clearly Shri KSK's opinion for using Mars dosha in "marriage matching" and not predicting on individual's horoscope. Point 1 (Mars dosha in marriage matching) was suggested by Shri KSK but not touched by study. My reason for writing the email was that people should not confuse that the study rejected both - mars dosha in prediction and mars dosha in marriage matching. The truth is that the study touched only mars dosha in prediction on individual's chart.

 

Generally Shri KSK was very truthful and blunt in calling a spade a spade. If he found that something is not working, he bluntly said that. Though when he says something to "weigh and consider various points of Mars Dosha", we should listen him till the time some study proves otherwise. We will have to wait for a study that checks bride and groom's chart simultaneously and conclude something. I hope now you got my point.

 

I do not have 1966 edition with me. Tw ji said that upto "It is, therefore, ..." is reprint of earlier edition of 1966. Which means "It is, therefore, ..." was the actual conclusion by Shri KSK and I do not think that there should be any doubt on it. He starts with that I'll tell you my opinion and finally he offers this opinion to "weigh and consider various points of Mars Dosha".

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

 

 

On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 11:27 PM, vgr pavan <vgr_pavan1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Punitji pranam,Pardon for interfering ....the qoute in reader 4 is

"To cause difference of opinion, disagreement, dispute, divorce etc. among the couple it is not left

to Mars alone, any planet can cause such undesirable effect provided

they happen to be deposited in such a position, that the sublord ofthe planet is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 or the sublord is

deposited in a constellation, the lord of which is the significatorof 6 or 10 or 12".Guruji , also stressed that "any planet can cause "such" undesirable effect , So he is telling

that we need not give preference to "Mars" alone , any planet can cause such results. Again in the next para" If the sub lord is mars or if it is in the constellation of mars , and if is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 , there will be separation. If it is saturn , silence and remain dumb-stick and strike. thus we have to predict."

here also he said "separation" will be caused by mars only when he is sublord or sub tenanted star lord and significator for 6,10,12. but not with mere placement of mars in various signs from asc, moon, venus.

[in P.no. 194 under the head "Divorce""there is no mars dosha in this chart because it is in a movable sign , it is debilitated ; conjoined with mercury . Yet look at the fate . thus taking the position of mars and offering predictions which appear more like a curse is not correct . but take the planets situated in the star or sub of mars in 1,2,4,8,12 ,. then , that planet tenanted in such a mars star will offer undesirable and disagreeable results.]

point no. 3 "Shri KSK clearly mentioned it for compatibility matching"i think you are pointing the para above the para given by me, it reads as follows:

"It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the correct match":

in the starting of this explanation on mars dosha P.no.55 KSK mentioned that : "Let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion. "

So i think that upto the above para (p.no. 69 ) is what Gurujis explanation about various rules and the later paragraphs are his "final" opinion.(which are last paras of the topic) .

point no.4 guruji explained what vedic astrological rules for "Mars Dosha " are . but not instructed us to follow the same. These are my opinions .......

Peace and Prosperity to All !!VGR --- On Sun, 6/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

 

@gro ups.com

 

 

Sunday, 6 December, 2009, 9:40 PM

 

 

Dear Tw ji,

 

1. Please tell clearly whether you are saying that 1966 is more authentic or 1971. I do not understand the reason for initial 6 points.

2. Even in 1971 edition, when we say that ".... it can not be left to Mars alone", it clearly means that Mars has impact, but it is not the "only" reason. Shri KSK were very clear about the impact of Mars dosha and that is the rason instead of rejecting it (which he has done quite often in readers for some other theories like Ashtakvarga) , he said that this is not the reason "alone."

3. Regarding point 7, the question is not whether everything is pre-destined or not. The question is whether it is correct to check Mars dosha on indiviaul's chart where Shri KSK clearly mentioned it for compatibility matching. Any conclusion drawn without considered both the partner's horoscope seems incomplete to me and against what Shri KSK has mentioned about it.

4. You also didn't answer my question, whether Moon and Venus were considered or not, apart from Ascendant, in the study? We must remember that Shri KSK clearly mentioned about inclusion of Moon and Venus with Ascendant while judging Mars dosha.

5. What ideas you are finding speculative? I am just quoting what Shri KSK has said and what proof you need more than what Shri KSK has said himself.

 

My objections and questions doesn't mean that I am try to belittle the study. The study is useful and establish that Mars dosha has limited or no value when it comes to predicting disagreement, dispute, and divorce etc. in marriage. It is a good and useful finding. Though the study doesn't tell anything about Mars dosha compatibility and we should be very clear about it. Most of the problems are said when Mars dosha doesn't match in bride and groom's chart and this is the utility of this theory in Hindu astrology (and Indian families). Also, in future study must be extended to include Moon and Venus, so that it can test the real definition of Mars dosha and not just an incomplete definition of Mars dosha. Till the time the scope of study is clear, people may confuse and think that Mars dosha is match making doesn't exist which is actually not convered in the study.

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 8:55 PM, TW <tw853 > wrote:

 

 

 

 

Dear Friends,

 

1. Mars dosha has been written in the KP Reader IV (Marriage, Married Life & Children) pages 51-69 (any Edition of reprinting). 2. Page 52, second and third parasOne may ask, "Why should they attach so much importance to the position of Mars alone? .......

The reply is that there are some people who unnessarily exaggerate the evil results of Mars.....3. Page 55, third paraLet me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion.

4. Page 69 fourth para It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise on the correct match.

5. Up to the above para is reprinted from the early writtings in the Krishnamurti Padhdhati Vol II, Sagar publications, 1966.6. Page 69 fourth to sixth paras are added in the mentioned KP Reader IV, first published in May 1971; fourth para is as given under:

To cause difference of opinion,disagreemen t, dispute, divorce etc. among the couple it is not left to Mars alone, any planet can cause such undesirable effect provided they happen to be deposited in such a position, that the sublord of the planet is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 or the sublord is deposited in a constellation, the lord of which is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12.

 

7. In KP, marriage matching, like education, occupation,death, is supposed to be predestined. 8. The speculative ideas would be sound, if and only if supported by a research study of sufficient numbers of charts other than here say experience or opinion.

 

Thanks and regards,

TW

 

@gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:>

 

 

 

 

 

> Dear Tw ji,> > I personally feel that the study missed few very basic but important points> and I would like to mention the same -> > 1. Problems due to Mars Dosha, tradionally as well as narrated by Shri KSK (

> http://logy. astrosage. com/mars- dosha), occurs only when the husband> and wife do not have same level of dosha. The problem exists only if a

> person having Mars dosha marries to the person who doesn't have Mars dosha> (even if we ignore level of dosha). The study seems to consider> only individual's chart and not two charts together. If it is studying

> only individual's chart, the study doesn't have much meaning. A study needs> to see Mars dosha in two situation and compare - a) mars dosha person> marriying to mars dosha person, b) mars dosha person not marring to Mars

> dosha person. Till the time we compare this two situation, how come we> conclude whether Mars Dosha works or not.> > 2. Traditonally as well as according to Shri KSK, Mars dosha should be> checked from Ascendant, Moon and Venus. It seems that study is considering

> only Ascedant and ignoring Moon and Venus. Again, if we do not follow the> definition properly, the conclusion reached can not be called correct.> > Here is the conclusion from your article -

> "It is to follow the KP rules only in considering longevity, matching,> separation, divorce, multi-marriage, happy or unhappy married life etc.> without mixing up with the traditional Manglik-to- Manglik matching rule and

> explain the public not to worry about Mars Dosha as suggested by Shri K.> Hariharan."> > Here again it seems that we are mixing up two things. KP does NOT provide> any tool for chart matching and Mars dosha is a tool for matching and not

> for prediction. KP clearly gives the rule for longevity etc., but doesn't> tell much about matching two charts. There is no doubt that KP is dependent> on traditional methods of horoscope matching as far as KP readers are

> concerned. This is the reason Koota as well as Mars dosha found place in KP.> In my opinion, the study is about Mars dosha as a predictive tool (which is> not discussed by Shri KSK) and NOT Mars dosha as a matching tool (which is

> discussed by Shri KSK).> > Thanks & Regards,> > Punit Pandey> >

> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:51 PM, TW tw853 wrote:> > >> >> > Dear Friends,> > What has been found is in the File section under:> > MARS DOSHA IN KP.doc

> > Regards,> > TW> >> >> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>, Punit

> > Pandey punitp@ wrote:> > >> > > Dear Friends,> > >> > > Here is what is found in third reader -> > >> > > http://logy. astrosage. com/mars- dosha

> > >> > > Thanks & Regards,> > >> > > Punit Pandey> > >> > >> > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Ramani kadavasalramani@ wrote:

> > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Shri Bansalj,> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Any kind of Mars Dosha including the Mars in 4th fron Lagna or Moon or

> > > > Venus gets cancelled when Mars is aspected by Saturn.> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Truly yours,> > > >> > > >

> > > >> > > > K.S.V.Ramani> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > ** @gro ups.com <%40. com>[

> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>] *On

> > > > Behalf Of *pankaj bansal> > > > *Sent:* 04 December 2009 22:50> > > >> > > > *To:* @gro ups.com <%40. com>

> > > > *Subject:* Re: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the> > years...> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >

> > > > Namaste Lajmiji,> > > >> > > > If Mars is placed In 4th house from> > > > Lagna & Venus and Placed in POORVASHADA Nakshatra(Venus) .Then there is No

> > So> > > > called Mars dosha and the Native Can Marriage anybody who had or had> > not> > > > mars dosha in this Birth Chart?Eagerly waiting for your precious> > response.

> > > >> > > > Thanks> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > ** Yogesh Lajmi yogeshlajmi@

> > > >> > > > *To:* @gro ups.com <%40. com>

 

 

 

 

> > > > *Cc:* Punit Pandey punitp@> > > > *Sent:* Fri, 4 December, 2009 8:05:18 PM> >> > > > *Subject:* MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Members,> > > >> > > > Not withstanding what has been averred by some "K.P.> > > > research scholars",

> > > >> > > > and whose research has been qestioned already in these columns by many> > KP> > > > followers,> > > >> > > > *and also,*my own experience about Mars Dosha,over the years,and after

> > > > analysing the charts of many a married couples,for marital> > > > problems,especially ,after marriage,I agree 100% with the observation> > in> > > > K.P. books that *Mars posited in Sun's star,or own star,and occuping

> > > > houses I,II,IV,VII, VIII & XII** **alone causes Mars Dosha**...*> > > >> > > > I invite the opinion of all members...on this very> > > > controversial matter,and I must add here that almost ALL of my clients

> > who> > > > come to consult me,strongly believe about the existence of Mars> > Dosha...so> > > > much so that they attribute almost every domestic problem to the> > existence

> > > > of Mars Dosha,and keep asking for *"remedies".. .* !> > > >> > > > Which I patiently have to explain in detail...based> > > > on their own experience in the practise of the K.P. System...

> > > >> > > > This is just to illustrate how deeply the ill-effects> > > > of Mars are embedded in the minds of people,at large...> > > >> > > > Am looking forward to comments from discerning

> > > > members...> > > >> > > > With kind regards,> > > >> > > > Yogesh Lajmi.> > > >> > > > * *> > > >

> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > Win 1 of 4 Sony home entertainment packs thanks to 7. Enter now<> > http://us.lrd. / _ylc=X3oDMTJxN2x 2ZmNpBF9zAzIwMjM 2MTY2MTMEdG1fZG1 lY2gDVGV4dCBMaW5 rBHRtX2xuawNVMTE wMzk3NwR0bV9uZXQ DWWFob28hBHRtX3B vcwN0YWdsaW5lBHR tX3BwdHkDYXVueg- -/SIG=14600t3ni/ **http%3A/ au.rd.. com/mail/ tagline/sony/ *http%3A/ au.docs.. com/homepageset/ %3Fp1=other% 26p2=au%26p3= mailtagline > > >> > > > .> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage<

> > http://in.rd. / tagline_yyi_ 1/*http:/ in.. com/>> > > > .> > > >

> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Dears Punit and Pavan,

The latest definition of Mars Dosha,as per K.P.,that I have, goes like this ... Mars Dosha is said to be present only if :"Mars in Sun's star,or it's own star,if posited in the Houses I,II,IV,VII,VIII & XII counted from Moon or Venus is said to cause Mars Dosha..."

One may ask as to,why should Mars be considered evil only when it signifies the Houses I,II,IV,VII,VIII & XII from Lagna,Moon or Venus ?

1) Lagna denotes health and longevity and personal characteristics. As Lagna will become a Maraka House to the VIIth, i.e., partner or wife...

2) The IInd house denotes the happiness of the Family,and domestic life,increase/decrease in the number of the Family by marriage and birth of children and death of children...

Further the IInd house is the VIIIth to the VIIth,showing danger to the partner...

3) The IVth house denotes domestic environments...Our Sages have declared that evil planets occupying the IVth or VIIIth from a Bhava spoils the Bhava...hence Mars on IV is eil to the Ascendant,i.e., to the health and belongings of the native...

4) The VIIth house shows the legal bondage,and the wife/husband of the native,in other words, the longevity of the native or his/her wife/husband...Hence the positioning of Mars in VII is not conducive to the health,longevity etc.,

5) The VIIIth house shows the difficultiesof the native and the finance and fortune of his/her partner...as well as their longevity...

6) The VIIIth is also known as the Mangalyasthana, i.e., the duration of the married life...again,therefore Mars in the VIIIth is evil...

7) The XIIth house stands for the real pleasure the partners derove,,the deception,loss etc...

The above explains the rationale of the houses being considered for the occupation by Mars,as evil...or MARS DOSHA... !

With the very best wishes,

Yogesh Lajmi

 

 

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp Sent: Tue, 8 December, 2009 5:29:10 PMRe: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

 

Dear Pavan ji,

 

// I still didnt understand what is the difference between mars dosha for compatibility and mars causing seperation. //

As you know marriage matching is used to decide upon the horoscope of bride or groom. How Mars dosha is used tradionally? Is it used on single horoscope?

 

Marriage matching is done on two charts. It is not about making some prediction for individual but composite study of impact of two horoscopes on each other. KP doesn't have any method for marriage matching in readers and hence we can see development of KPDP later.

 

//1.) Our Guruji gave preference to stars but not to the mere placement in a sign ,(like in vedic astrology). Even in star placements he went further and divided into sub divisions. He proved that the minute subdivisions are responsible in drastic changes in the lifes of the people born in the same place or twins.In this context how it will be logical to belive that KSK suggested us to verify mars dosha (which deals only with placement in a sign). //

Shri KSK also talked about mere placement of Saturn can cause Punarphoo (http://logy. astrosage. com/punarphoo). KP readers are full of such examples.

 

I agree it doesn't gel well with KP and I have written a seperate email about it. But it was Shri KSK's choice to include this article. Probably he found something important and that is the reason we find it in readers. His choice. Contradictions are nothing new in KP readers.

 

//3) why guruji suggested us to judge separately about longevity etc... If mars dosha can cause widowhood to either.//

You missed the point that the appended paragraphs were not conclusion. Please see my discussion with Tw ji and you will find that the conclusion is the paragraph where Shri KSK sugges weighing Mars Dosha in both the chart.

 

The appended line, as those apply on individual chart, doesn't say anything about Mars dosha in marriage matching. If you will read tradional astrology books, you will also find application of Mars dosha in individual's horoscope and it is rejected by Shri KSK. The same is also proven by the study.

 

//then how can we say that ksk advocated Kuja dosha analysis for match making.//

Shri KSK neither rejected nor advocated Mars dosha because he didn't have any alternate for marriage matching at that time. He simply shared his opinion and left it up to future development. Mars dosha is not alone there are many cases that he left untouched for future.

 

Now Mars dosha exists in Astro Secrets (as also shared by Lajmi ji) and KPDP. Again it is individual's choice to accept or reject it.

 

//therefore it is clear that KSK categorise Mars-dosha and stated his opinion only for those astrologers but not to his followers : //

It is your interpretion. He starts with "let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion" and at then end of the article he offers his opinion that "It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the correct match."

 

Now if we say that he referred astrologers to some other astrologers and not to his followers will be stretching it too far. He simply didn't have any alternate method of marriage matching and hence he draw that conclusion. Accept it or reject it is our choice, though it is the fact that KP readers do not offer any method for marriage matching. Lajmi ji vociferously advocate KPDP and I guess there are some other methods available as well if we see later KP literature. Need of KPDP tells absense of marriage matching method in KP.

 

What you are saying doesn't seem correct because of Shri KSK's nature of bluntly rejected the methods that doesn't work. He didn't reject it in the whole article. He is clearly recommending it to astrologers from above conclusion. Now assuming that these are some other astrologers and not KP followers, still he is recommending it to those astrologers and not rejecting it. I do not remember any other place in readers where Shri KSK has recommended some method to some astrologers and not to his followers. After all the readers are written for his followers and not for some other astrologers.

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:02 PM, vgr pavan <vgr_pavan1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Punitji Pranam,I still didnt understand what is the difference between mars dosha for compatibility and mars causing seperation.1.) Our Guruji gave preference to stars but not to the mere placement in a sign ,(like in vedic astrology). Even in star placements he went further and divided into sub divisions. He proved that the minute subdivisions are responsible in drastic changes in the lifes of the people born in the same place or twins.In this context how it will be logical to belive that KSK suggested us to verify mars dosha (which deals only with placement in a sign). 2) KSK in many instances told that every one has to face the good or bad events in his life based upon the meritorious deeds done in his previous birth and no chart has influence on others life. then how will be to think that mars placement in wifes chart will cause problems even though husbands chart indicating

hormonious wedded life !3) why guruji suggested us to judge separately about longevity etc... If mars dosha can cause widowhood to either.4) p.no. 52. Guruji stated as follows :One may ask, '"why should they attach too much importance to the position of mars alone ? we had never heard anybody taking of moon`s dosha or any other planet`s dosha or sun`s dosha or any other planets dosha . then does it mean that mars alone will do so much harm to the couple to the couple which other planets cannot do"?the reply is that there are some people who unnecessarily exaggerate the evil results of mars. Most of the following points are not taken into consideration he stated 20 points against kuja

dosha:then how can we say that ksk advocated Kuja dosha analysis for match making.the reason for the para by Guruji as shown by you is that (as i feel)in the starting of the concept p.no. 55 :"when parents attempt to fix the marriage of their sons and the daughters, the so called mars dosha , interpreted by astrologers according to their whims and fancies , confuses them due to varying opinion given by them." after few lines :"let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion ":thats why he divided mars-dosha into three groups and said the

anology of blood group (because ksk tries to say that we has to match the chart having kuja dosha with a chart having similar dosha but not the other two variants,) therefore it is clear that KSK categorise Mars-dosha and stated his opinion only for those astrologers but not to his followers : "It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the correct match"As per the mails of tinwinji i understood that the topic ended here, and later the last few paras were inserted So as to let the readers know how K.P. followers look at these "doshas" by taking only the sub-level significations and not the mere placement of mars in different signs.hope i am clear.i am not critising any one this iis what i understood about this concept.Guruji bless us all. Peace and Prosperity to All !!VGR

--- On Mon, 7/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...@gro ups.comMonday, 7 December, 2009, 12:50 AM

 

 

 

 

Dear Pavan ji,

 

It seem you are also mixing up two things. The Mars dosha section talks about two points -

1. Mars dosha for marriage matching

2. Mars dosha for predicting "difference of opinion, disagreement, dispute"

 

The section that has been appended later on in 1971 edition (starting from - To cause different of opinion ....) is for using Mars dosha for predicting difference of opinion, disagreement, disputes etc. Shri KSK himself clearly mentioned that any planet can do that. The study also proved the same point which Shri KSK has said. If you read my earlier email, I appreciated study for proving this point.

