Guest guest Posted August 7, 2008 Report Posted August 7, 2008 Hello dear Sankara, I add my replies to your questions in your message appended below. Best wishes. - Sankara SAMVA Thursday, August 07, 2008 12:57 PM Further Qs: Strength of planets Dear Vyasji, Namasthe.Thanks for this very useful SA Table of Strengths.Here are a few Qs however: Q1: What does SLH/L mean and DH mean? SLH/L MEANS SUN LIKE HOUSE OR THE SIGN LEO. Q2: As placement in a malefic H["bad-placement"]reduces the strength of a badly-placed planet only to the extent of 50%, does it mean then that all afflicted planets, when "otherwise strong" are only 50% weakened? [i ask this Q, as the Professor has said that bad-placement is itself tantamount to an affliction.] YES. Q3: The degree of weakenning must depend on the severity of the affliction, the planet suffers. For example, what would be the difference in the degree of weakness, when a planet is afflicted by just one FM, as against, when it is afflicted by the MMP[or by both Nodes, for that matter]? IN THE CASE OF MULTIPLE AFFLICTIONS THE DANGER OF HARM IS MUCH MORE. Q4: Sometimes in Professor's books, I have come across afflictions of very grievous kinds-such as afflictions by three or four FMs.What would be the % loss of strength[degree of weakness], in such cases of severe multiple afflictions? DEGREE OF WEAKNESS MAY BE 75% WITH VULNERABILITY TO HARM QUITE HIGHT. I am also left wondering what 's final verdict on these Qs will be? HOPE THE ABOVE REPLIES HELP YOU. Best regards Sankara Address:"Ashirvad", 2/507, III Cross street,Sunrise Avenue, Neelangarai, Chennai - 600041.Ph#s: 91 44 24491233; Mob:9884010548 email: sankara (AT) hinduworldastrology (DOT) netwebsite: www.hinduworldastrology.net - "Vyas Munidas" <munidas (AT) rogers (DOT) com> <SAMVA > Wednesday, August 06, 2008 9:46 PM Re: Remark: Strength of planets > Dear Sankaraji,> > Here's my list so far from all the conversations on strength and weakness:> > SLH/L +25%> Leo +25%> Debilitated -50%> Exhalted +25%> Badly placed -50%> Closely combust FM sun -75%> Closely combust FB Sun +25% (Can promote in life)> Closely combust FB Sun -50% (cannot protect in transit affliction)> D9 Debilitation -25%> Comb and deb. in DH -90%> Deb. and in DH -75%> weak pl. in aff. H -75%> strong pl. in aff. H -50%> closely aff. and weak -75%> closely aff. but strong -50%> D9 deb. and in DH -60%> In D9: DH and deb -40%> MTH afflicted -75%> Strength cannot exceed that of dispositor> > > Outstanding in my mind are the strength gains, if any:> > In own MTH?> In own sign?> On MEP?> > > Best regards,> > Vyas Munidas> > - > "Sankara" <sankara (AT) hinduworldastrology (DOT) net>> <SAMVA >> Wednesday, August 06, 2008 7:48 AM> Remark: Strength of planets> > > Dear Prof Choudhry and Sri Vyasji,> > Namasthe.Thank you for these 5 new sutras-they have immediately answered > some long standing questions and enigmas that I have had- pertaining to the > contexts in which such sutras apply.> warm regards> > Sankara> > Address:> "Ashirvad", 2/507, III Cross street,> Sunrise Avenue, Neelangarai, Chennai - 600041.> Ph#s: 91 44 24491233; Mob:9884010548> > email: sankara (AT) hinduworldastrology (DOT) net> website: www.hinduworldastrology.net> > - > "SIHA" <vkchoudhry >> <SAMVA >> Wednesday, August 06, 2008 8:12 AM> Re: Strength of planets> > >> Hello dear Vyas,>>>> You may rephrase your question, if necessary after going through the>> following:>>>> a) A planet will lose strength to the>>>> extent of 75% if its mooltrikona sign>>>> house is afflicted.>>>> b) A weak planet placed in an afflicted>>>> house will lose strength to the extent of>>>> 75%.>>>> c) An otherwise strong planet placed in a>>>> non mooltrikona sign afflicted house will>>>> lose strength to the extent of 50%. Such>>>> a planet may give good results in the>>>> first place and will cause setbacks>>>> later.>>>> d) A closely afflicted weak planet will>>>> lose strength to the extent of>>>> 75%.>>>> e) The strength of a planet will not exceed the strength of its >> dispositor.>>>> Best wishes.