 

Though my point is that study didn't touch Mars dosha in marriage matching. Shri KSK said -

"It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise on the correct match."

 

It is clearly Shri KSK's opinion for using Mars dosha in "marriage matching" and not predicting on individual's horoscope. Point 1 (Mars dosha in marriage matching) was suggested by Shri KSK but not touched by study. My reason for writing the email was that people should not confuse that the study rejected both - mars dosha in prediction and mars dosha in marriage matching. The truth is that the study touched only mars dosha in prediction on individual's chart.

 

Generally Shri KSK was very truthful and blunt in calling a spade a spade. If he found that something is not working, he bluntly said that. Though when he says something to "weigh and consider various points of Mars Dosha", we should listen him till the time some study proves otherwise. We will have to wait for a study that checks bride and groom's chart simultaneously and conclude something. I hope now you got my point.

 

I do not have 1966 edition with me. Tw ji said that upto "It is, therefore, ..." is reprint of earlier edition of 1966. Which means "It is, therefore, ..." was the actual conclusion by Shri KSK and I do not think that there should be any doubt on it. He starts with that I'll tell you my opinion and finally he offers this opinion to "weigh and consider various points of Mars Dosha".

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

 

 

On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 11:27 PM, vgr pavan <vgr_pavan1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Punitji pranam,Pardon for interfering ....the qoute in reader 4 is

"To cause difference of opinion, disagreement, dispute, divorce etc. among the couple it is not leftto Mars alone, any planet can cause such undesirable effect providedthey happen to be deposited in such a position, that the sublord ofthe planet is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 or the sublord isdeposited in a constellation, the lord of which is the significatorof 6 or 10 or 12".Guruji , also stressed that "any planet can cause

"such" undesirable effect , So he is telling that we need not give preference to "Mars" alone , any planet can cause such results. Again in the next para" If the sub lord is mars or if it is in the constellation of mars , and if is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 , there will be separation. If it is saturn , silence and remain dumb-stick and strike. thus we have to predict." here also he said "separation" will be caused by mars only when he is sublord or sub tenanted star lord and significator for 6,10,12. but not with mere placement of mars in various signs from asc, moon, venus. [in P.no. 194 under the head "Divorce""there is no mars dosha in this chart because it is in a movable sign , it is debilitated ; conjoined with mercury . Yet look at the fate . thus taking the position of

mars and offering predictions which appear more like a curse is not correct . but take the planets situated in the star or sub of mars in 1,2,4,8,12 ,. then , that planet tenanted in such a mars star will offer undesirable and disagreeable results.] point no. 3 "Shri KSK clearly mentioned it for compatibility matching"i think you are pointing the para above the para given by me, it reads as follows: "It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the correct match": in the starting of this explanation on mars dosha P.no.55 KSK mentioned that : "Let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion. " So i think that upto the above para (p.no. 69 ) is what Gurujis explanation about various rules and the later paragraphs are his "final" opinion.(which are last paras of the topic) .point no.4 guruji explained what vedic astrological rules for "Mars Dosha " are . but not instructed us to follow the same. These are my opinions .......Peace and Prosperity to All !!VGR --- On Sun, 6/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

@gro ups.com

 

 

Sunday, 6 December, 2009, 9:40 PM

 

 

Dear Tw ji,

 

1. Please tell clearly whether you are saying that 1966 is more authentic or 1971. I do not understand the reason for initial 6 points.

2. Even in 1971 edition, when we say that ".... it can not be left to Mars alone", it clearly means that Mars has impact, but it is not the "only" reason. Shri KSK were very clear about the impact of Mars dosha and that is the rason instead of rejecting it (which he has done quite often in readers for some other theories like Ashtakvarga) , he said that this is not the reason "alone."

3. Regarding point 7, the question is not whether everything is pre-destined or not. The question is whether it is correct to check Mars dosha on indiviaul's chart where Shri KSK clearly mentioned it for compatibility matching. Any conclusion drawn without considered both the partner's horoscope seems incomplete to me and against what Shri KSK has mentioned about it.

4. You also didn't answer my question, whether Moon and Venus were considered or not, apart from Ascendant, in the study? We must remember that Shri KSK clearly mentioned about inclusion of Moon and Venus with Ascendant while judging Mars dosha.

5. What ideas you are finding speculative? I am just quoting what Shri KSK has said and what proof you need more than what Shri KSK has said himself.

 

My objections and questions doesn't mean that I am try to belittle the study. The study is useful and establish that Mars dosha has limited or no value when it comes to predicting disagreement, dispute, and divorce etc. in marriage. It is a good and useful finding. Though the study doesn't tell anything about Mars dosha compatibility and we should be very clear about it. Most of the problems are said when Mars dosha doesn't match in bride and groom's chart and this is the utility of this theory in Hindu astrology (and Indian families). Also, in future study must be extended to include Moon and Venus, so that it can test the real definition of Mars dosha and not just an incomplete definition of Mars dosha. Till the time the scope of study is clear, people may confuse and think that Mars dosha is match making doesn't exist which is actually not convered in the study.

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 8:55 PM, TW <tw853 > wrote:

 

 

 

 

Dear Friends,

 

1. Mars dosha has been written in the KP Reader IV (Marriage, Married Life & Children) pages 51-69 (any Edition of reprinting). 2. Page 52, second and third parasOne may ask, "Why should they attach so much importance to the position of Mars alone? .......The reply is that there are some people who unnessarily exaggerate the evil results of Mars.....3. Page 55, third paraLet me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion.4. Page 69 fourth para It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise on the correct match. 5. Up to the above para is reprinted from the early writtings in the Krishnamurti Padhdhati Vol II, Sagar publications, 1966.6. Page 69 fourth to sixth paras are added in the mentioned KP Reader IV, first published in May 1971; fourth para is as given under:To cause difference of opinion,disagreemen t, dispute, divorce etc. among the couple it is not left to Mars alone, any planet can cause such undesirable effect provided they happen to be deposited in such a position, that the sublord of the planet is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 or the sublord is deposited in a constellation, the lord of which is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12.

7. In KP, marriage matching, like education, occupation,death, is supposed to be predestined. 8. The speculative ideas would be sound, if and only if supported by a research study of sufficient numbers of charts other than here say experience or opinion.

 

Thanks and regards,

TW

 

@gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:>

 

 

 

 

 

> Dear Tw ji,> > I personally feel that the study missed few very basic but important points> and I would like to mention the same -> > 1. Problems due to Mars Dosha, tradionally as well as narrated by Shri KSK (> http://logy. astrosage. com/mars- dosha), occurs only when the husband> and wife do not have same level of dosha. The problem exists only if a> person having Mars dosha marries to the person who doesn't have Mars dosha> (even if we ignore level of dosha). The study seems to consider> only individual's chart and not two charts together. If it is studying> only individual's chart, the study doesn't have much meaning. A study needs> to see Mars dosha in two situation and compare - a) mars dosha person> marriying to mars dosha person, b) mars dosha person not

marring to Mars> dosha person. Till the time we compare this two situation, how come we> conclude whether Mars Dosha works or not.> > 2. Traditonally as well as according to Shri KSK, Mars dosha should be> checked from Ascendant, Moon and Venus. It seems that study is considering> only Ascedant and ignoring Moon and Venus. Again, if we do not follow the> definition properly, the conclusion reached can not be called correct.> > Here is the conclusion from your article -> "It is to follow the KP rules only in considering longevity, matching,> separation, divorce, multi-marriage, happy or unhappy married life etc.> without mixing up with the traditional Manglik-to- Manglik matching rule and> explain the public not to worry about Mars Dosha as suggested by Shri K.> Hariharan."> > Here again it seems that we are mixing up two things. KP does NOT

provide> any tool for chart matching and Mars dosha is a tool for matching and not> for prediction. KP clearly gives the rule for longevity etc., but doesn't> tell much about matching two charts. There is no doubt that KP is dependent> on traditional methods of horoscope matching as far as KP readers are> concerned. This is the reason Koota as well as Mars dosha found place in KP.> In my opinion, the study is about Mars dosha as a predictive tool (which is> not discussed by Shri KSK) and NOT Mars dosha as a matching tool (which is> discussed by Shri KSK).> > Thanks & Regards,> > Punit Pandey> >

> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:51 PM, TW tw853 wrote:> > >> >> > Dear Friends,> > What has been found is in the File section under:> > MARS DOSHA IN KP.doc> > Regards,> > TW> >> >> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>, Punit

> > Pandey punitp@ wrote:> > >> > > Dear Friends,> > >> > > Here is what is found in third reader -> > >> > > http://logy. astrosage. com/mars- dosha> > >> > > Thanks & Regards,> > >> > > Punit Pandey> > >> > >> > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Ramani kadavasalramani@ wrote:> > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Shri Bansalj,> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Any kind of Mars Dosha including the Mars in 4th fron Lagna or Moon or> > > > Venus gets cancelled when Mars is aspected by Saturn.> > > >> > > >> > >

>> > > > Truly yours,> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > K.S.V.Ramani> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > ** @gro ups.com <%40. com>[> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>] *On

> > > > Behalf Of *pankaj bansal> > > > *Sent:* 04 December 2009 22:50> > > >> > > > *To:* @gro ups.com <%40. com>

> > > > *Subject:* Re: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the> > years...> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Namaste Lajmiji,> > > >> > > > If Mars is placed In 4th house from> > > > Lagna & Venus and Placed in POORVASHADA Nakshatra(Venus) .Then there is No> > So> > > > called Mars dosha and the Native Can Marriage anybody who had or had> > not> > > > mars dosha in this Birth Chart?Eagerly waiting for your precious> > response.> > > >> > > > Thanks> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > ** Yogesh Lajmi yogeshlajmi@> > > >>

> > > *To:* @gro ups.com <%40. com>

 

 

 

 

> > > > *Cc:* Punit Pandey punitp@> > > > *Sent:* Fri, 4 December, 2009 8:05:18 PM> >> > > > *Subject:* MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Members,> > > >> > > > Not withstanding what has been averred by some "K.P.> > > > research scholars",> > > >> > > > and whose research has been qestioned already in these columns by many> > KP> > > > followers,> > > >> > > > *and also,*my own experience about Mars Dosha,over the years,and after> > > > analysing the charts of many a married couples,for marital> > > > problems,especially ,after marriage,I agree 100% with the observation> > in> > >

> K.P. books that *Mars posited in Sun's star,or own star,and occuping> > > > houses I,II,IV,VII, VIII & XII** **alone causes Mars Dosha**...*> > > >> > > > I invite the opinion of all members...on this very> > > > controversial matter,and I must add here that almost ALL of my clients> > who> > > > come to consult me,strongly believe about the existence of Mars> > Dosha...so> > > > much so that they attribute almost every domestic problem to the> > existence> > > > of Mars Dosha,and keep asking for *"remedies".. .* !> > > >> > > > Which I patiently have to explain in detail...based> > > > on their own experience in the practise of the K.P. System...> > > >> > > > This is just to illustrate how deeply the ill-effects> >

> > of Mars are embedded in the minds of people,at large...> > > >> > > > Am looking forward to comments from discerning> > > > members...> > > >> > > > With kind regards,> > > >> > > > Yogesh Lajmi.> > > >> > > > * *> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > Win 1 of 4 Sony home entertainment packs thanks to 7. Enter now<> > http://us.lrd. / _ylc=X3oDMTJxN2x 2ZmNpBF9zAzIwMjM 2MTY2MTMEdG1fZG1 lY2gDVGV4dCBMaW5 rBHRtX2xuawNVMTE wMzk3NwR0bV9uZXQ DWWFob28hBHRtX3B vcwN0YWdsaW5lBHR tX3BwdHkDYXVueg- -/SIG=14600t3ni/ **http%3A/ au.rd.. com/mail/ tagline/sony/ *http%3A/ au.docs.. com/homepageset/ %3Fp1=other% 26p2=au%26p3= mailtagline > > >> > > > .> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage<> > http://in.rd. / tagline_yyi_ 1/*http:/ in.. com/>> > > > .> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

 

 

 

 

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

 

 

 

See what's on at the movies in your area. Find out now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Thanks Sri Lajmi Ji for sharing this knowledge.

 

Does the aspect of Mars to the mentioned houses cause Dosha?

 

Regards

Gopal--- On Wed, 12/9/09, Yogesh Lajmi <yogeshlajmi wrote:

Yogesh Lajmi <yogeshlajmiRe: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years... Cc: "vgr pavan" <vgr_pavan1, "Punit Pandey" <punitp, "Gopalkrishnan Subra Iyer" <subragops3Wednesday, December 9, 2009, 10:08 PM

 

 

Dears Punit and Pavan,

The latest definition of Mars Dosha,as per K.P.,that I have, goes like this ... Mars Dosha is said to be present only if :"Mars in Sun's star,or it's own star,if posited in the Houses I,II,IV,VII,VIII & XII counted from Moon or Venus is said to cause Mars Dosha..."

One may ask as to,why should Mars be considered evil only when it signifies the Houses I,II,IV,VII,VIII & XII from Lagna,Moon or Venus ?

1) Lagna denotes health and longevity and personal characteristics. As Lagna will become a Maraka House to the VIIth, i.e., partner or wife...

2) The IInd house denotes the happiness of the Family,and domestic life,increase/decrease in the number of the Family by marriage and birth of children and death of children...

Further the IInd house is the VIIIth to the VIIth,showing danger to the partner...

3) The IVth house denotes domestic environments...Our Sages have declared that evil planets occupying the IVth or VIIIth from a Bhava spoils the Bhava...hence Mars on IV is eil to the Ascendant,i.e., to the health and belongings of the native...

4) The VIIth house shows the legal bondage,and the wife/husband of the native,in other words, the longevity of the native or his/her wife/husband...Hence the positioning of Mars in VII is not conducive to the health,longevity etc.,

5) The VIIIth house shows the difficultiesof the native and the finance and fortune of his/her partner...as well as their longevity...

6) The VIIIth is also known as the Mangalyasthana, i.e., the duration of the married life...again,therefore Mars in the VIIIth is evil...

7) The XIIth house stands for the real pleasure the partners derove,,the deception,loss etc...

The above explains the rationale of the houses being considered for the occupation by Mars,as evil...or MARS DOSHA... !

With the very best wishes,

Yogesh Lajmi

 

 

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp Sent: Tue, 8 December, 2009 5:29:10 PMRe: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

 

 

Dear Pavan ji,

 

// I still didnt understand what is the difference between mars dosha for compatibility and mars causing seperation. //

As you know marriage matching is used to decide upon the horoscope of bride or groom. How Mars dosha is used tradionally? Is it used on single horoscope?

 

Marriage matching is done on two charts. It is not about making some prediction for individual but composite study of impact of two horoscopes on each other. KP doesn't have any method for marriage matching in readers and hence we can see development of KPDP later.

 

//1.) Our Guruji gave preference to stars but not to the mere placement in a sign ,(like in vedic astrology). Even in star placements he went further and divided into sub divisions. He proved that the minute subdivisions are responsible in drastic changes in the lifes of the people born in the same place or twins.In this context how it will be logical to belive that KSK suggested us to verify mars dosha (which deals only with placement in a sign). //

Shri KSK also talked about mere placement of Saturn can cause Punarphoo (http://logy. astrosage. com/punarphoo). KP readers are full of such examples.

 

I agree it doesn't gel well with KP and I have written a seperate email about it. But it was Shri KSK's choice to include this article. Probably he found something important and that is the reason we find it in readers. His choice. Contradictions are nothing new in KP readers.

 

//3) why guruji suggested us to judge separately about longevity etc... If mars dosha can cause widowhood to either.//

You missed the point that the appended paragraphs were not conclusion. Please see my discussion with Tw ji and you will find that the conclusion is the paragraph where Shri KSK sugges weighing Mars Dosha in both the chart.

 

The appended line, as those apply on individual chart, doesn't say anything about Mars dosha in marriage matching. If you will read tradional astrology books, you will also find application of Mars dosha in individual's horoscope and it is rejected by Shri KSK. The same is also proven by the study.

 

//then how can we say that ksk advocated Kuja dosha analysis for match making.//

Shri KSK neither rejected nor advocated Mars dosha because he didn't have any alternate for marriage matching at that time. He simply shared his opinion and left it up to future development. Mars dosha is not alone there are many cases that he left untouched for future.

 

Now Mars dosha exists in Astro Secrets (as also shared by Lajmi ji) and KPDP. Again it is individual's choice to accept or reject it.

 

//therefore it is clear that KSK categorise Mars-dosha and stated his opinion only for those astrologers but not to his followers : //

It is your interpretion. He starts with "let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion" and at then end of the article he offers his opinion that "It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the correct match."

 

Now if we say that he referred astrologers to some other astrologers and not to his followers will be stretching it too far. He simply didn't have any alternate method of marriage matching and hence he draw that conclusion. Accept it or reject it is our choice, though it is the fact that KP readers do not offer any method for marriage matching. Lajmi ji vociferously advocate KPDP and I guess there are some other methods available as well if we see later KP literature. Need of KPDP tells absense of marriage matching method in KP.

 

What you are saying doesn't seem correct because of Shri KSK's nature of bluntly rejected the methods that doesn't work. He didn't reject it in the whole article. He is clearly recommending it to astrologers from above conclusion. Now assuming that these are some other astrologers and not KP followers, still he is recommending it to those astrologers and not rejecting it. I do not remember any other place in readers where Shri KSK has recommended some method to some astrologers and not to his followers. After all the readers are written for his followers and not for some other astrologers.

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:02 PM, vgr pavan <vgr_pavan1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Punitji Pranam,I still didnt understand what is the difference between mars dosha for compatibility and mars causing seperation.1.) Our Guruji gave preference to stars but not to the mere placement in a sign ,(like in vedic astrology). Even in star placements he went further and divided into sub divisions. He proved that the minute subdivisions are responsible in drastic changes in the lifes of the people born in the same place or twins.In this context how it will be logical to belive that KSK suggested us to verify mars dosha (which deals only with placement in a sign). 2) KSK in many instances told that every one has to face the good or bad events in his life based upon the meritorious deeds done in his previous birth and no chart has influence on others life. then how will be to think that mars placement in wifes chart will cause problems even though husbands chart indicating

hormonious wedded life !3) why guruji suggested us to judge separately about longevity etc... If mars dosha can cause widowhood to either.4) p.no. 52. Guruji stated as follows :One may ask, '"why should they attach too much importance to the position of mars alone ? we had never heard anybody taking of moon`s dosha or any other planet`s dosha or sun`s dosha or any other planets dosha . then does it mean that mars alone will do so much harm to the couple to the couple which other planets cannot do"?the reply is that there are some people who unnecessarily exaggerate the evil results of mars. Most of the following points are not taken into consideration he stated 20 points against kuja

dosha:then how can we say that ksk advocated Kuja dosha analysis for match making.the reason for the para by Guruji as shown by you is that (as i feel)in the starting of the concept p.no. 55 :"when parents attempt to fix the marriage of their sons and the daughters, the so called mars dosha , interpreted by astrologers according to their whims and fancies , confuses them due to varying opinion given by them." after few lines :"let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion ":thats why he divided mars-dosha into three groups and said the

anology of blood group (because ksk tries to say that we has to match the chart having kuja dosha with a chart having similar dosha but not the other two variants,) therefore it is clear that KSK categorise Mars-dosha and stated his opinion only for those astrologers but not to his followers : "It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the correct match"As per the mails of tinwinji i understood that the topic ended here, and later the last few paras were inserted So as to let the readers know how K.P. followers look at these "doshas" by taking only the sub-level significations and not the mere placement of mars in different signs.hope i am clear.i am not critising any one this iis what i understood about this concept.Guruji bless us all. Peace and Prosperity to All !!VGR

--- On Mon, 7/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...@gro ups.comMonday, 7 December, 2009, 12:50 AM

 

 

 

 

Dear Pavan ji,

 

It seem you are also mixing up two things. The Mars dosha section talks about two points -

1. Mars dosha for marriage matching

2. Mars dosha for predicting "difference of opinion, disagreement, dispute"

 

The section that has been appended later on in 1971 edition (starting from - To cause different of opinion ....) is for using Mars dosha for predicting difference of opinion, disagreement, disputes etc. Shri KSK himself clearly mentioned that any planet can do that. The study also proved the same point which Shri KSK has said. If you read my earlier email, I appreciated study for proving this point.

 

Though my point is that study didn't touch Mars dosha in marriage matching. Shri KSK said -

"It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise on the correct match."

 

It is clearly Shri KSK's opinion for using Mars dosha in "marriage matching" and not predicting on individual's horoscope. Point 1 (Mars dosha in marriage matching) was suggested by Shri KSK but not touched by study. My reason for writing the email was that people should not confuse that the study rejected both - mars dosha in prediction and mars dosha in marriage matching. The truth is that the study touched only mars dosha in prediction on individual's chart.

 

Generally Shri KSK was very truthful and blunt in calling a spade a spade. If he found that something is not working, he bluntly said that. Though when he says something to "weigh and consider various points of Mars Dosha", we should listen him till the time some study proves otherwise. We will have to wait for a study that checks bride and groom's chart simultaneously and conclude something. I hope now you got my point.

 

I do not have 1966 edition with me. Tw ji said that upto "It is, therefore, ..." is reprint of earlier edition of 1966. Which means "It is, therefore, ..." was the actual conclusion by Shri KSK and I do not think that there should be any doubt on it. He starts with that I'll tell you my opinion and finally he offers this opinion to "weigh and consider various points of Mars Dosha".

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

 

 

On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 11:27 PM, vgr pavan <vgr_pavan1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Punitji pranam,Pardon for interfering ....the qoute in reader 4 is

"To cause difference of opinion, disagreement, dispute, divorce etc. among the couple it is not leftto Mars alone, any planet can cause such undesirable effect providedthey happen to be deposited in such a position, that the sublord ofthe planet is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 or the sublord isdeposited in a constellation, the lord of which is the significatorof 6 or 10 or 12".Guruji , also stressed that "any planet can cause

"such" undesirable effect , So he is telling that we need not give preference to "Mars" alone , any planet can cause such results. Again in the next para" If the sub lord is mars or if it is in the constellation of mars , and if is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 , there will be separation. If it is saturn , silence and remain dumb-stick and strike. thus we have to predict." here also he said "separation" will be caused by mars only when he is sublord or sub tenanted star lord and significator for 6,10,12. but not with mere placement of mars in various signs from asc, moon, venus. [in P.no. 194 under the head "Divorce""there is no mars dosha in this chart because it is in a movable sign , it is debilitated ; conjoined with mercury . Yet look at the fate . thus taking the position of

mars and offering predictions which appear more like a curse is not correct . but take the planets situated in the star or sub of mars in 1,2,4,8,12 ,. then , that planet tenanted in such a mars star will offer undesirable and disagreeable results.] point no. 3 "Shri KSK clearly mentioned it for compatibility matching"i think you are pointing the para above the para given by me, it reads as follows: "It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the correct match": in the starting of this explanation on mars dosha P.no.55 KSK mentioned that : "Let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion. " So i think that upto the above para (p.no. 69 ) is what Gurujis explanation about various rules and the later paragraphs are his "final" opinion.(which are last paras of the topic) .point no.4 guruji explained what vedic astrological rules for "Mars Dosha " are . but not instructed us to follow the same. These are my opinions .......Peace and Prosperity to All !!VGR --- On Sun, 6/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

@gro ups.com

 

 

Sunday, 6 December, 2009, 9:40 PM

 

 

Dear Tw ji,

 

1. Please tell clearly whether you are saying that 1966 is more authentic or 1971. I do not understand the reason for initial 6 points.

2. Even in 1971 edition, when we say that ".... it can not be left to Mars alone", it clearly means that Mars has impact, but it is not the "only" reason. Shri KSK were very clear about the impact of Mars dosha and that is the rason instead of rejecting it (which he has done quite often in readers for some other theories like Ashtakvarga) , he said that this is not the reason "alone."

3. Regarding point 7, the question is not whether everything is pre-destined or not. The question is whether it is correct to check Mars dosha on indiviaul's chart where Shri KSK clearly mentioned it for compatibility matching. Any conclusion drawn without considered both the partner's horoscope seems incomplete to me and against what Shri KSK has mentioned about it.

4. You also didn't answer my question, whether Moon and Venus were considered or not, apart from Ascendant, in the study? We must remember that Shri KSK clearly mentioned about inclusion of Moon and Venus with Ascendant while judging Mars dosha.

5. What ideas you are finding speculative? I am just quoting what Shri KSK has said and what proof you need more than what Shri KSK has said himself.

 

My objections and questions doesn't mean that I am try to belittle the study. The study is useful and establish that Mars dosha has limited or no value when it comes to predicting disagreement, dispute, and divorce etc. in marriage. It is a good and useful finding. Though the study doesn't tell anything about Mars dosha compatibility and we should be very clear about it. Most of the problems are said when Mars dosha doesn't match in bride and groom's chart and this is the utility of this theory in Hindu astrology (and Indian families). Also, in future study must be extended to include Moon and Venus, so that it can test the real definition of Mars dosha and not just an incomplete definition of Mars dosha. Till the time the scope of study is clear, people may confuse and think that Mars dosha is match making doesn't exist which is actually not convered in the study.

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 8:55 PM, TW <tw853 > wrote:

 

 

 

 

Dear Friends,

 

1. Mars dosha has been written in the KP Reader IV (Marriage, Married Life & Children) pages 51-69 (any Edition of reprinting). 2. Page 52, second and third parasOne may ask, "Why should they attach so much importance to the position of Mars alone? .......The reply is that there are some people who unnessarily exaggerate the evil results of Mars.....3. Page 55, third paraLet me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion.4. Page 69 fourth para It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise on the correct match. 5. Up to the above para is reprinted from the early writtings in the Krishnamurti Padhdhati Vol II, Sagar publications, 1966.6. Page 69 fourth to sixth paras are added in the mentioned KP Reader IV, first published in May 1971; fourth para is as given under:To cause difference of opinion,disagreemen t, dispute, divorce etc. among the couple it is not left to Mars alone, any planet can cause such undesirable effect provided they happen to be deposited in such a position, that the sublord of the planet is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 or the sublord is deposited in a constellation, the lord of which is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12.

7. In KP, marriage matching, like education, occupation,death, is supposed to be predestined. 8. The speculative ideas would be sound, if and only if supported by a research study of sufficient numbers of charts other than here say experience or opinion.

 

Thanks and regards,

TW

 

@gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:>

 

 

 

 

 

> Dear Tw ji,> > I personally feel that the study missed few very basic but important points> and I would like to mention the same -> > 1. Problems due to Mars Dosha, tradionally as well as narrated by Shri KSK (> http://logy. astrosage. com/mars- dosha), occurs only when the husband> and wife do not have same level of dosha. The problem exists only if a> person having Mars dosha marries to the person who doesn't have Mars dosha> (even if we ignore level of dosha). The study seems to consider> only individual's chart and not two charts together. If it is studying> only individual's chart, the study doesn't have much meaning. A study needs> to see Mars dosha in two situation and compare - a) mars dosha person> marriying to mars dosha person, b) mars dosha person not

marring to Mars> dosha person. Till the time we compare this two situation, how come we> conclude whether Mars Dosha works or not.> > 2. Traditonally as well as according to Shri KSK, Mars dosha should be> checked from Ascendant, Moon and Venus. It seems that study is considering> only Ascedant and ignoring Moon and Venus. Again, if we do not follow the> definition properly, the conclusion reached can not be called correct.> > Here is the conclusion from your article -> "It is to follow the KP rules only in considering longevity, matching,> separation, divorce, multi-marriage, happy or unhappy married life etc.> without mixing up with the traditional Manglik-to- Manglik matching rule and> explain the public not to worry about Mars Dosha as suggested by Shri K.> Hariharan."> > Here again it seems that we are mixing up two things. KP does NOT

provide> any tool for chart matching and Mars dosha is a tool for matching and not> for prediction. KP clearly gives the rule for longevity etc., but doesn't> tell much about matching two charts. There is no doubt that KP is dependent> on traditional methods of horoscope matching as far as KP readers are> concerned. This is the reason Koota as well as Mars dosha found place in KP.> In my opinion, the study is about Mars dosha as a predictive tool (which is> not discussed by Shri KSK) and NOT Mars dosha as a matching tool (which is> discussed by Shri KSK).> > Thanks & Regards,> > Punit Pandey> >

> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:51 PM, TW tw853 wrote:> > >> >> > Dear Friends,> > What has been found is in the File section under:> > MARS DOSHA IN KP.doc> > Regards,> > TW> >> >> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>, Punit

> > Pandey punitp@ wrote:> > >> > > Dear Friends,> > >> > > Here is what is found in third reader -> > >> > > http://logy. astrosage. com/mars- dosha> > >> > > Thanks & Regards,> > >> > > Punit Pandey> > >> > >> > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Ramani kadavasalramani@ wrote:> > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Shri Bansalj,> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Any kind of Mars Dosha including the Mars in 4th fron Lagna or Moon or> > > > Venus gets cancelled when Mars is aspected by Saturn.> > > >> > > >> > >

>> > > > Truly yours,> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > K.S.V.Ramani> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > ** @gro ups.com <%40. com>[> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>] *On

> > > > Behalf Of *pankaj bansal> > > > *Sent:* 04 December 2009 22:50> > > >> > > > *To:* @gro ups.com <%40. com>

> > > > *Subject:* Re: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the> > years...> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Namaste Lajmiji,> > > >> > > > If Mars is placed In 4th house from> > > > Lagna & Venus and Placed in POORVASHADA Nakshatra(Venus) .Then there is No> > So> > > > called Mars dosha and the Native Can Marriage anybody who had or had> > not> > > > mars dosha in this Birth Chart?Eagerly waiting for your precious> > response.> > > >> > > > Thanks> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > ** Yogesh Lajmi yogeshlajmi@> > > >>

> > > *To:* @gro ups.com <%40. com>

 

 

 

 

> > > > *Cc:* Punit Pandey punitp@> > > > *Sent:* Fri, 4 December, 2009 8:05:18 PM> >> > > > *Subject:* MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Members,> > > >> > > > Not withstanding what has been averred by some "K.P.> > > > research scholars",> > > >> > > > and whose research has been qestioned already in these columns by many> > KP> > > > followers,> > > >> > > > *and also,*my own experience about Mars Dosha,over the years,and after> > > > analysing the charts of many a married couples,for marital> > > > problems,especially ,after marriage,I agree 100% with the observation> > in> > >

> K.P. books that *Mars posited in Sun's star,or own star,and occuping> > > > houses I,II,IV,VII, VIII & XII** **alone causes Mars Dosha**...*> > > >> > > > I invite the opinion of all members...on this very> > > > controversial matter,and I must add here that almost ALL of my clients> > who> > > > come to consult me,strongly believe about the existence of Mars> > Dosha...so> > > > much so that they attribute almost every domestic problem to the> > existence> > > > of Mars Dosha,and keep asking for *"remedies".. .* !> > > >> > > > Which I patiently have to explain in detail...based> > > > on their own experience in the practise of the K.P. System...> > > >> > > > This is just to illustrate how deeply the ill-effects> >

> > of Mars are embedded in the minds of people,at large...> > > >> > > > Am looking forward to comments from discerning> > > > members...> > > >> > > > With kind regards,> > > >> > > > Yogesh Lajmi.> > > >> > > > * *> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > Win 1 of 4 Sony home entertainment packs thanks to 7. Enter now<> > http://us.lrd. / _ylc=X3oDMTJxN2x 2ZmNpBF9zAzIwMjM 2MTY2MTMEdG1fZG1 lY2gDVGV4dCBMaW5 rBHRtX2xuawNVMTE wMzk3NwR0bV9uZXQ DWWFob28hBHRtX3B vcwN0YWdsaW5lBHR tX3BwdHkDYXVueg- -/SIG=14600t3ni/ **http%3A/ au.rd.. com/mail/ tagline/sony/ *http%3A/ au.docs.. com/homepageset/ %3Fp1=other% 26p2=au%26p3= mailtagline > > >> > > > .> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage<> > http://in.rd. / tagline_yyi_ 1/*http:/ in.. com/>> > > > .> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

 

 

 

 

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

 

 

 

See what's on at the movies in your area. Find out now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

dear sir,

for mars dosha it is to be studied whether mars in friendly sign or enemy sign.The dosha gets mitigated if the fiery nature is dialuted by its placement in such signs.According to kp starlord and sublord

gains importance so if mars even though not in 1,4,7,8and 12 from lagna,moon or venus but connected

to these houses by starlord/sublord may be considerd as mars dosha.

please comment

shrikant_jinral

 

 

 

pankaj bansal <pankaj_bansal19 Sent: Fri, 4 December, 2009 10:49:40 PMRe: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

 

 

Namaste Lajmiji, If Mars is placed In 4th house from Lagna & Venus and Placed in POORVASHADA Nakshatra(Venus) .Then there is No So called Mars dosha and the Native Can Marriage anybody who had or had not mars dosha in this Birth Chart?Eagerly waiting for your precious response. Thanks

 

 

 

Yogesh Lajmi <yogeshlajmi@ >@gro ups.comCc: Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Fri, 4 December, 2009 8:05:18 PM MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Members,

Not withstanding what has been averred by some "K.P. research scholars",

and whose research has been qestioned already in these columns by many KP followers,

and also,my own experience about Mars Dosha,over the years,and after analysing the charts of many a married couples,for marital problems,especially ,after marriage,I agree 100% with the observation in K.P. books that Mars posited in Sun's star,or own star,and occuping houses I,II,IV,VII, VIII & XII alone causes Mars Dosha...

I invite the opinion of all members...on this very controversial matter,and I must add here that almost ALL of my clients who come to consult me,strongly believe about the existence of Mars Dosha...so much so that they attribute almost every domestic problem to the existence of Mars Dosha,and keep asking for "remedies".. . !

Which I patiently have to explain in detail...based on their own experience in the practise of the K.P. System...

This is just to illustrate how deeply the ill-effects of Mars are embedded in the minds of people,at large...

Am looking forward to comments from discerning members...

With kind regards,

Yogesh Lajmi.

 

Win 1 of 4 Sony home entertainment packs thanks to 7. Enter now.

 

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Dear Shrikant,

As per K.P., there is no need...just follow the rules given...

With best wishes,

Yogesh Lajmi.

 

 

 

j shrikant <shrikantjin Cc: punit pandey <punitpThu, 10 December, 2009 9:50:58 AMRe: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

 

 

dear sir,

for mars dosha it is to be studied whether mars in friendly sign or enemy sign.The dosha gets mitigated if the fiery nature is dialuted by its placement in such signs.According to kp starlord and sublord

gains importance so if mars even though not in 1,4,7,8and 12 from lagna,moon or venus but connected

to these houses by starlord/sublord may be considerd as mars dosha.

please comment

shrikant_jinral@ rediffmail. com

 

 

 

pankaj bansal <pankaj_bansal19@ >@gro ups.comFri, 4 December, 2009 10:49:40 PMRe: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

 

 

Namaste Lajmiji, If Mars is placed In 4th house from Lagna & Venus and Placed in POORVASHADA Nakshatra(Venus) .Then there is No So called Mars dosha and the Native Can Marriage anybody who had or had not mars dosha in this Birth Chart?Eagerly waiting for your precious response. Thanks

 

 

 

Yogesh Lajmi <yogeshlajmi@ >@gro ups.comCc: Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Fri, 4 December, 2009 8:05:18 PM MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Members,

Not withstanding what has been averred by some "K.P. research scholars",

and whose research has been qestioned already in these columns by many KP followers,

and also,my own experience about Mars Dosha,over the years,and after analysing the charts of many a married couples,for marital problems,especially ,after marriage,I agree 100% with the observation in K.P. books that Mars posited in Sun's star,or own star,and occuping houses I,II,IV,VII, VIII & XII alone causes Mars Dosha...