>>>> >>>>>>>> - >> "Vyas Munidas" <munidas (AT) rogers (DOT) com>>> <SAMVA >>> Wednesday, August 06, 2008 5:26 AM>> Re: To - stellar day for US stocks>>>>>>> Dear Professor,>>>>>> This question wasn't particularly directed towards the stock market in >>> the>>> USA. I should have asked it separately.>>>>>> In any given Gemini, Cancer, or Sg chart with an exactly afflicted Leo,>>> but>>> the Sun is strong on all other accounts and there are planets placed in>>> Leo,>>> we do not consider a 50% reduction in strength of those planets. Correct?>>> Certainly tensions arise from other afflicted house(s), and connects the>>> afflicting planet with that Leo house and can be telling of a tragic >>> event>>> to occur in that connection. However, 100% strength should still be>>> present>>> throughout life, for the most part.>>>>>>>>> Best regards,>>>>>> Vyas Munidas>>>>>> - >>> "SIHA" <vkchoudhry >>>> <SAMVA >>>> Tuesday, August 05, 2008 7:43 PM>>> Re: To - stellar day for US stocks>>>>>>>>> Hello dear Vyas,>>>>>> The transit Sun and the Moon in the 3H are the helpful elements now.>>>>>> Best wishes.>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> - >>> Vyas Munidas>>> SAMVA >>> Wednesday, August 06, 2008 4:49 AM>>> Re: To - stellar day for US stocks>>>>>>>>> Dear Thor,>>>>>> This question only uses the USA as an example for a deeper astrological>>> wondering.>>>>>> Certainly there are many other elements at play, in particular the>>> afflicted>>> 10H, afflicted 10L and weak Mercury that contribute. Transit Sun is the>>> helpful element now.>>>>>> Best regards,>>>>>> Vyas Munidas>>>>>> - >>> "Cosmologer" <cosmologer >>>> <SAMVA >>>> Tuesday, August 05, 2008 6:44 PM>>> Re: To - stellar day for US stocks>>>>>> Dear Vyas,>>> Allow me to interject two observations.>>> 1. The conditions are still not rosy. Despite the rise in the share >>> price>>> today, their level is still considerably lower than only 2 months ago.>>> 2. Some months ago, predicted continued volatility >>> for>>> the remainder of the year. So far, this prediction is spot on.>>> Best wishes,>>> Thor>>>>>> >>> Vyas Munidas <munidas (AT) rogers (DOT) com>>>> SAMVA >>> Tuesday, August 5, 2008 10:24:36 PM>>> To - stellar day for US stocks>>>>>> Dear Professor,>>>>>> Jupiter exactly afflicts the 2H of the USA. Such and influence causes a>>> loss>>> of 50%, but being in the sign Leo and the 2H, they gain 50%. So do we>>> consider the effect of Jupiter here as completely negated?>>>>>> Best regards,>>>>>> Vyas Munidas>>>>>> - >>> "Cosmologer" <cosmologer >>>> <samva >>>> Tuesday, August 05, 2008 5:37 PM>>> A stellar day for US stocks>>>>>> Dear friends,>>> After a rather long period of adverse developments, with the stock >>> market>>> declining from late May through June and then remaining in range in>>> choppy>>> trading since, the stock market had an exceptionaly stellar day today,>>> with>>> the Dow Jones Industrial Average and other stock indexes rising almost>>> 3%.>>> That said, at 11,615, the Dow is still 12% below its late May peak of>>> 13,136.>>> The good news prompting todays rally was the ongoing sharp decline in >>> oil>>> prices, to $118 per barrel and the decision by the Federal Reserve to >>> not>>> raise its interest rates. This comes on the heels of another piece of>>> good>>> news recently, that the US economy expanded 1.9% in the 2nd quarter of>>> the>>> year.>>> In the SAMVA USA chart (Perpetual Union), the favourable development is>>> seen>>> in most of the functional benefics being well placed in transit and>>> mostly>>> free of close afflictions by natal or transit FM planets at this time. >>> In>>> particular, the conjunction of transit 2nd lord Sun with the 1st house>>> MEP>>> would be expected to temporarily boost the sense of well being. However,>>> later this week the transit Sun becomes conjunct the stationary nodal>>> axis>>> its indications are likely to suffer - due to also ongoing affliction of>>> natal Sun by the transit stationary nodal axis and the aspect of transit>>> 6th>>> lord Jupiter to the 2nd house.>>> Best wishes,>>> Thor>>>>>> --->>>>>> Quote