I invite the opinion of all members...on this very controversial matter,and I must add here that almost ALL of my clients who come to consult me,strongly believe about the existence of Mars Dosha...so much so that they attribute almost every domestic problem to the existence of Mars Dosha,and keep asking for "remedies".. . !

Which I patiently have to explain in detail...based on their own experience in the practise of the K.P. System...

This is just to illustrate how deeply the ill-effects of Mars are embedded in the minds of people,at large...

Am looking forward to comments from discerning members...

With kind regards,

Yogesh Lajmi.

 

Win 1 of 4 Sony home entertainment packs thanks to 7. Enter now.

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

 

See what's on at the movies in your area. Find out now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Dear Gopal,

Haven't I clearly used the words...only if... ? ?

You seem to have developed the habit of 'reading' what is not written...!

With best wishes,

Yogesh Lajmi.

 

 

 

Gopalakrishnan Subra Iyer <subragops3 ; Yogesh Lajmi <yogeshlajmiCc: vgr pavan <vgr_pavan1; Punit Pandey <punitpThu, 10 December, 2009 9:38:35 AMRe: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

 

 

 

 

 

Thanks Sri Lajmi Ji for sharing this knowledge.

 

Does the aspect of Mars to the mentioned houses cause Dosha?

 

Regards

Gopal--- On Wed, 12/9/09, Yogesh Lajmi <yogeshlajmi@ > wrote:

Yogesh Lajmi <yogeshlajmi@ >Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...@gro ups.comCc: "vgr pavan" <vgr_pavan1 (AT) (DOT) co.in>, "Punit Pandey" <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>, "Gopalkrishnan Subra Iyer" <subragops3 >Wednesday, December 9, 2009, 10:08 PM

 

 

Dears Punit and Pavan,

The latest definition of Mars Dosha,as per K.P.,that I have, goes like this ... Mars Dosha is said to be present only if :"Mars in Sun's star,or it's own star,if posited in the Houses I,II,IV,VII, VIII & XII counted from Moon or Venus is said to cause Mars Dosha..."

One may ask as to,why should Mars be considered evil only when it signifies the Houses I,II,IV,VII, VIII & XII from Lagna,Moon or Venus ?

1) Lagna denotes health and longevity and personal characteristics. As Lagna will become a Maraka House to the VIIth, i.e., partner or wife...

2) The IInd house denotes the happiness of the Family,and domestic life,increase/ decrease in the number of the Family by marriage and birth of children and death of children...

Further the IInd house is the VIIIth to the VIIth,showing danger to the partner...

3) The IVth house denotes domestic environments. ..Our Sages have declared that evil planets occupying the IVth or VIIIth from a Bhava spoils the Bhava...hence Mars on IV is eil to the Ascendant,i. e., to the health and belongings of the native...

4) The VIIth house shows the legal bondage,and the wife/husband of the native,in other words, the longevity of the native or his/her wife/husband. ..Hence the positioning of Mars in VII is not conducive to the health,longevity etc.,

5) The VIIIth house shows the difficultiesof the native and the finance and fortune of his/her partner...as well as their longevity...

6) The VIIIth is also known as the Mangalyasthana, i.e., the duration of the married life...again, therefore Mars in the VIIIth is evil...

7) The XIIth house stands for the real pleasure the partners derove,,the deception,loss etc...

The above explains the rationale of the houses being considered for the occupation by Mars,as evil...or MARS DOSHA... !

With the very best wishes,

Yogesh Lajmi

 

 

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>@gro ups.comTue, 8 December, 2009 5:29:10 PMRe: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

 

Dear Pavan ji,

 

// I still didnt understand what is the difference between mars dosha for compatibility and mars causing seperation. //

As you know marriage matching is used to decide upon the horoscope of bride or groom. How Mars dosha is used tradionally? Is it used on single horoscope?

 

Marriage matching is done on two charts. It is not about making some prediction for individual but composite study of impact of two horoscopes on each other. KP doesn't have any method for marriage matching in readers and hence we can see development of KPDP later.

 

//1.) Our Guruji gave preference to stars but not to the mere placement in a sign ,(like in vedic astrology). Even in star placements he went further and divided into sub divisions. He proved that the minute subdivisions are responsible in drastic changes in the lifes of the people born in the same place or twins.In this context how it will be logical to belive that KSK suggested us to verify mars dosha (which deals only with placement in a sign). //

Shri KSK also talked about mere placement of Saturn can cause Punarphoo (http://logy. astrosage. com/punarphoo). KP readers are full of such examples.

 

I agree it doesn't gel well with KP and I have written a seperate email about it. But it was Shri KSK's choice to include this article. Probably he found something important and that is the reason we find it in readers. His choice. Contradictions are nothing new in KP readers.

 

//3) why guruji suggested us to judge separately about longevity etc... If mars dosha can cause widowhood to either.//

You missed the point that the appended paragraphs were not conclusion. Please see my discussion with Tw ji and you will find that the conclusion is the paragraph where Shri KSK sugges weighing Mars Dosha in both the chart.

 

The appended line, as those apply on individual chart, doesn't say anything about Mars dosha in marriage matching. If you will read tradional astrology books, you will also find application of Mars dosha in individual's horoscope and it is rejected by Shri KSK. The same is also proven by the study.

 

//then how can we say that ksk advocated Kuja dosha analysis for match making.//

Shri KSK neither rejected nor advocated Mars dosha because he didn't have any alternate for marriage matching at that time. He simply shared his opinion and left it up to future development. Mars dosha is not alone there are many cases that he left untouched for future.

 

Now Mars dosha exists in Astro Secrets (as also shared by Lajmi ji) and KPDP. Again it is individual's choice to accept or reject it.

 

//therefore it is clear that KSK categorise Mars-dosha and stated his opinion only for those astrologers but not to his followers : //

It is your interpretion. He starts with "let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion" and at then end of the article he offers his opinion that "It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the correct match."

 

Now if we say that he referred astrologers to some other astrologers and not to his followers will be stretching it too far. He simply didn't have any alternate method of marriage matching and hence he draw that conclusion. Accept it or reject it is our choice, though it is the fact that KP readers do not offer any method for marriage matching. Lajmi ji vociferously advocate KPDP and I guess there are some other methods available as well if we see later KP literature. Need of KPDP tells absense of marriage matching method in KP.

 

What you are saying doesn't seem correct because of Shri KSK's nature of bluntly rejected the methods that doesn't work. He didn't reject it in the whole article. He is clearly recommending it to astrologers from above conclusion. Now assuming that these are some other astrologers and not KP followers, still he is recommending it to those astrologers and not rejecting it. I do not remember any other place in readers where Shri KSK has recommended some method to some astrologers and not to his followers. After all the readers are written for his followers and not for some other astrologers.

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:02 PM, vgr pavan <vgr_pavan1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Punitji Pranam,I still didnt understand what is the difference between mars dosha for compatibility and mars causing seperation.1.) Our Guruji gave preference to stars but not to the mere placement in a sign ,(like in vedic astrology). Even in star placements he went further and divided into sub divisions. He proved that the minute subdivisions are responsible in drastic changes in the lifes of the people born in the same place or twins.In this context how it will be logical to belive that KSK suggested us to verify mars dosha (which deals only with placement in a sign). 2) KSK in many instances told that every one has to face the good or bad events in his life based upon the meritorious deeds done in his previous birth and no chart has influence on others life. then how will be to think that mars placement in wifes chart will cause problems even though husbands chart indicating

hormonious wedded life !3) why guruji suggested us to judge separately about longevity etc... If mars dosha can cause widowhood to either.4) p.no. 52. Guruji stated as follows :One may ask, '"why should they attach too much importance to the position of mars alone ? we had never heard anybody taking of moon`s dosha or any other planet`s dosha or sun`s dosha or any other planets dosha . then does it mean that mars alone will do so much harm to the couple to the couple which other planets cannot do"?the reply is that there are some people who unnecessarily exaggerate the evil results of mars. Most of the following points are not taken into consideration he stated 20 points against kuja

dosha:then how can we say that ksk advocated Kuja dosha analysis for match making.the reason for the para by Guruji as shown by you is that (as i feel)in the starting of the concept p.no. 55 :"when parents attempt to fix the marriage of their sons and the daughters, the so called mars dosha , interpreted by astrologers according to their whims and fancies , confuses them due to varying opinion given by them." after few lines :"let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion ":thats why he divided mars-dosha into three groups and said the

anology of blood group (because ksk tries to say that we has to match the chart having kuja dosha with a chart having similar dosha but not the other two variants,) therefore it is clear that KSK categorise Mars-dosha and stated his opinion only for those astrologers but not to his followers : "It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the correct match"As per the mails of tinwinji i understood that the topic ended here, and later the last few paras were inserted So as to let the readers know how K.P. followers look at these "doshas" by taking only the sub-level significations and not the mere placement of mars in different signs.hope i am clear.i am not critising any one this iis what i understood about this concept.Guruji bless us all. Peace and Prosperity to All !!VGR

--- On Mon, 7/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...@gro ups.comMonday, 7 December, 2009, 12:50 AM

 

 

 

 

Dear Pavan ji,

 

It seem you are also mixing up two things. The Mars dosha section talks about two points -

1. Mars dosha for marriage matching

2. Mars dosha for predicting "difference of opinion, disagreement, dispute"

 

The section that has been appended later on in 1971 edition (starting from - To cause different of opinion ....) is for using Mars dosha for predicting difference of opinion, disagreement, disputes etc. Shri KSK himself clearly mentioned that any planet can do that. The study also proved the same point which Shri KSK has said. If you read my earlier email, I appreciated study for proving this point.

 

Though my point is that study didn't touch Mars dosha in marriage matching. Shri KSK said -

"It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise on the correct match."

 

It is clearly Shri KSK's opinion for using Mars dosha in "marriage matching" and not predicting on individual's horoscope. Point 1 (Mars dosha in marriage matching) was suggested by Shri KSK but not touched by study. My reason for writing the email was that people should not confuse that the study rejected both - mars dosha in prediction and mars dosha in marriage matching. The truth is that the study touched only mars dosha in prediction on individual's chart.

 

Generally Shri KSK was very truthful and blunt in calling a spade a spade. If he found that something is not working, he bluntly said that. Though when he says something to "weigh and consider various points of Mars Dosha", we should listen him till the time some study proves otherwise. We will have to wait for a study that checks bride and groom's chart simultaneously and conclude something. I hope now you got my point.

 

I do not have 1966 edition with me. Tw ji said that upto "It is, therefore, ..." is reprint of earlier edition of 1966. Which means "It is, therefore, ..." was the actual conclusion by Shri KSK and I do not think that there should be any doubt on it. He starts with that I'll tell you my opinion and finally he offers this opinion to "weigh and consider various points of Mars Dosha".

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

 

 

On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 11:27 PM, vgr pavan <vgr_pavan1 (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Punitji pranam,Pardon for interfering ....the qoute in reader 4 is

"To cause difference of opinion, disagreement, dispute, divorce etc. among the couple it is not leftto Mars alone, any planet can cause such undesirable effect providedthey happen to be deposited in such a position, that the sublord ofthe planet is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 or the sublord isdeposited in a constellation, the lord of which is the significatorof 6 or 10 or 12".Guruji , also stressed that "any planet can cause

"such" undesirable effect , So he is telling that we need not give preference to "Mars" alone , any planet can cause such results. Again in the next para" If the sub lord is mars or if it is in the constellation of mars , and if is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 , there will be separation. If it is saturn , silence and remain dumb-stick and strike. thus we have to predict." here also he said "separation" will be caused by mars only when he is sublord or sub tenanted star lord and significator for 6,10,12. but not with mere placement of mars in various signs from asc, moon, venus. [in P.no. 194 under the head "Divorce""there is no mars dosha in this chart because it is in a movable sign , it is debilitated ; conjoined with mercury . Yet look at the fate . thus taking the position of

mars and offering predictions which appear more like a curse is not correct . but take the planets situated in the star or sub of mars in 1,2,4,8,12 ,. then , that planet tenanted in such a mars star will offer undesirable and disagreeable results.] point no. 3 "Shri KSK clearly mentioned it for compatibility matching"i think you are pointing the para above the para given by me, it reads as follows: "It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the correct match": in the starting of this explanation on mars dosha P.no.55 KSK mentioned that : "Let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion. " So i think that upto the above para (p.no. 69 ) is what Gurujis explanation about various rules and the later paragraphs are his "final" opinion.(which are last paras of the topic) .point no.4 guruji explained what vedic astrological rules for "Mars Dosha " are . but not instructed us to follow the same. These are my opinions .......Peace and Prosperity to All !!VGR --- On Sun, 6/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

 

 

Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com>Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

@gro ups.com

 

 

Sunday, 6 December, 2009, 9:40 PM

 

 

Dear Tw ji,

 

1. Please tell clearly whether you are saying that 1966 is more authentic or 1971. I do not understand the reason for initial 6 points.

2. Even in 1971 edition, when we say that ".... it can not be left to Mars alone", it clearly means that Mars has impact, but it is not the "only" reason. Shri KSK were very clear about the impact of Mars dosha and that is the rason instead of rejecting it (which he has done quite often in readers for some other theories like Ashtakvarga) , he said that this is not the reason "alone."

3. Regarding point 7, the question is not whether everything is pre-destined or not. The question is whether it is correct to check Mars dosha on indiviaul's chart where Shri KSK clearly mentioned it for compatibility matching. Any conclusion drawn without considered both the partner's horoscope seems incomplete to me and against what Shri KSK has mentioned about it.

4. You also didn't answer my question, whether Moon and Venus were considered or not, apart from Ascendant, in the study? We must remember that Shri KSK clearly mentioned about inclusion of Moon and Venus with Ascendant while judging Mars dosha.

5. What ideas you are finding speculative? I am just quoting what Shri KSK has said and what proof you need more than what Shri KSK has said himself.

 

My objections and questions doesn't mean that I am try to belittle the study. The study is useful and establish that Mars dosha has limited or no value when it comes to predicting disagreement, dispute, and divorce etc. in marriage. It is a good and useful finding. Though the study doesn't tell anything about Mars dosha compatibility and we should be very clear about it. Most of the problems are said when Mars dosha doesn't match in bride and groom's chart and this is the utility of this theory in Hindu astrology (and Indian families). Also, in future study must be extended to include Moon and Venus, so that it can test the real definition of Mars dosha and not just an incomplete definition of Mars dosha. Till the time the scope of study is clear, people may confuse and think that Mars dosha is match making doesn't exist which is actually not convered in the study.

 

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

 

On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 8:55 PM, TW <tw853 > wrote:

 

 

 

 

Dear Friends,

 

1. Mars dosha has been written in the KP Reader IV (Marriage, Married Life & Children) pages 51-69 (any Edition of reprinting). 2. Page 52, second and third parasOne may ask, "Why should they attach so much importance to the position of Mars alone? .......The reply is that there are some people who unnessarily exaggerate the evil results of Mars.....3. Page 55, third paraLet me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my opinion.4. Page 69 fourth para It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise on the correct match. 5. Up to the above para is reprinted from the early writtings in the Krishnamurti Padhdhati Vol II, Sagar publications, 1966.6. Page 69 fourth to sixth paras are added in the mentioned KP Reader IV, first published in May 1971; fourth para is as given under:To cause difference of opinion,disagreemen t, dispute, divorce etc. among the couple it is not left to Mars alone, any planet can cause such undesirable effect provided they happen to be deposited in such a position, that the sublord of the planet is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 or the sublord is deposited in a constellation, the lord of which is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12.

7. In KP, marriage matching, like education, occupation,death, is supposed to be predestined. 8. The speculative ideas would be sound, if and only if supported by a research study of sufficient numbers of charts other than here say experience or opinion.

 

Thanks and regards,

TW

 

@gro ups.com, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:>

 

 

 

 

 

> Dear Tw ji,> > I personally feel that the study missed few very basic but important points> and I would like to mention the same -> > 1. Problems due to Mars Dosha, tradionally as well as narrated by Shri KSK (> http://logy. astrosage. com/mars- dosha), occurs only when the husband> and wife do not have same level of dosha. The problem exists only if a> person having Mars dosha marries to the person who doesn't have Mars dosha> (even if we ignore level of dosha). The study seems to consider> only individual's chart and not two charts together. If it is studying> only individual's chart, the study doesn't have much meaning. A study needs> to see Mars dosha in two situation and compare - a) mars dosha person> marriying to mars dosha person, b) mars dosha person not

marring to Mars> dosha person. Till the time we compare this two situation, how come we> conclude whether Mars Dosha works or not.> > 2. Traditonally as well as according to Shri KSK, Mars dosha should be> checked from Ascendant, Moon and Venus. It seems that study is considering> only Ascedant and ignoring Moon and Venus. Again, if we do not follow the> definition properly, the conclusion reached can not be called correct.> > Here is the conclusion from your article -> "It is to follow the KP rules only in considering longevity, matching,> separation, divorce, multi-marriage, happy or unhappy married life etc.> without mixing up with the traditional Manglik-to- Manglik matching rule and> explain the public not to worry about Mars Dosha as suggested by Shri K.> Hariharan."> > Here again it seems that we are mixing up two things. KP does NOT

provide> any tool for chart matching and Mars dosha is a tool for matching and not> for prediction. KP clearly gives the rule for longevity etc., but doesn't> tell much about matching two charts. There is no doubt that KP is dependent> on traditional methods of horoscope matching as far as KP readers are> concerned. This is the reason Koota as well as Mars dosha found place in KP.> In my opinion, the study is about Mars dosha as a predictive tool (which is> not discussed by Shri KSK) and NOT Mars dosha as a matching tool (which is> discussed by Shri KSK).> > Thanks & Regards,> > Punit Pandey> >

> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:51 PM, TW tw853 wrote:> > >> >> > Dear Friends,> > What has been found is in the File section under:> > MARS DOSHA IN KP.doc> > Regards,> > TW> >> >> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>, Punit

> > Pandey punitp@ wrote:> > >> > > Dear Friends,> > >> > > Here is what is found in third reader -> > >> > > http://logy. astrosage. com/mars- dosha> > >> > > Thanks & Regards,> > >> > > Punit Pandey> > >> > >> > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Ramani kadavasalramani@ wrote:> > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Shri Bansalj,> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Any kind of Mars Dosha including the Mars in 4th fron Lagna or Moon or> > > > Venus gets cancelled when Mars is aspected by Saturn.> > > >> > > >> > >

>> > > > Truly yours,> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > K.S.V.Ramani> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > ** @gro ups.com <%40. com>[> > @gro ups.com <%40. com>] *On

> > > > Behalf Of *pankaj bansal> > > > *Sent:* 04 December 2009 22:50> > > >> > > > *To:* @gro ups.com <%40. com>

> > > > *Subject:* Re: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the> > years...> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Namaste Lajmiji,> > > >> > > > If Mars is placed In 4th house from> > > > Lagna & Venus and Placed in POORVASHADA Nakshatra(Venus) .Then there is No> > So> > > > called Mars dosha and the Native Can Marriage anybody who had or had> > not> > > > mars dosha in this Birth Chart?Eagerly waiting for your precious> > response.> > > >> > > > Thanks> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > ** Yogesh Lajmi yogeshlajmi@> > > >>

> > > *To:* @gro ups.com <%40. com>

 

 

 

 

> > > > *Cc:* Punit Pandey punitp@> > > > *Sent:* Fri, 4 December, 2009 8:05:18 PM> >> > > > *Subject:* MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Dear Members,> > > >> > > > Not withstanding what has been averred by some "K.P.> > > > research scholars",> > > >> > > > and whose research has been qestioned already in these columns by many> > KP> > > > followers,> > > >> > > > *and also,*my own experience about Mars Dosha,over the years,and after> > > > analysing the charts of many a married couples,for marital> > > > problems,especially ,after marriage,I agree 100% with the observation> > in> > >

> K.P. books that *Mars posited in Sun's star,or own star,and occuping> > > > houses I,II,IV,VII, VIII & XII** **alone causes Mars Dosha**...*> > > >> > > > I invite the opinion of all members...on this very> > > > controversial matter,and I must add here that almost ALL of my clients> > who> > > > come to consult me,strongly believe about the existence of Mars> > Dosha...so> > > > much so that they attribute almost every domestic problem to the> > existence> > > > of Mars Dosha,and keep asking for *"remedies". . .* !> > > >> > > > Which I patiently have to explain in detail...based> > > > on their own experience in the practise of the K.P. System...> > > >> > > > This is just to illustrate how deeply the ill-effects>

> > > of Mars are embedded in the minds of people,at large...> > > >> > > > Am looking forward to comments from discerning> > > > members...> > > >> > > > With kind regards,> > > >> > > > Yogesh Lajmi.> > > >> > > > * *> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > Win 1 of 4 Sony home entertainment packs thanks to 7. Enter now<> > http://us.lrd. / _ylc=X3oDMTJxN2x 2ZmNpBF9zAzIwMjM 2MTY2MTMEdG1fZG1 lY2gDVGV4dCBMaW5 rBHRtX2xuawNVMTE wMzk3NwR0bV9uZXQ DWWFob28hBHRtX3B vcwN0YWdsaW5lBHR tX3BwdHkDYXVueg- -/SIG=14600t3ni/ **http%3A/ au.rd.. com/mail/ tagline/sony/ *http%3A/ au.docs.. com/homepageset/ %3Fp1=other% 26p2=au%26p3= mailtagline > > >> > > > .> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > ------------ --------- ---------> > > >> > > > The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage<> > http://in.rd. / tagline_yyi_ 1/*http:/ in.. com/>> > > > .> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > > >>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

 

 

 

 

 

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage.

 

 

 

See what's on at the movies in your area. Find out now.

 

See what's on at the movies in your area. Find out now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Dear Friends,

 

1. The evolving research fidings were written in the original KP two volumes of

1966 and KP Readers of 1970-71, and so there are inconsistencies causing

confusion on some issues.

2. The Bhatt's Nakshatra Chintamani and Further Lights on Nakshatra Chintamani

are the best narrative KP books according to the KP Readers, and nothing is

practically new other than the Readers.

3. The KP style of writting for an issue is first explaining the Traditional and

Western views, and then saying what is as per KP.

4. Regarding Mars dosha,the whole explanation and the following conclusion is as

per Traditional because the conclusion was not or could not be said to be as per

KP.

" It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and

consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the

correct match "

5. For KP way three paras are added to understand that there is no Mars dosha in

KP. That is why there is no practical article or no KP astrologer writing with

evidence on working of Mars dosha in the whole KP literature, and any single

word of Mars Dosha is not mentioned in the Bhatt's books.

6. The speculative rules of Mars dosha without support of sufficient

evidence are tested statistically and found not working. Mars dosha even in

Traditional way is found not to be the reason for multi-marriage or divorce by

late Shri Raichur in review of 100 AA multi-marriage charts. All are included in

the article MARS DOSHA IN KP.doc

in the File section.

 

Thanks and regards,

TW

, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:

>

> Dear Pavan ji,

>

> *//are you saying that Guruji doesnt have any match making at his time for

> him thats why neither supported nor rejected Mars dosha,//*

> You got it right. He didn't had any method for horoscope matching and Mars

> dosha doesn't fit well in KP. The dilemma is quite clear from the article. I

> have repeated this understanding of mine many times now. His dilemma is

> clear and that is the reason he has to append few more paragraphs to the

> article, which actually made article more confusing.

>

> *//An author like Sri KSK who released an entire book on marriage & progeny

> ( giving highest preference than any set of events ie. money, profession

> etc..) and rejected all types of " poruthams " can not comment on mars dosha

> clearly and left it to his students (not mentioning about that) for further

> research !//*

> This is a fact. Probably he found marriage most challenging and difficult to

> interpret and hence had to devote maximum text to it. No wonder, we have

> seen many failures in predicting marriage time using KP principles in this

> forum itself.

>

> He also was not able to conclude about predicting height of the partner and

> he mentioned the same in fourth reader. In third reader he said that the

> research is going on progression. There are many areas where he was not able

> to conclude. Astrology is ocean and we can not expect him to give us

> everything. By including all seemingly contradictory content in the readers,

> he wanted his followers to be open, accepting, and ready for research. There

> are reasons why he didn't write to-the-point book like Nakshatra Chintamani

> but opted altogether different approach in his readers.

>

> *//what is your opinion on these questions, Does it mean that KSK didnt know

> answers for these queries and suggested Mars-dosha for match making.//*

> He tried to answer these questions and some other questions he raised

> earlier in the form of conclusion. If we read the article we can find that

> he answered question based on his understanding.

>

> On a side note, if he didn't know the answer, then he didn't know the

> answer. What is the harm in accepting that? Let us not treat Shri KSK as the

> end of astrology but a new beginning of astrology. He knew few principles

> very well and he clearly taught us. Some of the principles where he was also

> unsure, left for future research. Research will continue and should not end

> with Shri KSK, and it was his wish.

>

> *//Practically in how many divorced charts we find mars dosham ..........

> let us collect those charts and study and look for ourselves.//*

> I agree that this is the best way to conclude a topic. We are doing it in

> this forum for a long time and should keep doing. There is no alternate to

> practical study.

>

> Thanks & Regards,

>

> Punit Pandey

>

>

> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 5:39 PM, vgr pavan <vgr_pavan1 wrote:

>

> >

> >

> > Punitji Pranam,

> >

> >

> > Shri KSK neither rejected nor advocated Mars dosha because he didn't have

> > any alternate for marriage matching at that time. He simply shared his

> > opinion and left it up to future development. Mars dosha is not alone there

> > are many cases that he left untouched for future.

> >

> > are you saying that Guruji doesnt have any match making at his time for

> > him thats why neither supported nor rejected Mars dosha,

> >

> > An author like Sri KSK who released an entire book on marriage & progeny (

> > giving highest preference than any set of events ie. money, profession

> > etc..) and rejected all types of " poruthams " can not comment on mars dosha

> > clearly and left it to his students (not mentioning about that) for further

> > research !

> >

> > he clearly stated that one should not unnecessarily worry about kuja dosha

> > what else will be the proof than this,.

> >

> > he clearly and straightly asked the points :

> >

> > 18. If there is no such dosha in both the horoscopes , is a happy and

> > harmonious wedded life guaranteed for a long no.of years ?

> >

> > 19. as the houses 2,7,11 indicate ones marriage as well as the state of

> > married life , if these houses are occupied by benefics and if mars

> > occupies an evil sign , even then will there be any bad effect ?

> >

> > 20. If the houses 2,7 and 11 are owned by malefics and occupied by malefics

> > and there is no mars dosha , how can the partners lead a prosperous life ?

> >

> >

> > what is your opinion on these questions, Does it mean that KSK didnt know

> > answers for these queries and suggested Mars-dosha for match making.

> >

> > KSK never told that compatibility analysis for prosperous married life. he

> > just asked us to see whether the native is blessed with prosperous married

> > life or not, if he has not such luck .......which chart we shall select for

> > him.

> >

> > KSK always said that see the " praptham " (possibility) not the

> > " porutham " (compatibilty)

> >

> > which his students like M.C.khare, sivapadam etc mentioned in their

> > articles.........

> >

> > Practically in how many divorced charts we find mars dosham ..........

> >

> > let us collect those charts and study and look for ourselves.

> >

> > I am not Pointing any one , i want to learn more from this debate.....

> >

> > (frankly speaking your discussion lead to me read this topic again and

> > again, thanks for that )

> >

> >

> > Peace and Prosperity to All !!

> >

> > VGR

> >

> > --- On *Tue, 8/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp* wrote:

> >

> >

> > Punit Pandey <punitp

> > Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

> >

> > Tuesday, 8 December, 2009, 6:42 PM

> >

> >

> >

> > Dear Pavan ji,

> >

> > According to him the Mars dosha, as it is judged traditionally, is not

> > correct. He recommends us to consider those 20 points while judging Mars

> > dosha. This is another differentiator of the article.

> >

> > He is trying to answer the question which he asked himself. He also says

> > that there are people who unnecessary exaggerate Mars dosha without

> > considering 20 given points. In other words, Mars dosha should be judged

> > keeping those 20 points in mind.

> >

> > Does it not mean that he is recommending Mars dosha under some of his

> > recommendations that he kept telling in the article?

> >

> > It is not rejection, but a correction to traditional understating IMO.

> >

> > Thanks & Regards,

> >

> > Punit Pandey

> >

> >

> > On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 6:16 PM, vgr pavan <vgr_pavan1 (AT) (DOT)

co.in<http://mc/compose?to=vgr_pavan1

> > > wrote:

> >

> >>

> >>

> >> punitji pranam,

> >>

> >> waiting for your reply on point 4 .

> >>

> >> regards

> >>

> >>

> >> Peace and Prosperity to All !!

> >>

> >> VGR

> >>

> >> --- On *Tue, 8/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT)

com<http://mc/compose?to=punitp

> >> >* wrote:

> >>

> >>

> >> Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com<http://mc/compose?to=punitp

> >> >

> >> Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...

> >> @gro

ups.com<http://mc/compose?to= >

> >> Tuesday, 8 December, 2009, 5:29 PM

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >> Dear Pavan ji,

> >>

> >> // I still didnt understand what is the difference between mars dosha for

> >> compatibility and mars causing seperation. //

> >> As you know marriage matching is used to decide upon the horoscope of

> >> bride or groom. How Mars dosha is used tradionally? Is it used on single

> >> horoscope?

> >>

> >> Marriage matching is done on two charts. It is not about making some

> >> prediction for individual but composite study of impact of two horoscopes

on

> >> each other. KP doesn't have any method for marriage matching in readers and

> >> hence we can see development of KPDP later.

> >>

> >> //1.) Our Guruji gave preference to stars but not to the mere placement

> >> in a sign ,(like in vedic astrology). Even in star placements he went

> >> further and divided into sub divisions. He proved that the minute

> >> subdivisions are responsible in drastic changes in the lifes of the people

> >> born in the same place or twins.

> >> In this context how it will be logical to belive that KSK suggested us to

> >> verify mars dosha (which deals only with placement in a sign). //

> >> Shri KSK also talked about mere placement of Saturn can cause Punarphoo

(http://logy.

> >> astrosage. com/punarphoo <http://logy.astrosage.com/punarphoo>).

> >> KP readers are full of such examples.

> >>

> >> I agree it doesn't gel well with KP and I have written a seperate email

> >> about it. But it was Shri KSK's choice to include this article. Probably he

> >> found something important and that is the reason we find it in readers. His

> >> choice. Contradictions are nothing new in KP readers.

> >>

> >> //3) why guruji suggested us to judge separately about longevity etc... If

> >> mars dosha can cause widowhood to either.//

> >> You missed the point that the appended paragraphs were not conclusion.

> >> Please see my discussion with Tw ji and you will find that the conclusion

is

> >> the paragraph where Shri KSK sugges weighing Mars Dosha in both the chart.

> >>

> >> The appended line, as those apply on individual chart, doesn't say

> >> anything about Mars dosha in marriage matching. If you will read tradional

> >> astrology books, you will also find application of Mars dosha in

> >> individual's horoscope and it is rejected by Shri KSK. The same is also

> >> proven by the study.

> >>

> >> //then how can we say that ksk advocated Kuja dosha analysis for match

> >> making.//

> >> Shri KSK neither rejected nor advocated Mars dosha because he didn't have

> >> any alternate for marriage matching at that time. He simply shared his

> >> opinion and left it up to future development. Mars dosha is not alone there

> >> are many cases that he left untouched for future.

> >>

> >> Now Mars dosha exists in Astro Secrets (as also shared by Lajmi ji) and

> >> KPDP. Again it is individual's choice to accept or reject it.

> >>

> >> //therefore it is clear that KSK categorise Mars-dosha and stated his

> >> opinion only for those astrologers but not to his followers : //

> >> It is your interpretion. He starts with " let me first of all reproduce the

> >> various rules and finally offer my opinion " and at then end of the article

> >> he offers his opinion that " It is therefore , necessary that

astrologersshould carefully weigh and consider the various points of mars dosha

in the

> >> given charts and advice on the correct match. "

> >>

> >> Now if we say that he referred astrologers to some other astrologers and

> >> not to his followers will be stretching it too far. He simply didn't have

> >> any alternate method of marriage matching and hence he draw that

conclusion.

> >> Accept it or reject it is our choice, though it is the fact that KP readers

> >> do not offer any method for marriage matching. Lajmi ji vociferously

> >> advocate KPDP and I guess there are some other methods available as well if

> >> we see later KP literature. Need of KPDP tells absense of marriage matching

> >> method in KP.

> >>

> >> What you are saying doesn't seem correct because of Shri KSK's nature of

> >> bluntly rejected the methods that doesn't work. He didn't reject it in the

> >> whole article. He is clearly recommending it to astrologers from above

> >> conclusion. Now assuming that these are some other astrologers and not KP

> >> followers, still he is recommending it to those astrologers and not

> >> rejecting it. I do not remember any other place in readers where Shri KSK

> >> has recommended some method to some astrologers and not to his followers.

> >> After all the readers are written for his followers and not for some other

> >> astrologers.

> >>

> >> Thanks & Regards,

> >>

> >> Punit Pandey

> >>

> >>

> >> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:02 PM, vgr pavan <vgr_pavan1 (AT) (DOT)

co.in<http://mc/compose?to=vgr_pavan1

> >> > wrote:

> >>

> >>>

> >>>

> >>> Punitji Pranam,

> >>>

> >>> I still didnt understand what is the difference between mars dosha for

> >>> compatibility and mars causing seperation.

> >>>

> >>> 1.) Our Guruji gave preference to stars but not to the mere placement in

> >>> a sign ,(like in vedic astrology). Even in star placements he went further

> >>> and divided into sub divisions. He proved that the minute subdivisions are

> >>> responsible in drastic changes in the lifes of the people born in the same

> >>> place or twins.

> >>> In this context how it will be logical to belive that KSK suggested us to

> >>> verify mars dosha (which deals only with placement in a sign).

> >>>

> >>> 2) KSK in many instances told that every one has to face the good or bad

> >>> events in his life based upon the meritorious deeds done in his previous

> >>> birth and no chart has influence on others life. then how will be to

think

> >>> that mars placement in wifes chart will cause problems even though

husbands

> >>> chart indicating hormonious wedded life !

> >>>

> >>> 3) why guruji suggested us to judge separately about longevity etc... If

> >>> mars dosha can cause widowhood to either.

> >>>

> >>> 4) p.no. 52. Guruji stated as follows :

> >>>

> >>> One may ask, ' " why should they attach too much importance to the position

> >>> of mars alone ? we had never heard anybody taking of moon`s dosha or any

> >>> other planet`s dosha or sun`s dosha or any other planets dosha . then

does

> >>> it mean that mars alone will do so much harm to the couple to the couple

> >>> which other planets cannot do " ?

> >>>

> >>> the reply is that there are some people who unnecessarily exaggerate the

> >>> evil results of mars. Most of the following points are not taken into

> >>> consideration he stated 20 points against kuja dosha:

> >>>

> >>>

> >>> then how can we say that ksk advocated Kuja dosha analysis for match

> >>> making.

> >>>

> >>> the reason for the para by Guruji as shown by you is that (as i feel)

> >>>

> >>>

> >>> in the starting of the concept p.no. 55 :

> >>>

> >>>

> >>> " when parents attempt to fix the marriage of their sons and the

> >>> daughters, the so called mars dosha , interpreted by astrologersaccording

to their whims and fancies , confuses them due to varying opinion

> >>> given by them. "

> >>>

> >>>

> >>> after few lines :

> >>>

> >>> " let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my

> >>> opinion " :

> >>>

> >>> thats why he divided mars-dosha into three groups and said the anology of

> >>> blood group (because ksk tries to say that we has to match the chart

having

> >>> kuja dosha with a chart having similar dosha but not the other two

> >>> variants,)

> >>>

> >>> therefore it is clear that KSK categorise Mars-dosha and stated his

> >>> opinion only for those astrologers but not to his followers :

> >>>

> >>>

> >>> " It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and

> >>> consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice

on

> >>> the correct match "

> >>>

> >>> As per the mails of tinwinji i understood that the topic ended here, and

> >>> later the last few paras were inserted So as to let the readers know how

> >>> K.P. followers look at these " doshas " by taking only the sub-level

> >>> significations and not the mere placement of mars in different signs.

> >>>

> >>> hope i am clear.

> >>>

> >>> i am not critising any one this iis what i understood about this concept.

> >>>

> >>> Guruji bless us all.

> >>>

> >>>

> >>> Peace and Prosperity to All !!

> >>>

> >>> VGR

> >>>

> >>> --- On *Mon, 7/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT)

com<http://mc/compose?to=punitp

> >>> >* wrote:

> >>>

> >>>

> >>> Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com<http://mc/compose?to=punitp

> >>> >

> >>> Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the

> >>> years...