Guest guest Posted August 7, 2008 Report Posted August 7, 2008 Dear Sankaraji, Namaste. You're welcome. And thanks to for answering the questions already! Best regards, Vyas Munidas - " Sankara " <sankara <SAMVA > Thursday, August 07, 2008 3:27 AM Further Qs: Strength of planets Dear Vyasji, Namasthe.Thanks for this very useful SA Table of Strengths.Here are a few Qs however: Q1: What does SLH/L mean and DH mean? Q2: As placement in a malefic H[ " bad-placement " ]reduces the strength of a badly-placed planet only to the extent of 50%, does it mean then that all afflicted planets, when " otherwise strong " are only 50% weakened? [i ask this Q, as the Professor has said that bad-placement is itself tantamount to an affliction.] Q3: The degree of weakenning must depend on the severity of the affliction, the planet suffers. For example, what would be the difference in the degree of weakness, when a planet is afflicted by just one FM, as against, when it is afflicted by the MMP[or by both Nodes, for that matter]? Q4: Sometimes in Professor's books, I have come across afflictions of very grievous kinds-such as afflictions by three or four FMs.What would be the % loss of strength[degree of weakness], in such cases of severe multiple afflictions? I am also left wondering what 's final verdict on these Qs will be? Best regards Sankara Address: " Ashirvad " , 2/507, III Cross street, Sunrise Avenue, Neelangarai, Chennai - 600041. Ph#s: 91 44 24491233; Mob:9884010548 email: sankara website: www.hinduworldastrology.net - " Vyas Munidas " <muni> <SAMVA > Wednesday, August 06, 2008 9:46 PM Re: Remark: Strength of planets > Dear Sankaraji, > > Here's my list so far from all the conversations on strength and weakness: > > SLH/L +25% > Leo +25% > Debilitated -50% > Exhalted +25% > Badly placed -50% > Closely combust FM sun -75% > Closely combust FB Sun +25% (Can promote in life) > Closely combust FB Sun -50% (cannot protect in transit affliction) > D9 Debilitation -25% > Comb and deb. in DH -90% > Deb. and in DH -75% > weak pl. in aff. H -75% > strong pl. in aff. H -50% > closely aff. and weak -75% > closely aff. but strong -50% > D9 deb. and in DH -60% > In D9: DH and deb -40% > MTH afflicted -75% > Strength cannot exceed that of dispositor > > > Outstanding in my mind are the strength gains, if any: > > In own MTH? > In own sign? > On MEP? > > > Best regards, > > Vyas Munidas > > - > " Sankara " <sankara > <SAMVA > > Wednesday, August 06, 2008 7:48 AM > Remark: Strength of planets > > > Dear Prof Choudhry and Sri Vyasji, > > Namasthe.Thank you for these 5 new sutras-they have immediately answered > some long standing questions and enigmas that I have had- pertaining to > the > contexts in which such sutras apply. > warm regards > > Sankara > > Address: > " Ashirvad " , 2/507, III Cross street, > Sunrise Avenue, Neelangarai, Chennai - 600041. > Ph#s: 91 44 24491233; Mob:9884010548 > > email: sankara > website: www.hinduworldastrology.net > > - > " SIHA " <vkchoudhry > <SAMVA > > Wednesday, August 06, 2008 8:12 AM > Re: Strength of planets > > >> Hello dear Vyas, >> >> You may rephrase your question, if necessary after going through the >> following: >> >> a) A planet will lose strength to the >> >> extent of 75% if its mooltrikona sign >> >> house is afflicted. >> >> b) A weak planet placed in an afflicted >> >> house will lose strength to the extent of >> >> 75%. >> >> c) An otherwise strong planet placed in a >> >> non mooltrikona sign afflicted house will >> >> lose strength to the extent of 50%. Such >> >> a planet may give good results in the >> >> first place and will cause setbacks >> >> later. >> >> d) A closely afflicted weak planet will >> >> lose strength to the extent of >> >> 75%. >> >> e) The strength of a planet will not exceed the strength of its >> dispositor. >> >> Best wishes. >> >> >> >> >> >> - >> " Vyas Munidas " <muni> >> <SAMVA > >> Wednesday, August 06, 2008 5:26 AM >> Re: To - stellar day for US stocks >> >> >>> Dear Professor, >>> >>> This question wasn't particularly directed towards the stock market in >>> the >>> USA. I should have asked it separately. >>> >>> In any given Gemini, Cancer, or Sg chart with an exactly afflicted Leo, >>> but >>> the Sun is strong on all other accounts and there are planets placed in >>> Leo, >>> we do not consider a 50% reduction in strength of those planets. >>> Correct? >>> Certainly tensions arise from other afflicted house(s), and connects the >>> afflicting planet with that Leo house and can be telling of a tragic >>> event >>> to occur in that connection. However, 100% strength should still be >>> present >>> throughout life, for the most part. >>> >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Vyas Munidas >>> >>> - >>> " SIHA " <vkchoudhry >>> <SAMVA > >>> Tuesday, August 05, 2008 7:43 PM >>> Re: To - stellar day for US stocks >>> >>> >>> Hello dear Vyas, >>> >>> The transit Sun and the Moon in the 3H are the helpful elements now. >>> >>> Best wishes. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> - >>> Vyas Munidas >>> SAMVA >>> Wednesday, August 06, 2008 4:49 AM >>> Re: To - stellar day for US stocks >>> >>> >>> Dear Thor, >>> >>> This question only uses the USA as an example for a deeper astrological >>> wondering. >>> >>> Certainly there are many other elements at play, in particular the >>> afflicted >>> 10H, afflicted 10L and weak Mercury that contribute. Transit Sun is the >>> helpful element now. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Vyas Munidas >>> >>> - >>> " Cosmologer " <cosmologer >>> <SAMVA > >>> Tuesday, August 05, 2008 6:44 PM >>> Re: To - stellar day for US stocks >>> >>> Dear Vyas, >>> Allow me to interject two observations. >>> 1. The conditions are still not rosy. Despite the rise in the share >>> price >>> today, their level is still considerably lower than only 2 months ago. >>> 2. Some months ago, predicted continued volatility >>> for >>> the remainder of the year. So far, this prediction is spot on. >>> Best wishes, >>> Thor >>> >>> >>> Vyas Munidas <muni> >>> SAMVA >>> Tuesday, August 5, 2008 10:24:36 PM >>> To - stellar day for US stocks >>> >>> Dear Professor, >>> >>> Jupiter exactly afflicts the 2H of the USA. Such and influence causes a >>> loss >>> of 50%, but being in the sign Leo and the 2H, they gain 50%. So do we >>> consider the effect of Jupiter here as completely negated? >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Vyas Munidas >>> >>> - >>> " Cosmologer " <cosmologer >>> <samva > >>> Tuesday, August 05, 2008 5:37 PM >>> A stellar day for US stocks >>> >>> Dear friends, >>> After a rather long period of adverse developments, with the stock >>> market >>> declining from late May through June and then remaining in range in >>> choppy >>> trading since, the stock market had an exceptionaly stellar day today, >>> with >>> the Dow Jones Industrial Average and other stock indexes rising almost >>> 3%. >>> That said, at 11,615, the Dow is still 12% below its late May peak of >>> 13,136. >>> The good news prompting todays rally was the ongoing sharp decline in >>> oil >>> prices, to $118 per barrel and the decision by the Federal Reserve to >>> not >>> raise its interest rates. This comes on the heels of another piece of >>> good >>> news recently, that the US economy expanded 1.9% in the 2nd quarter of >>> the >>> year. >>> In the SAMVA USA chart (Perpetual Union), the favourable development is >>> seen >>> in most of the functional benefics being well placed in transit and >>> mostly >>> free of close afflictions by natal or transit FM planets at this time. >>> In >>> particular, the conjunction of transit 2nd lord Sun with the 1st house >>> MEP >>> would be expected to temporarily boost the sense of well being. >>> However, >>> later this week the transit Sun becomes conjunct the stationary nodal >>> axis >>> its indications are likely to suffer - due to also ongoing affliction >>> of >>> natal Sun by the transit stationary nodal axis and the aspect of >>> transit >>> 6th >>> lord Jupiter to the 2nd house. >>> Best wishes, >>> Thor >>> >>> --- >>> >>> Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.