> >>> @gro

ups.com<http://mc/compose?to= >

> >>> Monday, 7 December, 2009, 12:50 AM

> >>>

> >>>

> >>>

> >>> Dear Pavan ji,

> >>>

> >>> It seem you are also mixing up two things. The Mars dosha section talks

> >>> about two points -

> >>> 1. Mars dosha for marriage matching

> >>> 2. Mars dosha for predicting " difference of opinion, disagreement,

> >>> dispute "

> >>>

> >>> The section that has been appended later on in 1971 edition (starting

> >>> from - To cause different of opinion ....) is for using Mars dosha for

> >>> predicting difference of opinion, disagreement, disputes etc. Shri KSK

> >>> himself clearly mentioned that any planet can do that. The study also

proved

> >>> the same point which Shri KSK has said. If you read my earlier email, I

> >>> appreciated study for proving this point.

> >>>

> >>> Though my point is that study didn't touch Mars dosha in marriage

> >>> matching. Shri KSK said -

> >>> " It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh and

> >>> consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise

on

> >>> the correct match. "

> >>>

> >>> It is clearly Shri KSK's opinion for using Mars dosha in " marriage

> >>> matching " and not predicting on individual's horoscope. Point 1 (Mars

dosha

> >>> in marriage matching) was suggested by Shri KSK but not touched by study.

My

> >>> reason for writing the email was that people should not confuse that the

> >>> study rejected both - mars dosha in prediction and mars dosha in marriage

> >>> matching. The truth is that the study touched only mars dosha in

prediction

> >>> on individual's chart.

> >>>

> >>> Generally Shri KSK was very truthful and blunt in calling a spade a

> >>> spade. If he found that something is not working, he bluntly said that.

> >>> Though when he says something to " weigh and consider various points of

Mars

> >>> Dosha " , we should listen him till the time some study proves otherwise. We

> >>> will have to wait for a study that checks bride and groom's chart

> >>> simultaneously and conclude something. I hope now you got my point.

> >>>

> >>> I do not have 1966 edition with me. Tw ji said that upto " It is,

> >>> therefore, ... " is reprint of earlier edition of 1966. Which means " It is,

> >>> therefore, ... " was the actual conclusion by Shri KSK and I do not think

> >>> that there should be any doubt on it. He starts with that I'll tell you my

> >>> opinion and finally he offers this opinion to " weigh and consider various

> >>> points of Mars Dosha " .

> >>>

> >>> Thanks & Regards,

> >>>

> >>> Punit Pandey

> >>>

> >>>

> >>> On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 11:27 PM, vgr pavan <vgr_pavan1 (AT) (DOT)

co.in<http://mc/compose?to=vgr_pavan1

> >>> > wrote:

> >>>

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>> Punitji pranam,

> >>>>

> >>>> Pardon for interfering ....

> >>>>

> >>>> the qoute in reader 4 is

> >>>>

> >>>> " To cause difference of opinion,

> >>>> disagreement, dispute, divorce etc. among the couple it is not left

> >>>> to Mars alone, any planet can cause such undesirable effect provided

> >>>> they happen to be deposited in such a position, that the sublord of

> >>>> the planet is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 or the sublord is

> >>>> deposited in a constellation, the lord of which is the significator

> >>>> of 6 or 10 or 12 " .

> >>>>

> >>>> Guruji , also stressed that " any planet can cause " such " undesirable

> >>>> effect , So he is telling

> >>>> that we need not give preference to " Mars " alone , any planet can cause

> >>>> such results.

> >>>>

> >>>> Again in the next para

> >>>>

> >>>> " If the sub lord is mars or if it is in the constellation of mars ,

> >>>> and if is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 , there will be separation.

If

> >>>> it is saturn , silence and remain dumb-stick and strike. thus we have to

> >>>> predict. "

> >>>>

> >>>> here also he said " separation " will be caused by mars only when he is

> >>>> sublord or sub tenanted star lord and significator for 6,10,12. but not

> >>>> with mere placement of mars in various signs from asc, moon, venus.

> >>>>

> >>>> [in P.no. 194 under the head " Divorce "

> >>>>

> >>>> " there is no mars dosha in this chart because it is in a movable sign ,

> >>>> it is debilitated ; conjoined with mercury . Yet look at the fate . thus

> >>>> taking the position of mars and offering predictions which appear more

like

> >>>> a curse is not correct . but take the planets situated in the star or

sub

> >>>> of mars in 1,2,4,8,12 ,. then , that planet tenanted in such a mars star

> >>>> will offer undesirable and disagreeable results.]

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>> point no. 3 " Shri KSK clearly mentioned it for compatibility matching

> >>>> "

> >>>>

> >>>> i think you are pointing the para above the para given by me, it reads

> >>>> as follows:

> >>>>

> >>>> " It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and

> >>>> consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice

on

> >>>> the correct match " :

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>> in the starting of this explanation on mars dosha P.no.55 KSK mentioned

> >>>> that :

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>> " Let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my

> >>>> opinion. "

> >>>>

> >>>> So i think that upto the above para (p.no. 69 ) is what Gurujis

> >>>> explanation about various rules and the later paragraphs are his " final "

> >>>> opinion.(which are last paras of the topic) .

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>> point no.4

> >>>>

> >>>> guruji explained what vedic astrological rules for " Mars Dosha " are .

> >>>> but not instructed us to follow the same.

> >>>>

> >>>> These are my opinions .......

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>> Peace and Prosperity to All !!

> >>>>

> >>>> VGR

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>> --- On *Sun, 6/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT)

com<http://mc/compose?to=punitp

> >>>> >* wrote:

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>> Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com<http://mc/compose?to=punitp

> >>>> >

> >>>> Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the

> >>>> years...

> >>>>

> >>>> @gro

ups.com<http://mc/compose?to= >

> >>>> Sunday, 6 December, 2009, 9:40 PM

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>> Dear Tw ji,

> >>>>

> >>>> 1. Please tell clearly whether you are saying that 1966 is more

> >>>> authentic or 1971. I do not understand the reason for initial 6 points.

> >>>> 2. Even in 1971 edition, when we say that " .... it can not be left to

> >>>> Mars alone " , it clearly means that Mars has impact, but it is not the

" only "

> >>>> reason. Shri KSK were very clear about the impact of Mars dosha and that

is

> >>>> the rason instead of rejecting it (which he has done quite often in

readers

> >>>> for some other theories like Ashtakvarga) , he said that this is not the

> >>>> reason " alone. "

> >>>> 3. Regarding point 7, the question is not whether everything is

> >>>> pre-destined or not. The question is whether it is correct to check Mars

> >>>> dosha on indiviaul's chart where Shri KSK clearly mentioned it for

> >>>> compatibility matching. Any conclusion drawn without considered both the

> >>>> partner's horoscope seems incomplete to me and against what Shri KSK has

> >>>> mentioned about it.

> >>>> 4. You also didn't answer my question, whether Moon and Venus were

> >>>> considered or not, apart from Ascendant, in the study? We must remember

that

> >>>> Shri KSK clearly mentioned about inclusion of Moon and Venus with

Ascendant

> >>>> while judging Mars dosha.

> >>>> 5. What ideas you are finding speculative? I am just quoting what Shri

> >>>> KSK has said and what proof you need more than what Shri KSK has said

> >>>> himself.

> >>>>

> >>>> My objections and questions doesn't mean that I am try to belittle the

> >>>> study. The study is useful and establish that Mars dosha has limited or

no

> >>>> value when it comes to predicting disagreement, dispute, and divorce etc.

in

> >>>> marriage. It is a good and useful finding. Though the study doesn't tell

> >>>> anything about Mars dosha compatibility and we should be very clear about

> >>>> it. Most of the problems are said when Mars dosha doesn't match in bride

and

> >>>> groom's chart and this is the utility of this theory in Hindu astrology

(and

> >>>> Indian families). Also, in future study must be extended to include Moon

and

> >>>> Venus, so that it can test the real definition of Mars dosha and not just

an

> >>>> incomplete definition of Mars dosha. Till the time the scope of study is

> >>>> clear, people may confuse and think that Mars dosha is match making

doesn't

> >>>> exist which is actually not convered in the study.

> >>>>

> >>>> Thanks & Regards,

> >>>>

> >>>> Punit Pandey

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>> On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 8:55 PM, TW <tw853 (AT) (DOT)

com<http://mc/compose?to=tw853

> >>>> > wrote:

> >>>>

> >>>>>

> >>>>>

> >>>>> Dear Friends,

> >>>>>

> >>>>> 1. Mars dosha has been written in the KP Reader IV (Marriage, Married

> >>>>> Life & Children) pages 51-69 (any Edition of reprinting).

> >>>>> 2. Page 52, second and third paras

> >>>>> One may ask, " Why should they attach so much importance to the position

> >>>>> of Mars alone? .......

> >>>>> The reply is that there are some people who unnessarily exaggerate the

> >>>>> evil results of Mars.....

> >>>>> 3. Page 55, third para

> >>>>> Let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my

> >>>>> opinion.

> >>>>> 4. Page 69 fourth para

> >>>>> It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh and

> >>>>> consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise

on

> >>>>> the correct match.

> >>>>> 5. Up to the above para is reprinted from the early writtings in the

> >>>>> Krishnamurti Padhdhati Vol II, Sagar publications, 1966.

> >>>>> 6. Page 69 fourth to sixth paras are added in the mentioned KP Reader

> >>>>> IV, first published in May 1971; fourth para is as given under:

> >>>>> To cause difference of opinion,disagreemen t, dispute, divorce etc.

> >>>>> among the couple it is not left to Mars alone, any planet can cause such

> >>>>> undesirable effect provided they happen to be deposited in such a

position,

> >>>>> that the sublord of the planet is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 or

the

> >>>>> sublord is deposited in a constellation, the lord of which is the

> >>>>> significator of 6 or 10 or 12.

> >>>>> 7. In KP, marriage matching, like education, occupation,death, is

> >>>>> supposed to be predestined.

> >>>>> 8. The speculative ideas would be sound, if and only if supported by a

> >>>>> research study of sufficient numbers of charts other than here say

> >>>>> experience or opinion.

> >>>>>

> >>>>> Thanks and regards,

> >>>>>

> >>>>> TW

> >>>>>

> >>>>>

> >>>>> @gro

ups.com<http://mc/compose?to= >,

> >>>>> Punit Pandey <punitp@> wrote:

> >>>>> >

> >>>>> > Dear Tw ji,

> >>>>> >

> >>>>> > I personally feel that the study missed few very basic but important

> >>>>> points

> >>>>> > and I would like to mention the same -

> >>>>> >

> >>>>> > 1. Problems due to Mars Dosha, tradionally as well as narrated by

> >>>>> Shri KSK (

> >>>>> > http://logy. astrosage. com/mars-

dosha<http://logy.astrosage.com/mars-dosha>),

> >>>>> occurs only when the husband

> >>>>> > and wife do not have same level of dosha. The problem exists only if

> >>>>> a

> >>>>> > person having Mars dosha marries to the person who doesn't have Mars

> >>>>> dosha

> >>>>> > (even if we ignore level of dosha). The study seems to consider

> >>>>> > only individual's chart and not two charts together. If it is

> >>>>> studying

> >>>>> > only individual's chart, the study doesn't have much meaning. A study

> >>>>> needs

> >>>>> > to see Mars dosha in two situation and compare - a) mars dosha person

> >>>>> > marriying to mars dosha person, b) mars dosha person not marring to

> >>>>> Mars

> >>>>> > dosha person. Till the time we compare this two situation, how come

> >>>>> we

> >>>>> > conclude whether Mars Dosha works or not.

> >>>>> >

> >>>>> > 2. Traditonally as well as according to Shri KSK, Mars dosha should

> >>>>> be

> >>>>> > checked from Ascendant, Moon and Venus. It seems that study is

> >>>>> considering

> >>>>> > only Ascedant and ignoring Moon and Venus. Again, if we do not follow

> >>>>> the

> >>>>> > definition properly, the conclusion reached can not be called

> >>>>> correct.

> >>>>> >

> >>>>> > Here is the conclusion from your article -

> >>>>> > " It is to follow the KP rules only in considering longevity,

> >>>>> matching,

> >>>>> > separation, divorce, multi-marriage, happy or unhappy married life

> >>>>> etc.

> >>>>> > without mixing up with the traditional Manglik-to- Manglik matching

> >>>>> rule and

> >>>>> > explain the public not to worry about Mars Dosha as suggested by Shri

> >>>>> K.

> >>>>> > Hariharan. "

> >>>>> >

> >>>>> > Here again it seems that we are mixing up two things. KP does NOT

> >>>>> provide

> >>>>> > any tool for chart matching and Mars dosha is a tool for matching and

> >>>>> not

> >>>>> > for prediction. KP clearly gives the rule for longevity etc., but

> >>>>> doesn't

> >>>>> > tell much about matching two charts. There is no doubt that KP is

> >>>>> dependent

> >>>>> > on traditional methods of horoscope matching as far as KP readers are

> >>>>> > concerned. This is the reason Koota as well as Mars dosha found place

> >>>>> in KP.

> >>>>> > In my opinion, the study is about Mars dosha as a predictive tool

> >>>>> (which is

> >>>>> > not discussed by Shri KSK) and NOT Mars dosha as a matching tool

> >>>>> (which is

> >>>>> > discussed by Shri KSK).

> >>>>> >

> >>>>> > Thanks & Regards,

> >>>>> >

> >>>>> > Punit Pandey

> >>>>> >

> >>>>> >

> >>>>> > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:51 PM, TW tw853@ wrote:

> >>>>> >

> >>>>> > >

> >>>>> > >

> >>>>> > > Dear Friends,

> >>>>> > > What has been found is in the File section under:

> >>>>> > > MARS DOSHA IN KP.doc

> >>>>> > > Regards,

> >>>>> > > TW

> >>>>> > >

> >>>>> > >

> >>>>> > > @gro

ups.com<http://mc/compose?to= ><%40\

s.

> >>>>> com <http://40/>>, Punit

> >>>>>

> >>>>> > > Pandey punitp@ wrote:

> >>>>> > > >

> >>>>> > > > Dear Friends,

> >>>>> > > >

> >>>>> > > > Here is what is found in third reader -

> >>>>> > > >

> >>>>> > > > http://logy. astrosage. com/mars-

dosha<http://logy.astrosage.com/mars-dosha>

> >>>>> > > >

> >>>>> > > > Thanks & Regards,

> >>>>> > > >

> >>>>> > > > Punit Pandey

> >>>>> > > >

> >>>>> > > >

> >>>>> > > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Ramani kadavasalramani@ wrote:

> >>>>> > > >

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > > Dear Shri Bansalj,

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > > Any kind of Mars Dosha including the Mars in 4th fron Lagna or

> >>>>> Moon or

> >>>>> > > > > Venus gets cancelled when Mars is aspected by Saturn.

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > > Truly yours,

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > > K.S.V.Ramani

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > > ------------ --------- ---------

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > > ** @gro

ups.com<http://mc/compose?to= ><%40\

s.

> >>>>> com <http://40/>>[

> >>>>> > > @gro

ups.com<http://mc/compose?to= ><%40\

s.

> >>>>> com <http://40/>>] *On

> >>>>>

> >>>>> > > > > Behalf Of *pankaj bansal

> >>>>> > > > > *Sent:* 04 December 2009 22:50

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > > *To:* @gro

ups.com<http://mc/compose?to= ><%40\

s.

> >>>>> com <http://40/>>

> >>>>>

> >>>>> > > > > *Subject:* Re: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the

> >>>>> > > years...

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > > Namaste Lajmiji,

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > > If Mars is placed In 4th house from

> >>>>> > > > > Lagna & Venus and Placed in POORVASHADA Nakshatra(Venus) .Then

> >>>>> there is No

> >>>>> > > So

> >>>>> > > > > called Mars dosha and the Native Can Marriage anybody who had

> >>>>> or had

> >>>>> > > not

> >>>>> > > > > mars dosha in this Birth Chart?Eagerly waiting for your

> >>>>> precious

> >>>>> > > response.

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > > Thanks

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > > ------------ --------- ---------

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > > ** Yogesh Lajmi yogeshlajmi@

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > > *To:* @gro

ups.com<http://mc/compose?to= ><%40\

s.

> >>>>> com <http://40/>>

> >>>>>

> >>>>> > > > > *Cc:* Punit Pandey punitp@

> >>>>> > > > > *Sent:* Fri, 4 December, 2009 8:05:18 PM

> >>>>> > >

> >>>>> > > > > *Subject:* MARS DOSHA...my experience over the

> >>>>> years...

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > > Dear Members,

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > > Not withstanding what has been averred by some " K.P.

> >>>>> > > > > research scholars " ,

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > > and whose research has been qestioned already in these columns

> >>>>> by many

> >>>>> > > KP

> >>>>> > > > > followers,

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > > *and also,*my own experience about Mars Dosha,over the

> >>>>> years,and after

> >>>>> > > > > analysing the charts of many a married couples,for marital

> >>>>> > > > > problems,especially ,after marriage,I agree 100% with the

> >>>>> observation

> >>>>> > > in

> >>>>> > > > > K.P. books that *Mars posited in Sun's star,or own star,and

> >>>>> occuping

> >>>>> > > > > houses I,II,IV,VII, VIII & XII** **alone causes Mars

> >>>>> Dosha**...*

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > > I invite the opinion of all members...on this very

> >>>>> > > > > controversial matter,and I must add here that almost ALL of my

> >>>>> clients

> >>>>> > > who

> >>>>> > > > > come to consult me,strongly believe about the existence of Mars

> >>>>> > > Dosha...so

> >>>>> > > > > much so that they attribute almost every domestic problem to

> >>>>> the

> >>>>> > > existence

> >>>>> > > > > of Mars Dosha,and keep asking for * " remedies " .. .* !

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > > Which I patiently have to explain in detail...based

> >>>>> > > > > on their own experience in the practise of the K.P. System...

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > > This is just to illustrate how deeply the ill-effects

> >>>>> > > > > of Mars are embedded in the minds of people,at large...

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > > Am looking forward to comments from discerning

> >>>>> > > > > members...

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > > With kind regards,

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > > Yogesh Lajmi.

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > > * *

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > > ------------ --------- ---------

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > > Win 1 of 4 Sony home entertainment packs thanks to 7.

> >>>>> Enter now<

> >>>>> > > http://us.lrd. / _ylc=X3oDMTJxN2x 2ZmNpBF9zAzIwMjM

> >>>>> 2MTY2MTMEdG1fZG1 lY2gDVGV4dCBMaW5 rBHRtX2xuawNVMTE wMzk3NwR0bV9uZXQ

> >>>>> DWWFob28hBHRtX3B vcwN0YWdsaW5lBHR tX3BwdHkDYXVueg- -/SIG=14600t3ni/

> >>>>> **http%3A/ au.rd.. com/mail/ tagline/sony/ *http%3A/ au.docs..

> >>>>> com/homepageset/ %3Fp1=other% 26p2=au%26p3=

mailtagline<http://us.lrd./_ylc=X3oDMTJxN2x2ZmNpBF9zAzIwMjM2MTY2MTMEdG1\

fZG1lY2gDVGV4dCBMaW5rBHRtX2xuawNVMTEwMzk3NwR0bV9uZXQDWWFob28hBHRtX3BvcwN0YWdsaW5\

lBHRtX3BwdHkDYXVueg--/SIG=14600t3ni/**http%3A/au.rd./mail/tagline/sony/\

*http%3A/au.docs./homepageset/%3Fp1=other%26p2=au%26p3=mailtagline>

> >>>>>

> >>>>> > > >

> >>>>> > > > > .

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > > ------------ --------- ---------

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > > The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your

> >>>>> Homepage<

> >>>>> > > http://in.rd. / tagline_yyi_ 1/*http:/ in..

com/<http://in.rd./tagline_yyi_1/*http:/in./>

> >>>>> >

> >>>>> > > > > .

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > >

> >>>>> > >

> >>>>> > >

> >>>>> > >

> >>>>> >

> >>>>>

> >>>>>

> >>>>

> >>>> ------------------------------

> >>>> The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your

Homepage<http://in.rd./tagline_yyi_1/*http://in./>.

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>>

> >>>

> >>> ------------------------------

> >>> The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your

Homepage<http://in.rd./tagline_yyi_1/*http://in./>

> >>> .

> >>>

> >>>

> >>

> >> ------------------------------

> >> The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your

Homepage<http://in.rd./tagline_yyi_1/*http://in./>

> >> .

> >>

> >>

> >

> > ------------------------------

> > The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your

Homepage<http://in.rd./tagline_yyi_1/*http://in./>

> > .

> >

> >

> >

>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest guest

Dear Friends,

 

There are two conclusions - first earlier in 1966 edition and second one which is added later on in 1971 edition. The first conclusion suggests us to " weigh and consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise on the correct match. " It clearly suggests to check Mars dosha compatibility on two charts i.e. Mars dosha matching ('charts' is plural). The study DOES NOT touch Mars dosha matching at all, so the study is not relevant for this conclusion. Not only Shri KSK suggested to use Mars dosha in two charts (bride and groom) and check compatibility, traditionally also Mars dosha is used that way only. Primary reason why Mars dosha exists is for horoscope matching. We should not unnecessarily quote study for something which was out of the scope of the study. 

 

Second conclusion that " disagreement, dispute, divorce can not be left on Mars alone " is very clear. He rejected application of Mars dosha on individual chart and there is no need for any study till the time we have doubt on what Shri KSK has written. The study, though, proved again that Mars dosha on individual chart is not much useful for drawing any conclusion.

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 7:38 PM, TW <tw853 wrote:

 

 

 

 

Dear Friends,1. The evolving research fidings were written in the original KP two volumes of 1966 and KP Readers of 1970-71, and so there are inconsistencies causing confusion on some issues.2. The Bhatt's Nakshatra Chintamani and Further Lights on Nakshatra Chintamani are the best narrative KP books according to the KP Readers, and nothing is practically new other than the Readers.

3. The KP style of writting for an issue is first explaining the Traditional and Western views, and then saying what is as per KP.4. Regarding Mars dosha,the whole explanation and the following conclusion is as per Traditional because the conclusion was not or could not be said to be as per KP.

" It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on the correct match " 5. For KP way three paras are added to understand that there is no Mars dosha in KP. That is why there is no practical article or no KP astrologer writing with evidence on working of Mars dosha in the whole KP literature, and any single word of Mars Dosha is not mentioned in the Bhatt's books.

6. The speculative rules of Mars dosha without support of sufficient evidence are tested statistically and found not working. Mars dosha even in Traditional way is found not to be the reason for multi-marriage or divorce by late Shri Raichur in review of 100 AA multi-marriage charts. All are included in the article MARS DOSHA IN KP.doc

in the File section.Thanks and regards,TW

 

, Punit Pandey <punitp wrote:>> Dear Pavan ji,> > *//are you saying that Guruji doesnt have any match making at his time for

> him thats why neither supported nor rejected Mars dosha,//*> You got it right. He didn't had any method for horoscope matching and Mars> dosha doesn't fit well in KP. The dilemma is quite clear from the article. I

> have repeated this understanding of mine many times now. His dilemma is> clear and that is the reason he has to append few more paragraphs to the> article, which actually made article more confusing.

> > *//An author like Sri KSK who released an entire book on marriage & progeny> ( giving highest preference than any set of events ie. money, profession> etc..) and rejected all types of " poruthams " can not comment on mars dosha

> clearly and left it to his students (not mentioning about that) for further> research !//*> This is a fact. Probably he found marriage most challenging and difficult to> interpret and hence had to devote maximum text to it. No wonder, we have

> seen many failures in predicting marriage time using KP principles in this> forum itself.> > He also was not able to conclude about predicting height of the partner and> he mentioned the same in fourth reader. In third reader he said that the

> research is going on progression. There are many areas where he was not able> to conclude. Astrology is ocean and we can not expect him to give us> everything. By including all seemingly contradictory content in the readers,

> he wanted his followers to be open, accepting, and ready for research. There> are reasons why he didn't write to-the-point book like Nakshatra Chintamani> but opted altogether different approach in his readers.

> > *//what is your opinion on these questions, Does it mean that KSK didnt know> answers for these queries and suggested Mars-dosha for match making.//*> He tried to answer these questions and some other questions he raised

> earlier in the form of conclusion. If we read the article we can find that> he answered question based on his understanding.> > On a side note, if he didn't know the answer, then he didn't know the

> answer. What is the harm in accepting that? Let us not treat Shri KSK as the> end of astrology but a new beginning of astrology. He knew few principles> very well and he clearly taught us. Some of the principles where he was also

> unsure, left for future research. Research will continue and should not end> with Shri KSK, and it was his wish.> > *//Practically in how many divorced charts we find mars dosham ..........> let us collect those charts and study and look for ourselves.//*

> I agree that this is the best way to conclude a topic. We are doing it in> this forum for a long time and should keep doing. There is no alternate to> practical study.> > Thanks & Regards,

> > Punit Pandey> >

 

 

> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 5:39 PM, vgr pavan <vgr_pavan1 wrote:> > >> >> > Punitji Pranam,> >> >> > Shri KSK neither rejected nor advocated Mars dosha because he didn't have

> > any alternate for marriage matching at that time. He simply shared his> > opinion and left it up to future development. Mars dosha is not alone there> > are many cases that he left untouched for future.

> >> > are you saying that Guruji doesnt have any match making at his time for> > him thats why neither supported nor rejected Mars dosha,> >> > An author like Sri KSK who released an entire book on marriage & progeny (

> > giving highest preference than any set of events ie. money, profession> > etc..) and rejected all types of " poruthams " can not comment on mars dosha> > clearly and left it to his students (not mentioning about that) for further

> > research !> >> > he clearly stated that one should not unnecessarily worry about kuja dosha> > what else will be the proof than this,.> >> > he clearly and straightly asked the points :

> >> > 18. If there is no such dosha in both the horoscopes , is a happy and> > harmonious wedded life guaranteed for a long no.of years ?> >> > 19. as the houses 2,7,11 indicate ones marriage as well as the state of

> > married life , if these houses are occupied by benefics and if mars> > occupies an evil sign , even then will there be any bad effect ?> >> > 20. If the houses 2,7 and 11 are owned by malefics and occupied by malefics

> > and there is no mars dosha , how can the partners lead a prosperous life ?> >> >> > what is your opinion on these questions, Does it mean that KSK didnt know> > answers for these queries and suggested Mars-dosha for match making.

> >> > KSK never told that compatibility analysis for prosperous married life. he> > just asked us to see whether the native is blessed with prosperous married> > life or not, if he has not such luck .......which chart we shall select for

> > him.> >> > KSK always said that see the " praptham " (possibility) not the> > " porutham " (compatibilty)> >> > which his students like M.C.khare, sivapadam etc mentioned in their

> > articles.........> >> > Practically in how many divorced charts we find mars dosham ..........> >> > let us collect those charts and study and look for ourselves.> >

> > I am not Pointing any one , i want to learn more from this debate.....> >> > (frankly speaking your discussion lead to me read this topic again and> > again, thanks for that )> >

> >> > Peace and Prosperity to All !!> >> > VGR> >> > --- On *Tue, 8/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp* wrote:> >> >> > Punit Pandey <punitp > > Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...> > > > Tuesday, 8 December, 2009, 6:42 PM

> >> >> >> > Dear Pavan ji,> >> > According to him the Mars dosha, as it is judged traditionally, is not> > correct. He recommends us to consider those 20 points while judging Mars

> > dosha. This is another differentiator of the article.> >> > He is trying to answer the question which he asked himself. He also says> > that there are people who unnecessary exaggerate Mars dosha without

> > considering 20 given points. In other words, Mars dosha should be judged> > keeping those 20 points in mind.> >> > Does it not mean that he is recommending Mars dosha under some of his

> > recommendations that he kept telling in the article?> >> > It is not rejection, but a correction to traditional understating IMO.> >> > Thanks & Regards,> >

> > Punit Pandey> >> >> > On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 6:16 PM, vgr pavan <vgr_pavan1 (AT) (DOT) co.in<http://mc/compose?to=vgr_pavan1 > > > wrote:> >> >>> >>> >> punitji pranam,> >>> >> waiting for your reply on point 4 .> >>> >> regards

> >>> >>> >> Peace and Prosperity to All !!> >>> >> VGR> >>> >> --- On *Tue, 8/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com<http://mc/compose?to=punitp

> >> >* wrote:> >>> >>> >> Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com<http://mc/compose?to=punitp > >> >> >> Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the years...> >> @gro ups.com<http://mc/compose?to= > > >> Tuesday, 8 December, 2009, 5:29 PM> >>> >>> >>> >> Dear Pavan ji,> >>> >> // I still didnt understand what is the difference between mars dosha for

> >> compatibility and mars causing seperation. //> >> As you know marriage matching is used to decide upon the horoscope of> >> bride or groom. How Mars dosha is used tradionally? Is it used on single

> >> horoscope?> >>> >> Marriage matching is done on two charts. It is not about making some> >> prediction for individual but composite study of impact of two horoscopes on

> >> each other. KP doesn't have any method for marriage matching in readers and> >> hence we can see development of KPDP later.> >>> >> //1.) Our Guruji gave preference to stars but not to the mere placement

> >> in a sign ,(like in vedic astrology). Even in star placements he went> >> further and divided into sub divisions. He proved that the minute> >> subdivisions are responsible in drastic changes in the lifes of the people

> >> born in the same place or twins.> >> In this context how it will be logical to belive that KSK suggested us to> >> verify mars dosha (which deals only with placement in a sign). //

> >> Shri KSK also talked about mere placement of Saturn can cause Punarphoo (http://logy.> >> astrosage. com/punarphoo <http://logy.astrosage.com/punarphoo>).

 

> >> KP readers are full of such examples.> >>> >> I agree it doesn't gel well with KP and I have written a seperate email> >> about it. But it was Shri KSK's choice to include this article. Probably he

> >> found something important and that is the reason we find it in readers. His> >> choice. Contradictions are nothing new in KP readers.> >>> >> //3) why guruji suggested us to judge separately about longevity etc... If

> >> mars dosha can cause widowhood to either.//> >> You missed the point that the appended paragraphs were not conclusion.> >> Please see my discussion with Tw ji and you will find that the conclusion is

> >> the paragraph where Shri KSK sugges weighing Mars Dosha in both the chart.> >>> >> The appended line, as those apply on individual chart, doesn't say> >> anything about Mars dosha in marriage matching. If you will read tradional

> >> astrology books, you will also find application of Mars dosha in> >> individual's horoscope and it is rejected by Shri KSK. The same is also> >> proven by the study.> >>

> >> //then how can we say that ksk advocated Kuja dosha analysis for match> >> making.//> >> Shri KSK neither rejected nor advocated Mars dosha because he didn't have> >> any alternate for marriage matching at that time. He simply shared his

> >> opinion and left it up to future development. Mars dosha is not alone there> >> are many cases that he left untouched for future.> >>> >> Now Mars dosha exists in Astro Secrets (as also shared by Lajmi ji) and

> >> KPDP. Again it is individual's choice to accept or reject it.> >>> >> //therefore it is clear that KSK categorise Mars-dosha and stated his> >> opinion only for those astrologers but not to his followers : //

> >> It is your interpretion. He starts with " let me first of all reproduce the> >> various rules and finally offer my opinion " and at then end of the article> >> he offers his opinion that " It is therefore , necessary that astrologersshould carefully weigh and consider the various points of mars dosha in the > >> given charts and advice on the correct match. " > >>> >> Now if we say that he referred astrologers to some other astrologers and> >> not to his followers will be stretching it too far. He simply didn't have

> >> any alternate method of marriage matching and hence he draw that conclusion.> >> Accept it or reject it is our choice, though it is the fact that KP readers> >> do not offer any method for marriage matching. Lajmi ji vociferously

> >> advocate KPDP and I guess there are some other methods available as well if> >> we see later KP literature. Need of KPDP tells absense of marriage matching> >> method in KP.> >>

> >> What you are saying doesn't seem correct because of Shri KSK's nature of> >> bluntly rejected the methods that doesn't work. He didn't reject it in the> >> whole article. He is clearly recommending it to astrologers from above

> >> conclusion. Now assuming that these are some other astrologers and not KP> >> followers, still he is recommending it to those astrologers and not> >> rejecting it. I do not remember any other place in readers where Shri KSK

> >> has recommended some method to some astrologers and not to his followers.> >> After all the readers are written for his followers and not for some other> >> astrologers.> >>

> >> Thanks & Regards,> >>> >> Punit Pandey> >>> >>> >> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:02 PM, vgr pavan <vgr_pavan1 (AT) (DOT) co.in<http://mc/compose?to=vgr_pavan1

 

> >> > wrote:> >>> >>>> >>>> >>> Punitji Pranam,> >>>> >>> I still didnt understand what is the difference between mars dosha for

> >>> compatibility and mars causing seperation.> >>>> >>> 1.) Our Guruji gave preference to stars but not to the mere placement in> >>> a sign ,(like in vedic astrology). Even in star placements he went further

> >>> and divided into sub divisions. He proved that the minute subdivisions are> >>> responsible in drastic changes in the lifes of the people born in the same> >>> place or twins.

> >>> In this context how it will be logical to belive that KSK suggested us to> >>> verify mars dosha (which deals only with placement in a sign).> >>>> >>> 2) KSK in many instances told that every one has to face the good or bad

> >>> events in his life based upon the meritorious deeds done in his previous> >>> birth and no chart has influence on others life. then how will be to think> >>> that mars placement in wifes chart will cause problems even though husbands

> >>> chart indicating hormonious wedded life !> >>>> >>> 3) why guruji suggested us to judge separately about longevity etc... If> >>> mars dosha can cause widowhood to either.

> >>>> >>> 4) p.no. 52. Guruji stated as follows :> >>>> >>> One may ask, ' " why should they attach too much importance to the position

> >>> of mars alone ? we had never heard anybody taking of moon`s dosha or any> >>> other planet`s dosha or sun`s dosha or any other planets dosha . then does> >>> it mean that mars alone will do so much harm to the couple to the couple

> >>> which other planets cannot do " ?> >>>> >>> the reply is that there are some people who unnecessarily exaggerate the> >>> evil results of mars. Most of the following points are not taken into

> >>> consideration he stated 20 points against kuja dosha:> >>>> >>>> >>> then how can we say that ksk advocated Kuja dosha analysis for match> >>> making.

> >>>> >>> the reason for the para by Guruji as shown by you is that (as i feel)> >>>> >>>> >>> in the starting of the concept p.no. 55 :

> >>>> >>>> >>> " when parents attempt to fix the marriage of their sons and the> >>> daughters, the so called mars dosha , interpreted by astrologersaccording to their whims and fancies , confuses them due to varying opinion > >>> given by them. " > >>>> >>>> >>> after few lines :> >>>> >>> " let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my

> >>> opinion " :> >>>> >>> thats why he divided mars-dosha into three groups and said the anology of> >>> blood group (because ksk tries to say that we has to match the chart having

> >>> kuja dosha with a chart having similar dosha but not the other two> >>> variants,)> >>>> >>> therefore it is clear that KSK categorise Mars-dosha and stated his

> >>> opinion only for those astrologers but not to his followers :> >>>> >>>> >>> " It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and

> >>> consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on> >>> the correct match " > >>>> >>> As per the mails of tinwinji i understood that the topic ended here, and

> >>> later the last few paras were inserted So as to let the readers know how> >>> K.P. followers look at these " doshas " by taking only the sub-level> >>> significations and not the mere placement of mars in different signs.

> >>>> >>> hope i am clear.> >>>> >>> i am not critising any one this iis what i understood about this concept.> >>>> >>> Guruji bless us all.

> >>>> >>>> >>> Peace and Prosperity to All !!> >>>> >>> VGR> >>>> >>> --- On *Mon, 7/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com<http://mc/compose?to=punitp

> >>> >* wrote:> >>>> >>>> >>> Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com<http://mc/compose?to=punitp > >>> >> >>> Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the> >>> years...> >>> @gro ups.com<http://mc/compose?to= >

 

> >>> Monday, 7 December, 2009, 12:50 AM> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Dear Pavan ji,> >>>> >>> It seem you are also mixing up two things. The Mars dosha section talks

> >>> about two points -> >>> 1. Mars dosha for marriage matching> >>> 2. Mars dosha for predicting " difference of opinion, disagreement,> >>> dispute "

> >>>> >>> The section that has been appended later on in 1971 edition (starting> >>> from - To cause different of opinion ....) is for using Mars dosha for> >>> predicting difference of opinion, disagreement, disputes etc. Shri KSK

> >>> himself clearly mentioned that any planet can do that. The study also proved> >>> the same point which Shri KSK has said. If you read my earlier email, I> >>> appreciated study for proving this point.

> >>>> >>> Though my point is that study didn't touch Mars dosha in marriage> >>> matching. Shri KSK said -> >>> " It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh and

> >>> consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise on> >>> the correct match. " > >>>> >>> It is clearly Shri KSK's opinion for using Mars dosha in " marriage

> >>> matching " and not predicting on individual's horoscope. Point 1 (Mars dosha> >>> in marriage matching) was suggested by Shri KSK but not touched by study. My> >>> reason for writing the email was that people should not confuse that the

> >>> study rejected both - mars dosha in prediction and mars dosha in marriage> >>> matching. The truth is that the study touched only mars dosha in prediction> >>> on individual's chart.

> >>>> >>> Generally Shri KSK was very truthful and blunt in calling a spade a> >>> spade. If he found that something is not working, he bluntly said that.> >>> Though when he says something to " weigh and consider various points of Mars

> >>> Dosha " , we should listen him till the time some study proves otherwise. We> >>> will have to wait for a study that checks bride and groom's chart> >>> simultaneously and conclude something. I hope now you got my point.

> >>>> >>> I do not have 1966 edition with me. Tw ji said that upto " It is,> >>> therefore, ... " is reprint of earlier edition of 1966. Which means " It is,> >>> therefore, ... " was the actual conclusion by Shri KSK and I do not think

> >>> that there should be any doubt on it. He starts with that I'll tell you my> >>> opinion and finally he offers this opinion to " weigh and consider various> >>> points of Mars Dosha " .

> >>>> >>> Thanks & Regards,> >>>> >>> Punit Pandey> >>>> >>>> >>> On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 11:27 PM, vgr pavan <vgr_pavan1 (AT) (DOT) co.in<http://mc/compose?to=vgr_pavan1

 

> >>> > wrote:> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Punitji pranam,> >>>>> >>>> Pardon for interfering ....

> >>>>> >>>> the qoute in reader 4 is> >>>>> >>>> " To cause difference of opinion,> >>>> disagreement, dispute, divorce etc. among the couple it is not left

> >>>> to Mars alone, any planet can cause such undesirable effect provided> >>>> they happen to be deposited in such a position, that the sublord of> >>>> the planet is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 or the sublord is

> >>>> deposited in a constellation, the lord of which is the significator> >>>> of 6 or 10 or 12 " .> >>>>> >>>> Guruji , also stressed that " any planet can cause " such " undesirable

> >>>> effect , So he is telling> >>>> that we need not give preference to " Mars " alone , any planet can cause> >>>> such results.> >>>>

> >>>> Again in the next para> >>>>> >>>> " If the sub lord is mars or if it is in the constellation of mars ,> >>>> and if is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 , there will be separation. If

> >>>> it is saturn , silence and remain dumb-stick and strike. thus we have to> >>>> predict. " > >>>>> >>>> here also he said " separation " will be caused by mars only when he is

> >>>> sublord or sub tenanted star lord and significator for 6,10,12. but not> >>>> with mere placement of mars in various signs from asc, moon, venus.> >>>>> >>>> [in P.no. 194 under the head " Divorce "

> >>>>> >>>> " there is no mars dosha in this chart because it is in a movable sign ,> >>>> it is debilitated ; conjoined with mercury . Yet look at the fate . thus

> >>>> taking the position of mars and offering predictions which appear more like> >>>> a curse is not correct . but take the planets situated in the star or sub> >>>> of mars in 1,2,4,8,12 ,. then , that planet tenanted in such a mars star

> >>>> will offer undesirable and disagreeable results.]> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> point no. 3 " Shri KSK clearly mentioned it for compatibility matching

> >>>> " > >>>>> >>>> i think you are pointing the para above the para given by me, it reads> >>>> as follows:> >>>>> >>>> " It is therefore , necessary that astrologers should carefully weigh and

> >>>> consider the various points of mars dosha in the given charts and advice on> >>>> the correct match " :> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> in the starting of this explanation on mars dosha P.no.55 KSK mentioned

> >>>> that :> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> " Let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my> >>>> opinion. "

> >>>>> >>>> So i think that upto the above para (p.no. 69 ) is what Gurujis> >>>> explanation about various rules and the later paragraphs are his " final "

> >>>> opinion.(which are last paras of the topic) .> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> point no.4> >>>>> >>>> guruji explained what vedic astrological rules for " Mars Dosha " are .

> >>>> but not instructed us to follow the same.> >>>>> >>>> These are my opinions .......> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Peace and Prosperity to All !!

> >>>>> >>>> VGR> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> --- On *Sun, 6/12/09, Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com<http://mc/compose?to=punitp

> >>>> >* wrote:> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Punit Pandey <punitp (AT) gmail (DOT) com<http://mc/compose?to=punitp > >>>> >> >>>> Re: FW: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the> >>>> years...> >>>>> >>>> @gro ups.com<http://mc/compose?to= >

 

> >>>> Sunday, 6 December, 2009, 9:40 PM> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Dear Tw ji,> >>>>

> >>>> 1. Please tell clearly whether you are saying that 1966 is more> >>>> authentic or 1971. I do not understand the reason for initial 6 points.> >>>> 2. Even in 1971 edition, when we say that " .... it can not be left to

> >>>> Mars alone " , it clearly means that Mars has impact, but it is not the " only " > >>>> reason. Shri KSK were very clear about the impact of Mars dosha and that is> >>>> the rason instead of rejecting it (which he has done quite often in readers

> >>>> for some other theories like Ashtakvarga) , he said that this is not the> >>>> reason " alone. " > >>>> 3. Regarding point 7, the question is not whether everything is

> >>>> pre-destined or not. The question is whether it is correct to check Mars> >>>> dosha on indiviaul's chart where Shri KSK clearly mentioned it for> >>>> compatibility matching. Any conclusion drawn without considered both the

> >>>> partner's horoscope seems incomplete to me and against what Shri KSK has> >>>> mentioned about it.> >>>> 4. You also didn't answer my question, whether Moon and Venus were

> >>>> considered or not, apart from Ascendant, in the study? We must remember that> >>>> Shri KSK clearly mentioned about inclusion of Moon and Venus with Ascendant> >>>> while judging Mars dosha.

> >>>> 5. What ideas you are finding speculative? I am just quoting what Shri> >>>> KSK has said and what proof you need more than what Shri KSK has said> >>>> himself.

> >>>>> >>>> My objections and questions doesn't mean that I am try to belittle the> >>>> study. The study is useful and establish that Mars dosha has limited or no

> >>>> value when it comes to predicting disagreement, dispute, and divorce etc. in> >>>> marriage. It is a good and useful finding. Though the study doesn't tell> >>>> anything about Mars dosha compatibility and we should be very clear about

> >>>> it. Most of the problems are said when Mars dosha doesn't match in bride and> >>>> groom's chart and this is the utility of this theory in Hindu astrology (and> >>>> Indian families). Also, in future study must be extended to include Moon and

> >>>> Venus, so that it can test the real definition of Mars dosha and not just an> >>>> incomplete definition of Mars dosha. Till the time the scope of study is> >>>> clear, people may confuse and think that Mars dosha is match making doesn't

> >>>> exist which is actually not convered in the study.> >>>>> >>>> Thanks & Regards,> >>>>> >>>> Punit Pandey> >>>>

> >>>>> >>>> On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 8:55 PM, TW <tw853 <http://mc/compose?to=tw853

 

> >>>> > wrote:> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Dear Friends,> >>>>>> >>>>> 1. Mars dosha has been written in the KP Reader IV (Marriage, Married

> >>>>> Life & Children) pages 51-69 (any Edition of reprinting).> >>>>> 2. Page 52, second and third paras> >>>>> One may ask, " Why should they attach so much importance to the position

> >>>>> of Mars alone? .......> >>>>> The reply is that there are some people who unnessarily exaggerate the> >>>>> evil results of Mars.....> >>>>> 3. Page 55, third para

> >>>>> Let me first of all reproduce the various rules and finally offer my> >>>>> opinion.> >>>>> 4. Page 69 fourth para> >>>>> It is, therefore, necessary that Astrologers should carefully weigh and

> >>>>> consider the various points of Mars Dosha in the given charts and advise on> >>>>> the correct match.> >>>>> 5. Up to the above para is reprinted from the early writtings in the

> >>>>> Krishnamurti Padhdhati Vol II, Sagar publications, 1966.> >>>>> 6. Page 69 fourth to sixth paras are added in the mentioned KP Reader> >>>>> IV, first published in May 1971; fourth para is as given under:

> >>>>> To cause difference of opinion,disagreemen t, dispute, divorce etc.> >>>>> among the couple it is not left to Mars alone, any planet can cause such> >>>>> undesirable effect provided they happen to be deposited in such a position,

> >>>>> that the sublord of the planet is the significator of 6 or 10 or 12 or the> >>>>> sublord is deposited in a constellation, the lord of which is the> >>>>> significator of 6 or 10 or 12.

> >>>>> 7. In KP, marriage matching, like education, occupation,death, is> >>>>> supposed to be predestined.> >>>>> 8. The speculative ideas would be sound, if and only if supported by a

> >>>>> research study of sufficient numbers of charts other than here say> >>>>> experience or opinion.> >>>>>> >>>>> Thanks and regards,

> >>>>>> >>>>> TW> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> @gro ups.com<http://mc/compose?to= >, > >>>>> Punit Pandey <punitp@> wrote:> >>>>> >> >>>>> > Dear Tw ji,> >>>>> >> >>>>> > I personally feel that the study missed few very basic but important

> >>>>> points> >>>>> > and I would like to mention the same -> >>>>> >> >>>>> > 1. Problems due to Mars Dosha, tradionally as well as narrated by

> >>>>> Shri KSK (> >>>>> > http://logy. astrosage. com/mars- dosha<http://logy.astrosage.com/mars-dosha>),

 

> >>>>> occurs only when the husband> >>>>> > and wife do not have same level of dosha. The problem exists only if> >>>>> a> >>>>> > person having Mars dosha marries to the person who doesn't have Mars

> >>>>> dosha> >>>>> > (even if we ignore level of dosha). The study seems to consider> >>>>> > only individual's chart and not two charts together. If it is

> >>>>> studying> >>>>> > only individual's chart, the study doesn't have much meaning. A study> >>>>> needs> >>>>> > to see Mars dosha in two situation and compare - a) mars dosha person

> >>>>> > marriying to mars dosha person, b) mars dosha person not marring to> >>>>> Mars> >>>>> > dosha person. Till the time we compare this two situation, how come

> >>>>> we> >>>>> > conclude whether Mars Dosha works or not.> >>>>> >> >>>>> > 2. Traditonally as well as according to Shri KSK, Mars dosha should

> >>>>> be> >>>>> > checked from Ascendant, Moon and Venus. It seems that study is> >>>>> considering> >>>>> > only Ascedant and ignoring Moon and Venus. Again, if we do not follow

> >>>>> the> >>>>> > definition properly, the conclusion reached can not be called> >>>>> correct.> >>>>> >> >>>>> > Here is the conclusion from your article -

> >>>>> > " It is to follow the KP rules only in considering longevity,> >>>>> matching,> >>>>> > separation, divorce, multi-marriage, happy or unhappy married life

> >>>>> etc.> >>>>> > without mixing up with the traditional Manglik-to- Manglik matching> >>>>> rule and> >>>>> > explain the public not to worry about Mars Dosha as suggested by Shri

> >>>>> K.> >>>>> > Hariharan. " > >>>>> >> >>>>> > Here again it seems that we are mixing up two things. KP does NOT> >>>>> provide

> >>>>> > any tool for chart matching and Mars dosha is a tool for matching and> >>>>> not> >>>>> > for prediction. KP clearly gives the rule for longevity etc., but

> >>>>> doesn't> >>>>> > tell much about matching two charts. There is no doubt that KP is> >>>>> dependent> >>>>> > on traditional methods of horoscope matching as far as KP readers are

> >>>>> > concerned. This is the reason Koota as well as Mars dosha found place> >>>>> in KP.> >>>>> > In my opinion, the study is about Mars dosha as a predictive tool

> >>>>> (which is> >>>>> > not discussed by Shri KSK) and NOT Mars dosha as a matching tool> >>>>> (which is> >>>>> > discussed by Shri KSK).

> >>>>> >> >>>>> > Thanks & Regards,> >>>>> >> >>>>> > Punit Pandey> >>>>> >> >>>>> >

> >>>>> > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 11:51 PM, TW tw853@ wrote:> >>>>> >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > > Dear Friends,

> >>>>> > > What has been found is in the File section under:> >>>>> > > MARS DOSHA IN KP.doc> >>>>> > > Regards,> >>>>> > > TW

> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > > @gro ups.com<http://mc/compose?to= ><%40.

> >>>>> com <http://40/>>, Punit > >>>>>> >>>>> > > Pandey punitp@ wrote:> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > > Dear Friends,> >>>>> > > >

> >>>>> > > > Here is what is found in third reader -> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > > http://logy. astrosage. com/mars- dosha<http://logy.astrosage.com/mars-dosha> > >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > > Thanks & Regards,> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > > Punit Pandey

> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Ramani kadavasalramani@ wrote:> >>>>> > > >

> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > > Dear Shri Bansalj,> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > > Any kind of Mars Dosha including the Mars in 4th fron Lagna or> >>>>> Moon or> >>>>> > > > > Venus gets cancelled when Mars is aspected by Saturn.

> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > > Truly yours,> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > > K.S.V.Ramani> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > > ------------ --------- ---------> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > > ** @gro ups.com<http://mc/compose?to= ><%40.

> >>>>> com <http://40/>>[> >>>>> > > @gro ups.com<http://mc/compose?to= ><%40.

> >>>>> com <http://40/>>] *On > >>>>>> >>>>> > > > > Behalf Of *pankaj bansal> >>>>> > > > > *Sent:* 04 December 2009 22:50> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > > *To:* @gro ups.com<http://mc/compose?to= ><%40.

> >>>>> com <http://40/>> > >>>>>> >>>>> > > > > *Subject:* Re: MARS DOSHA...my experience over the> >>>>> > > years...> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > > Namaste Lajmiji,

> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > > If Mars is placed In 4th house from> >>>>> > > > > Lagna & Venus and Placed in POORVASHADA Nakshatra(Venus) .Then

> >>>>> there is No> >>>>> > > So> >>>>> > > > > called Mars dosha and the Native Can Marriage anybody who had> >>>>> or had

> >>>>> > > not> >>>>> > > > > mars dosha in this Birth Chart?Eagerly waiting for your> >>>>> precious> >>>>> > > response.

> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > > Thanks> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > > ------------ --------- ---------

> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > > ** Yogesh Lajmi yogeshlajmi@> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > > *To:* @gro ups.com<http://mc/compose?to= ><%40.

> >>>>> com <http://40/>>

 

> >>>>>> >>>>> > > > > *Cc:* Punit Pandey punitp@> >>>>> > > > > *Sent:* Fri, 4 December, 2009 8:05:18 PM> >>>>> > >

> >>>>> > > > > *Subject:* MARS DOSHA...my experience over the> >>>>> years...> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > > Dear Members,> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > > Not withstanding what has been averred by some " K.P.

> >>>>> > > > > research scholars " ,> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > > and whose research has been qestioned already in these columns

> >>>>> by many> >>>>> > > KP> >>>>> > > > > followers,> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > > *and also,*my own experience about Mars Dosha,over the

> >>>>> years,and after> >>>>> > > > > analysing the charts of many a married couples,for marital> >>>>> > > > > problems,especially ,after marriage,I agree 100% with the

> >>>>> observation> >>>>> > > in> >>>>> > > > > K.P. books that *Mars posited in Sun's star,or own star,and> >>>>> occuping

> >>>>> > > > > houses I,II,IV,VII, VIII & XII** **alone causes Mars> >>>>> Dosha**...*> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > > I invite the opinion of all members...on this very

> >>>>> > > > > controversial matter,and I must add here that almost ALL of my> >>>>> clients> >>>>> > > who> >>>>> > > > > come to consult me,strongly believe about the existence of Mars

> >>>>> > > Dosha...so> >>>>> > > > > much so that they attribute almost every domestic problem to> >>>>> the> >>>>> > > existence

> >>>>> > > > > of Mars Dosha,and keep asking for * " remedies " .. .* !> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > > Which I patiently have to explain in detail...based

> >>>>> > > > > on their own experience in the practise of the K.P. System...> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > > This is just to illustrate how deeply the ill-effects

> >>>>> > > > > of Mars are embedded in the minds of people,at large...> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > > Am looking forward to comments from discerning

> >>>>> > > > > members...> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > > With kind regards,> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > > Yogesh Lajmi.> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > > * *> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > > ------------ --------- ---------> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > > Win 1 of 4 Sony home entertainment packs thanks to 7.

> >>>>> Enter now<> >>>>> > > http://us.lrd. / _ylc=X3oDMTJxN2x 2ZmNpBF9zAzIwMjM

> >>>>> 2MTY2MTMEdG1fZG1 lY2gDVGV4dCBMaW5 rBHRtX2xuawNVMTE wMzk3NwR0bV9uZXQ> >>>>> DWWFob28hBHRtX3B vcwN0YWdsaW5lBHR tX3BwdHkDYXVueg- -/SIG=14600t3ni/> >>>>> **http%3A/ au.rd.. com/mail/ tagline/sony/ *http%3A/ au.docs..

> >>>>> com/homepageset/ %3Fp1=other% 26p2=au%26p3= mailtagline<http://us.lrd./_ylc=X3oDMTJxN2x2ZmNpBF9zAzIwMjM2MTY2MTMEdG1fZG1lY2gDVGV4dCBMaW5rBHRtX2xuawNVMTEwMzk3NwR0bV9uZXQDWWFob28hBHRtX3BvcwN0YWdsaW5lBHRtX3BwdHkDYXVueg--/SIG=14600t3ni/**http%3A/au.rd./mail/tagline/sony/*http%3A/au.docs./homepageset/%3Fp1=other%26p2=au%26p3=mailtagline> > >>>>>> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > > > > .> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > > ------------ --------- ---------> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > > The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your

> >>>>> Homepage<> >>>>> > > http://in.rd. / tagline_yyi_ 1/*http:/ in.. com/<http://in.rd./tagline_yyi_1/*http:/in./>

> >>>>> >> >>>>> > > > > .> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > >> >>>>> > > > >

> >>>>> > > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> >> >>>>>

> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> ------------------------------ > >>>> The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage<http://in.rd./tagline_yyi_1/*http://in./>.

> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> ------------------------------> >>> The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage<http://in.rd./tagline_yyi_1/*http://in./>

> >>> .> >>>> >>>> >>> >> ------------------------------> >> The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage<http://in.rd./tagline_yyi_1/*http://in./>

> >> .> >>> >>> >> > ------------------------------> > The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Homepage<http://in.rd./tagline_yyi_1/*http://in./>

> > .> >> > > >>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...